| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Divisions of Endocrinology (R.B., M.B., D.V.) and Geriatric Medicine (S.B.), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Roger Bouillon, M.D., Ph.D., Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology, Onderwijs & Navorsing, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: roger.bouillon{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene or due to estrogen deficiency in the context of congenital aromatase deficiency) have provided evidence for a primary role of estrogens in male skeletal development (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). The affected men presented with open epiphyses and continuous growth resulting in tall stature, increased bone remodeling, and reduced bone mineral density (BMD). Administration of estrogen, started at ages 2431 yr, induced rapid epiphyseal closure and cessation of linear growth, reduced bone turnover, and increased (areal) bone density (3, 4, 5, 6). In all these reports, BMD was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), providing a two-dimensional areal view of the three-dimensional mineralized mass of bone, but these studies were not designed to address the relative contribution of bone growth vs. changes in true bone density. Moreover, during puberty in men, the impact of estrogen on epiphyseal closure, linear growth, bone size, and/or bone mass may change over time (7). In this study of a boy with congenital aromatase deficiency, we report the skeletal response to estrogen treatment at a significantly earlier stage of skeletal development. In addition to DXA measurements at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, bone size and true volumetric BMD (vBMD) were sequentially obtained at the radius, using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At the age of 16 yr and 4 months, genetic analysis confirmed the diagnosis of aromatase deficiency in our patient. The propositus was evaluated because this mutation had been suspected and subsequently confirmed in his older sister with pubertal failure. Physical examination revealed no gynecomastia or other abnormalities. He weighed 82 kg and was 172 cm tall at the time of diagnosis. Testicular volume and consistency and the degree of virilization were also normal for his age (Tanner stage V). The patient and his sister were of Moroccan descent, and their parents were first cousins. His history was unremarkable except for a congenital hearing loss of 85%, which was also present in his adult brother and a paternal cousin (also a product from a consanguineous marriage). The father of the propositus has less severe decreased hearing as well. The patient did not use any medication, alcohol, or drugs. He had a sedentary lifestyle, as his hearing impairment interfered with an active social life.
Genetic analysis and biochemical measurements
Genetic analysis of both siblings revealed homozygosity for a C-base deletion in exon 5 of the CYP19 gene, causing a frame-shift mutation that resulted in a truncated, inactive enzyme (8). Their parents and elder brother were heterozygous carriers. Serum concentrations of hormones and osteocalcin were measured by conventional RIAs. Free testosterone was computed as an estimate of biologically available testosterone from its total serum concentrations, SHBG, and albumin (9).
Bone density measurements
Areal BMD (aBMD) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and radius (g/cm2) was measured using the DXA QDR 4500a fan beam system (Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA) with a precision error of less than 1%. To account for changes in bone size, vBMD was also estimated by calculation of the bone mineral apparent density (BMAD; g/cm3) as previously described (10). Spine BMAD was derived from the following equation: bone mineral content (BMC) ÷ Ap3/2; and BMAD of the femoral neck and radius was determined using the following equation: BMC ÷ Ap2 (BMC is the quantity of bone mineral within the scan area, and Ap is the projected area).
pQCT was performed at the ultradistal radius using Stratec XCT-960 equipment (Stratec GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany). Measurements of vBMD were taken at the 4% point (4% of ulna length proximal to the most proximal site of the radial articular surface). Image processing and the calculation of numerical values were performed using the manufacturers software. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the radius was determined after detecting the outer bone contour at a threshold of 280 mg/cm3. Total vBMD was defined as the mean density of the total cross-section. Trabecular vBMD was determined as the mean density of the 45% central area of the bones cross-section. The pQCT system also yields a parameter called cortical + subcortical vBMD, which is usually referred to as cortical vBMD. This represents the mean density in the 55% peripheral bone area. To include a measure of true cortical vBMD, an additional calculation was performed using a cortical threshold of 650 mg/cm3. Cortical thickness was calculated using a formula assuming a circular ring model for the radius (11). Reproducibility was 1.28% for CSA, 1.72% for total vBMD, 1.02% for trabecular vBMD, and 1.14% for cortical vBMD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite full pubertal development and supraphysiological levels of total and free testosterone, x-rays of the left wrist and hand revealed open epiphyses and a bone age of only 12 yr (as assessed by roentgenographic standards for bone development by Gruelich and Pyle).
At the age of 17 yr, treatment with estradiol valeriate at a daily oral dose of 1 mg was initiated, after obtaining informed consent. Administration of estrogen increased serum estradiol (16 pg/ml) (59 pmol/liter) and normalized total and free testosterone (468 ng/dl and 16 ng/dl, respectively) (16 nmol/liter and 0.55 nmol/liter, respectively), FSH (4.7 mU/ml), and LH (4.4 mU/ml). Serum osteocalcin (88 ng/ml) was significantly reduced as well (values were at 3 yr of estrogen therapy and representative of values obtained during active treatment). During treatment, body height increased by 8.5%, from 176 to 191 cm, and bone age matured from 12 yr and 5 months to 16 yr and 8 months, with near closure of the epiphyses only observed at 20 yr and 5 months of age (Figs. 1
and 2
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In men with aromatase deficiency, estrogen treatment has been associated with rapid closure (within 36 months) of the initially unfused epiphyses (3, 4, 12), providing compelling evidence that estrogen fuses the epiphyses and terminates male linear growth. Our patient, however, continued linear growth during several years of estrogen therapy, with delayed closure of the epiphyses. This difference probably reflects the significantly younger bone age at which estrogen was initiated (12 yr and 5 months vs. 14 yr and 5 months to 16 yr and 5 months in previously reported cases). Earlier studies in patients with idiopathic delay of puberty already suggested a growth-promoting effect of low-dose estradiol (14), whereas administration of an aromatase inhibitor to patients with familial precocious puberty, a rare disorder associated with a mutation of the LH receptor resulting in adult levels of serum testosterone by the age of 2 yr, decreased growth rate (15). Overall, these findings support the concept that estrogens accelerate pubertal skeletal growth, followed by an estrogen-induced growth-limiting effect through epiphyseal maturation and closure.
During treatment with estradiol, bone age increased from 12 yr and 5 months to 16 yr and 8 months after 41 months of estradiol treatment. Along with the maturation of the skeleton, axial and peripheral BMD increased substantially. However, aBMD, as assessed by DXA, is a function of both the size of the bone and the true amount of bone within its periosteal envelope (vBMD). In the patient presented here, peripheral vBMD (whether estimated from DXA or directly measured by pQCT) did not change significantly during treatment with estradiol. However, bone size (as determined by the CSA of the radius) increased dramatically by approximately 45%, with a concomitant increase in cortical thickness of 12%. The changes observed in our propositus are similar to those associated with normal pubertal growth and support the notion that, in growing bones, except for the spine, true density does not increase (7, 16). As the bone grows in length and diameter, the mass of bone inside the periosteum increases in proportion to the enlarging volume of the whole bone, including the marrow space. During normal growth, vBMD remains constant, but aBMD increases due to an increase in external bone size. This increase is a particularly important contributor to bone strength because the resistance of bone to bending or torsional forces is related exponentially to its diameter (17).
During normal male puberty, the enlargement of the bone diameter is associated with cortical thickening as a result of accelerated periosteal apposition (with less endocortical expansion). In this process, both the stimulatory effects of androgens and the lack of exposure to the inhibitory effects of estrogen on periosteal apposition are considered to be critical (7, 18, 19). During prepubertal growth, periosteal apposition increases bone width in both sexes. In pubertal males, periosteal diameter continues to expand; however, when females enter puberty, periosteal apposition is inhibited (20). These gender-specific patterns are considered to reflect differences in exposure to endogenous estrogens. However, in our patient, periosteal diameter did not cease to expand in response to estrogen therapy. In fact, CSA of the radius continued to increase during administration of estradiol. In other recent reports of affected men, increases in aBMD were reported, but vBMD and bone size were not assessed. The periosteal expansion observed in our patient, without concomitant changes in vBMD, suggests that the estrogen-induced gain in aBMD in the context of aromatase deficiency may be primarily driven by an increase in bone size. The enlargement of cortical bone in our patient cannot be explained by estrogen-stimulated endosteal apposition and demonstrates that, in growing men, estrogens stimulate rather than inhibit periosteal apposition.
Although the stimulation of linear growth in our patient was generally modest (8.5% during the 41-month treatment period), his increase in bone size was substantial. At cortical sites, such as radius and femoral neck, DXA-assessed total area increased by 18 and 21%, respectively, without a significant change in BMAD. Direct measurements of vBMD using pQCT at the radius confirmed that volumetric density was largely unaffected by estrogen treatment. Our observations challenge the traditional view that periosteal expansion of male pubertal bone results only from stimulation of the androgen receptor and lack of inhibitory signals from the estrogen receptor. The present data demonstrate the essential contribution of low-dose estrogen to periosteal pubertal growth, although we acknowledge that an individual case study, by design, does not allow us to elucidate the exact molecular or cellular mechanisms. Androgen action alone, without estrogen receptor activation, appears to be insufficient. Of course, it is possible and might even be likely that combined androgen receptor and estrogen receptor-
activation are needed for male pubertal bone expansion.
How can these findings be reconciled with the well-established gender differences in bone size? A unifying hypothesis could be that estrogens, rather than androgens, are driving periosteal bone apposition, with a biphasic, dose-dependent effect of estrogen. Assuming a dose-response relationship between estradiol levels and bone expansion in both sexes, stimulation would occur at low levels, as is the case in males and in early pubertal girls, whereas increasing exposure to higher concentrations of estrogen (as found in late puberty and adulthood in females) would inhibit periosteal growth. This assumption is consistent with both the lifelong slow periosteal bone expansion in males and the resumption of bone expansion after menopause (21, 22). Estrogen may induce periosteal bone formation in both sexes through estrogen receptor-
, whereas inhibition of periosteal expansion may be primarily an estrogen receptor-ß effect. Observations of increased periosteal expansion in female estrogen receptor-ß knockout mice are consistent with this hypothesis (23, 24). Because of the biomechanical importance of the deposition of bone on the periosteal surface, identifying the molecular basis of estrogen actions on periosteal apposition and their potential interaction with local and systemic factors, such as androgens, GH, IGF-I, and PTH, could have major implications for bone physiology and therapy.
Estrogens are critically involved in male linear growth, ultimately leading to growth plate closure. From our findings of low-dose estrogen treatment of an adolescent male with congenital aromatase deficiency, we conclude that exposure to estrogens is also essential for the process of pubertal periosteal bone expansion typically associated with the male bone phenotype. Androgens alone are insufficient to drive periosteal bone formation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: ABMD, Areal bone mineral density; BMAD, bone mineral apparent density; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; CSA, cross-sectional area; DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; pQCT, peripheral quantitative computed tomography; vBMD, volumetric bone mineral density.
Received March 30, 2004.
Accepted September 9, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Khosla, S. Amin, and E. Orwoll Osteoporosis in Men Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2008; 29(4): 441 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Venken, R. Bouillon, and D. Vanderschueren Androgens Versus Estrogens: Different Theories About Opposing Actions on Periosteal Bone Expansion IBMS BoneKEy, April 1, 2008; 5(4): 130 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Keller State of the Art Reviews: Development of Fitness in Children: The Influence of Gender and Physical Activity American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 58 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Tobias, C. D. Steer, C. Vilarino-Guell, and M. A. Brown Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Regulates Area-Adjusted Bone Mineral Content in Late Pubertal Girls J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 641 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Rochira, L. Zirilli, A. D Genazzani, A. Balestrieri, C. Aranda, B. Fabre, P. Antunez, C. Diazzi, C. Carani, and L. Maffei Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in two men with aromatase deficiency: evidence that circulating estrogens are required at the hypothalamic level for the integrity of gonadotropin negative feedback. Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 155(4): 513 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. de Ronde, Y. T. van der Schouw, H. A.P. Pols, L. J.G. Gooren, M. Muller, D. E. Grobbee, and F. H. de Jong Calculation of Bioavailable and Free Testosterone in Men: A Comparison of 5 Published Algorithms Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1777 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C M Bunck, A. W F T Toorians, P. Lips, and L. J G Gooren The effects of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole on bone metabolism and cardiovascular risk indices in ovariectomized, androgen-treated female-to-male transsexuals. Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 154(4): 569 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Bilezikian What's Good for the Goose's Skeleton is Good for the Gander's Skeleton. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1223 - 1225. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Rochira, A Balestrieri, B Madeo, L Zirilli, A R M Granata, and C Carani Osteoporosis and male age-related hypogonadism: role of sex steroids on bone (patho)physiology Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2006; 154(2): 175 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Vanderschueren, K. Venken, J. Ophoff, R. Bouillon, and S. Boonen Sex Steroids and the Periosteum--Reconsidering the Roles of Androgens and Estrogens in Periosteal Expansion J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 378 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Seeman and G. J. Strewler Clinical and Basic Research Papers - December 2004 Selections IBMS BoneKEy, January 1, 2005; 2(1): 1 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |