help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masuyama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masuyama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, T.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 9 4446-4454
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Expression and Potential Roles of Pregnane X Receptor in Endometrial Cancer

Hisashi Masuyama, Yuji Hiramatsu, Jun-ichi Kodama and Takafumi Kudo

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Medical School, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Hisashi Masuyama, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Medical School, 2-5-1, Shikata, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. E-mail: masuyama{at}cc.okayama-u.ac.jp.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Estrogen has been shown to contribute greatly to growth and development in endometrial cancer. And recent research has suggested that intratumoral production of estrogen may play important roles in this cancer tissue. On the other hand, pregnane X receptor (PXR), a new member of nuclear receptors, has been shown to mediate the genomic effects of steroid hormones, including estrogen and xenobiotics. And this receptor is thought to regulate the expression of the cytochrome P-450 3A (CYP3A) gene family, which plays important roles in the metabolism of endogenous steroids and xenobiotics. Various levels of PXR expression were found in endometrial cancer tissues but not normal tissues. Tissues showing high PXR expression showed significantly high expression of CYP3A4/7 and low expression of estrogen receptor (ER) compared with levels in tissues showing low PXR expression. In endometrial cancer cell lines, HEC-1 cells, which express high PXR and low ER and progesterone receptor, show a stronger transcriptional response of the PXR-CYP3A pathway to the PXR ligands, especially endocrine-disrupting chemical, than do Ishikawa cells. These data suggest that the steroid/xenobiotics metabolism in the tumor tissue through PXR-CYP3A pathway might play an important role, especially in alternative pathway for gonadal hormone and endocrine-disrupting chemical effects on endometrial cancer expressing low ER{alpha}.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN MOST HUMAN endometrial cancers, especially endometrioid carcinoma, estrogen has been shown to contribute greatly to growth and development; this tumor actually requires estrogen for continued growth (1). The activity of aromatase, which is responsible for the conversion of circulating androgen to estrone, a biologically active estrogen, has been shown to be detectable in the endometrium and its disorders and to be significantly higher in neoplastic endometrium than in normal tissues (2, 3). The activities of estrone sulfatase, by which estrone sulfate, a major circulating plasma estrogen, is converted into estrone, in endometrial cancer tissues were significantly higher than those in normal endometrium (4). These enzymes may be involved in providing biologically active estrogen in endometrial carcinoma. Thus, these findings supported the hypothesis that intratumoral production of estrogen may play some roles in tumor growth and development in endometrial cancer tissues (5).

Pregnane X receptor (PXR), a new member of the steroid receptor superfamily, has been shown to mediate the genomic effects of several steroid hormones, including progesterone (P), pregnenolone, and estrogen, and of xenobiotics in the mouse, rat, and human (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Like nonsteroid hormone receptors, it binds as a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor to specific DNA sequences, including the upstream region of the cytochrome P-450 3A (CYP3A) gene family (6, 7, 8, 11), which consists of monooxygenases responsible for the oxidative metabolism of certain endogenous substrates and xenobiotics (13, 14). Because the PXR-CYP3A4 pathway is activated by a large number of prescription drugs for infection, cancer, convulsion, and hypertension (15), PXR is thought to play some roles in drug metabolism and drug-drug interaction. Recent research demonstrated that PXR regulates the metabolism of bile acid, which is essential for the elimination of excess cholesterol from the body and the transport of dietary lipids in the intestine (16). These data suggest that PXR regulates an entire program of genes in the liver and intestine that are involved in the metabolism and elimination of potentially toxic substrates from the body (15). In addition, we have demonstrated the expression of PXR in mouse reproductive tissues, uterine and ovary, as well as liver and intestine, and that the expressions of PXR and CYP3A1 in the liver and ovary significantly increased with the progression of hypersteroidemia evaluated toward term during pregnancy, suggesting that PXR may play a role in regulation of the steroid hormone metabolism during reproduction (17).

In this study, we examined whether PXR was expressed in endometrial cancer tissues and investigated the relationship between PXR expression and the status of the estrogen receptor (ER) and the P receptor (PR). Because both CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 are target genes for human PXR (6, 7, 11) and play important roles of steroid metabolism in human endometrium (18), we also analyzed the expression of CYP3A4/7 in endometrial cancer tissues and compared it with PXR expression. Then we conducted in vitro experiments using endometrial cancer cell lines to examine whether a variety of PXR ligands activated the PXR-mediated transcription and affected the expression of CYP3A. The data suggested that the steroid/xenobiotics metabolism by the tumor tissue through PXR-CYP3A pathway might play an important role in endometrial cancer, especially in an alternative pathway for gonadal hormone and endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDC) effects on endometrial cancer expressing low ER{alpha}.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Materials

Isopropylidenediphenol (bisphenol A), phthalic acid bis (2-ethylhexel ester) (phthalic acid), 5-Pregneno-3ß-ol-20-one (pregnenolone), P, and 17ß-estradiol (E2) were purchased from Sigma Co. Ltd. (St. Louis, MO). Ishikawa cells were kindly provided by Dr. M. Nishida; and HEC-1 cells, BeWo cells, and COLO320 cells were obtained from the Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan).

Patients and tissue samples

Endometrial cancer tissues were obtained from 43 patients who had undergone surgical resection at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Okayama University Hospital. Pathological diagnosis of all patients was endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Eleven nonneoplastic endometrial tissues (four cases at the proliferative phase, four cases at the secretory phase, and three cases who took oral contraceptives for uterine bleeding) were also obtained from patients who had undergone hysterectomy attributable to uterine cervical cancer (stage 0 or Ia). An International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system was used for the grading and staging of endometrial carcinoma and cervical cancer in this study. As positive control for PXR and CYP3A4/7, a normal small intestine tissue was obtained from a patient who had undergone surgical resection at the Department of Surgery in our university. Informed consent was obtained from all patients, and this study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections, 4-µm thick, were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated in ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by methanol containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase for 15 min. The sections were then treated at 4 C overnight with primary antibody for PXR (A-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) (1:100 dilution) followed by staining using a streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase kit (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). For negative control, we used normal goat IgG instead of primary antibody for PXR; and for the immunohistochemical preabsorption test, we used the antibody for PXR, which was incubated with a 5-fold excess of blocking peptide for PXR antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) at 4 C overnight. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Two observers, who were blinded for the immunohistochemical-related data, evaluated the PXR labeling index independently. The labeling index was calculated as the percentage of labeled nuclei of the total number of tumor cells counted.

RT-PCR

Frozen tissues of normal endometrium and endometrial cancer were homogenized, and total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kits (QIAGEN Gmbh, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was also extracted from endometrial cancer cells using Trizol reagent (Life Technology, Inc., Grand Island, NY). Each sample was treated with deoxyribonuclease I to remove genomic DNA contamination. According to the protocol of the RNA PCR kit (TAKARA Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan), 0.1 µg total RNA was reverse transcribed at 42 C for 20 min in 20 µl reaction solution containing 1x PCR buffer, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 2.5 µM random 9 mers primer, 10 U ribonuclease inhibitor, and 5 U avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase. The primers for human CYP3A4/7, PXR, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were as follows: CYP3A4/7 sense: 5'-CAAGACCCCTTTGTGGAAAA-3', 3' antisense: 5'-AAATCCACTCGGTGCTTTTG-3', PXR sense: 5'-TCCGGAAAGATCTGTGTGCTCT-3', 3' antisense: 5'-AGGGAGATCTGGTCCTCGAT-3', GAPDH sense: 5'-CGAGATCCCTCCAAAATCAA-3', 3' antisense: 5'-GTCTTCTGGGTGGCAGTGAT-3'. The primers for human CYP3A4/7 used here amplified both CYP3A4 and 3A7 as the same size of PCR product. Amplification for CYP3A4/7, PXR, and GAPDH was carried out on a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with initial denaturation at 94 C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 C for 30 sec, 60 C for 30 sec, 72 C for 30 sec, and a final extension at 72 C for 2 min. The number of PCR cycles resulting in PCR products in the linear logarithmic phase of the amplification curve was determined. PCR samples were electrophoresed on 3% {nu}-Sieve agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide. The amount of each electrophorectically separated cDNA was quantitated densitometrically using an Image Scanner GT-9500 (Epson, Suwa, Japan) and Bio Image BQ 2.0 software (Bio Image, Ann Arbor, MI).

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)

Because there are several reports demonstrating that EIA correlated with immunohistochemical analysis and ligand binding assay to evaluate ER and PR status (19, 20, 21) and we clinically used EIA instead of immunohistochemical analysis and ligand binding assay as a laboratory tool, the ER-{alpha} and PR status were determined by EIA (Dynabott Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) in this study. Briefly, tissue samples obtained at surgery were immediately frozen and stored at -80 C until assay. Tissue specimens were thawed quickly, minced, and suspended in 5 vol of the buffer (T-PER Protein Extraction Reagent; Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) at 4 C. After homonization, samples were prepared by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 15 min, and the supernatants were used for the assay. The EIA for ER and PR was carried out by a solid-phase assay based on a sandwich method according to the manufacture’s protocol. We did immunohistochemical analysis for ER-{alpha} and PR to compare with the EIA data using six cases of endometrial cancer tissues investigated in this study There were positive correlations between EIA and labeling index for ER-{alpha} and PR (data not shown). Positive ER-{alpha} status was defined as more than 13 fmol/mg protein, and that of PR status as more than 10 fmol/mg protein. And these EIA assays for both receptors couldn’t detect under 5 fmol/mg protein.

Transient transfection studies

The (CYP3A4)3-tk-chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) containing three copies of the CYP3A4 motif and pSG5-PXR expression plasmid containing full-length human PXR cDNA were kindly provided by Dr. S. A. Kliewer (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) (7). Ishikawa cells and HEC-1 cells were cotransfected with 1 µg of a reporter gene construct [(CYP3A4)3-tk-CAT] or tk-CAT vector. In all transfections, liposome-mediated transfections were accomplished by using lipofectamine (Life Technologies Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Transfected cells were treated either with vehicle alone or with the indicated concentrations of steroid hormones or EDCs for 36 h. The cell extracts were prepared and assayed for CAT activity. The amount of CAT was determined using a CAT ELISA kit (Roche Diagnostics Co., Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Cell culture and Western blot analysis

All cell lines except BeWo cells were cultured in DMEM without phenol red, supplemented with 10% charcoal-striped fetal bovine serum. BeWo cells were cultured in F-12K medium without phenol red, supplemented with 15% charcoal-striped fetal bovine serum. All medium and serum were purchased from Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA). Nuclear extracts were obtained from both cell types using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Pierce Chemical Co.) according to the manufacture’s protocol and stored at -80 C until analysis. Equivalent amounts of nuclear protein (25 µg/sample) from each extract were determined by bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce Chemical Co.), solubilized in sodium dodecyl sulfate buffer (0.05 M Tris-HCl, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 6% mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, pH 6.8) and analyzed by Western blot analysis as previously described (22) using rabbit polyclonal antibody for ER-{alpha} (MC-20; 1:1000 dilution), PR (H-190; 1:1000 dilution), and ß-actin (H-196; 1:1000 dilution) and goat polyclonal antibody for PXR (A-20; 1:1000 dilution) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). The amount of each band was quantitated densitometrically using Image Scanner GT-9500 (Epson) and Bio Image BQ 2.0 software.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was evaluated by {chi}2 test and Mann-Whitney U test in Table 1Go (also see Figs. 3Go and 4Go), and one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (see Figs. 5Go and 6Go). Data are the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denoted the presence of a statistically significant difference.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. No significant relationship between clinical and pathological characteristics and PXR expression in endometrial cancer cases

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Relationship of the PXR expression to the ER-{alpha} and PR status in endometrial cancer tissues. A, The ER-{alpha} status measured by EIA was compared between the high-PXR-expression group (n = 22) and low-PXR-expression group (n = 21). The results represent the mean ± SD (*, P < 0.01). B, The PR status measured by EIA was compared between the high-PXR-expression group (n = 22) and low-PXR-expression group (n = 21). The results represent the mean ± SD.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Relationship of the PXR expression to the expression of CYP3A4/7 mRNA in endometrial cancer tissues. The total RNA obtained from 20 cases of endometrial cancer tissues and analyzed for the expression of CYP3A4/7 and GAPDH mRNA using semicompetitive RT-PCR. The PCR products were separated on 3% {nu}-Sieve agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide. The band intensities were densitometrically measured and quantified using Image Scanner T-9500 and Bio Image software. The expression of CYP3A4/7 mRNA was compared between the high-PXR-expression group (n = 10) and the low-PXR-expression group (n = 10). The results represent the mean ± SD (*, P < 0.01). The RNA extraction of normal small intestine was used as positive control, and the PCR procedure without the primers for CYPA4/7 was done for negative control.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. The effect of PXR ligands on the PXR-mediated transcription in endometrial cancer cells. A, Nuclear extracts of subconfluent Ishikawa, COLO320 DM, BeWo, and HEC-1 cells were prepared as described in Patients and Methods. Equivalent amounts of each extract (25 µg/sample) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and PXR protein levels were determined by Western blotting using anti-ER-{alpha}, PR, PXR, and ß-actin antibody. Each bar represents the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. B, HEC-1 cells were transfected with 1 µg of the (CYP3A4)3-tk-CAT reporter gene construct or tk-CAT vector. The cells were treated with ethanol vehicle or 10-6 M steroids or EDCs for 36 h. The amount of CAT was determined with a CAT ELISA kit (Roche Diagnostics Co.) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The results represent the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations (*, P < 0.01 compared with ethanol-treated control). The number above each bar represents fold increase relative to the ethanol-treated control. C, Ishikawa cells were transfected with 1 µg of the (CYP3A4) (3 )-tk-CAT reporter gene construct or tk-CAT vector. The cells were treated with ethanol vehicle or 10-6 M steroids or EDCs for 36 h. The amount of CAT was determined with a CAT ELISA kit. The results represent the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations (*, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05 compared with ethanol-treated control). The number above each bar represents fold increase relative to the ethanol-treated control.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. The effect of ligands for PXR on the expression of PXR and CYP3A4/7 in endometrial cancer cells. A, HEC-1 cells were treated with ethanol, various steroids, or EDCs for 24 h. The total RNA obtained from the cells was analyzed for the expression of CYP3A4/7 and GAPDH mRNA using semicompetitive RT-PCR as described in Fig. 4Go. The results represent the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations (*, P < 0.01). B, Ishikawa cells were treated with ethanol, various steroids, or EDCs for 24 h. The total RNA obtained from the cells was analyzed for the expression of CYP3A4/7 and GAPDH mRNA using semicompetitive RT-PCR as described in Fig. 4Go. The results represent the mean ± SD of triplicate determinations (*, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.05). C, HEC-1 cells were treated with ethanol, various steroids, or EDCs for 48 h, and nuclear extracts were prepared as described in Patients and Methods. Equivalent amounts of each extract (25 µg/sample) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and PXR protein levels were determined by Western blotting using anti-PXR antibody. As a loading control, ß-actin protein levels were also examined using anti-ß-actin antibody. And the total RNA obtained from the cells was analyzed for the expression of PXR and GAPDH mRNA using semicompetitive RT-PCR. Each bar represents the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*, P < 0.01). D, Ishikawa cells were treated with ethanol, various steroids, or EDCs for 48 h and nuclear extracts were prepared as described in Patients and Methods. Equivalent amounts of each extract (25 µg/sample) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and PXR protein levels were determined by Western blotting using anti-PXR antibody. As a loading control, ß-actin protein levels were also examined using anti-ß-actin antibody. And the total RNA obtained from the cells was analyzed for the expression of PXR and GAPDH mRNA using semicompetitive RT-PCR. Each bar represents the mean ± SD from three independent experiments (*, P < 0.01).

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PXR expression in endometrial cancer tissues

Because we found that the PXR was expressed in uterine tissues of mouse by RT-PCR (17) and mouse endometrium by immunohistochemistry (data not shown), immunohistochemical analysis was performed to examine whether PXR was expressed in normal endometrium and endometrial cancer tissues in human. In normal endometrium, we could not detect PXR expression of all patients at the proliferative phase (n = 4, Fig. 1AGo) or the secretory phase (n = 4, Fig. 1BGo), but PXR was expressed in glandular cells of the endometrium of all three patients who took oral contraceptives for uterine bleeding (Fig. 1CGo). These contraceptives consisted of ethinylestradiol and norethisterone, estrogen and P derivatives, could be PXR ligands (7, 15), and have been known to be substrates for CYP3A4 (23, 24). Next, we checked the expression of PXR in endometrial cancer tissues. Various proportions of nuclear staining were observed among samples from 43 endometrial cancer patients. Representative staining of high PXR expression in endometrial cancer tissues is shown in Fig. 1DGo, and that of low PXR expression is shown in Fig. 1EGo. Fig. 1FGo was described as positive control using normal human small intestine; and Fig. 1Go, G and H, were also described as negative control for verifying specificity of the antibody used in this study. The distribution of PXR labeling index in endometrial cancer tissues is illustrated in Fig. 2Go; and based on the staining, we divided these cases into two groups, a low-PXR-expression group including 15 PXR negative cases and a high-PXR-expression group, for further analysis. In 16 ER-negative cases, there are nine cases in the low-PXR-expression group and seven cases in the high-PXR-expression group. Also, in 13 PR-negative cases, there were six cases in the low-PXR-expression group and seven cases in the high-PXR-expression group. There were no significant differences of PXR expression between ER- or PR-negative cases and positive cases. In addition, no significant differences were observed between low- and high-PXR-expression groups in terms of clinicopathological factors such as grading, staging, and age (Table 1Go).



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Representative staining of PXR in nonneoplastic endometrium and endometrial cancer tissues. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using the antibody for human PXR. A, Normal endometrium at the proliferative phase. B, Normal endometrium at the secretory phase. C, The endometrium of the patient who took oral contraceptive for uterine bleeding. D, Representative staining of high PXR expression in endometrial cancer tissue. E, Representative staining of low (negative) PXR expression in endometrial cancer tissue. F, Normal small intestine as positive control. G, Same section as D, using normal goat IgG instead of primary antibody for PXR as negative control. H, Same section as D, using antibody for PXR, which was incubated with a 5-fold excess of blocking peptide at 4 C overnight for the immunohistochemical preabsorption test.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The distribution of PXR nuclear staining in endometrial cancer tissues. Based on the staining, endometrial cancer tissues were divided into two groups, a high-PXR-expression group and a low-PXR-expression group.

 
Relationship of PXR expression to the ER and PR status in endometrial cancer tissues

To examine whether PXR expression could affect the hormonal status in endometrial cancer tissues, we investigated the relationship of PXR expression to steroid hormone receptors; that is, the ER and PR status. The ER-{alpha} and PR status were measured by EIA. A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between PXR expression and ER-{alpha} status (Fig. 3AGo). In contrast, no significant relationship was observed between PXR expression and PR status (Fig. 3BGo).

Relationship of PXR expression to expression of CYP3A4/7 mRNA in endometrial cancer tissues

Next, the expression of CYP3A4/7 mRNA, which is one of target genes regulated by PXR (6, 7, 8, 11), was analyzed in normal endometrium and endometrial cancer tissues. We used the semiquantitative RT-PCR method because we had not previously been able to obtain an appropriate antibody for CYP3A4/7 for immunohistochemical analysis. The housekeeping gene, GAPDH, was used to determine the relative level of CYP3A4/7 gene transcription and to control for variations in RNA recoveries from each specimen. Normalization of the data was accomplished by quantifying the amount of amplified cDNA products by calculating the ratio of the amount of CYP3A4/7 cDNA relative to the amount of GAPDH cDNA. This ratio was used to compare the relative amount of CYP3A4/7 mRNA in each tissue specimen. CYP3A4/7 expression in normal endometrium was low (CYP3A4/7/GAPDH mRNA = 0.02 ± 0.01) and significantly increased in endometrial cancer tissues (P < 0.01). In endometrial cancer tissues, the CYP3A4/7 expression in the high-PXR-expression group was significantly higher than that in the low-PXR-expression group (Fig. 4Go). As a positive control for CYP3A4/7, we used the RNA extraction of human small intestine tissue, which has been used to show the expression of CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 (25). Comparison of PXR mRNA expression between two groups, low- and high-PXR-expression groups, by semiquantitative RT-PCR (n = 8) demonstrated that the mRNA level of PXR correlated with the protein level of PXR in our cases (data not shown).

The effect of PXR ligands on the PXR-mediated transcription in endometrial cancer cells

To examine the effect of ligands for PXR on the PXR-mediated transcription in endometrial cancer cells, Ishikawa cells and HEC-1 cells, endometrial cancer cell lines, were used to determine which cell line expressed PXR. The normalization of the data was accomplished by quantifying the amount of the band by calculating the ratio of the amount of ER-{alpha}, PR, or PXR protein relative to the amount of ß-actin protein. As shown in Fig. 5AGo, PXR was abundant in HEC-1 cells and in COLO320 DM cells (a colon cancer cell line) but was weakly detected in Ishikawa cells and in BeWo cells (a choriocarcinoma cell line). And there were inverse relationships between ER-{alpha} and PXR in all cell lines tested here. We used some EDCs (phthalate and bisphenol A) as well as the endogenous steroids estradiol, pregnenolone, and P, as PXR ligands because these chemicals have been demonstrated to activate PXR-mediated transcription in other cell lines (26, 27). A reporter gene construct [(CYP3A4)3-tk-CAT] was introduced into Ishikawa cells and HEC-1 cells. The endogenous steroids E2, pregnenolone, and P significantly activated native PXR-mediated transcription (P < 0.01); and the EDCs, bisphenol A and phthalate, also significantly activated the transcription (P < 0.01 or 0.05), but the fold increases were lower compared with those in the presence of endogenous steroids in both cell lines (Fig. 5Go, B and C). Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), however, had no effect on this transcription in both cell lines. In this transient transfection assay, the ranges of fold increase in HEC-1 cells (5.0- to 10.0-fold, Fig. 5BGo) were much higher than those in Ishikawa cells (1.9- to 4.8-fold, Fig. 5CGo).

The effect of PXR ligands on the expression of PXR and CYP3A4/7 in endometrial cancer cells

To examine the effect of PXR ligands on the expression of CYP3A4/7 in vitro, the mRNA level of CYP3A4/7 was qualitatively examined in HEC-1 cells and Ishikawa cells that had been exposed to steroids and EDCs as described in Fig. 4Go. In HEC-1 cells, CYP3A4/7 mRNA level was significantly increased in the presence of PXR ligands, which activated PXR-mediated transcription in the transient transfection assay (percent increase relative to ethanol treatment, 150–200%; Fig. 6AGo). There were no differences between endogenous steroids and EDCs. In contrast, the CYP3A4/7 mRNA level did not change in response to DDT, which did not enhance PXR-mediated transcription. In Ishikawa cells, EDCs showed a significant, but weaker, effect on CYP3A4/7 expression (percent increase, 140–150%) compared with that in HEC-1 cells (percent increase, 170–180%), but the endogenous steroids E2, P, and pregnenolone, had a significant and slightly stronger positive effect on CYP3A4/7 expression (percent increase, 195–260%) compared with that in HEC-1 cells (percent increase, 150–200%) (Fig. 6BGo). Next, we examined whether PXR ligands affected the PXR expression in both cell lines. The normalization of the data was accomplished by quantifying the amount of the band by calculating the ratio of the amount of PXR protein or cDNA product relative to the amount of ß-actin protein or GAPDH cDNA product. There were no significant differences in the protein and mRNA levels of PXR in HEC-1 cells exposed to any PXR ligands (Fig. 6CGo). However, both levels of PXR were significantly increased in the Ishikawa cells exposed to endogenous PXR ligands E2, P, and pregnenolone (3.5- to 4.5-fold). EDC, bisphenol A, and phthalate had significant, but weaker, effect (2.5- to 2.8-fold) compared with that in the presence of endogenous steroids (Fig. 6DGo).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Because PXR might play a role in the regulation of steroid hormones in reproduction (17) and because PXR was also expressed in breast cancer tissue, another estrogen-dependent neoplasm (28), we analyzed the expression of PXR and its target gene, CYP3A4/7, in endometrial cancer tissues, to examine whether PXR plays a role in the biology of endometrial cancer. PXR was not detected in normal endometrium but was expressed in the endometrium of patients who took oral contraceptives. PXR was also expressed in endometrial cancer tissues, and these tissue specimens were divided into two groups: a high-PXR-expression group and a low-PXR-expression group. In the analysis of endometrial cancer tissues, a significant inverse correlation was found between PXR and ER. The comparison of ER and PXR expression between HEC-1 (in which PXR is abundant and ER is low) and Ishikawa cells (in which PXR expression is low but ER expression is high) showed a similar expression pattern. When endometrial cancer cell lines were used, PXR ligands, especially estradiol enhanced the expression of PXR itself in Ishikawa cells but did not affect the expression in HEC-1 cells. These in vivo and in vitro data suggested that PXR-mediated pathways might be more active in endometrial tumors, which are less likely to respond to estrogen, or that the up-regulation of PXR by a local hyperestrogenic state might introduce a poor response to estrogen. On the other hand, PXR variant truncated in ligand-binding domain was detected in normal and neoplastic breast tissues (28). Because there was no report demonstrating that this truncated variant was functional in human (15), we didn’t investigate this variant in this study. And, although PXR was detected only in nucleus in endometrial cancer tissues, it was localized mainly in nucleus and weakly in cytoplasm of the oral contraceptive-exposed endometrium. Further analysis will be required for these issues.

The CYP3A subfamily is involved in the metabolism of endogenous substrates such as steroid hormones and bile acids (13, 14). In addition, this subfamily also plays important roles in the metabolism of procarcinogens and pharmaceutical agents, including innumerable drugs, chemical carcinogens, mutagens, and other environmental contaminants (13, 14, 29). In humans, CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 mRNA has been demonstrated to be expressed in uterine endometrium by RT-PCR (18, 30), but there have been no reports on the CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 expression in endometrial cancer tissue. In this study, we found that the expression of CYP3A4/7 mRNA in endometrial cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in normal endometrium, and that CYP3A4/7 expression positively correlated with PXR expression. Moreover, PXR ligands, especially the endogenous steroids pregnenolone, estradiol, and P, activated PXR-mediated transcription and enhanced CYP3A4/7 expression in endometrial cancer cell lines. And EDCs strongly enhanced PXR-mediated transcription and CYP3A expression in HEC-1 cells, which express high PXR and low ER and PR, compared with those in Ishikawa cells, which express low PXR and high ER and PR. Taken together, these findings encouraged us to speculate that the PXR-CYP3A4/7 pathway might regulate the metabolism of steroid hormones under a local high steroid hormone condition and might play some roles in the intratumoral metabolism of steroid hormones, which may be involved in the growth and development of cancer tissue expressing low ER-{alpha}. In this study, we used a primer set that amplified both CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 as a same-size PCR product to show CYP3A expression by RT-PCR. Because both CYP3A subtypes have been demonstrated to play important roles in endometrium (18), and other metabolic enzymes including phase II enzymes and transporters as well as these CYP3A subtypes were reported to be regulated by PXR (6, 7, 11, 15), further analysis will be required to investigate roles of each CYP3A subtype and other metabolic enzymes regulated by PXR in endometrial cancer tissues. In addition, there were no reports that demonstrated the correlations between CYP3A and ER/PR in normal endometrium and endometrial cancer tissues. It is important to get additional data on the relationship between CYP3A and ER/PR in detail to understand the steroidogenesis in normal and neoplastic endometrium.

We recently demonstrated that the endocrine-disrupting chemicals phthalate and nonylphenol activated PXR-mediated transcription, perhaps through interaction with coactivators (26), and another group also showed that bisphenol A is a ligand for human PXR (27). PXR is thought to regulate CYP3A family genes, which play important roles in steroidogenesis (13, 14, 29), suggesting that there may be a novel pathway of endocrine-disrupting chemicals that affect endocrine functions. In this study, we also demonstrated that the EDCs bisphenol A and phthalate activated endogenous human PXR-mediated transcription and enhanced CYP3A4/7 expression in endometrial cancer cells, albeit weakly. This data suggested that EDCs might affect steroidogenesis in endometrial cancer tissue through the PXR-CYP3A pathway. Because some EDCs may have the potential to influence the risk for hormone-dependent breast cancer (31, 32), further analysis of the potential roles of the PXR-CYP3A pathway in EDC-induced carcinogenesis and the growth and development of endometrial cancer will be required. Moreover, PXR and CYP3A4 have been demonstrated to be involved in the acquisition of resistance to anticancer drugs. And paclitaxel, which is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent, has been demonstrated to activate PXR-mediated transcription and to enhance P-glycoprotein-mediated drug clearance (33). Also, intratumoral CYP3A4 mRNA levels might be useful as a predictor of response to docetaxel, which is another active antineoplastic drug, in breast cancer tissues (34). Therefore, because PXR-CYP3A4 pathway might be involved in drug clearance in endometrial cancer, the PXR-CYP3A expression in endometrial cancer tissues may cause resistance to anticancer agents, which results in affecting the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients. Additional clinical and basic data are required for this issue.

In summary, we examined the expression and potential role of the PXR-CYP3A pathway in endometrial cancer tissues. Tissues of endometrial cancer in which high expression of PXR was shown also showed significantly high expression of CYP3A4/7 and low expression of ER compared with levels of the substances in tissues in which low PXR expression was shown. As summarized in Table 2Go, HEC-1 cells, which express high PXR and low ER and PR, show a stronger transcriptional response of the PXR-CYP3A pathway to the PXR ligands, especially EDCs, than Ishikawa cells, which express low PXR and high ER and PR. These data suggest that the PXR-CYP3A pathway may play a role in the biology of endometrial cancer by affecting the intratumoral steroid metabolism and may be an alternative pathway for gonadal hormone and EDC effects specific to endometrial cancers expressing low ER{alpha}.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Summary from the data in endometrial cell lines

 


    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully thank Dr. Steven A. Kliewer for providing CYP3A4 reporter vector and Dr. M. Nishida for providing Ishikawa cells.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported, in part, by research grants (14042236, 14571562) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (to H.M.).

Abbreviations: CAT, Chloramphenicol acetyl transferase; CYP3A, cytochrome P-450 3A; DDT, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; E2, 17ß-estradiol; EDC, endocrine-disrupting chemical; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; ER, estrogen receptor; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; P, progesterone; PR, P receptor; PXR, pregnane X receptor.

Received February 7, 2003.

Accepted May 29, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lurain JR 2002 Uterine cancer. In: Berek JS, ed. Novak’s gynecology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams, Wilkins; 1143–1197
  2. Tseng L, Mazella J, Mann WJ, Chumus J 1982 Estrogen synthesis in normal and malignant human endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 55:1029–1031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yamaki J, Yamamoto T, Okada H 1985 Aromatization of androstenedione by normal and neoplastic endometrium of the uterus. J Steroid Biochem 22:63–66[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Yamamoto T, Kitawaki J, Urabe M, Honjo H, Tamura T, Noguchi T, Okada H, Sasaki H, Tada A, Terashima Y, Nakamura J, Yoshihama M 1993 Estrogen producibility of endometrium and endometrial cancer tissue; influence of aromatase on proliferation of endometrial cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 44:463–468[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Sasano H, Harada N 1998 Intratumoral aromatase in human breast, endometrial, and ovarian malignancies. Endocr Rev 19:593–607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kliewer SA, Moore JT, Wade L, Staudinger JL, Watson MA, Jones SA, Mckee DD, Oliver BB, Willson TM, Zetterstrom RH, Perlmann T, Lehmann JM 1998 An orphan nuclear receptor activated by pregnanes defines a novel steroid signaling pathway. Cell 92:73–82[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lehmann JM, Mckee DD, Watson MA, Willson TM, Moore JT, Kliewer SA 1998 The human orphan nuclear receptor PXR is activated by compounds that regulate CYP3A4 gene expression and cause drug interactions. J Clin Invest 102:1016–1023[Medline]
  8. Bertilsson G, Heidrich J, Svensson K, Asman M, Jendeberg L, Sydow- Backman M, Ohlsson R, Postlind H, Blomquist P, Berkenstam A 1998 Identification of a human nuclear receptor defines a new signaling pathway for CYP3A induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12208–12213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Zhang H, LeCulyse E, Liu L, Hu M, Matoney L, Zhu W, Yan B 1999 Rat pregnane X receptor: molecular cloning, tissue distribution, and xenobiotic regulation. Arch Biochem Biophys 368:14–22[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Blumberg B, Sabbagh Jr W, Juguilon H, Bolado Jr J, van Meter CM, Ong ES, Evans RM 1998 SXR, a novel steroid and xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptor. Genes Dev 12:3195–3205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pascussi JM, Jounaidi Y, Drocourt L, Domergue J, Balabaud C, Maurel P, Vilarem MJ 1999 Evidence for the presence of a functional pregnane X receptor response element in the CYP3A7 promoter gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 260:377–381[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Schuetz EG, Brimer C, Schuetz JD 1998 Environmental xenobiotics and the antihormones cyproterone acetate and spironolactone use the nuclear hormone pregnenolone X receptor to activate the CYP3A23 hormone response element. Mol Pharmacol 54:1113–1117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. De Wildt SN, Kearns GL, Leeder JS, van den Anker JN 1999 Cytochrome P450, ontogeny and drug disposition Clin Pharmacokinet 37:485–505
  14. Ketter TA, Flockhart DA, Post RM, Denicoff K, Pazzaglia PJ, Marangell LB, George MS, Callahan ASM 1995 The emerging role of cytochrome P450 3A in psychopharmacology. J Clin Psychopharmacol 15:387–398[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Kliewer SA, Goodwin B, Willson TM 2002 The nuclear pregnane X receptor: a key regulator of xenobiotic metabolism. Endocr Rev 23:687–702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Staudinger JL, Goodwin B, Jones SA, Hawkins-Brown D, MacKenzie KI, LaTour A, Liu Y, Klaassen CD, Brown KK, Reinhard J, Wilson TM, Koller BH, Kliewer SA 2001 The nuclear receptor PXR is a lithocholic acid sensor that protects against liver toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3369–3374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Masuyama H, Hiramatsu Y, Mizutani H, Inoshita H, Kudo T 2001 The expression of pregnane X receptor and its target gene, cytochrome P450 3A1, in perinatal mouse. Mol Cell Endocrinol 172:47–56[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Sarkar MA, Vadlamuri V, Ghosh S, Glover DD 2003 Expression and cyclic variability of CYP3A4 and CYP3A7 isoforms in human endometrium ands cervix during the menstrual cycle. Drug Metab Dispos 31:1–6[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Aasmundstad TA, Haugen OA, Johannesen E, Hoe AL, Kvinnsland S 1992 Oestrogen receptor analysis: correlation between enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical methods. J Clin Pathol 45:125–129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Stylianodou A, Papadimitriou CS 1992 Immunohistochemical demonstration of estrogen receptors on routine paraffin sections of breast carcinomas: a comparison with frozen sections and an enzyme immunoassay. Oncology 49:15–21[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Luqmani YA, Temmim L, Memon A, Ali MA, Parkar AH 1997 Steroid receptor measurement in breast cancers: comparison between ligand binding and enzyme-immunoassay in cytosolic and nuclear extracts. Int J Cancer 71 :526–38
  22. Masuyama H, MacDonald PN 1998 Proteasome-mediated degradation of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and a putative role for SUG1 interaction with the Af-2 domain of VDR. J Cell Biochem 71:429–440[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Juchau MR 1990 Substrate specificities and functions of the P450 cytochromes. Life Sci 47:2385–2394[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Quattrochi LC, Guzelian PS 2001 CYP3A regulation: from pharmacology to nuclear receptors. Drug Metab Dispos 29:615–622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Koch I, Weil R, Wolbold R, Brockmoller J, Hustert E, Burk O, Nuessler A, Neuhaus P, Eichelbaum M, Zanger U, Wojnowski L 2002 Interindividual variability and tissue-specificity in the expression of cytochrome P450 3A mRNA. Drug Metab Dispos 30:1108–14[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Masuyama H, Hiramatsu Y, Kunitomi M, Kudo T, MacDonald PN 2000 Endocrine disrupting chemicals phthalic acid and nonylphenol activate pregnane X receptor-mediated transcription. Mol Endocrinol 14:421–428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Takeshita A, Koibuchi N, Oka J, Taguchi M, Shishiba Y, Ozawa Y 2001 Bisphenol A, an environmental estrogen, activates the human orphan nuclear receptor, steroid and xenobiotic receptor-mediated transcription. Eur J Endocrinol 145:513–517[Abstract]
  28. Dotzlaw H, Leygue E, Watson P, Murphy LC 1999 The human orphan receptor PXR messenger RNA is expressed in both normal and neoplastic breast tissue. Clin Cancer Res 5:2103–2107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Quattrochi LC, Guzelian PS 2001 CYP3A regulation: from pharmacology to nuclear receptors. Drug Metab Dispos 29:615–622
  30. Hukkanen J, Mantyla M, Kangas L, Wirta P, Hakkola J, Paakki P, Evisalmi S, Pelkonen O, Raunio H 1998 Expression of cytochrome P450 genes encoding enzymes active in the metabolism of tamoxifen in human uterine endometrium. Pharmacol Toxicol 82:93–97[Medline]
  31. Wolff MS, Weston A 1997 Breast cancer risk and environmental exposures. Environ Health Perspect 105:891–896
  32. Wolff MS, Britton JA, Wilson VP 2003 Environmental risk factors for breast cancer among African-American women. Cancer 97:289–310[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Synold TW, Dussault I, Forman BM 2001 The orphan nuclear receptor SXR coordinately regulates drug metabolism and efflux. Nat Med 7:584–590[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Miyoshi Y, Ando A, Takamura Y, Taguchi T, Tamaki Y, Noguchi S 2002 Prediction of response to docetaxel by CYP3A4 mRNA expression in breast cancer tissues. Int J Cancer 97:129–132[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Gupta, M. Venkatesh, H. Wang, S. Kim, M. Sinz, G. L. Goldberg, K. Whitney, C. Longley, and S. Mani
Expanding the Roles for Pregnane X Receptor in Cancer: Proliferation and Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 14(17): 5332 - 5340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
R. Callaghan, E. Crowley, S. Potter, and I. D. Kerr
P-glycoprotein: So Many Ways to Turn It On
J. Clin. Pharmacol., March 1, 2008; 48(3): 365 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Chen, Y. Tang, M.-T. Wang, S. Zeng, and D. Nie
Human Pregnane X Receptor and Resistance to Chemotherapy in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10361 - 10367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
H. Masuyama, H. Nakatsukasa, N. Takamoto, and Y. Hiramatsu
Down-Regulation of Pregnane X Receptor Contributes to Cell Growth Inhibition and Apoptosis by Anticancer Agents in Endometrial Cancer Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2007; 72(4): 1045 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
H. K. Choi, J. W. Yang, S. H. Roh, C. Y. Han, and K. W. Kang
Induction of multidrug resistance associated protein 2 in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 293 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
A. Takeshita, K. Inagaki, J. Igarashi-Migitaka, Y. Ozawa, and N. Koibuchi
The endocrine disrupting chemical, diethylhexyl phthalate, activates MDR1 gene expression in human colon cancer LS174T cells.
J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2006; 190(3): 897 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Miki, T. Suzuki, K. Kitada, N. Yabuki, R. Shibuya, T. Moriya, T. Ishida, N. Ohuchi, B. Blumberg, and H. Sasano
Expression of the Steroid and Xenobiotic Receptor and Its Possible Target Gene, Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide-A, in Human Breast Carcinoma
Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 535 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
T. Suzuki, Y. Miki, Y. Nakamura, T. Moriya, K. Ito, N. Ohuchi, and H. Sasano
Sex steroid-producing enzymes in human breast cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 701 - 720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Orans, D. G. Teotico, and M. R. Redinbo
The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor Pregnane X Receptor: Recent Insights and New Challenges
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 19(12): 2891 - 2900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
H. Masuyama, N. Suwaki, Y. Tateishi, H. Nakatsukasa, T. Segawa, and Y. Hiramatsu
The Pregnane X Receptor Regulates Gene Expression in a Ligand- and Promoter- Selective Fashion
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 19(5): 1170 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masuyama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masuyama, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals