| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Internal Medicine I and Neuroendocrinology, University of Luebeck, D-23538 Luebeck, Germany
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Bernd Schultes, M.D., Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Luebeck, Germany. E-mail address: schultes{at}kfg.mu-luebeck.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinically, the regulatory effects of plasma glucose on food intake may be relevant for the frequently observed gain in body weight during therapies that lower plasma glucose, e.g. sulfonylurea, thiazolidinediones, and insulin, in patients with type 2 diabetes (8, 9). Although weight gain during improvement of glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients has been attributed to decreased basal metabolic rate and glucosuria (10), increased food intake induced by lowered plasma glucose levels may also contribute to the weight gain. Evidence for this view derives also from findings that plasma glucose thresholds for the initiation of hormonal counterregulation and hypoglycemic symptoms in type 2 diabetic patients are shifted into the normal range, i.e. euglycemia (11). Thus, hunger may occur at higher plasma glucose levels in those patients than in healthy subjects and may be increased during plasma glucose-lowering therapies. On the other hand, repeated episodes of low plasma glucose have been shown to decrease plasma glucose thresholds for hormonal counterregulation and symptoms (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22), suggesting a rapid adaptation of the brain to such conditions. Whether a similar adaptation also exists in regard to feelings of hunger is not known. If it does, an increase in feelings of hunger and food intake during plasma glucose-lowering therapies would be highly unlikely. Here we tested whether the stimulatory effect of low plasma glucose on hunger is attenuated after repeated episodes of hypoglycemia. Hunger was assessed by rating scales during three consecutive episodes of mild insulin-induced hypoglycemia in normal weight, healthy men. Also, short-term memory recall of food-related words in relation to recall of words not related to food, which can be considered an implicit measure of hunger motivation (23), was tested before and during the first and third hypoglycemic clamps.
Metformin, in contrast to other plasma glucose-lowering agents, improves glycemic control without increasing body weight (24, 25). Moreover, the substance has been shown to decrease body weight in obese subjects with (26, 27, 28, 29) and without (30, 31) type 2 diabetes and to reduce feelings of hunger (26) and food intake (10, 26, 31, 32, 33). The fact that metformin lowers plasma glucose levels without increasing body weight suggests that the substance may interact with the modulation of hunger by the plasma glucose concentration. To test this additional hypothesis, experiments were performed twice in all subjects, once while taking metformin and another time while taking placebo. To assess whether the supposed influence of metformin on feelings of hunger was also associated with concurrent changes in food intake, the number of standard cookies consumed by the subjects within 20 min after the last hypoglycemic episode was counted. Also, serum leptin and insulin concentrations were measured to control for a potential influence of these hormones on feelings of hunger. Because changes in resting energy expenditure (REE), in addition to eating behavior, represent another mechanism essentially contributing to the regulation of body weight (34), we additionally performed indirect calorimetry measurements during the experiments.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fifteen normal weight, healthy men participated in the experiments (mean ± SEM age, 26.7 ± 0.9 yr; body mass index, 23.3 ± 0.5 kg/m2). Exclusion criteria were chronic or acute illness, current medication of any kind, smoking, alcohol or drug abuse, obesity (body mass index, >27 kg/m2), or diabetes and hypertension in first degree relatives. Each subject gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the local ethics committee.
Study design and measurements
The study was performed in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over design with the order of conditions balanced across subjects. In one condition, subjects received 850 mg metformin twice daily for a 16-d period; in the other, placebo was administered with a 4-wk interval between the two treatment periods. Compliance with drug treatment was assessed by repeated telephone calls and in an interview at the end of the treatment period. On the last 2 d of the treatment period (d 15 and 16), during which hypoglycemic clamps were performed, the subject took the study medication in the presence of the investigator. The subjects underwent a total of three hypoglycemic clamps, two on d 15 and the last on d 16.
Symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia were assessed every 15 min by a standard questionnaire throughout all hypoglycemic clamps. The questionnaire required ratings from 0 (none) to 9 (severe) of the following 14 symptoms: hunger, tingling, tremor, palpitations, sweating, itching, blurred vision, physical indisposition, weakness, difficulty in thinking, anxiety, faintness, dizziness, and irritability.
During the baseline period as well as after 140 min of the first and third hypoglycemic clamps, a short-term memory test was performed, comprising the oral presentation of a list of words. The words belonged to three semantic categories: neutral words such as tree and field, food-related words such as ham and eggs, and emotional words such as mother and friend. The list included five words from each semantic category in random order, and parallel lists were used for repeated testing. One minute after presentation of the wordlist the subject was required to recall verbally all words he remembered within 1 min. The percentage of correctly recalled food-related words in relation to the total number of recalled words was calculated and considered as an implicit measure of hunger motivation (23).
Serum insulin and leptin concentrations were measured every 15 min during the baseline periods and the initial 120-min interval of the first and third clamps. Determination of these hormones was performed as previously described (35). The responses of epinephrine, norepinephrine, ACTH, cortisol, GH, and glucagon to hypoglycemia were also measured. These data together with results for pooled symptomatic responses have been previously reported (36). Briefly, hormonal and symptomatic responses were attenuated during the third hypoglycemia compared with those during the first hypoglycemia. Metformin did not influence hormonal and autonomic symptom responses to repeated hypoglycemia, except for slightly enhancing the response of GH and neuroglycopenic symptoms.
Indirect calorimetry was performed during the baseline periods and twice (at 60 and 120 min) during the first and third hypoglycemic clamps. Respiratory gas exchanges [O2 uptake (VO2) and exhaled CO2 (VCO2)] was measured by placing a ventilated hood (MBM-200 Deltatrac II, Datex, Helsinki, Finland) over the head of the subject for 10 min. After the end of the third hypoglycemic clamp, standard cookies (Leibnitz Butterkeks, Bahlsen, Hanover, Germany), each weighing 5 g (3.90 g carbohydrates, 0.55 g fat, and 0.45 g protein) and containing 22.3 kcal, were offered. The number of cookies the subject consumed within the next 20 min was counted. During the baseline periods (d 15 and 16), subjects were weighed while wearing only underwear, and body weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg.
Hypoglycemic clamps
On d 15 of the treatment period subjects reported to the medical research unit at 0800 h and then underwent two hypoglycemic clamps, one in the morning and another in the afternoon. Subjects were instructed not to eat after 2200 h on the preceding day and not to have breakfast on d 15. Also, until the end of the clamps subjects were not allowed to eat. The setting and procedure of the hypoglycemic clamps have previously been described in detail (36). Briefly, after a 30-min baseline period starting at 0900 h, plasma glucose was lowered to a plateau of 2.8 mmol/liter by infusion of insulin (H-insulin, Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., Frankfurt, Germany) at a rate of 1.5 mU/min·kg. Ninety minutes after the start of insulin infusion (1100 h), plasma glucose was further decreased to a plateau of 2.5 mmol/liter for another 60 min by increasing the rate of insulin infusion to 2.0 mU/min·kg. Plasma glucose levels were measured (by glucose analyzer, Beckman, Munich, Germany) every 5 min, and a variable infusion of 20% dextrose solution was adjusted to maintain plasma glucose plateaus. At 1200 h the insulin infusion stopped, and plasma glucose levels were returned to normal by dextrose infusion. At 1300 h the insulin infusion was started again at a rate of 2.0 mU/min·kg to induce the second hypoglycemia. During this hypoglycemic clamp a plasma glucose plateau of 2.5 mmol/liter was achieved for 90 min (until 1500 h). After the clamp, the subject went home. Eating was allowed until 2200 h on this day. On d 16 of the treatment period subjects again reported to the research unit at 0800 h. The third clamp was performed in the same way as the first hypoglycemic clamp (starting at 0900 h). Throughout the experiments the subject was not informed about his plasma glucose concentration.
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as the mean ± SEM. Baseline data for d 15 and 16 were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures, including the factors day for comparisons between d 15 and 16 and treatment for the effects of metformin vs. placebo. For pairwise comparisons a t test was used. Data assessed during the clamps were also analyzed by ANOVA including the factors hypo for the multiple measurements during the clamps, treatment for the effects of metformin vs. placebo, and day for differences between the first vs. third hypoglycemia. A sample size of 15 subjects provided a statistical power of 0.90 to detect a difference of 20% in the increase in hunger ratings and that in other symptoms between the first and third hypoglycemia (i.e. the day by hypo interaction term) as well as between the metformin and placebo condition (i.e. the treatment by hypo interaction term). P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1
summarizes the baseline values on d 15 and 16. Baseline values on d 16 indicated that after the hypoglycemic clamps on d 15, subjects had gained, on the average, 0.5 kg compared with values before these clamps (P < 0.001) regardless of whether they took placebo or metformin (P = 0.857). Compared with d 15 values, baseline serum leptin concentrations were found to be increased by 63% in the metformin condition and by 35% higher in the placebo condition on d 16 (P < 0.001). The difference in leptin increase between the two treatment conditions was not significant (P = 0.367). Baseline plasma glucose (P < 0.001) and serum insulin (P < 0.001) concentrations were also higher on d 16 than on d 15. Again, these changes were not dependent on the treatment (P > 0.25 for both variables). Baseline hunger ratings did not differ between d 15 and 16 (P = 0.886) or between the two treatment conditions (P = 0.355). The percentage of recalled food-related words in relation to the total number of recalled words was slightly reduced on d 16 compared with that on d 15, but the difference did not reach significance (P = 0.095). The VCO2 was higher on d 16 than on d 15 (P = 0.023), and REE tended to be increased on d 16 (P = 0.071). These changes did not depend on the treatment condition (P > 0.25 for both variables).
|
Plasma glucose and self-rated feelings of hunger during the clamps
The time courses of plasma glucose concentration during the first and third clamps were closely comparable and did not differ between the metformin and placebo conditions (Fig. 1A
). The total amount of glucose infused per kilogram body weight on d 15 (0.68 ± 0.05 vs. 0.63 ± 0.05 g/kg; P = 0.398) and on d 16 (0.11 ± 0.02 vs. 0.15 ± 0.03 g/kg; P = 0.177) did not differ between the metformin and placebo conditions.
|
During the third hypoglycemic clamp, feelings of hunger also markedly increased (P < 0.001), and this increase was remarkably comparable with that during the first hypoglycemia (P = 0.304). This was true for both the placebo and metformin conditions (P = 0.897 for day x treatment interaction). It is notable that overall the hypoglycemia-induced increased in hunger ratings was significantly lower in the metformin than in the placebo condition (P = 0.015 for treatment x hypo interaction).
Self-rated symptom scores during the clamps
Analysis of the other symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia revealed that self-rated tremor (P < 0.001), palpitations (P < 0.001), sweating (P < 0.001), blurred vision (P = 0.003), physical indisposition (P = 0.013), weakness (P = 0.012), difficulty in thinking (P = 0.014), faintness (P < 0.001), dizziness (P = 0.007), and irritability (P = 0.002), but not anxiety (P = 0.309), were lower during the third than during the first hypoglycemia (Fig. 2
). Metformin treatment had no influence on these changes (P > 0.23 for all variables). Self-rated scores for tingling and itching did not change during the hypoglycemic clamps (P > 0.17 for both), and there was not a difference between the first and third hypoglycemia (P > 0.39 for both) or between the placebo and metformin conditions for these symptoms (P > 0.25 for both; data not shown).
|
The percentage of recalled food-related words in relation to the total number of recalled words significantly increased during the first (placebo, from 34.2 ± 2.5 to 42.2 ± 5.1; metformin, from 30.5 ± 1.3 to 38.5 ± 2.6) and third (placebo, from 28.3 ± 2.8 to 39.4 ± 2.6; metformin, from 27.9 ± 2.5 to 39.0 ± 1.9) hypoglycemia (P < 0.001), but this increase did not differ between the first and third hypoglycemia (P = 0.634) or between the placebo and metformin conditions (P = 0.256; Fig. 3
). The number of cookies the subjects consumed within 20 min after the third hypoglycemic clamp did not differ between the metformin and placebo conditions (34.3 ± 3.1 vs. 35.1 ± 3.4; i.e. 765 ± 69 vs. 783 ± 76 kcal; P = 0.676).
|
During the first 120 min of the first and third hypoglycemic clamps, serum levels of insulin rapidly increased, as expected (P < 0.001; data not shown). However, concentrations did not differ between the first and third hypoglycemia (P = 0.597) or between the two treatment conditions (P = 0.488). Overall, serum leptin concentrations slightly decreased during the hypoglycemic clamps (P = 0.021; Fig. 4A
). Compared with the first hypoglycemic clamp, serum leptin concentrations were distinctly higher during the third hypoglycemic clamp (P < 0.001). According to values during the baseline periods, serum leptin concentrations were also lower in the metformin than in the placebo condition during the hypoglycemic clamps (P = 0.048). As illustrated in Fig. 4B
, the marked differences in serum leptin concentration between the baseline periods of d 15 and 16 as well as between the placebo and metformin conditions were not associated with the concurrent differences in hunger ratings. Also, despite distinctly higher serum leptin concentrations during the third than the first hypoglycemic clamp (e.g. at 120 min), hunger ratings during these clamps did not differ (Fig. 4B
).
|
During the hypoglycemic clamps, VCO2, VO2, respiratory quotient, and REE significantly increased on the average by 23 ± 4%, 6 ± 4%, 7 ± 5%, and 10 ± 5%, respectively (P < 0.001 for all variables; Fig. 5
). However, the increase in these variables did not differ between the first and third hypoglycemic clamps (P > 0.18 for all variables) and was not influenced by the treatment condition (P > 0.40 for all variables).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To our knowledge the lack of an adaptation of feelings of hunger to repeated episodes of hypoglycemia represents a novel finding with important physiological and clinical implications. Previous studies (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18) investigating symptomatic responses to recurrent hypoglycemia did not focus on feelings of hunger. Typically, data on hunger ratings were not analyzed separately but were pooled with rating scores of other hypoglycemic symptoms. Accordingly, the symptomatic response to hypoglycemia was attenuated after antecedent hypoglycemia in these studies. In agreement with this finding, in the present study changes in rating scores for the majority of symptoms were distinctly smaller during the third than during the first hypoglycemia. This attenuation of symptomatic responses is thought to represent an adaptation of the brain to hypoglycemia. However, the present data indicate that a comparable adaptation does not occur with regard to hunger feelings. One explanation for this finding could derive from the fact that various areas within the brain are involved in mediating different symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia. While autonomic nervous system activation, mediating many symptoms (37), is triggered by neuroglycopenia within the ventromedial hypothalamus (38, 39), there is evidence that the hunger-promoting effect of hypoglycemia results at least in part from an increased expression of prepro-orexin within the lateral hypothalamic area (40, 41). Thus, it may be possible that those hypothalamic areas differ in their adaptive responses to recurrent hypoglycemia.
The present finding sheds new light on the widespread assumption that hunger in response to hypoglycemia is mediated by an activation of the autonomic nervous system. This assumption is based on a previous study by Towler et al. (42) showing that panautonomic blockade by phentolamine, propanolol, and atropine sulfate, but not
- and ß-adrenergic blockade alone, significantly reduces feelings of hunger during hypoglycemia. It is notable in this study that panautomomic blockade also enhanced hypoglycemia-induced cognitive dysfunction. This finding in conjunction with others (43) indicates that atropine sulfate, which is known to cross the blood-brain barrier, exerts a direct effect on central nervous system function. Thus, the reduction of hunger produced by atropine during hypoglycemia may result from the blockade of central nervous muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and does not necessarily indicate an autonomic mediation of this symptom. Further evidence for an important role of central nervous muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the regulation of hunger derives from the recent finding that mice lacking the M3 subtype of this receptor are extremely hypophagic (44). This background may provide a plausible explanation for the hypoglycemia-induced hunger being preserved despite a markedly attenuated autonomic activation after antecedent hypoglycemia.
Interestingly, the recovery of normal plasma glucose levels after the first hypoglycemia was associated with a rapid reduction in hunger ratings occurring within 510 min after euglycemic levels were reached. Obviously, feelings of hunger respond rather quickly to changes in the plasma glucose concentration. However, although the close association between plasma glucose levels and hunger observed here is remarkable, it should also be considered that the induced changes in plasma glucose concentration were much larger than the spontaneous small declines in glucose that have previously been found to initiate meal intake (6, 7).
Metformin had no influence on baseline hunger ratings, but significantly reduced feelings of hunger during hypoglycemia. This finding points to a modulating influence of metformin on the hypoglycemia-induced hunger signal. However, it should also be noted that the reduction of hunger by metformin was only moderate, and subjects still experienced strong feelings of hunger during hypoglycemia. Possibly, the stimulatory effect of hypoglycemia on hunger, being much stronger than the counteracting influence of metformin, explains the failure of metformin to concurrently decrease posthypoglycemic weight gain (after the first two clamps) and food intake (after the third clamp). Taken together, it remains questionable whether the modest reduction in hypoglycemia-stimulated hunger after metformin administration contributes to the beneficial effects of the substance on body weight. On the other hand, it should be pointed out that the observed effect of metformin on hunger during hypoglycemia could be harmful in patients with diabetes, because it may decrease the drive to eat, thereby delaying the recovery of normoglycemia.
Although metformin has been shown to reduce food intake and hunger in animals (32, 33) as well as in humans (10, 26, 31), the mechanisms of this action remain obscure. While an effect via inhibiting hypothalamic neuropeptide Y expression can be excluded (32), the influence of metformin on other neuropeptides involved in the regulation of food intake has not been assessed to date. The present finding hints at a possible influence of metformin on hunger-regulating pathways activated by hypoglycemia. As mentioned above, hypoglycemia induced hyperphagia results at least in part from an increased expression of prepro-orexin within the lateral hypothalamic areas (40, 41), whereas the hypothalamic neuropeptide Y does not appear to be involved (45). However, it is not clear whether metformin after systemic administration is able to cross the blood-brain barrier to reach the hypothalamus. In this context, it is highly interesting that hypoglycemia-induced expression of prepro-orexin is acutely inhibited by ingestion of food, suggesting that visceral signals, presumably mediated via the nucleus of the solitary tract, also modulate hypothalamic prepro-orexin expression (46, 47). As metformin is known to accumulate in the gastrointestinal tract (48), it appears possible that the substance likewise exerts its anorectic effect via visceral signals to the brain.
Leptin levels on d 16 were distinctly increased compared with those on d 15. Furthermore, confirming previous results (31, 49, 50), leptin levels were markedly lower during metformin than during placebo treatment. Thus, the four different hypoglycemic clamp situations of the present study took place in the presence of four different levels of leptinemia. This is of relevance on the background that leptin has been claimed to be essentially involved the regulation of hunger. Data from the present study may argue against this view, as the marked differences in serum leptin concentration were not paralleled by concurrent differences in feelings of hunger under either hypoglycemic conditions or euglycemic baseline conditions. In fact, previous data were not entirely consistent with the idea that leptin directly influences feelings of hunger. Although changes in leptin levels upon food restriction in some studies (51, 52, 53, 54) were found to be correlated to feelings of hunger and satiety, in other studies (55, 56, 57) the leptin response to a meal as well as fasting morning leptin levels were not. In conjunction with those data, the present results suggest that leptin is involved in long-term, rather than short-term, regulation of food intake.
In conclusion, these data show that feelings of hunger do not adapt to repeated occurrence of mild hypoglycemic states, which is in contrast to many other subjective and physiological responses to hypoglycemia. These results may be relevant with regard to the body weight gain observed during improvement of glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients, because lowered plasma glucose levels probably enhance feelings of hunger, thereby increasing food intake. However, to confirm this hypothesis it remains to be shown that the glycemic threshold for hunger feelings is elevated in type 2 diabetic patients and that the reduced plasma glucose concentration in these patients is, in fact, associated with increased food intake. Furthermore, the present study shows that metformin modestly attenuates the hunger signal induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. However, this effect probably cannot account for the weight reduction seen after prolonged treatment with metformin.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received September 24, 2002.
Accepted December 11, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Trolle, A. Flyvbjerg, U. Kesmodel, and F.F. Lauszus Efficacy of metformin in obese and non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled cross-over trial Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2967 - 2973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chau-Van, M. Gamba, R. Salvi, R. C. Gaillard, and F. P. Pralong Metformin Inhibits Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate-Activated Kinase Activation and Prevents Increases in Neuropeptide Y Expression in Cultured Hypothalamic Neurons Endocrinology, February 1, 2007; 148(2): 507 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Schultes, A. Peters, M. Hallschmid, C. Benedict, V. Merl, K. M. Oltmanns, J. Born, H. L. Fehm, and W. Kern Modulation of Food Intake by Glucose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2005; 28(12): 2884 - 2889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |