help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Misrahi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Misrahi, M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 8 3491-3498
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society


CLINICAL CASE SEMINAR

Delayed Puberty and Primary Amenorrhea Associated with a Novel Mutation of the Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor: Clinical, Histological, and Molecular Studies

G. Meduri, P. Touraine, I. Beau, O. Lahuna, A. Desroches, M. C. Vacher-Lavenu, F. Kuttenn and M. Misrahi

INSERM E120 (O.L., A.D., I.B., M.M.) and Laboratoire d’Hormonologie et Biologie Moléculaire (G.M., M.M.), Hôpital Bicêtre, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; and Service d’Endocrinologie et Maladies de la Reproduction (P.T., F.K.), Hôpital Necker; 75015 Paris; Service d’Anatomopathologie (M.C. V.L.), Hôpital Cochin, 75014 Paris, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Micheline Misrahi, INSERM E120, Bat. Gregory Pincus Hôpital Bicêtre, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France. E-mail: micheline.misrahi{at}bct.ap-hop-paris.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Inactivating mutations of the FSH receptor have been described in rare cases of premature ovarian failure. Only one mutation was associated with a complete phenotype, including delayed puberty, primary amenorrhea, and small ovaries. We describe here a new patient presenting a similar complete phenotype of premature ovarian failure, with high plasma FSH levels associated with very low estrogen and inhibin B levels. No biological response to high doses of recombinant FSH was detected. A novel homozygous Pro519Thr mutation was found in this patient. This mutation is located in the second extracellular loop of the FSH receptor, within a motif highly conserved in gonadotropin and TSH receptors. The mutation totally impairs adenylate cyclase stimulation in vitro. FSH binding experiments and confocal microscopy showed that this mutation alters the cell surface targeting of the mutated receptor, which remains trapped intracellularly. Histological studies of the ovaries of the patient showed an increase in the density of small follicles compared with age-matched normal women. A complete block in follicular maturation after the primary stage was also observed. Immunocytochemical studies allowed detection of the expression of c-Kit and proliferation cellular nuclear antigen, whereas no apoptosis was shown by the 3'-end-labeling method. This observation supports the concept that in humans FSH seems mandatory for the initiation of follicular growth only after the primary stage. In our patient complete FSH resistance yields infertility, which is remarkably associated with the persistence of a high number of small follicles.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE FSH RECEPTOR (FSHR) belongs to a particular subgroup of G protein-coupled receptors, which also includes the LH and TSH receptors (reviews in Refs. 1 and 2). These receptors are characterized by the presence of a seven-transmembrane domain involved in G protein coupling and a large extracellular domain involved in high affinity hormone binding. Unlike the LH and TSH receptors, very few natural mutations of the FSHR have been described to date (reviewed in Ref. 3).

The first phenotype of premature ovarian failure (POF) associated with a mutation of the FSHR was described in the Finnish population (4). The patients had a severe phenotype with primary amenorrhea, variable development of secondary sex characteristics, high serum levels of FSH, and streak or hypoplastic ovaries. Histological examination of the ovaries allowed the detection of follicles. However, a block in follicular maturation was observed at early stages (4, 5). The same natural homozygous mutation of the receptor, Ala189Val, was found in all affected women. This mutation markedly impaired FSHR function in vitro.

Until recently this mutation or other mutations of the receptor have not been detected in women presenting the same phenotype in various countries (6, 7). This suggests that other etiologies are much more frequent and that the Ala189Val mutation of the FSHR is particularly prevalent in the Finnish population because of a founder effect and subsequent consanguinity. Very recently, another Finnish patient with POF was found to display two heterozygous mutations of the FSHR; a novel Ala419Thr mutation was found associated with the Ala189Val mutation previously described (8). The patient had primary amenorrhea and normal female secondary sexual characteristics. No histological study of the ovaries of the patient was performed. Therefore, complementary comparative studies, including clinical, histological, immunocytochemical, and molecular analyses, are needed to better understand the role of the FSHR during the early steps of folliculogenesis.

We have subsequently described a second partial phenotype of FSH resistance syndrome in two patients (9, 10). The characteristic feature was the existence of normal-sized ovaries in women presenting high serum levels of FSH. The two patients had, respectively, secondary or primary amenorrhea with normal puberty. Histological and immunocytochemical examination of the ovaries showed a normal follicular development up to the small antral stage and a disruption at further stages. The two patients were compound heterozygotes for mutations of the FSHR. These mutations impaired, but did not abolish, receptor function in vitro for one mutated allele: the Leu601Val receptor mutant for one patient and the Arg573Cys receptor mutant for the second patient, exhibiting, respectively, approximately 12% and 24% residual function. Interestingly, there was a correlation between the residual activity of the mutated receptors and the severity of the clinical, biological, and histological phenotypes of the patients.

We describe here a novel homozygous Pro519Thr mutation of the FSHR in a patient presenting with delayed puberty and primary amenorrhea, high plasma FSH levels, and small ovaries. This mutation, located in the second extracellular loop of the receptor, totally impairs receptor function through an altered expression of the mutated receptor at the cell membrane. This residue is thus critical for cell surface targeting of the FSHR. Furthermore, detailed histological and immunohistochemical studies of the ovary provide an opportunity to further analyze the role of the FSHR in the early steps of folliculogenesis.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Case reports

The proband is a 26-yr-old Caucasian woman who was referred to Necker Hospital for infertility. This patient reported delayed puberty and primary amenorrhea. At the age of 17 yr she began taking an oral contraceptive pill (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 0.15 mg desogestrel), leading to a complete development of secondary sexual characteristics, but she discontinued this treatment when she was 25 yr old because of her desire for pregnancy. She was referred to our department 18 months later. No data are available concerning her family because she was an adopted child.

The patient’s height is 172 cm, and weight is 54 kg, with a body mass index of 18.3. Physical examination revealed normal breast development and normal axillary and pelvic hair without morphological abnormalities. The hormonal evaluations in our department, performed by RIA, revealed high plasma FSH and LH concentrations: FSH, 67 IU/liter (normal range, 1.0–9.0 IU/liter); LH, 21 IU/liter (normal range, 1.4–12 IU/liter); and very low estradiol levels, less than 10 pg/ml (33 pmol/liter; normal range, 20–300 pg/ml). The plasma testosterone level was 0.36 ng/ml (1.2 nmol/liter; normal range, 0.2–0.6 ng/ml), {Delta}4-androstenedione was 2.8 ng/ml (8.4 nmol/liter; normal range, 1.2–1.6 ng/ml), and dehydroepiandrosterone was 14 ng/ml (48.1 nmol/liter; normal range, 2–12 ng/ml). The plasma SHBG level was 85 nmol/liter (normal range, 30–69 nmol/liter). The plasma concentration of inhibin B was markedly low (<10 pg/ml). Thyroid function and plasma PRL levels were normal. No antithyroid or antiovarian autoantibodies could be detected. The karyotype was normal (46,XX). The bone mineral index showed marked osteoporosis at the vertebral site (-2.56 SD; t-score) and osteopenia at the femoral neck (-1.62 SD; t-score). Transvaginal pelvic ultrasonography showed a small uterus (50 x 27 x 17 mm). The two ovaries appeared hypoplastic (0.22 ml for both ovaries), with no evidence of follicular-like structures. A pelvic laparoscopy was performed, revealing a uterus in normal situation, normal right and left fallopian ducts, and small ovaries. One biopsy was performed on each ovary.

Ovarian stimulation by increasing doses of recombinant FSH (Puregon R, Organon, Puteaux, France) was performed after 1 month of treatment with an oral combined estrogen-progestin pill (50 µg ethinyl estradiol and 500 µg norgestrel). It was monitored by hormone assays and pelvic ultrasonography. The total dose of FSH was 10,200 IU. However, after 21 d of stimulation, no follicular development was observed, and plasma estradiol and inhibin B remained at very low levels (<15 and <10 pg/ml, respectively).

The study was approved by the review boards of the different institutions. Informed consent was obtained from the patient and her family.

DNA sequencing

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes. The total coding region of the human FSHR gene was sequenced as previously described (9). Genomic sequencing was performed using a Taq dideoxyterminator cycle sequencing kit and a 373A automated sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Construction of an expression vector encoding the mutated FSHR

The human FSHR cDNA cloned into the pSG5 expression vector (pSG5-hFSHR) has been described previously (11). The mutation was introduced into the pSG5-hFSHR plasmid vector by oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis using QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).

The Pro519Thr substitution was engineered with two mutagenic primers: primer A, 5'-GGTGAGCATCTGCCTGACCATGGATATTGAC-3' starting at position 1539 of the cDNA sequence, +1 corresponding to the first nucleotide of the initiation codon; and the reverse primer B, 5'-GTCAATATCCATGGTCAGGCAGATGCTCACC-3'. The mutated base is underlined. The construct was verified by double-strand sequencing.

Transfection of wild-type and mutated FSHRs in COS-7 cells

Wild-type and mutated FSHRs were transiently transfected in COS-7 cells using Superfect (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) as previously described (9). The expression of total wild-type and mutated receptors in transfected cells was quantified with an immunoenzymatic assay of the FSHR using two additive monoclonal antibodies as previously described (11). Antibody FSHR18 was coated onto 96-well plates (Maxisorb, Nunc, Naperville, IL) in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) for 16 h at 4 C. After washing, the plates were saturated with PBS containing 0.1% Tween and 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were pelleted, and a total membrane extract was prepared. The extract (11) containing the receptor was added at various dilutions in PBS containing 0.1% Tween and 1% BSA and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes with PBS, the plates were incubated with biotinylated antibody FSHR323 (1 µg/ml) at room temperature for 1 h. After washing, the plates were incubated with streptavidin-peroxidase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL) at a 1:1000 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. The immunocomplexes were colored with 2,2'-Azine-di[3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate] and the OD was read at 492 nm. The concentration of the receptor was measured by reference to known concentrations of FSHR fusion proteins purified from Escherichia coli (11).

Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy

Indirect immunofluorescence was performed as described previously (9, 10) on transfected COS-7 cells grown on coverslips using antibody FSHR323. This antibody recognizes an epitope located in the extracellular domain of the FSHR (11) and enables study of receptor expression at the cell membrane. Cells were chilled at 4 C and incubated for 1 h in PBS containing 1% BSA and 5 µg/ml FSHR323. The cells were washed and fixed for 15 min in 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS. After washing, the aldehyde groups were quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS for 30 min. After 1-h saturation with PBS/1% BSA, cells were incubated for 1 h with Alexa Fluor 488-goat antimouse immunoglobulin G (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands). The cells were washed and mounted in PBS/70% glycerol. In some experiments the cells were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS and permeabilized with 0.075% saponin in PBS/1% BSA (9). The cells were then incubated at room temperature for 2 h with antibody FSHR323 and further processed as described above. An Axiovert 135M microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) was used in conjunction with a confocal laser scanning unit (Zeiss LSM410) (9).

Functional assays

COS-7 cells in six-well plates were transfected with 2 µg plasmid as previously described (9). The accumulation of cAMP was measured as previously described (9) after 45-min incubation of the transfected COS-7 cells with increasing concentrations of recombinant FSH (0–3000 IU/liter; Gonal-F, Serono Laboratories, Boulogne-Billancourt, France).

FSH binding was performed as previously described (9, 10). Briefly, cells transfected with wild-type or mutated receptor were incubated for 1 h at 30 C with 400,000 cpm/ml radioiodinated FSH (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA; specific activity, 135 µCi/µg) in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled recombinant FSH (0–30 nM). All experiments were reproduced at least twice with triplicate samples.

Histological and immunocytochemical studies of the ovary

The ovarian biopsy of the patient was fixed in buffered formol and embedded in paraffin. Histological examination was performed with a conventional optical microscope (Provis, Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) on 5-µm thick tissue sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson’s Trichrome stains. The numbers of primordial, intermediary, and primary follicles per square surface unit were counted on the whole section with an image analysis system (Microvision Instruments, Evry, France) connected to a conventional optical microscope (Leitz) as previously described (12). Immunohistochemistry was performed as follows. Briefly, serial tissue sections were deparaffinized by successive baths in xylene and alcohol, and antigen retrieval was performed before immunohistochemistry in a commercial microwave oven at full power in pH-6 citrate buffer for 15 min. The sections were then incubated overnight with the primary antibodies (polyclonal antibodies anti-P450 side-chain cleavage (anti-P450scc; dilution, 1:3000) (13), anti-P450c17{alpha} (14) (dilution, 1:5000), antiaromatase (P450arom; Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute, Inc., Buffalo, NY; dilution, 1:3000), antisteroidogenic factor 1 (anti-SF1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; dilution, 1:100), anti-c-Kit (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; dilution, 1:400), and the monoclonal antibody antiproliferation cellular nuclear antigen (anti-PCNA; clone PC10, Dako, Carpinteria, CA; dilution, 1:200) at 4 C in a humid chamber. After primary antibody incubation, endogenous peroxidases were quenched with 3% H2O2 in PBS (pH 7.4) for 5 min, and the bound antibodies were revealed with a secondary biotinylated antibody and peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (LSAB2 immunostaining kit, Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Aminoethylcarbazol (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Quentin-Fallavier, France) was used as a chromogen. The sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Sections of a biopsy of a normal ovary from an age-matched woman were used as controls.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated deoxy-UTP nick end labeling (TUNEL; Oncogene, Cambridge, UK) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The chromogen used was aminoethylcarbazol. Each experiment was performed at least twice in duplicate on nonadjacent sections.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Sequencing of the FSHR gene

Sequencing of the complete coding region of the human FSHR gene allowed detection of a homozygous missense transversion located in exon 10, where an adenine (A) is substituted for a cytosine (C), resulting in a change of codon 519 (CCC->ACC) of the FSHR gene from proline to threonine (Pro519Thr; Fig. 1AGo). The mutation is located in the second extracellular loop of the FSHR (Fig. 1BGo). This proline is highly conserved in the FSHRs of the different species cloned to date. Furthermore, it is located within a highly conserved motif (KVSIC*PMD) compared with LH and TSH receptors of different species. The patient was adopted, so no familial study could be performed.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Automatic DNA sequencing and location of the mutation detected in the patient. A, Genomic sequence analysis of exon 10 of the human FSHR of the patient. The homozygous Pro519Thr mutation is indicated by an arrow on top. Below a control sequence is shown. In the diagram of the receptor (B), the mutated Pro519Thr amino acid is indicated.

 
Functional studies of the mutated receptor

The mutation was reproduced in an expression vector. COS-7 cells were transfected with either wild-type or mutated receptor. As shown in Fig. 2Go, although FSH stimulation elicited a dose-dependent increase in cAMP accumulation in COS-7 cells transfected with the wild-type receptor, no FSH-induced adenylate cyclase stimulation was detected in COS-7 cells transfected with the mutant receptor even at high (3000 IU/liter) concentrations of FSH (Fig. 2AGo). The same result was obtained in four independent experiments. FSH binding to intact cells transfected with the Pro519Thr FSHR mutant was barely detectable (Fig. 2BGo). The mean ± SEM of specific binding to the mutant receptor were 6.3 ± 1.6% compared with the total specific binding obtained with the wild-type receptor (n = 4). Thus, the mutant receptor seemed to be trapped intracellularly.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Functional studies of wild-type and mutated FSHRs. COS-7 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding the wild-type or mutated receptor. A, FSH-induced cyclase activation of receptors. Transfected cells were incubated for 45 min with increasing concentrations of FSH, and the accumulation of cAMP was measured (see Subjects and Methods). Three experiments were performed with similar results. Inset, Quantification of wild-type (WT) or mutated (P519T) FSHRs expressed in membrane extracts of transfected cells using an immunoenzymatic assay of the FSHR (see Subjects and Methods). The data are presented as the mean ± range of duplicate determinations. B, FSH binding. The cells were incubated with 125I-labeled FSH in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled FSH (see Subjects and Methods). Each point represents the mean (±SEM) of triplicate determinations. •, Wild-type FSHR; {blacksquare}, mutated Pro519Thr receptor.

 
As a control, quantification of the total concentration of FSHR expressed in cells transfected with the wild-type and the mutated receptors was performed. A double determinant (sandwich-type) immunoassay (11) performed with two monoclonal antibodies directed against the extracellular domain of the receptor was used. This assay revealed similar amounts of total wild-type and mutated receptors expressed in transfected cells (Fig. 2BGo, inset).

Cell surface expression of the wild-type and mutated receptors

The distribution of receptor molecules was studied by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy (Fig. 3Go) as previously described (9, 10). Cells transfected with the wild-type or mutated FSHRs were incubated with a monoclonal anti-FSHR antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the receptor. When cells were permeabilized with saponin before incubation with the antibody, a strong intracellular staining was observed, which was similar for cells transfected with the wild-type or mutated receptors (Fig. 3Go, a and c). However, when the cells were incubated with the antibody without prior permeabilization of cells, labeling was observed on the cell surface for cells expressing the wild-type receptor (Fig. 3bGo), but no labeling was observed for cells expressing the Pro519Thr receptor mutant (Fig. 3dGo). This indicates that the mutant receptor is not properly targeted to the cell surface.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Cell surface expression of wild-type and mutated FSHR. COS-7 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding either the wild-type (a and b) or the mutated Pro519Thr (c and d) receptors. Permeabilized (a and c) or nonpermeabilized (b and d) cells were incubated with the monoclonal FSHR323 antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the receptor. Confocal microscopy was used to study the cellular distribution of receptors.

 
Histological and immunocytochemical studies of the ovaries

Histological examination of the ovarian biopsies revealed the presence of a normal cubical surface epithelium. The cortex of the ovary comprised a superficial band of dense fibrous tissue, approximately 0.4 mm thick, which extended beneath the albuginea and was devoid of follicles. Beneath this fibrous layer, numerous small follicles could be observed (Fig. 4Go, A and B). The small follicles could be distinguished as primordial (Fig. 4Go, A and B), composed of an oocyte in the first prophase of meiosis and a single layer of flattened squamous pregranulosa cells; intermediary (Fig. 4Go, A and B), with a mixture of flattened and cubical cells surrounding the oocyte; and primary (Fig. 4CGo), with a monolayer of cubical granulosa cells. No follicle beyond the primary stage could be found in any of the sections examined.



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Histology of the ovaries of the patient. A and B, Primordial and intermediary follicles in the deep cortical region (arrows). Magnification, x40 and x400, respectively. al, Albuginea. Bar, 200 (A) and 50 (B) µm. C, Primary follicle of normal histology, constituted of cubic granulosa cells surrounding an oocyte. Bar, 10 µm.

 
The numbers of primordial, intermediary, and primary follicles per square surface unit were counted with an image analysis system as previously described (12). The follicular population was almost entirely constituted of primordial and intermediary follicles (respectively, 51% and 42% of the total follicular population), whereas few primary follicles (7%) were observed. The mean number (±SD) of these follicles per square millimeter was 24.2 ± 4.6, thus markedly enhanced compared with the follicular density described in women after puberty (15, 16). Immunostaining with c-Kit antibody resulted in the labeling of more than two thirds of the oocytes in the follicles observed (Fig. 5Go, A and C). Similar labeling of the oocytes was observed in a control biopsy of a normal woman of similar age (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Immunocytochemical study of the ovaries of the patient. Low magnification (x40) of the cortical region of the ovaries of the patient (A) and of a normal woman of comparable age (B), immunolabeled with an anti-c-Kit antibody. Note the difference in the follicular density and in the distribution of small follicles. Bars, 200 µm. C, Expression of c-Kit at the surface of the oocyte of an intermediary follicle in the patient’s ovary. Bar, 10 µm. D, Immunolabeling with anti-PCNA antibody. PCNA expression is detected in the granulosa cells and in oocytes of primordial and intermediary follicles in the patient’s ovary. al, Albuginea. Bar, 10 µm. E, F and G, Primordial, intermediary, and primary follicles of the control ovary labeled with anti-PCNA antibody. The oocytes and some granulosa cells are immunolabeled. The follicles were not grouped in nests, but isolated in the cortical stroma. Bar, 10 µm.

 
Immunolabeling with PCNA, a marker of cell proliferation ability and DNA repair (17, 18, 19), performed on a number of six nonconsecutive tissue sections, yielded a labeling of both oocyte and granulosa cells in the majority of the small follicles (Fig. 5DGo).

Conventional optical microscopy on serial sections of tissue did not enable detection of the presence of steroidogenic interstitial cells. Immunostaining with antibodies directed against the steroidogenic enzymes P450scc, P450c17{alpha}, P450arom, and against SF1 was also performed. No interstitial cells expressing steroidogenic enzymes or SF1 were found in the cortex (data not shown).

A 3' end nonradioactive labeling technique, TUNEL (Oncogene, Cambridge, UK), was performed to assess apoptosis. None of the granulosa cells or oocytes was stained (data not shown).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We report here a novel homozygous mutation of the FSHR gene in a woman with delayed puberty and primary amenorrhea. We performed a complete clinical, histological, immunocytochemical, and molecular study in this patient. Few histological observations have been performed to date on patients harboring a single molecular defect of the FSHR. Therefore, the study of supplementary cases, including correlations among clinical, molecular, and histological findings, is necessary to clarify the role of the FSHR in the first stages of folliculogenesis.

Until now only one mutation of the FSHR has been reported in Finnish women presenting an apparent complete phenotype (4). The Finnish patients had delayed or normal puberty and primary amenorrhea. Ovarian histology showed streak or hypoplastic ovaries, with identifiable ovarian tissue always present. The number of follicles detected in the ovaries was very low and was associated with fibrosis (4, 5). However, no quantification of follicular density was performed. Follicular development until the primary stage was observed to be associated with an arrest of follicular maturation at more advanced stages, except occasionally (5). In three of nine cases, normal preantral or more mature follicles were present.

The homozygous Ala189Val mutation, located in the extracellular domain of the receptor, was shown to markedly alter FSHR function. The mutated receptor was sequestered intracellularly (20). A possible remnant FSHR function in vivo has been suggested (20). Recently, another Finnish patient was reported to carry a novel Ala419Thr mutation, associated with the Ala189Val mutation already described. Although the patient had primary amenorrhea, she showed clear signs of endometrial estrogen stimulation, suggesting that the phenotype was less severe compared with the previous patients (8). However, the precise size of the ovaries was not given, and no histological study of the ovaries of the patient was performed (8).

The patient described in this study has a severe clinical and biological phenotype, with delayed puberty, primary amenorrhea, and hypoplastic ovaries. The hormonal evaluation showed very low plasma levels of estradiol and inhibin B. No residual activity of FSHR was detected in vitro, and the ovaries of the patient did not respond to a treatment of 21 d with human recombinant FSH. Indeed, a total dose of 10,200 IU recombinant FSH was unable to induce either an increase in the estradiol or inhibin B levels or the appearance of follicular structure at ultrasonography.

The histological appearance of the ovaries of our patient is characterized by a complete block in follicular maturation beyond the primary stage: no secondary or antral follicles are present. The proportion of each subtype of small follicles corresponds to that described in normal human ovaries (15, 16, 21, 22), and their histological aspect is also normal.

However, the density of small follicles per surface unit appears very high compared with that in age-matched healthy women (15, 16, 21, 22). This density is similar to what is observed in prepubertal ovaries (16, 23). It contrasts with the low number of follicles described in the Finnish patients (5).

The novel mutation present in our patient is a homozygous missense transversion located in exon 10 of the FSHR gene, yielding a Pro519Thr substitution. This mutation is located in the second extracellular loop of the receptor. This proline is highly conserved in the FSHRs of different species cloned to date, but also in the LH and TSH receptors. Furthermore, it is located in a highly conserved motif in the center of exoloop 2, KVSIC*PMDV.

This mutation alters the cell surface targeting of the receptor in vitro, with receptor molecules being trapped intracellularly. When mutations of the second extracellular loop of the LH receptor have been performed (24), mutation of the corresponding proline of the LH receptor (Pro494) into an alanine within the conserved motif also yielded a mutated receptor trapped inside the cells. Human chorionic gonadotropin binding to intact cells was hardly detectable (24). In the case of the FSHR, the mutation Pro519Thr, although corresponding to a different substituted residue, may alter the conformation of the receptor, and this misfolded receptor is trapped intracellularly.

Animal models have also been developed. The ovaries of FSHR-/- mice with targeted disruption of the FSHR gene (25) contain primordial, primary, and secondary follicles up to the preantral stage. In murine knockout models for FSHß, an accumulation of multilayered secondary follicles is observed. The block in folliculogenesis is located before antral formation (26). No normal follicle beyond the preantral stage is present. A well organized thecal layer is present. This has led to the conclusion that theca recruitment is completed autonomously with respect to FSH (26, 27) Taken together, these observations strongly suggest that FSH is not necessary for the initiation of follicular growth or for early follicle development in rodents. The absence of a functional FSHR seems to impede the initiation of follicular growth beyond the primary stage in this patient. This observation is consistent with the presence of FSHR or FSHR mRNAs in primary follicles (28, 29).

To better characterize the mechanism of this block in the follicular growth, we also analyzed the expression of markers previously studied in normal human ovaries. The protooncogene tyrosine kinase c-Kit receptor is one of the elements of the communication between granulosa and oocyte. An antiapoptotic effect of c-Kit ligand on primordial germ cells and oocytes has been demonstrated (reviewed in Ref. 30). c-Kit intervenes in the recruitment of nongrowing follicles to enter the growth phase (31). In the adult human ovary c-Kit is expressed in both oocytes and thecal cells (32, 33). We found expression of c-Kit in more than two thirds of the oocytes in the ovaries of our patient. This observation is consistent with the survival of a large number of small follicles. The lack of further follicular growth does not seem to be due to an absence of c-Kit expression or to apparent oocyte damage.

PCNA is a nuclear protein necessary for cell cycle DNA replication and DNA repair. PCNA is considered by some researchers to herald the beginning of follicular development (31, 34, 35), but DNA synthesis in granulosa cells of small follicles does not seem to be a reliable indicator of impending growth (36). In the fetal ovary of primates, many granulosa cells are immunostained positively for PCNA, whereas fewer of these cells are stained in the adult ovary (37). Thus, the high number of small follicles in our patient, associated with the labeling observed in the majority of granulosa cells and oocytes, is reminiscent of observations made in fetal ovaries (18, 31, 37).

During adult life, follicular apoptosis does not seem to occur in primordial, primary, and secondary follicles in human ovary (38), but is mainly observed in the granulosa cells of antral follicles (39). In our patient the absence of DNA laddering detected by the TUNEL method, an effective technique to show apoptosis in ovarian follicles (38, 39), did not allow the detection of apoptosis in the small follicles. A similar result was obtained in the ovaries of the Finnish patients bearing the Ala189Val FSHR mutation (40). Thus, the lack of follicles at further stages of development does not seem to be due to increased apoptosis.

The absence of steroidogenic cells in the interstitium of this ovary is explained by the absence of secondary follicles, as the steroidogenic cells in the ovarian cortex are derived from thecal cells, which appear only at the secondary stage of follicular growth (41).

Our findings support the concept that in humans, FSH seems mandatory for the initiation of follicular growth only after the primary stage. FSH resistance is a cause of infertility, which, however, is remarkably associated with the persistence of a high number of small follicles. The study of supplementary patients with loss of function mutations of the receptor is warranted because individual variations might also exist. High doses of recombinant FSH may be used in patients carrying a partial loss of receptor function (9), whereas it may be hoped that in vitro oocyte maturation will be possible in the future for patients with complete loss of FSHR function.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank F. Jaubert for his help with the histological studies, and C. Matuchansky for ultrasonographic investigations. We thank P. Leclerc (Service Commun de Microscopie Confocale, IFR Bicêtre) for his help with the confocal microscopy analysis. The rabbit polyclonal antibody antiP450scc was a kind gift from Prof. I. Hanukoglu (Department of Hormone Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel). The rabbit polyclonal antibody antiP450c17{alpha} was a kind gift from Prof. S. Kominami (Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan). We thank C. Pichon for providing the monoclonal anti-FSHR antibody necessary for this work. We also thank K. Laborde and C. Matuchansky for their help.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by INSERM, the University Paris XI, and the Fondation pour le Recherche Médicale Française.

G.M. and P.T. contributed equally to this work.

Abbreviations: FSHR, FSH receptor; P450arom, aromatase cytochrome P450; P450c17{alpha}, 17{alpha}-hydroxylase cytochrome P450; P450scc, side-chain cleavage; PCNA, proliferation cellular nuclear antigen; POF, premature ovarian failure; SF1, steroidogenic factor 1; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated deoxy-UTP nick end labeling.

Received February 10, 2003.

Accepted April 30, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Simoni M, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E 1997 The follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Endocr Rev 18:739–773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ascoli M, Fanelli F, Segaloff DL 2002 The lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor, a 2002 perspective. Endocr Rev 23:141–174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Themmen APN, Huhtaniemi IT 2000 Mutations of gonadotropins and gonadotropin receptors: elucidating the physiology and pathophysiology of pituitary gonadal function. Endocr Rev 21:551–583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Aittomaki K, Dieguez Lucena J, Pakarinen P, Sistoneen P, Tapanainen J, Gromoll J, Kaskikari R, Sankila EM, Lehvaslaiho H, Reyes Engel A, Nieschlag E, Huhtaniemi I, de la Chapelle A 1995 Mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene causes hereditary hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. Cell 82:959–968[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Aittomaki K, Herva R, Stenman UH, Juntunen K., Ylöstalo P, Hovatta O, de la Chapelle A 1996. Clinical features of primary ovarian failure caused by a point mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3722–3726
  6. Layman LC, Arnde S, Cohen DP, Jin M, Xie J 1999 The Finnish follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene mutation is rare in North American women with 46,XX ovarian failure. Fertil Steril 69:300–302
  7. Conway GS, Conway E, Walker C, Hoppner W, Gromoll J, Simoni M 1999 Mutation screening and isoform prevalence of the follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene in women with premature ovarian failure, resistant ovary syndrome and polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 51:97–99[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Doherty E, Pakarinen P, Tiitinen A, Kiilavuori A, Huhtaniemi I, Forrest S, Aittomaki K 2002 A novel mutation in the FSH Receptor inhibiting signal transduction and causing primary ovarian failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1151–1155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Beau I, Touraine P, Meduri G, Gougeon A, Desroches A, Matuchansky C, Milgrom E, Kuttenn F, Misrahi M 1998 A novel phenotype related to partial loss of function mutations of the follicle stimulating hormone receptor. J Clin Invest 102:1352–1359[Medline]
  10. Touraine P, Beau I, Gougeon A, Meduri G, Desroches A, Pichard C, Detoeuf M, Paniel M, Prieur M, Zorn JR, Milgrom E, Kuttenn F, Misrahi M 1999 New natural inactivating mutations of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: correlations between receptor function and phenotype. Mol Endocrinol 13:1844–1855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vannier B. Loosfelt H, Meduri G, Pichon C, Milgrom E 1996 Anti-human FSH receptor monoclonal antibodies: immunochemical and immunocytochemical characterization of the receptor. Biochemistry 35:1358–66[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Couzinet B, Meduri G, Lecce M-G, Young J, Brailly S, Looosfelt H, Milgrom E, Schaison G 2001 The postmenopausal ovary is not a major androgen-producing gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5060–5066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hanukoglu I, Suh BS, Himmelhoch S, Amsterdam A 1990 Induction and mitochondrial localization of cytochrome P450 scc system enzymes in normal and transformed granulosa cells. J Cell Biol 111:1373–1381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kominami S, Shinzawa K, Takemori S 1983 Immunochemical studies on cytochrome P450 in adrenal microsomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 755:163–169[Medline]
  15. Lass A, Silye R, Abrams DC, Krausz T, Hovatta O, Raul M, Winston RML 1997 Follicular density in ovarian biopsy of infertile women: a novel method to assess ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 12:1028–1031
  16. Poirot C, Vacher-Lavenu MC, Helardot P, Guibert J, Brugières L, Jouannet P 2002 Human ovarian tissue cryopreservation: indications and feasibility. Hum Reprod 17:1447–1452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Oktay K, Newton H, Mullan J, Gosden RG 1998 Development of human primordial follicles to antral stages in SCID/hpg mice stimulated with follicle stimulating hormone. Hum Reprod 13:1133–1138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wandji SA, Srsen V, Voss AK, Eppig JJ, Fortune JE 1996 Initiation in vitro of growth of bovine primordial follicles. Biol Reprod 55:942–948[Abstract]
  19. Fortune J, Cushman RA, Wahl C-M, Kito S 2000 The primordial to primary follicle transition. Mol Cell Endocrinol 163:53–60[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Ranniko A, Pakarinen P, Manna P, Beau I, Misrahi M, Aittomaki K, Huhtaniemi I 2002 Functional characterization of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor with inactivating Ala189Val mutation. Mol Hum Reprod 8:311–317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Block E 1952 Quantitative morphological investigations of the follicular system in women. Acta Anat 14:108–123[Medline]
  22. Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F, Qu J, Motta P, Donnez J 2000 Histologic and ultrastructural evaluation of fresh and frozen-thawed human ovarianxenografts in nude mice. Fertil Steril 74:122–129[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Block E 1953 Quantitative morphological investigations of the follicular system innewborn female infants. Acta Anat 17:201–206[Medline]
  24. Ryu K S, Lee HY, Kim S P, Beauchamp J, Tung C S, Isaacs NW, Ji I, Ji TH 1998 Modulation of high affinity hormone binding: Human choriogonadotropin binding to the exodomain of the receptor is influenced by exoloop 2 of the receptor. J Biol Chem 273:6285–6291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Dierich A, Ram Sairam M, Monaco L, Maria Fimia G, Gansmuller A, Lemeur M, Sassone-Corsi P 1998 Impairing follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) signaling in vivo: targeted disruption of the FSH receptor leads to aberrant gametogenesis and hormonal imbalance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13612–13617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kumar TR, Wang Y, Lu N, Matzuk MM 1997 Follicle stimulating hormone is required for ovarian follicle maturation but not male fertility. Nat Genet 15:201–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Burns KH, Yan C, Kumar TR, Matzuk MM 2001 Analysis of ovarian gene expression in follicle-stimulating hormone ß knockout mice. Endocrinology 142:2742–2751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Meduri G, Charnaux N, Draincourt MA, Combettes L, Granet P, Vannier B, Loosfelt H, Milgrom E 2002 Follicle-stimulating hormone in oocytes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2266–2276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Oktay K, Briggs D, Gosden RG 1997 Ontogeny of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene expression in isolated human ovarian follicles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3748–3751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Driancourt MA, Reynaud K, Cortvrindt R, Smitz J 2000 Roles of KIT and KIT ligand in ovarian function. Rev Reprod 5:143–152[Abstract]
  31. Fortune J, Cushman R A, Wahl C M, Kito S 2000 The primordial to primary follicle transition. Mol Cell Endocrinol 163:53–60
  32. Tanikawa M, Harada T, Mitsunari M, Onohara Y, Iwabe T, Terakawa N 1998 Expression of c-kit messenger ribonucleic acid in human oocyte and presence of soluble c-kit in follicular fluid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1239–1242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Parrott JA, Skinner MK 1997 Direct action of kit ligand on theca cell growth and differentiation. Endocrinology 138:3819–3827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Oktay K, Schenken RS, Nelson JF 1995 Proliferating cell nuclear antigen marks the initiation of follicular growth in the rat. Biol Reprod 53:295–301[Abstract]
  35. Picton HM 2001 Activation of follicle development: the primordial follicle. Theriogenology 55:1193–1210[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Meredith S, Dudenhoeffer G, Jackson K 2000 Classification of small type B/C follicles as primordial follicles in mature rats. J Reprod Fertil 119:43–48[Abstract]
  37. Gougeon A, Busso D 2000 Morphologic and functional determinants of primordial and primary follicles in the monkey ovary. Mol Cell Endocrinol 163:33–41[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Yuan Yang M, Rajamahendran R 2000 Morphological and biochemical identification of apoptosis in small, medium, and large bovine follicles and the effects of follicle-stimulating hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I on spontaneous apoptosis in cultured bovine granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 32:1209–1217
  39. Vaskivuo TE, Anttonen M, Herva R, Billig H, Dorland M, te Velde ER, Stenbäck F, Heikinheimo M, Tapanainen J S 2001 Survival of human ovarian follicles from fetal to adult life: apoptosis, apoptosis-related proteins, and transcription factor GATA-4. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3421–3429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Vaskivuo TE, Aittomaki K, Anttonen M, Ruokonen A, Herva R, Osawa Y, Heikinheimo M, Huhtaniemi I 2002 Effects of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and human chorionic gonadotropin in individuals with inactivating mutation of the FSH receptor. Fertil Steril 78:108–113[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Erickson GF, Magoffin D. A, Dyer CA, Hofeditz C 1985 The ovarian androgen producing cells: a review of structure/function relationships. Endocr Rev 6: 371–399



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Aboura, C. Dupas, G. Tachdjian, M.-F. Portnoi, N. Bourcigaux, D. Dewailly, R. Frydman, B. Fauser, N. Ronci-Chaix, B. Donadille, et al.
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Profiling Analysis Reveals Deoxyribonucleic Acid Copy Number Variations Associated with Premature Ovarian Failure
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4540 - 4546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Bachelot, A. Rouxel, N. Massin, J. Dulon, C. Courtillot, C. Matuchansky, Y. Badachi, A. Fortin, B. Paniel, F. Lecuru, et al.
Phenotyping and genetic studies of 357 consecutive patients presenting with premature ovarian failure
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2009; 161(1): 179 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. M. Allan, P. Lim, M. Robson, J. Spaliviero, and D. J. Handelsman
Transgenic mutant D567G but not wild-type human FSH receptor overexpression provides FSH-independent and promiscuous glycoprotein hormone Sertoli cell signaling
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2009; 296(5): E1022 - E1028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
R. Beck-Fruchter, A. Weiss, and E. Shalev
GnRH agonist therapy as ovarian protectants in female patients undergoing chemotherapy: a review of the clinical data
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 553 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Huser, I. Crha, P. Ventruba, R. Hudecek, J. Zakova, L. Smardova, Z. Kral, and J. Jarkovsky
Prevention of ovarian function damage by a GnRH analogue during chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 863 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
B. Mandon-Pepin, P. Touraine, F. Kuttenn, C. Derbois, A. Rouxel, F. Matsuda, A. Nicolas, C. Cotinot, and M. Fellous
Genetic investigation of four meiotic genes in women with premature ovarian failure
Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 158(1): 107 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR)
Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. L. Chand, G. T. Ooi, C. A. Harrison, A. N. Shelling, and D. M. Robertson
Functional analysis of the human inhibin {alpha} subunit variant A257T and its potential role in premature ovarian failure
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3241 - 3248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. M. Conn, A. Ulloa-Aguirre, J. Ito, and J. A. Janovick
G Protein-Coupled Receptor Trafficking in Health and Disease: Lessons Learned to Prepare for Therapeutic Mutant Rescue in Vivo
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2007; 59(3): 225 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Oktay, M. Sonmezer, O. Oktem, K. Fox, G. Emons, and H. Bang
Absence of Conclusive Evidence for the Safety and Efficacy of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogue Treatment in Protecting Against Chemotherapy-Induced Gonadal Injury
Oncologist, September 1, 2007; 12(9): 1055 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Kleinau, M. Claus, H. Jaeschke, S. Mueller, S. Neumann, R. Paschke, and G. Krause
Contacts between Extracellular Loop Two and Transmembrane Helix Six Determine Basal Activity of the Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2007; 282(1): 518 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Sundblad, V. A. Chiauzzi, L. Andreone, S. Campo, E. H. Charreau, and L. Dain
Controversial role of inhibin {alpha}-subunit gene in the aetiology of premature ovarian failure
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1154 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. M. Allan, A. Garcia, J. Spaliviero, M. Jimenez, and D. J. Handelsman
Maintenance of Spermatogenesis by the Activated Human (Asp567Gly) FSH Receptor During Testicular Regression Due to Hormonal Withdrawal
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 938 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. P N Themmen
An update of the pathophysiology of human gonadotrophin subunit and receptor gene mutations and polymorphisms
Reproduction, September 1, 2005; 130(3): 263 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. Goswami and G. S. Conway
Premature ovarian failure
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2005; 11(4): 391 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Bachelot, G. Meduri, N. Massin, M. Misrahi, F. Kuttenn, and P. Touraine
Ovarian Steroidogenesis and Serum Androgen Levels in Patients with Premature Ovarian Failure
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2391 - 2396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Massin, A. Gougeon, G. Meduri, E. Thibaud, K. Laborde, C. Matuchansky, E. Constancis, M.C. Vacher-Lavenu, B. Paniel, J.R. Zorn, et al.
Significance of ovarian histology in the management of patients presenting a premature ovarian failure
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2555 - 2560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Oktay, M. Sonmezer, and O. Oktem
'Ovarian cryopreservation versus ovarian suppression by GnRH analogues: primum non nocere': Reply
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1681 - 1683.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M. Sonmezer and K. Oktay
Fertility preservation in female patients
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2004; 10(3): 251 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Oktay and M. Sonmezer
Ovarian tissue banking for cancer patients: Fertility preservation, not just ovarian cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 477 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Misrahi, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Misrahi, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals