help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sklar, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sklar, C. A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 10 4731-4739
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society

Final Height and Body Mass Index among Adult Survivors of Childhood Brain Cancer: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

James G. Gurney, Kirsten K. Ness, Marilyn Stovall, Suzanne Wolden, Judy A. Punyko, Joseph P. Neglia, Ann C. Mertens, Roger J. Packer, Leslie L. Robison and Charles A. Sklar

Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota (J.G.G., K.K.N., J.A.P., J.P.N., A.C.M., L.L.R.), Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (M.S.), Houston, Texas 77030; Departments of Radiation Oncology (S.W.) and Pediatrics (C.A.S.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021; and Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Children’s National Medical Center, George Washington University (R.J.P.), Washington, D.C. 20010

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Charles A. Sklar, M.D., Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021. E-mail: sklarc{at}mskcc.org.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The objectives of this study were 1) to compare final height and body mass index (BMI) between adult survivors of childhood brain cancer and age- and sex-matched population norms, 2) to quantify the effects of treatment- and cancer-related factors on the risk of final height below the 10th percentile (adult short stature) or having a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or more (obesity). Treatment records were abstracted and surveys completed by 921 adults aged 20–45 yr who were treated for brain cancer as children and were participants in the multicenter Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Nearly 40% of childhood brain cancer survivors were below the 10th percentile for height. The strongest risk factors for adult short stature were young age at diagnosis and radiation treatment involving the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA). The multivariate odds ratio for adult short stature among those 4 yr of age or younger at diagnosis, relative to ages 10–20 yr, was 5.67 (95% confidence interval, 3.6–8.9). HPA radiation exposure increased the risk of adult short stature in a dose-response fashion (trend test, P < 0.0001). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not an independent risk factor for adult short stature. BMI distribution in survivors did not differ appreciably from that of population norms; however, in females, young age at diagnosis and HPA radiation dose (trend test, P < 0.001) were associated with risk of obesity. Except for patients treated with surgery only, survivors of childhood brain cancer are at very high risk for adult short stature, and this risk increases with radiation dose involving the HPA. We did not find a corresponding elevated risk for obesity.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BRAIN CANCERS ARE the most common solid neoplasms that occur in children (1). Survival after a diagnosis of a malignant brain tumor in childhood has improved substantially in the United States over the last several decades. Population-based data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Ends Results Program show the 5-yr relative survival probability for all brain malignancies combined to be approximately 69% for children diagnosed in 1992 or later (2), although clinical course differs greatly depending on age at diagnosis, tumor site within the brain, and morphological and biological tumor characteristics (3). As reviewed previously (4), survivors of childhood brain cancer are at high risk for a variety of adverse medical, neurocognitive, and psychosocial late effects. Endocrine disorders are prominent among the spectrum of long-term conditions that may afflict brain cancer survivors (5). Many case series have reported on the deleterious effect of treatment for brain cancer on growth patterns in children, but such studies usually were limited by small numbers and highly selective samples (4). In this report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), we present results from a comparative analysis of 921 young adult survivors of a childhood brain cancer evaluating final height and body mass index (BMI) to that of same age, same sex population norms in relation to age at diagnosis, histological subtype, GH replacement therapy, and cancer treatment received.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CCSS

As previously described (6), CCSS is an ongoing, multicenter, epidemiological, follow-up study of adult survivors of childhood cancer. Inclusion criteria for CCSS were limited to individuals who received their primary treatment at one of 25 collaborating institutions (Table 1Go) and who survived at least 5 yr after diagnosis of their malignant disease. CCSS eligibility was restricted to those with a primary brain cancer, leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, kidney tumor, neuroblastoma, soft tissue sarcoma, or malignant bone tumor, which was diagnosed between 1970 and 1986 at age 20 yr or younger. Children diagnosed with nonmalignant brain neoplasms, such as craniopharyngiomas, were not eligible for inclusion in CCSS, and thus are not represented in this analysis. The human subjects research review committees at University of Minnesota (the study coordinating center) and each collaborating institution approved CCSS protocols and documents. Each eligible participant or his or her proxy if younger than age 18 yr at interview or if they died after achieving 5-yr survivorship but before being interviewed, provided informed consent for the study and separate consent to allow release and abstraction of medical records, including treatment records. Among the 20,276 5-yr survivors (cases) identified by the collaborating institutions, at the time of this analysis 14,054 were enrolled and completed an interview, 3,132 declined to participate, 2,996 were lost to follow-up and never offered enrollment, and 94 were pending completion of data collection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. CCSS institutions and investigators

 
Treatment records were obtained for 1607 (88%) of the 1818 participating cases with a primary brain cancer, and this analysis was restricted to the 921 brain cancer survivors with treatment information who were 20 yr or older (to assure final height) and still living at the time of interview.

Data collection

As part of a baseline survey questionnaire covering a wide range of information on demographic characteristics, health habits, and medical conditions, each participant was asked to report on his or her current height and weight. A copy of the survey instrument is available for review and downloading at www.cancer.umn.edu/ccss. Baseline interviews, completed by mailed questionnaire or in some cases by telephone with a trained interviewer, were conducted primarily in 1995 and 1996. Accordingly, self-reported age- and sex-specific population norms for height, weight, and BMI were derived from the 1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). NHIS is conducted annually by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (7). The 1995 NHIS included interviews with 102,467 persons, including 35,331 who were aged 20–45 yr (8), to correspond with the age range at interview of the CCSS cases included in this analysis.

Radiation dosimetry

Radiation dose was quantified by a radiation physicist who evaluated diagrams and photographs taken in the treatment position to determine maximum total brain dose and brain regions exposed. If diagrams were not available, a written description from the medical record was used to estimate the regions included and the dose administered. Radiation exposure assessment included partitioning the brain into four anatomical segments: frontal cortex, posterior fossa, parietal/occipital cortex, and temporal lobe, which includes exposure to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA). A region was considered to be in a primary radiation field if at least 50% of the segment was included in the radiation volume; otherwise, the segment was considered to have received scatter dose.

Chemotherapy

Seven broad drug classes of adjuvant chemotherapy were identified from treatment records: alkylating agents, alkaloids, platinum-containing agents, antimetabolites, topoisomerase inhibitors, antibiotics, and steroids. The combinations of drugs received were so heterogeneous that no particular agent or combination of agents could be isolated sufficiently to quantify independent risk with confidence. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy was incorporated into the treatment group classifications as a yes/no factor. Each person who was treated with chemotherapy also received surgery and cranial radiation.

GH replacement therapy (GHRT)

A previous study was conducted to verify GHRT among CCSS study participants who reported a postdiagnosis history of GH deficiency or GH treatment (9). Among the 921 brain cancer cases eligible for this analysis, 63 had confirmed GHRT, and 27 others reported receiving GHRT, but records were not available to verify the information. In contrast to those who did not receive GHRT, the 27 unverified GHRT cases closely resembled the characteristics of the 63 confirmed GHRT cases. For example, 47.6% with verified GHRT and 48.2% with unverified GHRT had a primitive neuroectodermal tumor vs. 17.0% of those without GHRT. Additionally, 74.6% with verified GHRT and 77.8% with unverified GHRT fell within our definition of adult short stature vs. 35.7% without GHRT. As such, the 27 unverified GHRT cases were combined with the 63 verified cases in the analysis of GHRT effects.

Data analysis

Outcome variables. Age- and sex-specific height and BMI percentile classifications were calculated for each brain cancer case, based on the population norms obtained from the 1995 NHIS. BMI was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. For multivariate analyses, adult short stature was defined as a height below the 10th percentile, and a BMI value of 30 or higher was used to define obesity.

Cancer-related variables. Tumor histology was categorized into four groups: 1) astrocytoma and glioma (astroglial), 2) medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), 3) ependymoma, and 4) other tumor type. Cancer treatment was categorized into seven groups: 1) surgery only; 2) surgery and cranial radiation; 3) surgery and craniospinal radiation; 4) surgery, cranial radiation, and chemotherapy; 5) surgery, craniospinal radiation, and chemotherapy; 6) surgery with radiation exposure that could not be characterized; and 7) other therapy. HPA exposure was categorized into six groups: 1) no cranial radiation, 2) less than 20 Gy, 3) 20–39 Gy, 4) 40–59 Gy, 5) 60 Gy or more, and 6) uncertain dose. The uncertain dose group included 90 cases who received radiotherapy but whose records were insufficient to reliably characterize HPA dose. Age at diagnosis was categorized into three groups: 1) 4 yr or younger, 2) 5–9 yr, and 3) 10–20 yr.

Multivariate analyses.

For each of the dichotomous outcome variables of adult short stature and obesity, logistic regression analyses were conducted to simultaneously account for the effects of treatment group, tumor histology, age at diagnosis, and GHRT. Because the height percentiles were matched for age at interview and sex, these variables were not explicitly included in those models. Sex and age at interview were included in the models that evaluated obesity. The other therapy, other tumor type, and uncertain dose groups were included in the models as indicator (dummy) variables, but the heterogeneity within each group precludes drawing meaningful conclusions from the results, so their values were not shown in the outcome tables. The uncertain dose was not included in the Mantel-Haenszel {chi}2 test for trend to evaluate HPA dose response.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subject characteristics

The mean age at interview for the 921 study participants was 27.2 yr (median, 27.0), with a range of 20–45 yr; little difference in mean age was observed between males (27.3 yr) and females (27.1 yr). Mean height was 1.69 m (SD = 0.12) for males and 1.58 m (SD = 0.11) for females. Both males and females were shorter, on the average, than would be expected from NHIS data. Comparable age mean height from NHIS was 1.79 m for males (P < 0.001) and 1.65 m for females (P < 0.001). Four (0.8%) males and three (0.7%) females had heights shorter than -4 SD, five (1.0%) males and 11 (2.5%) females had heights between -3 and -4 SD, and 65 (13.3%) males and 32 females (7.4%) had heights between -2 and -3 SD compared with same sex population norms from NHIS. Other characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 2Go. The age distribution at diagnosis was similar for males and females, with approximately 45% of cases younger than age 10 yr when diagnosed. Astroglial tumors (68%) predominated in the case group, and PNETs accounted for an additional 20% of diagnoses. About 28% of cases were treated with surgery only for their brain cancer, and all but four other cases received radiation. Most cases with HPA exposure received between 40 and 59 Gy. Although not shown in Table 2Go, the maximum brain radiation dose to any part of the brain among the 656 cases who received radiation therapy was: less than 40 Gy, 6%; 40–49 Gy, 15%; 50–54 Gy, 44%; 55 Gy or more, 22%; and uncertain dose, 13%. More males (11.6%) than females (7.7%) received GHRT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Characteristics of the study participants

 
Also shown in Table 2Go are the number and percentage of surviving brain cancer cases by outcome status. Nearly 40% of cases were classified as adult short stature. Males were more likely than females to have adult short stature, but females had a higher likelihood of obesity than males. The female proportion of cases with obesity (17.4%) did not differ statistically from that of same age females in the NHIS sample (18.7%; P = 0.51). However, a lower proportion of males in the case group were obese (12.9%) compared with same age males in NHIS (17.9%; P = 0.004).

Height and BMI distributions

Figure 1Go provides panels of the distributions of height and BMI, stratified, respectively, by age at diagnosis and treatment modality, compared with same age- and same sex-expected values from NHIS. In each evaluation a large excess of brain cancer cases are below the 5th or 10th percentiles for height, but the distributions for BMI among cases are quite similar to normative values. For instance, 53% of adults who were diagnosed before age 5 yr, 46% of those diagnosed from ages 5–9 yr, and 26% of those diagnosed from ages 10–20 yr, were below the 10th percentile for final height (top panel). Treatment group effects are shown in the lower panel, where the height and BMI distributions for those treated with surgery only are only minimally different from what would be expected for population norms. In contrast, a large proportion of adults treated with radiation, particularly craniospinal radiation, are below the 5th or 10th percentiles of height. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not appreciably alter these distributions, so to enhance visual clarity we did not account separately for chemotherapy in the figure.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Age- and sex-specific percentiles for height and BMI comparing normative data from the 1995 NHIS to the distribution among surviving brain cancer study participants by age at diagnosis (upper panel) and by treatment modality (lower panel).

 
Adult short stature risk profile

The multivariate model quantifying the relative odds of being below the 10th percentile for height, compared with the 10th percentile or higher, is shown in Table 3Go. This evaluation considers simultaneously the effects of age at diagnosis, tumor histology, treatment group (without accounting for radiation dose), and GHRT. The strongest risk factors for adult short stature were young age at diagnosis and craniospinal irradiation. PNET histology and GHRT were also independent risk factors for adult short stature. After accounting for treatment, histology, and GHRT, adult short stature was 5-fold higher in those diagnosed before age 5 yr and 3-fold higher in those diagnosed from age 5–9 yr compared with those diagnosed at age 10–19 yr. The age effect appears to be considerably stronger among females than males.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Multivariate regression analysis of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for effects of treatment modality and other factors on being below the 10th percentile for height, or for having a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or more

 
Table 4Go shows results of the HPA radiation dose evaluation while accounting for the same treatment- and cancer-related characteristics. The relative odds for adult short stature are substantially increased from HPA radiation exposure in a dose-response pattern (test for trend, P < 0.0001). Independent of the effects of age at diagnosis, tumor histology, GHRT, adjuvant chemotherapy, and spinal irradiation, HPA exposure of 20–39 or 40–59 Gy was associated with a 3-fold increased risk for adult short stature, and exposure of 60 Gy or more was associated with a 5-fold increased risk compared with brain cancer survivors who did not receive cranial radiation therapy. Neither adjuvant chemotherapy nor spinal irradiation appeared to be an independent risk factor for adult short stature once HPA radiation dose was taken into account.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Multivariate regression analysis of odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for effects of radiation dose and other factors on being below the lowest 10th percentile for height or for having a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or more

 
Obesity risk profile

As shown in Table 3Go, younger age at diagnosis and cranial radiation are the only apparent risk factors for obesity, and only in females. The risk for obesity among females, after controlling for the other factors in the model, was 2.7-fold higher for those with age at diagnosis of 4 yr or younger and 3.6-fold higher for those diagnosed at 5–9 yr compared with those diagnosed at older ages. Cranial irradiation among females, regardless of concurrent treatments, increased the risk of obesity 2- to 3-fold above that of treatment with surgery only. No similar effects were seen among the male cases. There did appear to be a dose-response relation between HPA radiation dose and obesity among females (test for trend, P < 0.001), but not among males (test for trend, P = 0.32; Table 4Go).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this large epidemiological study of young adults who survived primary brain cancer as a child, we found that a remarkably high proportion, nearly 40%, were very short of stature. These findings are similar to smaller studies of brain cancer survivors in both mean values of final adult height (10) and in lower percentiles of height compared with the normal population (11, 12). We acknowledge that self- reported height and weight are not the gold standard measurements, and that some misclassification undoubtedly is present in these data. Because there is evidence to indicate that males typically overreport their height by 2 in. (5.08 cm) (13), we conducted a sensitivity analysis to estimate the prevalence bounds of short stature among males in our study population. The prevalence of short stature in our study population could range from 22% if the misclassification only occurred in the male NHIS comparisons to 51% if the misclassification occurred only among our brain cancer survivor cases. However, because the population norms we used from NHIS data were also based on self-report, we believe that any errors in height and weight are not likely to systematically differ between the two reporting sources.

Because of the high correlations between age at diagnosis, histological subtype, and treatment modality, it is often difficult to disentangle the independent effects of each individual factor on brain cancer late effects. Our multivariate models provide evidence that the most important single factors predicting adult short stature are young age at diagnosis and radiation exposure to the HPA. Helseth et al. (10) also reported a correlation between young age at the time of treatment and short final height. Evidence of the association between radiation treatment and impaired growth velocity or short final height has been reported in other studies of brain cancer patients (14, 15, 16, 17) and in follow-up studies that examined other types of cancer (9, 18, 19). Children who undergo cranial radiation treatment for brain cancer are at increased risk for short stature, GH deficiency, and for other endocrine abnormalities that were not examined in this analysis, such as precocious puberty, hypogonadism, and hypothyroidism (5, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25).

At least two mechanisms exist for growth impairment from high dose craniospinal radiation: GH deficiency from the effects on the HPA (26), and direct arrest of vertebral body growth from radiation to the spine (27). A recent clinical study of 25 children treated with cranial radiation for a brain tumor showed that GH levels declined over a 12-month period after treatment, and that the level of GH deficiency was dependent on hypothalamic radiation dose and volume (28). The effect on GH levels was dose dependent and was consistent with the HPA dose effects on final height that we observed in our study. Other studies also have shown radiation doses in the range of 40–60 Gy to be associated with a significant risk of GH deficiency (27, 28, 29). Children may benefit from GH replacement therapy for correction of this element of their growth impairment (11, 30); however, in our study treatment with GH did not eliminate the risk for adult short stature. In fact, after accounting for HPA radiation dose and other relevant factors, the male participants who received GHRT had a 3-fold higher likelihood of adult short stature than the male participants not so treated. We were unable to evaluate the etiology of this seemingly paradoxical finding, but it is likely that the patients treated with GHRT reflect those with the most severe growth retardation. Although GHRT was not entirely successful in normalizing their final height, GHRT is reported to be both safe (9, 31, 32) and effective in improving growth velocity (33) in children with radiation-induced GH deficiency. Unfortunately, GH replacement cannot correct the direct bone damage that occurs from radiation exposure to the spine (30, 34). Irradiation of the growing spine may compromise final height by impairing growth of the vertebrae. We found that study participants who received craniospinal irradiation were at higher risk of adult short stature than participants treated with cranial radiation not involving the spine; however, the enhanced effect was weak and not statistically significant once HPA dose was taken into account.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been reported to be associated with risk of short final height (35, 36) and appeared to impart risk above that of cranial radiation in our study for adult short stature. However, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with risk for short stature once HPA radiation dose was taken into account in the analysis.

A novel finding in this study is that although there was a high propensity for brain cancer survivors to be below the 10th percentile in height, cases tended to be proportional in height to weight. This observation contrasts with several previous small studies of brain cancer survivors (33, 37), and with one large study of acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors treated with lower doses of cranial radiation, who were at high risk for both short stature and significant obesity (38). The risk of severe obesity in patients surviving craniopharyngiomas is well established, but could not be assessed in our study because these patients were not eligible for inclusion. The overall distribution of BMI among participating survivors in our study was similar to that of same age, same sex population norms. The number of obese patients was significantly lower than that of population norms in males and was similar to population norms in females. Among females, but not males, the risk of obesity was increased by HPA radiation exposure in a dose-response fashion and by age at diagnosis of younger than 10 yr. In a retrospective analysis of 156 children who survived a brain tumor for at least 5 yr after therapy, Lustig et al. (39) identified hypothalamic damage from any source of treatment, but particularly from radiation doses of 51 Gy or higher, as the primary risk factor for obesity.

This follow-up study of a large and diverse clinical population confirms and illustrates an important long-term effect of brain cancer and its treatment among those fortunate enough to survive into adulthood, that of substantial short stature. As cure rates for childhood brain tumors continue to improve, so must our understanding of the impairments related to the disease and the consequences of the necessary treatment interventions. Clinical and epidemiological research in the area of cancer survivorship and late effects (40, 41), although difficult to conduct because of feasibility challenges with follow-up, must continue to focus on long-term medical outcomes and how they influence the future physical and psychosocial health of the affected children and their families (42).


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant U24-CA-55727 and the Children’s Cancer Research Fund at University of Minnesota.

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CCSS, Childhood Cancer Survivor Study; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; GHRT, GH replacement therapy; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary axis; NHIS, National Health Interview Survey; OR, odds ratio; PNET, primitive neuroectodermal tumor/medulloblastoma; SDS, SD score.

Received May 1, 2003.

Accepted July 14, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Gurney JG, Davis S, Severson RK, Fang JY, Ross JA, Robison LL 1996 Trends in cancer incidence among children in the U.S. Cancer 78:532–541[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Mariotto A, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK 2003 SEER Cancer statistics review, 1975–2000. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/ (accessed on April 24, 2003)
  3. Strother DR, Pollack IF, Fisher PG Hunter JV, Woo SY, Pomeroy SL, Rorke LB 2002 Tumors of the central nervous system. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and practice of pediatric oncology, 4th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 751–824
  4. Anderson DM, Rennie KM, Ziegler RS, Neglia JP, Robison LR, Gurney JG 2001 Medical and neurocognitive late effects among survivors of childhood central nervous system tumors. Cancer 92:2709–2719[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gurney JG, Kadan-Lottick NS, Packer RJ, Neglia JP, Sklar CA, Punyko JA, Stovall M, Yasui Y, Nicholson HS, Wolden S, McNeil E, Mertens AC, Robison LL 2003 Endocrine and cardiovascular late effects among adult survivors of childhood brain tumors: Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer 97:663–673[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD, Breslow NE, Donaldson SS, Green DM, Li FP, Meadows AT, Mulvihill JJ, Neglia JP, Nesbit ME, Packer RJ, Potter JD, Sklar CA, Smith MA, Stovall M, Strong LC, Yasui Y, Zeltzer LK 2002 Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Pediatr Oncol 38:229–239[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Botman S, Moore T, Moiarity CL, Parsons VL 2003 Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995–2004. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics 2(130). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_130.pdf (accessed on March 3, 2003)
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1999 National Health Interview Survey (CD-ROM), series 10, no. 10. Hyattsville, MD: Data Dissemination Branch, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  9. Sklar CA, Mertens AC, Mitby P, Occhiogrosso G, Qin J, Heller G, Yasui Y, Robison LL 2002 Risk of disease recurrence and second neoplasms in survivors of childhood cancer treated with growth hormone: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3136–3141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Helseth E, Due-Tonnessen B, Wesenberg F, Lote K, Lundar T 1999 Posterior fossa medulloblastoma in children and young adults (0–19 years): survival and performance. Childs Nerv Syst 15:451–455[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Oberfield SE, Sklar C, Allen J, Walker R, Maenza J, Ralston S, Levine LS 1992 Growth, thyroid, and pubertal function in long-term survivors of medulloblastoma/PNET. In: Green DM, DiAngio GJ, eds. Late effects of treatment for childhood cancer. New York: Wiley-Liss; 55–62
  12. Livesey EA, Hindmarsh PC, Brook CG, Whitton AC, Bloom HJ, Tobias JS, Godlee JN, Britton J 1990 Endocrine disorders following treatment of childhood brain tumours. Br J Cancer 61:622–625[Medline]
  13. Rowland ML 1990 Self-reported height and weight. Am J Clin Nutr 52:1125–1133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Shalet SM, Beardwell CG, Aarons BM, Pearson D, Jones PH 1978 Growth impairment in children treated for brain tumours. Arch Dis Child 53:491–494[Abstract]
  15. Pasqualini T, Diez B, Domene H, Escobar ME, Gruneiro L, Heinrich JJ, Martinez A, Iorcansky S, Sackmann-Muriel F, Rivarola M 1987 Long-term endocrine sequelae after surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in children with medulloblastoma. Cancer 59:801–806[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Barr RD, Simpson T, Webber CE, Gill GJ, Hay J, Eves M, Whitton AC 1998 Osteopenia in children surviving brain tumours. Eur J Cancer 34:873–877
  17. Muirhead SE, Hsu E, Grimard L, Keene D 2002 Endocrine complications of pediatric brain tumors: case series and literature review. Pediatr Neurol 27:165–170[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Hovi L, Saarinen-Pihkala UM, Vettenranta K, Lipsanen M, Tapanainen P 1999 Growth in children with poor-risk neuroblastoma after regimens with or without total body irradiation in preparation for autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 24:1131–1136[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Alter CA, Thornton PS, Willi SM, Bunin N, Moshang T 1996 Growth in children after bone marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia as compared to acute lymphocytic leukemia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 9:51–57[Medline]
  20. Chin D, Sklar C, Donahue B, Uli N, Geneiser N, Allen J, Nirenberg A, David R, Kohn B, Oberfield SE 1997 Thyroid dysfunction as a late effect in survivors of pediatric medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors: a comparison of hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy. Cancer 80:798–804[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Oberfield SE, Soranno D, Nirenberg A, Heller G, Allen JC, David R, Levine LS, Sklar CA 1996 Age at onset of puberty following high dose central nervous system radiation therapy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 150:589–592[Abstract]
  22. Oberfield SE, Garvin JH 2000 Thalamic and hypothalamic tumors of childhood: endocrine late effects. Pediatr Neurosurg 32:264–271[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Constine LS, Woolf PD, Cann D, Mick G, McCormick K, Raubertas RF, Rubin P 1993 Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction after radiation for brain tumors. N Engl J Med 328:87–94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Livesey EA, Brook CG 1989 Thyroid dysfunction after radiotherapy and chemotherapy of brain tumours. Arch Dis Child 64:593–595[Abstract]
  25. Merchant TE, Goloubeva O, Pritchard DL, Gaber MW, Xiong X, Danish RK, Lustig RH 2002 Radiation dose-volume effects on growth hormone secretion. Radiat Oncol 52:1264–1270
  26. Spoudeas HA, Charmandari E, Brook CGD 2003 Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis integrity after cranial irradiation for childhood posterior fossa tumours. Med Pediatr Oncol 40:224–229[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Sklar CA 1997 Growth and neuroendocrine dysfunction following therapy for childhood cancer. Pediatr Clin North Am 44:489–503[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Kiltie AE, Lashford LS, Gattamaneni HR 1997 Survival and late effects in medulloblastoma patients treated with craniospinal irradiation under three years old. Med Pediatr Oncol 28:348–354[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Schmiegelow M, Lassen S, Weber L, Poulsen HS, Hertz H, Muller J 1999 Dosimetry and growth hormone deficiency following cranial irradiation of childhood brain tumors. Med Pediatr Oncol 33:564–571[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Shalet SM 1995 Growth and puberty after growth hormone treatment after irradiation for brain tumours. Arch Dis Child 73:141–146[Abstract]
  31. Swerdlow AJ, Reddingius REHHA, Spoudeas HA, Phipps K, Qiao Z, Ryder WDJ, Brada M, Hayward RD, Brook CGD, Hindmarsh PC, Shalet SM 2000 Growth hormone treatment of children with brain tumors and risk of tumor recurrence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4444–4449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Packer RJ, Boyett JM, Janss AJ, Stavrou T, Kun LE, Wisoff J, Russo C, Geyer R, Phillips P, Kieran M, Greenberg M, Goldman S, Hyder D, Heideman R, Jones-Wallace D, August GP, Smith SH, Moshang T 2000 Growth hormone replacement therapy in children with medulloblastoma: use and effect on tumor control. J Clin Oncol 19:480–487
  33. Ilveskoski I, Saarinen UM, Wiklund T, Sipila I, Makipernaa A, Perkkio M, Lanning M, Salmi TT, Pihko H 1997 Growth impairment and growth hormone therapy in children treated for malignant brain tumours. Eur J Pediatr 156:764–769[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Adan L, Sainte-Rose C, Souberbielle JC, Zucker JM, Kalifa C, Brauner R 1997 Adult height after growth hormone (GH) treatment for GH deficiency due to cranial irradiation. Med Pediatr Oncol 34:14–19[CrossRef]
  35. Shalet SM, Clayton PE, Price DA 1988 Growth impairment following treatment for childhood brain tumours. Acta Paediatr Scand 343(Suppl):137–145
  36. Shalet SM, Clayton PE, Price DA 1988 Growth and pituitary function in children treated for brain tumours or acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Horm Res 30:53–61[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Heikens J, Ubbink MC, van der Pal HP, Bakker PJ, Fliers E, Smilde TJ, Kastelein JJ, Trip MD 2000 Long term survivors of childhood brain cancer have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Cancer 88:2116–2121[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Sklar CA, Mertens AC, Walter A, Mitchell D, Nesbit ME, O’Leary M, Hutchinson R, Meadows AT, Robison LL 2000 Changes in body mass index and prevalence of overweight in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: role of cranial irradiation. Med Pediatr Oncol 35:91–95[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Lustig RH, Post SR, Srivannaboon K, Rose SR, Danish RK, Burghen GA, Xiong X, Wu S, Merchant TE 2003 Risk factors for the development of obesity in children surviving brain tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:611–616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Dreyer ZE, Blatt J, Bleyer A 2002 Late effects of childhood cancer and its treatment. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and practice of pediatric oncology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1431–1461
  41. Aziz NM 2002 Cancer survivorship research: challenge and opportunity. J Nutr 132:3494S–3503S
  42. Bradlyn AS, Ritchey AK, Harris CV, Moore IM, Obrien RT, Parsons S, Patterson K, Pollock BH 1996 Quality of life research in pediatric oncology: research methods and barriers. Cancer 78:1333–1339[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Laughton, T. E. Merchant, C. A. Sklar, L. E. Kun, M. Fouladi, A. Broniscer, E. B. Morris, R. P. Sanders, M. J. Krasin, J. Shelso, et al.
Endocrine Outcomes for Children With Embryonal Brain Tumors After Risk-Adapted Craniospinal and Conformal Primary-Site Irradiation and High-Dose Chemotherapy With Stem-Cell Rescue on the SJMB-96 Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1112 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
R. E. Scully, T. L. Miller, and S. E. Lipshultz
Detecting Anthracycline-induced Cardiotoxicity in Survivors of Childhood Cancer
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 454 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. T. Armstrong, C. A. Sklar, M. M. Hudson, and L. L. Robison
Long-Term Health Status Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Does Sex Matter?
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2007; 25(28): 4477 - 4489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. C. Bowers, Y. Liu, W. Leisenring, E. McNeil, M. Stovall, J. G. Gurney, L. L. Robison, R. J. Packer, and K. C. Oeffinger
Late-Occurring Stroke Among Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Leukemia and Brain Tumors: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2006; 24(33): 5277 - 5282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Maunsell, L. Pogany, M. Barrera, A. K. Shaw, and K. N. Speechley
Quality of Life Among Long-Term Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2527 - 2535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
K. K. Ness, A. C. Mertens, M. M. Hudson, M. M. Wall, W. M. Leisenring, K. C. Oeffinger, C. A. Sklar, L. L. Robison, and J. G. Gurney
Limitations on Physical Performance and Daily Activities among Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 2005; 143(9): 639 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. E. Lipshultz, S. A. Vlach, S. R. Lipsitz, S. E. Sallan, M. L. Schwartz, and S. D. Colan
Cardiac Changes Associated With Growth Hormone Therapy Among Children Treated With Anthracyclines
Pediatrics, June 1, 2005; 115(6): 1613 - 1622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
D. M. Greving and S. J. Santacroce
Cardiovascular Late Effects
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, January 1, 2005; 22(1): 38 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
H K Gleeson and S M Shalet
The impact of cancer therapy on the endocrine system in survivors of childhood brain tumours
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2004; 11(4): 589 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. M. Brownstein, A. C. Mertens, P. A. Mitby, M. Stovall, J. Qin, G. Heller, L. L. Robison, and C. A. Sklar
Factors That Affect Final Height and Change in Height Standard Deviation Scores in Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated with Growth Hormone: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4422 - 4427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. A. Ross, K. C. Oeffinger, S. M. Davies, A. C. Mertens, E. K. Langer, W. R. Kiffmeyer, C. A. Sklar, M. Stovall, Y. Yasui, and L. L. Robison
Genetic Variation in the Leptin Receptor Gene and Obesity in Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2004; 22(17): 3558 - 3562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
K. C. Oeffinger and M. M. Hudson
Long-term Complications Following Childhood and Adolescent Cancer: Foundations for Providing Risk-based Health Care for Survivors
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2004; 54(4): 208 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sklar, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gurney, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sklar, C. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals