| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, GKT School of Medicine, St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom SE1 7EH
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. James Gibney, Department of Endocrinology, St. Vincents Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. E-mail: j.gibney{at}st-vincents.ie.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GHD adults have reduced rates of protein synthesis and protein breakdown, but normal rates of irreversible oxidative protein loss (5). These changes are reflected by a reduction in lean body mass (LBM). Replacement of r-hGH in such subjects results in increased protein synthesis, reduced oxidative protein loss, and increased LBM (6). Previous studies investigating the influence of r-hGH on whole body protein turnover in highly trained, GH-replete subjects, however, have reported conflicting findings (7, 8).
Exercise exerts a significant influence on protein metabolism (9). Whole body and muscle protein breakdown increase during exercise, whereas oxidation of certain amino acids, including leucine, increases during exercise. It is therefore apparent that studies of protein metabolism in the resting state may fail to recognize important changes occurring during or after exercise.
The aim of this study was to determine what changes occur in the components of whole body protein kinetics at rest and during and after exercise after the administration of high doses of r-hGH to endurance-trained adult males. The dose of r-hGH administered was chosen based on anecdotal reports of doses self-administered by athletes (10).
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data presented here are from a 4-wk, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the administration of r-hGH to endurance-trained adult males. Subjects attended for four visits. After screening (visit 1), three studies were performed to assess the effects of r-hGH administration on protein turnover at rest and during and after exercise. After the baseline study (visit 2), subjects were randomized to receive either r-hGH or an identical placebo at a dose of 0.067 mg/kg body weight daily. r-hGH was self-administered as a nocturnal sc injection. The placebo vials contained the same vehicle as the r-hGH. Subjects were then studied at 1 (visit 3) and 4 (visit 4) wk after randomization to GH administration or commencement of placebo.
Subjects
Eleven male volunteers were recruited and gave informed written consent to take part in the study, which was approved by the ethics committee of West Lambeth Health Authority.
Selection criteria included male gender; age between 1840 yr; high level of habitual aerobic activity, defined as at least four 30-min sessions of continuous aerobic-type exercise per week; high aerobic fitness, defined as maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) above 45 ml/kg·min; no current participation in competition at a national or international level; and no illness or medications known to impair exercise or alter endocrine function. Subjects were asked not to change their dietary habits or training programs during the study. On entry into the study and after 4 wk of treatment with GH or placebo, subjects underwent a full medical history, physical examination, and routine laboratory studies (full blood count, urea and electrolytes, creatinine, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, glucose, calcium, phosphorus, hepatic enzymes, lipid profile, and urinalysis).
Clinical protocol
All subjects underwent measurements of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and whole body protein turnover using 1-[13C]leucine tracer. Total body fat and LBM were measured DEXA, which was performed using a whole body scanner (QDR-2000, Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA). DEXA can be used to estimate fat in specific anatomical regions, and in this study an abdominal region (trunk) was defined to assess abdominal fat mass [coefficient of variation (CV), <2% for all measurements].
On each study day, subjects were fasted overnight. The study was performed between 09001600 h. A cannula (Venflon, Helsingborg, Sweden) was inserted into the antecubital fossa of one arm for isotope infusion and the contralateral dorsal hand vein, which was heated, for arterialized blood sampling (11). Subjects were rested in bed in a semirecumbent position, and blood and breath samples were taken to measure basal enrichment of plasma
-ketoisocaproate (
-KIC) and expired CO2. A bolus dose of NaH13CO3 (0.2 mg/kg) was given iv to prime the bicarbonate pool, and a primed constant infusion (1 mg/kg; 1 mg/kg·h) of 1-[13C]leucine was then infused for 300 min. The rate of infusion was doubled at the beginning of exercise to minimize the exercise-induced reductions in KIC and CO2 enrichment (12). After a 160-min equilibration period to reach steady state tracer enrichment, the basal steady state was sampled (-20 to 0 min). Blood samples were taken at the end of 30 min of exercise and 30, 60, and 90 min after completion of exercise.
Exercise testing
Exercise testing was performed using an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (Lode Excalibur Sport, Groningen, Holland) and a CPX-D Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing System (Medical Graphics, Birmingham, UK). Expired gas was sampled continuously at the mouth. The concentration of dried gas was measured with analyzers accurate to ±1% [zirconia oxide O2 analyzer (response time, <80 msec) and infrared CO2 analyzer (response time, <130 msec)]. Gas volume was measured with a bidirectional differential pressure prevent pneumotach (accuracy, ±3%).
Screening exercise test
For screening purposes, VO2max was assessed. Subjects cycled to exhaustion with a starting workload of 1.5 watts/kg body weight using a smooth ramp of 25 watts/min at a cycling cadence of 80 rpm with feet strapped to the pedals. Workload at VO2max was used to calculate the submaximal protocol for the main studies. The workload at which the oxygen uptake first reached a plateau was regarded as the workload at VO2max.
Submaximal exercise protocol
All subsequent submaximal exercise tests used an identical protocol, consisting of three consecutive stages: stage 1 was 5 min at 1 watts/kg, stage 2 was 5 min at 2 watts/kg, and stage 3 was 20 min at 65% of VO2max.
Analytic methods
Plasma IGF-I was measured by RIA after an ethanol-hydrochloric acid extraction (within-assay CV, 7%) (13). Serum free T4 (fT4) and free T3 (fT3) were measured by RIA (CV, <2%). Insulin was measured by double-antibody RIA (within-assay CV, 6%). Insulin resistance was estimated in each subject using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMAIR) with the following validated formula: fasting serum insulin (µU/ml) x fasting plasma glucose (mmol/liter)/22.5. Plasma cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by an enzymatic method with a colorimetric end point with a Cobas Fara II centrifugal analyzer (Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK; within-assay CV, <5%). High density lipoprotein cholesterol was measured enzymatically (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) after precipitating the apolipoprotein B- containing particles with dextran sulfate/magnesium chloride (within-assay CV, <5%). Low density lipoprotein cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula.
Plasma
-KIC enrichment was measured as the quinoxalinol (tert-butyldimethylsilyl) derivative by selected ion monitoring of fragments at m/z 259 and 260 using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (5971A MSD, Hewlett-Packard, Bracknell, UK). The analytical precision of the method (CV) has been shown to be less than 8% for isotopic enrichment of
-KIC (6). The plasma
-KIC concentration was calculated using an internal standard of d5
KIC.
13C enrichment of breath CO2 was measured on an SIRA series II isotope ratio mass spectrometer (VG Isotech, Cheshire, UK).
Calculation of whole body protein turnover
The assumptions and validity of the whole body leucine turnover technique during exercise have previously been discussed in detail (12). The rate of leucine appearance (Ra) was calculated with the use of the one-compartment model originally proposed by Steele (14), which has been validated for the measurement of leucine metabolism and modified for stable isotopes (15). In this model,
-KIC was used as a measure of intracellular leucine enrichment (16). The calculations have been previously described in detail (17). Leucine oxidation during exercise was calculated as previously described by Wolfe et al. (12) and was corrected, assuming 80% of 13CO2 at rest and 97% during exercise was expired (18). It has previously been demonstrated that GH administration does not alter the bicarbonate retention factor (19).
Statistical analyses
Results are expressed as the mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, with repeated measures where appropriate. P < 0.05 was taken as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Serum fT3, fT4, and TSH all remained unchanged in the placebo-treated subjects throughout the study period. During r-hGH administration, there was an increase in mean fT3, and a decrease in mean fT4 (P < 0.05; Table 2
). fT3 levels for all subjects reached supraphysiological levels compared with laboratory reference ranges. These changes were detectable by d 7 of treatment with r-hGH and did not change further over the remaining 21-d period of r-hGH administration (Table 2
).
There was no change at any time point in fasting plasma glucose or insulin or in HOMAIR in the placebo-treated subjects. Fasting plasma glucose did not change significantly in the r-hGH-treated group, but there were increases in fasting insulin and HOMAIR after 1 and 4 wk of GH administration (P < 0.05; Table 2
). There was no change in plasma lipid profile in either group.
Body weight, LBM, total body fat, and trunk fat remained stable in the placebo group for the duration of the study. Total body fat and trunk fat did not change significantly in the r-hGH-treated group. In contrast, body weight and LBM increased in the r-hGH-treated group (P < 0.05; Table 2
).
Leucine turnover at rest
Steady state enrichment values are shown in Table 3
. After 1 wk of GH treatment, leucine Ra and nonoxidative leucine disposal (NOLD) increased, whereas leucine oxidation decreased (P < 0.01; Fig. 1
). After 4 wk of GH treatment, there was a further significant increase in leucine Ra and NOLD and a further significant reduction in leucine oxidation (P < 0.05; Fig. 1
). None of these variables changed at any timepoint in the placebo-treated group.
|
|
In the baseline studies, leucine oxidation increased during exercise (P < 0.01) and decreased during recovery (Fig. 2
). Leucine Ra and NOLD increased during exercise and remained elevated during recovery (P < 0.01; Fig. 2
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Under steady state conditions, the Ra of leucine in the circulation, which provides an index of protein breakdown, is balanced by the sum of the rates of leucine oxidation and NOLD, which provides an index of protein synthesis. In this study we observed an increase in protein breakdown, but also a shift in partitioning between leucine oxidation and protein synthesis in favor of protein synthesis. The overall effect, therefore, was an increase in protein turnover, but an absolute reduction in oxidative leucine loss, highly suggestive of an overall anabolic effect. These metabolic effects were accompanied by a mean increase of 3.4 kg LBM, estimated by DEXA scanning. It is probable that some of this increase reflects changes in total body water secondary to the antinatriuretic effect of GH (20), but in the context of increased protein synthesis and reduced oxidative protein loss, it is likely that it also reflects whole body protein accretion.
There have been conflicting reports of the effects of GH administration on leucine kinetics. Observations vary between studies of athletic and nonathletic subjects, and between those of whole body protein turnover and muscle protein synthesis. Horber and Haymond (19) demonstrated no change in whole body protein breakdown, but an increase in protein synthesis, after the administration of 0.1 mg/kg·d r-hGH to untrained males for 1 wk. Using a lower dose (0.04 mg/kg·d), Yaresheski et al. (7) observed an increase in whole body, but not muscle, protein synthesis in untrained men after 12-wk administration of r-hGH. However, the same group observed no change in whole body protein synthesis after 14-d administration of the same dose to experienced weight lifters (8). In contrast, Fryburg et al. (21) demonstrated that infusion of GH for 8 h to untrained males resulted in increased muscle, but not whole body, protein synthesis. The observation that whole body protein synthesis did not change in the studies by Fryburg et al. (21) may reflect a difference between acute and more long-term effects of GH. Notably, the effects of GH on carbohydrate metabolism are known to differ markedly depending on the duration of exposure to GH (22). The observations by Yarasheski et al. (7) that GH increased whole body protein synthesis in normal subjects, but not in weightlifters, might represent a differential response in resistance-trained subjects. Muscle that is already hypertrophied may have less potential to further increase. It is unlikely that the differences between those studies reflect a different period of administration, as measurable effects were clearly demonstrated after 1 wk in both our study and that by Horber and Haymond (19).
As previously observed (9, 23, 24, 25), leucine oxidation increased more than 2-fold during exercise. The rate-limiting step for the oxidation of branched chain amino acids, including leucine, is decarboxylation (26), which is catalyzed by the mitochondrial branched chain 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complex (BCOADH). More than 50% of the bodys BCOADH is located within skeletal muscle (27), where its percent activation increases with exercise (24, 28). Thus, it is likely that the observed increase in leucine oxidation during exercise largely reflects changes in skeletal muscle. Administration of r-hGH reduced leucine oxidation by more than 50%, which is suggestive that at least during exercise, the metabolic effects of GH include an anabolic effect in skeletal muscle. This is compatible with in vitro studies of GH action and with the observation that replacement with r-hGH increases thigh muscle mass in GHD adults (29).
Although this study provides evidence that GH increases body protein, it is clear from the pathophysiological model of acromegaly that sustained high levels of GH do not lead to any improvement in strength or endurance. In contrast, acromegaly is characterized by abnormal protein remodeling not only in skeletal muscle, but in most organ systems, resulting in tissue disorganization and functional impairment. Despite an increase in muscle mass, physical strength is reduced rather than increased, and histological examination of muscle fibers reveals a myopathic process (30). Whether the increase in protein breakdown, observed in the current study, plays any role in these effects is unknown, but warrants investigation.
Although both GH (31) and IGF-I (32, 33) exert direct anabolic effects, it is possible that some of the observed effects may result from the influence of GH and IGF-I on other endocrine pathways. Fasting insulin and insulin resistance estimated using the HOMA model increased after GH administration. Insulin exerts a powerful antiproteolytic effect (34), and it is possible that resistance to this effect may have contributed to the observed increase in proteolysis. Increased proteolysis may also have resulted from increased fT3 (35), consistent with the effect of GH to enhance the extrathyroidal conversion of T4 to T3 (36). Finally, increases in alternative energy substrates, such as fatty acids, ketone bodies, and pyruvate, inhibit flux through the BCOADH complex and therefore might contribute to reduced leucine oxidation (37, 38).
In summary, these findings demonstrate that short-term administration of supraphysiological GH exerts an anabolic effect at rest and during exercise, supporting the theoretical possibility that acute GH excess may have short-term benefits for physical performance. The effect of GH to conserve protein during exercise has potential therapeutic implications that merit exploration.
| Footnotes |
|---|
-KIC,
-ketoisocaproate; LBM, lean body mass; NOLD, nonoxidative leucine disposal; Ra, rate of appearance; r-GH, recombinant human GH; VO2max, maximal oxygen uptake. Received November 27, 2002.
Accepted July 25, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ketoisocaproate during a L-[1-13C]leucine infusion in man: a method for measuring human intracellular leucine tracer enrichment. Metabolism 31:11051112[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Moller and J. O. L. Jorgensen Effects of Growth Hormone on Glucose, Lipid, and Protein Metabolism in Human Subjects Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2009; 30(2): 152 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Young and A. Anwar Strong diabetes BMJ Case Reports, February 2, 2009; 2009(jan27_1): bcr0820080708 - bcr0820080708. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Giannoulis, N. Jackson, F. Shojaee-Moradie, K. S. Nair, P. H. Sonksen, F. C. Martin, and A. M. Umpleby The Effects of Growth Hormone and/or Testosterone on Whole Body Protein Kinetics and Skeletal Muscle Gene Expression in Healthy Elderly Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 3066 - 3074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Liu, D. M. Bravata, I. Olkin, A. Friedlander, V. Liu, B. Roberts, E. Bendavid, O. Saynina, S. R. Salpeter, A. M. Garber, et al. Systematic Review: The Effects of Growth Hormone on Athletic Performance Ann Intern Med, May 20, 2008; 148(10): 747 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. R. Short, N. Moller, M. L. Bigelow, J. Coenen-Schimke, and K. S. Nair Enhancement of Muscle Mitochondrial Function by Growth Hormone J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 597 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gibney, M.-L. Healy, and P. H. Sonksen The Growth Hormone/Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Axis in Exercise and Sport Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2007; 28(6): 603 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Young, A. Anwar, and C. Milne Strong diabetes * COMMENTARY Br. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 41(5): 335 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gibney, T. Wolthers, M. G. Burt, K.-C. Leung, A. M. Umpleby, and K. K. Y. Ho Protein Metabolism in Acromegaly: Differential Effects of Short- and Long-Term Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 1479 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Pierce, B. C. Clark, L. L. Ploutz-Snyder, and J. A. Kanaley Growth hormone and muscle function responses to skeletal muscle ischemia J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1588 - 1595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Healy, J. Gibney, C. Pentecost, P. Croos, D. L. Russell-Jones, P. H. Sonksen, and A. M. Umpleby Effects of High-Dose Growth Hormone on Glucose and Glycerol Metabolism at Rest and during Exercise in Endurance-Trained Athletes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 320 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. McHugh, R. T. Park, P. H. Sonksen, and R. I.G. Holt Challenges in Detecting the Abuse of Growth Hormone in Sport Clin. Chem., September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1587 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gibney, T. Wolthers, G. Johannsson, A. M. Umpleby, and K. K. Y. Ho Growth hormone and testosterone interact positively to enhance protein and energy metabolism in hypopituitary men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2005; 289(2): E266 - E271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Berggren, C. Ehrnborg, T. Rosen, L. Ellegard, B.-A. Bengtsson, and K. Caidahl Short-Term Administration of Supraphysiological Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (GH) Does Not Increase Maximum Endurance Exercise Capacity in Healthy, Active Young Men and Women with Normal GH-Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Axes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3268 - 3273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |