help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De, P.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De, P.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, M. F.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 8 3567-3572
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Transsphenoidal Surgery for Acromegaly in Wales: Results Based on Stringent Criteria of Remission

P. De, D. A. Rees, N. Davies, R. John, J. Neal, R. G. Mills, J. Vafidis, J. S. Davies and M. F. Scanlon

Departments of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes (P.D., D.A.R., N.D., J.S.D., M.F.S.); Biochemistry (R.J.); Histopathology (J.N.); Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery (R.G.M.); and Neurosurgery (J.V.), University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. M. F. Scanlon, Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. E-mail: scanlonmf{at}cf.ac.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery (performed by three surgeons) in our center as initial therapy for acromegaly. We used a combination of modern, evidence-based remission criteria including mean day curve GH less than 2.5 µg/liter (5 mU/liter), a nadir GH less than 1.0 µg/liter (2 mU/liter) after an oral glucose tolerance test, and normal age-related IGF-I levels (where available).

Fifty-seven of 90 (63%) patients remained in remission after surgery. Seventy-nine percent of patients with microadenomas but only 56% of patients with macroadenomas achieved remission (P < 0.001). Eighty-six percent of patients with preoperative GH levels below 10 µg/liter (day profile or after oral glucose tolerance test) went into remission, compared with 51% of patients with GH levels above 25 µg/liter at diagnosis (P < 0.002). The remission rate was also related to the period of surgery that was significantly higher in 1998–2001 (76%; P < 0.05) compared with 1990–1997 (54%) and 1980–1989 (63%).

There were no recurrences or perioperative deaths. Meningitis occurred in 3% of patients, cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in 7%, and permanent diabetes insipidus in 15%. The proportion of patients who developed new anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies and panhypopituitarism was significantly less in the period 1998–2001 (P < 0.001) when compared with the periods from 1990–1997 and 1980–1989.

Transsphenoidal surgery is a safe and effective treatment for acromegaly, and our results compare favorably with those from published series. The presence of an intrasellar lesion and low preoperative GH levels is a good predictor of remission in the long term, but historically in our center this can only be achieved in a significant proportion of patients at the expense of some degree of hypopituitarism. However, surgical outcome in our center, including a reduced frequency of hypopituitarism, has improved significantly over time, coincident with the arrival of a dedicated pituitary neurosurgeon and the use of selective adenomectomy as the preferred surgical approach wherever possible.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACROMEGALY IS A chronic disease caused by GH excess due to a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma in more than 99% of cases (1). It is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality mainly from cardiorespiratory (2) and malignant disease, especially colonic cancer (3). Transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of choice in most specialized centers (4, 5, 6), and it offers the best chance of immediate normalization of GH levels in comparison to medical treatment and pituitary radiotherapy (7).

Various biochemical criteria for remission have been suggested in the past, including a random GH measurement less than 2.5 µg/liter (8, 9, 10, 11), mean GH value from a day curve less than 2.5 µg/liter (12, 13), nadir GH value after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) less than 1.0 µg/liter (10, 14, 15, 16), and a normal age-related IGF-I level (16). Published series have reported different remission rates based on application of the above varying criteria (10) and the skill and expertise of the surgeon involved. The importance of adequate treatment is highlighted by recent data indicating that lowering GH levels to less than 2.5 µg/liter reverses the premature mortality of acromegaly (9, 11), and an international consensus conference in 1999 suggested rigorous criteria for remission (cure) of acromegaly including normal age-related IGF-I and nadir GH levels during an OGTT of less than 1.0 µg/liter (16). This was further ratified in May 2000 by the Acromegaly Treatment Workshop in their consensus statement (17).

We have used these criteria to analyze the data from our center in 90 acromegalic patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery over a 20-yr period and compared results with those reported from other centers.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This is a retrospective analysis of all acromegalic patients referred to the combined neuroendocrine pituitary service at the University Hospital Wales, Cardiff between 1980 and 2001. Data were derived from our acromegaly database and case notes. The database holds information of all patients with acromegaly including symptoms and signs, preoperative imaging and laboratory results, operative findings, histology and immunohistochemistry, complications of surgery, clinical outcome, mean day GH profile and /or nadir GH values following OGTT and/or IGF-I results.

Data from a total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing surgery were reviewed. Eight patients underwent surgery at a different center to ours whereas data in two patients were incomplete and were excluded from the series, which ultimately comprised 90 patients who underwent pituitary surgery. Four patients died during the course of the follow-up but were included in the series because we had sufficient follow-up data from clinic visits. The mean age of patients was 61 (range, 29–86) yr, and there were 44 males and 46 females. The mean follow-up after surgery was 10.9 yr (range, 6 months to 20 yr).

The diagnosis of acromegaly was made clinically and biochemically after lack of suppression of GH to below 1.0 µg/liter during OGTT. Serum IGF-I levels were used in diagnosis and follow-up only since 1990 when the assay became available. All patients underwent preoperative assessment according to a standard protocol that included measurement of free T4, TSH, prolactin (PRL), LH, FSH, and testosterone or estradiol. The pituitary-adrenal axis was assessed by either a short ACTH stimulation test (short synacthen test; SST) or insulin tolerance testing (ITT) as appropriate.

All patients underwent pituitary computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Tumors were classified as microadenomas (diameter < 10 mm) and macroadenomas (diameter > 10 mm). Macroadenomas were further divided into intrasellar (IS) and extrasellar (ES), with ES macroadenomas showing evidence of extension into the suprasellar cistern or third ventricle or lateral invasion into the cavernous sinus. Where no tumor was visible on imaging, it was classed as a microadenoma. Immunohistochemical characteristics of tumors were available in 88 patients.

Surgical remission or cure involved fulfilling all of the following criteria (depending on the availability at the time): mean GH from a day curve (five-point day curve; samples collected at 0900, 1000, 1100, 1300, and 1500 h) less than 2.5 µg/liter, a nadir GH value after OGTT of less than 1.0 µg/liter, and a normal age-related IGF-I level.

Operations were performed by two ear, nose, and throat surgeons (A and B) and one neurosurgeon (C) over this period. Surgeon A operated between 1980 and 1989, surgeon B between 1990 and 1997, and surgeon C between 1998 and 2001. A total of 33 patients (36%) underwent total hypophysectomy, and 57 underwent selective adenomectomy.

Patients received peri- and postoperative iv antibiotics (surgeons A and B) and hydrocortisone. Basal and dynamic pituitary function testing including assessment of GH secretory status was performed in almost all patients at 4–6 wk postoperatively (in three patients, GH day curve measurements were performed within 1 wk of surgery). Pituitary function tests included measurements of PRL, thyroid, and gonadal function and ACTH reserve using the ITT (or SST where hypoglycemia was contraindicated). Pituitary hypothyroidism was diagnosed if serum T4 was low with an inappropriately low TSH. Low serum gonadotropins in the presence of low sex steroid levels was the basis for diagnosing hypogonadism. ACTH insufficiency was based on a subnormal cortisol response of less than 500 nmol/liter using ITT and 550 nmol/liter using SST. Diabetes insipidus (DI) was assessed, where necessary, using the standard water deprivation test. All patients who were deemed to be in remission underwent subsequent annual GH day profile and IGF-I measurements. In those with mean day curve GH levels greater than 2.5 µg/liter, further surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or medical therapy was considered. Appropriate written informed consent was obtained from all patients undergoing therapeutic procedures.

GH and IGF-I assays

Between 1980 and 1989, serum GH was measured using an in-house RIA, whereas between 1989 and 1999 it was measured using an immunoradiometric assay (IDS Ltd., Tyne and Wear, UK). From 1999, an automated two-site Nichols Advantage chemiluminescent immunoassay (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA) was used. The Nichols Advantage assay for GH has intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 4.8 and 5.8%, respectively, in assay midrange.

Serum IGF-I concentrations were measured between 1990 and 2001 using a RIA (Biosource, Nivelles, Belgium) and since 2001 using Nichols Advantage chemiluminescent immunoassay with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 5.2 and 5.7%, respectively, in assay midrange. For IGF-I measurements, normal ranges according to age were provided by the manufacturer.

Statistical analysis

The {chi}2 test was used to calculate outcome in relation to tumor size and to compare cure and complication rates between surgeons in different periods; the parametric t test was used on transformed data where appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS 11.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) statistical package.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A total of 61 (68%) patients had macroadenomas, and 29 (32%) had microadenomas. In 10 patients, no tumor was identified on radiology, and they were classified as microadenomas. Of the macroadenomas, 36 (59%) were intrasellar, whereas 25 (41%) had extrasellar extensions. The median preoperative GH level was 25 µg/liter (range, 3–220 µg/liter). Immunohistochemical data for seven major hormones (GH, PRL, ACTH, TSH, LH, FSH, and {alpha}-subunit of glycoprotein) in 86 (96%) patients showed that 44 (51%) were immunoreactive for GH alone, 37 (43%) for both GH and PRL, and a varying degree of mixed reactivity was observed in the remainder. There were no significant differences in the preoperative GH levels and remission rates based on the different immunohistochemical characteristics of the tumors. Twenty-eight of 44 (64%) of those that stained positive for GH were in remission, whereas 21 of 37 (57%) that were positive for both GH and PRL were in remission.

Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery

According to the criteria adopted in our series, 57 of 90 (63%) patients went into remission after surgery. The remaining 33 patients received medical therapy (dopamine agonists and/or somatostatin analog), and 31 underwent external beam radiotherapy in addition. Of those in remission after surgery, there has been no recurrence so far.

A mean postoperative GH day profile below 2.5 µg/liter was achieved in 63 of 90 (70%) patients, whereas a nadir GH value of less than 1.0 µg/liter after OGTT was achieved in 57 of 90 (63%) patients (Table 1Go). IGF-I measurements were available in only 37 patients preoperatively, and in 25 (68%) patients they were normalized after surgery (Table 1Go). In the 12 patients in which IGF-I levels did not normalize, there was a mean postoperative fall in IGF-I levels of 35% (range, 7–65%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Outcome of surgery according to criterion used to define remission

 
Remission rates for transsphenoidal surgery according to tumor size and year of operation are shown in Table 2Go. Twenty-three of 29 (79%) patients with microadenomas and 27 of 36 (75%) with IS macroadenomas were in remission, compared with 7 of 25 (28%) with ES macroadenomas. Overall, 50 of 65 (77%) patients with intrasellar adenomas (micro and macro) were in remission, indicating the relevance of both tumor size (P < 0.001) and intrasellar confinement (P < 0.002).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Remission rates1 of surgery for surgeons (A, B, C) according to tumor size and year of operation

 
Since 1998, one neurosurgeon has performed all pituitary surgery in our center. Remission rates have improved over time for both micro- and macroadenomas, with 100 and 69% remission for micro and macroadenomas, respectively, since 1998 compared with pre-1997 (71% for microadenomas and 47% for macroadenomas) and pre-1990 (76% for microadenomas and 54% for macroadenomas). Overall, a significantly greater number of transsphenoidal procedures resulted in remission in 1998–2001 (76%, P < 0.05) when compared with 1990–1997 (54%) and 1980–1989 (63%) as shown in Table 2Go. There was no change in the proportion of tumors in different size categories or in the preoperative GH levels over these years.

Table 3Go shows the remission rates after surgery in relation to tumor size and preoperative GH level. Success rate was inversely related to preoperative GH levels, with 18 of 21 (86%) patients presenting with GH levels less than 10 µg/liter achieving remission compared with 23 of 45 (51%) whose GH levels were greater than 25 µg/liter at diagnosis (P < 0.002).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Remission rates of surgery according to preoperative GH levels and tumor size

 
Complications of transsphenoidal surgery

During follow-up four patients died, but none of the deaths were related to or occurred in the immediate postoperative period (within 1 month of surgery). Table 4Go shows the postoperative complications in our patients relating to the period of surgery. There were three documented cases of meningitis (3%) diagnosed by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination and treated successfully by antibiotics. Six patients had CSF rhinorrhoea (7%), and two required continuous lumbar drainage. One patient developed intracerebral and subdural hemorrhage after surgery requiring surgical drainage. DI occurred in 30 patients in the immediate postoperative period and was permanent in 14 (15%) patients requiring long-term desmopressin treatment. In 16 (17%) patients, DI was transient and lasted for a maximum period of 1 wk. One patient developed inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion and one had a cerebrovascular accident, whereas two patients developed deep venous thrombosis requiring anticoagulation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Postoperative complications of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly according to year of operation and surgeon (A, B, C)

 
Postoperative pituitary function

Thirty-three of 90 (37%) patients remained eupituitary after transsphenoidal surgery. Thirty-nine of 90 (43%) patients were rendered panhypopituitary; 22% (20 of 90) had evidence of new anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies, three had TSH (3%), seven had LH/FSH (8%), 15 had ACTH (17%), and 20 had GH (22%). The results are summarized in Table 5Go. The size of the tumor had no significant effect on the development of either anterior pituitary hormone deficiency or panhypopituitarism.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Postoperative new anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies and hypopituitarism according to year of operation and surgeon (A, B, C)

 
When the change in pituitary function was analyzed according to the year of operation and surgeon, the proportion of patients who developed new anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies and panhypopituitarism was significantly less in the period 1998–2001 (P < 0.001) when compared with the periods from 1990–1997 and 1980–1989.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Transsphenoidal surgery remains the treatment of choice for the majority of patients with acromegaly. Our data are in keeping with the reports of others that, in experienced hands, transsphenoidal surgery is a safe and effective first line treatment.

Meaningful comparison of data between centers has been difficult in the past because of variation in the selected criteria of cure or remission. These have been based on either single measures or various combinations of random/mean GH day profile levels (often with different cut-off values), nadir GH values after OGTT and IGF-I measurements (Table 6Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 6. Comparative results of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly in different centers

 
Most epidemiological data on morbidity and mortality from acromegaly are based on the mean of several GH values during a day profile. The definition of target GH levels has become more stringent over the years, and the achievement of a mean postoperative day curve GH value of less than 2.5 µg/liter restores mortality rates to those of the general population (9, 11, 18). In addition, Buchfelder et al. (14) and Stoffel-Wagner et al. (15) have demonstrated that a nadir GH level of less than 1.0 µg/liter during OGTT provides much better prognostic information than random GH measurements in determining remission of acromegaly. Although IGF-I levels correlate well with clinical activity of acromegaly (19), they have been thought insufficient alone in predicting the long-term benefits of surgery (20). This view was supported by Sheaves et al. (12), who favored a combination of a GH day profile and IGF-I levels in the follow-up of treated patients with acromegaly. Most recently, Giustina et al. (16) have provided good evidence that, in addition to a mean random GH level below 2.5 µg/liter, treatment goals should restore GH levels to less than 1.0 µg/liter during an OGTT and normalize age- and gender-related IGF-I levels. The timing of postoperative testing may also be important, and recent evidence from Kaltsas et al. (21) suggests that early assessment may be as effective as more traditional analyses in which formal testing of the GH axis is delayed until 1 month or more after surgery. They found no differences in remission rates assessed at 1–3 wk compared with more than 4 wk after surgery and propose that early measurement of IGF-I is prognostically useful. This is in contrast to others who have suggested that early postoperative analysis may be inaccurate (16).

We chose to define remission as achievement of a mean postoperative GH day curve less than 2.5 µg/liter, a nadir GH value after OGTT of less than 1.0 µg/liter, and a normal age-related IGF-I level, performed at 4–6 wk postoperatively. Using all of these stringent criteria, our overall remission rate was 63% which compares favorably with other similar series of 33% (8), 34% (21), 42% (12), 49% (10), 55% (22), 56% (23), 67% (24), 68% (13), and 70% (25). Indeed, compared with the most recent similar series of Kreutzer et al. (25), our long-term remission rates of 70, 63, and 68% are very similar to theirs of 68, 61, and 70%, respectively, when cure was defined by postoperative GH less than 2.5 µg/liter, nadir GH less than 1.0 µg/liter, and normal IGF-I, respectively.

The influence of tumor size and extrasellar extension on outcome is quite clearly borne out in our series with 79% of microadenomas (and 75% intrasellar macroadenomas) achieving remission, compared with 56% of macroadenomas (and only 28% extrasellar macroadenomas). This compares well with the published series so far, and only Ahmed et al. (13) have achieved a marginally better remission rate (60%) for macroadenomas compared with ours of 56% (Table 6Go). Therefore, our results, in keeping with many others, indicate that remission after surgery is dependent not only on tumor size but also on intrasellar confinement.

We have not had any relapses so far after a mean follow-up of nearly 11 yr. This is in contrast to most series in which reported relapse rates have varied between 1 and 10% as follows: 3%, Sheaves et al. (12); 4.3%, Ross and Wilson (26); 10%, Grisoli et al. (27); 6%, Osman et al. (10); 6%, Swearingen et al. (28); 7%, Abosch et al. (29); 7%, Ahmed et al. (13); and 1% each Laws et al. and Kreutzer et al. (24, 25), depending on the rigor of the follow-up analysis.

Kreutzer et al. (25) have shown lower remission rates for tumors with mixed GH/PRL immunostaining (50%) compared with those positive only for GH (62.5%). Our findings are similar with 58% remission rates for those with mixed GH/PRL immunostaining and 64% for tumors that stained exclusively for GH (statistically nonsignificant).

The importance of preoperative GH levels on optimal outcome was evident with an 86% remission rate in our patients with preoperative GH levels below 10 µg/liter compared with 51% when GH levels were greater than 25 µg/liter at diagnosis. This is consistent with previous reports (12, 13, 21, 23).

Our results suggest that transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly is a safe procedure with minimal complications. As in our series, there were no deaths related to surgery reported by others (12, 25, 26, 29). Complications directly related to surgery in our series showed somewhat higher CSF leak of 7% compared with the following: 2%, Sheaves et al. (12) and Ross and Wilson (26); 2%, Abosch et al. (29); and 1.7%, Kreutzer et al. (25). The incidence of meningitis has been reported at less than 2% in most series (23, 26, 29, 30). Our figure of 3% was slightly higher but less than the 8% incidence reported by Sheaves et al. (12). Fifteen percent of our patients developed permanent DI, which is higher than the 8% reported by Sheaves et al. (12), 2.6% by Ross and Wilson (26), 7.2% by Ahmed et al. (13), and 2% by Abosch et al. (29). The incidence of new anterior pituitary hormone deficiency of any axis developing postoperatively was 22% in our group of patients, which is comparable to Sheaves et al. (12) but higher than the 8% reported by Hardy and Somma (30) and 14% by Ahmed et al. (13). Only 37% of our patients remained eupituitary after surgery, which is much less than those of Hardy and Somma, 76% (30); and Sheaves et al., 73% (12). The reason for higher rates of CSF leak, permanent DI, and hypopituitarism in our series is probably due in part to the higher proportion of macroadenomas in our cohort (68%). Additionally, surgery involved total hypophysectomy in over one third of the patients and was a particular practice of surgeon A between 1980 and 1989.

Quite reasonably, it has been suggested that pituitary surgery should be undertaken by specialists to achieve better surgical outcomes (31, 32, 33). When analysis of outcomes is compared between surgeons in our center, it is clear that results have improved over time with enhanced remission and a reduction in the rates of hypopituitarism and complications. These advances cannot be accounted for by changes in tumor size or in preoperative GH levels because there were no significant differences in these parameters over these years. The improvements may, however, be attributable to better preoperative imaging and a change in surgical approach, with increased emphasis on selective procedures wherever possible. In addition, we speculate that some of the improvements may be related to the move in 1998 to a single surgeon operating on all patients with pituitary disease in our center. Others have reported similar findings (13, 31, 34, 35) and reinforce the need for centers to employ dedicated, experienced pituitary surgeons in treating all patients with acromegaly.

In conclusion, using stringent criteria of remission, our results compare well with similar series, although it is hoped that recent standardization of remission criteria will enable improved future comparison of surgical outcomes between different centers. Outcomes for macroadenomas, however, continue to be less than satisfactory, although with the advent and development of modern microsurgical techniques including endoscopy-assisted microsurgery, neuronavigation, and intraoperative hormone assays, operative success for acromegaly may continue to improve with further reductions in morbidity and mortality.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid; DI, diabetes insipidus; ES, extrasellar; IS, intrasellar; ITT, insulin tolerance test; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PRL, prolactin; SST, short synacthen test.

Received November 21, 2002.

Accepted April 16, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Melmed S 1990 Acromegaly. N Engl J Med 322:966–967[Medline]
  2. Wright AD, Hill DM, Lowy C, Fraser TR 1970 Mortality in acromegaly. Q J Med 39:1–16
  3. Jenkins PJ, Fairclough PD, Richards T, Lowe DG, Monson J, Grossman A, Wass JAH, Besser GM 1997 Acromegaly, colonic polyps and carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 47:17–22[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Laws ER 1994 Results of transsphenoidal microsurgical management of acromegaly. In: Wass JAH, ed. Treating acromegaly. Bristol, UK: Journal of Endocrinology Ltd.; 59–63
  5. Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Schott W, Buchfelder M 1994 Results of surgery in acromegaly. In: Wass JAH, ed. Treating acromegaly. Bristol, UK: Journal of Endocrinology Ltd.; 49–54
  6. Kendall-Taylor P, Osman IA, James RA, Chatterjee S, Mathias DB 1994 Outcome of surgery for acromegaly. In: Wass JAH, ed. Treating acromegaly. Bristol, UK: Journal of Endocrinology Ltd.; 65–68
  7. Barkan AL 1989 Acromegaly. Diagnosis and therapy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 18:277–310[Medline]
  8. Jenkins D, O’Brien I, Johnson A, Shakespear R, Sheppard MC, Stewart PM 1995 The Birmingham pituitary database: auditing the outcome of treatment of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 43:517–522[Medline]
  9. Bates AS, Van’t Hoff W, Jones JM, Clayton RN 1993 An audit of outcome of treatment in acromegaly. Q J Med 86:293–299
  10. Osman IA, James RA, Chatterjee S, Mathias D, Kendall-Taylor P 1994 Factors determining the long-term outcome of surgery for acromegaly. Q J Med 87:617–623
  11. Orme SM, McNally RJ, Cartwright RA, Belchetz PE 1998 Mortality and cancer incidence in acromegaly: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2730–2734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sheaves R, Jenkins P, Blackburn P, Huneidi AH, Afshar F, Medbak S, Grossman AB, Besser GM, Wass JA 1996 Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly using strict criteria for surgical cure. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:407–413[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ahmed S, Elsheikh M, Stratton IM, Page RCL, Adams CBT, Wass JAH 1999 Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly and its relationship to surgical experience. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 50:561–567[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Buchfelder M, Brockmeier S, Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Pichl J, Manzl M 1991 Recurrence following transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. Horm Res 35:113–118[Medline]
  15. Stoffel-Wagner B, Springer W, Bidlingmaier F, Klingmuller D 1997 A comparison of different methods for diagnosing acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46:531–537[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, Frohman L, Ho K, Veldhuis J, Wass J, Von Werder K, Melmed S 2000 Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:526–529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Melmed S, Casanuevva FF, Cavagnini F, Chanson P, Frohman L, Grossman A, Ho K, Kleinberg D, Lamberts S, Laws E, Lombardi G, Vance ML, Von Werder K, Wass J, Giustina A 2002 Guidelines for acromegaly management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4054–4058[Free Full Text]
  18. Rajasoorya C, Holdaway IM, Wrightson P, Scott DJ, Ibbertson HK 1994 Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 41:95–102[Medline]
  19. Freda PU, Post KD, Powell JS, Wardlaw SL 1998 Evaluation of disease status with sensitive measures of growth hormone secretion in 60 postoperative patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3808–3816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Arafah BM, Rosenzweig JL, Fenstermaker R, Salazar R, McBride CE, Selman W 1987 Value of growth hormone dynamics and somatomedin C (insulin-like growth factor-I) levels in predicting the long-term benefit after transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. J Lab Clin Med 109:346–354[Medline]
  21. Kaltsas GA, Isidori AM, Florakis D, Trainer PJ, Camacho-Hubner C, Afshar F, Sabin I, Jenkins JP, Chew SL, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB 2001 Predictors of the outcome of surgical treatment in acromegaly and the value of the mean growth hormone day curve in assessing postoperative disease activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1645–1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Losa M, Oeckler R, Schopohl J, Muller O, Alba-Lopez J, von Werder K 1989 Evaluation of selective transsphenoidal adenomectomy by endocrinological testing and somatomedin-C measurement in acromegaly. J Neurosurg 70:56–67
  23. Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Buchfelder M 1992 Surgical management of acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 21:669–692[Medline]
  24. Laws ER, Vance ML, Thapar K 2000 Pituitary surgery in the management of acromegaly. Horm Res 53(Suppl 3):71–75
  25. Kreutzer J, Vance ML, Lopes MB, Laws Jr ER 2001 Surgical management of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas: an outcome study using modern remission criteria. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4072–4077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ross DA, Wilson CB 1988 Results of transsphenoidal microsurgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma in a series of 214 patients. J Neurosurg 68:854–867[Medline]
  27. Grisoli F, Leclercq T, Jaquet P, Guibout M, Winteler JP, Hassoun J, Vincentelli F 1985 Transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly. Long-term results in 100 patients. Surg Neurol 23:513–519[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Swearingen B, Barker 2nd FG, Katznelson L, Biller BM, Grinspoon S, Klibanski A, Moayeri N, Black PM, Zervas NT 1998 Long-term mortality after transsphenoidal surgery and adjunctive therapy for acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3419–3426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Abosch A, Tyrrell JB, Lamborn KR, Hannegan LT, Applebury CB, Wilson CB 1998 Transsphenoidal microsurgery for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas: initial outcome and long-term results. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3411–3418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hardy J, Somma M 1979 Acromegaly: surgical treatment by transsphenoidal microsurgical removal of the pituitary adenoma. In: Tindall GT, Collins WF, eds. Clinical management of pituitary disorders. New York: Raven Press; 209–217
  31. Lissett CA, Peacey SR, Laing I, Tetlow L, Davis JR, Shalet SM 1998 The outcome of surgery for acromegaly: the need for a specialist pituitary surgeon for all types of growth hormone (GH) secreting adenoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 49:653–657[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Clayton RN, Stewart PM, Shalet SM, Wass JA 1999 Pituitary surgery for acromegaly. Should be done by specialists. Br Med J 319:588–589[Free Full Text]
  33. Wass JA, Turner HE, Adams CB 1999 The importance of locating a good pituitary surgeon. Pituitary 2:51–54[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Yamada S, Aiba T, Takada K, Ozawa Y, Shimizu T, Sawano S, Shishiba Y, Sano T 1996 Retrospective analysis of long-term surgical results in acromegaly: preoperative and postoperative factors predicting outcome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 45:291–298[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Gittoes NJ, Sheppard MC, Johnson AP, Stewart PM 1999 Outcome of surgery for acromegaly—the experience of a dedicated pituitary surgeon. Q J Med 92:741–745
  36. Wilson CB, Dempsey LC 1978 Transsphenoidal microsurgical removal of 250 pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 48:13–22[Medline]
  37. Roelfsema F, van Dulken H, Frolich M 1985 Long-term results of transsphenoidal pituitary microsurgery in 60 acromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 23:555–565[Medline]
  38. Lindholm J, Giwercman B, Giwercman A, Astrup J, Bjerre P, Skakkebaek NE 1987 Investigation of the criteria for assessing the outcome of treatment in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 27:553–562[Medline]
  39. Tindall GT, Oyesiku NM, Watts NB, Clark RV, Christy JH, Adams DA 1993 Transsphenoidal adenomectomy for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in acromegaly: outcome analysis and determinants of failure. J Neurosurg 78:205–215[Medline]
  40. Davis DH, Laws Jr ER, Ilstrup DM, Speed JK, Caruso M, Shaw EG, Abboud CF, Scheithauer BW, Root LM, Schleck C 1993 Results of surgical treatment for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 79:70–75[Medline]
  41. Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Buchfelder M 1997 Evidence supporting surgery as treatment of choice for acromegaly. J Endocrinol 155(Suppl 1):S53–S55
  42. Van’t Verlaat JW, Nortier JW, Hendricks MJ, Bosma NJ, Graamans K, Lubsen H, Vasen HF, Thijssen JH, Croughs RJ 1998 Transsphenoidal microsurgery as primary treatment in 25 acromegaly patients: results and follow-up. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 117:154–158



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Melmed, A. Colao, A. Barkan, M. Molitch, A. B. Grossman, D. Kleinberg, D. Clemmons, P. Chanson, E. Laws, J. Schlechte, et al.
Guidelines for Acromegaly Management: An Update
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 1509 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S Petersenn, M Buchfelder, M Reincke, C M Strasburger, H Franz, R Lohmann, H-J Quabbe, U Plockinger, and the Participants of the German Acromegaly Register
Results of surgical and somatostatin analog therapies and their combination in acromegaly: a retrospective analysis of the German Acromegaly Register
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 159(5): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Nachtigall, A. Delgado, B. Swearingen, H. Lee, R. Zerikly, and A. Klibanski
Changing Patterns in Diagnosis and Therapy of Acromegaly over Two Decades
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2035 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Bajuk Studen and A. Barkan
Assessment of the Magnitude of Growth Hormone Hypersecretion in Active Acromegaly: Reliability of Different Sampling Models
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 491 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Colao, R. Attanasio, R. Pivonello, P. Cappabianca, L. M. Cavallo, G. Lasio, A. Lodrini, G. Lombardi, and R. Cozzi
Partial Surgical Removal of Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Tumors Enhances the Response to Somatostatin Analogs in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 85 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
G M Besser, P Burman, and A F Daly
Predictors and rates of treatment-resistant tumor growth in acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 187 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
R. Fahlbusch, B. v Keller, O. Ganslandt, J. Kreutzer, and C. Nimsky
Transsphenoidal surgery in acromegaly investigated by intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 239 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Castinetti, D. Taieb, J.-M. Kuhn, P. Chanson, M. Tamura, P. Jaquet, B. Conte-Devolx, J. Regis, H. Dufour, and T. Brue
Outcome of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in 82 Patients with Acromegaly: Correlation with Initial Hypersecretion
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4483 - 4488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S.M. Shalet
Biochemical Monitoring of Disease Activity after Surgery for Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 492 - 494.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De, P.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De, P.
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, M. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals