help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nørrelund, H.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nørrelund, H.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, N.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 9 4371-4378
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

The Decisive Role of Free Fatty Acids for Protein Conservation during Fasting in Humans with and without Growth Hormone

Helene Nørrelund, K. Sreekumaran Nair, Steen Nielsen, Jan Frystyk, Per Ivarsen, Jens Otto Lunde Jørgensen, Jens Sandahl Christiansen and Niels Møller

Medical Department M (Endocrinology and Diabetes) (H.N., S.N., J.O.L.J., J.S.C.), Institute of Experimental Clinical Research (J.F., N.M.), Department of Nephrology (P.I.), Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; and Endocrinology Division, Mayo Clinic (K.S.N.), Rochester, Minnesota 55905

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Helene Nørrelund, Medical Department M, Aarhus Kommunehospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: helenenorrelund{at}dadlnet.dk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
During fasting, a lack of GH increases protein loss by close to 50%, but the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. The present study tests the hypothesis that the anabolic actions of GH depend on mobilization of lipids. Seven normal subjects were examined on four occasions during a 37-h fast with infusion of somatostatin, insulin, and glucagon for the final 15 h: 1) with GH replacement, 2) with GH replacement and antilipolysis with acipimox, 3) without GH and with antilipolysis, and 4) with GH replacement, antilipolysis, and infusion of intralipid. Urinary urea excretion, serum urea concentrations, and muscle protein breakdown (assessed by labeled phenylalanine) increased by almost 50% during fasting with suppression of lipolysis. Addition of GH during fasting with antilipolysis did not influence indexes of protein degradation, whereas restoration of high FFA levels regenerated proportionally low concentrations of urea and decreased whole body protein degradation (phenylalanine to tyrosine conversion) by 10–15%, but failed to affect muscle protein metabolism. Thus, the present data provide strong evidence that FFA are important protein-sparing agents during fasting. The finding that inhibition of lipolysis eliminates the ability of GH to restrict fasting protein loss indicates that stimulation of lipolysis is the principal protein-conserving mechanism of GH.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
DESPITE THE USE of modern technologies within agriculture and medicine, fasting-related states of distress (hunger, malnutrition, and wasting syndromes) continue to constitute a major health problem worldwide. In this context GH may play an important protein-conserving role.

The impact of GH on protein metabolism is complex. Previous studies have shown that GH postabsorptively primarily increases protein synthesis at the whole body level (1), and there is evidence that acute exposure to high levels of GH may directly increase muscle protein synthesis (2). It has also been reported that 6 wk of GH treatment to malnourished hemodialysis patients resulted in stimulation of muscle protein synthesis without any effect on muscle protein degradation (3). During fasting in normal subjects we have recently reported that suppression of GH leads to a 50% increase in urea-nitrogen excretion together with an increased net release and an increased appearance rate of phenylalanine across the forearm (4). In GH-deficient adults (GHDA), hyposomatotropinemia during fasting was associated with increased whole body protein loss, accounted for by a net reduction in protein synthesis (5). Furthermore, GH substitution for 8 wk in GHDA revealed increased net protein synthesis postabsorptively and unaltered total protein turnover (6), in agreement with dose-response studies (7).

The mechanism by which GH affects protein metabolism remains uncertain, and collectively the metabolic effects are complex, involving increased lipolysis, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and an increase in IGF-I activity (8, 9, 10, 11). Previous studies have suggested that elevated concentrations of free fatty acids (FFA) and ketone bodies in the circulation may have an anabolic effect on protein metabolism (12, 13, 14). Postabsorptively, pharmacological suppression of FFA is accompanied by augmented whole body protein degradation (15). The degree to which release of lipids contributes to the anabolic actions of GH during fasting has not been specifically investigated previously, although the lipolytic responsiveness to GH may be increased during energy restriction (16). We have previously shown that GH increases circulating lipid intermediates and has important nitrogen-conserving effects during short-term fasting (4). The present study was undertaken to assess the acute effects of FFA and GH, independently of its lipolytic actions, on protein metabolism. For this purpose we studied seven normal subjects on four occasions after a 37-h fast with concomitant determination of urea excretion and whole body and regional muscle fluxes of phenylalanine and tyrosine. Circulating levels of GH and FFA were clamped by infusion of somatostatin and administration of acipimox (a nicotinic acid analog) together with GH and triglycerides/heparin.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Seven healthy male subjects (mean age, 23 ± 1 yr; body mass index, 24 ± 1 kg/m2) were examined on four occasions during a 37-h fast: 1) with GH replacement (+GH, -acipimox), 2) with GH replacement and inhibition of lipolysis (+GH, +acipimox), 3) without GH and with inhibition of lipolysis (-GH, +acipimox), and 4) with GH replacement, inhibition of lipolysis, and infusion of intralipid (10%, 1 ml/min) and heparin (90 mU/kg·min; +GH, +acipimox, +intralipid; Fig. 1Go). To control hormone concentrations, somatostatin, insulin, and glucagon were infused for the last 15 h (i.e. after 22 h of fasting) on all occasions, and GH (no. 1, 2, and 4) and acipimox (no. 2–4) were added during the last 15 h as outlined below. Somatostatin (200 µg/h) was infused together with insulin [100 IU/ml Actrapid, Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark; infusion rate adjusted to maintain plasma glucose levels between 3–5 mmol/liter (0.1–0.05 mU/kg·min)] and glucagon [1 ng/ml GlucaGen, Novo Nordisk (1.0–1.5 ng/kg·min)]. All treatment limbs were identical in terms of hormone replacement doses, except for GH [12 IU/ml Norditropin, Novo Nordisk; 4.5 IU partly as bolus injections (0.6 IU every 4 h), partly as continuous infusion (0.15 IU/h)] and acipimox (Olbetam; 250 mg, orally, every 4 h). To avoid hypoglycemia (plasma glucose concentration <3 mmol/liter) during fasting with GH suppression and antilipolysis (-GH, +acipimox), all participants temporarily received glucose iv (0.2 mg/kg·min for a period of 0.5–1.5 h the night before the study); exactly the same amount of glucose was given in precisely the same manner in all experiments. As potential hypoglycemia was anticipated during GH suppression, the -GH, +acipimox experiment was always conducted before the rest to allow for control of exogenous glucose. The subjects were blinded to this procedure. Otherwise the experiments were random, with at least 6 wk elapsing between each experiment. During the last 3 h, substrate metabolism was investigated. No participants received glucose during these last 3 h, as glucose infusion was tapered at least 2 h before investigations of substrate metabolism were started. Before the study, subjects were on a weight-maintaining diet for at least 3 months. All subjects gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the regional ethics committee and conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. The experimental design (see text for details).

 
Measurements

All studies were performed with participants in the supine position. At 0800 h, priming doses of L-[15N]phenylalanine (0.7 mg/kg), L-[2H4]tyrosine (0.5 mg/kg), and L-[15N]tyrosine (0.3 mg/kg; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., Andover, MA) were given to reach an early plateau. A continuous infusion of L-[15N]phenylalanine (0.7 mg/kg·h) and L-[2H4]tyrosine (0.5 mg/kg/h) was started and maintained for 3 h. The chemical, isotopic, and optical purities of the isotopes were tested before use. Solutions were prepared under sterile precautions and were shown to be free of bacteria and pyrogens. L-[15N]Phenylalanine, L-[2H4]tyrosine, and L-[15N]tyrosine were measured as their t-butyldimethylsilyl ether derivatives under electron ionization conditions (17). In addition, concentrations of phenylalanine and tyrosine were measured by mass spectrometry using L-[2H8]phenylalanine and L-[13C6]tyrosine, respectively, as internal standards (17). Plasma concentrations of amino acids were determined by an HPLC system (Bio-Tek Kontron, series 525 and 465, fluorescence detector SFM25, Kontron Instruments, Milan, Italy) with precolumn O-phthalaldehyde derivatization using a slight modification of the method described by Jones and Gilligan (18). The plasma glucose level was measured in duplicate immediately after sampling on a glucose analyzer (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA). Whole blood glycerol, lactate and 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-OH-butyrate) were analyzed by autofluorimetric enzymatic methods (19). Levels of serum FFA were determined using a commercial kit (Wako Chemicals, Neuss, Germany). A double monoclonal immunofluorometric assay (Delfia, Wallac, Finland) was used to measure serum GH, whereas plasma glucagon and IGF-I levels were measured by in-house assays (20, 21). Insulin and C peptide were determined by commercial immunological kits (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark; Immunoclear, Stillwater, MN). Catecholamines were measured by liquid chromatography (22). Urinary urea excretion was determined by an indophenol method, and serum urea by a commercial kit (Cobasintegra, Roche, Hvidovre, Denmark). Cortisol was measured using an automated chemiluminescence system (Chiron Diagnostics, Fernwald, Germany). Urea accumulation was determined assuming immediate dispersion of urea from the blood to total body water (TBW), which was estimated by the formula (23): TBW = 0.3625 x BW + 0.2239 x BH - 0.1387 x Y - 14.47, where Y is age in years, BW is body weight in kilograms, and BH is body height in centimeters. The urea-nitrogen synthesis rate (UNSR) was determined as urinary excretion of urea (E) corrected for accumulation (A) of urea in TBW and for hydrolysis in gut (L) (24): UNSR = (E + A)/(1 - L). L was estimated to be 0.14.

Forearm method

Catheters for measurements of forearm arteriovenous substrate balances were placed as previously described (4). In brief, one catheter was placed retrogradely in a deep antecubital vein, and one catheter was inserted retrogradely in a heated contralateral dorsal vein. Criteria for correct positioning were oxygen saturations less than 70% and more than 91%, respectively. A third catheter was placed antegradely in an antecubital vein of the heated hand for infusions. Before each deep venous sample, total ipsilateral forearm blood flow was determined by means of venous occlusion plethysmography. Hand blood flow was interrupted by a wrist cuff inflated to a pressure of 250 mm Hg immediately before each blood flow determination and 1 min before each deep venous sample.

Phenylalanine kinetics

For measurements of whole body phenylalanine kinetics, the equations of Thompson et al. (25) were used, and for regional phenylalanine kinetics, previously described equations (17) were used. Phenylalanine flux (Qp) and tyrosine flux (Qt) were calculated as follows: Qflux = I[(Ei/Ep) - 1], where I is the rate of tracer infusion (micromoles per kilogram per hour), and Ei and Ep are enrichment of the tracer infused and plasma enrichment of the tracer at isotopic plateau, respectively.

The rate of phenylalanine conversion to tyrosine (Ipt) was calculated as follows: Ipt = Qt x ([15N]Tyrei/[15N]pheei) x (Qp/(Ip+Qp)), where [15N]Tyrei and [15N]Pheei are the isotopic enrichments of the respective tracers in plasma, and Ip is the infusion rate of [15N]phenylalanine micromoles per kilogram per hour).

Phenylalanine incorporation into protein is calculated by subtracting Ipt from Qp, because phenylalanine is irreversibly lost either by conversion into tyrosine or by incorporation into protein.

In the forearm study phenylalanine balance (PheBal) was calculated as follows: PheBal = (PheA - PheV) x F, where PheA and PheV are phenylalanine concentrations in arteries and veins, and F is blood flow.

Regional protein breakdown, represented by the phenylalanine rate of appearance (RaPhe), was calculated as follows (26): RaPhe = PheA [(PheEA/PheEV) - 1] x F, where PheEA and PheEV represent phenylalanine isotopic enrichment in arteries and veins.

The local rate of disappearance was calculated as: Rd Phe = Ra Phe + Phe Bal.

Microdialysis

A microdialysis catheter (CMA 60, CMA, Stockholm, Sweden) was placed in the abdominal sc adipose tissue after anesthetization of the skin with 0.05 ml lidocaine at the site of perforation of the skin. The microdialysis catheter used has a molecular cut-off of 20 kDa. Immediately after placement, perfusion of the catheters with physiological perfusion fluid (perfusion fluid T1, CMA; Na+, 147 mmol/liter; K+, 4 mmol/liter; Ca2+, 2.3 mmol/liter; Cl-, 156 mmol/liter; pH 6; osmolality, 290 mosmol/kg) at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min with the use of a portable pump (CMA 106, CMA) was accomplished. At this flow rate, the rate of recovery with the microdialysis catheter is almost 100% (27). The microdialysis catheter was placed at 0 min (34 h of fasting; 0800 h). After 1 h of calibration with perfusion of the microdialysis catheter, allowing local edema and hemorrhage to subside, sampling started at 60 min and continued every 60 min. Urea and glycerol in the dialysate were measured by an automated spectrophotometric kinetic enzymatic analyzer (CMA 600, CMA).

Statistics

Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test for normal distribution. Statistical comparisons between the study periods (1) +GH, -acipimox, 2) +GH, +acipimox, 3) -GH, +acipimox, and 4) +GH, +acipimox, +intralipid) were assessed by a two-way ANOVA. If this test was positive, post hoc comparison was performed by means of a paired t test (to test: the effect of lipolysis (1 vs. 2), the effect of GH (2 vs. 3), and the effect of intralipid (2 vs. 4) or Wilcoxon test for nonparametric data. For time series, the area under the curve was calculated by the trapezoidal method, and comparisons were made by ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Unless specified otherwise, data referred to below were obtained with arterialized blood based on triplicate measurements during the last 30 min of the study periods.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Circulating hormones and metabolites

Inhibition of lipolysis led to an 80% increase in GH concentration despite somatostatin infusion (Table 1Go). Total IGF-I decreased, and the counterregulatory hormones cortisol and epinephrine increased. Addition of GH during inhibition of lipolysis was associated with an increase in glucagon and a decrease in norepinephrine. Addition of intralipid lowered concentrations of GH, cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Serum concentration (means ± SE) of hormones

 
Acipimox administration lowered circulating concentrations of lipid intermediates (FFA and glycerol; Table 2Go) and halved the concentration of 3-OH-butyrate. FFA and glycerol tended to escape the action of the drug after 12 h, as an increase in circulating concentrations of FFA and glycerol was found (most markedly in the presence of GH) and a significant increase in interstitial glycerol was seen during antilipolysis. Glucose was 20% decreased by inhibition of lipolysis, whereas lactate was increased. Addition of GH during antilipolysis was associated with a significant increase in FFA, glycerol, glucose, and interstitial glycerol, whereas lactate decreased. Addition of intralipid caused an increase in FFA, glycerol, and glucose, whereas 3-OH-butyrate decreased.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Circulating levels of metabolites (means ± SE)

 
Protein metabolism

Whole body. Urinary urea excretion (occasion 1, 521 ± 50 mmol/24 h; occasion 2, 634 ± 48 mmol/24 h; occasion 3, 691 ± 55 mmol/24 h; occasion 4, 589 ± 54 mmol/24 h; P < 0.05) and serum urea (occasion 1, 5.2 ± 0.3 mmol/liter; occasion 2, 7.3 ± 0.3 mmol/liter; occasion 3, 7.6 ± 0.3 mmol/liter; occasion 4, 5.2 ± 0.2 mmol/liter; P < 0.01) were significantly increased during fasting with suppression of lipolysis, and UNSR was increased as well (occasion 1, 22.2 ± 2.1 mmol/h; occasion 2, 32.1 ± 3.7 mmol/h; occasion 3, 30.7 ± 3.0 mmol/h; occasion 4, 24.8 ± 1.9 mmol/h; P < 0.05; Fig. 2Go). Interstitial urea was about 50% increased during fasting with antilipolysis, whereas addition of intralipid was associated with a proportionally low interstitial urea concentration (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Serum urea, UNSR, and interstitial urea (mean ± SE). *, P < 0.05 -acipimox vs. +acipimox (occasion 1 vs. occasion 2). **, P < 0.01 -acipimox vs. +acipimox (occasion 1 vs. occasion 2). ##, P < 0.01 -intralipid vs. +intralipid (occasion 2 vs. occasion 4).

 
Phenylalanine flux, representing whole body protein turnover, did not differ between the groups (Table 3Go). Tyrosine flux was significantly decreased during fasting with infusion of intralipid. Phenylalanine to tyrosine degradation was also decreased during fasting with addition of intralipid, and addition of GH during antilipolysis did not affect phenylalanine hydroxylation. No difference in whole body protein synthesis (phenylalanine disposal not accounted for by phenylalanine conversion to tyrosine) was found between the groups. GH suppression or inhibition of lipolysis did not affect phenylalanine degradation in relation to phenylalanine concentration (clearance rate: occasion 1, 115 ± 29 ml/min; occasion 2, 101 ± 11 ml/min; occasion 3, 102 ± 19 ml/min; occasion 4, 96 ± 10 ml/min; P = 0.18). Plasma concentrations of amino acids are shown in Table 4Go. Inhibition of lipolysis was associated with a significant increase in branched chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, and valine). Overall the glucogenic amino acids did not differ, although alanine decreased when GH was added during antilipolysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Whole body and forearm protein dynamics (means ± SE)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Plasma concentrations of amino acids (means ± SE)

 
Forearm. Forearm blood flow, as assessed by plethysmography, was not affected by administration of either GH or acipimox. Consequently, forearm exchange of metabolites is expressed as simple arteriovenous differences in plasma concentrations of metabolites. Arterial concentration of phenylalanine, as measured by mass spectrometry, tended to be increased during antilipolysis (phenylalanine: occasion 1, 61 ± 3 µmol/liter; occasion 2, 75 ± 3 µmol/liter; occasion 3, 82 ± 8 µmol/liter; occasion 4, 72 ± 3 µmol/liter; P = 0.07). Forearm muscle exhibited a net release of phenylalanine, and the negative phenylalanine balance was higher during fasting with inhibition of lipolysis (Table 3Go). Phenylalanine balance was unaffected by the addition of GH during inhibition of lipolysis. Muscle protein breakdown, represented by the phenylalanine rate of appearance, was highest during fasting with inhibition of lipolysis and was unaffected by the addition of GH (Table 3Go). The groups did not differ in relation to the incorporation of phenylalanine into muscle. Total amino acid balance was significantly increased during antilipolysis, and the addition of GH did not affect muscle protein loss.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study we sought to define mechanisms participating in the protein-conserving actions of GH during fasting and, more specifically, to test the hypothesis that stimulation of lipolysis may be instrumental for such actions. This concept was based on previous studies in our laboratory showing that GH increases circulating lipid intermediates and that the lack of GH during short-term fasting in healthy volunteers increases urea-nitrogen loss by 50% (4, 5). The main findings of our study are that inhibition of lipolysis increases urea-nitrogen production and muscle protein breakdown (assessed by labeled phenylalanine) by nearly 50% and neutralizes the ability of GH to reduce ureagenesis and to restrict muscle protein breakdown, and restoration of high FFA levels (intralipid infusion) reestablishes proportional concentrations of urea and decreases whole body phenylalanine degradation by 10–15%, but fails to decrease muscle protein breakdown.

When infusing intralipid we made some intriguing observations. Although we achieved FFA concentrations of 2.8 mmol/liter, i.e. in the supraphysiological range, 3-OH-butyrate concentrations remained suppressed. Some studies have suggested a rise in ketone body concentrations after intralipid infusion in the basal state (28, 29, 30), whereas others have failed to observe any rise (31). This obviously indicates that ketogenesis during fasting is regulated by factors others than FFA in the systemic circulation (32), and our failure to observe any effect on muscle amino acid metabolism during intralipid infusion is compatible with the idea that ketone bodies are instrumental in suppressing protein breakdown and amino acid release from muscle, as suggested by a number of studies (14, 31, 33).

Many counterregulatory hormones were significantly increased when lipolysis was inhibited during fasting, to some extent probably secondary to feedback mechanisms from the reduced levels of FFA and glucose. This increase may have contributed to the effects on protein metabolism. In humans, pharmacological doses of glucocorticosteroids, sufficient to increase plasma cortisol concentrations to the high physiological range, increase proteolysis (1, 34). In the present study a modest increase in cortisol was observed. Although we saw an increase in circulating catecholamine concentrations, there is, to our knowledge, no evidence that catecholamines stimulate protein breakdown.

Despite the fact that glucagon was administered in exactly the same manner in all four situations, plasma levels were paradoxically decreased during fasting with suppression of GH and inhibition of lipolysis. Little is known about the mechanisms responsible for glucagon clearance in the body, but the circulating serine protease dipeptidyl peptidase IV seems to be a primary enzyme involved in the degradation and inactivation of glucagon (35); the regulation of this peptide, however, remains to be clarified. Protein wasting and reduced amino acid concentrations are common findings in glucagonoma patients (36, 37), and glucagon has distinct protein catabolic effects (38, 39).

Antilipolysis was induced by administration of the nicotinic acid derivative acipimox, which is known to exert its antilipolytic effect by lowering the intracellular level of cAMP and thereby inhibiting the activity of the hormone-sensitive lipase (40). Any possible intrinsic effect of acipimox on protein metabolism, however, has not been verified. In our study acipimox exerted a marked impact on circulating FFA concentrations, and net protein degradation was significantly increased, as determined by UNSR and phenylalanine hydroxylation. Despite the increase in UNSR, whole body amino acid degradation (as measured by phenylalanine conversion to tyrosine) did not increase significantly. This could relate either to a type II error or to the very distinct metabolism of phenylalanine and tyrosine. Hydroxylation of phenylalanine to tyrosine occurs in liver and kidney catalyzed by phenylalanine hydroxylase, and tyrosine is the precursor for thyroid hormone and catecholamine synthesis. If any of these processes changes differentially from overall amino acid metabolism, the resulting estimate of protein degradation may be misleading (41). The fact that intralipid infusion, which was used to recreate high FFA concentrations, led to a normalization of serum urea, interstitial urea, and protein degradation is in line with the idea that acipimox acts on protein metabolism exclusively by lowering FFA levels. Our failure to detect a significant drop in UNSR with intralipid infusion (P = 0.13) could relate to inaccuracies related to the collection of urine.

Previous studies assessing the impact of GH on protein kinetics, which have been performed postabsorptively, have generally shown that GH primarily increases protein synthesis at the whole body level when administered systemically (1, 3, 6), and there is evidence that GH may increase muscle protein synthesis when directly infused into the forearm (2). Some studies have failed to detect any effect of GH on muscle protein synthesis (26, 42), whereas one study showed that protein synthesis is stimulated by daily GH substitution dose of 3.3 µg/kg·d, whereas a GH substitution dose of 2 µg/kg·d did not change protein turnover (7). During fasting, GH has been shown to inhibit muscle protein breakdown in healthy subjects (4), whereas continuation of GH substitution during fasting in GHDA conserves nitrogen through stimulation of protein synthesis (5). The apparent complexity of the impact of GH on protein metabolism is perhaps predictable when considering the diverse metabolic actions of GH, including stimulation of lipolysis and IGF-I activity, hyperinsulinemia, and, at times, hyperglycemia. In addition, many studies have employed exposure to very high levels of GH, rendering results difficult to interpret in a physiological context. On the whole, it appears that the effects of GH on protein metabolism include both stimulation of protein synthesis and inhibition of breakdown depending on the nature of GH administration, which tissues are being examined, and the physiological conditions of the subjects studied.

Several lines of evidence support a protein-sparing effect of lipids. Infusion of ketone bodies has been shown to decrease circulating levels of alanine (13), leucine oxidation, and leucine incorporation in protein (12). Lowering of FFA concentrations in healthy subjects by the administration of acipimox increased total urea-nitrogen production (43), and urea excretion during fasting (44), whereas elevation of circulating levels by infusion of intralipid and heparin in humans was shown to have a hypoaminoacidemic action in man (45). The present study suggests that lowering circulating levels of FFA by pharmacological antilipolysis exerts important effects on net whole body protein degradation in terms of a 50% increase in urea-nitrogen synthesis and muscle protein breakdown. Addition of GH during fasting with antilipolysis did not influence indexes of protein degradation, whereas infusion of intralipid restored normal preexisting conditions at the whole body level. In the forearm study, however, neither the negative phenylalanine balance nor the amino acid balance was restored by infusion of intralipid, as discussed above.

Studies of the effect of IGF-I on protein metabolism have yielded conflicting results, and the mechanism by which IGF-I affects protein turnover is still a matter of controversy. It has been shown that iv infusion of IGF-I inhibits proteolysis (46, 47), whereas IGF-I during amino acid infusion may stimulate protein synthesis (48). Total IGF-I was significantly decreased during fasting with antilipolysis and was unaffected by the addition of GH, indicating either that acipimox may have direct effects on IGF-I or that substrate availability may be important for IGF-I generation.

A number of studies have shown that insulin profoundly affects protein metabolism, primarily by inhibiting proteolysis (49, 50). In the present study insulin levels were comparable throughout all study periods, and it is unlikely that differences in insulin influenced our observations.

It is possible that hyperglycemia per se may affect protein metabolism. In our study high levels of FFA were associated with modest hyperglycemia, whereas forearm glucose uptake did not differ among the four settings (data not given). Previous studies have implied that the administration of small amounts of glucose during fasting (51) and hyperglycemia (52) may be protein sparing. A more recent study, however, suggests that the decrease in whole body proteolysis during the infusion of insulin and glucose is mediated by the plasma insulin concentration and not the ambient glucose concentration or the rate of glucose utilization (53).

In summary, the present study gives strong evidence that FFA are important protein-retaining modulators during fasting. Lowering of circulating FFA concentrations leads to a 50% increase in urea-nitrogen production and both net and total phenylalanine release from the forearm and restoration of high FFA concentrations with exogenous lipid infusion normalizes these aberations at the whole body level and reduces phenylalanine to tyrosine conversion. The presence of high circulating concentrations of ketone bodies seems to be a prerequisite for FFA to specifically decrease muscle protein breakdown and amino acid release. The finding that inhibition of lipolysis blocks the ability of GH to restrict protein loss clearly suggests that stimulation of lipolysis is instrumental to the protein-conserving effects of GH under fasting conditions.


    Acknowledgments
 
GH preparations were generously supplied by Novo Nordisk (Copenhagen, Denmark). Dr. K. G. M. M. Alberti (University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) and Dr. Frederik Andreasen (University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark) kindly provided the measurements of glycerol, 3-OH-butyrate, lactate, and catecholamines. We are grateful to Lone Svendsen and Iben Sørensen for excellent technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Novo Nordisk Fonden, Aage and Johanne Louis-Hansens Fond, the Danish Research Council, Grant 9600822 (Novo Nordisk Center for Research in Growth and Regeneration, Aarhus University), and NIH Grants RO1-DK-41973 and RR-00585.

Abbreviations: FFA, Free fatty acids; GHDA, GH-deficient adults; 3-OH-butyrate, 3-hydroxybutyrate; TBW, total body water; UNSR, urea-nitrogen synthesis rate.

Received February 19, 2003.

Accepted May 29, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Horber FF, Haymond MW 1990 Human growth hormone prevents the protein catabolic side effects of prednisone in humans. J Clin Invest 86:265–272
  2. Fryburg DA, Gelfand RA, Barrett EJ 1991 Growth hormone acutely stimulates forearm muscle protein synthesis in normal humans. Am J Physiol 260:E499–E504
  3. Garibotto G, Barreca A, Russo R, Sofia A, Araghi P, Cesarone A, Malaspina M, Fiorini F, Minuto F, Tizianello A 1997 Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on muscle protein turnover in malnourished hemodialysis patients. J Clin Invest 99:97–105[Medline]
  4. Norrelund H, Nair KS, Jorgensen JO, Christiansen JS, Moller N 2001 The protein-retaining effects of growth hormone during fasting involve inhibition of muscle-protein breakdown. Diabetes 50:96–104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Norrelund H, Moller N, Nair KS, Christiansen JS, Jorgensen JO 2001 Continuation of growth hormone (GH) substitution during fasting in GH-deficient patients decreases urea excretion and conserves protein synthesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3120–3129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Russell-Jones DL, Weissberger AJ, Bowes SB, Kelly JM, Thomason M, Umpleby AM, Jones RH, Sonksen PH 1993 The effects of growth hormone on protein metabolism in adult growth hormone deficient patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 38:427–431[Medline]
  7. Lucidi P, Lauteri M, Laureti S, Celleno R, Santoni S, Volpi E, Angeletti G, Santeusanio F, De Feo P 1998 A dose-response study of growth hormone (GH) replacement on whole body protein and lipid kinetics in GH-deficient adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:353–357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bak JF, Moller N, Schmitz O 1991 Effects of growth hormone on fuel utilization and muscle glycogen synthase activity in normal humans. Am J Physiol 260:E736–E742
  9. Fowelin J, Attvall S, von Schenck H, Smith U, Lager I 1991 Characterization of the insulin-antagonistic effect of growth hormone in man. Diabetologia 34:500–506[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Copeland KC, Underwood LE, Van Wyk JJ 1980 Induction of immunoreactive somatomedin-C in human serum by growth hormone: dose response relationships, effect on chromatographic profiles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50:690–697[Medline]
  11. Tai TY, Pek S 1976 Direct stimulation by growth hormone of glucagons and insulin release from isolated rat pancreas. Endocrinology 99:669–677[Abstract]
  12. Nair KS, Welle SL, Halliday D, Campbell RG 1988 Effect of ß-hydroxybutyrate on whole-body leucine kinetics and fractional mixed skeletal muscle protein synthesis in humans. J Clin Invest 82:198–205
  13. Sherwin RS, Hendler RG, Felig P 1975 Effect of ketone infusions on amino acid and nitrogen metabolism in man. J Clin Invest 55:1382–1390
  14. Tessari P, Nissen SL, Miles JM, Haymond MW 1986 Inverse relationship of leucine flux and oxidation to free fatty acid availability in vivo. J Clin Invest 77:575–581
  15. Nielsen S, Jørgensen JOL, Hartmund T, Nørrelund H, Nair KS, Christiansen JS, Møller N 2002 Effects of lowering circulating free fatty acid levels on protein metabolism in adult growth hormone deficient patients. GH and IGF Res 12:425–433
  16. Moller N, Porksen N, Ovesen P, Alberti KGMM 1993 Evidence for increased sensitivity of fuel mobilization to growth hormone during short-term fasting in humans. Horm Metab Res 25:175–179[Medline]
  17. Nair KS, Ford GC, Ekberg K, Fernqvist-Forbes E, Wahren J 1995 Protein dynamics in whole body and in splanchnic and leg tissues in type I diabetic patients. J Clin Invest 95:2926–2937
  18. Jones B, Gilligan J 1983 Amino acid analysis by O-pthaldehyde precolumn derivitization and reversed phase HPLC. Am Biotechnol Lab 12:45–51
  19. Harrison J, Hodson AW, Skillen AW, Stappenbeck R, Aigus L, Alberti KGMM 1988 Blood glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glycerol, 3-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate measurements in man using a centrifugal analyser with a fluorimetric attachment. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 26:141–146[Medline]
  20. Orskov H, Thomsen HG, Yde H 1968 Wick chromatography for rapid and reliable immunoassay of insulin, glucagon and growth hormone. Nature 219:193–195[Medline]
  21. Frystyk J, Dinesen B, Orskov H 1995 Non-competitive time-resolved immunofluorometric assays for determination of human insulin-like growth factor I and II. Growth Regul 5:169–176[Medline]
  22. Erikson BM, Persson AB 1982 Determination of catecholamines in rat heart tissue and plasma samples by liquid chromatography. J Chrom Biomed Appl 228:143–154[CrossRef]
  23. Dossing M, Poulsen HE, Andreasen PB, Tygstrup N 1982 A simple method for determination of antipyrine clearance 80. Clin Pharmacol Ther 32:392–396[Medline]
  24. Walser M, Bodenlos LJ 1959 Urea metabolism in man. J Clin Invest 38:1617–1626
  25. Thompson GN, Pacy PJ, Merritt H, Ford GC, Read MA, Cheng KN, Halliday D 1989 Rapid measurement of whole body and forearm protein turnover using a [2H5]phenylalanine model. Am J Physiol 256:E631–E639
  26. Copeland KC, Nair KS 1994 Acute growth hormone effects on amino acid and lipid metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1040–1047[Abstract]
  27. Moberg E, Hagstrom-Toft E, Arner P, Bolinder J 1997 Protracted glucose fall in subcutaneous adipose tissue and skeletal muscle compared with blood during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia 40:1320–1326[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Avogaro A, Doria A, Gnudi L, Carraro A, Duner E, Brocco E, Tiengo A, Crepaldi G, Bier DM, Nosadini R 1992 Forearm ketone body metabolism in normal and in insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Am J Physiol 263:E261–E267
  29. Boden G, Chen X 1999 Effects of fatty acids and ketone bodies on basal insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 48:577–583[Abstract]
  30. Jeejeebhoy KN, Anderson GH, Nakhooda AF, Greenberg GR, Sanderson I, Marliss EB 1976 Metabolic studies in total parenteral nutrition with lipid in man; comparison with glucose. J Clin Invest 57:125–136
  31. Walker M, Shmueli E, Daley SE, Cooper BG, Alberti KG 1993 Do nonesterified fatty acids regulate skeletal muscle protein turnover in humans? Am J Physiol 265:E357–E361
  32. Miles JM, Haymond MW, Gerich JE 1982 Effects of free fatty acids, insulin, glucagon and adrenaline on ketone body production in humans. Ciba Found Symp 87:192–213[Medline]
  33. Thompson JR, Wu G 1991 The effect of ketone bodies on nitrogen metabolism in skeletal muscle. Comp Biochem Physiol B 100:209–216[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Simmons PS, Miles JM, Gerich JE, Haymond MW 1984 Increased proteolysis. An effect of increases in plasma cortisol within the physiologic range. J Clin Invest 73:412–420
  35. Pospisilik JA, Hinke SA, Pederson RA, Hoffmann T, Rosche F, Schlenzig D, Glund K, Heiser U, McIntosh CH, Demuth H 2001 Metabolism of glucagon by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26). Regul Pept 96:133–141[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Barazzoni R, Zanetti M, Tiengo A, Tessari P 1999 Protein metabolism in glucagonoma. Diabetologia 42:326–329[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Bernstein M, Jahoor F, Townsend CM Jr., Klein S 2001 Amino acid, glucose, and lipid kinetics after palliative resection in a patient with glucagonoma syndrome. Metabolism 50:720–722[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Charlton MR, Adey DB, Nair KS 1996 Evidence for a catabolic role of glucagon during an amino acid load. J Clin Invest 98:90–99[Medline]
  39. Vilstrup H, Hansen BA, Almdal TP 1990 Glucagon increases hepatic efficacy for urea synthesis. J Hepatol 10:46–50[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Christie AW, McCormick DK, Emmison N, Kraemer FB, Alberti KG, Yeaman SJ 1996 Mechanism of anti-lipolytic action of acipimox in isolated rat adipocytes. Diabetologia 39:45–53[Medline]
  41. Moller N, Albright R, Andrews J, Nair KS 2000 Kidney is an important site for phenylalanine-to-tyrosine conversion in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1242–46[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Yarasheski KE, Campbell JA, Smith K, Rennie MJ, Holloszy JO, Bier DM 1992 Effect of growth hormone and resistance exercise on muscle growth in young men. Am J Physiol 262:E261–E267
  43. Fery F, Plat L, Baleriaux M, Balasse EO 1997 Inhibition of lipolysis stimulates whole body glucose production and disposal in normal postabsorptive subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:825–830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Fery F, Plat L, Melot C, Balasse EO 1996 Role of fat-derived substrates in the regulation of gluconeogenesis during fasting. Am J Physiol 270:E822–E830
  45. Ferrannini E, Barrett EJ, Bevilacqua S, Jacob R, Walesky M, Sherwin RS, DeFronzo RA 1986 Effect of free fatty acids on blood amino acid levels in human. Am J Physiol 250:E686–E694
  46. Laager R, Ninnis R, Keller U 1993 Comparison of the effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin on glucose and leucine kinetics in humans. J Clin Invest 92:1903–1909
  47. Turkalj I, Keller U, Ninnis R, Vosmeer S, Stauffacher W 1992 Effect of increasing doses of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I on glucose, lipid, and leucine metabolism in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:1186–1191[Abstract]
  48. Russell-Jones DL, Umpleby AM, Hennessy TR, Bowes SB, Shojaee-Moradie F, Hopkins KD, Jackson NC, Kelly JM, Jones RH, Sonksen PH 1994 Use of a leucine clamp to demonstrate that IGF-I actively stimulates protein synthesis in normal humans. Am J Physiol 267:E591–E598
  49. Fukagawa NK, Minaker KL, Rowe JW, Goodman MN, Matthews DE, Bier DM, Young VR 1985 Insulin-mediated reduction of whole body protein breakdown. Dose-response effects on leucine metabolism in postabsorptive men. J Clin Invest 76:2306–2311
  50. Louard RJ, Fryburg DA, Gelfand RA, Barrett EJ 1992 Insulin sensitivity of protein and glucose metabolism in human forearm skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest 90:2348–2354
  51. Cahill GF Jr., Marliss EB, Aoki TT 1970 Fat and nitrogen metabolism in fasting man. Horm Metab Res 2:181–185
  52. Felig P, Wahren J, Sherwin RS, Palaiologos G 1977 Amino acid and protein metabolism in diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 137:507–513[Abstract]
  53. Heiling VJ, Campbell PJ, Gottesman IS, Tsalikian E, Beaufrere B, Gerich JE, Haymond MW 1993 Differential effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on leucine rate of appearance in normal humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:203–206[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. G. Burt, G. Johannsson, A. M. Umpleby, D. J. Chisholm, and K. K. Y. Ho
Impact of Growth Hormone and Dehydroepiandrosterone on Protein Metabolism in Glucocorticoid-Treated Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 688 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. Gibney, M.-L. Healy, and P. H. Sonksen
The Growth Hormone/Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Axis in Exercise and Sport
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2007; 28(6): 603 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. C. Gormsen, N. Jessen, J. Gjedsted, S. Gjedde, H. Norrelund, S. Lund, J. S. Christiansen, S. Nielsen, O. Schmitz, and N. Moller
Dose-Response Effects of Free Fatty Acids on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism during Somatostatin Blockade of Growth Hormone and Insulin in Humans
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1834 - 1842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Sheikh, G. Camejo, B. Lanne, T. Halvarsson, M. R. Landergren, and N. D. Oakes
Beyond lipids, pharmacological PPAR{alpha} activation has important effects on amino acid metabolism as studied in the rat
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2007; 292(4): E1157 - E1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
L. J. Woodhouse, A. Mukherjee, S. M. Shalet, and S. Ezzat
The Influence of Growth Hormone Status on Physical Impairments, Functional Limitations, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults
Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2006; 27(3): 287 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J. Fuglsang, P. Sandager, N. Moller, S. Fisker, H. Orskov, and P. Ovesen
Kinetics and secretion of placental growth hormone around parturition.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 154(3): 449 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. L. Barkan, P. Burman, D. R. Clemmons, W. M. Drake, R. F. Gagel, P. E. Harris, P. J. Trainer, A. J. van der Lely, and M. L. Vance
Glucose Homeostasis and Safety in Patients with Acromegaly Converted from Long-Acting Octreotide to Pegvisomant
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5684 - 5691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
G. Lattuada, L. P. Sereni, D. Ruggieri, A. Scollo, S. Benedini, F. Ragogna, F. Costantino, A. Battezzati, L. Luzi, and G. Perseghin
Postabsorptive and Insulin-Stimulated Energy Homeostasis and Leucine Turnover in Offspring of Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Diabetes Care, November 1, 2004; 27(11): 2716 - 2722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nørrelund, H.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nørrelund, H.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals