help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mannaerts, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mannaerts, B. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 12 6297-6304
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Pharmacodynamics of a Single Low Dose of Long-Acting Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH-Carboxy Terminal Peptide, Corifollitropin Alfa) in Women with World Health Organization Group II Anovulatory Infertility

A. H. Balen, A. G. Mulders, B. C. Fauser, B. C. Schoot, M. A. Renier, P. Devroey, M. J. Struijs and B. M. Mannaerts

Department of Reproductive Medicine (A.H.B.), Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS2 9NS United Kingdom; Erasmus Medical Center (A.G.M., B.C.F.), 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Catharina Ziekenhuis (B.C.S.), 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands; University Hospital of Antwerp (M.A.R.), B-2650 Edegem, Belgium; Center for Reproductive Medicine (P.D.), Dutch-Speaking Brussels Free University, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; and NV Organon (M.J.S., B.M.M.), 5340 BH Oss, The Netherlands

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Bernadette Mannaerts, M.Sc., Clinical Development Department, P.O. Box 20, 5340 BH Oss, The Netherlands. E-mail: b.mannaerts{at}organon.com.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, 55 anovulatory subjects received a single sc injection of placebo (n = 10) or recombinant long-acting FSH [FSH-carboxy terminal peptide (CTP), ORG 36286, corifollitropin alfa; NV Organon, The Netherlands] in doses of 7.5 (n = 13), 15 (n = 10), 30 (n = 11), or 60 µg (n = 11). The injection was given 2 or 3 d after the onset of a spontaneous or progestagen-induced withdrawal bleed.

After drug administration, the induced follicular response varied widely among subjects in each dose group. The percentage of subjects with a follicular response (at least one follicle ≥ 10.0 mm) increased with the dose (P < 0.01) and was 10, 31, 70, 73, and 82% in the placebo and 7.5-, 15-, 30-, and 60-µg treatment groups, respectively. In responding subjects, the average maximum number of follicles was 4.0, 7.6, 13.4, and 20.0, respectively, which was reached at 6.5, 6.9, 6.6, and 8.2 d after a single dose of 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 µg FSH-CTP, respectively. The dose-response for the number of follicles was statistically significant within the dose range tested (P < 0.01). Peak serum inhibin-B levels were significantly correlated with serum estradiol (E2) levels (r = 0.84, P < 0.01), and peak concentrations of inhibin-B and E2 correlated with the number of follicles observed at the same time point (for both hormones; r = 0.47, P < 0.01). Overall per treatment group, serum E2 and inhibin B concentrations significantly increased only in the two highest FSH-CTP dose groups, reaching peak concentrations at d 3 in the 30-µg group and at d 5 in the 60-µg group. Thereafter these hormone values declined rapidly, returning to baseline within 1 wk after FSH-CTP administration.

In total, nine of the 55 treated subjects (16.4%) ovulated after drug administration: one subject in the placebo group, two subjects in the 7.5-µg group, three subjects in the 15-µg group, two in the 30-µg group, and one in the 60-µg group. Three subjects had monofollicular ovulation after placebo (n = 1) and a single dose of 15 µg FSH-CTP (n = 2). In two subjects with too many preovulatory follicles, (multiple) ovulation was prevented by GnRH antagonist administration.

Thus, a single low dose of long-acting FSH-CTP was able to induce one or more follicles to grow up to ovulatory sizes, but the anovulatory status was not reversed because the incidence of subsequent (mono)ovulations was low.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN INFERTILE COUPLES, anovulation is diagnosed in approximately 20–25% of all cases and approximately 80% of these patients have serum FSH and estradiol (E2) levels within the normal range [World Health Organization (WHO) group II] (1). Currently, first-line treatment for anovulation in patients characterized as WHO group II is treatment with antiestrogens, predominantly clomiphene citrate (CC) (2). It has been documented that with CC treatment (50–150 mg daily for 5 d), approximately 70–80% of the women will become ovulatory, and certain patient characteristics may predict whether CC induction of ovulation will occur (3). Of the women who ovulate with CC, only 40–50% will conceive, and both age and cycle history may predict the chance of conception (4). It is assumed that CC modifies hypothalamic activity by affecting the concentration of the intracellular estrogen receptors, diminishes the negative feedback, and thereby activates the neuroendocrine mechanism for GnRH secretion. Therefore, CC acts as an antiestrogenic compound. In normoestrogenic states and under GnRH stimulation, CC preferentially promotes FSH release After CC intake both a flare-up of endogenous FSH and LH are observed, and it is thought that due to this flare-up, serum FSH concentrations surpass a distinct threshold level (5) that induces a follicular response in anovulatory women in whom follicular growth is otherwise arrested (6).

Alternatives to CC administration may be treatment with an FSH preparation that would mimic the CC-induced flare-up of FSH (7) without a concomitant rise in LH and would also lack any antiestrogenic effect. Of specific interest in this respect might be the novel long-acting FSH [FSH-carboxy terminal peptide (CTP), ORG 32489, corifollitropin alfa], which is a recombinant molecule constructed by coupling the carboxy terminal peptide of the ß-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin to the FSH ß-subunit. Like recombinant wild-type FSH, FSH-CTP is expressed by a Chinese hamster ovary cell line that is able to produce glycoprotein hormones with carbohydrate side chains that closely resemble their native structure. FSH-CTP contains four N-linked carbohydrate chains ({alpha}52, {alpha}78, ß7, and ß24) and 4 O-linked carbohydrate chains at the carboxy terminal peptide (ß115, ß121, ß126, and ß132). These four O-linked carbohydrates, rather than the addition of the peptide, causes a 3- to 4-fold increased in vivo half-life, compared with wild-type recombinant (r)FSH (8). Phase I studies in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (9) and female volunteers of reproductive age (10) have suggested that FSH-CTP treatment is safe and that the drug is nonimmunogenic in humans. After a single sc injection in women, peak levels are reached on average after 36 h, in comparison with 10 h for wild-type rFSH, and the terminal half-life is between 60 and 75 h (10). A recent study in in vitro fertilization patients indicated that FSH-CTP administered as a single dose of 120–240 µg is a potent inducer of multiple follicular growth for controlled ovarian stimulation (11). It is hypothesized that in anovulatory women, after a single low dose of FSH-CTP, the initial increase in FSH may stimulate several immature follicles, whereas the declining levels that will be reached 2–3 d after injection may prevent the smaller follicles from continuing their growth (12) and therefore lead to monofollicular growth and monoovulation.

The aim of the current study was to explore whether single low dosages of FSH-CPT induced ovulation in anovulatory and oligoovulatory women. The study was designed as a double-blind study and included placebo treatment because spontaneous ovulation may occur in oligomenorrheic women.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

A total of 55 subjects presenting with oligomenorrhea (cycle length 41 d or longer) or amenorrhea (no menstrual period for more than 6 months) were randomized. All subjects had a wish to conceive and were at least 18 and at most 39 yr of age, with a body mass index 18 or greater and 32 kg/m2 or less. Subjects had normal serum FSH (<10 IU/liter), prolactin, and TSH concentrations and either a progestagen-induced withdrawal bleed or spontaneous menstrual bleeding. At screening, ultrasonography was performed to identify those patients with polycystic ovaries (at least 10 follicles < 8 mm in each ovary) and serum FSH, LH, and total testosterone to identify those subjects with normal FSH but increased LH and/or androgens. The study was approved by the local ethical committees of all five participating centers and is in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.

Study design and assessments

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, subjects received a single injection of placebo or FSH-CPT (ORG 36286, corifollitropin alfa, NV Organon, Oss, The Netherlands). All 55 randomized subjects received a single injection of either placebo (n = 10), 7.5 µg FSH-CTP (n = 13), 15 µg FSH-CTP (n = 10), 30 µg FSH-CTP (n = 11), or 60 µg FSH-CTP (n = 11). The injection was given sc in the abdominal wall at 2 or 3 d after the onset of a spontaneous or progestagen-induced withdrawal bleed. Before injection and during the first week thereafter, ultrasound monitoring and blood sampling was performed every other day. Follicle sizes were reported as the mean of two measurements in two dimensions. One week after injection, subjects were monitored daily by ultrasonography, serum assessment of hormone concentrations, and urine collection to detect the preovulatory LH peak. If 10 d after injection, no follicles 12 mm or larger were observed or if follicles 12 mm or larger stopped growing (no increase in size and number for 4 d), monitoring was stopped and the cycle was discontinued. Ovulation was considered to have occurred with the observation of a positive urinary LH rise or a serum LH rise confirmed by a serum progesterone value of 15 nmol/liter or more assessed within 2 wk (usually 7 d after the moment of ovulation). Alternatively, ovulation after a urinary or serum LH rise could be confirmed by the rupture of the leading follicle(s) as observed by ultrasound. In case of hyperstimulation, endogenous gonadotropins could be suppressed and spontaneous ovulation prevented by giving daily injections of 2 mg of a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix, NV Organon).

Hormone assessments

Serum FSH-CTP concentrations were determined by enzyme immunoassay with a coefficient of variation (CV) less than 20% and a lowest detection limit of 0.079 ng/ml. Antibodies against FSH-CTP were assessed using a RIA based on the formation of an immune complex between a specific antibody and [125I]-labeled FSH-CTP. These samples were assessed with a CV less than 20% [the assays for FSH-CTP and antibodies against FSH-CTP were also described by Bouloux et al. (9)]. Serum FSH, LH, E2, and progesterone (P) levels were determined by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (AutoDELFIA, Wallac Oy, Finland) with a CV less than 20%. Lowest detection limits were 0.25 IU/liter, 0.6 IU/liter, 13.6 pg/ml, and 0.31 ng/ml, respectively. All of the aforementioned assays were assessed at NV Organon using validated assays.

Serum inhibin-B concentrations were determined by enzyme immunoassay (Oxford Bio-Innovation, Oxfordshire, UK) with a CV less than 20% and a lowest detection limit of 15.6 pg/ml. The inhibin-B concentrations were assessed by a central laboratory (AAI, Neu-Ulm, Germany) using a validated assay.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation

Serum FSH-CTP levels were analyzed in 41 subjects randomized to FSH-CTP treatment excluding four subjects having inconsistent or no values available for evaluation (one subject in the 15-µg group and three subjects in the 60-µg group). Serum FSH-CTP concentration-vs.-time data were pooled and analyzed using the nonlinear mixed effects modeling program NONMEM (University of California, San Francisco; GloboMax LLC, Hanover, MD). Serum FSH-CTP concentrations in time were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and a separate estimate for clearance after dosing with 7.5 µg. A fixed value for absorption rate of 0.102 h–1 was taken from a previous, dedicated PK trial with FSH-CTP because no information was available in this trial on the absorption phase of the pharmacokinetic profile. For this model both population (mean) and individual parameter estimates for total serum clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) were obtained. Individual estimates of exposure to FSH-CTP [area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax)] were calculated from the individual parameter estimates for CL/F and V/F.

Statistical methods

The main objective of this explorative double-blind study was to examine whether a single dose of FSH-CTP was able to induce (mono)ovulation in anovulatory subjects. To illustrate the value of the planned sample size (n = 15 per treatment group), the precision for estimating the dose that yields ovulation after one treatment attempt was calculated. The method, as described by Patel (13), was applied assuming that the highest dose of 60 µg FSH-CTP would induce ovulation in 60% of all subjects and that the dose of 7.5 µg would induce ovulation in 10% of the subjects. The dose with a response of 40% was then to be estimated with a precision (SE) of approximately 1.8 µg. However, the study planned to include in total 75 subjects (15 subjects per treatment group), but the inclusion of new subjects was discontinued at 55 subjects because of the overall low success rate.

In addition to summary statistics presented as an intention-to-treat analysis (of all patients who were randomized in the study), the treatment effect on the maximum number of follicles and the time interval to reach these numbers was analyzed by using a linear regression model with FSH-CTP dose as covariate. The correlation between parameters like the maximum number of follicles, maximum inhibin-B concentrations, and E2 concentrations was assessed by the Pearson correlation test. The incidence of ovulations was analyzed by means of the Fischer’s exact test. The dose response on the incidence of follicular response was tested by means of the Cochran-Armitage test. A result was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient characteristics

The five treatment groups, 55 subjects in total, were similar with respect to age, body height, body weight, and body mass index, and the overall means were 28.1 yr, 163.6 cm, 70.1 kg, and 26.1 kg/m2, respectively. The majority of subjects (76.4%) participating in this trial were Caucasian. Table 1Go presents a summary of the gynecological and treatment history per treatment group. In total 43 (78.2%) subjects suffered from oligomenorrhea (cycle length ≥ 41 d), and 12 subjects (21.8%) suffered from amenorrhea (no bleeding > 6 months). For the majority of subjects (47 subjects, 85.5%), anovulation was the only cause of infertility. Overall, the mean duration of infertility was 2.5 (range 0.7–9.0) yr, and 33 subjects (60.0%) suffered from primary infertility. In total, 28 subjects (50.9%) had received previous CC treatment, and for 22 of these 28 subjects, ovulation was confirmed after at least one clomiphene treatment cycle. A total of 16 subjects (29.1%) had previous ovulation induction by means of gonadotropins. No relevant differences were found between the treatment groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Gynecological and treatment history

 
At screening, median (range) serum hormone values were 5.4 (1.1–18.8) IU/liter for FSH, 8.7 (1.4–88.1) IU/liter for LH, and 1.8 (0.8–4.2) nmol/liter for total testosterone. One subject (placebo group) with an FSH value of 18.8 IU/liter and an LH value of 88.1 IU/liter was probably screened during an LH/FSH surge of a spontaneous cycle because a previous FSH value was 6.7 IU/liter. Ultrasonography revealed that 24 (43.6%) subjects had polycystic ovaries (four or five subjects in each treatment group).

Pharmacokinetic evaluation

Mean serum FSH-CTP concentrations and derived pharmacokinetic parameters are presented in Table 2Go. The population FSH-CTP concentration-vs.-time curves for the four dose groups are presented in Fig. 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Mean (SD) serum FSH-CTP levels and derived mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Mean serum FSH-CTP concentration-vs.-time curves after single FSH-CTP administration derived from fitting a one-compartment model on serum FSH-CTP measurements at d 3, 5, and 7. FSH-CTP was injected at time 0.

 
The mean elimination half-life varied from 77 to 86 h for the three highest-dose groups and was somewhat longer for the 7.5-µg group (110 h). The dose-normalized parameters of AUC and Cmax were similar for the three highest doses, implying that the serum concentrations of FSH-CTP were proportional to the dose within the 15- to 60-µg dose range. CL/F was lower in the 7.5-µg group (0.218 liters/h) than in the 15- to 60-µg groups (0.307 liters/h). The volume of distribution was 34.6 liters for all dose groups.

Follicular response per treatment group

Table 3Go presents for each treatment group the number of subjects without follicle growth (follicles < 8.0 mm) or with follicular growth that reached a certain maximum follicle size (divided into five size classes). A follicular response was defined as the development of at least one follicle of 10.0 mm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Number of subjects without follicular growth (only follicles <8.0 mm) or with follicular growth grouped according to the size of their leading follicle(s) as assessed after FSH-CTP administration before discontinuation or spontaneous ovulation

 
At d 1, before drug administration, six subjects showed small follicles of 8.0–9.9 mm with a mean incidence of 0.2 (± 0.6), 1.5 (± 5.0), 1.8 (± 5.3), 0.1 (± 0.3), and 0.0 (± 0.0) in the placebo and 7.5-, 15-, 30-, and 60-µg groups, respectively (Fig. 2Go). The percentage of subjects with a follicular response (at least one follicle ≥ 10.0 mm) was, respectively, 10, 31, 70, 73, and 82% (P < 0.01, see Table 3Go).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Mean number and size of follicles measured after a single low dose of long-acting FSH-CTP in anovulatory subjects (10–13 subjects per dose group). FSH-CTP was injected at d 1.

 
In the placebo group (n = 10), one subject had monofollicular growth and ovulation; three subjects showed one or more follicles of 8.0–9.9 mm, which did not progress; and six subjects had no follicle growth (all follicles < 8.0 mm).

After a single dose of 7.5 µg FSH-CTP (n = 13), a follicular response was noted in two subjects who ovulated at d 9 and 15, respectively. In six subjects initial follicular growth arrested at a maximum follicle size of 10.0–11.9 mm, and no follicular growth was noted in five subjects.

After a single dose of 15 µg FSH-CTP (n = 10), no follicular growth was observed in two subjects, initial follicular growth up to 11.9 mm was noted in three subjects, and in five subjects follicles 12.0 mm or larger were noted Three of the five responding subjects ovulated at 10, 12, and 19 d after FSH-CTP administration. For the other two subjects who did not ovulate, a maximum follicle size of 15.0–17.9 mm and 12.0–14.9 mm was reached at d 8 and 5–7, respectively.

After a single dose of 30 µg FSH-CTP (n = 11), one subject did not respond, five subjects showed initial follicle growth up to 11.9 mm, and five subjects had a follicular response resulting in follicles larger than 12.0 mm. In these five responders, follicle growth did not progress up to 18 mm; however, still two of these five subjects ovulated.

A single dose of 60 µg FSH-CTP (n = 11) was unable to induce a follicular response in two subjects. Follicles larger than 12.0 mm were observed in nine subjects; however, in six subjects the leading follicle(s) did not exceed a size of 14.9 mm and in four of these six subjects, a large cohort of small follicles between 8.0 and 11.9 mm was observed. Two of the three subjects with follicles exceeding 15.0 mm developed too many preovulatory follicles, namely eight and 10 follicles 15.0 mm or larger, respectively, and were treated for 1–2 wk with 2 mg GnRH antagonist to prevent multiple ovulation. One subject with two follicles 15.0 mm or larger ovulated 8 d after FSH-CTP administration.

Average follicular response after FSH-CTP treatment

Figure 2Go shows the overall mean number of ovarian follicles observed just prior (d 1) to and after single administration of 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 µg FSH-CTP (intention-to-treat groups). Restricted to responders (Table 3Go), the average maximum number of follicles observed with a diameter of 8.0 mm or larger was 4.0, 7.6, 13.4, and 20.0 after administration of 7.5, 15, 30, and 60 µg FSH-CTP. Also the size of follicles increased with the dose of FSH-CTP. The dose response for the number of follicles was statistically within the tested dose range of 7.5–60 µg FSH-CTP (P < 0.01). Also, the size of follicles increased with the dose of FSH-CTP. The time interval to reach this maximum number of follicles was 6.5, 6.9, 6.6, and 8.2 d, respectively, and was not significantly longer with increasing doses of FSH-CTP.

Hormones

Serum concentrations of FSH, LH, E2, and inhibin-B measured during the first 10 d after drug administration are presented in Fig. 3Go. In contrast to serum FSH-CTP immunoactivity (Table 2Go), the total FSH immunoreactivity measured by Delfia increased only in the 30- and 60-µg dose group during the first days after FSH-CTP administration (Fig. 3AGo). Similarly, endogenous LH was only temporarily decreased in the two highest dose groups (Fig. 3BGo), but average values in each treatment group remained between 2 and 10 IU/liter during the first 10 d after drug administration. Overall serum E2 and inhibin-B levels did increase up to d 3 in the 30-µg group and up to d 5 in the 60-µg group (Fig. 3Go, C and D). At these time points, serum inhibin-B levels correlated well with serum E2 levels (r = 0.84, P < 0.01), and peak serum inhibin-B and E2 both correlated with the number of follicles measured at the same time points (for both parameters r = 0.47, P < 0.01). After peak concentrations, serum E2, and inhibin-B values rapidly declined, returning to baseline 1 wk after FSH-CTP administration, whereas according to ultrasound assessments, follicle growth continued for another 3 d. At all time points, serum P levels were similar between the treatment groups (data not shown).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Median serum FSH (A), LH (B), E2 (C), and inhibin-B (D) levels after a single low dose of placebo or four dosages of long-acting FSH-CTP in anovulatory subjects (10–13 subjects per treatment group). FSH-CTP was injected at d 1.

 
Ovulations

In total, nine of the 55 treated subjects (16.4%) ovulated after drug administration: one subject in the placebo group, two subjects in the 7.5-µg group, three subjects in the 15-µg group, two in the 30 µg group, and one in the 60-µg group (NS between the treatment groups). Subjects who ovulated suffered from oligomenorrhea with the exception of the placebo-treated subject who suffered from amenorrhea but ovulated in nine previous CC cycles. Ovulation was documented by either an urinary LH peak, a serum LH rise (>10 IU/liter), ultrasonography, and/or a midluteal P rise (Table 4Go). Three of the ovulating subjects had monofollicular cycles (no other follicles ≥ 15 mm at the day when the first follicle exceeded or was equal to 18 mm) after treatment with placebo (n = 1) or 15 µg FSH-CTP (n = 2). One subject who ovulated had two follicles larger than 18 mm, whereas four subjects ovulated after reaching one or two follicles of 15–17 mm. For one subject who became pregnant, ovulation was not documented because she was prematurely discontinued because of insufficient ovarian response.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Clinical outcome of subjects who ovulated after drug administration

 
Safety data

None of the subjects experienced a serious adverse event or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and none of the subjects discontinued because of an adverse event. In total 29 of the 55 subjects experienced at least one adverse event of mild to moderate intensity, of which headache was the most frequently reported in all five treatment groups. No antibodies against FSH-CTP were detected. In general, FSH-CTP was well tolerated in terms of the assessed safety parameters, and no relevant differences between treatment groups were observed.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, treatment with a single dose of long-acting FSH in women with WHO group II anovulatory infertility induced follicle growth up to preovulatory sizes; however, the incidence of subsequent ovulation appeared to be low in all dose groups. In the first ovulation induction study using long-acting FSH, a rather heterogeneous group of normogonadotropic, anovulatory patients with different treatment history was included. This may have contributed to the rather large variability in follicular response observed between subjects within each treatment group but may not explain the low success rate in all dose groups.

Evaluation of serum FSH-CTP levels has indicated that the bioavailability of FSH-CTP in this study with anovulatory women is very similar to that previous established in pituitary-suppressed female volunteers (10) and in in vitro fertilization patients treated in a flexible GnRH antagonist regimen (11). This implies that the low success rates in this study are not related to an exposure different from anticipated. Moreover, it also indicates that the pharmacokinetic properties of FSH-CTP are not influenced by the endocrine status of the treated subjects. Within the dose range of 15–60 µg FSH-CTP, peak levels of serum FSH-CTP levels increased in a linear dose-related manner, whereas the elimination half-life was independent of from the dose given. In the current study, the lowest dose of 7.5 µg FSH-CTP tended toward a longer terminal half-life than the 15- to 60-µg doses of FSH-CTP. This longer half-life was due to lower serum clearance (CL/F = 0.218 liter/h vs. 0.307 liter/h), whereas the volume of distribution was the same for all dose groups. Mean clearance values reported in other trials with FSH-CTP varied from 0.205 to 0.375 liter/h, and, therefore, the lower clearance of the 7.5-µg group is assumed to be a chance finding.

Although spontaneous ovulation appears to have occurred in one subject in the placebo group, this study demonstrates that FSH-CTP is capable of inducing follicular growth in anovulatory women in a dose-dependent manner because the percentage of responding subjects and the number and size of follicles increased with the dose of FSH-CTP administered. Accordingly, follicular growth arrested too early in the lowest dose group and too many preovulatory follicles developed in the highest dose group, indicating that the therapeutic window is very small.

In contrast to CC treatment, the administration of exogenous FSH does not result in a reduced negative feedback by endogenous estrogens. Rather the exogenous FSH induces an initial estrogen rise that enforces negative feedback. Thus, exogenous FSH is required until serum estradiol levels are sufficiently high to induce the natural (endogenous) LH surge. When subjects are treated with exogenous FSH, therefore, serum FSH levels should be sufficiently high to select and support the leading follicle up to ovulation (14). In the current study using long-acting FSH, the dilemma seems to be that too high a dose selects too many follicles, whereas a lower single dose is unable to support follicle growth up to ovulation; thus, the therapeutic window of appropriate FSH levels is small. Moreover, a distinct individual variability in sensitivity of the ovary to respond to FSH is another complicating factor. The ability to predict the individual FSH threshold (15) may represent a step forward by allowing for individual dose adjustments. Induction of ovulation with long-acting FSH may be feasible in anovulatory subjects if followed by a repeated low dose of FSH-CTP or daily FSH injections to support the leading follicle(s) up to ovulation.

After treatment with 30 or 60 µg FSH-CTP, initial rises of serum E2 and inhibin-B peaked before the maximum number or size of follicles was reached. Whereas these hormones decreased and returned to baseline levels, follicular growth continued for another 3 d. This discrepancy suggests that after treatment with long-acting FSH, the amount of FSH required to support follicular growth may be lower than the amount of FSH required to support hormonal production during follicular development.

Ovulation induction aims to achieve repeated unifollicular ovulation in anovulatory infertility, the most common cause of which is polycystic ovary syndrome. Strategies to induce ovulation include weight loss, oral antiestrogens (principally CC), parenteral gonadotropin therapy, and laparoscopic ovarian surgery. In addition, more recently there has been interest in the use of insulin-lowering agents (such as metformin and the thiazolidinediones) and the aromatase inhibitors (16). There have been no adequately powered randomized studies to determine which of these therapies provides the best overall chance of an ongoing pregnancy. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome are at risk of multiple follicle growth and hence multiple pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Because of this, ovulation induction has to be carefully monitored with serial ultrasound scans.

Today gonadotropin therapy is indicated (17, 18) only for anovulatory women who have been treated with antiestrogens if they have either failed to ovulate or they have a response to CC that is likely to reduce their chance of conception (e.g. persistent hypersecretion of LH). The main question addressed by the current feasibility study was whether a single low dose of FSH-CTP could replace first- and second-line treatment of anovulatory women, assuming that both CC-responders and CC-resistant patients could be successfully treated by this long-acting FSH. After injection, serum FSH-CTP initially rises up to peak levels at 1–2 d, and thereafter serum FSH-CTP slowly decreases. This overall profile mimics the FSH flare-up induced by CC treatment and the step-down approach in classical ovulation induction, although there are some essential differences. The CC-induced flare-up of FSH lasts usually from the first treatment day of CC up to the last treatment day of CC and only declines thereafter. With the step-down protocol, follicular recruitment is achieved using 150 or 225 IU daily for 3–4 d before decreasing the dose to 75 IU to maintain follicular development (19, 20, 21). Experimental studies have indicated that initiation of follicular growth requires a 10–30% increment in the dose of exogenous FSH, and the threshold changes with follicular growth due to an increased number of FSH receptors so that the concentration of FSH required to maintain growth is less than that required to initiate it (22).

It can be extremely difficult to predict the response to stimulation of women with polycystic ovaries; indeed, this is the greatest therapeutic challenge in all ovulation induction therapies, regardless as to whether daily or long-acting FSH is applied. The polycystic ovary is characteristically quiescent, at least when viewed by ultrasound, before often exhibiting an exuberant and, sometimes, explosive response to stimulation. It can be very challenging to stimulate the development of a single dominant follicle and whereas attempts have been made to predict a multifollicular response (23) by looking at midfollicular endocrine profiles and numbers of small follicles, it is harder to do so before commencing ovarian stimulation and hence determine the required starting dose of gonadotropin.

Multiple pregnancy is the main undesirable side effect of fertility therapy because of the increased rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Gonadotropin therapy should therefore be given in low doses to women with anovulatory infertility, and strict criteria should be employed before the administration of the ovulatory trigger. The underlying principle of all methods of ovulation induction for women with polycystic ovary syndrome must always be to use the lowest possible dose to achieve unifollicular ovulation.

Therefore, development of a long-acting FSH preparation by means of a single starting dose for all patients may not be feasible. Because each patient has her own threshold above which monofollicular growth may occur, patients may benefit when started in the first cycle with a very low dose of FSH-CTP and, if insufficient, step up to a higher dose in the next cycle. In addition, this small dose-finding study indicates that in the same cycle a second low dose of FSH-CTP or adjuvant rFSH may be required to induce ovulation Whether the development of long-acting FSH for monofollicular ovulation will be feasible needs additional research that may lead to a new strategy and treatment regimen including a single injection of long-acting FSH.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Huub Jan Kleijn and Michiel van de Heuvel for the pharmacokinetic evaluation of the study.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by NV Organon.

Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; CC, clomiphene citrate; CL/F, total serum clearance; Cmax, maximum concentration; CTP, carboxy terminal peptide; CV, coefficient of variation; E2, estradiol; P, progesterone; r, recombinant; V/F, volume of distribution.

Received April 7, 2004.

Accepted September 14, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. World Health Organization 1993 WHO manual for the standardized investigation and diagnosis of the infertile couple. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
  2. Dickey R, Holtkamp E 1998 Development, pharmacology and clinical experience with clomiphene citrate. Hum Reprod Update 2:483–506
  3. Imani B, Eijkemans MJC, te Velde ER, Habbema JDF, Fauser BCJM 1998 Predictors of patients remaining anovulatory during clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic oligoemenorrheic infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2361–2365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Imani B, Eijkemans MJC, te Velde ER, Habbema JDF, Fauser BCJM 1999 Predictors of chances to conceive in ovulatory patients during clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic oligoemenorrheic infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1617–1622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Brown JB, Evans JH, Adey FD, Taft HP, Townsend L 1969 Factors involved in the induction of fertile ovulation with human gonadotrophins. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 76:289–307[Medline]
  6. Shoham Z, Borenstein R, Lunenfeld B, Pariente C 1990 Hormonal profiles following clomiphene citrate therapy in conception and nonconception cycles. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 33:271–278[Medline]
  7. Out HJ, Coelingh Bennink HJT 1997 Clomiphene citrate in the twenty-first century: an anachronism? Assist Reprod Rev 6:94–101
  8. Fares FA, Suganuma N, Nishimori K, LaPolt PS, Hsueh AJ, Boime I 1992 Design of a long-acting follitropin agonist by fusing the C-terminal sequence of the chorionic gonadotropin ß subunit to the follitropin ß subunit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4304–4308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bouloux PMG, Handelsman DJ, Jockenhövel F, Nieschlag E, Rabinovici J, Frasa WL, de Bie JJ, Voortman G, Itskovitz-Eldor J 2001 First human exposure to FSH-CTP in hypogonadotrophic hypogonadal males. Hum Reprod 16:1592–1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Duijkers IJM, Klipping C, Boerrigter PJ, Machielsen CSM, de Bie JJ, Voortman G 2002 Single dose pharmacokinetics and effects on follicular growth and serum hormones of a long acting recombinant FSH preparation (ORG 36286) in healthy pituitary suppressed females. Hum Reprod 17:1987–1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Devroey P, Fauser BC, Platteau P, Beckers NG, Dhont M, Mannaerts BM 2004 Induction of multiple follicular development by a single dose of long-acting recombinant FSH (FSH-CTP, corifollitropin alfa) for controlled ovarian stimulation before in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2062–2070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Fauser BCJM, Heusden AM 1997 Manipulation of human ovarian function: physiological concepts and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev 18:71–106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Patel HI 1992 Sample size for a dose-response study. J Biopharm Stat 2:1–8[Medline]
  14. Van Santbrink EJ, Fauser BC 1997 Urinary follicle-stimulating hormone for normogonadotropic clomiphene-resistant anovulatory infertility, prospective, randomized comparison between low dose step-up and step-down dose regimens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3597–3602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Imani B, Eijkemans MJC, Faessen GH, Bouchard P, Giudice LC, Fauser BCJM 2002 Prediction of the individual follicle-stimulating hormone threshold for gonadotropin induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic anovulatory infertility: an approach to increase safety and efficiency. Fertil Steril 77:83–90[Medline]
  16. Van Santbrink EJ, Fauser BC 2003 Is there a future for ovulation induction in the current era of assisted reproduction? Hum Reprod 18:2499–2502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. 1997 Female infertility: treatment options for complicated cases. The ESHRE Capri Workshop. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. Hum Reprod 12:1191–1196
  18. Lunenfeld B, Insler V 1974 Classification of amenorrhoeic states and their treatment by ovulation induction. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 3:223–237[Medline]
  19. Fauser BC, Donderwinkel PF, Schoot DC 1993 The step-down principle in gonadotrophin treatment and the role of GnRH analogues. Ballieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 7:309–330[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Van Sautbrink EJP, Donderwinkel PGJ, van Dessel TJHM, Fauser BCJM 1995 Gonadotrophin induction of ovulation using a step-down dose regimen: single center clinical experience in 82 patients. Hum Reprod 10:1048–1053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Christin-Maitre S, Hugues JN, on behalf of the Recombinant FSH Study Group 2003 A comparative randomized multicentric study comparing the step-up versus step-down protocol in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 18:1626–1631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ben Rafael Z, Levy T, Schoemaker J 1995 Pharmacokinetics of follicle-stimulating hormone: clinical significance. Fertil Steril 63:689–700[Medline]
  23. Mulders AGMGJ, Laven JSE, Eijkemans MJC, Hughes EG, Fauser BCJM 2003 Patient predictors for outcome of gonadotrophin ovulation induction in women with normogonadotrophic anovulatory infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 9:429–449[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mannaerts, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balen, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mannaerts, B. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals