| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
University Department of Growth and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet (M.C., A.M.A., K.M.M., N.E.S., A.J.); University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev Hospital (K.V., T.L., J.F.-L., J.L.); and Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen (T.S.), DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Marla Chellakooty, M.D., University Department of Growth and Reproduction, GR 5064, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: rh04632{at}rh.dk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Placental GH, a product of the GH-V gene, predominantly expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast cells (4) of the placenta, is thought to be involved in the regulation of fetal growth (5). Maternal serum levels of placental GH increase throughout pregnancy from 7 wk gestation (6) until term and gradually replace the pulsatile pituitary GH secretion (7, 8). With the onset of labor and the removal of the placenta after childbirth, there is a rapid fall in serum placental GH levels (placental GH half-life, 15 min) (6). In contrast to pituitary GH, placental GH is secreted continuously (8), which permits evaluation of placental GH levels from a single measurement. Several cross-sectional studies have shown that in both normal and pathological pregnancies the rise in placental GH is associated with a rise in maternal IGF-I levels (9, 10) and that reduced levels of both placental GH and maternal IGF-I are seen in women with IUGR pregnancies (5). Placental GH is not detectable in the fetal circulation, but it is believed to influence fetal growth indirectly by regulating the maternal substrate supply to the fetus. The physiological role, however, may also include a direct influence on placental development through an autocrine or paracrine mechanism, as suggested by the presence of GH receptors in the placenta (11).
To our knowledge no longitudinal data exist on the progressive rise in placental GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 in relation to ultrasound assessment of intrauterine fetal growth in women with normal pregnancies. The aim of this study was 1) to evaluate the relationship of placental GH and maternal IGF-I with fetal growth, and b) to establish reference data for placental GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 throughout normal pregnancies based on longitudinal measurements.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the period of May 1999 to October 2001, 103 pregnant women were recruited consecutively from the first routine contact (between gestational wk 612) at a University Hospital in Copenhagen. After informed consent, all mothers were scheduled to have blood samples obtained approximately every 46 wk throughout pregnancy. All pregnant women were scheduled to have 3 ultrasound examinations. Eighty-nine women had normal singleton pregnancies and gave birth between 3742 wk gestation to newborns with birth weights above -2 SD (12). Thus, 14 women were excluded due to preterm birth or small for gestational age newborn (n = 4), postmaturity (n = 2), miscarriage (n = 1), or personal reasons (n = 7). A total of 650 blood samples were obtained (with an average of 7 samples/woman; range, 39). All women had normal placental function as assessed by umbilical artery pulsatility index. Information regarding mothers diseases, smoking, parity, parturition, and childbirth history were obtained from medical records during the course of pregnancy and after birth.
Ultrasound scan
One examiner performed all ultrasound examinations using an ultrasound color Doppler equipment (2102 Scanner, B-K Medical, Copenhagen, Denmark) with a convex abdominal array 2.55 MHz MFI (multifrequency imaging) probe. The test-retest coefficient (same observer same fetus) was 4.6% (13). All women had a dating scan at approximately 17 wk gestation (range, 1522). Fetal weight estimations were calculated at approximately 28 (range, 2733) and 33 (range, 3235) wk gestation from biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference using Warsofs equation (14).
Ethical aspects
The study was performed according to the Helsinki II Declaration and was approved by the local ethics committee and the Danish Registry Agency.
Laboratory methods
Nonfasting peripheral venous blood samples were taken from an antecubital vein between midmorning and early afternoon. Samples were separated by centrifugation and stored at -20 C until analysis.
Assays
Placental GH was measured in a solid phase 125I-labeled immunoradiometric assay (Biocode, Liege, Belgium) using two specific monoclonal antibodies as previously described (4). In our laboratory the intraassay coefficients of variation were less than 8% (at 24.6 ng/ml; n = 20) and 6.3% (at 5.0 ng/ml; n = 20), and the interassay coefficients of variation were 6.1% (at 4.1 ng/ml; n = 20), 9.7% (at 22.2 ng/ml; n = 20), and 8.1% (at 35.6 ng/ml; n = 20). The limit of detection was less than 0.1 ng/ml, defined as zero standard +3 SD.
IGF-I was measured in all subjects with a RIA originally described by Bang et al. (15) with some modifications. Serum was extracted by acid/ethanol and cryoprecipitated before analysis to remove interfering binding proteins using monoiodinated Tyr31-[125I]des-(13) IGF-I as radioligand (16). Inter- and intraassay variations were both below 11% in the range measured. The limit of detection was 21 ng/ml. IGFBP-3 was determined by RIA, as described by Blum et al. (17). IGFBP-3 was measured on unprocessed serum using a polyclonal rabbit antiserum and a purified human IGFBP-3 fragment as standard and radioligand. Reagents for the analysis were obtained from Mediagnost GmbH (Tubingen, Germany). Inter- and intraassay variations were 7.3% and 3.5%, respectively. The limit of detection was 300 ng/ml.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were carried out using the statistical package SPSS (version 11, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and SAS (version 6.12, SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Descriptive statistics are given as median values and ranges, and the study population is grouped according to gender of the fetus. Square root and log transformation were applied to all hormones values to improve the approximation of normal distribution and linearize relationships.
The reference charts were constructed by use of random effects models to account for correlation within each subject. We assumed that the individual developments were approximately piecewise linear with individual variation of slopes and intercepts. The fitted random effects models were validated, and data were transformed to obtain residuals that were approximately normal. Based on the effects model with estimates of residual variation as well as variation within subjects, we constructed the model-based reference charts.
A linear regression model, fitted on every subjects data over time was applied to yield a slope value representing the rate of change in hormone levels per unit of time (gestational age in days) with corresponding intercepts (baseline values). Slope values and intercepts were calculated on individual hormonal changes throughout gestation and on the change between 24.537.5 wk gestation, as this time window represents a period when fetal weight velocity is at its maximum (18). The maximal hormone levels as well as the difference between maximal hormone level and hormone concentration in the last blood sample for placental GH and IGF-I were calculated. To determine factors of influence on placental GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3, the slopes were used as dependent variables in linear regression analyses describing the increase in individual hormone levels throughout gestation. All models included smoking habits, maternal age, social-economic status, parity, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI; weight/height2), placental weight, and hormone levels (depending on model) as explanatory variables. Backward stepwise regression models were adopted to determine factors predicting changes in placental GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3. To describe the fetal growth rate, individual slopes were calculated from assessment of birth weight and two fetal weight estimations at approximately 28 and 33 wk of gestation. Fetal growth rate, birth weight, and placental weight were used as univariate dependent variables in linear regression models with the slope of placental GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 together with prepregnancy BMI, maternal age, smoking, parity, and fetal sex as explanatory variables. The intercepts of the biochemical markers were excluded because they were nonsignificant in these models. To determine whether placental GH or IGF-I had an influence on the time of parturition, maximal hormone values, the difference between maximal values and the last taken blood sample (
value), and gestational age at maximal concentrations were used as explanatory variables in a regression model, with gestational age at birth as the dependent variable. Residual plots were used to validate all regression models.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Median fetal weights during gestation in the three birth weight tertiles are shown in Fig. 1A
. Fetal growth was linear in the period studied (approximate gestational wk 2840) and estimated to a mean of 174 g/wk (range, 150227 g/wk; Fig. 2A
).
|
|
Placental GH levels were detectable in all available samples from as early as 5 wk gestation and increased significantly throughout pregnancy to a peak of 22 ng/ml (range, 4.6469.22 ng/ml) at approximately 37 wk gestation (Fig. 2B
). Subsequently, placental GH levels decreased until the time of birth, with the lowest values seen in women giving birth to the lightest children (Fig. 1B
). In late second trimester and third trimester, placental GH levels showed large interindividual variation (Fig. 2B
). The total change in placental GH was significantly negatively associated with maternal BMI (P = 0.031) and positively with the change in maternal IGF-I (P = 0.037) when the model was adjusted for fetal sex (P = 0.128). The change in placental GH between wk 24.5 and 37.5 was significantly related to fetal sex (P = 0.048); women carrying female fetuses had a tendency toward steeper placental GH slopes (Table 3
).
|
Individual maternal IGF-I levels increased throughout pregnancy, reached a maximum of 436 ng/ml (range, 215705) at approximately 37 wk gestation, and decreased before parturition (Fig. 2D
). In late gestation IGF-I levels showed marked interindividual variation. The change in IGF-I was positively associated with the change in placental GH throughout gestation in a linear regression analysis (r2 = 0.1519; P < 0.001; Fig. 3
). In a multivariate analysis, the change in IGF-I was even more strongly associated with the change in placental GH (P < 0.001), the change in IGFBP-3 (P < 0.001), and maternal prepregnancy BMI (P = 0.003; Table 3
). IGFBP-3 levels increased significantly throughout gestation (P = 0.001; Fig. 2C
), and the peak of 5116 ng/ml (range, 30749924) was reached at approximately 37 wk gestation. The change in IGFBP-3 throughout gestation was positively associated with the change in IGF-I (P < 0.001; Table 3
).
|
Fetal growth rate was significantly positively associated with the change in placental GH (P = 0.027) between gestational wk 24.537.5 in a model adjusted for confounders (Table 4
). Using birth weight as the dependent variable, both the change in placental GH during 24.537.5 wk gestation (P = 0.027) and gestational age at birth (P = 0.021) were significantly positively associated with birth weight (Table 4
). Inclusion of placental weight in the model eliminated the significant associations of placental GH and gestational age with birth weight, as placental weight is strongly associated with birth weight. Placental weight was significantly positively associated with gestational age at birth (P = 0.049) and the change in IGF-I throughout gestation (P = 0.039), but not with the change in placental GH (Table 4
).
|
We found that the gestational age when maximum placental GH concentrations were reached was significantly positively associated with pregnancy length in days (P = 0.007). Neither the maximal concentration of placental GH, the difference between maximal levels and last taken blood sample, gestational age at maximal IGF-I levels, or maximum IGF-I level was significantly associated with pregnancy length.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study placental GH was positively associated with fetal growth during a period when fetal weight gain is large. The pregnancy-induced rise in placental GH explains less than 10% of the variation in fetal growth rate, which may reflect the limited number of subjects in our study. Nevertheless, our present findings, based on longitudinal assessments, are in accordance with data from a previous cross-sectional study of 455 pregnant women, in whom placental GH was positively associated with fetal weight at approximately 28 wk gestation (19). In addition, data from studies of pathological pregnancies suggested that placental GH levels were lower in women with IUGR compared with normal pregnancies (5, 9, 10). Placental GH mRNA expression per cell did not differ between normal and IUGR placentas (20), although controversy exists (21). Chowen et al. (20) found that the mean number of cells expressing placental GH mRNA per area was significantly greater in normal placentas. This suggests that decreased levels of placental GH in the maternal circulation in IUGR are not only due to a reduced placental size, but also to a reduced number of placental cells per area that are capable of producing this peptide.
Intriguingly, we found that the age at which placental GH peaks was positively associated with pregnancy length. Thus, the earlier the time of the placental GH peak during gestation, the earlier the child was born within 3742 wk gestation. A preliminary study reported on significantly reduced placental GH levels at the onset of labor compared with levels obtained 24 d before birth (22). However, it remains to be seen whether placental GH may be implicated in the mechanisms of the onset of labor.
Placental GH, a product of the GH-V gene, is predominantly expressed in syncytiotrophoblast cells, and transcript levels increase with increasing formation of syncytiotrophoblasts (23, 24). Receptors for GH are present in the villous trophoblasts as well as the extravillous trophoblasts (25) and bind placental GH with similar affinity compared with pituitary GH. In addition, activation of the GH receptor by placental GH leads to same intracellular signaling compared with 22-kDa, pituitary-derived GH (26). Therefore, it has been speculated that placental GH acts as an auto- or paracrine trophic hormone on placental growth or, alternatively, affects placental function. We did not find any association between placental size at birth and the change in placental GH levels, which could suggest that placental GH may not be the primary trophic regulator of placental growth. However, this does not exclude placenta as the target organ for placental GH. Placental GH may still regulate the transport of nutrients across the placenta to the fetus. Glucose transporters are localized in the placenta. The GLUT1 glucose transporter, present on both the microvillous and basal membranes of the syncytium, is the primary isoform involved in the transplacental movement of glucose. The GLUT3 protein is localized to the arterial component of the fetal vascular endothelium, where it may play a role in enhancing transplacental glucose transport (27). Transgenic mice overexpressing placental GH were severely insulin resistant, as manifested by fasting and postprandial hyperinsulinemia (28). Placental GH is therefore a likely candidate to mediate the insulin resistance of pregnancy. Whether placental GH stimulates placental expression of glucose transporters, thereby regulating fetal glucose uptake, remains speculative.
The correlations between the rise in placental GH and IGF-I levels validates previous observations based on small cross-sectional studies (5, 9, 10, 29). In our study this association was seen after adjusting for other factors, such as BMI and fetal sex, which have previously been shown to influence maternal placental GH levels (19, 30, 31). It has been shown that placental GH and maternal IGF-I levels increase in pregnancies of GH-deficient women (6, 32), supporting the hypothesis of placental GH, and not pituitary GH, being the main regulator of maternal IGF-I during pregnancy. We found that maternal IGF-I levels increased throughout gestation until 37 wk gestation, with a subsequent decrease until birth. In line with this finding, previous cross-sectional studies of normal and pathological pregnancies (diabetes or IUGR) (33, 34, 35, 36) reported elevated IGF-I levels in late gestation compared with early gestation.
We found that the rate of increase in maternal IGF-I was not associated with fetal growth rate or birth weight. The possible mechanisms by which maternal IGF-I levels could influence fetal growth are uncertain. Decreased placental transport of certain amino acids has been described in IUGR pregnancies (37), and some animal studies suggest that maternal IGF-I may play a role in placental transfer of such nutrients. IGF-I treatment of pregnant sheep leads to an increase in glucose concentrations and amino acid uptake to the fetus (38). IGF-I infusions in pregnant mice and rats stimulate fetal weight with increasing litter size. thereby removing maternal constraint (39). Maternal IGF-I has been associated with intrauterine growth and birth weight in several species (40, 41). In humans, conflicting results exist on the relationship between maternal IGF-I levels in pregnancy and birth weight (36, 42, 43, 44). In our study of normal pregnant women without signs of placental dysfunction, there was no correlation of IGF-I to either fetal growth rate or birth weight. This is comparable to the finding of Holmes et al. (35), who reported an association between maternal IGF-I and birth weight in women with placental dysfunction, but not in healthy pregnant women. We found a positive association between the change in IGF-I throughout gestation and placental size, thereby suggesting a role for IGF-I in the regulation of placental growth. The increase in placental size may be associated with an increased transport of nutrients to the fetus due to an increase in the surface area for exchange.
Thus, we found that placental GH, but not IGF-I, was associated with fetal growth (but that they were interrelated). We believe that this could hypothetically suggest that placental GH influences fetal growth, whereas IGF-I may stimulate fetal growth indirectly by affecting placental size or function. Alternatively, maternal IGF-I may not be important for fetal growth at all. However, we cannot exclude that the differences may reflect the limited number of women in our study.
We found an increase in IGFBP-3 levels determined by RIA during pregnancy in accordance with the finding of Wang et al. (45). In our study the increase in IGFBP-3 was significantly positively associated with the changes in IGF-I levels, but was not associated with the changes in placental GH. To our knowledge, no previous data exist on the relationship between IGFBP-3 and placental GH. However, we have not investigated IGFBP-3 protease activity, which is known to occur in human third trimester pregnancies (46). Therefore, we cannot take into account relative changes in affinity or binding kinetics of IGFBP-3 that occur during pregnancy due to proteolytic modification.
In conclusion, placental GH was positively associated with fetal growth rate between 24.537.5 wk gestation as well as with birth weight, whereas this association was not found for IGF-I. We found that the gestational age at which peak values of placental GH were reached was associated with the length of pregnancy. In addition, this paper presents longitudinal reference ranges for maternal serum levels of placental GH, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 throughout normal pregnancies.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; IGFBP, IGF-binding protein; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction.
Received March 25, 2003.
Accepted September 29, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. J Vatten, T. I L Nilsen, A. Juul, S. Jeansson, P. A Jenum, and A. Eskild Changes in circulating level of IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-1 from the first to second trimester as predictors of preeclampsia Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 158(1): 101 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Jensen, S. Vielwerth, T. Larsen, G. Greisen, H. Leffers, and A. Juul The Presence of the d3-Growth Hormone Receptor Polymorphism Is Negatively Associated with Fetal Growth but Positively Associated with Postnatal Growth in Healthy Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2758 - 2763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Saenger, P. Czernichow, I. Hughes, and E. O. Reiter Small for Gestational Age: Short Stature and Beyond Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2007; 28(2): 219 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. E. Walenkamp, H. J. van der Kamp, A. M. Pereira, S. G. Kant, H. A. van Duyvenvoorde, M. F. Kruithof, M. H. Breuning, J. A. Romijn, M. Karperien, and J. M. Wit A Variable Degree of Intrauterine and Postnatal Growth Retardation in a Family with a Missense Mutation in the Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Receptor J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2006; 91(8): 3062 - 3070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S Schernhammer, J. M Holly, D. J Hunter, M. N Pollak, and S. E Hankinson Insulin-like growth factor-I, its binding proteins (IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3), and growth hormone and breast cancer risk in The Nurses Health Study II. Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 583 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E Trujillo-Ortega, D. Mota-Rojas, R. Hernandez-Gonzalez, E. Y. Velazquez-Armenta, A. A Nava-Ocampo, R. Ramirez-Necoechea, M. Becerril-Herrera, and M. Alonso-Spilsbury Obstetric and neonatal outcomes to recombinant porcine somatotropin administered in the last third of pregnancy to primiparous sows. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 189(3): 575 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fuglsang, P. Sandager, N. Moller, S. Fisker, H. Orskov, and P. Ovesen Kinetics and secretion of placental growth hormone around parturition. Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 154(3): 449 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |