help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopprasch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Graessler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopprasch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Graessler, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
Hazardous Substances DB
*PARAOXON
*PHENYLACETIC ACID
*SODIUM PHENYLACETATE
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 4 1711-1716
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Lack of Association between Serum Paraoxonase 1 Activities and Increased Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Levels in Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus

Steffi Kopprasch, Jens Pietzsch, Eberhard Kuhlisch and Juergen Graessler

Department of Internal Medicine 3 (S.K., J.G.) and Institute of Medical Informatics and Biometry (E.K.), Carl Gustav Carus Medical School, University of Technology Dresden, Dresden D-01307; and Institute of Bioinorganic and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry (J.P.), Research Centre Rossendorf, Dresden D-01314, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Steffi Kopprasch, University of Technology Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Medical School, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Pathological Biochemistry, Fetscherstrasse 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany. E-mail: Steffi.Kopprasch{at}mailbox.tu-dresden.de.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Several in vitro investigations showed that serum paraoxonase 1 (PON1) that is located on high-density lipoprotein reduces or prevents low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation and therefore retards atherosclerosis. Accordingly, the well documented loss of PON1 activity in patients with overt diabetes mellitus was causally related to the development of micro- and macroangiopathy in the disease course. Because vascular complications start already in prediabetic states, e.g. impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), we investigated serum PON1 activities and circulating levels of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) in 125 IGT subjects, 75 patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus type 2, and 403 individuals with normal glucose tolerance. Using three different substrates (paraoxon, phenylacetate, p-nitrophenylacetate) we found that PON1 activity is not significantly altered in IGT and diabetes mellitus subjects, respectively, when compared with normoglycemic controls. Both IGT subjects and diabetes mellitus patients had significantly increased levels of oxLDL in the circulation. However, serum PON1 activity variations and glutamine/arginine phenotype were not related to the levels of oxLDL. The data suggest that 1) PON1 activity loss is an event occurring later in the course of diabetes mellitus; and 2) PON1 does not affect oxidation of circulating LDL, at least in early diabetes mellitus.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SEVERAL MECHANISMS HAVE been proposed for the explanation of the antiatherogenic properties of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Among them, paraoxonase (PON1) has raised special interest. PON1 is a calciumdependent esterase that is exclusively bound to the apolipoprotein A1-containing HDL fraction in serum. In vitro studies showed that PON1 prevents accumulation of lipoperoxides in low-density lipoproteins (LDL; Ref. 1). Moreover, HDL-associated PON1 is able to destroy oxidized phospholipids in modified LDLs, therefore reversing the proinflammatory actions of LDL (2). Oxidized LDL (oxLDL) has been shown to be a causal pathogenetic factor in the development of atherosclerosis (3). Vascular complications start already in prediabetic states, e.g. impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; Ref4) and accelerated atherosclerosis has been documented in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM). Accordingly, we could demonstrate increased levels of circulating oxLDL in IGT subjects very recently (5).

Decreased levels of PON1 activity have been found in patients with overt DM in several studies (6, 7, 8), and they have been causally related to diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications. The PON1 status in an early disease state has not been evaluated yet. The aim of the present study was to determine serum PON1 activities in IGT subjects and patients with newly diagnosed DM and to relate them to levels of circulating oxLDL.

The PON1 gene polymorphisms at position 55 (methionine/leucine) and at position 192 (glutamine/arginine, Q/R) have been inconsistently associated with vascular disease. Several studies showed a positive association between the PON1 R allele and the risk of coronary heart disease. In the present study, we investigated whether the PON1 Q/R phenotype predicted the level of oxLDL.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

The study comprised 603 Caucasian subjects who were attending the RIAD (Risk Factors in Impaired Glucose Tolerance for Atherosclerosis and Diabetes) study. In brief, middle-aged subjects (40–70 yr) who were at risk for development of diabetes owing to a family history of DM, obesity, and/or hyper/dyslipoproteinemia were examined. Clinically overt diabetes and medication affecting glucose tolerance were exclusion criteria. The study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines proposed in the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects consented to participate in the study, which was approved by the local Ethics Committee.

The diagnosis of IGT and DM was confirmed by an oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT; 75 g oral glucose challenge) according to World Health Organization guidelines and criteria (9): 2 h post-challenge plasma glucose concentration between 7.8–11.1 mmol/liter for IGT, and more than 11.1 mmol/liter for DM. According to oGTT criteria, individuals were grouped into subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 403), subjects with IGT (n = 125), and patients with newly diagnosed DM (n = 75). Several follow-up studies documented that persons with IGT are at higher risk to develop DM than NGT subjects (10, 11). Moreover, therapies including change in lifestyle aimed to improve glucose tolerance in subjects with IGT were able to reduce the incidence of DM (12). Therefore, IGT subjects in the present study are described as a prediabetic group, independently of the fact that not all of these IGT subjects consequently will develop overt DM. Subjects included into the DM group were diagnosed by their first pathological oGTT. Notably, they had no clinical symptoms of diabetes mellitus.

Baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study groups are given in Table 1Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic profile and basic clinical and laboratory parameters of the study population

 
Basic laboratory parameters

Blood samples were centrifuged within 20 min at 4 C. Serum, citrate, and EDTA plasma was separated from cells immediately after centrifugation and stored at -80 C until analyzed.

Plasma glucose was measured by the hexokinase method (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and HbA1c by HPLC on a Diamat analyzer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Plasma triglycerides, total cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol were measured as previously described (13). LDL cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. For determination of insulin and C-peptide aliquots were shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in cryovials at -80 C. Plasma insulin was assayed by specific enzyme immunoassay (Biosource Technologies Europe, Brussels, Belgium; within-day precision less than 3.8%, between-day precision less than 6.5%; no cross-reaction with human proinsulin and insulin, respectively). C-peptide was measured by specific enzyme immunoassay (Biosource Technologies Europe; within-day precision less than 3.5%, between-day precision less than 6.0%; no cross-reaction with human proinsulin and insulin).

oxLDL

Serum levels of total oxLDL particles were directly measured by a sandwich ELISA assay (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden; within-day precision less than 3.5%, between-day precision less than 6.5%) based on monoclonal antibody mAB-4E6 used by Holvoet et al. (14).

Paraoxonase activity and phenotyping

Serum PON1 activity was measured spectrophotometrically using three synthetic substrates: paraoxon, phenylacetate, and 4-nitrophenylacetate essentially as described by Dantoine (15). PON1 activities are expressed as µkat/liter. To determine individual phenotypes, the dual substrate method was applied (16). The ratio of the activity with paraoxon to the activity with phenylacetate was used to assign individuals to one of the three possible phenotypes QQ, QR, and RR. The phenotyping of PON1 by the dual substrate predicts the genotype of the enzyme with high accuracy (17).

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as means ± SD or means ± SEM. Phenotype distribution and gene frequency were analyzed by {chi}2 test. The means of the three groups NGT, IGT, and DM were compared by one-way ANOVA. The confounding effect of HDL on PON activities was assessed by ANOVA with HDL as covariate. ANOVA was coupled with a post hoc Bonferroni correction analysis when appropriate. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients ({rho}) were used to express relation between PON activities and oxLDL levels. The effect of the R-carriers and study groups on oxLDL levels was evaluated by univariate variance analysis.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The demographic details and basic laboratory parameters of the study population are given in Table 1Go. Considering the age of the NGT group (57 ± 8 yr), these subjects were normoglycemic, normolipidemic, and only mildly obese. As compared with NGT individuals, IGT subjects and patients with newly diagnosed DM were significantly older, had a higher systolic blood pressure, and were significantly more obese. IGT and DM subjects had significant higher levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, insulin, C-peptide, and HOMA (homeostasis model assessment) indices. The HOMA index is an accepted marker for individual insulin resistance and was calculated by the formula: fasting plasma glucose (millimoles/liter) x fasting plasma insulin (picomoles/liter)/154.8. HDL cholesterol levels were lower in IGT subjects and significantly decreased in the DM group. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol did not differ significantly between the groups.

Table 2Go shows the PON1 activities and phenotype distribution in the three groups. Because the physiological substrate of PON1 in humans is not known yet, it may be not accurate to estimate PON1 activity using exclusively paraoxon as substrate. Therefore, we determined serum PON1 activity using three different model substrates. The results show that PON1 activity was not different in NGT, IGT, and newly diagnosed DM subjects using either paraoxon, phenylacetate, or p-nitrophenylacetate as substrate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. PON activities and phenotype distribution in NGT, IGT, and newly diagnosed DM type 2

 
The ratio of the PON1 paraoxon to phenylacetate activity was used to phenotype the enzyme. In Fig. 1Go the individual activities toward paraoxon and phenylacetate are presented. The plot shows three groups of individuals corresponding to the three paraoxonase phenotypes QQ, QR, and RR.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Individual PON1 activities determining the phenotype of PON1 192 polymorphism. All of the 603 individuals tested are presented. PON1 activities are given as µkat/liter. {blacktriangleup}, RR phenotype; {square}, QR phenotype; {blacksquare}, QQ phenotype.

 
The QQ (192 Gln/Gln) phenotype was the most common in NGT and IGT subjects, followed by the QR (192 Gln/Arg) and the rare RR (192 Arg/Arg) phenotype (Table 2Go). In DM patients, the heterozygous QR phenotype dominated with 58.7%. There was no significant difference in the phenotype distribution between the groups. The allele frequency differed between the NGT and DM group being Q = 0.75, R = 0.25 in NGT and Q = 0.68 and R = 0.32 in DM. However, the differences were not statistically significant ({chi}2 test: 3.24, P = 0.198) The gene frequency data of NGT and DM subjects in the present study obtained by phenotyping of the enzyme were in excellent accordance with results of PON1 genotyping in a control and DM group of Caucasians in a study by Mackness et al. (7).

In Fig. 2Go variations in PON1 activities between NGT, IGT, and DM subjects stratified by individual PON1 192 phenotype are illustrated. As assessed by Bonferroni-adjusted P values, no significant differences between NGT, IGT, and DM subjects within one phenotype were found.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Serum PON1 activities in NGT, IGT, and DM subjects stratified by Q/R polymorphism. Data as means ± SEM. Enzyme activities are given as µkat/liter.

 
As compared with NGT, both IGT and DM subjects had significantly higher levels of circulating oxLDL (Table 3Go). No correlations could be found between serum PON1 activities and circulating levels of oxLDL in either study group (see Table 3Go). There was no tendency of carriers of the R allele in either group to have increased levels of oxLDL. As estimated by ANOVA, no specific effect of the R allele on oxLDL levels in all study groups could be found.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Serum levels of oxidized LDL and correlation coefficients between PON activities and oxLDL in NGT, IGT, and DM subjects

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study confirms our previous finding of increased levels of circulating oxLDL in IGT subjects (5), and extends it by the demonstration of significantly elevated oxLDL levels in newly diagnosed DM patients. The oxidation of LDL results from increased oxidative stress and the enzyme PON1 has been suggested to constitute an essential part in the systemic defense against oxidative burden of lipoproteins. Subsequently, decreased circulating levels of PON1 should increase oxidative modification of lipoproteins. Indeed, previous studies reported that PON1 activities are lower in DM (6, 7, 18, 19) and even more decreased in patients with diabetic neuropathy (6, 19), nephropathy (8), and retinopathy (8, 19). Considering the proposed antiatherogenic role of paraoxonase, it was followed that PON activity decrease could promote micro- and macroangiopathy in diabetes mellitus.

In the present study, PON1 activities were measured exactly as described by Dantoine et al. (15). Dantoine measured PON1 activities in 185 apparently healthy subjects. Their data are in very good accordance with our not HDL-adjusted results in NGT subjects (paraoxon: 3.67 ± 2.83 µkat/liter/Dantoine vs. 4.67 ± 3.83 µkat/liter/present study; phenylacetate: 1667 ± 550 µkat/liter vs. 1650 ± 467 µkat/liter; p-nitrophenyl-acetate: 31.7 ± 15.0 µkat/liter vs. 46.7 ± 13.3 µkat/liter). As a result of this comparison, it is unlikely that in the present study PON1 activities were already diminished in the high risk NGT group. From the assessment of PON1 activities in the present investigation, two major results were obtained: 1) serum PON1 activity is not altered in IGT and early DM when compared with NGT; and 2) serum PON1 activity variations and phenotype are not correlated with the levels of oxLDL in the circulation. From similar PON1 activities in NGT, IGT, and newly diagnosed DM, we conclude that PON1 activity loss is not an early event, but develops in later states of diabetes mellitus.

Several DM-associated explanations of changes of PON1 activity are possible. First, conformational changes of the enzyme as a result of glycoxidation and/or lipoxidation processes (20) could alter its activity. As indication, in vitro glycation of purified paraoxonase protein by incubation in 25 mmol/liter glucose for 1 wk can cause a 40% reduction in enzymatic activity (21).

Second, changes in physicochemical properties of the HDL particle or in HDL metabolism could influence PON1 activity (22). Recently, Deakin et al. (23) found that size reduction and accumulation of unesterified cholesterol in the HDL particle may impair the capacity of HDL to facilitate PON1 release from cells and to stabilize the enzyme. In IGT and DM, composition of HDL is substantially altered (24, 25). This is followed by conformational changes in HDL particles that dramatically favors their catabolism (24, 25). There is evidence that alterations in HDL composition change binding properties of apolipoprotein A-I to the lipoprotein particle (25). It can be speculated that conformationally altered HDL also influences both binding of PON1 as well as PON1 metabolism.

Third, hormone and glucose homeostasis could affect PON1 activities. In a nondiabetic Japanese population, a positive association between HOMA index, an surrogate marker of insulin resistance, and paraoxonase activity has been found (26). Furthermore, short-term decreases of PON1 activity occur during acute hyperglycemia. In a previous study, we could show that during an oGTT PON1 activity significantly declines by 10–5% in both NGT and DM subjects (27).

Several studies reported a positive association between the PON1 gene polymorphism at codon 192 and the risk of coronary heart disease. A meta-analysis of 18 case-control studies investigating subjects with different diseases revealed a statistically significant overall association between the PON1-192R allele and the presence of coronary heart disease (28). This association was confirmed in several studies with DM patients (29, 30, 31, 32). In contrast, Cao et al. (33) did not found an association between carotid intima-media thickness as a surrogate parameter of macroangiopathy and PON1-192 gene polymorphism. In the present study, DM patients had a higher R allele frequency as compared with IGT and NGT subjects. However, the difference was not statistically significant.

The functional characteristics of the R allozyme that could be responsible for more frequent vascular disease are far from being fully understood. Regarding this, the main hypothesis is based on in vitro investigations showing that the R allele is less effective in protecting LDL against oxidative modification than the Q allele (34, 35). These investigations were performed by oxidizing LDL with copper. However, copper ions are very unlikely physiological candidates for LDL oxidation in vivo (36). Moreover, Aviram et al. (35) showed in his experiments that the effects of PON Q and PON R in preventing copper-induced LDL oxidation strongly depended on the experimental setup. If, for example, the enzymes were added simultaneously to LDL and the oxidant, PON Q had a greater protective effect than PON R. The opposite effect was observed when the allozymes were added 1.5 h after the initiation of LDL oxidation. In this case, PON R was more protective than PON Q. The authors concluded from their study that PON R and PON Q might contribute in different ways, even synergistically, to reduce LDL oxidation.

In the present investigation, IGT and DM subjects had significantly higher levels of oxLDL than NGT subjects. However, the levels of oxLDL did not correlate with serum PON1 activities. Moreover, there was no tendency of R carriers to have increased levels of circulating oxLDL. In this respect, several points could be discussed. First, PON1 is not the only antioxidant in HDL and, moreover, in the blood. Other components may have a greater impact in preventing LDL oxidation or destroying specific oxidized lipoprotein constituents in the circulation. Second, the onset of vascular complications in early states of diabetes mellitus may not necessarily be caused by a decrease in circulating PON1 activity. Third, a decrease in PON1 activity in overt diabetes mellitus may not be causally related to late diabetic complications. It develops as a result of disease-associated metabolic and hormonal changes in the circulation without effect on the integrity of lipoproteins in vivo.

In conclusion, our study does not support a causal relationship between circulating PON1 activities and oxidative modification of circulating LDL in IGT and newly diag-nosed DM.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Martina Kohl and the lipoprotein laboratory (Lab 6c/10a) of the Institute of Clinical Metabolic Research, Carl Gustav Carus Medical School, University of Technology Dresden, for the excellent technical support.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by Grant 01ZZ9604 from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany.

Abbreviations: DM, Diabetes mellitus type 2; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; oxLDL, oxidized LDL; oGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PON1, paraoxonase 1; Q/R, glutamine/arginine.

Received October 7, 2002.

Accepted January 3, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Mackness MI, Arrol S, Durrington PN 1991 Paraoxonase prevents accumulation of lipoperoxides in low-density lipoprotein. FEBS Lett 286:152–154[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Watson AD, Berliner JA, Hama SY, La Du BN, Faull KF, Fogelman AM, Navab M 1995 Protective effect of high density lipoprotein associated paraoxonase. Inhibition of the biological activity of minimally oxidized low density lipoprotein. J Clin Invest 96:2882–2891
  3. Steinberg D 1997 Low density lipoprotein oxidation and its pathobiological significance. J Biol Chem 272:20963–20966[Free Full Text]
  4. Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Henkel E, Fuecker K, Schaper F, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T 2000 Post-challenge hyperglycaemia relates more strongly than fasting hyperglycaemia with carotid intima-media thickness: the RIAD study. Diabetic Med 17:835–840[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Kopprasch S, Pietzsch J, Kuhlisch E, Fuecker K, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T, Hanefeld M, Kühne H, Julius U, Graessler J 2002 In vivo evidence for increased oxidation of circulating LDL in impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 51:3102–3106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Abbott CA, Mackness MI, Kumar S, Boulton AJ, Durrington PN 1995 Serum paraoxonase activity, concentration, and phenotype distribution in diabetes mellitus and its relationship to serum lipids and lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 15:1812–1818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mackness B, Mackness MI, Arrol S, Turkie W, Julier K, Abuasha B, Miller JE, Boulton AJM, Durrington PN 1998 Serum paraoxonase (PON1) 55 and 192 polymorphism and paraoxonase activity and concentration in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 139:341–349[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ikeda Y, Suehiro T, Inoue M, Nakauchi Y, Morita T, Arii K, Ito H, Kumon Y, Hashimoto K 1998 Serum paraoxonase activity and its relationship to diabetic complications in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 47:598–602[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. 1999 The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 22(Suppl 1):S5–S19
  10. Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, Wang JX, Yang WY, An ZX, Hu ZX, Bennett PH, Howard BV 1997 Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 20:537–544[Abstract]
  11. de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Jager A, Hienkens E, Kostense PJ, Stehouwer CD, Nijpels G, Bouter LM, Heine RJ 2001 Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population: the Hoorn Study. JAMA 285:2109–2113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinanen-Kiumkaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M, Finnish Prevention Study Group 2001 Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 344:1334–1350
  13. Pietzsch J, Subat S, Nitzsche S, Leonhardt W, Schentke KU, Hanefeld M 1995 Very fast ultracentrifugation of serum lipoproteins influence on lipoprotein separation and composition. Biochim Biophys Acta 1254:77–88[Medline]
  14. Holvoet P, Vanhaecke J, Janssens S, Van de Werf F, Collen D 1998 Oxidized LDL and malondialdehyde-modified LDL in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. Circulation 98:1487–1494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Dantoine TF, Debord J, Charmes JP, Merle L, Marquet P, Lachatre G, Leroux-Robert C 1998 Decrease of serum paraoxonase activity in chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 9:2082–2088[Abstract]
  16. Eckerson HW, Wyte CM, La Du BN 1983 The human serum paraoxonase/arylesterase polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 35:1126–1138[Medline]
  17. Jarvik GP, Rozek LS, Brophy VH, Hatsukami TS, Richter RJ, Schellenberg GD, Furlong CE 2000 Paraoxonase (PON1) phenotype is a better predictor of vascular disease than is PON1192 or PON155 genotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20:2441–2447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sakai T, Matsuura B, Onji M 1998 Serum paraoxonase activity and genotype distribution in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus. Intern Med 37:581–584[Medline]
  19. Mackness B, Durrington PN, Abuashia B, Boulton AJ, Mackness MI 2000 Low paraoxonase activity in type II diabetes mellitus complicated by retinopathy. Clin Sci 98:355–363[Medline]
  20. Baynes JW, Thorpe SR 2000 Glycoxidation and lipoxidation in atherogenesis. Free Rad Biol Med 28:1708–1716[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hedrick CC, Thorpe SR, Fu MX, Harper CM, Yoo J, Kim SM, Wong H, Peters AL 2000 Glycation impairs high-density lipoprotein function. Diabetologia 43:312–320[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Ferretti G, Bacchetti T, Marchionni C, Caldarelli L, Curatola G 2001 Effect of glycation of high density lipoproteins on their physicochemical properties and on paraoxonase activity. Acta Diabetol 38:163–169[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Deakin S, Leviev I, Gomaraschi M, Calabresi L, Franceschini G, James RW 2002 Enzymatically active paraoxonase-1 is located at the external membrane of producing cells and released by a high affinity, saturable, desorption mechanism. J Biol Chem 277:4301–4308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Pietzsch J, Julius U, Nitzsche S, Hanefeld M 1998 In vivo evidence for increased apolipoprotein A-I catabolism in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes 47:1928–1934[Abstract]
  25. Rashid S, Uffelman KD, Lewis GF 2002 The mechanism of HDL lowering in hypertriglyceridemic, insulin-resistant states. J Diabetes Compl 16:24–28[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Yamada A, Shoji T, Tahara H, Emoto M, Nishizawa Y 2001 Effect of insulin resistance on serum paraoxonase activity in a nondiabetic population. Metabolism 50:805–811[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Kopprasch S, Pietzsch J, Kuhlisch E, Graessler J, Chemiluminescence as a tool to assess hyperglycemia-induced systemic oxidative stress in different insulin-resistant states. Abstracts of the 12th International Symposium on Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence, Cambridge, 2002. Luminescence 17:94 (Abstract)
  28. Durrington PN, Mackness B, Mackness MI 2001 Paraoxonase and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21:473–480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Aubo C, Senti M, Marrugat J, Tomas M, Vila J, Sala J, Masia R 2000 Risk of myocardial infarction associated with Gln/Arg 192 polymorphism in the human paraoxonase gene and diabetes mellitus. Eur Heart J 21:33–38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pfohl M, Koch M, Enderle MD, Kuhn R, Fullhase J, Karsch KR, Haring HU 1999 Paraoxonase 192 Gln/Arg gene polymorphism, coronary artery disease, and myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 48:623–627[Abstract]
  31. Ruiz J, Blanche H, James RW, Garin MCB, Vaisse C, Charpentier G, Cohen N, Morabia A, Passa P, Froguel P 1995 Gln-Arg 192 polymorphism of paraoxonase and coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 346:869–872[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Osei-Hyiaman D, Hou L, Mengbai F, Zhiyin R, Zhiming Z, Kano K 2001 Coronary artery disease risk in Chinese type 2 diabetics: is there a role for paraoxonase 1 gene (Q192R) polymorphism? Eur J Endocrinol 144:639–644[Abstract]
  33. Cao H, Girard-Globa A, Serusclat A, Bernard S, Bondon P, Picard S, Berthezene F, Moulin P 1998 Lack of association between carotid intima-media thickness and paraoxonase gene polymorphism in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 138:361–366[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Mackness B, Mackness MI, Arrol S, Turkie W, Durrington PN 1998 Effect of the human serum paraoxonase 55 and 192 genetic polymorphisms on the protection by high density lipoprotein against low density lipoprotein oxidative modification. FEBS Lett 423:57–60[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Aviram M, Billecke S, Sorenson R, Bisgaier C, Newton R, Rosenblat M, Erogul J, Hsu C, Dunlop C, La Du B 1998 Paraoxonase active site required for protection against LDL oxidation involves its free sulfhydryl group and is different from that required for its arylesterase/paraoxonase activities. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 18:1617–1624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Stocker R 1994 Lipoprotein oxidation: mechanistic aspects, methodological approaches and clinical relevance. Curr Opin Lipidol 5:422–433[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopprasch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Graessler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopprasch, S.
Right arrow Articles by Graessler, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
Hazardous Substances DB
*PARAOXON
*PHENYLACETIC ACID
*SODIUM PHENYLACETATE


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals