| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Medical Sciences (M.S.C., M.H., P.M.S.), University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom; Bone Metabolism Group (A.B., R.E.), University of Sheffield, Sheffield S5 7AU, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology (P.E.G., W.A.B.), Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull NHS Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, United Kingdom; and Childrens Hospital Oakland Research Institute (C.H.S.), Oakland, California 94609
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Paul M. Stewart, M.D., F.R.C.P., F.Med.Sci., Endocrinology, Division of Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom E-mail: p.m.stewart{at}bham.ac.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have now tested the hypothesis that 11ß-HSD1 expression is a determinant of the sensitivity of bone to therapeutic glucocorticoids in vivo. We examined potential determinants of variation in the response of bone markers to low-dose glucocorticoid therapy and the relative effects of systemic vs. osteoblastic glucocorticoid metabolism on bone.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twenty healthy male volunteers (age, 31 ± 8 yr; mean ± SD) attended the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. All subjects gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee. Subjects were healthy with no serious illnesses, and none were taking topical, inhaled, or oral glucocorticoids. A 24-h urine sample and 0900-h fasting blood samples were taken before prednisolone treatment. Various anthropometric measurements were taken (height, weight, body mass index, waist to hip ratio) and a health check carried out. Oral prednisolone (APS Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Eastbourne, UK) was commenced at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (0900 and 2200 h) for 7 d. Additional 0900-h fasting blood samples were collected on d 4 and 8. No restrictions were placed on the behavior of the subjects. In a subsequent pharmacokinetics study, prednisolone 5 mg was administered at 0900 h to fasted volunteers. Thirty minutes later, breakfast was allowed. Blood samples were taken at baseline (before prednisolone) and 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300 min after prednisolone.
Collection of samples
Blood samples were taken, allowed to clot, and serum was stored at -70 C until analysis. For 24-h collections of urine, the total volume was measured and aliquots were stored at -20 C until analysis. Aliquots were stored at -50 C until analyzed.
Biochemical tests
An automated system was used to determine bone markers (Elecsys 2010 electrochemiluminescent assay; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). This system is capable of measuring a marker of bone resorption, serum ß-cross-linked C-telopeptide of type I collagen (ßCTX), and two markers of bone formation, N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), and osteocalcin (OC) as well as PTH. This PTH assay detects intact PTH and the N-terminal truncated PTH fragment (PTH 784), a fragment normally secreted by the parathyroid, which makes up about 10% of the circulating PTH in normal individuals. The OC assay detects both intact OC and the big N-terminal midfragment. The N-terminal midfragment is an in vitro degradation product (i.e. not a major in vivo degradation product) so the measurement of this fragment improves the stability of the assay. The interassay (within day) analytical coefficient of variation (CV) for each of these markers were 8.1%, 1.1%, 1.3%, and 1.9%, respectively, over this analytical range. The intraindividual CV over 10 d for OC, PINP, and ßCTX were 6.3%, 10.6%, and 19.1%, respectively.
Serum steroid levels
Serum steroid levels were analyzed by HPLC as described previously (14, 19). One hundred microliters of fludrocortisone (40 µmol/liter) were added to 1 ml serum, mixed with dichloromethane (10 ml), and then the aqueous phase was discarded. One milliliter of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide was added and after mixing, the aqueous phase was discarded, and this step was repeated. A similar wash step was repeated twice, replacing sodium hydroxide with filtered degassed water. Following the wash steps, the dichloromethane layer was evaporated to dryness and resuspended in 200 µl HPLC mobile phase. One hundred microliters of aqueous steroid standard or reconstituted extracted steroid were injected onto a 150 x 4.6 mm column packed with 5 µm ODS-2 (LUNA; Phenomenex, Macclesfield, UK). Mobile phase of tetrahydrofuran/water/methanol in the ratio 23:65:2 and containing 100 mmol/liter ammonium acetate was pumped at 1.0 ml/min. Steroids were detected at absorption at 254 nm. Using this assay, CV for within-day estimates of precision were 4.4% or less for the four steroids measured. CV over time ranged from 6.5% to 8.4% for the steroids measured, thus allowing determination of serum levels of prednisolone, prednisone, cortisol, and cortisone.
Urinary steroid metabolites
The gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy method used was based on that of Palermo et al. (20). Urinary-free steroids were measured by a method suitable for cortisol and its 3-oxo-4-ene metabolites including cortisone. For cortisol and cortisone, we used stable isotope-labeled internal standards ([9,11,12,12])2H4-cortisol and [9,12,12]2H3-cortisone, respectively). These standards were calibrated against accurately weighed and solubilized nonlabeled standards by HPLC analysis. After the addition of the deuterated internal standard mixture to 5 ml urine (0.12 µg d3-cortisone, 0.18 µg d4-cortisol), steroid extraction was carried out by Sep-pak C18 cartridges. To this extract, 200 ng stigmasterol and cholesteryl-butyrate were added as external standards and methyloxime-trimethylsilyl ether was prepared according to established procedures. After derivatization, the excess reagent was removed by Lipidx chromatography; and the samples were automatically introduced in a mass spectrometer (5970, Hewlett-Packard, Houston, TX) with a 15-m DB1 capillary column. Quantification was achieved by monitoring selected ions for the analytes (fragment 531 for cortisone and 605 for cortisol) and internal standards (m/Z 534 and 609, respectively). Relative peak areas were determined and reported as micrograms per 24 h of the individual compound. Validation of the method was performed by comparing the areas under the curve of increasing amounts of the analyte to the ratio between the areas of different amounts of the analyte and fixed concentrations of the internal standard (r = 0.998 for cortisol and 0.999 for cortisone). Intra and interassay CV were less than 10% for both cortisol and cortisone. 11ß-HSD1 activity was calculated as the tetrahydrocortisol + allo-tetrahydrocortisol)/tetrahydrocortisone (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio (20). 11ß-HSD2 activity was calculated as the urinary-free cortisol/cortisone ratio (UFF/UFE). Total cortisol metabolites (THF, alloTHF, THE, alloTHE, cortols, cortolones, UFF, UFE) were used as an index of total cortisol secretion.
Bone density measurement
BMD was measured at the hip (femoral trochanter, neck, and Wards triangle) spine (L24), and total body using a Lunar DPX dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanner. The scanner was regularly calibrated using phantoms to ensure accuracy of bone density measurements over time.
Statistics
ANOVA was used to examine changes in bone markers. Associations between variables were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients. All statistical tests were carried out using SigmaStat 2.03 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As anticipated, following prednisolone treatment the mean serum concentrations of both OC and PICP decreased significantly (Fig. 1
). ßCTx and PTH showed no change, in keeping with previous studies (3, 6, 7).
|
There was a significant correlation between the maximal decrease in OC and the urinary (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio, a measure of 11ß-HSD1 activity. This relationship was evident as early as d 4 (r = 0.57, P < 0.01) and persisted at d 7 (r = 0.57, P < 0.01) (Fig. 2
).
|
|
The relationship between 11ß-HSD1 activity and circulating prednisolone levels was examined in a pharmacokinetic study. There was no relationship between prednisolone half-life and (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio (r = -0.05). To determine whether individuals with high 11ß-HSD1 activity had an increase in systemic bioavailable prednisolone, the area under the prednisolone time curves in each individual (an estimate of the total circulating prednisolone) was measured. There was no indication that total circulating prednisolone level increased with increasing (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio (r = 0.04). Thus, systemic regeneration of prednisolone is unlikely to explain the changes in bone formation markers.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased systemic 11ß-HSD1 activity could theoretically prolong the prednisolone half-life by augmenting systemic glucocorticoid levels through conversion of prednisone to prednisolone. However, this did not appear to be a major effect as assessed by circulatory prednisolone half-life or area under the prednisolone-time curve. It seems likely therefore that osteoblastic 11ß-HSD1 expression determines the degree of suppression of bone formation markers post prednisolone challenge.
This trial intentionally used a prednisolone dose typical of maintenance steroid doses used during treatment for many long-term inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and asthma. It was anticipated that these doses would not maximally inhibit OC levels in all individuals and, thus, differences in susceptibility between individuals could be examined. We gave the steroid in a daily divided dose to reduce the peak postdose level of prednisolone and increase the daily duration that osteoblasts would be exposed to circulating prednisone. We previously demonstrated that after a 5-mg dose of prednisolone, prednisone concentrations increase rapidly and remain relatively constant for up to 6 h, but prednisolone levels fall relatively quickly (14). With higher doses of prednisolone, it is possible that the direct action of circulating prednisolone on osteoblasts would maximally inhibit bone formation markers making the contribution from locally generated prednisolone of less importance.
The role of (THF+alloTHF)/THE measurement in determining steroid sensitivity in a clinical setting remains unclear. Although this may be an effective predictive measurement in healthy individuals, inflammation may lead to dysregulation of the (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio. Proinflammatory cytokines increase 11ß-HSD1 activity in osteoblasts (17), but this effect is not seen in human hepatocytes (21). Additionally, at least in vitro, glucocorticoids increase expression of 11ß-HSD1 expression in osteoblasts (14). It is, thus, possible that local glucocorticoid activation will increase further during glucocorticoid treatment. Whether the (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio will still have a predictive value in a clinical setting is, thus, uncertain and needs further exploration. With this in mind, the correlation of PINP with the (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio was significant at d 4 but not d 7, although the trend was similar. It seems likely that the lack of statistical significance relates to the smaller reduction in PINP levels with prednisolone, compared with OC and the greater intraindividual variation of PINP than OC levels. However, it is also possible that this reflects a change in the relationship between PINP and the (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio over time.
Although changes in bone markers are a useful surrogate measure of bone formation, it is not clear whether these correlate with changes in BMD or fracture risk. Recent studies indicate that BMD changes may only partly reflect changes in fracture risk with bisphosphonate treatment (22). This appears to be due to the importance of bone turnover in bone health, which is not measured by BMD. Changes in bone markers may have additional value independent of BMD because these measures take account of bone turnover and, thus, may be more informative. Because of the large number of subjects needed, it would be impossible to do a similar trial with fracture end points, so it remains an assumption that bone marker changes will reliably measure susceptibility to fracture.
Our finding of unchanged bone resorption during glucocorticoid treatment are similar to those of previous studies (5). No relationship between changes in ßCTx or PTH and corticosteroid metabolism was seen. This is despite osteoclasts expressing 11ß-HSD1 (assessed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization) (13). It is possible that there is a different set point in the directionality of osteoclastic 11ß-HSD1, compared with osteoblastic 11ß-HSD1, but more likely the time course of the study was too short to detect changes induced by differences in osteoclast differentiation mediated by differences in 11ß-HSD1 activity. It is also possible that changes in resorption markers will only be seen in the presence of sex steroid deficiency.
These findings extend the link between tissue-specific metabolism of glucocorticoids and steroid-induced side effects. Decreased 11ß-HSD1 expression may protect against glucocorticoid excess in Cushings syndrome (23), and increased 11ß-HSD1 activity in osteoblasts may partly underlie age-related bone loss (14). Decreased systemic 11ß-HSD1 activity is seen in obesity (24), and it is possible that such a decrease in osteoblastic 11ß-HSD1 activity accounts for the positive relationship between obesity and bone density. What is clear is that much of the variability in the skeletal response to glucocorticoids is explained by differences in metabolism of glucocorticoids probably at an autocrine level within bone. This knowledge is likely to improve our ability to predict the skeletal effects of glucocorticoids and more effectively target prophylactic agents. This work also illustrates that synthetic glucocorticoids designed such that they are unable to be reactivated locally within osteoblasts would be expected to have a bone-sparing effect.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: BMD, Bone mineral density; ßCTX, ß-cross-linked C-telopeptide of type I collagen; CV, coefficient of variation; 11ß-HSD, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzyme; 11ß-HSD1, 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1; OC, osteocalcin; PINP, N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen; (THF+alloTHF)/THE ratio, tetrahydrocortisol + allo-tetrahydrocortisol)/tetrahydrocortisone ratio; UFF/UFE ratio, urinary-free cortisol/cortisone ratio.
Received January 2, 2003.
Accepted May 6, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R Hardy and M S Cooper Bone loss in inflammatory disorders J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2009; 201(3): 309 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. W. Yau, K. M. McNair, J. Noble, D. Brownstein, C. Hibberd, N. Morton, J. J. Mullins, R. G. M. Morris, S. Cobb, and J. R. Seckl Enhanced Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation and Spatial Learning in Aged 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Knock-Out Mice J. Neurosci., September 26, 2007; 27(39): 10487 - 10496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Tomlinson, M. Sherlock, B. Hughes, S. V. Hughes, F. Kilvington, W. Bartlett, R. Courtney, P. Rejto, W. Carley, and P. M. Stewart Inhibition of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Activity in Vivo Limits Glucocorticoid Exposure to Human Adipose Tissue and Decreases Lipolysis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 857 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Eijken, M. Hewison, M. S. Cooper, F. H. de Jong, H. Chiba, P. M. Stewart, A. G. Uitterlinden, H. A. P. Pols, and J. P. T. M. van Leeuwen 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Expression and Glucocorticoid Synthesis Are Directed by a Molecular Switch during Osteoblast Differentiation Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 19(3): 621 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Y. Zhang, X. Ding, and R. A. Daynes The Expression of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type I by Lymphocytes Provides a Novel Means for Intracrine Regulation of Glucocorticoid Activities J. Immunol., January 15, 2005; 174(2): 879 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gulati, K. Gulati, T. Sugiyama, H. Tanaka, T. Taguchi, M. S. Cooper, P. M. Stewart, M. B. Leonard, B. S. Zemel, and V. A. Stallings Glucocorticoids and Bone Mineral Content in the Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome N. Engl. J. Med., December 16, 2004; 351(25): 2655 - 2657. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Tomlinson, E. A. Walker, I. J. Bujalska, N. Draper, G. G. Lavery, M. S. Cooper, M. Hewison, and P. M. Stewart 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1: A Tissue-Specific Regulator of Glucocorticoid Response Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2004; 25(5): 831 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Sher, H. W. Woitge, D. J. Adams, G. A. Gronowicz, Z. Krozowski, J. R. Harrison, and B. E. Kream Transgenic Expression of 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 in Osteoblasts Reveals an Anabolic Role for Endogenous Glucocorticoids in Bone Endocrinology, February 1, 2004; 145(2): 922 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |