| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics (N.C., F.F.), Geriatric Medicine, and Metabolic Diseases (D.M., M.C., G.P.), Second University of Naples, I-80138 Naples, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Giuseppe Paolisso, M.D., Department of Geriatric Medicine and Metabolic Diseases, IV Internal Medicine, Piazza Miraglia 2, I-80138 Napoli, Italy. E-mail: giuseppe.paolisso{at}unina2.it.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well known that nitric oxide (NO) regulates blood pressure and blood flow (9) and that those estrogens induce endothelial NO production (10). In vitro, it has also been shown that raloxifene induces endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (11); thus, one can hypothesize that raloxifene may directly activate NO release from endothelial cells. Unfortunately, data from humans are lacking. Thus, our aim was investigating the possible modulator effect of raloxifene administration on endothelial function in postmenopausal women.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sixty healthy postmenopausal women (months since last menstrual period: mean, 35; range, 1273; FSH levels, >50 IU/liter; 17ß-estradiol levels, <100 pmol/liter) volunteered for the study. None of them had ever received any hormonal treatment before the study and/or antioxidant vitamin or other drugs that might have influenced endothelial function. Exclusion criteria were arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, hepatic and renal disorders, venous thrombosis, coronary heart disease, and a history of hot flashes.
Study design
The study was designed as double-blind, randomized vs. placebo trial. At baseline, after an overnight fast (at least 12 h) in a quiet comfortable room with a temperature range between 22 and 24 C, all patients underwent the following tests: 1) anthropometrics and metabolic determinations; 2) brachial reactivity test to evaluate the endothelial-dependent and independent function through the study of arterial diameter and flow changes; 3) blood sampling for assessment of oxidative stress indexes and plasma adhesion molecules levels. In addition, brachial reactivity test was performed in 30 healthy young women in the premenopausal state for evaluating the possible difference in endothelial function between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Only postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive raloxifene (60 mg/d; Evista, Eli Lilly Italia, Rome, Italy; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30). Each treatment lasted 4 months. No dropouts were reported throughout the study, and no woman had any side effect throughout raloxifene administration. At the end of this treatment period, a complete reevaluation of patients was made. In the raloxifene-treated subjects (n = 30), the brachial reactivity test was repeated along with intraarterial infusion of NG- monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), an inhibitor of NO synthase (4 µmol/min, CLINALFA, Läufelfingen, Switzerland).
After clear explanation of potential risks of participation, each volunteer gave a written informed consent to participate in the study, approved by the Ethical Committee of our institution.
Anthropometric determinations
Weight and height were measured using a standard technique. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (kilograms)/height (square meters). Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest (normally umbilical level), and hip circumference was measured at the level of the trochanter. Both circumferences were measured to the nearest 0.5 cm with a plastic tape, and the waist to hip ratio (WHR) was calculated.
Endothelial function
Endothelial function was evaluated by brachial reactivity study as previously reported (12, 13). Briefly, brachial reactivity was detected using a high-frequency ultrasound technique. Differences between endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vasodilatation were assessed by evaluating brachial reactivity parameters after reactive hyperemia and after nitroglycerin (0.4 mg sublingual), respectively. All patients were kept at rest in the supine position in a temperature-controlled room (
22 C). The left arm was immobilized in the extended position to allow consistent brachial artery access for imaging. Brachial artery diameter and flow velocity were imaged using a 10-MHz linear array transducer ultrasound system (ATL5000HDI, ATL Ultrasound Inc., Bothell, WA). Brachial arterial diameter and blood flow velocity were recorded at 1-min intervals. After that, a blood pressure cuff was placed over the ipsilateral upper arm just above the transducer, inflated for 5 min at 200 mm Hg, and then suddenly deflated. The postischemic scan was performed 60 sec after cuff deflation, whereas brachial artery diameter and flow were measured at 1-min intervals for 5 min. After an additional 10-min rest period (to allow arterial diameter to return to prereactive hyperemia size), two-dimensional images were again obtained at baseline and 3 min after sublingual nitroglycerin. All images were recorded on videotape for subsequent off-line analysis on the same instrument by the single observer blinded to the conditions under which the ultrasonic images were obtained.
Intraobserver variability for measuring brachial artery diameter and flow was assessed by comparing a minimum of three separate baseline measurements in each patient. The coefficient of variation was 2.1% for baseline arterial and 9% for percentage change of arterial diameter. Baseline arterial flow and percentage change in arterial flow were 9.7% and 9.2%, respectively. These values were not dissimilar from those reported by other authors (14).
Analytical techniques
Plasma glucose concentration was determined by the glucose oxidative methods (glucose autoanalyzer, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA). Plasma fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were determined by routine laboratory methods. C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured in serum using an ELISA based on purified protein and polyclonal anti-CRP antibodies (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). The degree of serum oxidative stress was measured as the reaction product of malondialdehyde with thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS; Refs. 17, 18, 19), the inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 3.4 and 2.3%, respectively. The plasma total antioxidant capacity, assessed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), was estimated by the 2,2-azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid radical cation decolorization assay, using Trolox as a standard, according to the method of Miller et al. (21), the inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 5.2% and 3.8%, respectively. Serum levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and E-selectin were determined by an ELISA (R\|[amp ]\|D Systems, Abingdon, UK). The procedures were performed according to the manufacturers instructions. For ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin, the intraassay coefficients of variation were 4.1%, 3.1%, and 3.1%, respectively.
Calculation and statistical analyses
All results are mean ± SD. Mean arterial blood pressure was calculated as diastolic blood pressure plus one third-pulse pressure. Nonnormally distributed variables were log-transformed (for all calculations) and then back-transformed (for result presentation). The percentage change was calculated with baseline values equal to 100%. The nQuery test was used to predict the adequacy of sample size. This test demonstrated that 14 subjects in each group were sufficient to obtain a significant difference in brachial reactivity parameters (P < 0.001). Because we were interested in examining the effect of a risk factor cluster, we converted all risk factors associated with endothelial damage (plasma oxidative stress indices and plasma adhesion molecules levels) into the same unit, as z-score. Successively, the sum of z-scores of all five factors (TEAC, TBARS, VCAM1, ICAM1, and E-selectin) for each individual was calculated as a summary measure of endothelial damage score. This z-score sum gives equal weights to all factors. The z-score sum was shown to yield a measure of the endothelial damage similar to one derived by a principal components analysis. ANOVA was used to calculate the difference between the two study groups. Pearsons simple correlation was used to study the association between two variables. Partial correlation was used to investigate the relationship between two variables independently of covariates. All calculations were made on an IBM PC computer by SPSS 9.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Premenopausal and postmenopausal women had similar anthropometrics and metabolic parameters, as well as arterial blood pressure (Table 1
). In contrast, plasma CRP level, oxidative stress indexes, and plasma adhesion molecule levels were significantly different between pre- and postmenopausal women. With regard to brachial artery parameters (Table 2
), endothelial-dependent changes in brachial artery diameter and flow were significantly higher in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women. In contrast, no differences in diameter and flow of nitroglycerin-mediated changes were found between the two groups.
|
|
At the end of the treatment period, no changes in anthropometric parameters, plasma glucose levels, and arterial blood pressure between placebo and raloxifene groups were found; in contrast, raloxifene treatment was associated with a significant decline in plasma LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels, whereas plasma HDL cholesterol and CRP levels remained unchanged. With regard to oxidative stress indexes and plasma adhesion molecule levels, raloxifene treatment significantly increased plasma TEAC whereas it reduced TBARS, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin levels (Table 3
). Changes in endothelial-dependent parameters are reported in Table 4
. Raloxifene, but not placebo, treatment was associated with a significant increase in brachial artery diameter and flow; in contrast, no significant changes in endothelial-independent arterial diameter and flow, after placebo and raloxifene treatment, were found (Table 4
).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is well known that premenopausal women have a low incidence of risk of coronary artery disease compared with men, and that such risk rises markedly after menopause. At the present time, the role of hormone replacement therapy is very controversial. In fact, numerous studies seem to show that hormone replacement therapy lowers the risk of coronary artery disease to premenopausal levels in postmenopausal women (22, 23, 24, 25, 26). In addition, acute estrogen administration restores the endothelium-dependent dilatation of atherosclerotic arteries in primate models (27), a phenomenon partially related to the ability of estrogen to enhance the bioavailability of NO. On the other hand, NO exerts antiinflammatory and antiaterogenic activities (28). In fact, the loss of endothelium-derived NO activity leads to enhanced platelet aggregation, and it increases vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and endothelial-leukocyte interactions (29). Natural estrogens exert most of their cardioprotective effects by directly enhancing endothelial NO production (30). Despite such evidence, several data (31, 32, 33, 34) seemed to demonstrate that although estrogen has an acute vasodilatation effect, its long-term effect does not show any cardioprotection, but it shows instead a harmful effect in menopausal women. Thus, whether the raloxifene effect has long-term impact on prevention of arteriosclerosis in postmenopausal women needs to be investigated. In fact, less is known about possible actions of selective estrogen receptor modulators such as raloxifene on the cardiovascular wall. Recent studies have shown that droloxifene, a new selective estrogen receptor modulator, reduces plasma levels of LDL in postmenopausal women (35). Indeed, LY117018, a raloxifene analog, acts directly on the vessel wall, regulating endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule expression (3), and has an antiatherosclerotic action on cholesterol-fed rabbits (4). Thus, it has been hypothesized that raloxifene may act through NO-mediated mechanisms. This hypothesis is supported by recent investigations describing an endothelium-dependent vascular relaxing activity for raloxifene and suggesting that NO release may be involved. In fact, Saitta et al. (36) have demonstrated that raloxifene administration is associated with brachial reactivity improvement and with an increase in plasma NO levels in postmenopausal women. Indeed, Simoncini et al. (11) demonstrated that raloxifene acutely stimulates NO production from human endothelial cells, describing a potential novel mechanism that could explain the vasodilatatory effects of raloxifene and its antiaterogenic role. Indeed, such authors (11) demonstrated that: 1) raloxifene acutely (<30 min) increases endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) enzymatic activity, and this effect is dependent on a functional interaction with an estrogen receptor; and 2) eNOS activation by this molecule may be mediated by a nongenomic mechanism as for natural estrogen (11). Such results may also indicate that eNOS activation in endothelial cells can be triggered by different estrogen receptor conformational changes (11). According to these results, our study provides evidence that raloxifene administration, in postmenopausal women, has an antiatherosclerotic effect due to a significant improvement in endothelial-dependent brachial reactivity and to a lowering of plasma oxidative stress and plasma adhesion molecule levels. An unexpected and additional finding of our study is that the effect of raloxifene treatment on plasma LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels is not correlated to the improvement of endothelial function. This latter result prompts us to hypothesize that change in plasma lipid levels do not contribute significantly to the raloxifene-mediated improvement in endothelial function. This event is particularly important in light of the hypothesis that, in postmenopausal women, raloxifene acts directly on endothelial cells releasing NO, as already shown in vitro and in animal models. The direct impact of raloxifene on endothelial function is also strengthened by our data showing that raloxifene treatment is associated with an improvement in endothelial-dependent. This last effect is inhibited by the contemporary presence of L-NMMA. In fact, the intraarterial administration of L-NMMA, after raloxifene treatment, neutralized the positive effect of raloxifene per se on endothelial function. Thus, in light of such results, it is possible to assert that the effect of raloxifene is NO mediated. Furthermore, we also hypothesize that the impact of raloxifene on endothelial function might be due to a decline in the risk factors (oxidative stress indices and plasma cell adhesion molecules levels) for endothelial damage, such as demonstrated by the cluster analysis.
Indeed, most previous evidence has addressed the hypothesis that a risk factor per se may negatively affect endothelial function. The evidence that the relationship between endothelial-dependent vasodilatation parameters and clustering of risk factors for endothelial damage persists, even after adjusting for age, BMI, and major plasma lipid levels, supports, even if it does not demonstrate, the hypothesis that raloxifene administration can control the whole negative impact of high plasma levels of oxidative stress indices and cell adhesion molecules on endothelial function. It is important to point out that our study does not show a raloxifene-related decline in CRP. Indeed such data need to be confirmed because contradictory results (37, 38, 39) have been provided.
In conclusion, our study provides evidence that raloxifene treatment is associated with a protective effect on endothelial function, as evidenced by a significant positive modulation of endothelial-dependent vasodilatation. Such effect seems also to be related to a reduction in risk factors for endothelial damage. This finding opens new potential therapeutic insight into the prevention of vascular atherosclerotic events for such molecules.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; eNOS, endothelial NO synthase; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; L-NMMA, NG- monomethyl-L-arginine; NO, nitric oxide; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance; TEAC, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; WHR, waist to hip ratio.
Received October 7, 2002.
Accepted February 18, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mediates the nongenomic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by estrogen. J Clin Invest 103:401406[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kublickiene, E. Svedas, B.-M. Landgren, M. Crisby, N. Nahar, H. Nisell, and L. Poston Small Artery Endothelial Dysfunction in Postmenopausal Women: In Vitro Function, Morphology, and Modification by Estrogen and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6113 - 6122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. P. Leung, X. Yao, C.-W. Lau, W.-H. Ko, L. Lu, and Y. Huang Raloxifene relaxes rat intrarenal arteries by inhibiting Ca2+ influx Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): F137 - F144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Speyer, N. J. Rancilio, S. D. McClintock, J. D. Crawford, H. Gao, J. V. Sarma, and P. A. Ward Regulatory effects of estrogen on acute lung inflammation in mice Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): C881 - C890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Jeong, H. Lin, and M. Hu Disposition Mechanisms of Raloxifene in the Human Intestinal Caco-2 Model J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2004; 310(1): 376 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |