help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Bayraktar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Bayraktar, M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 5 2031-2036
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Glucose Intolerance, Insulin Resistance, and Hyperandrogenemia in First Degree Relatives of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Bülent O. Yildiz, Hakan Yarali, Havva Oguz and Miyase Bayraktar

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism (B.O.Y., M.B.); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (H.Y.); and Department of Pediatrics, Endocrinology Unit (H.O.), Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Bülent O. Yildiz, Emeklisubayevleri 2, C. 23 C Blok 15/3, 06580 Yucetepe, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail: yildizbo{at}yahoo.com.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance (IR), increased risk of glucose intolerance, and type 2 diabetes. Family studies have indicated a genetic susceptibility to PCOS. The aims of this study were 1) to assess glucose tolerance status, gonadotropins, and androgens in first degree relatives of patients with PCOS; and 2) to assess IR in normal glucose tolerant (NGT) family members. One hundred two family members of 52 patients with PCOS [MothersPCOS (n = 34; mean age, 46.5 yr; mean body mass index (BMI), 28.8 kg/m2), FathersPCOS (n = 24; mean age, 50.4 yr; mean BMI, 27.5 kg/m2), SistersPCOS (n = 19; mean age, 25.1 yr; mean BMI, 22.9 kg/m2), and BrothersPCOS (n = 25; mean age, 23.7 yr; mean BMI, 22.5 kg/m2)] and 82 unrelated healthy control subjects without a family history of diabetes or PCOS (4 age- and weight-matched subgroups, i.e. ControlMothersPCOS, ControlFathersPCOS, ControlSistersPCOS, and ControlBrothersPCOS) were studied. Glucose and insulin (at baseline and during a 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test) were measured. IR was assessed by fasting insulin (FI), fasting glucose to insulin ratio (FGI), homeostatic model assessment (HOMA IR), and area under the curve for insulin during the oral glucose tolerance test (AUCinsulin) in NGT MothersPCOS, FathersPCOS, SistersPCOS, BrothersPCOS, and matched control subgroups. Including the prestudy-diagnosed 3 mothers and 2 fathers with diabetes, diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) were noted in 16% and 30% of MothersPCOS and 27% and 31% of FathersPCOS, respectively. There was no diabetes in SistersPCOS and BrothersPCOS. IGT was found in 5% of SistersPCOS. Impaired fasting glucose was found in 3% of MothersPCOS and 4% of BrothersPCOS. The analysis of NGT family members showed that MothersPCOS had higher FI (P < 0.05), HOMA IR (P < 0.05), and AUCinsulin (P < 0.01) and lower FGI (P < 0.05) than ControlMothersPCOS, whereas all IR parameters were comparable between FathersPCOS and their matched control subgroup. SistersPCOS had higher FI (P < 0.05), HOMA IR (P < 0.01), and AUCinsulin (P < 0.05) and lower FGI (P < 0.01), and BrothersPCOS had higher AUCinsulin (P < 0.01) than their matched control subgroups, respectively. MothersPCOS had higher testosterone levels than ControlMothersPCOS (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 for pre- and postmenopausal women, respectively). SistersPCOS had higher LH (P < 0.01), testosterone (P < 0.001), androstenedione (P < 0.01), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (P < 0.05) levels than ControlSistersPCOS. There was no difference in gonadotropin and androgen levels in FathersPCOS compared with ControlFathersPCOS or in BrothersPCOS compared with ControlBrothersPCOS.

Our results suggest that 1) first degree relatives of patients with PCOS may be at high risk for diabetes and glucose intolerance; 2) NGT female family members have insulin resistance; and 3) mothers and sisters of PCOS patients have higher androgen levels than control subjects. We propose that the high risks of these impairments warrant screening in first degree relatives of patients with PCOS.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder, affecting approximately 4–8% of reproductive-aged women; it is characterized by hyperandrogenism and chronic anovulation (1, 2, 3, 4). PCOS is associated with an increased risk for metabolic complications, including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease (5). Women with PCOS are at substantially higher risk for impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes, with combined prevalence rates of 35–40% for glucose intolerance (6, 7). Insulin resistance (IR) and hyperinsulinemia play important roles in the pathogenesis of PCOS (8). In addition, ß-cell insulin secretory defects are present in women with PCOS (9, 10), which are most evident among a subset of patients who have a first degree relative with type 2 diabetes (9).

Familial aggregation of PCOS consistent with a genetic etiology has been well documented (11). Family studies of PCOS investigated mainly ovarian morphology, menstrual irregularities, and symptoms of hyperandrogenism and hyperandrogenemia (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19).

Norman et al. (20), studying the families of five patients with PCOS, reported that increased insulin levels were common among first degree relatives. Colilla et al. (21) noted that there was a heritable component of ß-cell dysfunction in families of women with PCOS. Recently, Legro et al. reported that affected sisters of women with PCOS (who fulfill criteria for the diagnosis of PCOS, and those with hyperandrogenemia) had high insulin levels and low fasting glucose to insulin ratios (22), and the brothers of women with PCOS had increased dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS) levels (23).

It is likely that PCOS represents a complex multifactorial trait, inherited similarly to type 2 diabetes. First degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes have a high lifetime risk of developing diabetes (24). Although limited, the available evidence raises the hypothesis that first degree relatives of women with PCOS may also have increased risk of glucose intolerance.

The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate glucose tolerance status and gonadotropin and androgen levels in first degree relatives of patients with PCOS. We also aimed to assess IR in normal glucose tolerant (NGT) family members.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

A total of 52 consecutive patients with PCOS were recruited. The diagnosis of PCOS was based on elevated serum total or free testosterone levels and peripubertal onset oligomenorrhea (<=6 menses/yr) or amenorrhea. Cushing’s syndrome, nonclassical 21-hydroxylase deficiency, hyperprolactinemia, thyroid dysfunction, and androgen-secreting tumors were excluded, according to the recommendations of the NICHHD consensus conference on PCOS (8). Three patients had diabetes, and 2 patients had IGT, as determined by a 2-h, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (25).

After obtaining permission from patients with PCOS, an attempt was made to contact all first degree relatives. Of the available and living 51 mothers, 52 fathers, 34 sisters, and 45 brothers, 37 mothers (73%), 26 fathers (50%), 19 sisters (56%), and 25 brothers (56%) agreed to participate in the study. Three mothers and 2 fathers had previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes, and a total of 102 first degree relatives [MothersPCOS (n = 34), FathersPCOS (n = 24), SistersPCOS (n = 19), and BrothersPCOS (n = 25)] were studied. Of the 19 sisters, 1 family had 2 sisters, and of the 25 brothers, 4 families had 2 brothers in the study. Four age- and weight-matched subgroups including unrelated healthy subjects without a family history of diabetes and PCOS were formed to serve as the controls. These control subgroups were defined as ControlMothersPCOS (n = 24), ControlFathersPCOS (n = 12), ControlSistersPCOS (n = 31), and ControlBrothersPCOS (n = 15). The female control subjects had no personal history of PCOS, i.e. regular cycles and normal androgen levels. Eleven (32%) women in the MothersPCOS and 8 (33%) women in the ControlMothersPCOS groups were postmenopausal. All women in the SistersPCOS and ControlSistersPCOS groups were premenopausal. None of the women in the ControlMothersPCOS and ControlSistersPCOS groups had hirsutism (Ferriman-Gallwey score, <8) (26) or acne on physical examination. All women in the ControlSistersPCOS group and all premenopausal women in the ControlMothersPCOS group had regular menses every 27–35 d.

All medications, including oral contraceptives, known to alter sex hormone metabolism or insulin action and/or kinetics had been discontinued for at least 3 months before enrollment in the study. The Institutional Review Board of Hacettepe University Medical School approved all the studies, and each subject gave informed consent.

Study protocol

One of study investigators (B.O.Y.) evaluated all subjects using standardized forms, which included medical history and physical examination. Weight, height, waist and hip circumferences (waist: midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest, hip: widest circumference over the great trochanters) were measured. The body mass index [BMI; weight (kilograms)/height (meters)2] and waist to hip ratio (WHR) were calculated. An OGTT was performed between 0800–1000 h after a 3-d, 300-g carbohydrate diet and an overnight fast of 10–14 h. A 75-g oral glucose load was administered, and blood samples for glucose and insulin determinations were collected through an iv cannula at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Additional baseline blood samples were obtained for LH, FSH, testosterone (T), and DHEAS determinations in all subjects and for estradiol (E2) and androstenedione (A) measurements in female subjects. Blood sampling was performed between d 4 and 7 of the menstrual cycle in all women with regular cycles.

Assay methods

Blood samples were centrifuged immediately, and serum was stored at -20 C until assayed. Plasma glucose was measured by the glucose oxidase technique (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany). Insulin, LH, FSH, E2, T, A, and DHEAS were measured by RIA using commercially available kits. (ICN Biomedicals, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA). The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for insulin were 4.2% and 8.4%, respectively; for LH they were 2.4% and 7.3%, respectively; for FSH they were 4.0% and 5.9%, respectively; for E2 they were 5.5% and 5.5%, respectively; for T they were 9.6% and 11.6%, respectively; for A they were 4.3% and 6.0%, respectively; for DHEAS they were 9.0% and 9.5%, respectively.

Data analysis

Glucose tolerance was assessed by American Diabetes Association criteria (25). First degree relatives without impaired fasting glucose (IFG), IGT, or diabetes were termed NGT. In NGT first degree relatives and in all control subgroups, the insulin area under the curve during the OGTT (AUCinsulin) and fasting glucose to insulin ratio (FGI) were calculated. Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) (27) is applied by using the formula below:

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using the 9.0 PC package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). All parameters are shown as the mean ± SD. In families with multiple sisters or brothers, the data for sisters or brothers were averaged to produce one mean value per family. The t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used when appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The prevalence of any degree of glucose intolerance including the prestudy-diagnosed 3 mothers with type 2 diabetes was 49% (18 of 37) in the MothersPCOS group. Diabetes, IGT, and IFG alone were found in 6 of 37 (16%), 11 of 37 (30%), and 1 of 37 (3%) subjects in the MothersPCOS group, respectively. One patient with IGT in this group had also IFG. Three newly diagnosed diabetic patients in this group had normal fasting plasma glucose values during the OGTT.

The prevalence of any degree of glucose intolerance including the prestudy-diagnosed 2 fathers with type 2 diabetes was 58% (15 of 26) in the FathersPCOS group. Diabetes and IGT were diagnosed in 7 of 26 (27%), and 8 of 26 (31%) subjects in the FathersPCOS group, respectively. Of the 5 newly diagnosed diabetic patients, 1 had normal fasting plasma glucose, 2 had IFG, and 2 had fasting plasma glucose levels in diabetic range.

Diabetes was not present in the SistersPCOS and BrothersPCOS groups. IGT was noted in 1 of 19 (5%) subjects in the SistersPCOS group, and IFG was diagnosed in 1 of 25 (4%) subjects n the BrothersPCOS group.

The clinical and hormonal characteristics of MothersPCOS and ControlMothersPCOS groups are summarized in Table 1Go. The data are given for pre- and postmenopausal women separately. Both pre- and postmenopausal women in the MothersPCOS group had significantly higher WHR (P < 0.05 for both) and T (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) values than the respective control subgroups of ControlMothersPCOS. All other parameters were comparable between the two groups as well as between postmenopausal women in the MothersPCOS and postmenopausal women in the ControlMothersPCOS. There was a nonsignificant tendency toward increased LH levels in premenopausal women in the MothersPCOS group compared with the respective controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical and hormonal characteristics of the MothersPCOS and ControlMothersPCOS groups

 
The clinical and hormonal characteristics of SistersPCOS and ControlSistersPCOS groups are summarized in Table 2Go. The mean WHR was significantly higher in the SistersPCOS group than in the ControlSistersPCOS group (P < 0.01). The SistersPCOS group had significantly higher LH (P < 0.01), T (P < 0.001), A (P < 0.01), and DHEAS (P < 0.05) values than the ControlSistersPCOS group. The data for the SistersPCOS group were also compared with the data for the patients with PCOS in a separate analysis. The patients with PCOS had a mean ± SD age of 22.8 ± 5.1 yr. The mean ± SD values for LH, T, and DHEAS in this group were 12.2 ± 6.2 mIU/ml, 6.1 ± 2.0 nmol/liter, and 8.48 ± 2.82 µmol/liter, respectively. The mean ages were comparable between the two groups. The SistersPCOS group had significantly lower LH (P < 0.05), T (P < 0.001), and DHEAS (P < 0.01) values than the patients with PCOS.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Clinical and hormonal characteristics of the SistersPCOS and ControlSistersPCOS groups

 
When the PCOS was defined as the combination of oligomenorrhea and elevated T levels (2 SD above the respective control group’s mean values) (19), 3 of 19 (16%) sisters and 2 of 23 (8%) premenopausal mothers were found to have PCOS. Three (13%) premenopausal mothers had history of oligomenorrhea.

The clinical and hormonal characteristics of FathersPCOS, ControlFathersPCOS, BrothersPCOS, and ControlBrothersPCOS groups are summarized in Table 3Go. The mean anthropometric measurements and all androgen levels were comparable between FathersPCOS and ControlFathersPCOS groups as well as between BrothersPCOS and ControlBrothersPCOS groups. There was a nonsignificant tendency toward increased DHEAS values in the BrothersPCOS compared with controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Clinical and hormonal characteristics of the FathersPCOS, ControlFathersPCOS, BrothersPCOS, and ControlBrothersPCOS groups

 
Within the MothersPCOS group, the mean age, BMI, WHR, and androgen levels were comparable among subjects with NGT, IGT, and diabetes (data not given). This was also noted in the FathersPCOS group (data not given).

NGT subjects were compared with controls in a separate analysis (Tables 4Go and 5Go). The NGT MothersPCOS group had significantly higher WHR (P < 0.05), fasting insulin (FI; P < 0.05), HOMA IR (P < 0.05), and AUCinsulin (P < 0.01) and lower FGI (P < 0.05) values than the ControlMothersPCOS group. The NGT SistersPCOS group had significantly higher WHR (P < 0.01), FI (P < 0.05), HOMA IR (P < 0.01), and AUCinsulin (P < 0.05) and lower FGI (P < 0.01) values than the ControlSistersPCOS group (Table 4Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of NGT MothersPCOS, ControlMothersPCOS, NGT SistersPCOS, and ControlSistersPCOS groups

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of NGT FathersPCOS, ControlFathersPCOS, NGT BrothersPCOS, and ControlBrothersPCOS groups

 
All anthropometric measurements and IR parameters were comparable between NGT FathersPCOS and ControlFathersPCOS. The NGT BrothersPCOS group had significantly higher AUCinsulin (P < 0.01) values than the ControlBrothersPCOS group. All other IR parameters were comparable between the two groups (Table 5Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study the first degree relatives of women with PCOS had an increased prevalence of glucose intolerance and IR. Furthermore, the mothers and sisters of women with PCOS had higher androgen levels compared with the respective control groups. The combined prevalence rates for IGT and diabetes were 46% in the mothers and 58% in the fathers of women with PCOS. These figures were reported as 19.1% and 17% for women and men in similar age groups, respectively, in a population-based study from Turkey (28). Of note, all patients with IGT and 8 of 13 (62%) patients with diabetes were undiagnosed before the study, and of all those with newly diagnosed diabetes, 50% had normal fasting plasma glucose values. These findings emphasize that mothers and fathers of women with PCOS have a high risk of glucose intolerance, and in this group, OGTT should be considered to identify those who have impaired glucose homeostasis.

Age, BMI, WHR, and a first degree relative with glucose intolerance are reported to be the risk factors for glucose intolerance in PCOS, identical to the factors in other populations (29). Of interest, we could not find any difference in the mean age, BMI, WHR, or androgen levels between subjects with NGT and subjects with any degree of glucose intolerance in both the MothersPCOS and FathersPCOS groups. Therefore, key factors in the development of glucose intolerance in our study population remain to be determined.

Studies evaluating phenotypes in PCOS families demonstrated that hyperandrogenemia is a common finding in female first degree relatives of women with PCOS. Kahsar-Miller et al. (18) reported the rates of PCOS in mothers and sisters of patients with PCOS as 24% and 32%, respectively. The mean T, free T, and DHEAS values in affected first degree relatives were higher than those in controls (18). Legro et al. (19) showed that 22% of reproductive-aged sisters of women with PCOS fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of PCOS, whereas 24% had increased T and DHEAS values with regular menstrual cycles. Our data demonstrated that the mean T value in both pre- and postmenopausal women in the MothersPCOS group and the mean values of all androgens measured as well as mean LH value in the SistersPCOS group were significantly higher than those in the matched control groups, respectively. The prevalence rates for PCOS in sisters and mothers of patients with PCOS were 16% and 8%, respectively. Our study and those by Kahsar-Miller et al. (18) and Legro et al. (19) showed that female first degree relatives of patients with PCOS in different populations may have increased androgen levels compared with healthy controls. Women with hyperandrogenemia have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Compelling evidence suggests that androgens are powerful predictors of serious disease (30, 31). In the present study the MothersPCOS and SistersPCOS groups had significantly higher WHR values than healthy controls. It is also well recognized that the android pattern of fat distribution, characterized by increased WHR, is closely associated with cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes (32, 33). All of these data are consistent with the idea that mothers and sisters of women with PCOS may have metabolic derangements that will increase the risk of glucose intolerance and cardiovascular disease.

The mean values of gonadotropins and all androgens measured in our study were similar in FathersPCOS and ControlFathersPCOS groups. There has been a paucity of data in the literature regarding the androgen levels of fathers of women with PCOS. Our results are similar to the preliminary study by Norman et al. (20), which noted that the fathers of PCOS patients did not have increased androgen levels. In our study the BrothersPCOS group had similar gonadotropin and androgen values compared with the ControlBrothersPCOS group. Mean DHEAS appeared to be higher in the BrothersPCOS group, but the difference was not significant. Legro et al. (23) reported that the brothers of women with PCOS had significantly higher DHEAS levels than controls, whereas T, free T, and SHBG values were similar in the two groups. The BrothersPCOS group in our study was younger and had lower BMI values than the subjects in that report. The lack of difference in DHEAS levels between the brothers of women with PCOS and controls in our study may also result from type 2 error due to the relatively small sample size and the high variation.

The analyses of NGT family members in our study suggest that NGT mothers and sisters of women with PCOS have IR. The increased AUCinsulin values in brothers of women with PCOS may also indicate IR. We could not find statistically significant differences in the insulin levels between FathersPCOS and BrothersPCOS groups and their respective controls; however, these results might be due to type 2 error, because of the small sample size and the relatively large variation in insulin levels.

Our findings confirm the results of the preliminary study by Norman et al. (20), which suggested that hyperinsulinemia may be an important marker in family members of PCOS patients. IR is central to the pathogenesis of both type 2 diabetes and PCOS, with a strong genetic basis and important implications for the management of both disorders. IR and hyperinsulinemia are common antecedents of IGT and type 2 diabetes (34, 35). NGT first degree relatives of type 2 diabetic families are at increased risk of developing diabetes and have been studied to identify early metabolic abnormalities. IR and insulin secretory dysfunction have been found in these subjects (35). Taken together, these findings suggest that NGT first degree relatives of women with PCOS can be predicted to be at risk for development of glucose intolerance.

PCOS itself has been accepted as a major risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes (36). Diabetes screening in patients with PCOS is recommended according to the current American Diabetes Association guidelines (36). Although limited, the available evidence suggests that first degree relatives of PCOS patients may also have a high risk of glucose intolerance.

The failure of all family members of the 52 PCOS patients to participate is a limitation of our study. Selection bias due to phenotypic and metabolic differences between those family members who did and did not participate could not be ruled out.

We conclude that the first degree relatives of women with PCOS may form a specific subset of the population with increased prevalence of glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. Mothers and sisters of patients with PCOS have higher androgen levels than healthy controls, and NGT family members have insulin resistance. Further large scale, controlled family studies are warranted to delineate the risk of glucose intolerance and other metabolic complications as well as to propose screening and preventive strategies.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey.

Abbreviations: A, Androstenedione; AUC, area under the curve; BMI, body mass index; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone; E2, estradiol; FGI, fasting glucose to insulin ratio; FI, fasting insulin; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; IR, insulin resistance; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; T, testosterone; WHR, waist to hip ratio.

Received September 26, 2002.

Accepted February 10, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Franks S 1995 Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 333:853–861[Free Full Text]
  2. Knochenhauer ES, Key TJ, Kahsar-Miller M, Waggoner W, Boots LR, Azziz R 1998 Prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected black and white women of the southeastern United States: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3078–3082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Kouli CR, Bergiele AT, Filandra FA, Tsianateli TC, Spina GG, Zapanti ED, Bartzis MI 1999 A survey of the polycystic ovary syndrome in the Greek island of Lesbos: hormonal and metabolic profile. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4006–4011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Asuncion M, Calvo RM, San Millan JL, Sancho J, Avila S, Escobar-Morreale HF 2000 A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2434–2438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wild RA 2002 Long-term health consequences of PCOS. Hum Reprod Update 8:231–241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ehrmann DA, Barnes RB, Rosenfield RL, Cavaghan MK, Imperial J 1999 Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes Care 22:141–146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Legro RS, Kunselman AR, Dodson WC, Dunaif A 1999 Prevalence and predictors of risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective, controlled study in 254 affected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:165–169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dunaif A 1997 Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome: mechanism and implications for pathogenesis. Endocr Rev 18:774–800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ehrmann DA, Sturis J, Byrne MM, Karrison T, Rosenfield RL, Polonsky KS 1995 Insulin secretory defects in polycystic ovary syndrome. Relationship to insulin sensitivity and family history of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 96:520–527
  10. Dunaif A, Finegood DT 1996 ß-Cell dysfunction independent of obesity and glucose intolerance in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:942–947[Abstract]
  11. Legro RS, Spielman R, Urbanek M, Driscoll D, Strauss III JF, Dunaif A 1998 Phenotype and genotype in polycystic ovary syndrome. Recent Prog Horm Res 53:217–256
  12. Ferriman D, Purdie AW 1979 The inheritance of polycystic ovarian disease and a possible relationship to premature balding. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 11:291–300[Medline]
  13. Lunde O, Magnus P, Sandvik L, Hoglo S 1989 Familial clustering in the polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest 28:23–30[Medline]
  14. Hague WM, Adams J, Reeders ST, Peto TE, Jacobs HS 1988 Familial polycystic ovaries: a genetic disease? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 29:593–605[Medline]
  15. Carey AH, Chan KL, Short F, White D, Williamson R, Franks S 1993 Evidence for a single gene effect causing polycystic ovaries and male pattern baldness. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 38:653–658[Medline]
  16. Franks S, Gharani N, Waterworth D, Batty S, White D, Williamson R, McCarthy M 1997 The genetic basis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 12:2641–2648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Govind A, Obhrai MS, Clayton RN 1999 Polycystic ovaries are inherited as an autosomal dominant trait: analysis of 29 polycystic ovary syndrome and 10 control families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:38–43[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kahsar-Miller MD, Nixon C, Boots LR, Go RC, Azziz R 2001 Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in first-degree relatives of patients with PCOS. Fertil Steril 75:53–58[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Legro RS, Driscoll D, Strauss III JF, Fox J, Dunaif A 1998 Evidence for a genetic basis for hyperandrogenemia in polycystic ovary syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14956–14960[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Norman RJ, Masters S, Hague W 1996 Hyperinsulinemia is common in family members of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 66:942–947[Medline]
  21. Colilla S, Cox NJ, Ehrmann DA 2001 Heritability of insulin secretion and insulin action in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and their first degree relatives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2027–2031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Legro RS, Bentley-Lewis R, Driscoll D, Wang SC, Dunaif A 2002 Insulin resistance in the sisters of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: association with hyperandrogenemia rather than menstrual irregularity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2128–2133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Legro RS, Kunselman AR, Demers L, Wang SC, Bentley-Lewis R, Dunaif A 2002 Elevated dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels as the reproductive phenotype in the brothers of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2134–2138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Elbein SC 2000 Genetics of type 2 diabetes: an overview for the millennium. Diabetes Technol Ther 2:391–400[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus 1997 Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 20:1183–1197[Medline]
  26. Hatch R, Rosenfield RL, Kim MH, Tredway D 1981 Hirsutism: implications, etiology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 140:815–830[Medline]
  27. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC 1985 Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28:412–429[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Kelestimur F, Cetin M, Pasaoglu H, Coksevim B, Cetinkaya F, Unluhizarci K, Unal S, Koker AH 1999 The prevalence and identification of risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in Kayseri, central Anatolia, Turkey. Acta Diabetol 36:85–91[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Legro RS 2001 Diabetes prevalence and risk factors in polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 28:99–109[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Bjorntorp P 1996 The android woman: a risky condition. J Intern Med 239:105–110[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Wild RA, Grubb B, Hartz A, Van Nort JJ, Bachman W, Bartholomew M 1990 Clinical signs of androgen excess as risk factors for coronary artery disease. Fertil Steril 54:255–259[Medline]
  32. Bjorntorp P 1988 The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease. Acta Med Scand 723(Suppl):121–134
  33. Pi-Sunyer FX 1991 Health implications of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 53:1595S–1603S
  34. Weyer C, Tataranni PA, Bogardus C, Pratley RE 2001 Insulin resistance and insulin secretory dysfunction are independent predictors of worsening of glucose tolerance during each stage of type 2 diabetes development. Diabetes Care 24:89–94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Haffner SM, Miettinen H, Gaskill SP, Stern MP 1995 Decreased insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance are independently related to the 7-year risk of NIDDM in Mexican-Americans. Diabetes 44:1386–1391[Abstract]
  36. American Diabetes Association 2002 Screening for diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:21–24



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. D. Coviello, S. Sam, R. S. Legro, and A. Dunaif
High Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in First-Degree Male Relatives of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Is Related to High Rates of Obesity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4361 - 4366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Biyasheva, R. S. Legro, A. Dunaif, and M. Urbanek
Evidence for Association between Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and TCF7L2 and Glucose Intolerance in Women with PCOS and TCF7L2
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2009; 94(7): 2617 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Padmanabhan
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome -- "A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery inside an Enigma"
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 1883 - 1885.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Mukherjee, N. Shaikh, S. Khavale, G. Shinde, P. Meherji, N. Shah, and A. Maitra
Genetic variation in exon 17 of INSR is associated with insulin resistance and hyperandrogenemia among lean Indian women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2009; 160(5): 855 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. E. Recabarren, T. Sir-Petermann, R. Rios, M. Maliqueo, B. Echiburu, R. Smith, P. Rojas-Garcia, M. Recabarren, and R. A. Rey
Pituitary and Testicular Function in Sons of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome from Infancy to Adulthood
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3318 - 3324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Sam, A. D. Coviello, Y.-A. Sung, R. S. Legro, and A. Dunaif
Metabolic Phenotype in the Brothers of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1237 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. F. Witchel
Ontogeny of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Creative Approach
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1576 - 1578.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. E. Recabarren, R. Smith, R. Rios, M. Maliqueo, B. Echiburu, E. Codner, F. Cassorla, P. Rojas, and T. Sir-Petermann
Metabolic Profile in Sons of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1820 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Urbanek, S. Sam, R. S. Legro, and A. Dunaif
Identification of a Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Susceptibility Variant in Fibrillin-3 and Association with a Metabolic Phenotype
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4191 - 4198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Hahn, M. Backhaus, M. Broecker-Preuss, S. Tan, T. Dietz, R. Kimmig, M. Schmidt, K. Mann, and O. E Janssen
Retinol-binding protein 4 levels are elevated in polycystic ovary syndrome women with obesity and impaired glucose metabolism
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 157(2): 201 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Azziz, E. Carmina, D. Dewailly, E. Diamanti-Kandarakis, H. F. Escobar-Morreale, W. Futterweit, O. E. Janssen, R. S. Legro, R. J. Norman, A. E. Taylor, et al.
Criteria for Defining Polycystic Ovary Syndrome as a Predominantly Hyperandrogenic Syndrome: An Androgen Excess Society Guideline
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4237 - 4245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. Ojaniemi and M. Pugeat
An adolescent with polycystic ovary syndrome
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(suppl_1): S149 - S152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Sam, R. S. Legro, P. A. Essah, T. Apridonidze, and A. Dunaif
Evidence for metabolic and reproductive phenotypes in mothers of women with polycystic ovary syndrome
PNAS, May 2, 2006; 103(18): 7030 - 7035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. I. Leibel, E. E. Baumann, M. Kocherginsky, and R. L. Rosenfield
Relationship of Adolescent Polycystic Ovary Syndrome to Parental Metabolic Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1275 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Villuendas, J. I. Botella-Carretero, B. Roldan, J. Sancho, H. F. Escobar-Morreale, and J. L. S. Millan
Polymorphisms in the insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) gene and the insulin receptor substrate-2 (IRS-2) gene influence glucose homeostasis and body mass index in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and non-hyperandrogenic controls
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3184 - 3191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Vural, E. Caliskan, E. Turkoz, T. Kilic, and A. Demirci
Evaluation of metabolic syndrome frequency and premature carotid atherosclerosis in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2409 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Sam, R. S. Legro, R. Bentley-Lewis, and A. Dunaif
Dyslipidemia and Metabolic Syndrome in the Sisters of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4797 - 4802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
H. F. Escobar-Morreale, M. Luque-Ramirez, and J. L. San Millan
The Molecular-Genetic Basis of Functional Hyperandrogenism and the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2005; 26(2): 251 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Raskauskiene, P. W. Jones, A. Govind, M. Obhrai, and R. N. Clayton
Do Polycystic Ovaries on Ultrasound Scan Indicate Decreased Insulin Sensitivity in Sisters of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2063 - 2067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. A. Ehrmann, K. Kasza, R. Azziz, R. S. Legro, M. N. Ghazzi, and for the PCOS/Troglitazone Study Group
Effects of Race and Family History of Type 2 Diabetes on Metabolic Status of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. M. Bruns, S. T. Baum, R. J. Colman, J. R. Eisner, J. W. Kemnitz, R. Weindruch, and D. H. Abbott
Insulin Resistance and Impaired Insulin Secretion in Prenatally Androgenized Male Rhesus Monkeys
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6218 - 6223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. S. Petermann, A. Cartes, M. Maliqueo, D. Vantman, C. Gutierrez, H. Toloza, B. Echiburu, and S.E. Recabarren
Patterns of hormonal response to the GnRH agonist leuprolide in brothers of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a pilot study
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2742 - 2747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Orio Jr., S. Palomba, T. Cascella, B. De Simone, S. Di Biase, T. Russo, D. Labella, F. Zullo, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao
Early Impairment of Endothelial Structure and Function in Young Normal-Weight Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4588 - 4593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. L. San Millan, M. Corton, G. Villuendas, J. Sancho, B. Peral, and H. F. Escobar-Morreale
Association of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome with Genomic Variants Related to Insulin Resistance, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Obesity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2640 - 2646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
D. J. Salmi, H. C. Zisser, and L. Jovanovic
Screening for and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Teenagers
Experimental Biology and Medicine, May 1, 2004; 229(5): 369 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Bayraktar, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yildiz, B. O.
Right arrow Articles by Bayraktar, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals