help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flor-Cisneros, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flor-Cisneros, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 1 236-241
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

In Boys with Abnormal Developmental Tempo, Maturation of the Skeleton and the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis Remains Synchronous

Armando Flor-Cisneros, Ellen W. Leschek, Deborah P. Merke, Kevin M. Barnes, Marilena Coco, Gordon B. Cutler, Jr. and Jeffrey Baron

Developmental Endocrinology Branch (A.F.-C., E.W.L., K.M.B., M.C., J.B.) and Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center and the Pediatric Reproductive Endocrinology Branch (D.P.M.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and Eli Lilly and Company (G.B.C.), Indianapolis, Indiana 46285

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Armando Flor-Cisneros, M.D., Building 10 RM 10N262, 10 Center Drive MSC 1862, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1862. E-mail: flora{at}mail.nih.gov.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The primary mechanism that initiates puberty is unknown. One possible clue is that pubertal maturation often parallels skeletal maturation. Conditions that delay skeletal maturation also tend to delay the onset of puberty, whereas conditions that accelerate skeletal maturation tend to hasten the onset of puberty. To examine this relationship, we studied boys with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (n = 13) and familial male-limited precocious puberty (n = 22), two conditions that accelerate maturational tempo, and boys with idiopathic short stature (n = 18) in which maturational tempo is sometimes delayed.

In all three conditions, the onset of central puberty generally occurred at an abnormal chronological age but a normal bone age. Boys with the greatest skeletal advancement began central puberty at the earliest age, whereas boys with the greatest skeletal delay began puberty at the latest age. Furthermore, the magnitude of the skeletal advancement or delay matched the magnitude of the pubertal advancement or delay. This synchrony between skeletal maturation and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis maturation was observed among patients within each condition and also between conditions. In contrast, the maturation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis did not remain synchronous with other maturational processes including weight, height, or body mass index.

We conclude that in boys with abnormal developmental tempo, maturation of the skeleton and the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis remains synchronous. This synchrony is consistent with the hypothesis that in boys, skeletal maturation influences hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis maturation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE TRANSFORMATION OF a child into an adult involves not only an increase in size but also a qualitative maturation in form and function of many organ systems. The skeleton, for example, forms initially out of cartilage and is subsequently converted into bone tissue (1). This process concludes with epiphyseal fusion. Skeletal maturation can be assessed radiologically and quantified as a bone age. A second important maturational process involves the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. During childhood, GnRH secretion is suppressed, but during the adolescent years, this suppression is released, initiating puberty. The mechanisms immediately responsible for this suppression and subsequent activation involve neuronal input to the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator (2, 3). However, the primary timing mechanism that initiates the activation and thus triggers puberty is unknown (4).

In some circumstances, there appears to be a temporal correlation between skeletal maturation and HPG axis maturation. Conditions that delay maturation of the skeleton also tend to delay maturation of the HPG axis. Such conditions include chronic disease, malnutrition, hypothyroidism, constitutional delay, and GH deficiency (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Conversely, conditions that accelerate skeletal maturation, such as peripheral precocious puberty, obesity, and Marfan syndrome, also accelerate maturation of the HPG axis, causing central precocious puberty (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). A general concordance between the rates of different maturational processes was observed by Tanner (16), who used the term tempo to refer to the overall pace of somatic maturation.

The mechanism responsible for this temporal correlation between skeletal maturation and HPG axis maturation is unknown (2), in part because the correlation has not been carefully characterized. Although informal observations suggest that the two systems tend to be regulated in the same direction, there have been few systematic studies to determine whether the two systems remain truly synchronous in disorders that affect maturational tempo. Lack of synchrony would argue against a direct causal link between the two systems.

To explore these issues, we asked whether maturation of the skeleton and the HPG axis remain synchronous in boys with conditions that affect the tempo of maturation. We therefore studied boys with congenital adrenal hyperplasia and familial male-limited precocious puberty, two conditions that accelerate maturational tempo, and boys with idiopathic short stature in which maturational tempo is sometimes delayed.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

All subjects were participating in one of three ongoing treatment trials, which were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Informed consent was obtained from a parent of each patient, and assent was obtained from the older children. Subjects were included in the current retrospective analysis if onset of central puberty occurred during the course of the clinical trial. This determination was based on testicular volume and GnRH stimulation testing as defined below.

The 22 subjects with familial male-limited precocious puberty (FMPP) were receiving spironolactone 5.7 mg/kg·d and testolactone 40 mg/kg·d (12). Inclusion criteria for the trial included 1) diagnosis of FMPP, 2) age less than 10 yr, and 3) unfused epiphyses. All boys included in the current analysis had a known mutation in the LH receptor.

The 13 subjects with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) had been randomly assigned to one of two treatment regimens (17). Nine patients were receiving hydrocortisone (~12 mg/m2·d) and fludrocortisone (~175 µg/d), and four patients were receiving hydrocortisone (~8 mg/m2·d), fludrocortisone (~230 µg/d), testolactone (40 mg/kg·d), and flutamide (10 mg/kg·d). The inclusion criteria for the trial included 1) diagnosis of classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency and 2) bone age 2–13 yr.

The 18 subjects with idiopathic short stature (ISS) were receiving either GH, 0.074 mg/kg three times per week, or placebo (18). The inclusion criteria for the treatment protocol included 1) chronological age 10–16 yr, 2) bone age 13 yr or less, 3) testicular volume 10 ml or less, 4) proportionate short stature with absolute and/or predicted height -2.5 SD or less, and 5) peak stimulated GH 7 µg/liter or less. Target height, bone age delay, and growth velocity were not part of the inclusion criteria.

Normative data were obtained from the 2000 National Center for Health Statistics study (19). Height age of a subject was defined as the age at which the median height of normal boys was equal to the subject’s height. Weight age and body mass index (BMI) age were defined analogously. Bone age advancement was defined as bone age minus chronological age. Height age advancement, weight age advancement, and BMI age advancement were defined analogously. Pubertal advancement was defined as the normal age of pubertal onset for boys, 12 yr (20) minus chronological age at onset of puberty.

Clinical evaluation

The subjects were evaluated every 6 months, including the following measurements: testicular volume using a Prader orchidometer (21), GnRH test (CAH and FMPP patients only), bone age, morning height (average of at least three measurements) using a Harpenden stadiometer, and weight. LH and FSH were measured by RIA (Covance, Vienna, VA). Bone age was evaluated by observers unaware of the study hypothesis using the method of Greulich and Pyle (22).

In subjects with CAH, the onset of central puberty was defined by either a testicular volume at least 4 ml (in the absence of significant testicular adrenal rest tissue by ultrasound) or a GnRH-stimulation test (peak LH >= 30 mIU/ml or peak LH/ peak FSH ratio >= 3.66) (23). In subjects with FMPP (which affects testicular volume directly), onset of central puberty was defined by GnRH testing. In subjects with ISS, GnRH testing was not performed and the onset of central puberty was defined by a testicular volume at least 4 ml.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In subjects with CAH and FMPP, the onset of central puberty occurred at an early chronological age but a normal bone age (Fig. 1Go). Conversely, in subjects with ISS, the onset of central puberty occurred at a late chronological age but a normal bone age (Fig. 1Go). Thus, the mean bone age at onset of puberty was similar in FMPP (12.0 yr), CAH (12.8 yr), and ISS (11.9 yr) (Table 1Go). This synchrony at onset of puberty was not observed for other markers of growth and maturation, including chronological age, height, weight, and BMI. Thus, for example, boys with CAH entered puberty with significantly greater BMI than boys with FMPP or ISS (Table 1Go).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Comparison of bone age (BA) and chronological age (CA) at onset of central puberty in boys with FMPP (•), CAH ({blacksquare}), and ISS ({blacktriangleup}).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of boys with FMPP, CAH, and ISS at the onset of central puberty (mean ± SD)

 
We next asked whether skeletal maturation and HPG axis maturation remained synchronous among individuals within each diagnostic category. For each boy we compared the severity of skeletal advancement (assessed as the bone age minus the chronological age at onset of puberty) with the severity of pubertal advancement [assessed as the normal age at pubertal onset (12 yr) (20, 24) minus the chronological age at onset of puberty].

Among individuals within each of the three diagnostic categories, there was a positive correlation between the severity of skeletal advancement and the severity of pubertal advancement (Fig. 2Go). Thus, in CAH and FMPP, subjects with the greatest skeletal advancement tended to have the greatest pubertal advancement (FMPP: r = 0.46, P = 0.03; CAH: r = 0.93, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2Go, A and B). Conversely, in ISS, subjects with the greatest skeletal delay tended to have the greatest pubertal delay (r = 0.88, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2CGo).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Correlation between bone age (BA) advancement (BA-chronological age) and pubertal advancement (12 - chronological age) in each diagnostic category: A, FMPP; B, CAH; C, ISS; D, combined.

 
When this relationship was examined in the combined population, the correlation was particularly strong (r = 0.93, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2DGo). Furthermore, the line of best fit for the combined data closely approximated the line of identity (y = x), indicating that the magnitude of skeletal advancement closely approximated the magnitude of pubertal advancement. Thus, for example, boys with 5 yr of skeletal advancement typically entered puberty 5 yr earlier than normal, at age 7 yr, whereas boys with 2 yr of skeletal delay typically entered puberty 2 yr later than normal, at age 14 yr.

In contrast, the severity of pubertal advancement or delay did not correlate well with any other maturational markers that we examined (Table 2Go). The severity of pubertal advance did correlate significantly with the height age advancement for boys with CAH and ISS. However, the height age advancement explained less of the variance in pubertal advancement (CAH: r = 0.59; ISS: r = 0.68) than did bone age advancement (CAH: r = 0.93; ISS: r = 0.88). Furthermore, among boys with FMPP, there was not a significant correlation between height age and pubertal advancement.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Correlation between pubertal advancement (12 - CA) and other maturational markers at onset of central puberty

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In boys with abnormal developmental tempo, the onset of central puberty generally occurred at an abnormal chronological age but a normal bone age. Thus, boys with the most severe skeletal advancement began central puberty at the earliest age, whereas boys with the greatest skeletal delay began central puberty at the latest age. Furthermore, the magnitude of the skeletal advancement or delay matched the magnitude of the pubertal advancement or delay. This synchronous relationship between skeletal maturation and HPG axis maturation was observed among patients within each diagnostic category and also between diagnostic categories. In contrast, the maturation of the HPG axis did not remain synchronous with other maturational processes, including weight, height, or BMI.

The criteria to determine the onset of central puberty differed among the three diagnostic groups. In boys with CAH, onset of central puberty was defined by either a testicular volume at least 4 ml or by a pubertal response to GnRH analog. In these patients, ultrasound was performed to exclude testicular enlargement due to adrenal rest tissue. Because FMPP causes mild testicular enlargement even in the absence of central puberty (18), the GnRH stimulation test alone was used to determine the onset of central puberty. In ISS, central puberty was defined by testicular volume at least 4 ml, because serial GnRH testing had not been performed. We cannot directly verify whether the testicular volume and GnRH test criteria are equivalent in these patient populations. However, the GnRH test regimen, gonadotropin assays, and LH and FSH concentration criteria were selected because they correlate well with secondary sexual characteristics in normal boys (23).

Height age, weight age, and BMI age, which compare the child with normative data, may not be ideal markers of somatic maturation. For example, a child with familial short stature would have a delayed height age even though his overall maturation may not be delayed. In this case, the percent of his adult height achieved (i.e. his height divided by his eventual adult height) might be a better marker of maturation. However, adult heights were not available for many patients.

We were unable to assess the correlation between skeletal maturation and HPG axis maturation in girls with abnormal developmental tempo. In girls with CAH and with McCune Albright syndrome, we could not identify a reliable criterion for onset of central puberty based on the GnRH-stimulated peak LH levels and/or peak LH/FSH ratio (data not shown). These values varied erratically with age, sometimes alternating from pubertal to prepubertal levels within a single female subject, unlike the gradual increase in gonadotropins seen in boys. Therefore, we do not know whether skeletal maturation and HPG axis maturation remain synchronous in girls.

Our data suggest that in boys, the relationship between HPG axis maturation and bone maturation may be bidirectional. There is already a well established causal connection between these two processes; maturation of the HPG axis increases estrogen concentrations, which in turn accelerate skeletal maturation (Fig. 3Go, causal relationship 1). This known causal connection could explain a correlation between bone age and achievement of mid-late pubertal stages because progression through puberty causes increasing exposure to sex steroids, maturing the skeleton. However, this causal direction is less likely to explain a correlation between bone age and achievement of pubertal onset. At pubertal onset, sex steroid levels are just beginning to rise (25). The concentrations are probably not high enough and the time of exposure is probably insufficient to significantly advance bone age. Particularly in the boys with CAH and FMPP, the small increase in sex steroids that occurs at the very beginning of central puberty would be minor compared with the sex steroids already present due to the underlying disease. Furthermore, in the boys in FMPP and some of those with CAH, the treatment with an antiandrogen and an aromatase inhibitor would be expected to block much of the effect of sex steroids on the skeleton. Therefore, the association between bone age and pubertal onset observed in the current study suggests that the reverse causal relationship may exist as well; skeletal maturation may influence maturation of the HPG axis (Fig. 3Go, causal relationship 2).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Diagram of possible causal relationships between skeletal maturation and HPG axis maturation.

 
However, the synchrony between skeletal and pubertal onset does not necessarily imply that skeletal maturation affects pubertal maturation. This association could also arise if factors that influence the maturational rate of one system also independently influence the maturational rate of the other (Fig. 3Go, causal relationship 3). On the other hand, one would not necessarily expect this independent, parallel regulation to produce the precise synchrony observed in this study.

Previous studies have suggested a temporal correlation between skeletal maturation and pubertal onset, both in conditions that slow maturational tempo, including chronic disease, malnutrition, hypothyroidism, constitutional delay, and GH deficiency (5, 7, 8, 9, 10), and also in conditions that accelerate maturational tempo, including peripheral precocious puberty (11, 12, 13) and obesity (14). Most of these previous studies suggest that skeletal and HPG axis maturation tend to be regulated in the same direction but did not determine whether or not the two systems remain truly synchronous. However, for GH deficiency, this relationship has been well studied, and synchrony does appear to be maintained (10). In contrast, in normal children, the onset of puberty reportedly does not show a stronger association with bone age than with chronological age (26). This reported lack of association between skeletal advancement and pubertal advancement in normal children, if correct, argues against a direct causal link between the two systems (26). However, in the study supporting that conclusion, the onset of puberty was determined using photographs rather than by direct inspection, palpation of breast tissue, measurement of testicular volume, or biochemical testing, and the mathematical analysis assessing the association was limited.

The observed synchrony between skeletal and HPG axis maturation may provide an important clue to the mechanisms that regulate the onset of puberty. During childhood, the reproductive axis is quiescent because the hypothalamic GnRH pulse generator is suppressed by neuronal input. During adolescence, this suppression is released, initiating puberty. The regulation of GnRH secretion may involve inhibitory neurotransmitters, including {gamma}-aminobutyric-acid (GABA), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and opioids, and stimulatory neurotransmitters, including glutamate and norepinephrine (2, 3, 27). In addition, glial-neuronal interactions involving TGF-{alpha}, neuroregulins, and prostaglandin E2 may regulate GnRH secretion (28, 29).

The primary timing mechanism that initiates the activation of GnRH secretion and thus triggers puberty is unknown (4). Two alternative general hypotheses have been proposed. First, the timing mechanism might reside within the central nervous system, perhaps involving the neurotransmitters and glial-neuronal interactions mentioned above. A second possibility is that the pubertal clock might reside outside the nervous system.

Somatic maturation could cause a change (either an increase or a decrease) in the concentration of a circulating factor that regulates neuronal/glial input to the hypothalamic pulse generator. Thus, puberty could be initiated when the concentration of this factor reaches a threshold. For example, it has been hypothesized that the accumulation of adipose tissue causes an increase in leptin concentration, which then initiates puberty (30). However, studies in rodents (31), rhesus monkeys (32), and humans (33) suggest that although inadequate leptin does inhibit the reproductive axis, leptin does not appear to be involved in the clock that controls the onset of puberty. In our study, pubertal onset did not correlate closely with BMI.

The observed synchrony in boys between skeletal maturation and pubertal maturation raises the possibility that skeletal maturation might provide the biological clock timing the onset of puberty. Plant et al. (3, 34) have speculated that a substance secreted by the immature skeleton might be responsible for imposing the prepubertal hiatus in pulsatile GnRH release. With increasing age, skeletal maturation might cause a decrease in the production of this factor, thereby releasing the inhibition of the HPG axis. For example, if the factor were produced by growth cartilage, the gradual replacement of this cartilage by bone tissue might cause a decline in circulating levels of the factor. This possible interaction between the skeleton and the HPG axis might provide a mechanism that delays reproduction until somatic growth is complete. A link between these systems might have been particularly advantageous when nutritional intake was uncertain, causing variability in the chronological age at which adult stature was achieved.

Our findings also provide a useful clinical rule. In boys with peripheral precocious puberty, evaluation and treatment for secondary central puberty should be considered when the bone age approaches the normal age of pubertal onset. Secondary central puberty can exacerbate the abnormalities of growth, skeletal maturation, behavior, and secondary sexual characteristics, and thus evaluation and treatment of this supervening event may be clinically important (35).

We conclude that in conditions that alter developmental tempo in boys, the maturation of the skeleton and the HPG axis remains synchronous. This synchrony is maintained in boys with CAH and FMPP, conditions that accelerate maturational tempo, and in boys with ISS, in which maturational tempo may be delayed. This maintenance of synchrony is consistent with the hypothesis that skeletal maturation might regulate HPG axis maturation.


    Footnotes
 
D.P.M. and J.B. are commissioned officers in the United States Public Health Service.

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CAH, congenital adrenal hyperplasia; FMPP, familial male-limited precocious puberty; HPG, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal; ISS, idiopathic short stature.

Received December 12, 2002.

Accepted October 15, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. De Luca F, Baron J 1999 Skeletal maturation. Endocrinologist 9:286–293
  2. Teresawa E, Fernandez DL 2001 Neurobiological mechanisms of the onset of puberty in primates. Endocr Rev 22:111–151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Plant TM 2001 Neurobiological bases underlying the control of the onset of puberty in the rhesus monkey: a representative higher primate. Front Neuroendocrinol 22:107–139[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Grumbach MM 2002 The neuroendocrinology of human puberty revisited. Horm Res 57(Suppl 2):2–14
  5. Sedlmeyer IL, Palmert MR 2002 Delayed puberty: analysis of a large case series from an academic center. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1613–1620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kulin HE, Bwibo N, Mutie D, Santner SJ 1982 The effect of chronic childhood malnutrition on pubertal growth and development. Am J Clin Nutr 36:527–536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Alvear J, Artaza C, Vial M, Guerrero S, Muzzo S 1986 Physical growth and bone age of survivors of protein energy malnutrition. Arch Dis Child 61:257–262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mantzoros CS, Flier JS. Pantsiouou S, Stanhope R, Uruena M, Preece MA, Grant DB 1991 Growth prognosis and growth after menarche in primary hypothyroidism. Arch Dis Child 66:838–840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Prader A 1975 Delayed adolescence. Clin Endocrinol Metab 4:143–155[Medline]
  10. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH 1975 A note on the bone age at which patients with true isolated growth hormone deficiency enter puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 41:788–790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pescovitz OH, Comite F, Cassorla F, Dwyer AJ, Poth MA, Sperling MA, Hench K, McNemar A, Skerda M, Loriaux DL 1984 True precocious puberty complicating congenital adrenal hyperplasia: treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 58:857–861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Leschek EW, Jones J, Barnes KM, Hill SC, Cutler Jr GB 1999 Six-year results of spironolactone and testolactone treatment of familial male-limited precocious puberty with addition of deslorelin after central puberty onset. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:175–178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Holland FJ, Kirsch SE, Selby R 1987 Gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty ("testotoxicosis"): influence of maturational status on response to ketoconazole. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 64:328–333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Vignolo M, Naselli A, Di Battista E, Mostert M, Aicardi G 1988 Growth and development in simple obesity. Eur J Pediatr 147:242–244[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Erkula G, Jones KB, Sponseller PD, Dietz HC, Pyeritz RE 2002 Growth and maturation in Marfan syndrome. Am J Med Genet 109:100–115[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Tanner JM 1987 Issues and advances in adolescent growth and development. J Adolesc Health Care 8:470–478[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Merke DP, Keil MF, Jones JV, Fields J, Hill S, Cutler Jr GB 2000 Flutamide, testolactone, and reduced hydrocortisone dose maintain normal growth velocity and bone maturation despite elevated androgen levels in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1114–1120
  18. Leschek EW, Troendle JF, Yanovski JA, Rose SR, Bernstein DB, Cutler Jr GB, Baron J 2001 Effect of growth hormone treatment on testicular function, puberty, and adrenarche in boys with non-growth hormone-deficient short stature: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr 138:406–410[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL 2002 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 246:1–190
  20. Wheeler MD 1991 Physical changes in puberty. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 20:1–14
  21. Zachmann M, Prader A, Kind HP, Hafliger H, Budliger H 1974 Testicular volume during adolescence: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Helv Paediatr Acta 29:61–72[Medline]
  22. Greulich WW, Pyle SI 1959 Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
  23. Oerter KE, Uriarte MM, Rose SR, Barnes KM, Cutler Jr GB 1990 Gonadotropin secretory dynamics during puberty in normal girls and boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:1251–1258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Marshall WA, Tanner JM 1970 Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Child 45:13–23
  25. Zhang J, Peddada SD, Malina RM, Rogol AD 2000 Longitudinal assessment of hormonal and physical alterations during normal puberty in boys. VI. Modeling of growth velocity, mean growth hormone (GH mean), and serum testosterone (T) concentrations. Am J Hum Biol 12:814–824
  26. Marshall WA 1974 Interrelationships of skeletal maturation, sexual development and somatic growth in man. Ann Hum Biol 1:29–40
  27. El Majdoubi M, Sahu A, Ramaswamy S, Plant TM 2000 Neuropeptide Y: a hypothalamic brake restraining the onset of puberty in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6179–6184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ojeda SR, Ma YJ 1999 Glial-neuronal interactions in the neuroendocrine control of mammalian puberty: facilitatory effects of gonadal steroids. J Neurobiol 40:528–540[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Ma YJ, Hill DF, Creswick KE, Costa ME, Cornea A, Lioubin MN, Plowman GD, Ojeda SR 1999 Neuregulins signaling via a glial erbB-2-erbB-4 receptor complex contribute to the neuroendocrine control of mammalian sexual development. J Neurosci 19:9913–9927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Mantzoros CS, Flier JS, Rogol AD 1997 A longitudinal assessment of hormonal and physical alteration during normal puberty in boys. V. Rising leptin levels may signal the onset of puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1066–1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bronson FH 2001 Puberty in female mice is not associated with increases in either body fat or leptin. Endocrinology 142:4758–4761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Plant TM, Durrant AR 1997 Circulating leptin does not appear to provide a signal for triggering the initiation of puberty in the male rhesus monkey. Endocrinology 138:4505–4508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Ahmed ML, Ong KK, Morrell Dj, Cox L, Drayer N, Perry L, Preece MA, Dunger DB 1999 Longitudinal study of leptin concentrations during puberty: sex differences and relationship to changes in body composition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:899–905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Plant TM, Fraser MO, Medhamurthy R, Gay VL 1989 Somatogenic control of GnRH neuronal synchronization during development in primates: a speculation. In: Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Plant TM, van Rees GP, Shoemaker J, eds. Control of onset of puberty III. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 111–121
  35. Weissenberger AA, Leschek EW, Zametkin AJ 2001 Case study: sexual hyperactivity treated with psychostimulants in familial male precocious puberty. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40:373–376[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. F. Fleisch, N. Agarwal, M. D. Roberts, J. C. Han, K. R. Theim, A. Vexler, J. Troendle, S. Z. Yanovski, and J. A. Yanovski
Influence of Serum Leptin on Weight and Body Fat Growth in Children at High Risk for Adult Obesity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 948 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flor-Cisneros, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flor-Cisneros, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baron, J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals