| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Endocrinology and Metabolism (R.E., B.C., C.R., L.A., P.P., A.P.), Oncology (F.B., C.U.), and Surgery (P.M., P.B.), University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; Department of Pathology (R.C., Y.N.), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267; and AMBISEN Center, High Technology Center for the Study of the Environmental Damage of the Endocrine and Nervous Systems (A.P.), University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: R. Elisei, M.D., Department of Endocrinology, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy. E-mail: relisei{at}endoc.med.unipi.it.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In conclusion, we identified a new germline RET gene mutation during a routine RET gene screening of an apparently sporadic MTC case. This mutation showed a very low transforming activity as demonstrated by the absence of MTC phenotype in heterozygous subjects. The possibility that the homozygous gene carriers were indeed carrying a germline loss of heterozygosity was excluded by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis for RET gene performed on lymphocytes derived from one homozygous patient. The analysis of several RET polymorphisms also confirmed the presence of two mutated alleles in MTC affected patients and both mutated and wild-type allele in heterozygous subjects.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1993 two independent groups discovered germline point mutations of the RET protooncogene as a causative event in MEN 2A (3) and FMTC (4). One year later, MEN 2B was also found to be associated with germline RET protooncogene mutations (5). Data regarding RET genetic analysis of a large series of 477 MEN 2-affected families were collected by the International RET Consortium demonstrating that 95% of families with MEN 2B and MEN 2A and 88% of families with FMTC were harboring a heterozygous RET germline mutation (6). After the first pool of RET point mutation was identified, several other mutations have been described and the frequency of RET mutations raised to 96 and 100% according to different series (7, 8). As for sporadic MTC, somatic point mutations of RET gene have been reported in approximately 40% of sporadic MTC (9, 10). These mutations are almost invariably located in exon 16 (codon 918) and can rarely be found in different exons (11, 12).
In this paper we report a novel germline homozygous mutation of the RET gene, found by the routine genetic screening for RET mutations in a patient with an apparently sporadic MTC. Eight family members were also studied for the presence of the mutation and its relationship with the MTC phenotype. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for RET gene was performed on the lymphocytes of one homozygous affected subject to rule out the possibility of the presence of a germline loss of heterozygosity (LOH).
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 51-yr-old man was referred to our clinic for the presence of a thyroid nodule with a calcitonin (Ct)-positive immunocytochemistry. At the first evaluation, basal and pentagastrin (Pg)-stimulated Ct levels were 183 and 2853 pg/ml, respectively. The patient was submitted to a further clinical evaluation with a neck ultrasound that showed a thyroid volume of 20 ml and a small hypoechoic nodule of 10 x 14 x 11 mm in the right lobe. Negative abdomen ultrasound and normal level of plasmatic and urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine excluded the presence of a pheochromocytoma. The normal levels of serum PTH and calcium demonstrated the absence of hyperparathyroidism. No other cases of MTC were present in the family history. The patient underwent total thyroidectomy and central neck dissection. Histological examination showed the presence of one MTC foci of 12 mm in the right lobe and one MTC microfoci of 0.3 mm in the left lobe. No lymph node metastases have been found. As routinely performed in all MTC patients, the index case was submitted to RET mutation genetic screening, which revealed a germline point mutation. The result of the genetic screening determined a reclassification of our apparently sporadic case as hereditary case.
Family members
As shown in Fig. 1
a total of eight family members were investigated. All of them were examined with neck ultrasound, basal and Pg-stimulated serum Ct, thyroid function (free T3, free T4, TSH, thyroglobulin antibodies, thyroperoxidase antibodies), serum PTH and calcium, plasmatic and urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine, and abdomen ultrasound. After signing an informed consent, they were also submitted to the genetic analysis of RET gene mutations. The clinical history of the family was also collected.
|
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood, amplified by PCR and sequenced following the method previously described (13). To confirm the presence of the Ala883Thr mutation, exon 15 was subjected to digestion using Alu I (Promega, Madison, WI) restriction enzyme. Exon 15 was also amplified with two different pairs of primers to verify the possibility of a preferential annealing to the mutated allele of the firstly used primers pair. Polymorphisms in exons 3, 7, 11, 13, 14, and 15 were also studied.
FISH analysis
FISH analysis was performed according to a previously reported method (14) and using a 207-kb bacterial artificial chromosome clone RP11-351D16 (accession no. AC010864, human chromosome 10q11) spanning the entire RET gene region. Bovine adrenocortical cell DNA was extracted with a commercial kit (Plasmid Midi, Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and 2 µg were directly labeled with SpectrumGreen-deoxyuridine 5-triphosphate using a nick translation kit (Vysis, Abbott Park, IL). Metaphase and interphase nuclei were prepared from heparinized blood sample of the index case according to the previously described method (15).
Transfection assay
The construct used in this study was cloned in pRC/cytomegalovirus. The wild-type RET and RET/C634R were kindly gifted by Dr. Isabella Ceccherini. RET/A883T was generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuickChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The mutation was confirmed by sequencing. The transfection experiments were performed as previously reported (16).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The analysis of the new Ala883Thr RET mutation in the family members revealed a heterozygous mutation in the 82-yr-old mother, son, and two sisters of the index case. One brother and two first-degree cousins were negative for the mutation. Finally, one brother was found to be homozygous for the Ala883Thr mutation, as the index case. All mutated cases were confirmed by restriction analysis with Alu I digestion.
The clinical history of the family showed the absence of other known MTC cases and the consanguinity of the parents of our index case (second-degree cousins). The father died in 1975 for nonthyroid carcinoma, and no archived material was available for genetic analysis.
As shown in Table 1
, subject III:3 was affected by a nodular goiter (vol 57 ml), but she was negative both for basal and Pg-stimulated Ct. The heterozygous subjects V:1, IV:7, and IV:12, who were 15, 63, and 58 yr old, respectively, did not show any clinical and/or biochemical signs of MTC. Subjects IV:3, IV:4, and IV:6, who were negative for the mutation, were also negative at clinical and biochemical examination. The 56-yr-old brother (IV:2) carrying the homozygous mutation showed a nodular goiter and elevated basal and Pg-stimulated Ct levels (18 and 138 pg/ml, respectively). None of the family members was affected by pheochromocytoma and/or parathyroid adenoma. Subject IV:2 underwent thyroidectomy and one MTC microfocus of 0.3 mm associated with CCH was found.
|
|
|
Finally, the results of transfection experiments indicated that the Ala883Thr mutation did not confer any detectable oncogenic activity to RET.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The RET mutations described so far in association with MEN 2 and FMTC affected one of the two alleles (heterozygous mutations) and therefore were inherited as autosomic dominant traits (17). The penetrance of MTC is near 100% for the 634 and 918 mutations but lower for the others, which are mainly associated with FMTC. However, it has been shown that positive gene carriers, operated on the basis of the genetic testing and independently from serum Ct levels, showed histological features of CCH and/or MTC micro- or macroscopic disease (18, 19). On the basis of these observations, it has been widely accepted that RET gene acts as a dominant oncogene, and a single allele mutation is sufficient for tumor initiation. To our knowledge, a germline homozygous mutation of RET gene has been reported in only one family affected by FMTC harboring a Val804Met mutation (20). As in our case, this family showed a history of parental consanguinity, heterozygous gene carriers with normal basal and Pg-stimulated serum Ct, and three of four homozygous gene carriers with CCH and/or MTC foci at histology. At variance with the novel RET mutation found in this study, the Val804Met mutation is well known as pathogenic for FMTC and characterized by a high degree of expression with a late onset of the disease whose clinical behavior is usually less aggressive (7, 21, 22). Because the Ala883Thr RET mutation has never been described, there is no evidence that this mutation can lead to the development of the MTC in heterozygous condition. Although it is possible, it is unlikely that the 82-yr-old woman will develop the MTC in her remaining lifetime. Furthermore, all but one heterozygous nonaffected subject were older than the IV:1 and IV:2 affected members. On the basis of these considerations subjects IV:7, IV:12, and IV:2 were expected to have at least a positive Pg stimulation test.
In a large series of MTC patients younger than 20 yr, it has been recently demonstrated that whatever the mutation, both extracellular and intracellular, only patients younger than 13 yr had negative histological findings after thyroidectomy (23). In our opinion these results are in agreement with our hypothesis that heterozygous patients should have already developed the disease, at least at the biochemical level. However, the number of heterozygous subjects in our family is quite limited, and assuming that the penetrance of low transforming RET mutations may be incomplete, these subjects might develop the MTC in the future. The follow-up with annual clinical and biochemical evaluation of the heterozygous gene carriers will provide additional information regarding the potential of this novel mutation to promote MTC development.
RET gene mutations at codon 883 have been previously described in only four unrelated cases of MEN 2B and one sporadic MTC (24, 25, 26). However, the nucleotide mutation in these cases (GCT to TTT) was different from the present case (GCT to ACT) and resulted in a different amino acid change. In the previously reported cases, the MTC had an aggressive clinical behavior, especially if compared with the present case, which was definitively cured by total thyroidectomy. It is well known that different RET gene mutations show various degrees of transforming activity (27, 28), and, in particular, all noncysteine RET mutations are usually associated with a less aggressive phenotype (7). It is possible to postulate that the new mutation (Ala vs. Thr) has the lowest transforming activity among all the noncysteine known mutations. The simultaneous presence of the mutation in both alleles might increase the transforming activity of the RET mutated allele not more counterbalanced by the wild type. Unfortunately, the transfection assay did not demonstrate any in vitro transforming activity of the new mutation. Nevertheless, this experiment cannot distinguish the homozygous from heterozygous status, and the question whether these two conditions may have different biological consequences remains to be answered. To validate this hypothesis, the levels of expression of mRNA derived from the mutant and wild-type alleles should be evaluated, but, at least for the moment, thyroid tissues from heterozygous subjects are not available.
RET mutations affecting one allele associated with somatic LOH of the other RET allele have been reported in three sporadic MTC cases (29, 30) and one MEN 2A case (31). The sequence analysis of the RET gene exons 1011 and 1316 of our index case did not reveal any abnormality in the size of PCR fragments, which excluded the possibility of a small deletion. Furthermore, we ruled out the possibility of large losses of DNA in this chromosomal region by FISH analysis that used a probe spanning the entire RET gene. All nuclei showed two distinct and equally strong signals, demonstrating the presence of two copies of RET gene, confirming the homozygous nature of this novel mutation. The analysis of informative RET gene polymorphisms also supported the hypothesis to be in front of a homozygous mutation rather than an LOH.
In conclusion, we identified a new germline RET gene mutation during a routine RET gene screening of an apparently sporadic case. This mutation showed a very low transforming activity as demonstrated by the absence of MTC phenotype in heterozygous subjects. The possibility to be dealing with a germline LOH has been excluded by FISH analysis for RET gene performed on lymphocytes derived from one homozygous patient.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: CCH, C cell hyperplasia; Ct, calcitonin; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; FMTC, familial MTC; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MEN, multiple endocrine neoplasia; MTC, medullary thyroid cancer; Pg, pentagastrin.
Received February 18, 2004.
Accepted August 5, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Elisei, B. Cosci, C. Romei, V. Bottici, G. Renzini, E. Molinaro, L. Agate, A. Vivaldi, P. Faviana, F. Basolo, et al. Prognostic Significance of Somatic RET Oncogene Mutations in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 682 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Margraf, R. Mao, and C. T. Wittwer Rapid Diagnosis of MEN2B Using Unlabeled Probe Melting Analysis and the LightCycler 480 Instrument J. Mol. Diagn., March 1, 2008; 10(2): 123 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Elisei, C. Romei, B. Cosci, L. Agate, V. Bottici, E. Molinaro, M. Sculli, P. Miccoli, F. Basolo, L. Grasso, et al. RET Genetic Screening in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer and Their Relatives: Experience with 807 Individuals at One Center J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2007; 92(12): 4725 - 4729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. B. de Groot, T. P. Links, J. T. M. Plukker, C. J. M. Lips, and R. M. W. Hofstra RET as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target in Sporadic and Hereditary Endocrine Tumors Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 535 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lesueur, A. Cebrian, A. Cranston, J. Leyland, T. M. Faid, M. R. Clements, M. Robledo, J. Whittaker, and B. A. J. Ponder Germline Homozygous Mutations at Codon 804 in the RET Protooncogene in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma/Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A Patients J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3454 - 3457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |