help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaskell, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, P. T. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaskell, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, P. T. K.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 1 424-432
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society


Original Article

Differential Expression of Two Estrogen Receptor ß Isoforms in the Human Fetal Testis during the Second Trimester of Pregnancy

Terri L. Gaskell, Lynne L. L. Robinson, Nigel P. Groome, Richard A. Anderson and Philippa T. K. Saunders

MRC Human Reproductive Sciences Unit (T.L.G., L.L.L.R., R.A.A., P.T.K.S.), Centre for Reproductive Biology, Edinburgh EH16 4SB; and School of Biological and Molecular Sciences (N.P.G.), Oxford Brookes University, Headington, Oxford OX3 0PB, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Philippa Saunders, MRC Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Centre for Reproductive Biology, University of Edinburgh Academic Centre, 49 Little France Cresent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom. E-mail: p.saunders{at}ed.ac.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Testicular cancer is more common in individuals with disorders of the male reproductive tract. It has been suggested that inappropriate exposure to estrogens during fetal life may have an impact on maturation of testicular germ cells that are the cells of origin of the majority of testis cancers. The aim of the present study was to establish whether human fetal germ cells (gonocytes) are a potential target of estrogen action. To address this issue, we used RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry to examine the pattern of expression of estrogen receptors (ER{alpha}, ERß, and ERß2 variant) in human fetal testes at 12–19 wk gestation. ER{alpha}, mRNA, and protein were not detected in any of the fetal testes. In contrast, using an antibody directed against the hinge domain of ERß expression was detected in multiple testicular nuclei. RT-PCR with primers specific for full-length wild-type ERß (ERß1) or the ERß2 variant formed by splicing of an alternative eighth exon, was performed on whole-tissue extracts and materials recovered by laser capture and revealed that mRNAs for both isoforms were expressed. Immunohistochemistry with isotype-specific monoclonal antibodies showed that ERß1 was low/undetectable in gonocytes, whereas these cells expressed the highest levels of ERß2, compared with other testicular cell types. Both ERß1 and ERß2 were detected in some but not all Sertoli cells, peritubular cells, and other interstitial cells including those tentatively identified as Leydig cells. Our immunohistochemical results demonstrate that during the second trimester, some but not all somatic cells within the human fetal testis express wild-type ERß (ERß1) protein and/or the variant isoform of ERß (ERß2) that lacks amino acids essential for binding of estradiol. ERß2 protein was readily detectable in fetal gonocytes, whereas ERß1 was not. We did not detect expression of ER{alpha}. The expression of ERß2, a variant proposed act as a dominant negative receptor, might prevent estrogen action in gonocytes. We suggest that during this period of fetal life, estrogenic ligands are most likely to act on somatic cells that contain ERß1 protein.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN THE PAST 50 yr, the incidence of testicular cancer has increased in many developed countries (1, 2, 3, 4). Population-based studies have shown that the occurrence of testicular cancer is higher in men with subfertility consistent with the suggestion that they have a common etiology (5, 6, 7). It is also widely accepted that germ cell tumors (with the exception of spermatocytic seminoma) develop from a common cellular precursor described as carcinoma in situ (8, 9, 10). A major advance in our understanding of the origins of malignant germ cells has been the finding that not only is the morphology of carcinoma in situ cells similar to fetal germ cells (gonocytes) but they both also express a number of common histochemical markers (11, 12, 13, 14).

One possible etiology for the increase in the incidence of testicular germ cell cancers, as well as male reproductive abnormalities, could be disturbances in the hormonal environment of the developing fetus, one aspect of which might be elevated exposure to estrogens (1, 15). Further support for this idea has been provided by data showing testicular cancer appears to be more common in individuals with disorders of the male reproductive tract including intersex, cryptorchidism, and androgen insensitivity syndrome (16, 17, 18). Studies on twins have suggested that abnormally high estrogen levels in women during pregnancy may increase the risk of sons developing testis cancer (19, 20). Li et al. (21) have reported that incubation of gonocytes from d 3 rat testes with estradiol activated proliferation in vitro, suggesting that in rodent models estrogens can have direct effects on the function of immature germ cells.

Estrogen action is mediated via high-affinity intracellular receptors expressed in target tissues. Following ligand binding the receptors undergo a conformational change, dimerize, bind regulator regions within genes, recruit cofactors, and thereby regulate the transcription of target genes (22, 23). Two subtypes of estrogen receptors (ERs), commonly known as ER{alpha} (NR3A1) and ERß (NR3A2), have been cloned from human tissues (24, 25, 26). The two receptors are encoded by genes located on different chromosomes (27) but like other members of the steroid receptor superfamily share a common arrangement of five structure-function domains, denoted A-F (28). In 1998 a novel human ERß variant, named ERßcx, was identified in a human testis cDNA library (29) (accession AB006589). In separate experiments Moore et al. (30) identified a number of mRNAs in human tissues, including testis, which encoded hERß isoforms including one identical to hERßcx that they named hERß2. To avoid confusion, the original hERß protein identified as the homolog of the rat ERß will be referred to as hERß1 and the hERßcx/hERß2 splice variant will be referred to as hERß2 for the rest of this article.

We and others (31, 32) have shown previously that adult human testicular germ cells express ERß but not ER{alpha}. In fetal rat testes, ERß protein has been localized to multiple cell types including fetal germ cells (gonocytes) (33, 34). Limited data have been presented for human fetal testes. For example, Brandenberger et al. (35) have demonstrated the presence of hERß mRNA but did not determine in which cell type the mRNA was expressed. Takeyama et al. (36) reported expression of ERß in cells within the human fetal testis when they used tissue from a single fetus obtained at 20 wk gestation.

The aim of the present study was to establish whether human fetal germ cells are a potential target of estrogen action. To address this issue, we used RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry to examine pattern of expression of ERs in human fetal testes obtained from 13–19 wk gestation. Because we have recently demonstrated that both wild-type ERß1 and the variant isoform, ERß2, are expressed in adult human germ cells (37), the initial study was extended using laser capture microscopy and immunohistochemistry with isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies to determine whether one or both isoforms were also expressed in the fetal germ cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recovery of fetal testes

Human fetal testes were obtained following medical termination of pregnancy during the second trimester (up to 19 wk). Women gave consent according to national guidelines (38), and the study was approved by the Lothian Pediatrics/Reproductive Medicine Research Ethics Subcommittee. Termination of pregnancy was induced by treatment with mifepristone (200 mg orally), followed by prostaglandin E1 analog (Gemeprost, Beacon Pharmaceuticals, Tunbridge Wells, UK) 1 mg given every 3 h in the vagina. None of the terminations were for reasons of fetal abnormality, and all fetuses appeared morphologically normal. Gestational age was determined by ultrasound and confirmed by subsequent direct measurement of foot length; 30 specimens were examined.

Testes were either fixed for immunohistochemical analysis and laser capture microdissection or snap frozen and stored at -70 C before recovery of RNA. Fixation was carried out in Bouin’s fluid for 5 h, followed by transfer to 70% ethanol before processing into paraffin using standard methods (39).

Antibodies

A rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) (40) was a kind gift from Drs. Rodolfo Rey and Natalie Josso (INSERM 493, Montrouge, France). Mouse monoclonal antihuman ER{alpha} was purchased from DAKO Corp. (clone 1D5, Cambridge, UK). ERß proteins were detected using three different antibodies. In preliminary experiments immunohistochemistry was carried out with an affinity-purified sheep polyclonal antiserum directed against hERß peptide P4 (hinge domain) prepared as described (41). In subsequent studies two specific mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against ERß1 (peptide P7) and ERß2 (peptide P8) were used. The monoclonal antibodies were prepared as described (37, 41). The specificity of all antibodies used was initially confirmed by Western blotting using recombinant proteins (31, 37, 41). When proteins are extracted from human tissues (endometrium, placenta, prostate) two sizes of each ERß protein can be detected corresponding to the use of alternative start sites within the mRNAs of both isotypes (Refs. 41 and 42 ; Scobie, G. A., and P. T. K. Saunders, unpublished observations).

Isolation of RNA and synthesis of cDNA

Intact testicular tissues. Total RNA was extracted from snap-frozen samples of fetal testis (12–19 wk gestation) using the RNeasy minikit (QIAGEN, Crawley, UK). RNA was treated with Dnase (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, UK) and RT performed using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Diagnostics, Lewes, UK). One microgram of total RNA was incubated with oligo (dT)18 primer for 10 min at 65 C and then placed on ice. A reaction mix comprising buffer, 1 mM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, ribonuclease inhibitor, and 50 U reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) was added to each tube in a total volume of 50 µl, and the tubes were then incubated at 40 C for 2 h.

Cells isolated by laser capture microscopy. Sections (5 µm) were cut from paraffin wax-embedded 13- and 19-wk-old human fetal testes and mounted onto plain, uncharged glass slides. Sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and then subjected to immunostaining. To visualize Sertoli cells within the seminiferous cords, rabbit anti-AMH was used at a concentration of 1:200 and staining performed as detailed below, except that antigen retrieval was for 30 sec and incubation times were reduced to 10 min at each stage. RNase inhibitor (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) was included in all reagents to minimize RNA degradation. After color development with diaminobenzidine, the sections were dehydrated through graded alcohols and finally xylene. Sections were stored in a vacuum desiccator containing silica gel for at least 30 min before capture. Care was taken throughout to avoid RNase contamination of sections, and all aqueous solutions were prepared with diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water.

Individual cell fragments were captured from the stained sections using the PixCell II LCM system (Arcturus Engineering Inc., Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, each section was overlaid with a thermoplastic membrane mounted on optically transparent caps, and cell fragments were captured by focal melting of the membrane because of laser activation. The parameters of the laser shot used in this study were: 7.5 µm diameter spot, 45 mW power, and 0.5 msec duration of laser pulse. The same parameters and number of laser shots (~600) were used for each cell type captured. Figure 1Go shows the appearance of a section of human fetal testis that had been stained with anti-AMH antibodies before (Fig. 1AGo) and after (Fig. 1BGo) laser capture. The purity of the captured populations was assessed by examining the cell fragments on the cap-mounted membrane; populations substantially enriched for gonocytes (Fig. 1CGo) or Sertoli cells (Fig. 1DGo) were obtained.



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Recovery of human fetal germ cells and Sertoli cells by laser capture microscopy. A section of human fetal testis (19 wk) that had been immunostained for AMH [brown immunopositive staining specific to Sertoli cell cytoplasm (Sc)] before (A, arrows mark position of immunonegative gonocytes) and after (B, asterisk shows area in which cells have been removed) retrieval of cellular materials by laser capture. The cellular constituents of the isolated populations were checked by examining the cap-mounted membrane; populations containing gonocytes (C, arrows) or Sertoli cells (D) were obtained. In, Interstitium.

 
Total RNA was extracted from the microdissected samples using the Micro-RNA isolation kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). After incubation with 200 µl denaturing buffer containing 1.6 µl ß-mercaptoethanol at room temperature for 10 min, the sample was extracted with 20 µl 2 mM sodium acetate, 220 µl phenol, and 60 µl chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1). The aqueous phase was mixed with 1 µl of 10 mg/ml glycogen and then precipitated with 200 µl cold isopropanol. The pellet was then washed in 70% ethanol before being air dried and resuspended in 5 µl RNase-free H2O. The extracted RNA was reverse transcribed using 10 pmol random hexamer primers and 200 U reverse transcriptase (Superscript II; Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An aliquot of the resulting first-strand cDNA was then amplified using a modified degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR protocol (43) using the universal primer UN1 (5'-CCGACTCGAGNNNNNNATGTGG-3') in a total volume of 25 µl. Amplified cDNA (5 µl) was then used in subsequent PCR reactions with primer sets for specific sequences (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Sequences of primers used for PCR reactions

 
Amplification of specific sequences from cDNA by PCR

PCR was performed using either 1 µl (whole-issue extracts) or 5 µl (samples from LCM) cDNA as a template in a total volume of 25 µl containing 0.2 mM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 50 pmol each forward and reverse primer and RedTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Positive and negative (no template) reactions were also included in each set of reactions. PCR amplification consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94 C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles (whole tissue) or 55 cycles (LCM samples) of denaturation at 94 C for 30 sec, annealing at 58–60 C (depending on primer pair) for 30 sec, and extension at 72 C for 45 sec; a final extension period at 72 C for 10 min completed the amplification. To visualize AMH mRNAs in LCM samples, a second round of amplification using nested primer sets was required. One microliter of the primary PCR reaction was used as template, and the cycle described above was repeated 20 times. All primer pairs were designed to span introns to avoid amplification from contaminating genomic DNA. Primer sequences are detailed in Table 1Go. Note that ER{alpha} cDNA was amplified with primers identical to ER{alpha}-specific set 1 (exon 1–3) published previously by Lau et al. (44) (amplified product 650 bp). PCR products were analyzed on 1.0% (wt/vol) agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and visualized using a UV transilluminator.

Immunocytochemistry

Sections (5 µm) of Bouin’s fixed, paraffin-embedded fetal testis were mounted on charged glass slides, dewaxed, rehydrated, and subjected to heat-induced antigen retrieval for 5 min in 100 mM glycine buffer (pH 3.5). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation in 3% (vol/vol) H2O2 in methanol for 3 min. After a wash in water, slides were transferred into Tris-buffered saline [TBS; 0.05 M Tris, 0.85% NaCl (pH7.6)] for 5 min and blocked for 30 min in normal rabbit serum (NRS) (Diagnostics Scotland, Carluke, UK) diluted 1:4 in TBS containing 5% BSA (NRS/TBS/BSA). Antibodies were diluted (ER{alpha} 1:50, ERß 1:800, ERß1 1:50, ERß2 1:50) in NRS/TBS/BSA and applied to the sections at 4 C overnight. Negative controls using either the preimmune serum of the sheep used to raise the anti-ERß P4 antibody or normal mouse serum were included in all runs. Sections were washed in TBS and then incubated for 30 min with biotinylated rabbit antimouse IgG (DAKO Corp.) diluted 1:500 in NRS/TBS/BSA. Following washes in TBS, sections were incubated with avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase-linked complex (DAKO Corp.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Bound antibody was visualized using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAKO Corp.).

Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, mounted, and visualized by light microscopy. Images were captured using a Provis microscope (Olympus Corp., London, UK) equipped with a DCS330 camera (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY), stored on a Macintosh Power PC computer, and assembled using Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe, Mountain View, CA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of ER{alpha} and ERß in human fetal testes

Although ER{alpha}-specific PCR products were detected in a cDNA prepared from human endometrium (positive control) (45), no specific signal was present in the cDNA pools prepared from fetal testes obtained on 13–19 wk gestation (Fig. 2Go, top). In contrast, ERß-specific cDNAs were amplified from the same set of testicular cDNAs using primers specific for exons 1 and 4 of the receptor (Fig. 2Go, middle). All samples tested were positive for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA (Fig. 2Go, bottom).



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The mRNA-encoding ERß but not ER{alpha} are expressed in human fetal testes. PCR amplification with primers specific for the ER{alpha} (650 bp) and ERß (exons 1–4, 668 bp) revealed that ERß but not ER{alpha} mRNAs were detected in human fetal testes (12–17 wk gestation). Control tissue (human endometrium, lane E) was positive for ER{alpha}. Negative controls prepared without reverse transcriptase (n) did not contain specific amplified products. GAPDH was amplified from all samples containing cDNA (bottom) but not from the negative control. The 100-bp markers (M) were run on all gels.

 
Following immunohistochemistry the gonocytes were characterized as having the largest round nuclei within the seminiferous cords and surrounded by a clear area of cytoplasm (Figs. 1AGo and 3Go, B and D, arrows). Sertoli cell nuclei were more numerous than those of the gonocytes and were usually more oval than round (Sc) (Fig. 3Go). Consistent with the data obtained by RT-PCR, we failed to detect expression of ER{alpha} protein within the nuclei of any of the cell types within the human fetal testis at any age examined (Fig. 3Go, A and B); immunopositive staining was present within nuclei of efferent ductules adjacent to the gonad (ED) (Fig. 3AGo). Using a polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide within the hinge domain (D) of hERß (41), immunopositive staining was detected in the nuclei of multiple cell types including gonocytes (arrows), Sertoli cells (Sc), and interstitial cells (In) (Fig. 3Go, C and D).



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical comparison between expression of ER{alpha} and ERß in human fetal testes. ER{alpha} protein was not detected in any cell type within the human fetal testis (*) at any age examined (A and B, 16 wk), although protein was present in the nuclei of the epithelial cells lining the efferent ductules (ED in A) when they were present within the same tissue blocks. An antibody raised against the hinge domain of ERß detected protein in multiple cell types within the testis (C and D, 17 wk) including Sertoli cells (Sc) and gonocytes (arrows); some but not all cells within the interstitium (In) were also immunopositive (D). Magnifications: A, x20; B, x100; C, x40; D, x100.

 
Expression of hERß1 and hERß2 mRNAs in total testicular extracts

By RT-PCR, a single band corresponding to the expected size was amplified from fetal testes at all gestational ages examined (13–19 wk) using primers specific for ERß1 and ERß2 and GAPDH (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The mRNAs specific for ERß1 and ERß2 are both expressed in human fetal testes. RT-PCR was performed with ERß isotype-specific primers on samples extracted from whole testes recovered between 13 and 19 wk gestation. Top, ERß1 (261 bp); middle, ERß2 (251 bp); bottom, GAPDH control. Markers (M) were run on all gels; no product was amplified in reactions that did not contain cDNA (n).

 
Expression of ERß1 and ERß2 mRNAs in cell populations recovered by laser capture microscopy

Using RT-PCR, both ERß1- and ERß2-specific cDNAs were detected in amplified cDNA pools prepared from RNA extracted from fetal gonocytes and Sertoli cells isolated by LCM (Fig 5Go). Both ERß1 and ERß2 cDNAs were detected in all samples. We have previously demonstrated the expression of the germ cell-specific marker c-kit by RT-PCR in LCM-generated fetal germ cell samples (46). In the present study, samples were analyzed by RT-PCR using primers for the Sertoli cell-specific protein AMH (47); the results confirmed that the cDNA pool prepared from gonocytes isolated by LCM was not significantly contaminated with Sertoli cell cytoplasm (Fig. 5Go). RT-PCR was performed using GAPDH primers to check the quality of cDNA generated from the laser-captured samples (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Expression of ERß1 and ERß2 mRNAs were detected by RT-PCR in cell-specific contents recovered by laser capture microscopy. Complementary DNAs were subjected to amplification and PCR using two rounds of amplification, the second using nested primers. Each panel is labeled according to the primers used as follows: ERß1 (nested), ERß2 (nested), AMH (nested), GAPDH. RNA samples were originally extracted from human fetal testis (19 wk, T) or gonocyte (G) and Sertoli (S) cell fragments recovered by LCM from fixed testes of 13 or 19 wk gestation. Negative controls (no input cDNA) were run with all reactions. The 100-bp markers (M) were run on all gels.

 
Immunolocalization of ERß1 and ERß2

Both ERß1 and ERß2 proteins were immunolocalized to cell nuclei in all specimens examined (Fig. 6Go). The patterns of expression of the two proteins were distinct but overlapping and were identical in samples from all ages examined (13–19 wk) in samples fixed in Bouins (present study), neutral buffered formalin, or Methacarn (Millar, M. R., unpublished observations). Intense immunopositive staining for ERß1 was detected in some (Fig. 6Go, C and E, arrowheads) Sertoli cell nuclei. Immunopositive staining was also detected in interstitial cells including peritubular myoid cells and the surface epithelium but gonocytes were immunonegative (Fig. 6Go, A, C, and E, arrows). In contrast, the most intense immunopositive reaction for ERß2 was detected in the fetal gonocytes (Fig. 6Go, B, D, and F, arrows) with apparently lower levels of expression within Sertoli cells (Fig. 6FGo, arrowheads), peritubular cells, and intersitial cells (In, Fig. 6FGo). With both antibodies, Sertoli cell nuclei that appeared to be immunonegative (Fig. 6Go, E and F, asterisks) were present.



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Expression of ERß1 and ERß2 proteins in human fetal testes is cell specific. Fixed-tissue samples from testes recovered at 13 (A and B), 17 (C and D), and 19 (E and F) wk gestation were used to immunolocalize ERß1 (A, C, and E) and ERß2 (B, D, and F) proteins. Results at all ages were similar. ERß1 protein was detected in Sertoli cells (arrowheads) and interstitial cells (In) including those surrounding the cords but not in gonocytes (A and E, arrows). In contrast, ERß2 immunostaining was most abundant in gonocytes (B and F, arrows) and was less intense in somatic cells including Sertoli (F, arrowheads), peritubular cells, and other intersitial cells (In, F). Asterisks show the positions of Sc nuclei that were immunonegative for ERß1 (E) or ERß2 (F). Magnification: C and D, x40; A, B, E, and F, x100.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study we have investigated the pattern of expression of ERs within human fetal testes obtained during the second trimester as part of a study on the role of estrogenic ligands in development of the testis and male accessory organs (48, 49).

In agreement with our previous studies on the fixed adult human testis (31), we did not detect expression of ER{alpha} in any testicular cell type, although expression was evident in cell nuclei lining the efferent ductules at all ages examined. These results are in contrast to those using rodent testes in which ER{alpha} mRNA and protein were easily detected in both fetal and adult Leydig cells (33, 50). Using a polyclonal antibody directed against the hinge domain of ERß, immunopositive staining appeared to be present in the majority of cell types and most intense in the fetal germ cells; ERß mRNA was detected in testicular extracts by RT-PCR. The results are in agreement with those of Brandenberger et al. (35), who reported a strong signal from human fetal testis using a primer set directed against exons 1 and 2 of ERß. Because the primers and antibody we used in these initial investigations could cross-react not only with wild-type ERß (hERß1) but also with the ERß2 receptor splice variant (37), all further investigations were undertaken using either primers or antibodies that were isotype specific.

RT-PCR using isoform-specific primers detected expression of both ERß1 and ERß2 mRNAs in whole testicular extracts of samples obtained between 13 and 19 wk gestation. The isoform-specific primers were then used to interrogate cDNA generated from laser capture microdissected germ cells and Sertoli cells obtained from fixed sections of fetal testis. We confirmed that both ERß1 and ERß2 mRNAs could be detected in extracts from both cell pools. RT-PCR with specific AMH primers was used to verify that the germ cell cDNA pool was not significantly contaminated with Sertoli cell material. To ensure that the mRNAs were translated into receptor proteins, we also performed immunohistochemistry on fixed-tissue sections with isotype-specific monoclonal antibodies that have been used previously on adult tissue sections (37, 51). We found that the expression patterns of ERß1 and ERß2 were distinct but overlapping and did not alter over the gestational range tested. The same pattern of ERß1 expression was seen in tissues fixed with neutral buffered formalin or Methacarn, although background staining tended to be higher in the formalin-fixed samples (Gaskell, T. L., unpublished observations). Both isoforms of ERß were detected in some, but not all, Sertoli cell nuclei. The immunoexpression of ERß1 appeared to be more intense than that of ERß2. It is notable that the opposite was observed using fixed sections of adult human testes, i.e. adult Sertoli cells were more intensely stained with anti-ERß2 than with anti-ERß1 (37), although we should be cautious of making direct comparisons because the intensity of staining may also be influenced by antibody affinity. In the interstitium both ERß1 and ERß2 were detected in peritubular cells and other intersitial cells some of which may be fetal Leydig cells; immunostaining for ERß2 was generally more widespread and intense than ERß1.

The most striking difference in the pattern of expression of the two isoforms was observed within the fetal germ cell population in which, although mRNA for ERß1 was detected in isolated cell fragments recovered using LCM using a sensitive RT-PCR assay, we failed to detect the protein using fixed-tissue sections with a range of antibody dilutions. In contrast, both ERß2 mRNA and protein were readily detectable in most gonocytes at all ages examined. A recent study by Takeyama et al. (36) made use of a polyclonal antibody raised against synthetic peptides from the C-terminal region of ERß, which would be expected to be specific to ERß1. The results presented were from a single 20-wk human fetus in which the testis was fixed in neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and subjected to antigen retrieval with citrate buffer, which in our experience results in a higher background level of staining than when glycine buffer is used (Millar, M. R., and T. L. Gaskell, unpublished observations). ERß1 immunoreactivity in Sertoli cells, interstitial cells, and very weakly within germ cells was detected. In the present study, it was notable that the pattern of expression of ERß detected with the polyclonal antibody that cross-reacts with both ERß variants appeared to represent the sum of the expression of ERß1 and ERß2 (compare Figs. 3Go and 6Go). Examination of adult testes with the same isotype-specific antisera has shown that ERß1 is the predominant isoform expressed in the germ cell lineage and that with the exception of some spermatogonial cells (possibly A type), expression of ERß2 protein was largely confined to somatic cells (37). The present study was limited to the examination of tissues recovered in the second trimester of pregnancy during the period when we are able to recover testes following elective termination of pregnancy. We had hoped to extend the current study to include fetuses from later stages of gestation but have found that because these tissues were obtained after fetal death/stillbirth, tissue preservation is compromised and cell-specific patterns of expression difficult to interpret.

The ability of a range of ligands to bind to ERß1 and activate reporter gene expression has been widely reported (52, 53, 54, 55). The receptor has been shown to bind to estrogen-responsive elements (EREs) or other promoter sites such as activator protein-1 elements either as a homodimer or heterodimer with ER{alpha} (54, 55, 56). The ligand-binding domains of ER{alpha} and ERß have been crystallized in the presence of a range of ligands, and key amino acids involved in ligand-receptor interaction have been identified (57, 58, 59). Binding of ligand agonists such as estradiol and diethylstilbestrol induces a conformational change in the ligand-binding domain resulting in realignment of the 12th helical domain of the protein (58). Notably, helix 12 adopts a different conformation when the ligand-binding pocket is occupied by an antiestrogen such as raloxifene (58, 59). Analysis of steroid receptor gene activation following steroid binding has demonstrated that it is substantially enhanced or diminished by recruitment of coactivator or corepressor proteins, respectively (60, 61). Mutation studies have shown that amino acids within helix 12 are essential for recruitment of cofactors containing the LXXLL motif, and this region is termed the AF-2 domain of the receptor (62).

In contrast, studies using ERß2 transfected into COS cells showed that the protein was unable to bind estradiol and did not induce expression of an ERE-chloramphenicol acetyl transferase reporter construct in the presence or absence of estradiol and was incapable of interacting with the coregulator TIF1a (29). Recombinant ERß2 has been shown to bind a 32P-labeled ERE in gel shift experiments both as a homo- and heterodimer with ERß1 (30). These findings are consistent with sequence analysis showing that ERß2 protein is formed from an mRNA containing an alternative exon at its 3' end. The net result of this change is the loss of 61 amino acids from the wild-type ERß1 sequence and replacement with a unique 26 amino acid sequence (29). Helix 12 and the AF-2 domain of ERß1 consist of amino acids encoded by the last exon of ERß1, but only one of the amino acids identified as essential to ER dimerization is found in this region (58, 63). Therefore, it is not surprising that ERß2 is capable of forming dimmers but is unable to recruit the cofactor TIF 1a (29, 30). Tremblay et al. (64) showed that the absence of a functional AF-2 domain in one partner of a steroid receptor dimer is sufficient to impair transcriptional activity of the full-length heterodimeric partner. Consistent with this, when ERß2 was cotransfected with ER{alpha} the receptor acted as a dominant negative inhibitor of ER{alpha}-induced transactivation (29). We speculated that the expression of ERß2 in fetal cells such as gonocytes may, therefore, prevent them responding to endogenous or exogenous estrogens especially because the expression of wild-type ERß1 protein in these cells was below the limit of detection of our immunohistochemical assay.

This study was undertaken to determine whether ERs were expressed within the fetal human germ cells because exposure to estrogens had been suggested to contribute to the abnormal differentiation of gonocytes and the development of testicular cancer. We found that the functional wild-type hERß1 and the hERß2 C-terminal splice variant are both expressed in the human fetal testis from 13–19 wk gestation. Expression of ER{alpha} was not detected in the same samples. Although expression of hERß1 and hERß2 mRNAs could be detected in highly amplified cDNA pools prepared from fetal gonocyte material recovered by LCM, immunohistochemistry consistently revealed expression of ERß2 but not ERß1 in the fetal germ cells, suggesting that either ERß1 protein had not been transplated from the mRNA or the amount of protein was very low. ERß1 protein was easily detectable by immunohistochemistry in some but not all somatic cells including Sertoli cells adjacent to the immunonegative germ cells within the seminiferous cords. We, therefore, suggest that the human fetal germ cells may not respond directly to estrogenic ligands during the second trimester but that estrogens could act via Sertoli, peritubular, or Leydig cells at this time of life.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Graeme Scobie for supplying ER{alpha} and ERß (common) primers, Lee Evans for preparation of monoclonals, and Mike Millar and Sheila McPherson for assistance with immunohistochemistry.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviations: AMH, Anti-Mullerian hormone; ER, estrogen receptor; ERE, estrogen-responsive element; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; NRS, normal rabbit serum; TBS, Tris-buffered saline.

Received May 28, 2002.

Accepted September 16, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A, Grandjean P, Guillette LJ, Jegou B, Jensen TK, Jouannet P, Keiding N, Leffers H, McLachlan JA, Meyer O, Muller J, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Scheike T, Sharpe RM, Sumpter J, Skakkebaek NE 1996 Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect 104:741–803
  2. McKiernan JM, Goluboff ET, Liberson GL, Golden R, Fisch H 1999 Rising risk of testicular cancer by birth cohort in the United States from 1973 to 1995. J Urol 162:361–363[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Adami H-O, Bergstrom R, Mohner M, Zatonski W, Storm H, Ekbom A, Tretli S, Teppo L, Ziegler H, Rahu M, Gurevicius R, Stengrevics A 1994 Testicular cancer in nine northern European countries. Int J Cancer 59:33–38[Medline]
  4. Moller H 2001 Trends in incidence of testicular cancer and prostate cancer in Denmark. Hum Reprod 16:1007–1011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jacobsen R, Bostofte E, Engholm G, Hansen J, Olsen JH, Skakkebaek NE, Moller H 2000 Risk of testicular cancer in men with abnormal semen characteristics: cohort study. BMJ 321:789–792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Fossa SD, Kravdal O 2000 Fertility in Norwegian testicular cancer patients. Br J Cancer 82:737–741[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Moller H, Skakkebaek NE 1999 Risk of testicular cancer in subfertile men: case-control study. BMJ 318:559–562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Skakkebaek NE 1972 Possible carcinoma in situ of the testis. Lancet 2:516–517[Medline]
  9. Skakkebaek NE 1975 Atypical germ cells in the adjacent "normal" tissue of testicular tumours. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [A] 83:127–130[Medline]
  10. Skakkebaek NE 1978 Carcinoma in situ of the testis: frequency and relationship to invasive germ cell tumours in infertile men. Histopathology 2:157–170[Medline]
  11. Jorgensen N, Giwercman A, Muller J, Skakkebaek NE 1993 Immunohistochemical markers of carcinoma in situ of the testis also expressed in normal infantile germ cells. Histopathology 22:373–378[Medline]
  12. Jorgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Graem N, Muller J, Giwercman A, Skakkebaek NE 1995 Expression of immunohistochemical markers for testicular carcinoma in situ by normal human fetal germ cells. Lab Invest 72:223–231[Medline]
  13. Skakkebaek NE, Berthelsen JG, Giwercman A, Muller J 1987 Carcinoma in situ of the testis: possible origin from gonocytes and precursor of all types of germ cell tumours except spermatocytoma. Int J Androl 10:19–28[Medline]
  14. Bartkova J, Falck J, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE, Lukas J, Bartek J 2001 Chk2 tumour suppressor protein in human spermatogenesis and testicular germ-cell tumours. Oncogene 20:5897–5902[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Sharpe RM, Skakkebaek NE 1993 Are oestrogens involved in falling sperm counts and disorders of the reproductive tract? Lancet 341:125–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Skakkebaek NE 1979 Carcinoma in situ of testis in testicular feminization syndrome. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A 87:87–89[Medline]
  17. Muller J, Skakkebaek NE 1984 Testicular carcinoma in situ in children with the androgen insensitivity (testicular feminisation) syndrome. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 288:1419–1420
  18. Krabbe S, Skakkebaek NE, Berthelsen JG, Eyben FV, Volsted P, Mauritzen K, Eldrup J, Nielsen AH 1979 High incidence of undetected neoplasia in maldescended testes. Lancet 1:999–1000[Medline]
  19. Swerdlow AJ, De Stavola BL, Swainwick MA, Maconochie NE 1997 Risk of breast and testicular cancers in young adult twins in England and Wales: evidence on prenatal and genetic aetiology. Lancet 350:1723–1728[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Braun MM, Ahlbom A, Floderus B, Brinton LA, Hoover RN 1995 Effect of twinship on incidence of cancer of the testis, breast and other sites (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 6:519–524[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Li H, Papadopoulos V, Vidic B, Dym M, Cluty M 1997 Regulation of rat testis gonocyte proliferation by platelet derived growth factor and estradiol: identification of signalling mechanisms involved. Endocrinology 138:1289–1298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Nilsson S, Makela S, Treuter E, Tujague M, Thomsen J, Andersson G, Enmark E, Pettersson K, Warner M, Gustafsson JA 2001 Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol Rev 81:1535–1565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Klinge CM 2001 Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2905–2919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Green S, Walter P, Kumar V, Krust A, Bornert J-M, Argos P, Chambon P 1986 Human oestrogen receptor cDNA: sequence, expression and homology to v-erb-A. Nature 320:134–139[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Mosselman S, Polman J, Dijkema R 1996 ERß: identification and characterization of a novel human estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett 392:49–53[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Ogawa S, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Hiroi H, Orimo A, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Muramatsu M 1998 The complete primary structure of human estrogen receptor ß (hER ß) and its heterodimerization with ER {alpha} in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 243:122–126[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Grandien K, Lagercrantz S, Lagercrantz J, Fried G, Nordenskjold M, Gustafsson J-A 1997 Human estrogen receptor ß-gene structure, chromosomal localization, and expression pattern. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:4258–4265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Beato M, Klug J 2000 Steroid hormone receptors: an update. Hum Reprod Update 6:225–236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ogawa S, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Orimo A, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Muramatsu M 1998 Molecular cloning and characterization of human estrogen receptor ßcx: a potential inhibitor of estrogen action in human. Nucleic Acids Res 26:3505–3512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Moore JT, McKee DD, Slentz-Kesler K, Moore LB, Jones SA, Horne EL, Su JL, Kliewer SA, Lehmann JM, Willson TM 1998 Cloning and characterisation of human estrogen receptor ß isoforms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 247:75–78[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Saunders PTK, Sharpe RM, Williams K, Macpherson S, Urquhart H, Irvine DS, Millar MR 2001 Differential expression of oestrogen receptor {alpha} and ß proteins in the testes and male reproductive system of human and non-human primates. Mol Hum Reprod 7:227–236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Makinen S, Makela S, Weihua Z, Warner M, Rosenlund B, Salmi S, Hovatta O, Gustafsson J-A 2001 Localization of oestrogen receptors {alpha} and ß in human testis. Mol Hum Reprod 7:497–503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Saunders PT, Fisher JS, Sharpe RM, Millar MR 1998 Expression of oestrogen receptor ß (ER ß) occurs in multiple cell types, including some germ cells, in the rat testis. J Endocrinol 156:R13–R17
  34. Van Pelt AM, de Rooij DG, van der Burg B, van der Saag PT, Gustafsson J-A, Kuiper GGJM 1999 Ontogeny of estrogen receptor-ß expression in rat testis. Endocrinology 140:478–483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Brandenberger AW, Tee MK, Lee JY, Chao V, Jaffe RB 1997 Tissue distribution of estrogen receptors {alpha} (ER-{alpha}) and ß (ER-ß) mRNA in the midgestation human fetus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3509–3512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Takeyama J, Suzuki T, Inoue S, Kaneko C, Nagura H, Harada N, Sasano H 2001 Expression and cellular localization of estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß in the human fetus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2258–2262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Saunders PTK, Millar MR, Macpherson S, Irvine DS, Groome NP, Evans LR, Sharpe RM, Scobie GA 2002 Estrogen receptor ß (ERß1), and the estrogen receptor ß 2 splice variant (ERßcx/2), are expressed in distinct cell populations in the adult human testis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:2706–2715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Polkinghorne J 1989 Review of the guidance on the research use of fetuses and fetal material. London: HMSO
  39. Millar MR, Sharpe RM, Maguire SM, Saunders PTK 1993 Cellular localisation of messenger RNAs in rat testis: application of digoxigenin labelled probes to embedded tissue. Cell Tissue Res 273:269–277[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Josso N, Picard J-Y 1986 Anti-mullerian hormone. Physiol Rev 66:1038–1090[Free Full Text]
  41. Saunders PTK, Millar MR, Williams K, Macpherson S, Harkiss D, Anderson RA, Orr B, Groome NP, Scobie G, Fraser HM 2000 Differential expression of estrogen receptor-{alpha} and -ß and androgen receptor in the ovaries of marmoset and human. Biol Reprod 63:1098–1105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Saunders PTK, Millar MR, Williams K, Macpherson S, Bayne C, O’Sullivan C, Anderson TJ, Groome NP, Miller WR 2002 Expression of oestrogen receptor ß (ERß1) protein in human breast cancer biopsies. Br J Cancer 86:250–256[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Kasai T, Shimajiri S, Hashimoto H 2000 Detection of SYT-SSX fusion transcripts in both epithelial and spindle cell areas of biphasic synovial sarcoma using laser capture microdissection. Mol Pathol 53:107–110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Lau K-M, Mok SC, Ho S-M 1999 Expression of human estrogen receptor {alpha} and -ß, progesterone receptor, and androgen receptor mRNA in normal and malignant ovarian epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5722–5727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Critchley HOD, Brenner RM, Drudy TA, Williams KA, Nayak NR, Millar MR, Saunders PTK 2001 Estrogen receptor ß, but not estrogen receptor {alpha}, is present in the vascular endothelium of the human and nonhuman primate endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1370–1378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Robinson LLL, Gaskell TL, Saunders PTK, Anderson RA 2001 Germ cell specific expression of c-kit in the human fetal gonad. Mol Hum Reprod 7:845–852[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Josso N 1992 Anti-mullerian hormone and Sertoli cell function. Horm Res 38:72–76
  48. Williams K, Saunders PTK, Atanassova N, Fisher JS, Turner KJ, Millar MR, McKinnell C, Sharpe RM 2000 Induction of progesterone receptor immunoexpression in stromal tissue throughout the male reproductive tract after neonatal oestrogen treatment of rats. Mol Cell Endocrinol 164:117–131[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Williams K, McKinnell C, Saunders PTK, Walker M, Fisher JS, Turner KJ, Atanassova N, Sharpe RM 2001 Neonatal exposure to potent and environmental oestrogens and abnormalities of the male reproductive system in the rat: evidence for the importance of the androgen-oestrogen balance and assessment of relevance to man. Hum Reprod Update 7:236–247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Fisher J, Millar MR, Majdic G, Saunders PTK, Fraser HM, Sharpe RM 1997 Immunolocalisation of oestrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER{alpha}) within the testis and excurrent ducts of the rat and marmoset monkey from perinatal life to adulthood. J Endocrinol 153:485–495[Abstract]
  51. Scobie GS, Macpherson S, Millar MR, Groome NP, Romana PG, Saunders PTK2002 Human estrogen receptors: differential expression of ER{alpha} and ß and the identification of ERß variants. Steroids 67:985–992
  52. Kuiper GGJM, Carlsson B, Grandien K, Enmark E, Haggblad J, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J-A 1997 Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß. Endocrinology 138:863–870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Hall JM, McDonnell DP 1999 The estrogen receptor ß-isoform (ERß) of the human estrogen receptor modulates ER{alpha} transcriptional activity and is a key regulator of the cellular response to estrogens and antiestrogens. Endocrinology 140:5566–5578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Pace P, Taylor J, Suntharalingam S, Coombes RC, Ali S 1997 Human estrogen receptor ß binds DNA in a manner similar to, and dimerizes with, estrogen receptor ß. J Biol Chem 272:25832–25838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Paech K, Webb P, Kuiper GGJM, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J-A, Kushner PJ, Scanlan TS 1997 Differential ligand activation of estrogen receptors ER{alpha} and ERß at AP1 sites. Science 277:1508–1510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Cowley SM, Hoare S, Mosselman S, Parker SG 1997 Estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß form heterodimers on DNA. J Biol Chem 272:19858–19862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Brzozowski AM, Pike ACW, Dauter Z, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Engstrom O, Ohman L, Greene GL, Gustafsson J-A, Carlquist M 1997 Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the estrogen receptor. Nature 389:753–758[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Tanenbaum DM, Wang Y, Williams SP, Sigler PB 1998 Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor’s ligand binding domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5998–6003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Pike ACW, Brzozowski AM, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Thorsell A-G, Engstrom O, Ljunggren J, Gustafsson J-A, Carlquist M 1999 Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor ß in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist. EMBO J 18:4608–4618[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Klinge CM 2000 Estrogen receptor interaction with co-activators and co-repressors. Steroids 65:227–251[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Pettersson K, Gustafsson J-A 2001 Role of estrogen receptor ß in estrogen action. Annu Rev Physiol 63:165–192[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Heery DM, Kalkhoven E, Hoare S, Parker MG 1997 A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors. Nature 387:733–736[CrossRef][Medline]
  63. Lees JA, Fawell SE, White R, Parker MG 1990 A 22-amino acid peptide restores DNA-binding activity to dimerization-defective mutants of the estrogen receptor. Mol Cell Biol 10:5529–5531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Tremblay GB, Tremblay A, Labrie F, Giguere V 1999 Dominant activity of activation function (AF-1) and differential stoichiometric requirements for AF-1 and -2 in the estrogen receptor {alpha}-ß heterodimeric complex. Mol Cell Biol 19:1919–1927[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. Montani, M. Penza, M. Jeremic, G. Biasiotto, G. La Sala, M. De Felici, P. Ciana, A. Maggi, and D. Di Lorenzo
Genistein is an Efficient Estrogen in the Whole-Body throughout Mouse Development
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2008; 103(1): 57 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. Bouskine, M. Nebout, B. Mograbi, F. Brucker-Davis, C. Roger, and P. Fenichel
Estrogens Promote Human Testicular Germ Cell Cancer through a Membrane-Mediated Activation of Extracellular Regulated Kinase and Protein Kinase A
Endocrinology, February 1, 2008; 149(2): 565 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. F.G Lucas, E. R Siu, C. A Esteves, H. P Monteiro, C. A Oliveira, C. S Porto, and M. F. M Lazari
17Beta-Estradiol Induces the Translocation of the Estrogen Receptors ESR1 and ESR2 to the Cell Membrane, MAPK3/1 Phosphorylation and Proliferation of Cultured Immature Rat Sertoli Cells
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2008; 78(1): 101 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.M. Coutts, N. Fulton, and R.A. Anderson
Environmental toxicant-induced germ cell apoptosis in the human fetal testis
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2912 - 2918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Boukari, M. L. Ciampi, A. Guiochon-Mantel, J. Young, M. Lombes, and G. Meduri
Human fetal testis: source of estrogen and target of estrogen action
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1885 - 1892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E. Rajpert-De Meyts
Developmental model for the pathogenesis of testicular carcinoma in situ: genetic and environmental aspects
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 303 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
C Roger, S Lambard, A Bouskine, B Mograbi, D Chevallier, M Nebout, G Pointis, S Carreau, and P Fenichel
Estrogen-induced growth inhibition of human seminoma cells expressing estrogen receptor {beta} and aromatase
J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 35(1): 191 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. E. Hoei-Hansen, J. E. Nielsen, K. Almstrup, S. B. Sonne, N. Graem, N. E. Skakkebaek, H. Leffers, and E. R.-D. Meyts
Transcription Factor AP-2{gamma} Is a Developmentally Regulated Marker of Testicular Carcinoma In situ and Germ Cell Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8521 - 8530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. M. Selva, O. M. Tirado, N. Toran, C. A. Suarez-Quian, J. Reventos, and F. Munell
Estrogen Receptor {beta} Expression and Apoptosis of Spermatocytes of Mice Overexpressing a Rat Androgen-Binding Protein Transgene
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1461 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Wang, R. Thuillier, and M. Culty
Prenatal Estrogen Exposure Differentially Affects Estrogen Receptor-Associated Proteins in Rat Testis Gonocytes
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1652 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. J. Hirvonen-Santti, V. Sriraman, M. Anttonen, S. Savolainen, J. J. Palvimo, M. Heikinheimo, J. S. Richards, and O. A. Janne
Small Nuclear RING Finger Protein Expression during Gonad Development: Regulation by Gonadotropins and Estrogen in the Postnatal Ovary
Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2433 - 2444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]