help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Högler, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Högler, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 89, No. 1 193-199
Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society

Importance of Estrogen on Bone Health in Turner Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

Wolfgang Högler, Julie Briody, Bin Moore, Sarah Garnett, Pei Wen Lu and Christopher T. Cowell

Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes (W.H., B.M., S.G., P.W.L., C.T.C.) and Department of Nuclear Medicine (J.B.), The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, NSW 2145 Sydney, Australia; and Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (W.H.), University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Wolfgang Högler, M.D., Institute of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead NSW 2145, Sydney, Australia. E-mail: wolfgang.hoegler{at}uibk.ac.at.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Osteoporosis and fractures are features in adults with Turner syndrome (TS). Using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, correcting bone mineral content (BMC) for height and lean mass (LTM) avoids misclassification of short children as osteopenic. Total body (TB), lumbar spine (LS), and femoral neck (FN) dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans were performed on 83 patients with TS (aged 4–24 yr). A prepubertal subgroup (n = 17) receiving GH was followed for 24 months.

Age z-scores for height, TB BMC, LTM, the BMC/LTM ratio, and LS volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) decreased significantly (P < 0.001) with age in prepubertal subjects (n = 51) but were constant in the combined pubertal and postmenarchal group (n = 32). Osteopenia was found in 14.5% (TB), 15.8% (LS), and 28.4% (FN) of patients. In the longitudinal subgroup, TB BMC z-scores decreased by -0.28 (0.31) in subjects remaining prepubertal (n = 11) but increased by 0.71 (0.56) in subjects entering puberty (n = 6; P = 0.007). The z-scores for height and LTM increased in both groups.

Our results show a height-independent prepubertal decrease in bone mass accrual, which ceased with puberty. Optimizing bone mass in TS may require earlier induction of puberty than currently recommended. However, reduced FN volumetric bone mineral density and a dissociation of bone and muscle measures were age independent, suggesting an additional intrinsic bone defect.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
OSTEOPOROSIS (1, 2), REDUCED volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) (3), and an increased risk of fracture (2, 4, 5, 6) have been reported as features of Turner syndrome (TS) not only in adults but also in children (7, 8, 9). Osteoporosis may result from an inherent bone structure defect associated with other skeletal and connective tissue anomalies of the syndrome or, more likely, from estrogen deficiency. Estrogen replacement (2, 10, 11) and treatment of short stature with GH were reported to optimize bone mass in TS girls (12, 13, 14, 15).

The two-dimensional assessment of areal BMD (grams per centimeter squared) using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can cause misclassification of individuals with short stature, as in TS, as osteopenic (16). In awareness of this technical limitation, most studies of children, adolescents, and young adults with TS did not detect significant osteopenia when (areal) total body (TB) BMD results were corrected for body size (8, 14, 17). Regional scans in young women with TS have shown normal vBMD (grams per centimeter cubed) at the phalanges using radiographic absorptiometry (12) and at the lumbar spine (LS) using DXA (18) and normal trabecular vBMD at the radius using peripheral quantitative computer tomography (pQCT) (19). In prepubertal girls with TS, however, trabecular LS vBMD was reduced using QCT (20).

Muscle mass and strength are significant contributors to bone strength and health (21, 22). Using pQCT, cortical size and bone mineral content (BMC) were reduced in relation to muscle size at the radius in 21 patients with TS (19). No study has investigated the muscle-bone relation in TS in a large sample, or longitudinally, so far.

The main purposes of the present study were 1) to identify the effect of puberty on bone and muscle mass in a cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort, 2) to examine TB and regional bone scans for the presence of osteopenia in children and adolescents with TS by applying size corrections to the areal DXA output, and 3) to examine the muscle-bone relation at the TB level.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

The study population comprised 83 subjects with TS aged 4–24 yr with a mean (SD) age of 12.76 (4.4) yr. At the time of bone densitometry, subjects were prepubertal (n = 51), pubertal [pubertal stage 2 to menarche (n = 16)], or postmenarchal (n = 16). Ten patients of the pubertal group and three of the postmenarchal group had entered puberty spontaneously. In the postmenarchal subjects, bone densitometry was performed a mean (SD) 2.78 (3.18) yr after menarche, which had occurred at age 16.34 (2.24).

The common treatment regimen for pubertal induction in our hospital is either with ß-estradiol or conjugated estrogens, based on standard recommendations (23). This regimen is usually started at 14 yr of age but necessarily has to be individualized. At the time of measurement, 42 patients were on GH treatment with a standard dose of 9 mg/m2·wk to improve short stature. Seven of the 16 postmenarchal patients had never received GH. Eleven patients were additionally on treatment with Oxandrolone.

Karyotype was either 45 XO (n = 33) or showed a structurally abnormal X chromosome or various forms of mosaicism (n = 50), all with clear Turner phenotype. The chromosomal mosaic of five patients included 45XO/46XY cell lines without clinical signs of sexual ambiguity or virilization. All subjects were patients at The Children’s Hospital at Westmead.

A subgroup of 17 prepubertal patients starting GH treatment, aged 9.55 (3.12) yr, was studied longitudinally over a period of 2 yr. Their height z-score (SD score) was -2.74 (0.95), the weight z-score was -0.77 (1.18), and their bone age was 9.37 (2.2) yr. Bone densitometry, anthropometry, bone age, and pubertal stages were assessed before the commencement of GH (baseline) and after 6, 12, and 24 months of GH treatment at a dose of 7.83 (1.83) mg/m2·wk. This lower dose, in comparison with the higher doses currently recommended, was used as this longitudinal study was performed in the early 1990s, when no official guidelines were available. The patients were seen at 3-monthly intervals for clinical assessment. Adjustment of GH dose occurred every 6 months. Interestingly, five patients developed spontaneous puberty during the 2-yr study period, resulting in spontaneous menarche in all of them after the study ended. Puberty was induced in another 13-yr-old patient. One patient dropped out of the study after 18 months. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved both studies, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects and families.

Methods

Height was measured with a Harpenden stadiometer to the nearest 1 mm and weight with an electronic scale to the nearest 20 g on the day of the DXA scan. Height and weight z-scores (SD scores) were calculated according to sex and age (24). For subjects over 18 yr, height and weight z-scores were calculated as for an 18-yr-old. Sex-specific body mass index (BMI in kilograms per meter squared) z-scores for age were calculated from data derived from Cronk and Roche (25). Classification of subjects into normal weight, overweight, and obesity based on BMI was derived from Cole et al. (26). Pubertal stages were assessed according to Tanner (27).

A pencil beam DPX (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) TB scanner with adult software (version 3.4) was used to perform DXA measurements on all subjects. Analysis was done with software version 4.7 by a single technician. The technique and measurement protocol, including quality-assurance testing, has been described previously (28, 29). In brief, the coefficients of variation for TB BMC, lean mass (LTM), and percent fat mass were 0.74, 0.82, and 1.59%, respectively. TB measurements were compared with our normative dataset of 249 healthy females aged 3–30 yr and analyzed according to a four-step procedure recently published (30). This procedure first involves comparison of z-scores for BMC and height to account for the strong body-size relation of DXA output and then examines the muscle-bone relation using z-scores for LTM and the BMC/LTM ratio. We slightly modified the procedure in this study by exclusively reporting age z-scores for DXA measures. Using height z-scores in subjects with short stature, particularly after puberty, can lead to undesired comparisons with much younger, prepubertal control subjects.

vBMD was derived from LS (L1-L4) and femoral neck (FN) scans performed on the same DPX. For comparison reasons, we used our normative database on females (3–30 yr) for the LS (n = 180) and the FN scans (n = 210), which is an expanded and updated version of the dataset previously published (29). Results for DXA variables are reported as age z-scores and as raw data.

Statistics

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Subject groups, corresponding to prepuberty, puberty, and post menarche were derived from the cross-sectional data set. Differences between the three groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the age relationship of z-scores for the prepubertal group and the combined pubertal and postmenarchal group. We used t tests to assess differences between groups according to GH therapy and oxandrolone status, spontaneous vs. induced puberty, and between karyotypes 45XO and mosaicism. In the longitudinal subgroup, the change in anthropometric and densitometric variables over the 24-month study period was calculated. The difference in this change between subjects entering puberty and subjects remaining prepubertal was assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. Data are presented as means (SD), and P < 0.05 were considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cross-sectional study

Population characteristics. Table 1Go shows the characteristics of the study population. There were no significant differences in z-scores for weight (P = 0.46), height (P = 0.17), or BMI (P = 0.16) between the prepuberal, pubertal, and postmenarchal groups. Percent fat increased significantly throughout the pubertal groups (P < 0.001). The percentage of subjects classified as overweight or obese was 27.5% in prepuberty, 37.5% in puberty, and 56% in the postmenarchal group (P = 0.11, Pearson {chi}2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the cross-sectional study population

 
Total body. Table 2Go shows the TB DXA results of prepubertal, pubertal, and postmenarchal subjects. BMC z-scores did not differ between pubertal groups, but LTM z-scores significantly decreased from the prepubertal to the pubertal period (P = 0.018). In prepubertal subjects, z-scores for BMC (r = -0.61), height (r = -0.44), LTM (r = -0.66), and the BMC/LTM ratio (r = -0.49) were inversely related to age (P < 0.001). After the onset of puberty, no significant relation with age was observed for any of these z-scores (Fig. 1Go, A–D). There was a strong relation between the z-scores for TB BMC and height (r = 0.66; P < 0.001), reflecting the dependence of DXA variables on body size. To adjust for body size, TB BMC z-scores predicted for height z-score were calculated based on our normative dataset. During the extended prepubertal period, BMC z-scores decreased compared with the predicted value for height z-score (r = -0.67; P < 0.001) but did not significantly change in the combined pubertal and postpubertal group (Fig. 2Go, regression line not shown). Osteopenia, defined as an observed TB BMC z-score >1.5 SD lower than predicted for height z-score was observed in 12 of 83 subjects (14.5%). These 12 subjects had a mean age of 14.60 (1.44) yr, and eight were prepubertal. Five subjects (6%) had values <–2 SD.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Mean (SD) TB and regional DXA results and differences between pubertal groups (ANOVA)

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Age z-scores for TB BMC, height, LTM, and the BMC/LTM ratio of 83 patients with TS. In prepubertal subjects (open circles), all z-scores decreased significantly with age (P < 0.001), but there was no significant change in any of the z-scores in the combined pubertal and postmenarchal groups (filled circles).

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The difference between observed and predicted TB BMC z-score plotted against age. The prediction of TB BMC z-score by height z-score corrects for the strong body-size relation of DXA results observed in our normative data (predicted BMC z-score = -0.031961 + 0.738298*height z-score; r = 0.68; P < 0.001). TB osteopenia is defined as observed BMC z-score >1.5 SD less than predicted (dashed line).

 
Examination of the muscle-bone relation revealed that BMC z-scores were significantly lower (t test) than LTM z-scores in the prepubertal (P < 0.001) and the combined pubertal group (P = 0.018). As a result, the z-score for the BMC/LTM ratio was low in many subjects (Fig. 1DGo). The prepubertal decrease in the BMC/LTM ratio z-score shows a gradual dissociation of the usually close relation between BMC and LTM.

Volumetric BMD. Mean vBMD z-scores were not different between the three pubertal groups at the LS (P = 0.34) and the FN (P = 0.12) (Table 2Go). LS vBMD z-scores of prepubertal subjects decreased significantly with age (r = -0.61; P < 0.001) but were constant thereafter. This trend was not observed at the FN (Fig. 3Go). Osteopenia, defined as vBMD z-scores of <–1.5, was found in 12 of 76 subjects (15.8%) at the LS and in 21 of 74 subjects (28.4%) at the FN.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. vBMD results for the LS and the FN, given as age z-scores. LS z-scores of prepubertal subjects decreased significantly (r = -0.61; P < 0.001) but remained constant in pubertal subjects. No significant trend was observed at the FN. Osteopenia is defined as a z-score <–1.5 SD (dashed line).

 
Total and regional results in relation to age, puberty, GH or oxandrolone therapy, and karyotype. Osteopenia at all three examined sites (TB, LS, and FN) was found in 6 of 83 subjects (7.2%). Five were prepubertal, aged 13.83 (SD = 0.58; range, 13.1–14.5) yr, and one subject was postmenarchal, aged 18.8 yr. There were no significant differences in any of the DXA measurements between subjects with spontaneous or induced puberty and between subjects with mosaicism and 45XO karyotypes. Subjects on treatment with GH (n = 42) at the time of assessment tended to have a greater height z-score (–2.26) than in the untreated (n = 41) group (–2.65); P = 0.085. No differences were found in TB and regional DXA measurements apart from a lower percent TB fat (P = 0.004) in the GH-treated group. Treatment with oxandrolone did not result in significant differences in DXA measurements.

Longitudinal study

Baseline characteristics of all prepubertal subjects and the 2-yr change in DXA variables are given in Table 3Go. Due to the quite unexpected development of spontaneous puberty in five subjects and the pubertal induction in another patient during the study period, we were able to study the effect of puberty. The increase in height over 2 yr was 13.93 (2.51) and 15.03 (3.20) cm in the prepubertal (n = 11) and the pubertal group (n = 6), respectively. Subjects entering puberty had a significantly greater increase in TB BMC (P = 0.007) and LTM (P = 0.022) compared with subjects remaining prepubertal (Table 3Go). The change in the z-scores for the TB DXA measures and height over 24 months for both groups is plotted in Fig. 4Go. Whereas all subjects increased their height z-scores during GH therapy, TB BMC z-scores decreased by -0.28 (0.31) in the group remaining prepubertal but increased by 0.71 (0.56) in pubertal subjects (P = 0.007). The corresponding change in LTM z-scores was 0.28 (0.49) and 1.07 (0.75); P = 0.031. Similar to our cross-sectional study, we calculated the individual difference between observed and predicted BMC z-scores. The mean change over 24 months for this difference was -0.70 (0.30) in the prepubertal group and -0.06 (0.45) in the pubertal group (P = 0.003). The decreasing z-score of the BMC/LTM ratio in prepubertal subjects shows the dissociation between muscle and bone mass. Changes in vBMD and corresponding z-scores were not significantly different between the two groups. LS vBMD z-score changed by -0.49 (0.89) in the prepubertal and -0.09 (0.62) in the pubertal group. The corresponding change in FN vBMD z-score was -0.39 (0.45) and -0.22 (1.07). Groups did not differ in GH dose or baseline bone age, nor was there any relation between GH dose and the change in z-scores of anthropometric and DXA measures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Baseline characteristics of the longitudinal study population (when all subjects were prepubertal) and the absolute change in DXA variables over 2 yr

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Longitudinal change over 24 months in age z-scores for TB DXA measures and height. Bars represent mean (±SD) for subjects remaining prepubertal (open bars) and subjects entering puberty (filled bars).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The results of the cross-sectional and longitudinal study analogously indicate that the lack of puberty leads to low BMC accrual and also suggest a critical role of prepubertal estrogen in TS. In the prepubertal group, the size-corrected TB BMC and LS vBMD z-scores decreased significantly with age, but the decrease ceased with the onset of puberty. However, the marked muscle-bone dissociation and the reduction in FN vBMD, the most affected site in our study, were found at all ages, suggesting an additional intrinsic bone defect. Our cross-sectional database is the largest reported so far in the literature, covering an age range from childhood to young adulthood.

The prepubertal decrease in TB BMC and LTM z-scores in our study mainly reflects the age-related decrease in height z-score due to the planar nature of DXA. The lack of a pubertal growth spurt in comparison with control subjects contributes to this decrease. However, TB BMC accrual was less than predicted for height z-score during the extended prepubertal period (Fig. 2Go), and most subjects classified osteopenic were in late prepuberty. The LS vBMD z-score also decreased prepubertally, which is consistent with results obtained from a study using QCT, where cancellous LS vBMD decreased significantly prepubertally (20).

Prepubertal estradiol levels are reduced in girls with TS compared with controls (31), which may lead to low bone mass, similar to that observed in aromatase deficiency (32). The fact that osteopenia in our study (except the FN) was mainly found in late prepuberty suggests a critical role of estrogen on BMC accretion at age 10–14 yr or a delayed skeletal response to the low prepubertal estrogen levels. In contrast to others (14), we suggest that the risk of rendering subjects osteopenic by delaying pubertal induction to the currently recommended age of 15 yr (23) is clinically relevant. There are concerns that estrogen accelerates skeletal maturity with a consequent reduction in final height. However, recent studies from the Dutch group suggest that final height is not compromised by early (12.7 yr) induction of puberty (33).

The role of estrogen is further supported by a study reporting greater BMD values in adult women with TS who had menstruated spontaneously compared with a TS group in whom puberty had been induced. The main difference between the groups was the exposure to prepubertal estrogen (34). Another study has reported comparable findings (35). Young women with TS on estrogen supplementation also have normal radial trabecular vBMD (19) and normal (18) or slightly reduced (3) LS vBMD. However, low size-corrected LS areal BMD in adults with TS was also reported (2). Insufficient estrogen treatment causes low vertebral bone mass (10), and the duration of treatment was positively correlated to BMD (3, 11). In addition, estrogen is reported to preserve bone at the endocortical surface (36, 37, 38). Therefore, the lack of estrogen may contribute to the decreased endocortical apposition at the upper extremities during puberty (19, 39) and to the increased bone remodeling (3, 10, 40) reported in TS.

There are, however, reasons to suggest an additional, intrinsic bone defect associated with the syndrome from our study. In contrast to other sites, there was a reduction in FN vBMD and a dissociation of bone and muscle measures throughout all age groups. The low FN vBMD found in our study may be of clinical relevance for two reasons. First, the weight-bearing femur is exposed to a frequently overweight child with TS (41). In contrast to adults, obesity is not protective of fractures in children (42). Second, fracture rate is increased in adults with TS at frequent fracture sites (2, 4, 6), including a 5-fold fracture risk at the FN (4). However, the 9% reduction compared with healthy controls found in the only study assessing FN vBMD in adult women so far, was not significant (3). Regional differences in bone mass have also been observed in other studies using a variety of bone imaging techniques. Generally, bone mass at cortical sites like the radius (1, 7, 8, 19) appears more affected than at the LS (8, 43). In accordance with these studies and a study in adults (3), our results suggest regional differences in bone mass in TS, which may have implications for future fracture risk. Future prospective studies will have to evaluate regional differences in bone mass, geometry, and particularly fracture risk in TS.

Despite the major role of muscle force and mass on bone strength (21, 22), the muscle-bone relation in TS has been addressed only in one study so far (19). Muscle size at the radius using pQCT was reported normal for age in 21 young women with TS, but BMC and cortical size were reduced for age. A similar dissociation of muscle and bone mass was found at all ages in our study (Table 2Go and Fig. 1DGo). The major decrease in the z-score for the BMC/LTM ratio was observed prepubertally with a subsequent tendency toward improvement after the onset of puberty. TB (30, 44, 45) and forearm studies (46) document greater bone mass accretion for a given muscle mass in pubertal girls than boys, in line with the mechanostat view of estrogen action (36). The muscle-bone dissociation in TS indicates that estrogen deficiency has a more pronounced effect on bone than on muscle mass, an effect that can be seen in our longitudinal results (Fig. 4Go).

Correcting DXA output for bone or body size is essential as areal BMC or BMD z-scores of down to -5 could be misinterpreted as osteoporosis in children with short stature. In the absence of official guidelines in children, we defined osteopenia as a TB BMC score >1.5 SD lower than predicted for height z-score and as vBMD z-scores <–1.5 SD. Using -1.5 SD as a cutoff, 14.5% (TB), 15.8% (LS), and 28.5% (FN) of TS subjects were classified osteopenic, which is higher than the 6.7% expected for normal subjects. Many other studies found normal bone mass in children with TS when corrections for body size were made (8, 14, 17). Size-corrected values for the LS and the TB were even reported above the normal mean (14), which may be attributable to the bulky skeletal phenotype specific for TS. The finding of normal periosteal (but not endosteal) bone size for age at the radius (19) supports this interpretation.

Longitudinal studies in Turner girls are rare. Shaw et al. (17) measured LS areal BMD over 2.5 yr and found decreasing size-corrected values in nine of 14 patients. However, their subjects ranged widely in age and were on different treatment regimens. Other, smaller studies (7, 13, 47) showed inconclusive results. In the only longitudinal study that assessed the effect of puberty in 10 patients, the increase in LS and TB bone mass over a mean of 1.34 yr appeared to be greater in the estrogen-treated group (14). Our study confirms their findings but also found a marked dissociation between TB bone mass and both height and LTM between subjects remaining prepubertal and subjects entering puberty. Although both groups crossed height centiles upwards supported by GH, the lack of estrogen caused a decrease in BMC accrual and a lower increase in LTM in the prepubertal group. Our results are supported by the increase in calcium absorption and a decrease in bone turnover observed during puberty in TS (48, 49).

Several studies have suggested a positive role of GH on BMD in TS (12, 14, 15) but longitudinal studies are not convincing (12, 13, 17). It is unclear whether the gain in bone mass could exceed the GH-induced height gain. In our study, there was no difference in any of the DXA z-scores between the GH-treated and the untreated group, nor did we observe an increase in vBMD at the FN or the LS in the longitudinal study. In agreement with previous studies (2, 5, 11, 34, 35), karyotype and bone mass measures were not correlated.

In conclusion, osteopenia in late prepuberty is not uncommon in young women with TS, suggesting a potential role of prepubertal estrogen. Estrogen supplementation is essential to improve BMC accrual during growth in TS. In the timing of pubertal induction, the risk of rendering subjects osteopenic needs to be weighed up against a potential reduction in final height. The reduction of FN vBMD and the bone-muscle dissociation at all ages suggests an additional intrinsic bone defect.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Chang Tao for his contribution to data collection and Fabian Yap for reviewing the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
This study was funded, in part, by an Erwin-Schrödinger Fellowship of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and the University of Innsbruck, Austria.

Abbreviations: BMC, Bone mineral content; BMI, body mass index; DXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; FN, femoral neck; LS, lumbar spine; LTM, lean mass; pQCT, peripheral quantitative computer tomography; TB, total body; TS, Turner syndrome; vBMD, volumetric bone mineral density.

Received May 5, 2003.

Accepted September 17, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rubin K 1998 Turner syndrome and osteoporosis: mechanisms and prognosis. Pediatrics 102:481–485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Davies MC, Gulekli B, Jacobs HS 1995 Osteoporosis in Turner’s syndrome and other forms of primary amenorrhoea. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 43:741–746[Medline]
  3. Gravholt CH, Lauridsen AL, Brixen K, Mosekilde L, Heickendorff L, Christiansen JS 2002 Marked disproportionality in bone size and mineral, and distinct abnormalities in bone markers and calcitropic hormones in adult Turner syndrome: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2798–2808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gravholt CH, Juul S, Naeraa RW, Hansen J 1998 Morbidity in Turner syndrome. J Clin Epidemiol 51:147–158[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Bryman I, Windh M, Wilhelmsen L 1999 Osteoporosis and fractures in Turner syndrome: importance of growth promoting and oestrogen therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51:497–502[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Gravholt CH, Vestergaard P, Hermann AP, Mosekilde L, Brixen K, Christiansen JS 2003 Increased fracture rates in Turner’s syndrome: a nationwide questionnaire survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 59:89–96[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Shore RM, Chesney RW, Mazess RB, Rose PG, Bargman GJ 1982 Skeletal demineralization in Turner’s syndrome. Calcif Tissue Int 34:519–522[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ross JL, Long LM, Feuillan P, Cassorla F, Cutler Jr GB 1991 Normal bone density of the wrist and spine and increased wrist fractures in girls with Turner’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:355–359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bercu BB, Kramer SS, Bode HH 1976 A useful radiologic sign for the diagnosis of Turner’s syndrome. Pediatrics 58:737–739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Stepan JJ, Musilova J, Pacovsky V 1989 Bone demineralization, biochemical indices of bone remodeling, and estrogen replacement therapy in adults with Turner’s syndrome. J Bone Miner Res 4:193–198[Medline]
  11. Naeraa RW, Brixen K, Hansen RM, Hasling C, Mosekilde L, Andresen JH, Charles P, Nielsen J 1991 Skeletal size and bone mineral content in Turner’s syndrome: relation to karyotype, estrogen treatment, physical fitness, and bone turnover. Calcif Tissue Int 49:77–83[Medline]
  12. Sas TC, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Stijnen T, van Teunenbroek A, van Leeuwen WJ, Asarfi A, van Rijn RR, Drop SL 2001 Bone mineral density assessed by phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry before and during long-term growth hormone treatment in girls with Turner’s syndrome participating in a randomized dose-response study. Pediatr Res 50:417–422[Medline]
  13. Bergmann P, Valsamis J, Van Perborgh J, De Schepper J, Van Vliet G 1990 Comparative study of the changes in insulin-like growth factor-I, procollagen-III N-terminal extension peptide, bone Gla-protein, and bone mineral content in children with Turner’s syndrome treated with recombinant growth hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:1461–1467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Neely EK, Marcus R, Rosenfeld RG, Bachrach LK 1993 Turner syndrome adolescents receiving growth hormone are not osteopenic. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:861–866[Abstract]
  15. Lanes R, Gunczler P, Paoli M, Weisinger JR 1995 Bone mineral density of prepubertal age girls with Turner’s syndrome while on growth hormone therapy. Horm Res 44:168–171[Medline]
  16. Prentice A, Parsons TJ, Cole TJ 1994 Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants. Am J Clin Nutr 60:837–842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Shaw NJ, Rehan VK, Husain S, Marshall T, Smith CS 1997 Bone mineral density in Turner’s syndrome: a longitudinal study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47:367–370[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Bertelloni S, Cinquanta L, Baroncelli GI, Simi P, Rossi S, Saggese G 2000 Volumetric bone mineral density in young women with Turner’s syndrome treated with estrogens or estrogens plus growth hormone. Horm Res 53:72–76[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Bechtold S, Rauch F, Noelle V, Donhauser S, Neu CM, Schoenau E, Schwarz HP 2001 Musculoskeletal analyses of the forearm in young women with Turner syndrome: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5819–5823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Nanao K, Tsuchiya Y, Kotoh S, Hasegawa Y 2002 Low vertebral cancellous bone density in peripubertal girls with Turner’s syndrome and boys with hypogonadism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 15:1537–1542[Medline]
  21. Frost HM, Schonau E 2000 The "muscle-bone unit" in children and adolescents: a 2000 overview. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 13:571–590[Medline]
  22. Frost HM 2001 From Wolff’s law to the Utah paradigm: insights about bone physiology and its clinical applications. Anat Rec 262:398–419[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Saenger P, Wikland KA, Conway GS, Davenport M, Gravholt CH, Hintz R, Hovatta O, Hultcrantz M, Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Lin A, Lippe B, Pasquino AM, Ranke MB, Rosenfeld R, Silberbach M 2001 Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3061–3069[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hamill PV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, Reed RB, Roche AF, Moore WM 1979 Physical growth: National Center for Health Statistics percentiles. Am J Clin Nutr 32:607–629[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cronk CE, Roche AF 1982 Race- and sex-specific reference data for triceps and subscapular skinfolds and weight/stature. Am J Clin Nutr 35:347–354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH 2000 Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320:1240–1243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tanner JM 1978 Physical growth and development. In: Forfar JO, Arnell CC, eds. Textbook of pediatrics. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 249–303
  28. Ogle GD, Allen JR, Humphries IR, Lu PW, Briody JN, Morley K, Howman-Giles R, Cowell CT 1995 Body-composition assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in subjects aged 4–26 y. Am J Clin Nutr 61:746–753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lu PW, Cowell CT, LLoyd-Jones SA, Briody JN, Howman-Giles R 1996 Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5–27 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1586–1590[Abstract]
  30. Högler W, Briody J, Woodhead H, Chan A, Cowell CT 2003 Importance of lean mass in the interpretation of total body densitometry in children and adolescents. J Pediatr 143:81–88[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Wilson CA, Heinrichs C, Larmore KA, Craen M, Brown-Dawson J, Shaywitz S, Ross J, Klein KO 2003 Estradiol levels in girls with Turner’s syndrome compared to normal prepubertal girls as determined by an ultrasensitive assay. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 16:91–96[Medline]
  32. Mullis PE, Yoshimura N, Kuhlmann B, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Harada H 1997 Aromatase deficiency in a female who is compound heterozygote for two new point mutations in the P450arom gene: impact of estrogens on hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, multicystic ovaries, and bone densitometry in childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1739–1745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. van Pareren YK, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Stijnen T, Sas TC, Jansen M, Otten BJ, Hoorweg-Nijman JJ, Vulsma T, Stokvis-Brantsma WH, Rouwe CW, Reeser HM, Gerver WJ, Gosen JJ, Rongen-Westerlaken C, Drop SL 2003 Final height in girls with Turner syndrome after long-term growth hormone treatment in three dosages and low dose estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1119–1125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Carrascosa A, Gussinye M, Terradas P, Yeste D, Audi L, Vicens-Calvet E 2000 Spontaneous, but not induced, puberty permits adequate bone mass acquisition in adolescent Turner syndrome patients. J Bone Miner Res 15:2005–2010[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Costa AM, Lemos-Marini SH, Baptista MT, Morcillo AM, Maciel-Guerra AT, Guerra G, Jr. 2002 Bone mineralization in Turner syndrome: a transverse study of the determinant factors in 58 patients. J Bone Miner Metab 20:294–297[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Frost HM 1999 On the estrogen-bone relationship and postmenopausal bone loss: a new model. J Bone Miner Res 14:1473–1477[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F, Schoenau E 2001 Modeling of cross-sectional bone size, mass and geometry at the proximal radius: a study of normal bone development using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 12:538–547[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Seeman E 2001 Clinical review 137: sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4576–4584[Free Full Text]
  39. Dequeker J 1971 Periosteal and endosteal surface remodeling in pathologic conditions. Invest Radiol 6:260–265[Medline]
  40. Rauch F, Seibel M, Woitge H, Kruse K, Schonau E 1995 Increased urinary excretion of collagen crosslinks in girls with Ullrich-Turner syndrome. Acta Paediatr 84:66–69[Medline]
  41. Hojbjerg GC, Weis NR 1997 Reference values for body proportions and body composition in adult women with Ullrich-Turner syndrome. Am J Med Genet 72:403–408[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Whiting SJ 2002 Obesity is not protective for bones in childhood and adolescence. Nutr Rev 60:27–30[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Rubin K. 1990 Osteoporosis in Turner syndrome. In: Rosenfeld R, Grumbach M, eds. Turner syndrome. New York: Marcel Dekker; 301–317
  44. Schiessl H, Frost HM, Jee WS 1998 Estrogen and bone-muscle strength and mass relationships. Bone 22:1–6[Medline]
  45. Ferretti JL, Cointry GR, Capozza RF, Frost HM 2003 Bone mass, bone strength, muscle-bone interactions, osteopenias and osteoporoses. Mech Ageing Dev 124:269–279[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Schoenau E, Neu CM, Mokov E, Wassmer G, Manz F 2000 Influence of puberty on muscle area and cortical bone area of the forearm in boys and girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1095–1098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Mora S, Weber G, Guarneri MP, Nizzoli G, Pasolini D, Chiumello G 1992 Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on bone mineral content in girls with Turner syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 79:747–751[Medline]
  48. Beckett PR, Copeland KC, Flannery TK, Sherman LD, Abrams SA 1999 Combination growth hormone and estrogen increase bone mineralization in girls with Turner syndrome. Pediatr Res 45:709–713[Medline]
  49. Mauras N, Vieira NE, Yergey AL 1997 Estrogen therapy enhances calcium absorption and retention and diminishes bone turnover in young girls with Turner’s syndrome: a calcium kinetic study. Metabolism 46:908–913[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
L. Cleemann, B. E Hjerrild, A. L Lauridsen, L. Heickendorff, J. S Christiansen, L. Mosekilde, and C. H Gravholt
Long-term hormone replacement therapy preserves bone mineral density in Turner syndrome
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 161(2): 251 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATION AND PRACTICEHome page
N J Shaw
Osteoporosis in paediatrics
Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., December 1, 2007; 92(6): 169 - 175.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Bondy and for The Turner Syndrome Consensus Study Group
Care of Girls and Women with Turner Syndrome: A Guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 10 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. H. Gravholt, B. E. Hjerrild, L. Mosekilde, T. K. Hansen, L. M. Rasmussen, J. Frystyk, A. Flyvbjerg, and J. S. Christiansen
Body composition is distinctly altered in Turner syndrome: relations to glucose metabolism, circulating adipokines, and endothelial adhesion molecules.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 155(4): 583 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Soriano-Guillen, J. Coste, E. Ecosse, J. Leger, M. Tauber, S. Cabrol, M. Nicolino, R. Brauner, the StaTur Study Group, J.-L. Chaussain, et al.
Adult Height and Pubertal Growth in Turner Syndrome after Treatment with Recombinant Growth Hormone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5197 - 5204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
P E Clayton, R C Cuneo, A Juul, J P Monson, S M Shalet, and M Tauber
Consensus statement on the management of the GH-treated adolescent in the transition to adult care
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 152(2): 165 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
V. P. Sybert and E. McCauley
Turner's Syndrome
N. Engl. J. Med., September 16, 2004; 351(12): 1227 - 1238.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Yap, W. Hogler, J. Briody, B. Moore, R. Howman-Giles, and C. T. Cowell
The Skeletal Phenotype of Men with Previous Constitutional Delay of Puberty
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4306 - 4311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Högler, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Högler, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cowell, C. T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals