| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Pediatrics, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital (S.E.H., J.H., H.M., I.A.H.), Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 2QQ; Medical Research Council Cancer Cell Unit, Hutchison/Medical Research Council Research Center (I.S.S., N.C.), Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 2XZ; and Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology (J.W.S.), Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 2QH
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. I. A. Hughes, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 2QQ. E-mail: iah1000{at}cam.ac.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Morris (2), in his classic review of 82 cases of CAIS, noted that rudimentary anlagen of the internal genitalia may be present, including spermatic ducts. Several reports have since confirmed, but not explained, this observation (3, 4, 5). Most observers believe that such Wolffian structures have failed to completely regress, as indicated by the use of terms such as remnants. Because none of the reports provides objective information on the degree of development, it remains unclear whether all WD derivatives identified are indeed vestigial. It is important to distinguish between remnants and well-developed WD in relation to whether androgen responsiveness is maintained to some degree in CAIS. True development of the WD despite the presence of an AR mutation severe enough to prevent masculinization of the external genitalia would clearly be unexpected based on the dogma derived from the studies by Jost (1).
This study was designed to ascertain WD development in a large group of CAIS patients. A detailed histological analysis of gonadal material removed from 33 patients in whom an AR mutation had been identified was undertaken, and the findings were compared with internal genital development in normal male fetuses. We report the presence of well developed epididymides and vasa deferentia in a group of CAIS patients with substitution mutations in the AR ligand-binding domain (LBD). It is proposed that this shows evidence for residual activity of mutant ARs in vivo, and we suggest a further subclassification of androgen insensitivity.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Thirty-three patients with CAIS were selected from the Cambridge Intersex Database. All had a 46,XY karyotype and normal female external genitalia, as assessed by experienced pediatric endocrinologists or gynecologists. In each case a mutation in the AR gene had been identified by direct sequencing. Mutations were described using the numbering convention of Lubahn et al. (6). Duplication of exon B in patients 120, 229, and 231 was detected by RNA extraction from genital skin fibroblasts using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Paisley, UK), followed by RT using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and amplification of the AR cDNA using two primer pairs: AR1 forward, GATAGCTACTCCGGACCTTA; AR1 reverse, CATCTGGTCGTCCACGTGTA; AR2 forward, ACAGCTTGTACACGTGGTCA; and AR2 reverse, TAACAGGCAGAAGACATCTGA. PCR products of abnormal size were sequenced. Gonadectomy had been performed in all patients.
Histological analysis
Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides of the gonads from all patients were obtained for review. Archival slides from nine male fetuses aged between 16 and 20 wk gestation, retained from postmortem studies, were used as controls of normal WD development. The peritesticular area was examined for the presence of an epididymis or vas deferens. If tubes of Wolffian origin were found that were too underdeveloped or too few to fit the description of an epididymis or vas deferens (7), these were classified as Wolffian remnants. These tubules were similar to the vestigial WD that can be found in females (8). The observers were blinded to the genotype of the patients. Any case with contentious histology was examined by three individuals, one of whom is a consultant pathologist. Luminal diameter, epithelial cell height, and size of the muscular layer of the epididymis and vas deferens were measured using an Olympus BX41 microscope linked to image analysis software (AnalySIS, Olympus UK, London, UK).
Western blots
Fibroblast lines established from genital skin biopsies, when available, were grown as previously described (9). Cell lysates (50 µg total protein/lane) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Chalfont St. Giles, UK). AR protein was detected with primary antibody F 39.4.1 (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA) or AR(N-20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (DakoCytomation, Ely, UK) and ECL Plus Blotting Detection Reagents (Amersham Biosciences) were used according to the manufacturers instructions. Telomerase-immortalized human genital skin fibroblasts, BJ1 (BD Clontech, Oxford, UK), served as a positive control.
Site-directed mutagenesis
Mutations Y223X, deletion F582, G724D, and D864N were introduced into the wild-type AR cDNA vector pSVAR (10) by site-directed mutagenesis using a two-stage PCR as described previously (11). Mutations L700M and D732N were introduced into wild-type pSVAR using a QuikChange XL kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions. Sequencing confirmed the presence of the desired mutation and the absence of PCR-induced errors. A765T had previously been recreated (12). Nucleotide changes for each case are described in Table 1
.
|
COS-1 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 105 cells/well in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, charcoal stripped as described previously (13), 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine (all from Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO), and 1x MEM nonessential amino acids (Invitrogen Life Technologies). After 24 h cells were transfected with 15 ng pSVAR (wild-type or mutant), 500 ng pGRE-luciferase (an androgen- and glucocorticoid-responsive firefly luciferase reporter vector) (14), 25 ng pRLTK, a Renilla luciferase vector used as an internal control for transfection efficiency (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), and 1.22 µg salmon sperm DNA/well using calcium precipitation. Sixteen hours after transfection, fresh medium with 0, 1, or 10 nM mibolerone (17-hydroxy-7,17-dimethylestr-4-en-3-one; Steraloids, Inc., Wilton, NH) was added. After an additional 24 h, cells were harvested in lysis buffer [25 mM glycylglycine (pH 7.8), 15 mM MgSO4, 4 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X, and 1 mM dithiothreitol]. Luciferase assays were performed with reagents from NanoLight Technology (Pinetop, AZ), and the ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase was measured using a Turner TD-20/20 luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). Three independent experiments were performed, each in triplicate. In each experiment, values were normalized to the average ratio obtained for wild-type AR with 10 nM mibolerone.
Statistical analysis
Comparisons of luminal diameter, epithelial cell height, and size of the muscular layer of epididymis and vas deferens in CAIS patients and normal male fetuses were assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences were considered significant at P
0.05.
Ethics
Local research ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained for the use of patient samples as part of a sexual development disorders research program. Separate local research ethics committee approval was obtained for the use of slides of fetal gonads retained from postmortem examinations with parental consent.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All 33 patients included in the study had normal female external genitalia, with no sign of clitoromegaly. Many patients were prepubertal at the time of the study, but of those who were postpubertal, information about pubic hair development was available in three cases. Patient 604 (with mutation D864G) showed no pubic hair, whereas patients 101 (V866M) and 502 (D864N) had pubic hair development (Tanner stages P5 and P34, respectively). Testes were inguinal in 20 cases, abdominal in five cases, unilaterally inguinal and unilaterally abdominal in five cases, and labial in one case, and the position was unknown in two patients. All had undergone gonadectomy at ages ranging from 1 month to 19 yr (median, 8 yr; Table 1
). Twenty-six different AR mutations had been identified in these 33 patients (Table 1
). Family history was positive in 76% of individuals, negative in 15%, and unknown in 9%.
Histological analysis
Screening of the paratesticular area revealed the presence of well developed epididymides and/or vasa deferentia in 14 cases (42%; Table 1
). The epididymides showed the typical characteristics of a highly coiled duct lined by tall columnar cells, whereas the vasa deferentia had a typical slightly folded mucosa and thick muscular coat consisting of three layers (Fig. 1
, AD). These characteristics appeared to have developed to a greater extent in the CAIS patients than in the normal male 16- to 20-wk-old fetuses used for comparison (Fig. 1
, E and F, note the difference in magnification). In nine cases (27%) no WD derivatives were identified. The remaining 10 cases (30%) had Wolffian remnants. These structures resembled fetal WD, but they were fewer in number (Fig. 1
, G and H).
|
|
There was a clear difference between the type of AR mutation found in CAIS patients with well developed WD and those without well developed WD (Fig. 3
). Frameshift mutations, premature stop codons, and mutations in the DNA-binding domain (DBD) were associated with the absence of well-developed WD, whereas all patients with a well developed epididymis and/or vas deferens had a single amino acid substitution in the AR LBD. However, some single amino acid substitution mutations in the LBD (D695N, A765T, D864G, and V889M) were associated with the absence of an epididymis or vas deferens, as was the double mutation F856L and S865P. The type of mutation and the presence of WD were not related to the position of the gonads.
|
Western blots performed on genital skin fibroblasts from 11 patients with several types of mutations showed normal AR expression in those with single amino acid substitutions or deletions (Table 1
). No AR could be detected in fibroblasts from patients with premature stop codons. Two patients had a duplication of the first DBD exon (exon B), thereby creating a frameshift. In fibroblasts from these patients, a very faint band was detected in some experiments, suggesting the presence of a minimal amount of normally spliced AR.
Functional analysis of mutant ARs
The results of transactivation assays showed that the activity of all mutant ARs was impaired in the presence of 1 nM mibolerone, confirming that these mutations cause androgen insensitivity (Fig. 4A
). In the presence of 10 nM mibolerone, four of the five ARs with LBD substitution mutations (L700M, G724D, D732N, and D864N) had transcriptional activity similar to that of the wild-type AR. However, a premature stop codon (Y223X), a single amino acid deletion in the DBD (deletion F582), and one of the five substitution mutations in the LBD (A765T) completely abolished transcriptional activity. This was not due to the absence of AR protein, as a Western blot of the transfected cells showed that all mutant ARs were expressed (Fig. 4B
). The level of activity of each mutant AR varied between experiments and appeared to correlate with variation in expression levels of the transfected ARs. However, the four mutant ARs that showed residual activity did so consistently in all experiments.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As epididymides and vasa deferentia were only found in patients with single amino acid substitutions in the LBD, residual function of these receptors may be responsible for stimulating WD development. We confirmed by Western blotting that ARs with single amino acid substitutions were expressed in genital skin fibroblasts. In contrast, more severe mutations, such as premature stop codons, associated with the absence of an epididymis or vas deferens, lead to undetectable AR levels. Others have found a similar relationship between the type of mutation and AR expression (4, 18). The amount of normally spliced AR in genital skin fibroblasts from patients with a duplication of exon B was close to the detection limit of the assay; it was only visible in some experiments. This minimal amount of AR is presumably not sufficient to cause masculinization of the internal or external genitalia.
Functional studies showed that a premature stop codon (Y223X) and an amino acid deletion from the DBD (deletion F582) abolished transcriptional activity despite expression of the mutant ARs in COS-1 cells. One of the five LBD mutants tested (A765T) also failed to respond to mibolerone. All three mutations were associated with the absence of epididymides and vasa deferentia. However, the other four ARs with substitution mutations in the LBD (L700M, G724D, D732N, and D864N), found in patients with an epididymis and vas deferens, showed activity similar to that of the wild-type AR in the presence of 10 nM mibolerone. With low concentrations of androgen, the activity of the mutants was reduced compared with that of the wild-type AR, suggesting that although the mutations do affect AR function, the defect can be overcome in the presence of high concentrations of androgen.
The synthetic androgen mibolerone was used for these experiments rather than the natural ligand testosterone, because testosterone is metabolized by COS-1 cells (19). Consequently, high concentrations of testosterone are necessary to induce AR activity in COS-1 cells. However, 1 µM testosterone as well as 100 nM 5
-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) can activate the ARs with substitution mutations in the LBD to the same extent as 10 nM mibolerone (Hannema, S. E., unpublished observation), indicating that this is not a ligand-specific effect.
In this study seven mutant ARs were recreated for functional analysis. Other mutations identified in the 33 patients included in this study have been recreated and studied by other groups. Mutant R615H, affecting the DBD, is inactive in the presence of 10 nM DHT (20) and is associated with the absence of epididymides and vasa deferentia. Similarly, two LBD substitution mutations, D864G and S865P, which abolish AR activity in response to androgens (11, 21) also lead to absent WD development. The following LBD mutations, most of which were associated with well developed WD, were found to have residual activity: D695N (28% of wild-type activity with 10 nM R1881, a synthetic androgen) (13), M780I (100% activity with 3 nM R1881) (14), R855H (79% activity with 2 nM mibolerone) (22), V866M (79% activity with 4 nM mibolerone) (23), V889M (89% activity with 50 nM mibolerone) (24), and L907F (38% activity with 10 nM mibolerone) (12). A comparison of the mutant AR activity levels is not possible because of nonuniform experimental conditions between the various studies, but it is clear that the mutant ARs are androgen responsive. No functional studies have been performed on D690V, R710T, and P723S. Taken together these observations strongly suggest that most mutant ARs with LBD substitution mutations may respond to androgens in vivo to stimulate WD development in patients who are assumed to be completely insensitive to androgens.
Whether this residual AR activity is also responsible for pubic hair development is not clear. Quigley et al. (25) and Sinnecker et al. (26) suggested that the presence of pubic hair should be regarded as evidence of some degree of androgen responsiveness and proposed a separate category, AIS grade 6 and type 5a, respectively, for patients with female external genitalia and pubic hair. However, others do not take pubic hair development into account when determining the degree of masculinization (27). Boehmer et al. (4) reported a patient with a frameshift mutation with pubic hair Tanner stage P3. It is difficult to imagine residual AR activity with this type of mutation; therefore, it seems that pubic hair may develop independently from AR activity (4). In the three cases from whom we have information on pubic hair development, there is a correlation between the presence of well developed WD and the presence of pubic hair. However, because of the small number of cases from whom this information is available, it is not possible to say whether this is true in general.
It is interesting that only three LBD substitution mutations completely abolished AR activity in vivo and in vitro (A765T, D864G, and S865P). This suggests that these mutations have a particularly disruptive effect on the protein structure or on critical functional regions within the LBD. Examination of the crystal structures (28, 29) and model (30) of the AR LBD in part helps to rationalize the severity of these defects. However, it is inherently difficult to clearly differentiate between mutants that show a low level of residual activity and those that are totally inactive.
Significantly, none of the three amino acids causing total loss of function is in direct contact with the ligand. They are, however, all in highly ordered parts of the structure. Alanine 765 is completely buried and is in contact with residues in the loop between helixes 1 and 3 and in helix 3 (Fig. 5A
). The change from alanine to the larger and more polar threonine is stereochemically unfavorable and may perturb the structure of the ß-sheet on one side of the ligand-binding cavity. This might, in turn, affect ligand binding affinity or on/off rates, or conceivably perturb the folding of the LBD. Mutation of aspartic acid 864 to glycine (patient 604), but not asparagine (patient 502), also results in a total loss of function. This residue makes hydrogen bonds to the backbone amides of phenylalanine 916 and histidine 917, thus stabilizing the very C terminus of the LBD (Fig. 5B
). Mutation to glycine, but not to asparagine, would result in complete loss of these interactions and destabilization of the C terminus of the LBD. This suggests that this region of the protein has a critical functional role that remains to be fully understood. Mutation of the adjacent residue serine 865 to proline is also severely deleterious to protein function. The role of this residue is not as clear; however, we have noted previously that the proline substitution may perturb helix 10/11, and this might explain the severity of the phenotype (11).
|
It is noteworthy that WD have developed in some CAIS patients, whereas the external genitalia are not masculinized. This may be due to differences in local androgen concentrations to which the tissues have been exposed. The WD are attached to the testis, and several lines of evidence suggest that testosterone is secreted directly into the WD. In unilaterally castrated rabbit fetuses, the WD is only maintained on the unoperated side (1). Furthermore, when testicular insufficiency is induced in fetal rabbits by decapitation before sexual differentiation, the degree of underdevelopment increases along a gradient extending from the testis along the genital ducts (1). Additional evidence for diffusion of testosterone down the WD is provided by studies in which fluorescent androgen was injected into fetal mouse testis, showing rapid localization of fluorescence in the proximal and subsequently distal WD (31).
Testicular testosterone concentrations are very high in the fetus during the phase of WD stabilization. Between 12 and 15 wk gestation the testis contains between 500 and 5200 pg testosterone/mg wet tissue (32). If tissue density is assumed to be approximately 1 g/ml, then this equals about 1.718 µM. In infancy, the epididymal testosterone content is 30% that of testicular testosterone (33). As this percentage declines with age (34), the epididymal concentration may be even higher in the fetus. Thus, the local concentration of testosterone to which the WD are exposed is likely to be in the micromolar range.
The developing external genitalia, in contrast, are exposed to systemic levels of androgens. Serum testosterone reaches a peak in the fetus between 16 and 18 wk gestation when levels are 200600 ng/dl (35), equaling approximately 6.921 nM. Although testosterone is converted to DHT, which is 10 times more potent (19), in the external genitalia, AR stimulation is likely to be less intense than in the WD, where testosterone concentrations are probably more than 100-fold higher. However, other factors may play a role in the difference between development of the internal and external genitalia in CAIS patients, such as AR coactivators that may be specifically expressed in the WD.
Two patients in this series have residual mutant AR activity, but the WD do not seem to have developed (patient 150 with mutation V889M and patient 902 with mutation D695N). It is possible that epididymides and vasa deferentia were present, but were not included in the tissue samples available for review. Sometimes an epididymis, but not a vas deferens, or a vas deferens, but not an epididymis, was found (Table 1
). Because these structures are contiguous in development, it suggests that sampling may be incomplete in some cases. However, the absence of epididymides and vasa deferentia may be due to other factors. Testicular testosterone concentrations at the time of WD stabilization show a wide variation between individuals (5005200 pg/mg tissue) (32). Epididymal testosterone concentrations are closely correlated to testicular concentrations (33); therefore, a similar wide range may be expected in testosterone concentrations in the WD. If an AR mutation is present, concentrations toward the lower end of the range may not be sufficient to stimulate growth of the WD. Alternatively, other unknown factors that vary between individuals may influence WD development. These may be the same factors that underlie variations in the degree of undermasculinization of the external genitalia between individuals, and even siblings, who have the same AR mutation (36).
The finding of epididymides and vasa deferentia in patients diagnosed with CAIS poses a problem with the classification of AIS. Because there is evidence of AR activity in vivo, it is incorrect to say that these patients are completely insensitive to androgens. However, the term partial androgen insensitivity is historically associated with partial masculinization of the external genitalia. We therefore suggest using the term severe androgen insensitivity syndrome to describe patients with normal female external genitalia but male internal genitalia.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: AIS, Androgen insensitivity syndrome; AR, androgen receptor; CAIS, complete androgen insensitivity syndrome; DBD, DNA-binding domain; DHT, 5
-dihydrotestosterone; LBD, ligand-binding domain; WD, Wolffian duct.
Received April 23, 2004.
Accepted August 12, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-dihydrotestosterone interact differently with the androgen receptor to enhance transcription of the MMTV-CAT reporter gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 88:1522[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Welsh, R. M. Sharpe, M. Walker, L. B. Smith, and P. T. K. Saunders New Insights into the Role of Androgens in Wolffian Duct Stabilization in Male and Female Rodents Endocrinology, May 1, 2009; 150(5): 2472 - 2480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cools, S. L. S. Drop, K. P. Wolffenbuttel, J. W. Oosterhuis, and L. H. J. Looijenga Germ Cell Tumors in the Intersex Gonad: Old Paths, New Directions, Moving Frontiers Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 468 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |