| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine (J.G.E., S.G.T.); Graduate Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Health (S.G.T.); and Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (S.E.), University of Toronto; and Freeman Center of Endocrine Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital (L.K., S.E.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Shereen Ezzat, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, #437 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5. E-mail: sezzat{at}mtsinai.on.ca.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10% within the preceding 12 months) despite antiretroviral therapy, to receive 3 months of rhGH (6 mg/d) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. We assessed Q (determined noninvasively using CO2 rebreathing), and subsequently a-vO2 difference, from Q-VO2 relationships. At study entry, the mean slope (8.1 ± 1.0 liters/min·1-liter increase in VO2) and intercept (3.1 ± 1.3 liters/min), generated from each patients Q-VO2 relationship, were greater and lower, respectively, than those reported for healthy individuals (6.0 and 4.0, respectively), thereby indicating a deficit in the a-vO2 difference. After 3 months of rhGH treatment, the slope decreased to 7.0, and the intercept increased to 3.5. After 1 month of rhGH treatment, the a-vO2 difference (at a VO2 of 1250 ml/min) significantly (P < 0.05) increased (17.1 ± 8.9%) from baseline (9.92 ± 0.51 ml/dl) and remained elevated (10.39 ± 0.48 ml/dl) after 3 months of treatment. No significant changes were seen with placebo. Therefore, treatment with rhGH leads to an improvement in peripheral muscle oxygen extraction-utilization and the Q-VO2 relationship during exercise in patients with HIV-associated wasting despite antiretroviral therapy. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The beneficial anabolic effects of recombinant human GH (rhGH) in a variety of age-related and non-age-related catabolic conditions (31, 32, 33, 34) has prompted interest in the use of this treatment in the area of HIV-associated wasting. Improvements in physiological and functional performance are particularly well substantiated in patients with adult GH deficiency treated with rhGH (35, 36, 37, 38, 39). Similarly, rhGH administration in patients with HIV improves exercise capacity (40, 41), in part from an increase in lean body mass (LBM) (41). However, it remains uncertain whether other GH-mediated physiological mechanisms are responsible for the improvement in exercise performance.
We present a randomized, double-blinded, placebocontrolled study of the effect of rhGH treatment on the physiological determinants of cardiorespiratory capacity in patients with HIV-associated wasting. We evaluated the cardiac output-oxygen consumption (Q-VO2) relationship and its response to rhGH treatment as well as the impact of this treatment on the arteriovenous oxygen difference (a-vO2 difference) response to submaximal exercise testing in these patients.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fourteen patients (2070 yr old) with documented HIV-associated wasting, defined as unintentional weight loss of at least 10% over the preceding 12 months, were selected for inclusion in the study. Patients had to have been receiving a stable regimen of antiretroviral therapy for at least 1 month before study entry and were to continue with the same treatment for the duration of the study. Patients must not have had rhGH treatment for at least 2 yr or received systemic glucocorticoids for at least 6 months before study entry. Those already receiving androgenic agents had to be receiving them for at least 6 continuous months before entry and were to continue for the duration of the study.
Patients were excluded from the study if any of the following criteria applied: 1) presence of chronic severe kidney disease (serum creatinine,
2.25x the upper limit of the normal range and/or repeated positive tests for hematuria and/or proteinuria); 2) presence of chronic severe liver disease (serum glutymal aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase
2.5x the upper limit of the normal range); 3) presence of impaired glucose tolerance (fasting glucose,
110 mg/dl); 4) presence or history of malignancy; 5) unstable hypertension (systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg); 6) acute or severe illness during the 6 months before study entry; 7) presence of any concomitant disease, intercurrent illness, or resultant therapy that could interfere with the patients compliance with the study; or 8) known active drug addiction, including alcoholism or use of drugs for nontherapeutic purposes.
Study design
The study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics review committees. After written and informed consent was obtained, the referred patients underwent a prestudy evaluation for eligibility, which was completed within 1 month of proposed study entry and included a physical examination (i.e. weight, height, electrocardiogram, chest x-ray, routine hematology, blood biochemistry and urinalysis, and routine ophthalmology) and medical history assessment. Eligible patients were then studied for 9 months in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-period, cross-over trial (Fig. 1
) from November 2001 to June 2003. Treatment consisted of rhGH or placebo, which was self-administered as a nightly sc injection, at a dose of 6 mg/d. The rhGH (Serostim) was provided by Serono, Inc. (Rockland, MA) and was identical to placebo in preparation and packaging. The two-period x two-group trial was an A/B B/A design. Participants were randomized to receive either drug A (rhGH) or drug B (placebo) for 3 months (period 1). After a 3-month washout period, participants crossed over to receive the alternative treatment for 3 months (period 2). Participants randomized to group 1 received drug A (rhGH) in period 1 and drug B in period 2 (A/B); the treatment order for group 2 was B/A. Compliance was assessed from returned vials, self-reporting cards, and measurements of circulating IGF-I levels. Dose reduction was permitted if side-effects were alleged to be consequent of rhGH treatment. All measurements were made during six major study visits (months 0, 1, 3, 6, 7, and 9). Patients attended the Exercise Physiology Laboratory at 0900 h after an overnight fast. Baseline measurements (months 0 and 6) preceded each treatment period, and identical procedures were undertaken for both periods. In addition, 2 wk after the start of each period, patients were clinically examined for safety (i.e. routine hematology, blood biochemistry and urinalysis, and monitoring of adverse events). Participants were asked not to alter their physical activity throughout the study; this was monitored by the use of patient diaries. The randomization code was computer-generated at month 0, after baseline measurements were completed. Unblinding occurred after full completion of the study.
|
Circulating IGF-I. Serum levels of GH (Quest Diagnostics, Inc., San Juan Capistrano, CA) and IGF-I (Diagnostics Systems Laboratories, Inc., Webster, TX) were measured using immunoassays according to the manufacturers protocols.
Body composition assessment. Body mass and stature were measured to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.5 cm, respectively, with light clothing and without shoes. Body mass index was calculated as body mass divided by the square of stature. Body composition (whole body) estimates of LBM and total body fat (TBF) were derived by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry using a DPX-L Plus bone densitometer (model 2288; Lunar Corp., Madison, WI).
Cardiorespiratory performance. All exercise tests were performed on a Trackmaster treadmill (model TMX425; Full Vision, Inc., Newton, KS) and assessed by the same trained researcher. Cardiorespiratory performance was determined using a continuous, progressive, pseudo-ramp (small step increases) protocol to a symptom-limited maximum. This was a walking protocol for all patients, and the initial treadmill work rate was based on the level of physical activity and fitness of each patient. Expired gas was analyzed by open-circuit spirometry using a MOXUS Modular VO2 System (AEI Technologies, Naperville, IL). Mixed expired gas was sampled downstream from a 4.2-liter mixing chamber and analyzed breath by breath. Data were processed and expressed in 20-sec averages for heart rate (HR), VO2, carbon dioxide production (VCO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER: VCO2/VO2), ventilation (VE), respiratory frequency, and tidal volume (VT). HR was determined using a Polar monitor (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland), and blood pressure was measured every 2 min by automated auscultation (Tango Exercise Stress BP Monitor; SunTech Medical Instruments, Inc., Morrisville, NC). Measures included maximum oxygen uptake (VO2peak), ventilatory threshold (VeT), and maximum HR (HRpeak). VO2peak was simply the highest VO2 achieved for a presumed maximal exercise effort. A noninvasive method was used to estimate VeT from ventilatory equivalents for oxygen (VE/VO2) and carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2) as previously described (42). VeT was identified as VO2 at the point of inflection where VE/VO2 was lowest and then increased progressively with additional increases in treadmill work rate while VE/VCO2 reached a plateau or declined. The modified V-slope method (43), in which VCO2 is plotted as a function of VO2 and noting where VCO2 begins to increase out of proportion to VO2, was used to support the estimate of VeT by ventilatory equivalents. Two trained researchers, blinded to treatment, independently and randomly evaluated the graphs and were able to clearly identify VeT. The discrepancy in VeT between the two researchers was less than or equal to 10% in all cases, and the mean value was taken as the VeT. The HRpeak was compared with the maximal predicted HR, which was calculated as 220 minus age in years.
Q-VO2 relationship. A stage 2 exercise test (44) with two submaximal exercise levels, corresponding to 40% and 60% of baseline VO2peak, was used to determine the Q-VO2 relationship and other associated variables for each patient. Each submaximal exercise level was sustained for 6 min, with a 6-min rest interval in between. At each level, Q was determined noninvasively by the indirect Fick CO2 equilibration method. The rebreathing apparatus consisted of an inflatable balloon-type, three-way valve assembly actuated by an automated controller (Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO) and attached to a 5-liter latex rubber rebreathing bag. A Nafion sample line, originating from the sampling port of the valve, was connected to the MOXUS Modular VO2 System. Attached to a three-way stopcock were the rebreathing bag, a 3-liter syringe (for the purpose of controlling the volume of gas injected into the bag), and a vacuum (for the purpose of emptying the bag). The syringe was also connected to tanks containing the rebreathing gases. Before rebreathing, VCO2 (as well as VO2 and VT) was measured in a steady state while patients inspired room air, and the arterial partial pressure of CO2 (PaCO2) was estimated from the partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2). The rebreathing bag was then filled with concentrated gas (1.52.0 times the patients VT), ranging from 10.512.0% CO2 in oxygen (44), and the valve assembly was activated to commence rebreathing. During rebreathing, patients breathed in and out of the bag until the partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) reached an equilibrium plateau. Mixed venous PCO2 (PvCO2) was then estimated from this equilibrium PCO2 (PEqCO2). An arterial oxygen saturation of 95% was assumed. Mixed venous and arterial CO2 concentrations (CvCO2 and CaCO2, respectively) were estimated by the following equations (44): CvCO2 = 10.38(PvCO20.396)[PvCO2 = 0.76(PEqCO2) + 11] and CaCO2 = 10.38(PaCO20.396)[PaCO2 = 5.5 + 0.90(PETCO2) 0.0021(VT). Cardiac output was then solved using the Fick equation: Q = VCO2/(CvCO2 CaCO2).
Each patients Q-VO2 relationship was compared with the established relationship for healthy subjects (44): Q = 4.0 + 6.0 VO2 (liters/min), where 4.0 and 6.0 represent the intercept and slope, respectively. Q corresponding to a VO2 of 1250 ml/min(Q1250), was interpolated from each patients Q-VO2 relationship. The a-vO2 difference at this VO2 was calculated as the ratio of VO2/Q, and expressed as milliliters per deciliter. HR corresponding to the same VO2 of 1250 ml/min (HR1250) was interpolated from each patients HR-VO2 relationship, and stroke volume (SV) was calculated as the ratio of Q/HR and expressed in milliliters.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat for Windows (version 2.03; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM unless otherwise stated. All measures were examined for equality of carryover effects, using a two-sample t test of patient totals for period 1 plus period 2 values at P < 0.10 (45). When there was no evidence of a carryover effect, the two patient groups were combined, and repeated measures ANOVA was used to examine within- and between-treatment differences from baseline to 1 and 3 months of placebo and rhGH treatment. Diagnostic tests of normality and equal variance preceded repeated measures ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were made using Student-Newman-Keuls tests. The level of significance was P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria and gave informed consent to participate in this study. One patient, from group 1, withdrew before completion of the study because of arthralgias and headaches, and another patient, also from group 1, died from a cerebrovascular accident during the washout period. Therefore, 12 patients completed the 9-month trial. One patient, from group 1, did not complete measures at the 1 month visit and neither did another patient, from group 2, at the 7-month visit. Blinded dose reduction to 3 mg/d was required in four patients because of side-effects (arthralgias) during the rhGH treatment period. Eight patients were cigarette smokers. There were no significant differences among baseline characteristics (Table 1
) between groups 1 (treatment order A/B) and 2 (treatment order B/A). There was also no significant carryover effect for each of the outcome measures. All patients had been receiving a stable regimen of antiretroviral therapy for at least 1 month before study entry and continued it throughout the course of the study (Table 2
).
|
|
Circulating IGF-I concentrations at baseline were within the age-matched normative range in 92% (11 of 12) of the patients. One patient had an IGF-I concentration (277 µg/liter) above the upper limit of normal (256 µg/liter). IGF-I concentrations significantly increased (P < 0.05) from 177.0 ± 16.1 µg/liter (rhGH period baseline) to 717.0 ± 122.5 µg/liter after 1 month of rhGH treatment. Due to the dose reduction necessitated by side-effects (arthralgias), IGF-I levels declined after 3 months of active treatment to 430.5 ± 45.9 µg/liter (P < 0.05), but remained elevated above baseline (P < 0.05). IGF-I levels remained stable during placebo treatment (213.6 ± 27.8 and 189.8 ± 21.7 µg/liter, after 1 and 3 months respectively; Fig. 2A
). At baseline, red blood cell counts were slightly low in 58% (seven of 12) of the patients, yet hematocrits and hemoglobin concentrations were in normal range in 92% (11 of 12) of the patients. There were no significant changes in any hematological measures with either treatment.
|
Body mass significantly increased from the rhGH period baseline (70.0 ± 2.6 kg) after 1 month (72.2 ± 3.2 kg; P < 0.001) and remained elevated after 3 months (71.5 ± 2.7 kg; P = 0.039) of rhGH treatment. The decrease in body mass from 1 to 3 months was also significant (P = 0.011). Body mass remained unchanged after 1 and 3 months of placebo treatment (69.6 ± 3.0 and 69.0 ± 3.0 kg, respectively).
Treatment with rhGH resulted in a significant increase from baseline in LBM (P < 0.001) after 1 month (8.6 ± 1.4%) and 3 months (6.1 ± 1.0%). This was paralleled by significant decreases (P < 0.05) in TBF (21.7 ± 5.8% and 22.6 ± 5.8% at 1 and 3 months, respectively). No significant changes were noted in LBM or TBF after treatment with placebo. Differences between the effects of placebo and rhGH on body mass and LBM were also significant (P < 0.01).
Cardiorespiratory performance
At baseline, the VO2peak (33.6 ± 1.5 ml/kg·min) was significantly lower (P = 0.015) than age-specific normative values (38.6 ± 0.5 ml/kg·min) (46), and the HRpeak (159.3 ± 2.9 beats/min) was 9.8 ± 2.3% lower (P = 0.002) than the age-predicted maximum. After 3 months of treatment with rhGH, nonsignificant increases in the VO2peak (34.9 ± 2.0 ml/kg·min) and the HRpeak (160.6 ± 4.6 beats/min) were observed. In contrast, there was a nonsignificant decrease in the VO2peak (31.3 ± 2.1 ml/kg·min) and the HRpeak (151.6 ± 5.1 beats/min) after 3 months of placebo. However, the differences between the effects of placebo and rhGH on the VO2peak and HRpeak were significant after 3 months (P < 0.05; Fig. 2
, B and C). The HRpeak exceeded 90% of the age-predicted maximal HR only during active treatment. The VeT at baseline (17.9 ± 0.9 ml/kg·min) was approximately 24% lower (P < 0.001) than that predicted for healthy sedentary males of similar age, body mass, and stature (47). The VeT significantly improved after 1 month (18.9 ± 1.1 ml/kg·min; P < 0.05) and 3 months (19.8 ± 1.3 ml/kg·min; P < 0.05) of rhGH treatment. No statistically significant changes were noted after treatment with placebo. Differences between the effects of placebo and rhGH on VeT were statistically significant (P < 0.05) as well (Fig. 2D
). The RER at VO2peak did not change significantly after either treatment and did not exceed 1.15 at any of the time points.
Q-VO2 relationship and a-vO2 difference
Data for VO2 and Q at the 40% and 60% of VO2peak exercise levels during placebo and rhGH treatment periods are presented in Table 3
. The significant increase in VO2 at both exercise levels after 1 month of rhGH treatment reflects increased oxygen consumption on account of the rhGH-induced increase in body mass. At baseline, the mean slope and intercept, generated from each patients Q-VO2 relationship, were 8.1 ± 1.0 liters/min/1-liter increase in VO2 and 3.1 ± 1.3 liters/min, respectively. After 3 months of rhGH treatment, the slope and intercept decreased and increased, respectively, albeit the changes were not statistically significant. Conversely, the slope and intercept tended to increase and decrease, respectively, after treatment with placebo (Table 4
).
|
|
6 beats/min; P = 0.051) was observed after 1 month of active treatment and was significantly greater than that observed with placebo (P = 0.012; Fig. 3C
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The a-vO2 difference depends on the extent of oxygen extraction from blood by muscle and its subsequent utilization. This, in turn, is influenced by the metabolic rate, regional distribution of peripheral flow, local muscle capillary density and perfusion, changes in the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve, and activity of muscle respiratory enzymes (44). Deficits among any of these factors give rise to impaired exercise performance.
Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), a cornerstone of antiretroviral therapy, have been shown to induce mitochondrial dysfunction and decrease mitochondrial enzyme function (49). Toxic mitochondrial myopathy caused by long-term therapy with zidovudine has been documented in vivo (20, 23, 24, 26, 29). The a-vO2 difference is significantly lower in patients taking NRTI compared with those using other antiretroviral agents (i.e. protease inhibitors and non-NRTI) (19). In our study approximately 92% of the patients were taking NRTI; 58% were receiving zidovudine in particular. Because the rate of oxygen utilization is dependent on normal mitochondrial enzyme function (50), the decreased a-vO2 difference and aerobic capacity in our patients may have been due to a nucleoside analog-induced diminution of oxidative enzyme function.
Impairment in the redistribution of central circulation to active tissue resulting from autonomic dysfunction is another potential mechanism for the reduced muscle oxygen extraction-utilization observed in this patient population. Autonomic dysfunction has been reported in HIV-infected patients (51, 52, 53, 54); however, it could not be specifically elucidated using the approaches adopted in our current study.
We chose a dose (6 mg/d) that has been previously shown to be efficacious in improving body composition and exercise capacity among patients with HIV-associated wasting (40, 41). A major finding in our study was the significant increase in a-vO2 difference at a specified submaximal VO2, accompanied by an improvement in the Q-VO2 relationship, in response to GH treatment. Arthralgias, necessitating a halving of dose in nearly a third of our patients, were associated with a nearly 4-fold increase in IGF-I levels after 1 month of rhGH treatment. There was a significant reduction in IGF-I levels from 1 to 3 months of rhGH treatment, probably as a consequence of the rhGH dose reduction, paralleled by a reduction in a-vO2. It is plausible that treatment with rhGH at a dose of 6 mg/d is required to effect a significant response in a-vO2 difference during submaximal exercise in patients with HIV-associated wasting.
GH treatment stimulates erythropoiesis in adult GH deficiency (55) and may thus contribute to the increased exercise performance seen in these patients (36, 39). However, GH treatment did not alter red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and/or hematocrit in our patients. It remains unclear whether GH per se stimulates oxidative enzyme activity in skeletal muscle. In normal rats, the pharmacological use of GH does not improve either mitochondrial mass or the muscle oxidative properties of isolated mitochondria (56). Yet when combined with physical endurance training, GH administration increases skeletal muscle oxidative enzyme activity more than training alone in healthy elderly women (57). IGF-I stimulates differentiation of myoblasts by induction of myogenin gene expression (58). Moreover, myogenin induces a shift from glycolytic to oxidative metabolism in muscle (59). Thus, by stimulating IGF-I production, GH treatment may indirectly enhance myogenin expression and subsequent muscle oxidative activity in patients with HIV-associated wasting. Nevertheless, additional investigations examining muscle oxygen extraction-utilization and mitochondrial oxidative enzyme activity in GH-treated sarcopenic patients are warranted.
The observed increase in VO2peak during GH treatment should be interpreted with caution. Attainment of an RER greater than 1.15 and/or a plateau in oxygen uptake despite increasing workload confirms that maximal effort has been elicited during graded exercise testing (46). In our study RER did not exceed 1.15 at any of the time points, and a plateau was not consistently seen; therefore, the improvement in VO2peak should not be readily accepted as a valid marker of improved aerobic capacity in our patients. In the majority of our patients, exercise cessation resulted from local muscle fatigue before an RER of 1.15 or a plateau in oxygen uptake could be attained.
VeT, which is observed at a submaximal work rate, may be a more useful indicator of aerobic capacity in HIV-infected patients. VeT is an effort-independent physiological measure of ability to perform submaximal, prolonged activity. It corresponds to the point at which pulmonary ventilation disproportionately increases during graded exercise in its relation to oxygen consumption at about the same time blood lactate begins to accumulate (50). Exercise at intensities above VeT results in metabolic acidosis, hyperventilation, impaired muscle contraction, and, inevitably, an inability to sustain performance (60). Muscle fiber type, blood flow, capillary density, mitochondrial size and number, and oxidative enzyme concentrations play integral roles in determining VeT (50). The increase in a-vO2 difference in our patients, which was consistently measured at a VO2 corresponding to baseline VeT (1250 ml/min), paralleled the increase in VeT after 1 month of rhGH treatment. However, after 3 months of active treatment, the a-vO2 difference remained elevated above baseline, but not as significantly as VeT. Recent results from our laboratory have shown that GH-induced increases in LBM are associated with improvements in VeT (61). Therefore, the GH-induced improvement in a-vO2 difference during exercise may be reliant on a much greater IGF-I response to GH than that required for improvements in VeT and LBM.
The a-vO2 difference at a VO2 of 1250 ml/min significantly increased after 1 month of rhGH treatment; however, the change compared with that after placebo treatment was not statistically significant. The possibility exists that the sample size (n = 12) was inadequate, perhaps rendering the study not powerful or sensitive enough to show a difference. Therefore, the possibility of a false negative result or type II error with respect to a-vO2 difference cannot be ruled out. Retrospective power analysis revealed a statistical power less than 0.80.
In the present study cardiorespiratory exercise testing, and the expired gas analyses thereof, elucidated reduced extraction and utilization of oxygen by peripheral muscle tissue in patients with HIV-associated wasting. GH treatment transiently corrected this, subsequently improving the Q-VO2 relationship in our patients. Therefore, the beneficial effect of GH on physiological performance attests to its potential ergogenicity in patients with HIV-associated wasting despite the use of antiretroviral therapy.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 5, 2004.
Accepted July 8, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. G. Esposito, S. G. Thomas, L. Kingdon, and S. Ezzat Anabolic growth hormone action improves submaximal measures of physical performance in patients with HIV-associated wasting Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2005; 289(3): E494 - E503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |