| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Chair of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Surgery "F. Magrassi, A. Lanzara," Second University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Annamaria De Bellis, M.D., Istituto di Endocrinologia, Seconda Università di Napoli, via Pansini N. 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy. E-mail: annamaria.debellis{at}unina2.it.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
APA were found (at high titers) in 4 of 12 patients of group 1a (33.3%) but were absent in all patients in group 1b. APA were also found in 40 of 180 patients of group 2 (22.2%), 35 of them at low titers (group 2a) and 5 at high titers (group 2b). Twenty of the 140 autoimmune endocrine APA-negative patients studied (group 2c) and all APA-positive patients at low titers (group 2a) had normal pituitary function. Conversely, all APA-positive patients at high titers (groups 1a and 2b) had a severe isolated GHD. An inverse correlation between APA titers and GH peak serum response to insulin tolerance test in autoimmune endocrine patients was observed.
Our results suggest that APA, when detected at high titers, may be considered a good diagnostic tool to highlight the possible occurrence of GHD in adults with autoimmune endocrine diseases. Moreover, they may indicate an autoimmune pituitary involvement in adults with apparently idiopathic GHD, suggesting that the prevalence of autoimmune GHD is much higher than that so far considered.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of this study was 2-fold: first, to investigate the presence of APA in adults with idiopathic isolated severe GHD, diagnosed in childhood and confirmed in adulthood, in adults with acquired post-pituitary surgery GHD and in adults with autoimmune endocrine diseases; and second, to evaluate whether in autoimmune endocrine patients APA titer is correlated to the pituitary functional state and particularly to GH secretion.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twelve of 26 patients (group 1a, 7 females and 5 males; aged 2327 yr) with adult GHD had a past history of well known childhood-onset GHD without organic hypothalamic-pituitary disorders. All of them had been treated with recombinant GH in childhood until skeletal growth was completed, and then this therapy was stopped in all patients at least 5 yr before the revaluation of GH secretion in adulthood. All patients of this group had had a good growth response during childhood after GH therapy, without significant differences among them.
The remaining 14 of 26 patients (group 1b, 5 females and 9 males; aged 3150 yr) had an adult GHD secondary to surgery for pituitary and parasellar tumors performed at least 6 yr before. In particular, all of them had had transsphenoidal and/or transcranial route surgery: eight for nonsecreting pituitary adenomas and six for craniopharyngiomas. Subsequently, four of them developed panhypopituitarism and central diabetes insipidus (CDI), three developed panhypopituitarism alone, four developed FSH/LH and TSH deficiency, and three developed FSH/LH and ACTH deficiency. Hormone replacement with L-thyroxine, cortisone acetate, and intranasal desmopressin had been given appropriately. Hypogonadism had been treated with testosterone enanthate in men and a standard combined estrogen-progestin preparation in women.
Diagnosis of adult GHD was formulated in all patients according to the recommendation of the Growth Hormone Research Society (27). In particular, the response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia [insulin tolerance test (ITT)] and to arginine was considered impaired with a GH peak of less than 3 µg/liter and less than 1.0 µg/liter, respectively, as previously described (28, 29) with our minor modifications. According to these criteria, all patients in groups 1a and 1b presented with severe untreated GHD. Moreover, they had serum IGF-I levels below the normal range for age, sex, and nutritional state. GHD was considered as isolated when normal basal and dynamic secretion of other pituitary hormones was observed. None of the adults with childhood-onset GHD had a past history of cranial traumas or hypothalamic pituitary abnormalities on MRI. They were thus considered as being apparently idiopathic GHD, on the basis of these findings.
Moreover, 180 patients (group 2, 129 females and 51 males; aged 2950 yr) with autoimmune endocrine diseases [80 with Hashimotos thyroiditis, 59 with Graves disease, 15 with Addisons disease, 17 with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), 9 with CDI] were also studied. Patients with hypothyroid Hashimotos thyroiditis, Addisons disease, and CDI received appropriate replacement therapy. Hyperthyroid Graves patients and LADA patients received antithyroid and oral hypoglycemic drugs, respectively. The patients with hypothyroid Hashimotos thyroiditis were euthyroid under T4 replacement therapy for at least 5 yr. Hormonal pituitary function was also appropriately investigated in all patients of group 2. In particular, basal anterior pituitary hormones were evaluated in duplicate; ACTH, GH, TSH, FSH, LH, and prolactin (PRL) were determined by immunoradiometric analysis method using commercial kits. Dynamic behavior of these hormones was also studied by testing their response to CRH, TRH, and GnRH. Additionally, target organ hormones (free T4, free T3, testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, and cortisol) and IGF-I were also evaluated using commercial kits. As regards group 2, in all APA-positive patients and in a group of APA-negative patients matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to positive patients, GH was also investigated by testing its response to ITT and, when impaired, also to arginine. We chose these stimuli and not others suggested by some important reports (30, 31), taking into account the cost-benefit ratio, but also because none of our patients had diseases contraindicating the ITT (in fact patients with LADA were not tested, being all APA negative; see Results). Furthermore, IGF-I levels were also evaluated in these patients. Finally, an MRI of the hypothalamus and pituitary region was performed in all of these patients.
All subjects gave their informed consent to the study, which was approved by the local ethical committee.
APA
APA were evaluated in all patients in groups 1a, 1b, and 2. Sera from 20 patients (11 males and 9 females; aged 2952 yr) with pituitary adenomas (12 with acromegaly, 4 with PRL-secreting adenoma, and 4 with nonsecreting adenoma) and sera from 50 normal subjects matched for sex and age were also used as controls for detecting APA.
APA were detected by immunofluorescence method as described previously, with minor modifications (12, 13, 32) on cryostat sections of young baboon pituitary gland. In particular, fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat antihuman Ig sera were used to detect the presence of APA, and then positive serum samples were tested with fluorescein isothiocyanate goat antihuman IgG, IgM, and IgA sera separately. All sera were tested blindly, and two investigators evaluated the results in a double-blind manner. The samples were considered APA positive when showing an immunofluorescence pattern with strong granular intracytoplasmatic staining in some pituitary cells (about five in each field), but not a diffuse intracytoplasmatic staining involving the majority of the pituitary cells (21). Levels of APA were considered positive starting at dilution 1:2 and were expressed as end-point dilution titer. Finally, only in patients with apparently idiopathic GHD previously treated with human recombinant GH, the sera positive for APA were preabsorbed with an excess of GH (10-10 M) for 18 h at 4 C and then retested to exclude a possible presence of antibodies against GH.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis in APA-positive and APA-negative patients in group 2 was performed by ANOVA. The difference between frequencies of APA-positive patients with respect to APA-negative patients in group 2 was calculated by
2 test. The correlation between APA titers in group 2 and GH peak concentration after ITT was examined by the Spearmans rank-correlation analysis. In all tests, a P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
1/8) and all APA-negative patients had a normal pituitary function, including GH secretion, whereas all APA-positive patients at high titers (>1/8) had a severe GHD. The characteristics of autoimmune endocrine patients in group 2a, in group 2b, and in 20 of 140 patients of group 2c (in whom ITT was also performed) matched for sex, age, and BMI to patients of groups 2a and 2b are summarized in Table 1
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Circulating APA and, particularly, autoantibodies that selectively stained GH-producing cells have been detected by the immunofluorescence method in rare cases of apparently idiopathic GHD but also in some normal subjects (16, 21, 25). On the other hand, Crock et al. (26), using an immunoblotting method, demonstrated APA in only a small population of patients with idiopathic GHD but not in normal subjects. This suggests that this method could be more specific with respect to conventional immunofluorescence assay for detecting autoimmunity to the pituitary. The nature and the clinical significance of APA are still discussed. The recent identification of the 49-kDa autoantigen associated with lymphocytic hypophysitis as
-enolase suggests that autoantibodies to
-enolase could be good markers of autoimmune pituitary disease (35). From this point of view,
-enolase can be considered one of the targets of APA, such as 21-hydroxylase in autoimmune Addisons disease can be identified as one of targets of adrenocortical autoantibodies (36). Concerning the clinical significance, some APA are harmless, whereas others can activate intracellular signaling and exert biological function.
In the present study, we investigated serum APA by immunofluorescence in adults with childhood-onset GHD and in those with GHD secondary to surgery for pituitary and parasellar tumors. The first important result emerging from this study is that APA are present (at high titers) in 4 of 12 (33.3%) patients with idiopathic GHD. Our results suggest that some (1 of 3) patients, previously labeled as idiopathic GHD, seem to have an autoimmune involvement of the pituitary gland.
In our study, we detected APA using immunofluorescence assay and not methods thought to be more specific to confirm whether the immunostained pituitary cells are GH-secreting cells. However, the lack of variations of immunostaining when APA-positive sera were preabsorbed with GH seems to exclude the possibility that the APA are antibodies against GH that were raised during previous recombinant GH treatment.
On the contrary, we showed an absence of APA in all adult patients with GHD secondary to surgery for pituitary and parasellar tumors. However, Crock (8) demonstrated by immunoblotting method high titers of APA not only in patients with lymphocytic hypophysitis but also in one patient submitted to pituitary surgery. This apparent discrepancy with our results probably depends on the different time of APA detection from the time of the surgery rather than by the different method used. Concerning this, a longitudinal study of APA in patients from surgery onward could be useful and is currently in progress.
We investigated APA also in patients with autoimmune endocrine diseases, with pituitary adenomas, and in normal controls. According to previous studies (8), APA were found in autoimmune endocrine patients (22%), in those with pituitary adenomas (30%), and in normal controls (4%). However, all APA-positive patients with pituitary adenomas and APA-positive normal controls have low titers of these antibodies (cut-off limit
1/8) suggesting that they could be considered only an epiphenomenon in these cases.
Bottazzo et al. (20), in screening APA by immunofluorescence in sera of a cohort of patients with autoimmune polyglandular diseases, found some of them positive for APA at low titers but without evidence of pituitary function impairment. This seems to support the hypothesis that APA cannot be considered autoimmune markers of pituitary insufficiency. Our results are in agreement with this assumption, but only with respect to the presence of APA at low titers. In fact, all APA-positive autoimmune endocrine patients with low titers (
1/8) showed normal pituitary function and normal morphological imaging of the pituitary gland, whereas all APA-positive patients with high titers (>1/8) showed an isolated severe GHD and normal imaging (in three patients) or imaging suggestive of lymphocytic adenohypophysitis and lymphocytic infundibulo-neurohypophysitis and/or partial empty sella (in the other two cases, respectively). Thus, we conclude that APA, only when present at high titers, can be considered as good autoimmune markers of pituitary impairment in autoimmune endocrine patients. Moreover, the finding of APA at high titers in some patients with apparently idiopathic GHD and in patients with GHD associated to autoimmune endocrine diseases in the absence of alteration in the secretion of other pituitary hormones, as well as the inverse correlation between APA titers and the serum peak GH response to ITT, suggest an autoimmune mechanism as the cause of GH impairment in these cases. This also indicates that somatotrophs can be an early target of the autoimmune process. On the other hand, the absence of APA in patients with GHD secondary to surgery for pituitary and parasellar tumors seems to exclude that APA are the result of pituitary gland damage. In conclusion, our results suggest that APA could be considered a good diagnostic tool for highlighting the possible occurrence of a form of GHD, thus inducing the performance of dynamic tests for GH secretion in patients with autoimmune endocrine diseases positive for APA at high titers. Moreover, they may indicate an autoimmune pituitary involvement in adults with apparently idiopathic GHD, suggesting that the prevalence of autoimmune GHD is much higher than previously considered.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
A.D.B. and A.Bi. contributed equally to the manuscript.
Abbreviations: APA, Antipituitary antibodies; BMI, body mass index; CDI, central diabetes insipidus; GHD, GH deficiency; ITT, insulin tolerance test; LADA, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PRL, prolactin.
Received July 8, 2002.
Accepted November 14, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-enolase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:752757This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Tanriverdi, A. De Bellis, A. Bizzarro, A. A. Sinisi, G. Bellastella, E. Pane, A. Bellastella, K. Unluhizarci, A. Selcuklu, F. F Casanueva, et al. Antipituitary antibodies after traumatic brain injury: is head trauma-induced pituitary dysfunction associated with autoimmunity? Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 159(1): 7 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. De Bellis, F. Kelestimur, A. Agostino Sinisi, G. Ruocco, G. Tirelli, M. Battaglia, G. Bellastella, G. Conzo, F. Tanriverdi, K. Unluhizarci, et al. Anti-hypothalamus and anti-pituitary antibodies may contribute to perpetuate the hypopituitarism in patients with Sheehan's syndrome Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2008; 158(2): 147 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Caturegli Autoimmune Hypophysitis: An Underestimated Disease in Search of Its Autoantigen(s) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2038 - 2040. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. DE BELLIS, A. COLAO, R. PIVONELLO, A. SAVOIA, M. BATTAGLIA, G. RUOCCO, G. TIRELLI, G. LOMBARDI, A. BELLASTELLA, and A. BIZZARRO Antipituitary Antibodies in Idiopathic Hyperprolactinemic Patients Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., June 1, 2007; 1107(1): 129 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Manetti, I. Lupi, L. L. Morselli, S. Albertini, M. Cosottini, L. Grasso, M. Genovesi, G. Pinna, S. Mariotti, F. Bogazzi, et al. Prevalence and Functional Significance of Antipituitary Antibodies in Patients with Autoimmune and Non-Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2176 - 2181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. De Bellis, A. A. Sinisi, M. Conte, C. Coronella, G. Bellastella, D. Esposito, D. Pasquali, G. Ruocco, A. Bizzarro, and A. Bellastella Antipituitary Antibodies against Gonadotropin-Secreting Cells in Adult Male Patients with Apparently Idiopathic Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 604 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. De Bellis, M. Salerno, M. Conte, C. Coronella, G. Tirelli, M. Battaglia, V. Esposito, G. Ruocco, G. Bellastella, A. Bizzarro, et al. Antipituitary Antibodies Recognizing Growth Hormone (GH)-Producing Cells in Children with Idiopathic GH Deficiency and in Children with Idiopathic Short Stature J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2484 - 2489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cocco, A. Meloni, F. Boi, G. Pinna, R. Possenti, S. Mariotti, and G.-L. Ferri Median Eminence Dopaminergic Nerve Terminals: A Novel Target in Autoimmune Polyendocrine Syndrome? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4108 - 4111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |