help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guerin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guerin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, M. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 8 3738-3746
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Action of Ciprofibrate in Type IIB Hyperlipoproteinemia: Modulation of the Atherogenic Lipoprotein Phenotype and Stimulation of High-Density Lipoprotein-Mediated Cellular Cholesterol Efflux

Maryse Guerin, Wilfried Le Goff, Eric Frisdal, Séverine Schneider, Dragana Milosavljevic, Eric Bruckert and M. John Chapman

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 551, Dyslipoproteinemia and Atherosclerosis (M.G., W.L.G., E.F., S.S., D.M., M.J.C.), and Service d’Endocrinologie-Métabolisme (E.B.), Hôpital de la Pitié, 75651 Paris, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Maryse Guerin, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité 551, Hôpital de la Pitié, Pavillon Benjamin Delessert, 83, Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France. E-mail: mguerin{at}infobiogen.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The effects of ciprofibrate (100 mg/d) on apolipoprotein (apo)B- and apoAI-containing lipoprotein subclasses, cholesteryl ester (CE) transfer protein activity, and plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated cellular cholesterol efflux were evaluated in 10 patients displaying type IIB hyperlipidemia. Plasma concentrations of large very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-1 (Sf 60–400) and of small VLDL-2 (Sf 20–60) were markedly diminished after fibrate treatment (-40%, P = 0.001; and -25%, P = 0.003, respectively). We observed a reduction (-17%; P = 0.005) in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels resulting from significant reductions in concentrations of dense LDL particles (-46%; P < 0.0001). Ciprofibrate induced elevation in plasma total HDL (+13%; P = 0.005) levels; such elevation occurred preferentially in HDL-3 (+22%; P = 0.009). Marked reduction in numbers of atherogenic apoB100-containing particle acceptors was associated with a 25% decrease (P < 0.02) in CE transfer protein-mediated CE transfer from HDL. Finally, a significant fibrate-mediated elevation (+13%; P = 0.01 compared with baseline) in the capacity of plasma from type IIB subjects to mediate free cholesterol efflux from scavenger receptor class B, type I-expressing Fu5AH hepatoma cells was observed. In conclusion, the action of ciprofibrate in type IIB dyslipidemia leads to preferential reduction in particle numbers of atherogenic VLDL-1, VLDL-2, and dense LDL and, concomitantly, to elevation in HDL-3 levels that are associated with stimulation of HDL-mediated cellular free cholesterol efflux through the scavenger receptor class B, type I receptor pathway.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AMONG THE ATHEROGENIC dyslipidemias, type IIB or mixed hyperlipoproteinemia is characterized by concomitant elevation of plasma triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels (1). This atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype features elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins [including very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), VLDL remnants, and intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL)], a predominance of small, dense LDL particles, and low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (2). Circulating VLDL particles are highly heterogeneous and can be separated into two major subpopulations: large, light triglyceride-rich VLDL-1 (Sf 60–400), and smaller, denser cholesteryl ester (CE)-rich VLDL-2 (Sf 20–60) (3). In the IIB phenotype, VLDL-1 particles accumulate in plasma and are preferentially converted into atherogenic dense LDL through an intravascular metabolic process primarily involving CE transfer protein (CETP), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and hepatic lipase (HL) (2, 4, 5, 6) (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Atherogenic type IIB hyperlipoproteinemia is characterized by elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (including VLDL, VLDL remnants, and IDL); a predominance of small, dense LDL particles; and low concentrations of HDL. Circulating VLDL particles are highly heterogeneous and can be separated into two major subpopulations: large, light triglyceride-rich VLDL-1 (Sf 60–400), and smaller, denser CE-rich VLDL-2 (Sf 20–60). In the IIB phenotype, VLDL-1 particles accumulate in plasma and are preferentially converted into atherogenic, dense LDL through a metabolic process primarily involving CETP, LPL, and HL.

 
Fibrates, including bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, fenofibrate, and gemfibrozil, are widely used in the treatment of atherogenic dyslipidemias. These drugs exert a marked lowering effect (up to 60% less) on plasma triglyceride and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein levels but display lesser effects (up to 15% less) on plasma cholesterol concentrations (7). Moreover, fibrate treatment results in both quantitative and qualitative normalization of the atherogenic dense LDL particle profile characteristic of type IIB hyperlipoproteinemia. Indeed, fibrate therapy induces a shift in the peak of the density profile from small, dense LDL toward larger, buoyant LDL receptor-active LDL particles, typical of normolipidemic subjects (8, 9, 10, 11). Among triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles, fibrates preferentially reduce circulating levels of large VLDL-1, with lesser effect on smaller VLDL-2 (12, 13). Finally, fibrates induce elevation in HDL-cholesterol concentrations (up to 2-fold), with concomitant increase in plasma levels of apolipoprotein (apo)AI and apoAII (14).

The past decade afforded new insight into the mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Fibrates are agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-{alpha}, specific transcription factors belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Activation of PPAR-{alpha} by fibrates in tissues corresponding to major sites of fatty acid metabolism, such as the liver, adipose tissue, and macrophage, modulate the expression of several key genes encoding proteins involved in lipid metabolism. Indeed, fibrates induce up-regulation of genes encoding apoAI and apoAII in the liver (15, 16). Equally, activation of PPAR-{alpha} by fibrates induces hepatic expression of LPL and thus enhances intravascular lipolysis of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles (17). More recently, it has been demonstrated that the expression of the CLA1 gene in human monocyte-macrophages can be induced by fibrate-activated PPAR-{alpha} (18). Because the scavenger receptor class B, type I (SR-BI)/CLA-1 receptor is involved not only in HDL-mediated removal of cholesterol from peripheral cells but also in hepatic cholesterol uptake from HDL, fibrates may enhance both cellular cholesterol efflux and the reverse cholesterol transport pathway. In parallel, fibrates also induce 1) hepatic fatty acid uptake and ß- oxidation, resulting in reduction in triglyceride synthesis and production of VLDL by the liver (19); and 2) reduction in CE transfer from HDL to atherogenic VLDL, IDL, and LDL as a consequence of reduction in apoB-containing lipoprotein acceptors. This reduction thereby results in the normalization of intravascular CETP-mediated remodeling of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles and enhancing their removal from plasma (10, 12).

In the present study, we evaluated the effect of a potent fibrate, ciprofibrate, on the plasma profile of atherogenic apoB-containing lipoprotein subspecies and on apoAI-containing HDL subspecies; on CETP-mediated CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins; and on plasma-mediated cellular cholesterol efflux in 10 patients presenting with the atherogenic IIB phenotype. The action of ciprofibrate resulted in 1) marked reduction of plasma VLDL-1, VLDL-2, and dense LDL levels, including a shift of the dense LDL subclass profile to more buoyant particles with attenuation of the atherogenic lipoprotein profile; 2) reduction of CETP-mediated CE transfer from HDL, primarily involving CE transfer from HDL to VLDL-1 and VLDL-2; and 3) stimulation of HDL-mediated cellular free cholesterol efflux through the cellular SR-BI receptor pathway.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and blood samples

Ten males (ages, 32–50 yr; mean, 40 ± 6 yr) who displayed the type IIB phenotype typical of combined or mixed hyperlipidemia, i.e. fasting plasma levels of cholesterol at least 6.0 mmol/liter; triglycerides at least 1.70 mmol/liter; and apoB at least 140 mg/dl, were selected for the study (20). All subjects exhibited levels of lipoprotein(a) less than 50 mg/dl (mean, 15 ± 5 mg/dl). Patients were excluded if they displayed dysbetalipoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus, secondary causes of hyperlipidemia such as hypothyroidism, renal impairment or nephrotic syndrome, or known liver or muscle disease. Other exclusion criteria included uncontrolled hypertension or any major cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, severe or unstable angina pectoris, angioplasty, or cardiovascular surgery). None of the subjects was obese (body mass index < 30 kg/m2). Patients had ceased taking lipid-lowering drugs and had signed an informed consent form 6 wk before active treatment. The 6-wk period before treatment corresponded to a placebo period involving dietary stabilization (American Heart Association, step 1 diet). At wk 0, subjects started a 6-wk active period of treatment during which they received 100 mg/d ciprofibrate in capsule form before dinner. All patients tolerated the drug well, without any dropout. Blood samples (50 ml) were obtained by venipuncture of the brachial vein after an overnight fast at the time of inclusion into the study and after 6 wk of ciprofibrate (100 mg/d) treatment. Blood was collected in sterile EDTA-containing tubes (final concentration, 1 mg/ml), and plasma was immediately separated from blood cells by low-speed centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 20 min at 4 C.

The study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles set forth in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol and amendment were reviewed and approved by an Ethics Committee and met national institutional requirements.

Lipid and protein analyses

The lipid content of plasma and isolated lipoprotein fractions were quantified enzymatically, using Boehringer Mannheim kits (Meylan, France), for total cholesterol (TC) and free cholesterol (FC). CE mass was calculated as (TC - FC) x 1.67 and thus represents the sum of the esterified cholesterol and fatty acid moieties (21). Bio-Mérieux kits (Marcy-l’Etoile, France) were used for determination of triglycerides and phospholipids. The bicinchoninic acid assay reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL) was used for protein quantification. Lipoprotein mass was calculated as the sum of the mass of the individual lipid and protein components for each lipoprotein fraction. Plasma LDL-cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Plasma apoAI and apoB concentrations were determined by immunodiffusion using commercial gels (Sebia, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France).

Isolation of plasma lipoprotein subfractions

Subfractions of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, i.e. VLDL-1 (Sf 60–400), VLDL-2 (Sf 20–60), and IDL (Sf 12–20), were isolated from plasma (2 ml) by cumulative flotation after nonequilibrium density-gradient ultracentrifugation using a Beckman SW41 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) (12). LDL and HDL subfractions were isolated from plasma (3 ml) by isopycnic density gradient ultracentrifugation at 40,000 rpm for 44 h at 15 C by minor modification of the method of Chapman et al. (21), as previously described (6). With this procedure, LDL were separated into five LDL subfractions (LDL-1, d 1.019–1.023 g/ml; LDL-2, d 1.023–1.029 g/ml; LDL-3, d 1.029–1.039 g/ml; LDL-4, d 1.039–1.050 g/ml; and LDL-5, d 1.050–1.063 g/ml) and five HDL subfractions (HDL-2b, d 1.063–1.091 g/ml; HDL-2a, d 1.091–1.110 g/ml; HDL-3a, d 1.110–1.133 g/ml; HDL-3b, d 1.133–1.156 g/ml; and HDL-3c, d 1.156–1.179 g/ml). After centrifugation, all lipoprotein subfractions were collected from the meniscus of the tube downward by aspiration with a precision micropipette (Gilson, Villier Le Bel, France) in aliquots of 0.8 ml, with the exception of the HDL-2b subfraction that was collected in an aliquot of 1.2 ml.

Determination of CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins

Determination of CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins was assayed by modification of the method of Guérin et al. (22), which exclusively involves physiological CE transfer between endogenous lipoprotein donor and acceptor particles in plasma from each patient (22). Radiolabeled HDL were obtained from the d > 1.063 g/ml fraction of each patient’s plasma, as previously described (22). CE transfer was determined after incubation of whole plasma from individual subjects at 37 C or 0 C for 3 h in the presence of radiolabeled HDL (equivalent to 1% of the total HDL-CE mass present in 1 ml of each subject’s plasma) and iodoacetamide (final concentration, 1.5 mmol/liter). After incubation, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, i.e. VLDL-1, VLDL-2, and IDL, were isolated by ultracentrifugation, as described above. The total LDL (d 1.019–1.063 g/ml) and HDL (d > 1.063 g/ml) fractions were subsequently isolated by ultracentrifugation at 45,000 rpm for 24 h. The radioactive CE content of each isolated lipoprotein fraction was quantified by liquid scintillation counting. The rate of CE transfer was calculated from the known specific radioactivity of radiolabeled HDL-CE after its addition to plasma and is expressed in micrograms of CE transferred per hour per milliliter plasma (22).

Free cholesterol efflux from Fu5AH rat hepatoma cells

The capacity of each plasma sample to facilitate cellular cholesterol efflux from rat Fu5AH hepatoma cells was assayed according to the method of de la Llera Moya et al. (23). This experimental system has been validated as a model for efflux from cells of peripheral tissues via the SR-BI receptor (24). Briefly, cells were maintained in Eagle’s MEM containing 5% newborn calf serum and plated on 2.4-cm multiwell plates using 2 ml/well, i.e. 40,000 Fu5AH cells per well. Two days after plating, cellular cholesterol was labeled by incubation for 48 h with [3H]cholesterol (1 µCi/well). To allow equilibration of the label, the cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated for 24 h in MEM containing 0.5% BSA. Plated cells were subsequently incubated at 37 C, with 5% plasma diluted with MEM or with a 5% dilution of a d > 1.063 g/ml fraction depleted in apoB-containing lipoproteins (isolated from plasma after centrifugation at 40,000 rpm for 24 h at 15 C), or with a 5% dilution of a d > 1.125 g/ml fraction depleted in HDL-2 particles (isolated from the d > 1.063 g/ml fraction by ultracentrifugation at 40,000 rpm for 48 h at 15 C). After 4 h of incubation, the medium was collected, and the labeled cell cholesterol released was measured in an aliquot of the medium by liquid scintillation counting (Rackbeta 1209, Wallac, Turku, Finland). Triplicate wells of cells were also incubated with cholesterol acceptor-free medium to measure background (nonacceptor-mediated) cholesterol efflux. Before the start of the cholesterol efflux assay, a multiwell plate of cells was washed two times with PBS; cellular lipids were extracted by isopropanol; and cell radioactivity at time zero was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Cholesterol efflux (expressed as a percentage) was calculated as the amount of the label recovered in the medium divided by the total label in the cells at time zero. The background cholesterol efflux obtained in the absence of any acceptor (<2%) was subtracted from the efflux values obtained with the test samples.

Free cholesterol efflux from J774 mouse macrophage cells

The capacity of each plasma sample to facilitate cellular cholesterol efflux was equally determined in vitro with mouse J774 macrophage-like cells, which express ATP-binding cassette transporter-1 (ABCA1) at high levels, by the method of Sakr et al. (25). The J774 mouse macrophage cell system expresses SR-BI at very low levels (26). Briefly, cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and containing 1% L-glutamine and 0.75% penicillin-streptomycin. For efflux experiments, cells in DMEM containing 10% FBS were plated on 2.4-cm multiwell plates using 2 ml/well (100,000 cells per well). Three days after plating, cellular cholesterol was labeled by incubation of the cells for 24 h with [3H]cholesterol (1 µCi/well) in the culture media containing 2.5% FBS. To allow equilibration of the label among the various pools of cell cholesterol, cells were washed two times with PBS and incubated for 24 h in FBS-free culture medium containing 0.2% BSA. After this equilibration period, cells were washed with PBS and then incubated for 24 h in FBS-free culture medium with or without 0.2 mmol/liter 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)-cAMP. 8-(4-Chlorophenylthio)-cAMP was dissolved in distilled water at 50 mmol/liter and stored at -20 C. At the end of the pretreatment period with cAMP, cells were washed with PBS and incubated for 24 h with 1 ml of culture medium containing 2.5% or 5% plasma samples. After incubation, the medium was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min to remove floating cells and counted by liquid scintillation counting. Triplicate wells of cells were also incubated with cholesterol acceptor-free medium to measure background (nonacceptor-mediated) cholesterol efflux. Before the start of the cholesterol efflux assay, a multiwell plate of control or treated cells was washed with PBS, and cell radioactivity at time zero was measured by liquid scintillation counting. Cholesterol efflux was calculated as the amount of the label recovered in the medium divided by the total label in the cells at time zero and expressed as a percentage. The background cholesterol efflux obtained in the absence of any acceptor (<3%) was subtracted from the efflux values obtained with the test samples.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as means ± SEM. The effects of ciprofibrate on plasma lipid levels, the plasma concentrations of lipoprotein subfractions, CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins, and cellular free cholesterol efflux from cells were determined by comparing these parameters at the time of inclusion into the study with those after 6 wk of drug therapy by ANOVA, using Student’s paired t test. The level of statistical significance was taken as P < 0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of ciprofibrate on plasma lipid and apolipoprotein levels

Plasma lipid and apolipoprotein levels before and 6 wk after ciprofibrate treatment at doses of 100 mg/d in type IIB patients (n = 10) are presented in Table 1Go. At baseline, all subjects displayed plasma lipid and apoB levels characteristic of the IIB phenotype, as defined in Patients and Methods. After fibrate therapy, we observed significant reductions in both plasma total cholesterol (-20%; P = 0.002) and triglyceride (-45%; P = 0.003) levels. In addition, drug therapy significantly lowered plasma VLDL-cholesterol (-42%; P = 0.007), LDL-cholesterol (-20%; P = 0.002), and apoB (-26%; P = 0.001) concentrations. Moreover, no significant changes in HDL-cholesterol or apoAI concentrations were detected in ciprofibrate-treated patients, although there was an overall trend toward increase in both HDL-cholesterol and apoAI levels (Table 1Go). Nonetheless, total HDL mass was increased (see below). Interestingly, patients presenting the IIB phenotype displayed subnormal levels of HDL-cholesterol (0.96 ± 0.08 mmol/liter) compared with normolipidemic subjects (1.37 ± 0.05 mmol/liter) of similar age and sex (27).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Effect of ciprofibrate on plasma lipid and apolipoprotein levels in type IIB patients

 
Effects of ciprofibrate on plasma lipoprotein mass distribution

A marked mean reduction (-25%; P = 0.0006) in total plasma triglyceride-rich apoB-containing lipoprotein concentrations (VLDL-1 + VLDL-2 + IDL) was observed in type IIB patients (324 ± 17 and 243 ± 10 mg/dl before and after ciprofibrate treatment, respectively). Plasma VLDL-1 concentrations were significantly lowered by 40% (P = 0.001) after ciprofibrate therapy (145 ± 13 and 87 ± 11 mg/dl before and after ciprofibrate, respectively). In addition, a reduction of 25% (P = 0.003) was seen in plasma VLDL-2 (112 ± 11 and 85 ± 7 mg/dl before and after ciprofibrate, respectively). By contrast, IDL levels were not significantly influenced by fibrate therapy (67 ± 6 and 72 ± 4 mg/dl before and after treatment, respectively).

On fibrate treatment, mean plasma LDL concentration was reduced by 17% (P = 0.005) (502 ± 16 and 418 ± 24 mg/dl before and after treatment, respectively). The density distribution of the mass of LDL subspecies (Fig. 2Go) revealed that dense LDL subfractions (LDL-4 and LDL-5) predominated in IIB patients before treatment, accounting for 51% of total LDL mass, whereas larger, lighter LDL particles of intermediate density (LDL-3) represented a minor component (27%) of the LDL mass profile. After fibrate treatment, the LDL profile was normalized, and peak density shifted toward the more buoyant, CE-rich LDL-3 subfraction. Indeed, we observed a significant increase in both the mean plasma concentration (+27%; P = 0.04) and the relative proportion (+41%; P < 0.0001) of LDL-3; concomitantly, significant reductions in plasma levels of both LDL-4 (-46%; P < 0.0001) and LDL-5 (-46%; P < 0.0001) and in the relative proportion of dense LDL subfractions (LDL-4 + LDL-5, -34%; P < 0.0001) were found.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Density profile of LDL subfraction mass in type IIB subjects (n = 10) before (•) and after ({circ}) a 6-wk period of ciprofibrate (100 mg/d) treatment. Values are means ± SEM. *, P < 0.05; and ***, P < 0.0005 vs. before treatment.

 
The total HDL mass concentration (expressed as chemical mass of lipids and protein) significantly increased (+13%; P = 0.05) as a consequence of fibrate treatment (286 ± 7 and 323 ± 13 mg/dl before and after ciprofibrate, respectively). The effects of this lipid-modulating drug on particle subfractions isolated within the HDL density range are shown in Fig. 3Go. Interestingly, no significant variations in plasma HDL-2 levels were observed in subjects taking drug therapy (125 ± 8 and 127 ± 12 mg/dl before and after fibrate, respectively), whereas fibrate treatment induced significant elevation (+22%; P = 0.009) in HDL-3 levels. Moreover, when individual HDL particle subfractions were considered, we detected a significant increase in HDL-3a (+13%; P < 0.02), HDL-3b (+22%; P < 0.02), and HDL-3c (+48%; P < 0.02) concentrations.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Plasma concentrations of HDL subfractions in type IIB subjects (n = 10) before ({blacksquare}) and after ({square}) a 6-wk period of ciprofibrate treatment (100 mg/d). Values are means ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. before treatment.

 
Effects of ciprofibrate on CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins

Table 2Go shows the effect of ciprofibrate on the transfer rate of CEs from HDL to individual apoB-containing lipoproteins in the plasma of type IIB patients. After fibrate treatment with ciprofibrate at 100 mg/d, the mean rate of transfer of CEs from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins was significantly reduced (-25%; P = 0.017). Such marked reduction in plasma CETP activity resulted primarily from a net decrease in the rate of transfer of CE from HDL to triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (-31%; P = 0.03) and more specifically to VLDL-1 (-44%; P = 0.02) and VLDL-2 (-29%; P < 0.03), whereas rates of CE transfer from HDL to IDL were not significantly modified by drug therapy. When the rate of CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins is expressed relative to plasma lipoprotein mass concentration, the relative capacity of each triglyceride-rich lipoprotein subfraction to accept CEs from HDL can be estimated. In type IIB subjects, IDL particles displayed a significantly higher capacity to accept CEs from HDL (10.6 ± 0.9 µg CE transferred/h·mg lipoprotein mass) in comparison with that of VLDL-1 (7.6 ± 0.9 µg CE transferred/h·mg lipoprotein mass; P = 0.04) and VLDL-2 (7.2 ± 0.8 µg CE transferred/h·mg lipoprotein mass; P = 0.01). Finally, ciprofibrate therapy did not modify the relative capacity of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein subfractions to accept CEs from HDL, suggesting that fibrate-mediated reduction in CE transfer occurs as a result of a decrease in lipoprotein particle acceptor number rather than as a change in CE acceptor capacity per particle.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Effect of ciprofibrate on the rates of CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins in type IIB patients

 
Effect of fibrate therapy on cellular efflux of cholesterol to plasma from type IIB patients

To determine whether ciprofibrate-mediated modifications in the quantitative and qualitative profile of plasma lipoprotein particles might influence cellular free cholesterol efflux, we measured the capacity of whole plasma from each type IIB patient before and after fibrate therapy to mediate cholesterol efflux from cultured rat Fu5AH hepatoma cells expressing high levels of SR-BI (23). Using 20-fold diluted plasma in triplicate assays, a significant elevation (+13%; P = 0.01) in the capacity of plasma from type IIB subjects to mediate free cholesterol efflux from hepatoma cells was observed after ciprofibrate treatment (Fig. 4AGo). In parallel, we determined the capacity of the apoB-containing lipoprotein-deficient d > 1.063 g/ml fraction, isolated from type IIB plasmas before and after fibrate therapy to mediate cholesterol efflux from Fu5AH cells. Interestingly, the d > 1.063 g/ml fraction isolated from plasmas of fibrate-treated type IIB subjects displayed a significantly higher capacity (+22%; P = 0.01) compared with baseline to mediate cholesterol efflux from rat hepatoma cells. In addition, the d > 1.125 g/ml fraction (from which both apoB-containing lipoproteins and HDL-2 particles had been removed) isolated from plasmas of fibrate-treated type IIB subjects displayed a significantly higher efflux capacity (+16%; P = 0.006) compared with those isolated from plasmas of nontreated patients. Therefore, part of the increased efflux capacity of the HDL-3-containing d > 1.063 g/ml fraction is associated with the d > 1.125 g/ml fraction.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Free cholesterol efflux from Fu5AH rat hepatoma cells (A) and from J774 mouse macrophage cells (B). Cholesterol efflux was determined after 4-h incubation in the presence of a 20-fold or 40-fold dilution of plasma from type IIB hyperlipidemic subjects (n = 10) before ({blacksquare}) and after ({square}) a 6-wk period of fibrate treatment (100 mg/d), or with a 40-fold dilution of a d > 1.063 g/ml fraction depleted in apoB-containing lipoproteins, or with a 40-fold dilution of a HDL-2-depleted d > 1.125 g/ml fraction isolated from plasmas of treated and nontreated type IIB subjects. Cholesterol efflux from J774 cells was determined using cells pretreated with cAMP and control cells, as described in Patients and Methods. Values are means ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 vs. before treatment.

 
As shown in Fig. 4BGo, using 20-fold or 40-fold diluted plasma in triplicate assays, plasma-mediated free cholesterol efflux from ABCA1-expressing J774 mouse macrophage cells was not significantly modified by fibrate therapy. Pretreatment of the cells with cAMP markedly increased cholesterol efflux to plasma (at least +40%); nonetheless, no significant changes in the capacity of plasma from type IIB subjects to mediate free cholesterol efflux via the ABCA1 transporter was observed after ciprofibrate treatment.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
For the first time, ciprofibrate, a potent PPAR-{alpha} agonist, has been shown not only to induce preferential reduction in atherogenic apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses (i.e. large VLDL-1, small VLDL-2, and dense LDL subspecies) and in CETP-mediated CE transfer from HDL to VLDL-1 and VLDL-2 subfractions in type IIB hyperlipoproteinemia, but also to induce significant elevation in antiatherogenic HDL-3 levels; this effect occurred concomitantly with an increase in cellular free cholesterol efflux to the HDL-3 subfraction (d > 1.125 g/ml) mediated by the SR-BI receptor in rat hepatoma cells. Our findings on ciprofibrate action are consistent with those previously reported for reduction in plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels (-20% and -45%, respectively) in atherogenic hyperlipoproteinemia (28, 29). Equally, triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (VLDL-1 + VLDL-2 + IDL) levels were significantly reduced (-25%) on drug administration. Such reduction primarily involved major decrements in both VLDL-1 (-40%) and VLDL-2 (-25%) subfractions, whereas no significant effect of ciprofibrate was detected on plasma levels of IDL particles. Such a differential impact of ciprofibrate on individual triglyceride-rich lipoprotein subspecies has been previously observed with other potent fibrates (12, 13).

Several studies, including the prospective Québec Cardiovascular Study (30), have demonstrated that elevated levels of small, dense LDL (>100 mg/dl) are intimately associated with elevated risk for the development of premature coronary artery disease. In the present study, the LDL subclass profile, in which small dense LDL predominated at baseline, was progressively normalized by ciprofibrate toward an intermediate pattern in which the peak corresponded to a predominance of large, buoyant LDL particles. Ciprofibrate qualitatively normalized the atherogenic, dense LDL profile characteristic of the IIB phenotype by specifically reducing plasma levels of dense LDL subfractions (LDL-4 and LDL-5, -46%) and increasing those of intermediate LDL subspecies (LDL-3, +27%) of high receptor affinity (11). These findings are entirely consistent with previous observations of the impact of ciprofibrate therapy on LDL particle profile (9).

Despite a slight but significant increase in total HDL mass (+13%; P = 0.05) as determined by chemical analysis, plasma HDL-cholesterol and apoAI levels were not significantly modified by ciprofibrate but showed a trend toward elevation (+14% and +5%, respectively; Table 1Go). This observation was accounted for by fibrate-induced modification in HDL subspecies profile in which levels of individual cholesterol-poor HDL-3 subfractions (HDL-3a, HDL-3b, and HDL-3c) were significantly increased (+13%, +22%, and +48%, respectively), whereas no effect of ciprofibrate was detected on CE-rich, large HDL-2 subfraction levels (Fig. 3Go). The impact of ciprofibrate on HDL particle profile presently observed in type IIB hyperlipoproteinemia is in agreement with those previously described for two other fibric acid derivatives, bezafibrate and gemfibrozil (12). The elevation in plasma HDL level typically observed during fibrate therapy has been frequently attributed to LPL activity, a key determinant of plasma HDL concentration, as a result of the sequestration of surface fragments from triglyceride-rich lipoprotein to the HDL pool (31). Indeed, fibrates can induce hepatic LPL gene expression through the activation of PPAR-{alpha} (32). In agreement with a previous report (33), ciprofibrate induced elevation in postheparin LPL activity by approximately 20% (data not shown). In addition, we observed a significant reduction (-25%) in plasma CETP-mediated CE transfer from HDL to apoB-containing lipoproteins. It is well established that CETP is actively involved in the intravascular remodeling of HDL particles. Indeed, under certain conditions, CETP can induce the formation of small HDL particles at the expense of larger HDL (34). The ciprofibrate-induced reduction in plasma CETP activity might therefore be associated with a decrease in circulating levels of small HDL particles. However, because there is an inverse relationship between HDL-2 levels and HL activity (35), both LPL and HL might have opposing effects to CETP on plasma HDL concentration and particle profile. Thus, it has been demonstrated that HL can convert large triglyceride-rich HDL into smaller particles (36). Moreover, elevation in HL activity after ciprofibrate treatment has been reported (33), and a tendency to such an increase in HL activity was detected in the present study in the IIB phenotype (data not shown). Thus, the preferential increase in plasma HDL-3 subspecies might result from the combined action of both LPL and HL. These findings strongly suggest that the ciprofibrate-induced elevation in HL and LPL activity may counterbalance the drug-induced reduction of CETP activity on the intravascular remodeling of HDL particles.

To determine whether ciprofibrate-induced modification in the quantitative and qualitative features of plasma lipoprotein particles may influence their capacity to act as acceptors of cellular free cholesterol, we evaluated the capacity of type IIB hyperlipidemic plasma before and after ciprofibrate therapy to induce cholesterol efflux from Fu5AH rat hepatoma cells, which express high levels of the SR-BI receptor (24). Indeed, the SR-BI receptor pathway represents a critical component of the reverse cholesterol transport process, because this receptor is expressed at high levels in human monocyte-macrophages and lipid-loaded foam cells; indeed, the latter are key cellular components of lipid-rich, atherosclerotic plaques (18). Using the Fu5AH cell system in which cholesterol efflux occurs primarily via SR-BI receptors (37), we observed a significant increase (+13%; P = 0.01) in the capacity of whole plasma from ciprofibrate-treated patients to remove cellular free cholesterol compared with the plasma of type IIB patients before treatment. Because the cellular cholesterol efflux capacity of plasma in the Fu5AH cell system is known to be highly sensitive to HDL-phospholipid concentrations (38), the elevated cholesterol efflux capacity of posttreatment plasma can be related to the fibrate-induced increase in HDL-3 levels. Indeed, the total HDL-3 fraction isolated from the plasma of ciprofibrate-treated patients displayed an elevated capacity (+16%) to mediate free cholesterol efflux compared with HDL-3 isolated from plasma of subjects at baseline (Fig. 4AGo). Various cell lines, such as J774 mouse macrophages, display an enhanced cholesterol efflux capacity to lipid-free/lipid-poor apolipoproteins, including apoAI, apoAIV, and apoE, when stimulated with cAMP (39). Pretreatment of J774 cells by cAMP enhances the expression of the ABCA1, and thus up-regulation of ABCA1 gene expression is associated with increase in lipid-poor apolipoprotein-mediated efflux of cholesterol. In the present study, we demonstrated that free cholesterol efflux mediated by plasma from type IIB patients before and after fibrate therapy was not influenced by up-regulated expression of the ABCA1 transporter, suggesting that ciprofibrate did not influence plasma levels of lipid-free/lipid-poor apolipoproteins. In addition and in contrast to previous reports (28), we did not observe a significant elevation in plasma apoAI levels after ciprofibrate therapy. This finding contrasts with studies on the regulation of hepatic apoAI gene expression, carried out in human apoAI transgenic mice, which demonstrated an induction of human apoAI by fibrates (40). Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that HDL particles, mainly HDL-3 subspecies, that are active in facilitating cholesterol efflux are preferentially formed and/or accumulate in type IIB hyperlipidemic plasma after ciprofibrate therapy, possibly as a result of the concerted actions of LPL, HL, and CETP, rather than as a result of an increase in the hepatic production of nascent apoAI-containing HDL particles or from intravascular remodeling of preexisting HDL particles. Because both SR-BI/-1 and ABCA1 transporter gene expression in human macrophages is induced by fibrate-activated PPAR-{alpha} (32), we cannot rule out the possibility that ciprofibrate therapy might stimulate cellular free cholesterol efflux from macrophages by this pathway in vivo.

The integrated action of ciprofibrate in atherogenic type IIB dyslipidemia is summarized in Fig. 5Go. Marked reduction in circulating levels (and particle numbers) of VLDL-1 and VLDL-2 of hepatic origin leads to correction of the dense LDL profile, with normalization of the intravascular remodeling cascade of apoB-containing particles (4, 5, 6, 13); reduced CETP-mediated CE transfer from HDL and increased LPL activity are integral features of such effects. Equally, preferential elevation in dense, CE-poor HDL-3 particle subclasses occurs as a result of increased LPL activity on triglyceride-rich particles and of increased hepatic production of apoAI and apoAII; such particles enhance SR-BI-mediated cellular cholesterol efflux and, as a consequence, the reverse transport of cholesterol to the liver for excretion. Considered together, these actions of ciprofibrate contribute significantly to reduction in the atherosclerotic burden—and thus cardiovascular risk—in atherogenic type IIB hyperlipoproteinemia.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Integrated action of ciprofibrate in type IIB hyperlipoproteinemia. Ciprofibrate induces preferential reduction in atherogenic apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses, i.e. large VLDL-1, small VLDL-2, and dense LDL subspecies, and in CETP-mediated CE transfer from HDL to VLDL subfractions (VLDL-1 and VLDL-2) in type IIB hyperlipoproteinemia. Normalization of intravascular remodeling of LDL particles results in a shift from a dense to a buoyant LDL profile. In addition, this fibrate induced significant elevation in HDL-3 subfraction levels that occurred concomitantly with increase in the capacity of plasma from ciprofibrate-treated patients to mediate cellular free cholesterol efflux through the SR-BI receptor pathway in rat hepatoma cells.

 


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. G. Rothblat and Dr. N. Fournier for the kind gift of Fu5AH rat hepatoma cells and for stimulating discussions. We are indebted to Dr. L. Chatenet-Duchêne for definition of the clinical protocol and to Drs. M. Courtois, B. Chanu, and M. Farnier for patient recruitment and follow-up, and to Dr. Ph. Tcheng for continued support.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by INSERM, Sanofi-Synthelabo, and a Research Fellowship (to W.L.G.) from the French Ministry of Research and Technology.

Abbreviations: ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette transporter-1; apo, apolipoprotein; CE, cholesteryl ester; CETP, CE transfer protein; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HDL, high-density lipoprotein(s); HL, hepatic lipase; IDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein(s); LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; SR-BI, scavenger receptor class B, type I; VLDL, very low-density lipoprotein(s).

Received February 6, 2003.

Accepted April 14, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Arad Y, Ramakrishnan R, Ginsberg HN 1990 Lovastatin therapy reduces low density lipoprotein apoB levels in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia by reducing the production of apoB-containing lipoproteins: implications for the pathophysiology of apoB production. J Lipid Res 31:567–582[Abstract]
  2. Forster LF, Stewart G, Bedford D, Stewart JP, Rogers E, Shepherd J, Packard CJ, Caslake MJ 2002 Influence of atorvastatin and simvastatin on apolipoprotein B metabolism in moderate combined hyperlipidemic subjects with low VLDL and LDL fractional clearance rates. Atherosclerosis 164:129–145[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Packard CJ, Shepherd J 1997 Lipoprotein heterogeneity and apolipoprotein B metabolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:3542–3556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chapman MJ, Guerin M, Bruckert E 1998 Atherogenic, dense low-density lipoproteins. Pathophysiology and new therapeutic approaches. Eur Heart J 19(Suppl A):A24–A30
  5. Millar JS, Packard CJ 1998 Heterogeneity of apolipoprotein B-100-containing lipoproteins: what we have learnt from kinetic studies. Curr Opin Lipidol 9:197–202[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Guerin M, Lassel TS, Le Goff W, Farnier M, Chapman MJ 2000 Action of atorvastatin in combined hyperlipidemia: preferential reduction of cholesteryl ester transfer from HDL to VLDL1 particles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:189–197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. O’Connor P, Feely J, Shepherd J 1990 Lipid lowering drugs. BMJ 300:667–672
  8. Caslake MJ, Packard CJ, Gaw A, Murray E, Griffin BA, Vallance BD, Shepherd J 1993 Fenofibrate and LDL metabolic heterogeneity in hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb 13:702–711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bruckert E, Dejager S, Chapman MJ 1993 Ciprofibrate therapy normalises the atherogenic low-density lipoprotein subspecies profile in combined hyperlipidemia. Atherosclerosis 100:91–102[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Guerin M, Bruckert E, Dolphin PJ, Turpin G, Chapman MJ 1996 Fenofibrate reduces plasma cholesteryl ester transfer from HDL to VLDL and normalizes the atherogenic, dense LDL profile in combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16:763–772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nigon F, Lesnik P, Rouis M, Chapman MJ 1991 Discrete subspecies of human low density lipoproteins are heterogeneous in their interaction with the cellular LDL receptor. J Lipid Res 32:1741–1753[Abstract]
  12. Durrington PN, Mackness MI, Bhatnagar D, Julier K, Prais H, Arrol S, Morgan J, Wood GN 1998 Effects of two different fibric acid derivatives on lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor and paraoxonase activity in type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia. Atherosclerosis 138:217–225[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Milosavljevic D, Griglio S, Le Naour G, Chapman MJ 2001 Preferential reduction of very low density lipoprotein-1 particle number by fenofibrate in type IIB hyperlipidemia: consequences for lipid accumulation in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Atherosclerosis 155:251–260[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Kahri J, Vuorinen-Markkola H, Tilly-Kiesi M, Lahdenpera S, Taskinen MR 1993 Effect of gemfibrozil on high density lipoprotein subspecies in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Relations to lipolytic enzymes and to the cholesteryl ester transfer protein activity. Atherosclerosis 102:79–89[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Vu-Dac N, Schoonjans K, Laine B, Fruchart JC, Auwerx J, Staels B 1994 Negative regulation of the human apolipoprotein A-I promoter by fibrates can be attenuated by the interaction of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor with its response element. J Biol Chem 269:31012–31018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Vu-Dac N, Schoonjans K, Kosykh V, Dallongeville J, Fruchart JC, Staels B, Auwerx J 1995 Fibrates increase human apolipoprotein A-II expression through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J Clin Invest 96:741–750
  17. Schoonjans K, Peinado-Onsurbe J, Lefebvre AM, Heyman RA, Briggs M, Deeb S, Staels B, Auwerx J 1996 PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} activators direct a distinct tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene. EMBO J 15:5336–5348[Medline]
  18. Chinetti G, Gbaguidi FG, Griglio S, Mallat Z, Antonucci M, Poulain P, Chapman MJ, Fruchard JC, Tedgui A, Najib-Fruchart J, Staels B 2000 CLA-1/SR-BI is expressed in atherosclerotic lesion macrophages and regulated by activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Circulation 101:2411–2417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Martin G, Schoonjans K, Lefebvre AM, Staels B, Auwerx J 1997 Coordinate regulation of the expression of the fatty acid transport protein and acyl-CoA synthetase genes by PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} activators. J Biol Chem 272:28210–28217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Guerin M, Egger P, Soudant C, Le Goff W, van Tol A, Dupuis R, Chapman MJ 2002 Dose-dependent action of atorvastatin in type IIB hyperlipidemia: preferential and progressive reduction of atherogenic apoB-containing lipoprotein subclasses (VLDL-2, IDL, small dense LDL) and stimulation of cellular cholesterol efflux. Atherosclerosis 163:287–296[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Chapman MJ, Goldstein S, Lagrange D, Laplaud PM 1981 A density gradient ultracentrifugal procedure for the isolation of the major lipoprotein classes from human serum. J Lipid Res 22:339–358[Abstract]
  22. Guerin M, Dolphin PJ, Chapman MJ 1994 A new in vitro method for the simultaneous evaluation of cholesteryl ester exchange and mass transfer between HDL and apoB-containing lipoprotein subspecies. Identification of preferential cholesteryl ester acceptors in human plasma. Arterioscler Thromb 14:199–206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. de la Llera Moya M, Atger V, Paul JL, Fournier N, Moatti N, Giral P, Friday KE, Rothblat G 1994 A cell culture system for screening human serum for ability to promote cellular cholesterol efflux. Relations between serum components and efflux, esterification, and transfer. Arterioscler Thromb 14:1056–1065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rothblat GH, de la Llera-Moya M, Atger V, Kellner-Weibel G, Williams DL, Phillips MC 1999 Cell cholesterol efflux: integration of old and new observations provides new insights. J Lipid Res 40:781–796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sakr SW, Williams DL, Stoudt GW, Phillips MC, Rothblat GH 1999 Induction of cellular cholesterol efflux to lipid-free apolipoprotein A-I by cAMP. Biochim Biophys Acta 1438:85–98[Medline]
  26. Oram JF, Lawn RM, Garvin MR, Wade DP 2000 ABCA1 is the cAMP-inducible apolipoprotein receptor that mediates cholesterol secretion from macrophages. J Biol Chem 275:34508–34511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Guerin M, Egger P, Soudant C, Le Goff W, van Tol A, Dupuis R, Chapman MJ 2002 Cholesteryl ester flux from HDL to VLDL-1 is preferentially enhanced in type IIB hyperlipidemia in the postprandial state. J Lipid Res 43:1652–1660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Turpin G, Bruckert E 1996 Efficacy and safety of ciprofibrate in hyperlipoproteinaemias. Atherosclerosis 124(Suppl):S83–S87
  29. Aguilar-Salinas CA, Fanghanel-Salmon G, Meza E, Montes J, Gulias-Herrero A, Sanchez L, Monterrubio-Flores EA, Gonzales-Valdes H, Gomez Perez FJ 2001 Ciprofibrate versus gemfibrozil in the treatment of mixed hyperlipidemias: an open-label, multicenter study. Metabolism 50:729–733[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Lamarche B, Tchernof A, Moorjani S, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Lupien PJ, Despres JP 1997 Small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles as a predictor of the risk of ischemic heart disease in men. Prospective results from the Quebec Cardiovascular Study. Circulation 95:69–75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rader DJ, Maugeais C 2000 Genes influencing HDL metabolism: new perspectives and implications for atherosclerosis prevention. Mol Med Today 6:170–175[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Fruchart JC 2001 Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{alpha} activation and high-density lipoprotein metabolism. Am J Cardiol 88:24N–29N
  33. Desager JP, Horsmans Y, Vandenplas C, Harvengt C 1996 Pharmacodynamic activity of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase, and pharmacokinetic parameters measured in normolipidaemic subjects receiving ciprofibrate (100 or 200 mg/day) or micronised fenofibrate (200 mg/day) therapy for 23 days. Atherosclerosis 124(Suppl):S65–S73
  34. Newnham HH, Barter PJ 1992 Changes in particle size of high density lipoproteins during incubation with very low density lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lipoprotein lipase. Biochim Biophys Acta 1125:297–304[Medline]
  35. Carr MC, Ayyobi AF, Murdoch SJ, Deeb SS, Brunzell JD 2002 Contribution of hepatic lipase, lipoprotein lipase, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein to LDL and HDL heterogeneity in healthy women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22:667–673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Barter PJ, Chang LB, Newnham HH, Rye KA, Rajaram OV 1990 The interaction of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and unesterified fatty acids promotes a reduction in the particle size of high-density lipoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1045:81–89[Medline]
  37. de la Llera-Moya M, Rothblat GH, Connelly MA, Kellner-Weiber G, Sakr SW, Phillips MC, Williams DL 1999 Scavenger receptor BI (SR-BI) mediates free cholesterol flux independently of HDL tethering to the cell surface. J Lipid Res 40:575–580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Fournier N, Atger V, Paul JP, de la Llera Moya M, Rothblat G, Moatti N 1999 Fractional efflux and net change in cellular cholesterol content mediated by sera from mice expressing both human apolipoprotein AI and human lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase genes. Atherosclerosis 147:227–235[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Fournier N, Atger V, Paul JL, Sturm M, Duverger N, Rothblat G, Moatti N 2000 Human apoA-IV overexpression in transgenic mice induces cAMP-stimulated cholesterol efflux from J774 macrophages to whole serum. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:1283–1292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Berthou L, Duverger N, Emmanuel F, Langouet S, Auwerx J, Guillouzo A, Fruchart JC, Rubin E, Denefle P, Staels B, Branellec D 1996 Opposite regulation of human versus mouse apolipoprotein A-I by fibrates in human apolipoprotein A-I transgenic mice. J Clin Invest 97:2408–2416[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
C. C. van der Hoogt, W. de Haan, M. Westerterp, M. Hoekstra, G. M. Dallinga-Thie, J. A. Romijn, H. M. G. Princen, J. W. Jukema, L. M. Havekes, and P. C. N. Rensen
Fenofibrate increases HDL-cholesterol by reducing cholesteryl ester transfer protein expression
J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1763 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. H.E.M. Klerkx, K. E. Harchaoui, W. A. van der Steeg, S. M. Boekholdt, E. S.G. Stroes, J. J.P. Kastelein, and J. A. Kuivenhoven
Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) Inhibition Beyond Raising High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels: Pathways by Which Modulation of CETP Activity May Alter Atherogenesis
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(4): 706 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. D. Otvos, D. Collins, D. S. Freedman, I. Shalaurova, E. J. Schaefer, J. R. McNamara, H. E. Bloomfield, and S. J. Robins
Low-Density Lipoprotein and High-Density Lipoprotein Particle Subclasses Predict Coronary Events and Are Favorably Changed by Gemfibrozil Therapy in the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial
Circulation, March 28, 2006; 113(12): 1556 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
U. Edvardsson, A. Ljungberg, D. Linden, L. William-Olsson, H. Peilot-Sjogren, A. Ahnmark, and J. Oscarsson
PPAR{alpha} activation increases triglyceride mass and adipose differentiation-related protein in hepatocytes
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 329 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
E. Bruckert
Impact of lipid treatment on cardiovascular risk reduction: new therapeutic targets
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., November 1, 2005; 7(suppl_L): L16 - L20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
E. Frisdal, A. H.E.M. Klerkx, W. L. Goff, M. W.T. Tanck, J.-P. Lagarde, J. W. Jukema, J. J.P. Kastelein, M. J. Chapman, and M. Guerin
Functional interaction between -629C/A, -971G/A and -1337C/T polymorphisms in the CETP gene is a major determinant of promoter activity and plasma CETP concentration in the REGRESS Study
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 15, 2005; 14(18): 2607 - 2618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
R. M. Krauss
Lipids and Lipoproteins in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2004; 27(6): 1496 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guerin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guerin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, M. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS