help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Leung, P. C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Leung, P. C. K.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 8 3806-3815
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Differential Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone I and II on the Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor System in Human Decidual Stromal Cells in Vitro

Chun-Shan Chou, Colin D. MacCalman and Peter C. K. Leung

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3V5

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Peter C. K. Leung, Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Room 2H-30, 4490 Oak Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6H 3V5. E-mail: peleung{at}interchange.ubc.ca.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To date, the factors capable of regulating the coordinate expression of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its endogenous inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), at the maternal-fetal interface remain poorly characterized. In these studies we examined the ability of the classical form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) I and the second, mammalian form of this hormone, GnRH II, to regulate uPA and PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in cultures of stromal cells isolated from first trimester decidual tissues using quantitative competitive-PCR and ELISA, respectively. GnRH I and GnRH II increased uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in these primary cell cultures in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In contrast, GnRH I increased, whereas GnRH II decreased PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in these cells. Cetrorelix, a GnRH receptor antagonist, inhibited the regulatory effects of GnRH I, but not GnRH II, on uPA and PAI-1 expression levels in these decidual stromal cell cultures. Taken together, these observations suggest that GnRH I and GnRH II differentially regulate the balance between uPA and PAI-1 expression levels in the human decidua, possibly via distinct receptor-mediated signaling pathways.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF a successful pregnancy is dependent upon the coordinated development of the implanting embryo and the maternal endometrium (1, 2). In particular, the blastocyst must have attained the ability to attach to endometrial epithelium and subsequently invade the underlying decidua. However, unlike tumor cells, trophoblast invasion of the underlying maternal tissues is highly regulated, and errors can have severe consequences for the health of both the mother and the fetus (3, 4). The terminal differentiation of the endometrial stroma into decidua, which begins in the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle and continues into early pregnancy, is believed to be a critical event in the development of a uterine environment that is capable of fulfilling this embryo regulatory role (3, 5).

The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its endogenous inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), play key roles in the highly regulated series of remodeling events that occur in the endometrium in preparation for pregnancy (6, 7, 8). In particular, uPA is believed to mediate, at least in part, the degradation of the endometrial extracellular matrix (ECM) underlying the development of the decidua and the regulated invasion of extravillous cytotrophoblasts. The proteolytic activity of uPA at the maternal-fetal interface is counterbalanced, in both an autocrine and a paracrine manner, by PAI-1 secreted by the decidual cells and the subpopulation(s) of highly invasive extravillous cytotrophoblasts. Although it is recognized that the remodeling of the decidual ECM is a critical step in the establishment of pregnancy, the factors capable of regulating the coordinate expression of uPA and PAI-1 in this dynamic tissue remain poorly characterized.

We have recently determined that both the classical form of GnRH (GnRH I) and the second mammalian form of this hormone (GnRH II) are key regulators of uPA-1 and PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in extravilllous cytotrophoblasts propagated from first trimester placental explants (9). In particular, GnRH I and GnRH II increased uPA and concomitantly decreased PAI-1 expression levels in these primary cell cultures. As GnRH I and GnRH II are secreted by both human placenta and endometrium (10, 11, 12, 13), it is tempting to speculate that these two hormones may be key regulators of the proteolytic degradation of ECM that occurs at the maternal-fetal interface during early pregnancy. To gain a better understanding of the role(s) of GnRH I and GnRH II in this developmental process, we examined the ability of GnRH I and GnRH II to regulate uPA and PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in primary cultures of stromal cells isolated from first trimester decidual tissues in a dose- and time-dependent manner.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tissues

Tissue samples of first trimester decidua parietalis were obtained from women undergoing elective termination of pregnancy. The use of these tissues was approved by the committee for ethical review of research involving human subjects, University of British Columbia. All patients provided informed written consent.

Cell isolation and culture

Stromal cells were isolated from the decidual tissue samples by enzymatic digestion and mechanical dissociation using a protocol modified from that reported by Shiokawa et al. (14). Briefly, the decidual tissue samples were minced and subjected to 0.1% collagenase (type IV; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 0.1% hyaluronidase (type I-S) digestion in a shaking water bath at 37 C for 60 min. The cell digest was then passed through a nylon sieve (38 µm). The isolated glands and any undigested tissue fragments were retained on the sieve, and the eluate containing the stromal cells was collected in a 50-ml tube. The stromal cells were then pelleted by centrifugation at 800 x g for 10 min at room temperature. The cell pellet was washed once, resuspended, and plated in DMEM containing 25 mM glucose, L-glutamine, antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin), and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 17ß-estradiol (10 nM; Sigma-Aldrich), and progesterone (1 µM; Sigma-Aldrich). The culture medium was replaced 30 min after plating to reduce epithelial cell contamination. The purity of the decidual stromal cell cultures was determined by immunocytochemical staining for vimentin, cytokeratin, muscle actin, and factor VIII (data not shown). These cellular markers have been used previously to determine the purity of human endometrial cell cultures (15). As defined by these criteria, the decidual stromal cell cultures used in these studies contained less than 1% epithelial or vascular cells.

Hormone treatments

Decidual stromal cells (passage 2) were plated in 35-mm2 tissue culture dishes (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) at a density of 1 x 106 cells/dish and grown to 80% confluence. The cells were then cultured in the presence of increasing concentrations of GnRH I or GnRH II (0, 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 nM) for 24 h or a fixed concentration of GnRH I or GnRH II (100 nM) for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, or 48 h. In addition, decidual stromal cell cultures were treated with a combination of GnRH I or GnRH II (100 nM) and increasing concentrations (0, 1, 10, or 100 nM) of the GnRH I antagonist, Cetrorelix (AnaSpec, Inc., San Jose, CA), for 24 h. Cells treated with vehicle (0.1% ethanol) alone served as a control for these experiments. The viability of the decidual cell cultures under these experimental conditions was determined by a trypan blue exclusion assay.

Primer design

The design and nucleotide sequences of the primer sets specific for uPA, or PAI-1 used in the quantitative competitive-PCR (QC-PCR) analysis, or the housekeeping gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, used to quantify and assess the integrity of the total RNA samples, have been described in detail previously (9).

RNA preparation and RT-PCR

Total RNA was prepared from the decidual stromal cell cultures with an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Mississauga, Canada) using a protocol recommended by the manufacturer. The concentration of total RNA present in each of the extracts was quantified by optical densitometry (260/280 nm) using a Du-64 UV spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). An aliquot (1 µg) of the total RNA extracts prepared from these cell cultures was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Oakville, Canada).

PCR was performed using template cDNA generated from the total RNA extracts prepared from cultures of untreated decidual stromal cells and the primer sets specific for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, uPA, or PAI-1. The PCR conditions were as follows: 1 min at 94 C; 1 min at 57.5 or 56 C for PAI-1 and uPA, respectively; and 1.5 min at 72 C, followed by a final extension at 72 C for 15 min. The cycles were repeated 20–35 times. A linear relationship between the yield of the PCR products and the number of cycles performed was observed after 27 cycles for uPA and after 30 cycles for PAI-1 (data not shown).

The resultant PCR products for uPA and PAI-1 were separated using gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining (data not shown). An aliquot of these uPA and PAI-1 PCR products was subcloned into the PCR II vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and subjected to DNA sequence analysis to confirm the specificity of the primers. These clones were also used to generate target or internal standard uPA and PAI-1 cDNA fragments by standard molecular biology techniques.

QC-PCR

The QC-PCR strategy employed in these studies is based upon the competitive co-amplification of a known amount of an internal standard specific for uPA or PAI-1 added to aliquots of the first strand cDNA prepared from our primary cultures of decidual stromal cells (9, 16, 17).

To determine the optimal amounts of the internal standards to be used in the QC-PCR analysis, PCR reaction mixtures containing a fixed amounts of the target uPAI-1 or PAI-1 cDNAs (1 µl) and decreasing concentrations of the corresponding internal standard cDNAs (8–0.0625 pg/µl for uPA or 8–0.125 pg/µl PAI-1, respectively) were prepared. PCR was then performed using these cDNA mixtures and the distinct uPA or PAI-1 primer sets under the optimized conditions described above.

An aliquot (10 µl) of the resultant uPA and PAI-1 PCR products was separated by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining (Fig. 1Go). The intensity of the ethidium bromide staining of the PCR products was analyzed using UV densitometry (Biometra, Whiteman Co., Gottigen, German). Volume counts (square millimeters) of the PCR products were then determined using Scion Image computer software (Scion Image Co., Frederick, MD). The absorbance values obtained for each of the target and corresponding internal standard were plotted against the amount of internal standard added to the initial reaction mixtures, with the point of interception on these line graphs being taken as the optimal amount of internal standard to be used in the QC-PCR analysis (Fig. 1Go). Based upon these observations, uPA or PAI-1 internal standard cDNAs were added to aliquots of the first strand cDNA generated from the human decidual cells to be used in the QC-PCR analysis at concentrations of 1 or 0.5 pg/µl, respectively.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Preparation of standard curves for the QC-PCR analysis of uPA and PAI-1 mRNA levels in decidual stromal cells. A and B, Photomicrographs of ethidium bromide-stained gels containing PCR products generated using a fixed amount of target cDNA and increasing amounts of the corresponding internal standard. The sizes of the resultant PCR products relative to a 100-bp ladder (MW) are indicated. The intensity of the ethidium bromide staining of these PCR products was determined by UV densitometry, and the resultant absorbance values plotted against the amount of internal standard added to each PCR are shown in the line graphs below. C and D, Photomicrographs of ethidium bromide gels containing PCR products generated using a fixed amount of internal standard and decreasing amounts of target uPA or PAI-1 cDNAs. The intensities of the ethidium bromide staining of the target and internal standard PCR products were determined by UV densitometry. The linear relationship between the logarithmically transformed ratios of target/internal standard cDNAs and the amount of target cDNA added to the initial PCR is shown in the graphs below.

 
PCR was also used to coamplify the optimized amounts of uPA and PAI-1 internal standard cDNAs and increasing amounts of the corresponding target cDNAs (0.0625–8 pg/µl). The ratios of the intensity of the ethidium bromide staining of the resultant target/internal standard PCR products generated in each tube were logarithmically transformed and plotted against the log amount of target cDNA initially added to the PCR reaction. Representative standard curves generated for uPA and PAI-1 are presented in Fig. 1Go. These standard curves were highly reproducible and linear. The values obtained from these regression curves (y = b + mx) were subsequently used to quantify the levels of uPA and PAI-1 mRNA transcripts present in our decidual stromal cell cultures.

QC-PCR was performed using the uPA or PAI-1 primer sets and 1 µl of the first strand cDNA synthesized from each of the treated decidual stromal cell cultures containing the optimized amount of the corresponding internal standard cDNA under the PCR conditions described above. The ratios of the intensity of ethidium bromide staining of the resultant target/internal standard PCR products were logarithmically transformed and compared to the values obtained from the standard curves.

ELISA

The expression levels of uPA and PAI-1 in the conditioned medium collected from the decidual stromal cell cultures were measured using ELISA kits for uPA or PAI-1 (American Diagnostica, Inc., Greenwich, CA). uPA was detected in the conditioned culture medium with mean intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 4.9% and 8.2%, respectively, whereas PAI-1 was detected in the conditioned medium with mean intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 6.1% and 8.8%, respectively. All samples were assayed in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

The absorbance values obtained from the ethidium bromide-stained gels were subjected to statistical analysis using GraphPad PRISM 2 computer software (San Diego, CA). Statistical differences between the absorbance values were assessed by ANOVA. Differences were considered significant for P <= 0.05. Significant differences between the means were determined using Dunnett’s test. The results are presented as the mean relative absorbance ± SEM obtained from five independent experiments.

Statistical differences between the dose- or time-dependent effects of GnRH I or GnRH II on uPA or PAI-1 protein expression levels detected in the conditioned media of decidual stromal cells were assessed by ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s test. The results are presented as the mean protein expression levels ± SEM obtained from five independent experiments.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GnRH I and GnRH II increase uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in primary cultures of decidual stromal cells

u-PA mRNA transcripts and protein expression were detected in all of the decidual stromal cell cultures. The addition of vehicle to the culture medium had no significant effect on the uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in these primary cell cultures at any of the time points examined in these studies (data not shown). In contrast, GnRH I and GnRH II increased uPA mRNA levels and protein expression in the cultured decidual stromal cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2Go).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of increasing concentrations of GnRH I or GnRH II. A and B, Representative photomicrographs of ethidium bromide-stained gels containing QC-PCR products generated using template cDNA synthesized from decidual cells cultured in the presence of 0, 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 nM for 24 h (lanes 1–5, respectively). The sizes of the resultant target and internal standard PCR products relative to a 100-bp ladder (lane MW) are marked on the left of the photomicrograph. The intensity of the ethidium bromide staining of the PCR products was determined by UV densitometry, and the resultant absorbance values were used to calculate the ratio of target to internal standard cDNA for each QC-PCR reaction. The results derived from this analysis as well as those from four other independent studies (data not shown) are presented (mean ± SEM; n = 5) in the bar graphs below. a, P < 0.001; b, P < 0.05 (vs. untreated control). C and D, ELISA analysis of uPA expression levels in the conditioned medium of these decidual stromal cells. One milligram of protein from conditioned medium was used in each ELISA. Data are shown as the means of five independent assays ± SEM. a, P < 0.001 vs. untreated control.

 
A significant increase in uPA mRNA levels was detected in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of GnRH I for 12 h, with maximum levels observed after 24 h of culture under these experimental conditions (Fig. 3Go). Although there was a slight decline in uPA mRNA levels in decidual cells cultured in the presence of GnRH I for 48 h, the levels of this mRNA transcript were still significantly greater than those detected in the 0 h control. A significant and progressive increase in uPA protein expression levels was detected in these cell cultures until the termination of these studies at 48 h.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Time-dependent effects of GnRH I or GnRH II on uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells. A and B, QC-PCR analysis of uPA mRNA levels in decidual cells cultured in the presence of GnRH I or GnRH II (100 nM) for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, or 48 h (lanes 1–6, respectively). The sizes of the resultant target and internal standard PCR products relative to a 100-bp ladder (lane MW) are marked to the right of the photomicrograph. The absorbance values obtained from five independent studies are presented (mean ± SEM) in the bar graphs below. a, P < 0.001; b, P < 0.05 (vs. 0 h control). C and D, ELISA analysis of uPA expression levels in the conditioned medium of these decidual stromal cells. Data are shown as the mean of five independent assays ± SEM. a, P < 0.001 vs. 0 h control.

 
The levels of the uPA mRNA transcript present in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of GnRH II were significantly higher after 12 h of culture and continued to increase until the termination of these studies at 48 h (Fig. 3Go). A coordinate increase in the expression levels of uPA in these decidual stromal cell cultures was also observed at all of the time points examined (Fig. 3Go).

Differential effects of GnRH I and GnRH II on PAI-1 mRNA and protein levels in decidual stromal cells

PAI-1 mRNA transcripts and protein expression were detected in all of the decidual stromal cell cultures. The addition of vehicle to the culture medium had no significant effect on PAI-1 mRNA or protein expression levels in these cells at any of the time points examined in these studies (data not shown).

GnRH I increased, whereas GnRH II decreased, PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in our primary cultures of decidual stromal cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of increasing concentrations of GnRH I or GnRH II. A and B, QC-PCR analysis of PAI-1 mRNA levels in decidual cells cultured in the presence of 0, 0.1, 1, 10, or 100 nM for 24 h (lanes 1–5, respectively). The sizes of the resultant target and internal standard PCR products relative to a 100-bp ladder (lane MW) are marked to the right of the photomicrograph. The absorbance values obtained from five independent studies are presented (mean ± SEM) in the bar graphs below. a, P < 0.001; b, P < 0.05 (vs. untreated control). C and D, ELISA analysis of PAI-1 expression levels in the conditioned medium of these decidual stromal cell cultures. Data are shown as the mean of five independent assays ± SEM. a, P < 0.001 vs. untreated control.

 
There was a significant increase in PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of GnRH I for 3 h, with maximum levels observed in cells after 12 h of treatment (Fig. 5Go). There was a subsequent and progressive decline in PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in these primary cell cultures until the termination of these studies at 48 h.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Time-dependent effects of GnRH I or GnRH II on PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells. A and B, QC-PCR analysis of PAI-1 mRNA levels in decidual cells cultured in the presence of GnRH I or GnRH II (100 nM) for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, or 48 h (lanes 1–6, respectively). The absorbance values obtained from five independent studies are presented (mean ± SEM) in the bar graphs below. a, P < 0.001; b, P < 0.05 (vs. untreated control). C and D, ELISA analysis of PAI-1 expression levels in the conditioned medium of these decidual stromal cell cultures. Data are shown as the mean of five independent assays ± SEM. a, P < 0.001; b, P < 0.05 (vs. untreated control).

 
In contrast, the addition of GnRH II to the culture medium of decidual stromal cells resulted in a decrease in PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels within 3 h of treatment. PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in these cells continued to decline until 24 h, after which PAI-1 mRNA and protein levels increased (Fig. 5Go).

Effects of Cetrorelix on the GnRH I- or GnRH II-mediated regulation of uPA and PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells

Cetrorelix inhibited the stimulatory effects of GnRH I on uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in cultured decidual stromal cells in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, Cetrorelix had no significant effect on the GnRH II-mediated increase in uPA mRNA and protein levels in these primary cell cultures at any of the concentrations examined in these studies (Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effects of Cetrorelix on uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of GnRH I or GnRH II. A and B, QC-PCR analysis of uPA mRNA levels in untreated decidual cells (lane 1) or cells cultured in the presence of a fixed amount of GnRH I or GnRH II (100 nM) and increasing amounts (0, 1, 10, or 100 nM) of the GnRH antagonist, Cetrorelix (lanes 2–5, respectively), for 24 h. The sizes of the resultant target and internal standard PCR products relative to a 100-bp ladder (lane MW) are marked to the right of the photomicrograph. The absorbance values obtained from five independent studies are presented (mean ± SEM) in the bar graphs below. a, P < 0.001; b, P < 0.05 (vs. treatment with GnRH I or GnRH II alone). C and D, ELISA analysis of uPA expression level in conditioned medium of these decidual stromal cells. Data are shown as the mean of five independent assays ± SEM. a, P < 0.001 (vs. treatment with GnRH I or GnRH II alone).

 
Cetrorelix also inhibited the GnRH I-mediated decrease in PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in our decidual stromal cell cultures in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the addition of this GnRH I antagonist to the culture medium had no significant effect on the uPA mRNA and protein levels in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of GnRH II at any of the concentrations examined in these studies (Fig. 7Go).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Effects of Cetrorelix on PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of GnRH I or GnRH II. A and B, QC-PCR analysis of PAI-1 mRNA levels in untreated decidual cells (lane 1) or cells cultured in the presence of a fixed amount of GnRH I or GnRH II (100 nM) and increasing amounts (0, 1, 10, or 100 nM) of the GnRH antagonist, Cetrorelix (lanes 2–5, respectively), for 24 h. The sizes of the resultant target and internal standard PCR products relative to a 100-bp ladder (lane MW) are marked to the right of the photomicrograph. The absorbance values obtained from five independent studies are presented (mean ± SEM) in the bar graphs below. a, P < 0.001; b, P < 0.05 (vs. treatment with GnRH I or GnRH II alone). C and D, ELISA analysis of PAI-1 expression level in conditioned medium of these decidual stromal cells. Data are shown as the mean of five independent assays ± SEM. a, P < 0.001 (vs. treatment with GnRH I or GnRH II alone).

 
Ratio of uPA/PAI-1 expression levels in conditioned medium of decidual stromal cells treated with GnRH I or GnRH II

The ratio of uPA/PAI-1 expression levels in the samples of conditioned media obtained from decidual cells cultured in the presence of GnRH II was significantly greater than those obtained from cells treated with GnRH I at all of the hormone concentrations examined in these studies (Fig. 8Go).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Line graph depicting the ratio of uPA/PAI-1 protein expression levels in samples of conditioned medium obtained from decidual stromal cells cultured in the presence of increasing concentrations of GnRH I or GnRH II (0–100 nM) for 24 h.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Here we report that GnRH I and GnRH II are both capable of increasing uPA expression in human decidual stromal cells. In contrast, GnRH I increased, whereas GnRH II caused a significant decrease in PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in these primary cell cultures. We recently determined that both GnRH I and GnRH II increase uPA-1 and concomitantly decrease PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in primary cultures of human extravillous cytotrophoblasts (9). In addition, we found that GnRH I increases the expression levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in stromal cells isolated from first trimester decidual tissues (17), two other proteases operative at the maternal fetal interface during pregnancy (18, 19). GnRH I has also been shown to be capable of decreasing the levels of the tissue-specific inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and -3 present in human endometrial stromal cells allowed to undergo steroid-mediated decidualization in vitro (20). In view of these observations, it is tempting to speculate that GnRH I and GnRH II play key regulatory roles in the proteolytic degradation of the ECM of the endometrial stroma, a prerequisite for decidualization and the subsequent invasion of trophoblasts (1, 2).

GnRH II has been shown to mimic the biological actions of GnRH I (21). Often, the effects of GnRH II on extrapituitary tissues and cells appear to be significantly greater than those observed with native GnRH I and/or its synthetic analogs. For example, the antiproliferative effects of GnRH II on human endometrial and ovarian cancer cells were significantly greater than those observed in cells cultured in the presence of equivalent concentrations of GnRH I or the GnRH I agonist, triptorelin (22). GnRH II has also been shown to have a more potent regulatory effect on the secretion of human chorionic gonadotropin by human term placenta and the steroidogenic capacity of granulosa-lutein cells in vitro (13, 23). However, we determined that GnRH I and GnRH II have differential effects on PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in primary cultures of decidual stromal cells. To our knowledge, these studies are the first to demonstrate that GnRH I and GnRH II are capable of having differential biological actions on mammalian cells and suggest that the regulatory effects of these two hormones may be tissue/cell-specific. Although the molecular mechanisms underlying the differential effects of GnRH I and GnRH II on PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in these cell cultures have yet to be elucidated, our observations suggest that these distinct biological actions may be due to differences in the binding affinity of GnRH I and GnRH II to one or more GnRH receptors (GnRHRs) and/or the activation of distinct intracellular signaling pathways.

Although significant GnRHR mRNA levels have not been detected in total RNA extracts prepared from human endometrial tissues obtained at any stage of the menstrual cycle or in early pregnancy (24), recent studies have demonstrated that this mRNA transcript is present in primary cultures of human endometrial stromal cells (25). In addition, low binding affinity/high capacity binding and high binding affinity/low capacity binding sites for GnRH I have been detected in normal and malignant human endometrial cells, suggesting that two distinct GnRHRs are present in this dynamic tissue (26). Recently, a gene encoding a second receptor for GnRH (GnRHR II) has been identified in the human genome (21, 27). Although a full-length mRNA transcript encoding this second form of human GnRHR has not been isolated, GnRHR II mRNA transcripts have been detected in the human endometrium and placenta (22). The ability of Cetrorelix, an antagonist believed to be specific for the GnRHR I (21), to inhibit the regulatory effects of GnRH I, but not GnRH II, on uPA and PAI mRNA levels in stromal cells isolated from first trimester decidual tissues provides further evidence that the biological actions of these two hormones may be elicited by distinct receptors.

Prolonged exposure to GnRH I resulted in decreases in uPA and PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in the primary cultures of decidual stromal cells. Similarly, the inhibitory effects of GnRH II on PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in decidual stromal cells were reduced with time in culture. This biphasic effect may be attributed to the desensitization of GnRHR-I, a biological phenomenon often observed in GnRH I-stimulated pituitary cells (28). GnRH I binding to its receptor activates several intracellular signaling pathways, including protein kinase A, protein kinase C, and/or MAPK (ERK1/2) cascades (29). Recent studies indicate that the activation of the ERK1/2 signaling cascade by GnRH I involves the trans-activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (30). Interestingly, there is a marked increase in EGFR expression in the endometrial stroma as it undergoes decidualization, with maximum levels being detected in decidua cells present at the maternal-fetal interface (31). EGFR agonists have also been shown to increase PAI-1 expression levels in human endometrial stromal cells undergoing steroid-mediated decidualization in vitro (31, 32). In contrast, invasive extravillous cytotrophoblasts do not express significant levels of EGFR (33, 34). Thus, the differential effects of GnRH on PAI-1 mRNA and protein expression levels in primary cultures of decidual stromal cells and extravillous cytotrophoblasts may be due to the presence or absence of EGR in these two cell types, respectively.

In summary, we have determined that GnRH I and GnRH II increase uPA mRNA and protein expression levels in primary cultures of stromal cells isolated from first trimester decidual tissues in a dose- and time-dependent manner. In contrast, GnRH I increased, whereas GnRH II decreased, the expression levels of the endogenous inhibitor of uPA, PAI-1, in these cell cultures. These findings strengthen our hypothesis that the two forms of GnRH secreted by the placenta and endometrium play key regulatory roles in the ECM remodeling events that occur at the maternal-fetal interface during pregnancy in humans.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide primers for decidual stromal cell mRNA amplification

 

    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to P.C.K.L. and C.D.M.).

C.D.M. and P.C.K.L. contributed equally to these studies.

C.D.M. is a Career Investigator with the British Columbia Research Institute for Children’s and Women’s Health.

P.C.K.L. is a Recipient of a Senior Investigatorship from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research.

Abbreviations: ECM, Extracellular matrix; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; GnRHR, GnRH receptor; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1; QC-PCR, quantitative competitive-PCR; uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator.

Received December 12, 2002.

Accepted May 12, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tabibzadeh S, Babaknia A 1995 The signals and molecular pathways involved in implantation, a symbiotic interaction between blastocyst and endometrium involving adhesion and tissue invasion. Hum Reprod 10:1579–15602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Paria BC, Reese J, Das SK, Dey SK 2002 Deciphering the cross-talk of implantation: advances and challenges. Science 296:2185–2188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Graham CH, Lala PK 1992 Mechanisms of placental invasion of the uterus and their control. Biochem Cell Biol 70:867–874[Medline]
  4. Paradinas FJ, Fisher RA 1995 Pathology and molecular genetics of trophoblastic disease. Curr Obstet Gynecol 5:6–12
  5. Lockwood CJ, Krikun G, Schatz F 1999 The decidua regulates hemostasis in human endometrium. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 17:45–51[Medline]
  6. Feinberg RF, Kao LC, Haimowitz JE, Queenan JT, Wun TC, Strauss JF, Kliman HJ 1989 Plasminogen activator inhibitor types 1 and 2 in human trophoblasts. PAI-1 is an immunocytochemical marker of invading trophoblasts. Lab Invest 61:20–26[Medline]
  7. Floridon C, Nielsen O, Holund B, Sunde L, Westergaard JG, Thomsen SG, Teisner B 1999 Localization and significance of urokinase plasminogen activator and its receptor in placental tissue from intrauterine, ectopic and molar pregnancies. Placenta 20:711–721[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Schatz F, Krikun G, Runic R, Wang EY, Hausknecht V, Lockwood CJ 1999 Implications of decidualization-associated protease expression in implantation and placentation. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 17:3–12[Medline]
  9. Chou CS Zhu H, Shalev E, MacCalman CD, Leung PCK 2002 The effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) I and GnRH II on the urokinase type plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor system in human extravillous cytotrophoblasts in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:5594–5603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Raga F, Casan EM, Kruessel JS, Wen Y, Huang HY, Nezhat C, Polan ML 1998 Quantitative gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression and immunohistochemical localization in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. Biol Reprod 59:661–669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cheon KW, Lee HS, Parhar IS, Kang IS 2001 Expression of the second form of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH II) in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod 7:447–452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kikkawa F, Kajiyama H, Ino K, Watanabe Y, Ito M, Nomura S, Itakura A, Tsujimoto M, Mizutani S 2002 Possible involvement of placental peptidases that degrade gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in the dynamic pattern of placental hCG secretion via GnRH degradation. Placenta 23:483–489[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Siler-Khodr TM, Grayson M 2001 Action of chicken II GnRH on the human placenta. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:804–810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Shiokawa S, Yoshimura Y, Nagamatsu S, Sawa H, Hanashi H, Oda T, Katsumata Y, Koyama N, Nakamura Y 1996 Expression of ß-1 integrins in human endometrial stromal and decidual cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1533–1540[Abstract]
  15. Irwin JC, Kirk D, King RJ, Quigley MM, Gwatkin RB 1989 Hormonal regulation of human endometrial stromal cells in culture: an in vitro model for decidualization. Fertil Steril 52:761–768[Medline]
  16. Jin CF, Mata M, Fink DJ 1994 Rapid construction of deleted DNA fragments for use as internal standards in competitive PCR. PCR Methods Appl 3:252–255[Medline]
  17. Chou CS, Tai CJ, MacCalman CD, Leung PCK 2003 Dose-dependent effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 and tissue specific inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 messenger ribonucleic acid levels in human decidual stromal cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:680–686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Fata JE, Ho ATV, Leco KJ, Moorehead RA, Khoka R 2000 Cellular turnover and extracellular matrix remodelling in female reproductive tissues: functions of metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Cell Mol Life Sci 57:77–95[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Vu TH, Werb Z 2000 Matrix metalloproteinases: effectors of development and normal physiology. Gene Dev 14:2123–2133[Free Full Text]
  20. Raga F, Casan EM, Wen Y, Huang HY, Bonilla-Musoles F, Polan ML 1999 Independent regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), and TIMP-3 in human endometrial stromal cells by gonadotropin releasing hormone: implications in early human implantation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:636–642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Neill JD 2002 GnRH and GnRH receptor genes in the human genome. Endocrinology 143:737–743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Grundker C, Gunthert AR, Millar RP, Emons G 2002 Expression of gonadotropin releasing hormone II receptor in human endometrial and ovarian cancer cells and effects of GnRH II on tumor cell proliferation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1427–1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kang SK, Tai CJ, Nathwani PS, Leung PCK 2001 Differential regulation of two forms of gonadotropin-releasing hormone messenger ribonucleic acid in human granulosa-luteal cells. Endocrinology 142:182–192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ikeda M, Taga M, Kurogi K, Minaguchi H 1997 Gene expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, but not its receptor, in human endometrium and decidua. Mol Cell Endocrinol 135:165–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Huang HY, Raga F, Wen Y, Kruessel JS, Soong YK, Polan ML 2003 Interleukin-1ß regulation of gonadotropin releasing hormone messenger ribonucleic acid in cultured human endometrial stromal cells. Fertil Steril 79:399–406[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Takeuchi S, Futamura N, Minoura H, Toyoda N 1998 Possible direct effect of gonadotropin releasing hormone on human endometrium and decidua. Life Sci 62:1187–1194[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Millar R, Lowe S, Conklin D, Pawson A, Maudsley S, Troskie B, Ott T, Millar M, Lincoln G, Sellar R, Faurholm B, Scobie G, Kuestner R, Terasawa E, Katz A 2001 A novel mammalian receptor for the evolutionarily conserved type II GnRH receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9636–9641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. McArdle CA, Franklin J, Green L, Hislop JN 2002 Signalling, cycling and desensitization of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors. J Endocrinol 173:1–11[Abstract]
  29. Cheng KW, Leung PCK 2000 The expression, regulation and signal transduction pathways of the mammalian gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 78:1029–1052[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Shah BH, Soh WJ, Catt KJ 2003 Dependence of GnRH induced neuronal MAP kinase signaling on EGF receptor transactivation. J Biol Chem 278:2866–2875[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lockwood CJ, Krikun G, Runic R, Schwartz LB, Mesia AF, Schatz F 2000 Progestin-epidermal growth factor regulation of tissue factor expression during decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:297–301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lockwood CJ 2001 Regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 expression by interaction of epidermal growth factor with progestin during decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:798–905[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Johki PP, King A, Loke YW 1994 Reciprocal expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) and c-erbB2 by non-invasive and invasive human trophoblast populations. Cytokine 6:433–442[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Aboagye-Mathiesen G, Zdravkovic M, Toth FD, Ebbesen P 1997 Effects of human trophoblast-induced interferons on the expression of proto-oncogenes c-fms/CSF-1R, EGF-R and c-erbB2 in invasive and non-invasive trophoblast. Placenta 18:155–161[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. Liu, C. D. MacCalman, Y.-l. Wang, and P. C. K. Leung
Promotion of Human Trophoblasts Invasion by Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) I and GnRH II via Distinct Signaling Pathways
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2009; 23(7): 1014 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. C. Cavanagh, C. Dunk, M. Pampillo, J. M. Szereszewski, J. E. Taylor, C. Kahiri, V. Han, S. Lye, M. Bhattacharya, and A. V. Babwah
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-regulated chemokine expression in human placentation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): C17 - C27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H.-M. Wu, H.-S. Wang, H.-Y. Huang, Y.-K. Soong, C. D MacCalman, and P. C K Leung
GnRH signaling in intrauterine tissues
Reproduction, May 1, 2009; 137(5): 769 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. K. Cheng and P. C. K. Leung
Molecular Biology of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH)-I, GnRH-II, and Their Receptors in Humans
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2005; 26(2): 283 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
G S Harrison, M E Wierman, T M Nett, and L M Glode
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and its receptor in normal and malignant cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2004; 11(4): 725 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Ding, J. Xu, X. Luo, and N. Chegini
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone and Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Activate Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase/Extracellularly Regulated Kinase and Differentially Regulate Fibronectin, Type I Collagen, and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Expression in Leiomyoma and Myometrial Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5549 - 5557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
X. Luo, L. Ding, and N. Chegini
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone and TGF-{beta} activate MAP kinase and differentially regulate fibronectin expression in endometrial epithelial and stromal cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2004; 287(5): E991 - E1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. S. Kauffman and E. F. Rissman
A Critical Role for the Evolutionarily Conserved Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone II: Mediation of Energy Status and Female Sexual Behavior
Endocrinology, August 1, 2004; 145(8): 3639 - 3646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C.-S. Chou, A. G. Beristain, C. D. MacCalman, and P. C. K. Leung
Cellular Localization of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) I and GnRH II in First-Trimester Human Placenta and Decidua
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1459 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Leung, P. C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chou, C.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Leung, P. C. K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals