| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: R. Jeffrey Chang, M.D., Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0633. E-mail: rjchang{at}ucsd.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These findings demonstrated that in PCOS women, LH secretion and gonadotropin responses to GnRH were not influenced by insulin administration. Insulin infusion had little effect on steroid hormone production with the possible exception of androstenedione. These results suggest that inappropriate LH secretion in PCOS is not a direct consequence of insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eleven women with PCOS and nine normal women with regular menstrual cycles were recruited for study. All PCOS subjects exhibited excessive facial hair growth and had irregular menstrual bleeding ranging from three to six bleeding episodes per year. Serum androgen levels were elevated in each PCOS subject (Table 1
). In addition, all women had ultrasound evidence of bilateral polycystic ovaries (27). Late onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia was excluded by a serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone level (17-OHP4) of less than 3 ng/ml (<9.1 nmol/liter). The normal subjects were monitored by menstrual calendar for 3 months and by urinary LH testing for 1 month before study to establish the regularity of their cycles. None of the subjects had received any hormone medication for at least 3 months before study. In PCOS women, the mean (±SE) age was 28.6 ± 0.6 yr and not significantly greater than that of the normal control group, 26.3 ± 0.8 yr. The mean body mass index (BMI) was significantly greater in PCOS subjects compared with that of normal women (35.3 ± 0.8 vs. 27.4 ± 0.7, P < 0.02), whereas the difference in mean waist-to-hip ratio (0.88 ± 0.03 vs. 0.80 ± 0.06) failed to achieve statistical significance. Circulating TSH and PRL levels were normal and not significantly different between groups. The study had been approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Diego, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant before study.
|
Each subject was admitted to the General Clinical Research Center at the University of California, San Diego, for 2 d of study. The PCOS subjects were tested at random, whereas normal control subjects were studied during the mid-follicular phase defined as d 68. On d 1 of study an iv cannula was inserted and after 30 min baseline blood samples were drawn. At 0800, blood samples were obtained at 10-min intervals for 12 h. On d 2 of study, after an overnight rest, beginning at 0800, three successive doses of GnRH (2, 10, and 20 µg) were administered iv at 4-h intervals over a continuous 12-h period. The sequence of GnRH dosing was intentional and not randomized to minimize potential residual increases in serum LH before administration of the next dose of GnRH. The GnRH (Factrel) was kindly provided by Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. None of the PCOS subjects had experienced recent ovulation as evidenced by changes in their menstrual patterns or scant bleeding episodes unaccompanied by premenstrual molimina. In addition, at the time of study each PCOS woman had serum progesterone (P4) levels of less than 1 ng/ml (<3.0 nmol/liter) at the baseline sample. Frequent blood samples were obtained before and for up to 120 min after each dose of GnRH. Subsequently, each subject was readmitted to the General Clinical Research Center and the 2-d study protocol was repeated during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. In PCOS and normal subjects, the repeat protocol was administered at a minimum interval of 1 month.
Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp
Studies were performed in the morning after a 12-h overnight fast. At 2100 h, an 18-gauge iv catheter was inserted into an antecubital vein and an infusion of normal saline was started. At 0700 h, another iv catheter was inserted in a retrograde fashion in a hand vein, with the hand placed in a hand warmer for sampling of arterialized blood. An iv infusion of insulin (Humulin; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN) diluted in 0.15 mol/liter saline containing 1% wt/vol human albumin was then begun at a rate of 80 mU/m2·min, which was started 2 h before the first GnRH dose and continued for 12 h. Potassium and phosphate were given iv to compensate for the intracellular movement of these ions and to maintain normal blood levels. A variable infusion of 20% glucose was delivered to maintain a plasma glucose concentration of 4.72 mol/liter (85 ng/dl). Blood samples were obtained every 5 min for measurement of plasma glucose with a glucose analyzer (YSI 2700 analyzer; Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Springs, OH). During the last 30 min of insulin infusion, blood samples were obtained at 10-min intervals for determination of plasma glucose concentrations.
The glucose infusion rate in each patient was calculated as the amount of glucose (milligram) infused per kilogram body weight during the last 30 min of the clamp study. The mean steady-state insulin level achieved at the end of the clamp is known to suppress hepatic glucose output and, therefore, the glucose infusion rate was equivalent to the glucose disposal rate.
Assays
Serum LH and FSH concentrations were measured by RIA with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs), respectively, of 5.4% and 8.0% for LH and 3.0% and 4.6% for FSH (Diagnostic Products Corp., Los Angeles, CA). Serum concentrations of estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), androstenedione (A4), and testosterone (T) were measured by well-established RIA with intraassay CVs less than 7%. Serum P4, 17-OHP4, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) were measured by RIA with intraassay CVs less than 7% (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX). Serum insulin levels were measured by a double antibody RIA with an assay sensitivity of 2 µU/ml and intra- and interassay CVs of 7% and 9%, respectively. Plasma glucose levels were determined by the glucose oxidase method (Yellow Springs Instrument Co.) with an intraassay CV less than 2% and an intraassay CV of 3%.
Pulse analysis
LH pulse activity was analyzed using the Cluster pulse detection algorithm (Veldhuis 86). A cluster configuration of 2 x 2 and t statistics of 2.45 x 2.45 were chosen to minimize false positive and false negative errors. Dose-dependent intrasample variance was assessed by employing a second-degree polynomial regression of SD as function of hormone concentration. Pulse number per 12 h and mean pulse amplitude (difference in serum concentration between the preceding nadir and the pulse peak) were determined for each subject.
Statistics
Depending on the analysis, LH responses were measured as the difference between the maximal and baseline levels (maximal increment), and the maximal percent change from baseline. A log-transformation was applied when appropriate, and square root transformation was used for percent change in LH response. To determine interaction between group and dose as well as main effects, two-group repeated measures ANOVA and analysis of covariance were used. Post hoc testing was done with a Bonferroni correction. Comparisons of mean baseline values between PCOS and normal women were performed using independent Students t tests (SPSS 11.0 software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Correlations among variables were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient method.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Baseline hormone values are shown in Table 1
. In PCOS, mean (±SE) circulating levels of LH, T, A, E1, E2, 17-OHP4, and fasting insulin were significantly greater than those of normal controls. Serum FSH, DHEA-S, P4, and glucose levels were similar in both groups.
Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp
In the PCOS group, mean steady-state plasma insulin levels, 235 ± 25.5 µU/ml, resulting from the hyperinsulinemic clamp were significantly (P = 0.02) higher than those achieved in normal women, 173 ± 19.3 µU/ml, despite equivalent infusion rates and similar serum glucose concentrations (Fig. 1
). Steady-state serum glucose levels were maintained between 85 and 90 mg/dl in both groups. The mean glucose disposal rate in PCOS subjects was significantly less (P < 0.02) than that found in normal women and indicative of insulin resistance.
|
The composite mean 12-h serum LH concentration in PCOS was significantly higher than that of normal women as expected (Table 2
). Assessment of pulsatile LH secretion in PCOS women revealed that the mean pulse frequency value, pulses/12 h, was significantly greater than that found in the normal women. The corresponding mean pulse amplitude in PCOS women was higher, but not statistically different from that of the normal group.
|
Effect of insulin infusion on gonadotropin responses to GnRH
In the absence of insulin administration, PCOS subjects exhibited significantly higher (P < 0.02) mean maximal serum LH responses to multidose GnRH compared with those of normal women (Fig. 2
), which is consistent with previous results from our group (1). In PCOS women, there were subtle increases in mean baseline LH levels before each successive dose of GnRH, which likely represented carryover effect as a result of prior GnRH stimulation. These increases were accompanied by corresponding increments of LH after GnRH, in a dose-dependent manner. In normal women a similar pattern of GnRH-stimulated LH release was found. Notably, in PCOS and normal women, the mean maximal rise of LH was related to the respective baseline LH concentration as the percent incremental change with each dose of GnRH was equivalent within and between groups.
|
At the time of insulin administration in PCOS women, the mean preinfusion concentration of serum LH was 4.0 ± 1.2 mIU/ml. An effect of insulin was not apparent 2 h after initiation of the clamp, as the mean level of circulating LH was 4.7 ± 0.9 mIU/ml (Fig. 3
). In response to multidose GnRH, significant increases in serum LH responses in PCOS women were noted, the pattern of which was essentially the same as that demonstrated without insulin infusion. The progressive mean maximal rise of LH in response to 2-µg and 10-µg doses of GnRH corresponded to their respective baseline levels, in contrast to the response to 20 µg, which was of lesser absolute magnitude and, therefore, lower relative to baseline. In PCOS women, insulin infusion was not associated with differences in relative LH responsiveness to GnRH as the percent incremental change at each dose was equivalent to that found without insulin administration (Fig. 4
). The similarity of responsiveness in PCOS women before and during insulin infusion was reflective of the significant positive correlation between maximal GnRH-stimulated LH levels and preinjection baseline serum LH as depicted in Fig. 5
. A lack of insulin effect on LH responsiveness to GnRH was also evident in normal women. Serum LH levels before, and 2 h after beginning the infusion of insulin, did not vary and baseline preinjection LH levels and mean maximal LH responses to multidose GnRH were comparable in the presence and absence of insulin infusion (Fig. 3
). In PCOS and normal women, baseline serum FSH and GnRH-stimulated FSH release were not altered by insulin administration, as responses before and during the hyperinsulinemic clamp were similar.
|
|
|
Effect of insulin infusion on steroid hormone levels
Determination of mean circulating levels of serum androgens before and at the end (pooled samples during the last hour) of the hyperinsulinemic clamp, conducted during frequent sampling (without GnRH stimulation), showed that in PCOS, the mean baseline serum androstenedione level, was decreased significantly (Fig. 6
). The time-course response during insulin infusion revealed that serum A4 declined significantly within 2 h of commencing insulin infusion and remained suppressed throughout the interval of insulin administration (Fig. 6
). Normal women also sustained a significant reduction of mean serum A4 after insulin infusion. By comparison, in both PCOS and normal women, serum testosterone levels before and at the end of the insulin clamp were unaltered (Table 3
). In addition, circulating levels of E1, E2, 17-OHP4, and DHEA-S in both groups before and at the end of insulin infusion failed to demonstrate any significant differences.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
These findings clarify the results of previous preliminary studies, which showed that GnRH-stimulated LH responses in both normal and PCOS women were significantly decreased during a 4-h hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp compared with those found with saline infusion (28). In that study, lowered LH responsiveness during insulin infusion was associated with reduced preinfusion basal levels of circulating LH, which likely accounted for the apparent insulin-related LH suppression. Our results are consistent with previous studies, which have not been able to establish an effect of insulin on LH or FSH release. In normal women undergoing long-term insulin administration by a 16-h hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, mean serum LH levels, measured every hour, remained unchanged during the entire course of infusion (6). In women with PCOS, an attempt to identify whether insulin infusion influenced gonadotropin secretion failed to demonstrate conclusive results (7). During 6-h insulin infusions randomized to either one of a consecutive 2 d in PCOS and normal women, consistent alterations in mean serum LH, LH pulse frequency or pulse amplitude, and LH release after GnRH could not be documented. Sequence effects of study d 1 vs. study d 2 were readily apparent, which may have obscured any influence of insulin on gonadotropin release. These sequence effects were attributed to spontaneous changes in basal gonadotropin secretion.
The inability of insulin to induce alterations in LH secretion in PCOS women is relevant to studies that have shown an inverse correlation between 24-h insulin levels and both serum LH and LH pulse amplitude (29). In that study, it was also demonstrated that hyperinsulinemia was positively correlated to BMI, whereas insulin sensitivity had an inverse linear relationship to BMI. The parallel relationship between hyperinsulinemia and BMI precluded determination of a possible independent inhibitory effect of insulin on LH secretion. Considering the data of the current study, it seems as if obesity would be more likely to exert a restrictive influence on the level of circulating LH compared with an effect related to hyperinsulinemia.
Our in vivo findings are in contrast to previous results obtained from in vitro animal studies, which demonstrated that insulin enhanced GnRH-mediated LH release from rat pituitary cells by increasing gonadotrope sensitivity to GnRH in a dose-dependent manner (3, 4, 5). The concentration of insulin used to pretreat cells was physiologically relevant compared with that achieved during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp employed in the current in vivo study. Similar studies conducted in the same rodent model have shown that high physiological doses of insulin enhanced LH responses to GnRH, whereas progressive increases in concentration inhibited LH release in a bimodal manner (30). In our study, the mean steady-state level of insulin achieved during infusion was about 275 µU/ml, which is greater than levels generally encountered in PCOS. Whether lower levels of hyperinsulinemia may have altered gonadotropin secretion or responsiveness to GnRH is unknown. Alternatively, the in vivo environment of our study may have precluded expression of an insulin effect, as insulin-mediated increases in LH responsiveness, in vitro, have not been observed using serum supplemented media (3).
We observed a significant difference in steady-state insulin levels between PCOS and normal women despite similar rates of insulin infusion and equivalent glucose concentrations. The cause for this discrepancy may have been due to decreased clearance of insulin in the PCOS group in whom the mean BMI was significantly higher. A similar disparity of circulating insulin levels during insulin infusion has been observed previously in obese, weight-matched PCOS and normal women undergoing hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp studies (7). In both studies, assessment of insulin metabolic clearance was not performed.
The mean serum A4 level was significantly decreased during insulin infusion in both PCOS and normal women whereas serum 17-OH P4, DHEA-S, and T levels were unchanged. Previously, it has been demonstrated in normal men and women that short-term insulin infusions at physiological doses of less than 100 µU/ml were associated with an acute rise of circulating A4 levels (31). At insulin levels beyond 100 µU/ml, the serum A4 increment was not significant from baseline values. Similar results were found in women with PCOS who were randomly studied on the first of two consecutive study days (7). In those PCOS subjects studied on the second day of study, insulin administration failed to induce a significant rise in circulating A4 levels. The lack of serum A4 response on d 2 may have represented a carry over effect of the first day of study or, possibly, attributed to the relatively short length of infusion of 6 h. The latter consideration was not corroborated by our findings, as the length of insulin administration was 10 h. In addition, an acute effect of insulin was indicated by the significant decline of serum A4 within 2 h of infusion, as indicated by the time-course pattern of response. That the serum A4 response may have reflected alteration in clearance is unlikely because corresponding changes in serum E1 were not observed during insulin infusion. Serum T levels did not vary throughout 10 h of insulin administration, which is consistent with some, but not all studies (6, 7, 31). Dunaif (7) found significant reductions in serum T during insulin infusion, which was unlikely due to increased 17-oxido-reductase, as suggested by concomitant increases in serum estradiol. Studies to determine differences in the metabolic clearance of testosterone were not performed. We were also unable to detect alterations in 17-OHP4 and DHEA-S. However, Nestler et al. (6) demonstrated a significant decline in serum DHEA-S levels in normal women and a woman with hyperandrogenism at the end of a 16-h hyperinsulinemic clamp. The length of insulin administration or resultant steady-state concentration during the present experiments may have been insufficient to expose an effect of insulin on DHEA-S. Summarily, our findings strongly suggest that insulin administration by the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp method exerts little effect on basal steroid hormone levels in women with PCOS with the possible exception of serum A4. The significant decrease of circulating A4 must be considered in light of inconsistent findings from other studies, which have demonstrated either an increase or no change as a result of insulin infusion. Further investigation of insulin action on ovarian steroidogenesis is necessary to fully elucidate the role of insulin.
In summary, our findings have clearly shown that in PCOS women, LH secretion and gonadotropin responses to GnRH were not influenced by insulin administration. Moreover, insulin infusion appeared to have little effect on ovarian steroid or adrenal androgen production with the possible exception of androstenedione. These results suggest that inappropriate LH secretion in PCOS is not a consequence of insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinemia. Alternatively, additional studies are necessary in PCOS to determine whether gonadotropin secretion is susceptible to hyperinsulinemia after reversal of insulin resistance.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: A4, Androstenedione; BMI, body mass index; CV, coefficient of variation; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; E1, estrone; E2, estradiol; 17-OHP4, 17-hydroxyprogesterone; P4, progesterone; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; T, testosterone.
Received May 12, 2003.
Accepted August 11, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activity and serum free testosterone after reduction of insulin secretion in polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 335:617622
activity and serum androgens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:40754079This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. R. Doi Neuroendocrine Dysfunction in PCOS: A Critique of Recent Reviews Clin. Med. Res., September 1, 2008; 6(2): 47 - 53. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lawson, S. Jain, S. Sun, K. Patel, P. J. Malcolm, and R. J. Chang Evidence for Insulin Suppression of Baseline Luteinizing Hormone in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and Normal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2089 - 2096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.K. Blank, C.R. McCartney, and J.C. Marshall The origins and sequelae of abnormal neuroendocrine function in polycystic ovary syndrome Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 351 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. L. Pagan, S. S. Srouji, Y. Jimenez, A. Emerson, S. Gill, and J. E. Hall Inverse Relationship between Luteinizing Hormone and Body Mass Index in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: Investigation of Hypothalamic and Pituitary Contributions J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1309 - 1316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Mehta, K. S. Patel, M. S. Coffler, M. H. Dahan, R. Y. Yoo, J. S. Archer, P. J. Malcom, and R. J. Chang Luteinizing Hormone Secretion Is Not Influenced by Insulin Infusion in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Despite Improved Insulin Sensitivity during Pioglitazone Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2136 - 2141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |