help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, T.
Right arrow Articles by Arnaldi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, T.
Right arrow Articles by Arnaldi, G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 5 1994-1998
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Functional and Nonfunctional Adrenocortical Tumors Demonstrate a High Responsiveness to Low-Dose Adrenocorticotropin

Tatiana Mancini, Blerina Kola, Franco Mantero and Giorgio Arnaldi

Division of Endocrinology (T.M., B.K., G.A.), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ancona, 60100 Ancona, Italy; and Division of Endocrinology (F.M.), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Padua, 35100 Padua, Italy

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Giorgio Arnaldi, Clinica di Endocrinologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Umberto I, Sede Torrette, 60100 Ancona, Italy. E-mail: arnaldi.giorgio{at}libero.it, g.arnaldi{at}ao-umbertoprimo.marche.it.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs) demonstrate exquisite sensitivity to endogenous ACTH. We previously showed an ACTH receptor overexpression in APAs compared with the other adrenal tumors.

To evaluate the meaning of such findings, we investigated the response of aldosterone, cortisol, and 17OH progesterone (17OHP) to 1 µg ACTH in 42 patients with adrenocortical tumors (23 NHAs, 9 APAs, and 10 CPAs) and 10 normal subjects (C). All 52 subjects were responsive to ACTH, and hormone peak levels were reached at 30 min. The aldosterone peak level was significantly higher in APAs [mean ± SEM: 84.3 ± 13.1 ng/dl (2335.1 ± 362.9 pmol/liter)] than in other tumors and control (C). Cortisol peak levels was higher in CPAs [37.1 ± 3.9 µg/dl (1023.9 ± 107.6 nmol/liter)] than in NHAs (P < 0.01), in C (P < 0.01) and in APAs (P = n.s.). 17OHP peak levels were significantly higher in patients with adrenocortical tumors toward C.

In summary: 1) low-dose ACTH induces an important stimulation in all tumors, suggesting preservation of high responsiveness to ACTH; 2) this is especially true for aldosterone in APA and could be of primary importance when performing diagnostic tests for hyperaldosteronism; and 3) 17OHP-hyperresponsiveness to low-dose ACTH is the most common alteration both in functional and nonfunctional tumors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE ROLE OF ACTH in the physiological regulation of aldosterone secretion is not as important as the renin-angiotensin system or serum potassium concentrations.

Physiologically, administration of an iv bolus of ACTH is associated with a brisk rise in serum aldosterone levels. The prolonged administration of pharmacological amounts of ACTH has been shown to produce an initial increase with a subsequent decline in aldosterone secretion. When physiological concentrations of ACTH are maintained in plasma, the zona glomerulosa responds in a parallel manner to that of the zona fasciculate (1, 2, 3).

Al least one variety of hyperaldosteronism, glucocorticoid-suppressible aldosteronism, appears to be related to ACTH, and it can be promptly reversed by administration of small doses of dexamethasone. In aldosterone-producing adenomas (APAs), the tumor tends to demonstrate exquisite sensitivity to endogenous ACTH. This is reflected in several phenomena including parallel changes in plasma aldosterone levels with the circadian fluxes of plasma ACTH and the increase in aldosterone levels following an ACTH infusion (4, 5, 6, 7).

In summary, whereas ACTH plays a minimal role in the day-to-day regulation of aldosterone secretion, in some pathological states it may assume a significant role.

The presence of ACTH receptor mRNA in both functioning and nonfunctioning adrenocortical tumors has been demonstrated (8, 9). In our previous study, an RT-PCR quantitative evaluation of its distribution showed an overexpression in APAs, whereas cortisol-producing adenomas (CPAs) and nonhypersecreting adenomas (NHAs) showed an ACTH receptor expression similar to that of normal adrenal tissue (9).

To evaluate the functional meaning of such findings, with the present study we tried to systematically investigate the responsiveness to acute ACTH stimulation in different adrenocortical tumors with an in vivo study.

The ACTH test is widely used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency, but the optimal dose that has to be administered is still a matter of debate. In the classical ACTH test, a dose of 250 µg ACTH 1–24 (tetracosactin) is administered, but it has been well known for many years that this is a supramaximal dose. In the present study, we have chosen a low dose of ACTH 1–24 (1 µg) because it is more physiological for the assessment of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis functionality (10, 11, 12).


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects (Table 1Go)

Forty-two patients (25 women and 17 men, aged 18–81 yr) with an adrenocortical tumor were studied over the last 5 yr and were evaluated before the start of any treatment. Twenty-three patients had an NHA, 9 an APA, and 10 a CPA. The clinical data of patients are reported in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical data of patients with adrenal tumor

 
Patients with APA were hypertensive, with an elevated upright plasma aldosterone/plasma renin activity (PRA) ratio and failure of aldosterone suppression by a saline (0.9% NaCl) load (2 liters in 4 h). All of them presented adrenal tumors ranging from 1.5–3.5 cm with a mean size 2.1 ± 0.3 cm at computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. They had normal basal ACTH levels. Hypokaliemia (K < 3.5 mEq/liter) was present in six patients.

All patients with CPA had typical signs and symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome such as elevated urinary free cortisol excretion, absent cortisol rhythm, lack of suppression of cortisol after dexamethasone (1 mg) and suppressed basal levels of ACTH. The adrenal tumor size, evaluated with a CT or MRI scan, was 2.9 ± 0.5 cm (mean ± SEM) ranging from 2–3.8 cm.

We also evaluated 23 adrenal NHAs incidentally discovered by noninvasive abdominal imaging techniques performed for reasons other than suspected adrenal disease. The adrenal tumor size at CT or MRI was 3.0 ± 0.4 cm (mean ± SEM) ranging to 1.5–10 cm. Inclusion criteria were: 1) absence of specific signs and/or symptoms of hormone excess; 2) normal tests of HPA axis or no more than one abnormal test; 3) morphological aspect of the tumor suggesting the presence of a cortical adenoma (round shape with smooth edges, homogeneous with relatively low density; Ref.13). All subjects received an extensive endocrine evaluation (clinical and hormonal) before being included in the NHA, to exclude a functioning adrenal tumor. Baseline data included determination of urinary free cortisol, plasma ACTH, serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, serum 17OH progesterone (17OHP), serum testosterone, upright plasma aldosterone/PRA, urinary catecholamines excretion, plasma cortisol rhythm. Dynamic tests included overnight 1 mg and 8 mg dexamethasone test and CRH test in some cases.

Ten healthy control (C) subjects (10 women, mean age 34 ± 4; range 18–70 yr) with no chronic diseases were also recruited over the same period of time.

Full informed consent was obtained from each subjects and the study was approved by our local Ethics Committee.

Study design

Vials containing 250 µg of ACTH 1–24 (tetracosactin, Synacthen) were purchased from Novartis-Pharma (Huningue, France). To prepare a dose of 1 µg, 250 µg of ACTH were diluted in 100 ml saline and 9 ml of saline were added to 1 ml of this solution; 4 ml of this final solution were injected iv. A butterfly needle was positioned in an antecubital vein and blood samples for cortisol, aldosterone, and 17OHP assay were collected at baseline (0 min) and then 30 and 60 min after the ACTH injection. Dilutions of ACTH were done by the same nurse, supervised by one of the doctors involved in the study, avoiding any loss of ACTH material. For ACTH collection, plastic tubes were used so that no protein was necessary for prevention of ACTH glass absorption.

Basal levels were also evaluated 30 min after positioning the needle (-30 min). The patient was in a recumbent position during the test. The test was performed in the morning, starting at 0830–0900 h after an overnight fast. No side effects were recorded after ACTH administration.

Cycling women were studied in the follicular phase. All patients were on normal sodium intake as monitored by urinary sodium excretion and were not receiving any drug therapy interfering with hormonal evaluation.

Hormone peak levels and percentage rise ({Delta} = [(peak levels/basal levels) x 100] - 100) were evaluated.

Hormone assays

Serum cortisol (µg/dl) was measured by chemiluminescence (Immulite, Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were 9.0% and 10.3% respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.2 µg/dl.

Serum aldosterone (picograms/milliliter) was measured by RIA (Aldosterone Maia, Biodata Diagnostics, Guidonia, Italy). The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were 5.4% and 6.38%, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 6.0 pg/ml.

Serum 17OHP (ng/ml) was measured by RIA (Coat-A-Count, Diagnostic Products Corp.). The intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were 6.7% and 11%, respectively. The sensitivity of the assay was 0.07 ng/ml.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparison between groups were made by ANOVA. Post hoc analysis (Fisher’s protected least significance) and Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple means comparison.

Correlations were evaluated by Spearman analysis. Levels of statistical significance were set at P < 0.05. Statistical analysis were performed with the Statview 4.1 statistical package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
All 52 subjects were responsive to ACTH; and aldosterone, cortisol, and 17OHP peak levels were reached at 30 min.

Peak levels and percentage rises for each hormone were higher in 42 patients with adrenocortical tumors (ATs; all adrenal masses included) than in C subjects even if significance was reached only for 17OHP peak levels [mean ± SEM: 8.0 ± 0.8 ng/ml (26.4 ± 2.7 nmol/liter) in AT vs. 2.9 ± 0.3 ng/ml (9.6 ± 0.9 nmol/liter) in C, P = 0.007].

Aldosterone response to ACTH test

Both basal and peak aldosterone levels were significantly higher in APA than in other groups (Fig. 1Go). The aldosterone basal level (mean ± SEM) was 33.1 ± 2.4 ng/dl (916.9 ± 66.5 pmol/liter) in APA vs. 7.8 ± 1.6 ng/dl (216.1 ± 44.3 pmol/liter) in CPA, 9.5 ± 1.1 ng/dl (263.1 ± 30.5 pmol/liter) in NHA and 11.6 ± 1.7 ng/dl (321.3 ± 47.0 pmol/liter) in C (P < 0.0001). The aldosterone peak level (mean ± SEM) was 84.3 ± 13.1 ng/dl (2335.1 ± 362.9 pmol/liter) in APA vs. 23.6 ± 6.8 ng/dl (728.5 ± 188.4 pmol/liter) in CPA, 25.1 ± 3.1 ng/dl (695.3 ± 85.9 pmol/liter) in NHA, and 26.2 ± 5.3 ng/dl (725.8 ± 146.8 pmol/liter) in C (P < 0.001).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean (±SEM) plasma aldosterone response after 1 µg 1–24 ACTH in APAs, in C, in CPAs, and in NHAs. Conversion factor to SI units: 27.7.

 
When percentage rise of aldosterone (mean ± SEM) was considered, there was no difference between APA (151 ± 32%) and the other tumors (211 ± 45% in NHA; 196 ± 41% in CPA). The percentage rise of aldosterone (mean ± SEM) was higher in AT (183 ± 24%) than in C subjects (129 ± 31%), even though significance was not reached.

Cortisol response to ACTH test

CPA had higher cortisol basal levels than other groups even if significance was not reached (Fig. 2Go) [mean ± SEM: 18.0 ± 3.8 µg/dl (496.8 ± 104.9 nmol/liter) in CPA, 12.3 ± 1.0 µg/dl (339.5 ± 27.6 nmol/liter) in APA, 10.6 ± 1.0 µg/dl (292.6 ± 27.6 nmol/liter) in NHA, 13.7 ± 2.4 µg/dl (378.1 ± 66.3 nmol/liter) in C].



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Mean (±SEM) plasma cortisol response after 1 µg 1–24 ACTH in APAs, in C, in CPAs, and in NHAs. Conversion factor to SI units: 27.6.

 
Cortisol peak levels were higher in CPA (mean ± SEM: 37.1 ± 3.9 µg/dl) than in the other groups (Fig. 2Go) [mean ± SEM: 30.7 ± 1.5 µg/dl (847.3 ± 41.4 nmol/liter) in APA: P = n.s.; 28.7 ± 1.3 µg/dl (792.1 ± 35.8 nmol/liter) in NHA: P < 0.01; 28.2 ± 2.8 µg/dl (778.3 ± 77.3 nmol/liter) in C: P < 0.01].

A high degree of cortisol percentage response after ACTH administration was observed in all groups, ranging from 148–293%. Patients with NHA had a higher but not significant cortisol percentage rise (mean ± SEM: 293 ± 99%) than other groups (mean ± SEM: APA = 162 ± 22%, CPA = 148 ± 36%, C = 153 ± 42%).

17OHP response to ACTH test

17OHP basal levels were lower in healthy C subjects [0.9 ± 0.1 ng/ml (2.9 ± 0.3 nmol/liter)] vs. both patients with AT considered as a single group [1.7 ± 0.2 ng/ml (5.6 ± 0.6 nmol/liter)] and vs. each type of tumor considered separately, although significance was not reached [mean ± SEM: 2.2 ± 0.4 ng/ml (7.3 ± 1.3 nmol/liter) in APA, 2.1 ± 1.0 ng/ml (7.0 ± 3.3 nmol/liter) in CPA, 1.4 ± 0.2 ng/ml (4.6 ± 0.7 nmol/liter) in NHA, 0.9 ± 0.1 ng/ml (3.0 ± 0.3 nmol/liter) in C].

17OHP peak levels were significantly higher in patients with adrenocortical tumors respect to normal subjects [Fig. 3Go; mean ± SEM, C = 2.9 ± 0.4 ng/ml (9.6 ± 1.3 nmol/liter); APA, 7.2 ± 1.4 ng/ml (23.8 ± 4.6 nmol/liter), P = 0.05 vs. C; CPA, 8.3 ± 1.6 ng/ml (27.4 ± 5.3 nmol/liter), P = 0.01 vs. C; NHA, 8.5 ± 1.1 ng/ml (28.0 ± 3.6 nmol/liter), P < 0.002 vs. C].



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean (±SEM) plasma 17OHP response after 1 µg 1–24 ACTH in APAs, in C, in CPAs, and in NHAs. Conversion factor to SI units: 3.3.

 
Within adrenocortical tumors, NHA showed a 17OHP percentage rise higher than APA (mean ± SEM: 1345 ± 372% vs. 348 ± 150%, P = 0.05) and slightly higher than CPA (mean ± SEM: 1345 ± 372% vs. 661 ± 209%; P = n.s.).

Interestingly, the percentage of adrenal tumors with 17OHP hyperresponsiveness to low-dose ACTH was very high: 24% (10/42) with a cut-off more than 10 ng/ml and 57% (24/42) with a cut-off more than 5 ng/ml.

Such hyperresponsiveness was present in both functional and nonfunctional adrenal tumors: APA 22% (2/9), CPA 33% (3/9); NHA 22% (5/23; cut-off more than 10 ng/ml); APA 55% (5/9), CPA 55% (5/9); NHA 61% (14/23; cut-off more than 5 ng/ml).

In normal subjects and in patients with adrenocortical tumors, we found a correlation between cortisol and 17OHP peak levels after ACTH (respectively r = 0.3, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.4 and P < 0.0001); this correlation persisted when the groups were considered separately (CPA: r = 0.8, P < 0.0001; APA: r = 0.6; P < 0.0001; NHA: r = 0.3, P < 0.0001).

Tumor size and hormone responses to ACTH

When we considered the size of the tumors and the hormonal changes after ACTH stimulation, a correlation was found only between cortisol or 17OHP peak levels and the size of CPA (r = 0.8, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.6, P = 0.02 respectively).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is widely accepted that the 250 µg ACTH dose, used for testing the HPA axis, exerts a supramaximal stimulation of adrenal function. In fact, there is evidence that a maximal cortisol response is coupled with plasma ACTH levels as low as 13–14 pmol/liter (11). Because the literature data have widely proved that 1 µg ACTH is the lowest dose that provokes a maximum cortisol secretion, similar to that recorded after 250 µg ACTH (10, 11, 12), we selected to use 1 µg ACTH dose to explore the responsiveness of normal and pathological adrenal glands.

It is well known that cortisol and aldosterone response to various doses of ACTH and in particular to 1 µg is independent of gender and/or age, whereas dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and {Delta}-androstenedione response is reduced with aging in both sexes (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). A reduced response in elderly subjects was shown only for very low ACTH dose (0.06 µg; Ref.16).

Our results show that low-dose ACTH induces an important stimulation of cortisol, aldosterone and 17OHP in all patients with functional and nonfunctional adrenal tumors, suggesting that these tumors preserve a high sensitivity to ACTH, which is the most physiological stimulus.

Hormone response patterns (see Figs. 1–3GoGoGo) seem to be similar. In fact, cortisol, aldosterone, and 17OHP responses to ACTH were synchronous with a peak level reached at 30 min both in normal subjects and in patients with adrenocortical tumors.

The secretion of aldosterone in APA appears to be ACTH dependent. In fact, in patients with APA, aldosterone secretion is synchronous with cortisol circadian variations, regardless of posture, and these aldosterone changes are probably mediated by ACTH (4, 5, 6). In agreement with these observations, we have seen in APA the highest expression of ACTH receptor mRNA (9) and, in the present study, the highest aldosterone peak level and the greatest AUC. ACTH receptor hyperexpression and/or different aldosterone synthase sensitivity due to gene polymorphisms, could be possible mechanisms of aldosterone ACTH dependence (20, 21).

For these reasons, the simultaneous evaluation of cortisol and aldosterone could be of primary importance when performing diagnostic tests for hyperaldosteronism. This is especially important not only in long tests (for example, saline load) in which the circadiam rhythm could influence the results, but also in short tests (aldosterone/PRA ratio, orthostatism) in which acute stress could stimulate ACTH secretion.

In cultured human adrenocortical cells, ACTH receptors are positively regulated by ACTH (22) but on the contrary, CPA show normal (9) or even high (8, 23) expression of ACTH receptors in spite of chronic ACTH suppression. Furthermore, the sharp cortisol response to ACTH, observed in our patients with CPA, confirms the preservation of adrenal ACTH receptor activity in primary hypercortisolism where circulating ACTH levels are greatly reduced (mean value <10 pg/ml).

An exaggerated 17OHP response to ACTH test is probably the most common endocrine alteration observed in patients with adrenal incidentaloma (17–71% of patients) (24). Our results show that approximately 25% of patients with adrenal tumors present a 17OHP hyperresponsiveness (cut-off = 10 ng/ml) to low-dose ACTH. The interpretation of ACTH tests is sometimes controversial and an exaggerated response of 17OHP is not specific for 21-hydroxylase deficiency and could be merely a sign of altered intratumoral steroidogenesis. Several studies have failed to find the presence of CYP21 mutations in patients with adrenal tumors, suggesting that 21-hydroxylase deficiency is not implicated in the pathogenesis of most of such tumors (25, 26, 27). The disappearance of 17OHP hyperresponsiveness after removal of the tumor in a series of our patients (our unpublished data) may suggest that this phenomenon is not related to a genomic mutation of CYP21 but to an intrinsic feature of the tumor itself. Recently, these data have been refuted by Patócs et al. (28) and Baumgartner-Parzer et al. (29), whose studies do not rule out that CYP21 mutations may play a role in the pathogenesis of adrenal incidentalomas.

An interesting finding of our present study is the demonstration of an increased response of 17OHP to low-dose ACTH, not only in patients with nonfunctional tumors, but also in APA and CPA. This could be due to an increased cell mass effect, although it is possible that functional adrenal tumors also may harbor an intratumoral defect in the steroidal pathways leading to an increase not only of 17OHP but of the other steroid precursors, too. These results are in agreement with the data furnished by Tóth et al. (30).

In summary, our data show that: 1) low-dose ACTH induces an important stimulation of cortisol, aldosterone, and 17OHP in all patients with functional and nonfunctional adrenal tumors, suggesting that these tumors preserve a high responsiveness to ACTH; 2) this is especially true for the secretion of aldosterone in APA, and this finding could be of primary importance when performing diagnostic tests for hyperaldosteronism; and 3) 17OHP hyperresponsiveness to low dose of ACTH is the most common alteration both in functional and nonfunctional tumors; this is not a specific aspect of NHA as previously thought.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Prof. Robert Collu for critical review of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
This work was partially supported by grant from Ministero dell’ Istruzione, dell’ Università e della Ricerca (Grant 200106 2719) and Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (to F.M.).

Abbreviations: 17OHP, 17OH progesterone; APA, aldosterone-producing adenoma; AT, adrenocortical tumor; C, control; CPA, cortisol-producing adenoma; CT, computed tomography; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NHA, nonhypersecreting adenoma; PRA, plasma renin activity.

Received October 23, 2002.

Accepted January 27, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Griffing GT, Pratt H, Melby JC 1985 Biphasic plasma aldosterone responses to four single-dose ACTH regimes. J Clin Pharmacol 25:387–389[Abstract]
  2. Nicholls MG, Espiner EA, Donald RA 1975 Plasma aldosterone response to low dose ACTH stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 41:186–188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kem DC, Gomez-Sanchez C, Kramer NJ, Holland OB, Higgins JR 1975 Plasma aldosterone and renin activity response to ACTH infusion in dexamethasone-suppressed normal and sodium-depleted man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 40:116–124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Schambelan M, Brust NL, Chang BCF, Slater KL, Biglieri EG 1975 Circadian Rhythm and effect of posture on plasma aldosterone concentration in primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 43:115–131
  5. Kater CE, Biglieri EG, Brust N, Chang B, Hirai J, Irony I 1989 Stimulation and suppression of the mineralcorticoid hormones in normal subjects and adrenocortical disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 10:149–164
  6. Kem D, Weinberger MH, Higging JR, Kramer NJ, Gomez-Sanches C, Holland B 1978 Plasma aldosterone response to ACTH in primary aldosteronism and in patients with low renin hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 46:552–560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Stowasser M, Klemm SA, Tunny TJ, Gordon RD 1995 Plasma aldosterone response to ACTH in subtypes of primary aldosteronism. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 22:460–462[Medline]
  8. Reincke M, Beuschlein F, Latronico AC, Arlt W, Chrousos GP, Allolio B 1997 Expression of adrenocorticotrophic hormone receptor mRNA in human adrenocortical neoplasms: correlation with P450scc expression. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 46:619–626[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Arnaldi G, Mancini V, Costantini C, Giovagnetti M, Petrelli M, Masini, Bertagna X, Mantero F 1998 ACTH receptor mRNA in human adrenocortical tumors: overexpression in aldosteronomas. Endocr Res 24:845–849[Medline]
  10. Dickstein G, Spigel D, Arad E, Sheehner C 1997 One microgram is the lowest ACTH dose to cause a maximal cortisol response. There is no diurnal variation of cortisol response to submaximal ACTH stimulation. Eur J Endocrinol 137:172–175[Abstract]
  11. Oelkers W, Boelke T, Bahr V, Exner P, Faust B, Harendt H 1988 Dose-response relationships between plasma adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), cortisol, aldosterone and 18-hydroxy corticosterone after injection of ACTH (1–39) or human corticotropin. releasing hormone in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:181–186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Streeten DHP 1999 Editorial: shortcomings in the low-dose (1 µg) ACTH test for the diagnosis of ACTH deficiency states. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:835–837[Free Full Text]
  13. Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G, Osella G, Masini AM, Ali A, Giovagnetti M, Opocher G, Angeli A 2000 A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:637–644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Roberts NA, Barton RN, Horan MA 1990 Ageing and the sensitivity of the adrenal gland to physiological doses of ACTH in man. J Endocrinol 126:507–513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ohashi M, Kato K, Nawata H, Ibayashi H 1986 Adrenocortical responsiveness to graded ACTH infusions in normal young and elderly human subjects. Gerontology 32:43–51[Medline]
  16. Giordano R, Di Vito L, Lanfranco F, Broglio F, Benso A, Gianotti L, Grottoli S, Ghigo E, Arvat E 2001 Elderly subjects show severe impairment of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and reduced sensitivity of cortisol and aldosterone response to the stimulatory effect of ACTH(1–24). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 55:259–265[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Arvat E, Di Vito L, Lanfranco F, Maccario M, Baffoni C, Rossetto R, Aimaretti G, Camanni F, Ghigo E 2000 Stimulatory effect of adrenocorticotropin on cortisol, aldosterone, and dehydroepiandrosterone secretion in normal humans: dose-response study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:3141–3146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Parker Jr CR, Slayden SM, Azziz R, Crabbe SL, Hines GA, Boots LR, Bae S 2000 Effects of aging on adrenal function in the human: responsiveness and sensitivity of adrenal androgens and cortisol to adrenocorticotropin in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:48–54[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ferrari E, Cravello L, Muzzoni B, Casarotti D, Paltro M, Solerte SB, Fioravanti M, Cuzzoni G, Pontiggia B, Magri F 2001 Age-related changes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: pathophysiological correlates. Eur J Endocrinol 44:319–329
  20. Davies E, Holloway CD, Ingram MC, Friel EC, Inglis GC, Swan L, Hillis WS, Fraser R, Connell JM 2001 An influence of variation in the aldosterone synthase gene (CYP11B2) on corticosteroid responses to ACTH in normal human subjects. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54:813–817[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Inglis GC, Plouin PF, Friel EC, Davies E, Fraser R, Connell JM 2001 Polymorphic differences from normal in the aldosterone synthase gene (CYP11B2) in patients with primary hyperaldosteronism and adrenal tumour (Conn’s syndrome). Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54:725–730[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Lebrethon MC, Naville D, Begeot M, Saez JM 1994 Regulation of corticotropin receptor number and messenger RNA in cultured human adrenocortical cells by corticotropin and angiotensin II. J Clin Invest 93:1828–1833
  23. Beuschlein F, Fassnacht M, Klink A, Allolio B, Reincke M, Tóth M 2001 ACTH-receptor expression, regulation and role in adrenocortical tumor formation. Eur J Endocrinol 144:199–206[Abstract]
  24. Mantero F, Arnaldi G 1999 Investigation protocol: adrenal enlargement. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 50:141–146[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kjellman M, Holst M, Backdahl M, Larsson C, Farnebo LO, Wedell A 1999 No overrepresentation of congenital adrenal hyperplasia in patients with adrenocortical tumors. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 50:343–346[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Beuschlein F, Schulze E, Moro P, Gensheimer HP, Maser-Gluth C, Allolio B, Reincke M 1998 Steroid 21-hydroxylase mutation and 21-hydroxylase mRNA expression in human adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2585–2588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Reincke M, Peter M, Sippell WG, Allolio B Impairment of 11 ß-hydroxylase but not 21-hydroxylase in adrenal "incidentaloma." Eur J Endocrinol 136:196–200
  28. Patócs A, Tóth M, Barta C, Sasvári-Székely M, Varga I, Szücs N, Jakab C, Gláz E, Rácz K 2002 Hormonal evaluation and mutation screening for steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency in patients with unilateral and bilateral adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol 147:349–355[Abstract]
  29. Baumgartner-Parzer SM, Pauschenwein S, Waldhäusl W, Pölzler K, Nowotny P, Vierhapper H 2002 Increased prevalence of heterozygous 21-OH germline mutations in patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Clin Endocrinol 56:881–886
  30. Tóth M, Rácz K, Adleff V, Varga I, Fütö, Jakab C, Karlinger K, Kiss R, Gláz E 2000 Comparative analysis of plasma 17hydroxyprogesterone and cortisol responses to ACTH in patients with various adrenal tumors before and after unilateral adrenalectomy. J Endocr Invest 23:287–294[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
P. Ye, B. Mariniello, F. Mantero, H. Shibata, and W. E Rainey
G-protein-coupled receptors in aldosterone-producing adenomas: a potential cause of hyperaldosteronism
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 195(1): 39 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Assie, C. Auzan, J.-M. Gasc, E. Baviera, A. Balaton, J.-M. Elalouf, X. Jeunemaitre, P.-F. Plouin, P. Corvol, and E. Clauser
Steroidogenesis in Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma Revisited by Transcriptome Analysis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2005; 90(12): 6638 - 6649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Thorin-Savoure, F. Tissier-Rible, L. Guignat, A. Pellerin, X. Bertagna, J. Bertherat, and H. Lefebvre
Collision/Composite Tumors of the Adrenal Gland: A Pitfall of Scintigraphy Imaging and Hormone Assays in the Detection of Adrenal Metastasis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4924 - 4929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, T.
Right arrow Articles by Arnaldi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mancini, T.
Right arrow Articles by Arnaldi, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals