help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, W.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 4 1798-1803
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Genome-Wide Scan of Graves’ Disease: Evidence for Linkage on Chromosome 5q31 in Chinese Han Pedigrees

Ying Jin, Weiping Teng, Songtao Ben, Xiaoyan Xiong, Jing Zhang, Shijie Xu, Yin Yao Shugart, Li Jin, Jialun Chen and Wei Huang

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism (Y.J., W.T.), Department of Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital to China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, PR China; Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai (Y.J., S.B., X.X., J.Z., S.X., L.J., W.H.), Shanghai 201203, PR China; Department of Public Health (S.B.), China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, PR China; Rui-Jin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Second Medical University (J.C., W.H.), Shanghai 200025, PR China; and Department of Epidemiology (Y.Y.S.), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Weiping Teng, China Medical University, 92 North 2nd Road, Heping District, Shenyang 110001, PR China. E-mail: tengweiping{at}hotmail.com; or Dr. Wei Huang, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai, 250 Bi Bo Road, Shanghai 201203, PR China. E-mail: huangwei{at}chgc.sh.cn.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Graves’ disease (GD), which is a common organ-specific autoimmune disorder, is multifactorial and develops in genetically susceptible individuals. Despite many studies of candidate genes, only associations with human leukocyte antigen and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 have been generally detected, and the number of susceptibility genes remains unknown. To identify chromosomal regions contributing to GD, we conducted a genome-wide scan on 322 individuals from 54 Chinese Han multiplex GD pedigrees. Parametric linkage analysis revealed the strongest evidence for linkage at D5S436 on chromosome 5q31, with a maximum two-point LOD score of 2.8 and a maximum multipoint LOD score of 2.3. To further assess the significance of this suggestive finding, we typed four additional markers around D5S436 in this chromosome region, and a maximum two-point LOD score of 4.31 and a maximum multipoint LOD score of 4.12 were obtained for marker D5S2090 (with heterogeneity, = 0.38). Nonparametric multipoint analysis also showed significant excess allele sharing, with a P value as low as 0.001, at the same locus. Our findings provide evidence for a susceptibility locus for GD on chromosome 5q31 and support the existence of genetic heterogeneity in GD.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
GRAVES’ DISEASE (GD) is a common organ-specific autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of the thyroid gland and evidence of immune system activation with increased levels of circulating activated T lymphocytes and thyroid-specific autoantibodies. These antibodies, which are directed against the thyroid follicular cell membrane TSH receptor, stimulate thyroid function and cause the disease (1).

The etiology of GD is generally thought to fit a multifactorial pattern in which clinical disease phenotypes develop with the interplay of genetic susceptibility and environmental and endogenous factors (1, 2). Evidence for the role of genetic factors is indicated by an increased relative risk of more than 15 in siblings (3), compared with the general population ({lambda}s), and an increased concordance rate in monozygotic, compared with dizygotic, twins (4). The lack of a clear pattern of inheritance suggested that multiple genes are involved in influencing the autoimmune events in GD (5). During the last decade, many efforts have been put into the characterization of the genetic background of GD. Several candidate genes have been postulated and tested for a possible contribution to genetic susceptibility to GD by means of both association and linkage analysis. These have included the genes for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) (6, 7, 8, 9), T-cell receptor (10, 11), TSH receptor (12, 13), IL-1 receptor antagonist (14, 15), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) (16, 17). Interestingly, HLA (6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19, 20, 21) and CTLA-4 (16, 17, 22, 23) have been consistently associated with GD in different ethnic groups. However, linkages of GD with HLA and CTLA-4 need to be confirmed in additional studies (24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Other genes responsible for GD remain unknown.

Genome-wide linkage studies provide a powerful tool for disease gene identification. The availability of maps of markers that cover the entire human and mouse (and rat) genomes has enabled the chromosomal localization of almost 40 genes that contribute to autoimmunity in human disease and animal models (3). In one study, 14 multiplex GD pedigrees each with multiple affected individuals, 20 pedigrees that were mixed with both GD and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) first-degree relatives, and 22 multiplex pedigrees with HT were investigated. This cohort of pedigrees was derived from the North American, Italian, Israeli, and British populations. Three GD susceptibility loci were identified and located on chromosome 14, 20, and X (29). Another study was performed by Sakai et al. (28) using the nonparametric sibling-pair method in 123 Japanese sibling pairs with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD), including 67 GD sibling pairs, 25 HT sibling pairs, and 31 GD-HT sibling pairs, which demonstrated evidence for linkage of AITD to 5q31-q33. A maximum multipoint LOD score of 3.14 was obtained at D5S436.

In the current study, we performed a genome scan in a homogeneous cohort of 54 Chinese Han multiplex pedigrees with GD (322 individuals) to identify chromosomal regions that contribute to the genetic risk of GD. We hereby report the possible identification of a major susceptibility locus for GD on chromosome 5q31 in Chinese.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pedigrees

Fifty-four Chinese Han pedigrees (322 individuals) were analyzed in the study, all from Liaoning Province (located in the Northeast China). Among these pedigrees, 32 (59%) had two affected first-degree relatives, 15 (28%) had three, 5 (9%) had four, and 2 (4%) had five. Pedigrees were ascertained through a GD proband attending the Outpatient Department of Endocrine Diseases, who were subsequently confirmed having at least one first-degree relative with GD. The diagnosis of GD was based on documented clinical and biochemical evidence of hyperthyroidism, diffused goiter, and the presence of at least one of the following: positive TSH receptor antibody tests, diffusely increased 131I (iodine-131) uptake in the thyroid gland, or presence of exophthalmos. For this study, all other pedigree members, whether thyroid autoantibody positive or negative, were classified as unaffected. For diagnosis accuracy, all individuals classified as affected were interviewed and examined by experienced clinicians. After informed consent, blood samples were collected from all participants for DNA preparation as well as biochemical measurements. This project was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai for the involvement of human subjects.

Genotyping

Genomic DNAs were isolated from peripheral blood using standard procedures (30). A linkage mapping set (version 2.0, Perkin-Elmer PE Applied Biosystems) was used for genotyping. PCR was performed in 5 µl reaction volumes containing 20 ng genomic DNA; 0.05 µmol of each primer; 10 mmol/liter Tris-HCl (pH 8.3); 50 mmol/liter KCl; 3.0 mmol/liter MgCl2; 200 µmol/liter of each deoxy (d)-ATP, GTP, TTP, and CTP; and 0.25 U AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer PE Applied Biosystems). Reaction mixtures were heated to 94 C for 10 min and then cycled 44 times as follows: 30 sec at 94 C, 60 sec at 56 C, and 60 sec at 72 C, except that in the first 14 cycles, the annealing temperatures decreased from 63 C to 56 C by 0.5 C per cycle. A final extension of 10 min at 72 C was included. After PCR, 1 µl PCR products was mixed with 0.25 µl internal size standard, 1 µl double-distilled H2O, and 2.75 µl loading solution and then denatured and separated on a MegaBASE 1000 DNA sequencer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., Piscataway, NJ). Allele calling was performed by using Genetic Profiler 1.1 software (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.). Each genotype was reviewed manually by two members of the research team to confirm the accuracy of allele calling. Mendelian inheritance was confirmed using pedigree information.

Linkage analysis

Linkage analysis was performed by using both model-free (nonparametric) and model-based (parametric) approaches.

Parametric analysis

In the genetic analysis of common complex diseases, the LOD score methods have been shown to be more powerful than nonparametric methods (31, 32). We thus used the former as our major approach to test for linkage. Two-point and multipoint LOD scores were calculated by using the GENEHUNTER program (33) assuming both dominant and recessive models. For the dominant model, three levels of penetrance were tested (30%, 60%, and 90%); and for the recessive model, four levels of penetrance were evaluated (30%, 60%, 90%, and 100%). A population prevalence of 1% for GD was assumed (34, 35), with a nonsusceptibility genotype penetrance of 0.009; the gene frequency was adjusted according to the model (dominant or recessive) and the penetrance used, assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Marker allele frequencies were calculated from all available pedigree data. All LOD scores were calculated under the assumption of heterogeneity using an admixture test (36, 37) as implemented by GENEHUNTER (33).

Nonparametric analysis

Nonparametric linkage (NPL) scores were calculated for the complete marker set by using the multipoint algorithm in GENEHUNTER, version 2.0. As recommended by Kruglyak et al. (33), pedigrees were analyzed using the ALL function of GENEHUNTER, which examines all affected individuals simultaneously and assigns a higher score when more of them share the same allele by descent.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Characteristics of the study sample

Clinical characteristics of the 54 pedigrees studied are given in Table 1Go. Of the 139 affected individuals, 109 (78.4%) were females, with an affected female/male ratio of 3.6:1. This was consistent with that reported in the literature (38). Of the 183 unaffected subjects, 78 (42.6%) were positive for thyroid antibodies, which are similar to the incidence reported by Burek et al. (39). The female/male ratio in the thyroid antibody-positive, unaffected individuals was 1.5:1, which was in accordance with the finding by Tomer et al. (40).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study sample

 
Genome-wide scan revealed potential GD susceptibility loci

A total of 277 microsatellite markers were genotyped, with an average intermarker spacing of 13.4 cM and an average heterozygosity of 71%. We considered any region with a LOD greater than 1.0 or a P value less than 0.05 as potentially interesting. Parametric linkage analyses identified eight markers yielding LOD scores greater than 1.0. Of these, only the marker (D5S436) on chromosome 5q31 achieved a maximum LOD score above 2.0. The other markers were localized on chromosome 1p33, 1q42, 11p14, 12q15, and 15q21 (Table 2Go). Nonparametric linkage analyses also revealed eight loci showing nominal evidence for linkage (P < 0.05); the majority are the same as those found in parametric analyses, except the one (D10S185) on chromosome 10q23 and the one (D18S1102) on 18q12 (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Maximum two-point and multipoint LOD scores of potential GD susceptibility loci under the assumption of heterogeneity: results of genome-wide scan

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Nonparametric multipoint linkage analyses revealed loci showing a P value of less than 0.05: results of genome-wide scan

 
Both parametric (Table 2Go) and nonparametric linkage analyses (Table 3Go) revealed the strongest evidence for linkage at marker D5S436 on chromosome 5q31. To further assess the significance of these suggestive findings, we typed four additional markers around D5S436 in this chromosome region, and we obtained evidence in favor of linkage by both parametric and nonparametric analyses.

Two-point parametric linkage analysis

A maximum two-point LOD score of 4.31 ( = 0.52) was obtained for marker D5S2090 under the recessive model with complete penetrance. The LOD scores for other markers in the local region of D5S2090 were positive in a geographically logical sequence (Fig. 1Go). The two-point LOD scores obtained for D5S2090 under all inheritance models tested further demonstrate its major effect in our pedigrees; indeed, three of the recessive models (with a penetrance of 60%, 90%, or 100%) gave LOD scores greater than 3.0.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Maximum two-point LOD scores for markers on chromosome 5 under the assumption of heterogeneity. The highest LOD score occurred at marker D5S2090 (maximum LOD score, 4.31), and the LOD scores for other markers in the region were positive in a geographically logical sequence.

 
Multipoint parametric linkage analysis

For the multipoint analysis, we used a genetic map for chromosome 5, with sex-average distances between markers (in cM units) as follows: D5S1981 - 10.1 - D5S406 - 7.9 - D5S630 - 20.9 - D5S419 - 12.1 - D5S426 - 6.5 - D5S418 - 6.9 - D5S407 - 9.7 - D5S647 - 9.4 - D5S424 - 8.3 - D5S641 - 26.5 - D5S2027 - 10.7 - D5S471 - 9 - D5S2115 - 6.2 - D5S2017 - 2.4 - D5S436 - 2.7 - D5S2090 - 0.2 - D5S434 - 2.7 - D5S2014 - 4.0 - D5S410 - 7.1 - D5S422 - 10.9 - D5S400 - 21 - D5S408. This order and the cM units were obtained from the Genethon maps (41). Multipoint linkage analysis localized the GD susceptibility locus to within an approximate interval of 2 cM between markers D5S436 and D5S434. The multipoint LOD scores throughout this interval were more than 3.0, with a maximum multipoint LOD score of 4.12 ( = 0.38; Fig. 2Go). Examination of individual pedigrees showed that 30% of the pedigrees had positive (>+0.1) LOD scores for D5S2090, within the range of 0.1–2.0. No apparent clinical differences in patients were observed in the "linked" (>+0.1) and "unlinked" pedigrees (<-0.1).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Multipoint parametric linkage analysis for the region 5q31 under the assumption of heterogeneity. The multipoint analysis localized the GD susceptibility locus to within an approximate interval of 2 cM between markers D5S436 and D5S434. The multipoint LOD scores throughout this interval were more than 3.0, with a maximum multipoint LOD score of 4.12.

 
Multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis

Multipoint nonparametric linkage analyses were conducted by using the GENEHUNTER program. The peak NPL score occurred at marker D5S2090, the same marker that gave the highest parametric LOD score. The peak NPL score was 2.66 (P = 0.001), which supports the evidence for linkage at this locus (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Multipoint nonparametric linkage analysis of 22 markers on chromosome 5. The NPL score is shown against the marker map on the x-axis. The maximum evidence for linkage, an NPL score of 2.66 (P = 0.001), occurs at marker D5S2090.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our results suggest that chromosomal region 5q31 contains a locus that contributes to the genetic susceptibility to GD. These positive results are noteworthy because they were observed over a range of genetic models, both parametric and nonparametric approaches, and several marker loci in this region. The concordance of the candidate region with that found in Japanese pedigrees (28) further reduces the possibility of a false-positive linkage. Interestingly, the maximum LOD score was obtained for the recessive model, at a penetrance of 100%.

For a complex trait like GD, the multigenic nature and possible heterogeneity among different ethnic, geographic, and racial populations, in both genetic etiology of the disease and marker allele frequencies, make replication of linkages a great challenge. However, using the same marker set but different ascertainment strategies to recruit pedigrees (at least two affected first-degree relatives with GD for our study and at least two affected sibs with AITD for the study of Sakai et al.) and different statistical tests, our genome-wide scan in Chinese replicated the findings of Sakai et al. (28) in Japanese, which localized a susceptibility locus for GD to chromosome 5q31. Especially, results from both groups revealed the maximum LOD score at D5S436 (28). The sample size of this study was not very large, but we did replicate the linkage of GD to 5q31, suggesting that this region may harbor a gene of strong effect. Because we fine-mapped this region further and Sakai et al. (28) did not, we were able to localize the susceptibility locus for GD in this region more accurately, to within an approximate interval of 2 cM between markers D5S436 and D5S434.

Both Chinese and Japanese are Eastern-Asian populations, and it has been shown that Eastern-Asian populations are derived from the same ancient population (42). The fact that linkage of GD with chromosome 5q31 has not been reported in whites thus far suggests that the susceptibility locus for GD in this region may be Eastern-Asian population specific.

In the present study, we obtained a maximum two-point LOD score of 4.31 and a maximum multipoint LOD score of 4.12; both represented significant evidence for linkage (43, 44). The results from parametric tests of linkage are far more supportive of linkage than the nonparametric (NPL) results. This may be due at least in part to the inherently lower power of nonparametric approaches (31, 32).

Genetic heterogeneity, which means mutations in any one of several genes can result in the same phenotype, is a major confounding factor in the mapping of complex disease genes. The existence of genetic heterogeneity hampers genetic mapping because a chromosomal region may cosegregate with a disease in some pedigrees but not in others (45). To test genetic heterogeneity in our data set, the admixture test (36, 37), as implemented in the GENEHUNTER program (33), was employed. The results were significant. The maximum two-point and multipoint LOD scores obtained for marker D5S2090 under the assumption of heterogeneity were 4.31 and 4.12, respectively, significantly greater than the corresponding values without heterogeneity, -2.23 and -7.09, respectively. In addition, we also performed the heterogeneity test using HOMOG (46). We tested the hypothesis that there is linkage and heterogeneity (H2) against the hypothesis that there is neither linkage nor heterogeneity. And the estimated proportion of families linked to the locus of interest was 0.55. The {chi}2 value was 19.753 and the likelihood ratio that presents the exact odds for this test was 1.947 x 104. As pointed out by Terwilliger and Ott (37), "for considering the test of H2 vs. H0 to be significant, the likelihood ratio must exceed 2000." Thus, we concluded that our data support the existence of genetic heterogeneity in GD. In addition, we want to note that, by default, GENEHUNTER computes two-point HLOD at a recombination fraction of zero, and HOMOG uses all recombination fractions and computes the LOD scores at these recombination fractions. In the heterogeneity test we performed, {alpha} and {theta} were both estimated ( = 0.55; = 0.001, HLOD = 4.294). This may explain why the estimated {alpha} and HLOD given by two computer programs are slightly different.

Three of the potential GD susceptibility regions identified in this screen of GD pedigrees, 12q15, 1p33, and 18q12, have also been implicated in other human autoimmune diseases. Interval 12q15 includes potential susceptibility loci for Crohn’s disease (47) and multiple sclerosis (MS: 49). The 1p33 and 18q12 intervals showed evidence for linkage with MS (48, 49). The overlapping of the susceptibility loci for different autoimmune disorders supports the notion that there may be common genetic factors that predispose to autoimmunity (50). Vyse and Todd (3) have shown significant overlapping of susceptibility loci for autoimmune diseases in the mouse.

In conclusion, our first attempt of the whole genome screen in Chinese GD pedigrees demonstrated evidence for linkage of GD to chromosome 5q31 in a region that has also been linked to GD in Japanese, but not in whites, suggesting that this region may contain a major locus for GD specific for Eastern-Asian populations. The detection of multiple loci with lower significance levels and the evidence for the existence of genetic heterogeneity support the presumed complexity of the genetic etiology of GD. The characterization of susceptibility genes with effects large enough to be detectable in whole genome screens should provide new insights into the pathogenesis of GD and offer important opportunities for improving diagnostic methods, treatment, and perhaps even strategies to prevent this genetically complicated autoimmune disorder.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to all the patients and their pedigree members who participated in this study and the physicians who referred pedigrees and verified diagnoses.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by grants from the Chinese High-tech Program (863); National Natural Science Foundation Key Program (39993420, 39896200); National Key Program on Basic Research (G1998051002) from the Ministry of Science and Technology; National Natural Science Foundation of China (39970350); and Chinese Medical Board (98-688IITD), People’s Republic of China.

W.T. and W.H. contributed equally to this work.

Abbreviations: AITD, Autoimmune thyroid disease; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4; GD, Graves’ disease; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; LOD, limit of detection; NPL, nonparametric linkage.

Received December 12, 2001.

Accepted January 10, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Weetman AP, McGregor AM 1994 Autoimmune thyroid disease: further developments in our understanding. Endocr Rev 15:788–830[Abstract]
  2. DeGroot LJ, Quintans J 1989 The causes of autoimmune thyroid disease. Endocr Rev 10:537–562[Medline]
  3. Vyse TJ, Todd JA 1996 Genetic analysis of autoimmune disease. Cell 85:311–318[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Brix TH, Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Hegedus L 2001 Evidence for a major role of heredity in Graves’ disease: a population-based study two Danish twin cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:930–934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Farid NR 1992 Understanding the genetics of autoimmune thyroid disease—still an illusive goal! J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:495A–495B[CrossRef]
  6. Grumet FC, Payne RO, Konishi J, Mori T, Kriss JP 1975 HLA antigens in Japanese patients with Graves’ disease. Tissue Antigens 6:347–352[Medline]
  7. Tan Siok-Hoon, Chan Soh-Ha, Lee Bee-Wah, Wee Guan-Bock, Wong Hock-Boon 1988 HLA association in Singapore children with Grave’s disease. Metabolism 37:518–519[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Cavan DA, Penny MA, Jacobs KH, Kelly MA, Jenkins D, Mijovic C, Chow C, Cockram CS, Hawkins BR, Barnett AH 1994 The HLA association with Graves’ disease is sex-specific in Hong Kong Chinese subjects. Clin Endocrinol 40:63–66[Medline]
  9. Yanagawa T, Mangklabruks A, DeGroot LJ 1994 Strong association between HLA-DQA1*0501 and Graves’ disease in a male Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:227–229[Abstract]
  10. Pickerill AP, Watson PF, Tandon N, Weetman AP 1993 T cell receptor beta chain gene polymorphisms in Graves’ disease. Acta Endocrinol 128:499–502
  11. Lee BW, Tan J, Yap HK, Wong SC, Poh KS, Lee KO 1995 Restriction fragment length polymorphism of the T cell receptor beta-chain gene in Chinese patients with thyrotoxic hypokaleamic periodic paralysis and Graves’ disease. Autoimmunity 21:241–244[Medline]
  12. Kotsa KD, Watson PF, Weetman AP 1997 No association between a thyrotropin receptor gene polymorphism and Graves’ disease in the female population. Thyroid 7:31–33[Medline]
  13. Allahabadia A, Heward JM, Mijovic C, Carr-Smith J, Daykin J, Cockram C, Barnett AH, Sheppard MC, Franklyn JA, Gough SC 1998 Lack of association between polymorphism of the thyrotropin receptor gene and Graves’ disease in United Kingdom and Hong Kong Chinese patients: case control and family-based studies. Thyroid 8:777–780[Medline]
  14. Blakemore AI, Watson PF, Weetman AP, Duff GW 1995 Association of Graves’ disease with an allele of the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:111–115[Abstract]
  15. Cuddihy RM, Bahn RS 1996 Lack of an association between alleles of interleukin-1{alpha} and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist genes and Graves’ disease in a North American Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:4476–4478[Abstract]
  16. Yanagawa T, Hidaka Y, Guimaraes V, Soliman M, DeGroot LJ 1995 CTLA-4 gene polymorphism associated with Graves’ disease in a Caucasian population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:41–45[Abstract]
  17. Yanagawa T, Taniyama M, Enomoto S, Gomi K, Maruyama H, Ban Y, Saruta T 1997 CTLA4 gene polymorphism confers susceptibility to Graves’ disease in Japanese. Thyroid 7:843–846[Medline]
  18. Dong RP, Kimura A, Okubo R, Shinagawa H, Tamai H, Nishimura Y, Sasazuki T 1992 HLA-A and DPB1 loci confer susceptibility to Graves’ disease. Hum Immunol 35:165–172[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Badenhoop K, Walfish PG, Rau H, Fischer S, Nicolay A, Bogner U, Schleusener H, Usadel KH 1995 Susceptibility and resistance alleles of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQA1 and HLA DQB1 are shared in endocrine autoimmune disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2112–2117[Abstract]
  20. Heward JM, Allahabadia A, Daykin J, Carr-Smith J, Daly A, Armitage M, Dodson PM, Sheppard MC, Barnett AH, Franklyn JA, Gough SC 1998 Linkage disequilibrium between the human leukocyte antigen class II region of the major histocompatibility complex and Graves’ disease: replication using a population case control and family-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:3394–3397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wong GW, Cheng SH, Dorman JS 1999 The HLA-DQ associations with Graves’ disease in Chinese children. Clin Endocrinol 50:493–495[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Heward JM, Allahabadia A, Armitage M, Hattersley A, Dodson PM, Macleod K, Carr-Smith J, Daykin J, Daly A, Sheppard MC, Holder RL, Barnett AH, Franklyn JA, Gough SC 1999 The development of Graves’ disease and the CTLA-4 gene on chromosome 2q33. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2398–2401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kouki T, Sawai Y, Gardine CA, Fisfalen ME, Alegre ML, DeGroot LJ 2000 CTLA-4 gene polymorphism at position 49 in exon 1 reduces the inhibitory function of CTLA-4 and contributes to the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease. J Immunol 165:6606–6611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hawkins BR, Ma JT, Lam KS, Wang CC, Yeung RT 1985 Analysis of linkage between HLA haplotype and susceptibility to Graves’ disease in multiple-case Chinese families in Hong Kong. Acta Endocrinol 110:66–69
  25. Roman SH, Greenberg D, Rubinstein P, Wallenstein S, Davies TF 1992 Genetics of autoimmune thyroid disease: lack of evidence for linkage to HLA within families. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:496–503[Abstract]
  26. Barbesino G, Tomer Y, Concepcion E, Davies TF, Greenberg DA 1998 Linkage analysis of candidate genes in autoimmune thyroid disease: 1. Selected immunoregulatory genes. International Consortium for the Genetics of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1580–1584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Vaidya B, Imrie H, Perros P, Young ET, Kelly WF, Carr D, Large DM, Toft AD, McCarthy MI, Kendall-Taylor P, Pearce SH 1999 The cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 is a major Graves’ disease locus. Hum Mol Genet 8:1195–1199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sakai K, Shirasawa S, Ishikawa N, Ito K, Tamai H, Kuma K, Akamizu T, Tanimura M, Furugaki K, Yamamoto K, Sasazuki T 2001 Identification of susceptibility loci for autoimmune thyroid disease to 5q31-q33 and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis to 8q23-q24 by multipoint affected sib-pair linkage analysis in Japanese. Hum Mol Genet 13:1379–1386
  29. Tomer Y, Barbesino G, Greenberg DA, Concepcion E, Davies TF 1999 Mapping the major susceptibility loci for familial Graves’ and Hashimoto’s diseases: evidence for genetic heterogeneity and gene interactions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4656–4664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T 1989 Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, ed 2
  31. Durner M, Vieland VJ, Greenberg DA 1999 Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods. Am J Hum Genet 64:281–289[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Abreu PC, Greenberg DA, Hodge SE 1999 Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases. Am J Hum Genet 65:847–857[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander ES 1996 Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet 58:1347–1363[Medline]
  34. Tunbridge WM, Evered DC, Hall R, Appleton D, Brewis M, Clark F, Evans JG, Young E, Bird T, Smith PA 1977 The spectrum of thyroid disease in a community: the Whickham survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 7:481–493[Medline]
  35. Vanderpump MP, Tunbridge WM, French JM, Appleton D, Bates D, Clark F, Grimley Evans J, Hasan DM, Rodgers H, Tunbridge F, Young ET 1995 The incidence of thyroid disorders in the community: a twenty-year follow-up of the Whickham survey. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 43:55–68[Medline]
  36. Ott J 1991 Analysis of human genetic linkage, revised edition. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press
  37. Terwilliger JD, Ott J 1994 Handbook of human genetic linkage. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
  38. Lungu G, Zosin I, Milos A, Vasiu F, Ciupagea A 1988 Epidemiological aspects of Graves’-Basedow’s disease. Endocrinologie 26:107–111[Medline]
  39. Burek CL, Hoffman WH, Rose NR 1982 The presence of thyroid autoantibodies in children and adolescents with autoimmune thyroid disease and in their siblings and parents. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 25:395–404[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Tomer Y, Barbesino G, Greenberg DA, Concepcion ES, Davies TF 1998 A new Graves disease-susceptibility locus maps to chromosome 20q11.2. Am J Hum Genet 63:1749–1756[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Dib C, Faure S, Fizames C, Samson D, Drouot N, Vignal A, Millasseau P, Marc S, Hazan J, Seboun E, Lathrop M, Gyapay G, Morissette J, Weissenbach J 1996 A comprehensive genetic map of the human genome based on 5, 264 microsatellites. Nature 380:152–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Su B, Xiao J, Underhill P, Deka R, Zhang W, Akey J, Huang W, Shen D, Lu D, Luo J, Chu J, Tan J, Shen P, Davis R, Cavalli-Sforza L, Chakraborty R, Xiong M, Du R, Oefner P, Chen Z, Jin L 1999 Y-chromosome evidence for a northward migration of modern humans into eastern Asia during the last Ice Age. Am J Hum Genet 65:1718–1724[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Lander E, Kruglyak L 1995 Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet 11:241–247[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Thomson G 1994 Identifying complex disease genes: progress and paradigms. Nat Genet 8:108–110[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Lander ES, Schork NJ 1994 Genetic dissection of complex traits. Science 265:2037–2048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Ott J1986 Linkage probability and its approximate confidence interval under possible heterogeneity. Genet Epidemiol 1(Suppl):251–257
  47. Satsangi J, Parkes M, Louis E, Hashimoto L, Kato N, Welsh K, Terwilliger JD, Lathrop GM, Bell JI, Jewell DP 1996 Two stage genome-wide search in inflammatory bowel disease provides evidence for susceptibility loci on chromosomes 3, 7 and 12. Nat Genet 14:199–202[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Haines JL, Ter-Minassian M, Bazyk A, Gusella JF, Kim DJ, Terwedow H, Pericak-Vance MA, Rimmler JB, Haynes CS, Roses AD, Lee A, Shaner B, Menold M, Seboun E, Fitoussi RP, Gartioux C, Reyes C, Ribierre F, Gyapay G, Weissenbach J, Hauser SL, Goodkin DE, Lincoln R, Usuku K, Oksenberg JR 1996 A complete genomic screen for multiple sclerosis underscores a role for the major histocompatability complex. The Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Group. Nat Genet 13:469–471[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Sawcer S, Jones HB, Feakes R, Gray J, Smaldon N, Chataway J, Robertson N, Clayton D, Goodfellow PN, Compston A 1996 A genome screen in multiple sclerosis reveals susceptibility loci on chromosome 6p21 and 17q22. Nat Genet 13:464–468[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Becker KG, Simon RM, Bailey-Wilson JE, Freidlin B, Biddison WE, McFarland HF, Trent JM 1998 Clustering of non-major histocompatibility complex susceptibility candidate loci in human autoimmune diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:9979–9984[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
C. J Owen, J. A Eden, C. E Jennings, V. Wilson, T. D Cheetham, and S. H S Pearce
Genetic association studies of the FOXP3 gene in Graves' disease and autoimmune Addison's disease in the United Kingdom population.
J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2006; 37(1): 97 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. C. Taylor, S. C. Gough, P. J. Hunt, T. H. Brix, K. Chatterjee, J. M. Connell, J. A. Franklyn, L. Hegedus, B. G. Robinson, W. M. Wiersinga, et al.
A Genome-Wide Screen in 1119 Relative Pairs with Autoimmune Thyroid Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 646 - 653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. Hiromatsu, T. Fukutani, M. Ichimura, T. Mukai, H. Kaku, H. Nakayama, I. Miyake, S. Shoji, Y. Koda, and T. Bednarczuk
Interleukin-13 Gene Polymorphisms Confer the Susceptibility of Japanese Populations to Graves' Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 296 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. Bayer, S. Neumann, B. Meyer, F. Ruschendorf, A. Reske, T. Brix, L. Hegedus, P. Langer, P. Nurnberg, and R. Paschke
Genome-Wide Linkage Analysis Reveals Evidence for Four New Susceptibility Loci for Familial Euthyroid Goiter
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2004; 89(8): 4044 - 4052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jin, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Huang, W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals