| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Article |
Department of Pediatrics (Y.v.P., A.H.-K.), Division of Endocrinology, Sophia Childrens Hospital/Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GJ Rotterdam; Institute of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (P.M.), Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GJ Rotterdam; Academic Hospital of Free University (M.H.), 1081 HV Amsterdam; Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital (M.J.), 3584 EA Utrecht; Juliana Childrens Hospital (M.R.), 2566 MJ The Hague, The Netherlands
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Y. K. van Pareren, M.D., Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Sophia Childrens Hospital, Dr. Molewaterplein 60, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: vanpareren{at}zonnet.nl.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Failure to show sufficient catch-up growth in childhood is a known phenomenon in about 1015% of children born small for gestational age (SGA) (5, 6). Several studies (7, 8) have shown accelerated growth during GH treatment. However, it has been established that GH treatment increases postprandial insulin levels, probably because of a reduction in insulin sensitivity (9). This finding has instigated several authors to express their concern regarding long-term effects of GH treatment in predisposed individuals such as SGA children (10).
We previously reported on the effect of 6 yr of GH treatment on carbohydrate metabolism, BP, and serum lipid levels in children born SGA (11, 12). The present article focuses on the effect of discontinuation of long-term GH treatment on carbohydrate metabolism, BP, and serum lipid levels in children born SGA.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study group comprised 47 children born SGA who were examined 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment. Thirty children had an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 6 months after discontinuation of GH. They had participated in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, dose-response GH trial in prepubertal short children born SGA. Four children who had discontinued GH treatment did not agree to an examination 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment and 28 were still receiving GH treatment.
The ongoing dose-response trial evaluates the effect of two dosages of GH (3 or 6 IU GH/m2 BSA/day; approximately 0.03 or 0.07 mg/kg body weight/day) on long-term growth and ultimately on final height.
Inclusion criteria for the dose-response trial were described previously (7). In short, the children were included when prepubertal with a birth length SD score and height SD score below -1.88, without spontaneous catch-up growth and without growth failure caused by other disorders. Patients with Silver-Russell syndrome and GH deficiency (GHD), however, were included in this dose-response trial. The Ethics Committees of the four participating centers in The Netherlands approved the dose-response trial. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or custodians of each child.
Dose-response trial design
After stratification for chronological age (CA) and for spontaneous GH secretion during a 24-h GH profile, all children were randomly and blindly assigned to either one of two GH dosage groups: group A, 3 IU/m2 body surface/day, or group B, 6 IU/m2 body surface/day (
0.03 or 0.07 mg/kg·d, respectively) (7, 13). Biosynthetic GH (recombinant human GH Norditropin; Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) was given sc once daily. To ensure the double-blind design, an equal volume of a reconstituted preparation was used. GH treatment was discontinued after either reaching final height, defined as a height velocity less than 0.5 cm over the last 6 months and/or bone age 15 yr or more for girls and 16.5 yr or more for boys, or on the decision of the patient because of satisfaction with near final height.
Physical examination
Every 3 months one physician (19911995, W.d.W.; 19951998, T.S.; 19982001, Y.v.P.) visited all children and measured height (14) and weight. Height was expressed as SD score for chronological age (CA) (height SD score) (15). Body mass index (BMI) was expressed as SD score for sex and CA using Dutch references (15). Every 6 months BP was measured. Systolic and diastolic BP were determined by the same Dynamap Critikon 1846SX (Southern Medical Corp.) with the children in sitting position using a cuff size corresponding to the size of their arm. BP was expressed as SD score, using age- and sex-specific reference values (16). Pubertal stage was assessed by the same investigators according to Tanner (17), using an orchidometer in boys.
Biochemical parameters
At the start, after 1 and 6 years of GH treatment, all children underwent an OGTT as previously described by Sas et al. (11). For the present study, we performed an OGTT 6 months after GH treatment in three of the four participating centers. To evaluate the overall responses to the oral glucose load, the following variables were described: 1) Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) was defined according to the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (18): the 120-min level greater than 7.8 mmol/liter (140 mg/dl) and less than 11.1 mmol/liter (200 mg/dl); 2) the 120-min area under the curve for time concentration (AUC) during the OGTT was calculated using the trapezoidal rule; and 3) the ratio insulin to glucose at 30 min (30-min ratio) and the ratio at 120 min (120-min ratio) was calculated as an index for relative insulin resistance. Results were compared with the data of 24 normal adolescent girls aged 14.7 (0.98) yr and body mass index (BMI) 20.5 (2.0) kg/m2, selected on the basis of postpubertal stage (Tanner breast stage V) as described by Potau et al. (19) (control group).
At start, during the dose-response trial and at 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment, additional nonfasting blood samples were taken for determination of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, total serum cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c). The atherogenic index was calculated as the ratio of TC to HDL-c. After centrifugation, all samples were frozen (-20 C) until assayed. Serum TC, LDL-c, HDL-c levels, and atherogenic index were compared with a Dutch control group of the same age (20).
Assays
The plasma glucose level was measured at the local hospital laboratories with automatic analyzers using a hexokinase-catalyzed glucose oxidase method. Plasma insulin was determined in one laboratory by RIA (Medgenix, Fleurus, Belgium). The intraassay coefficient of variation (CV) was 610% and the interassay CV was 611%. Fasting normal range was less than 20 mU/liter. Control samples were measured by a RIA, comparable with the RIA we used (R2 = 0.988; y = 0.397 + 0.925 x x) (19).
HbA1c levels were measured in one laboratory using an automatic HPLC analyzer (DIAMAT; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Edgemont, CA). The upper-normal assay limit is 6.6%.
The TC level was measured using an automated enzymatic method (21) with the CHOD-PAP high performance reagent kit (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). TC analysis was subject to the quality assessment program of the World Health Organization Regional Lipid Reference Center (Prague, Czech Republic). HDL-c and LDL-c were measured by the same method after precipitation. For HDL-c, the phosphotungstate method of Burstein was modified (22). LDL-c precipitation was performed with polyvinyl sulfate (Boehringer). The overall CV for TC, HDL-c, and LDL-c was 2.9%, 3.7%, and 5.8%, respectively. Lipid levels for the control group were measured by the same assays in the same laboratory (20). Except for plasma glucose, all determinations were performed in the same laboratories.
Statistical analyses
To maintain the double-blind design until all participants reached final height, an independent statistician (P.M.) performed the statistical analyses and summarized the results per treatment group in such a way that it was impossible for the investigator to identify individual patients. Accordingly, data are expressed as mean (SD) values unless otherwise specified. For the 30-min ratio, the 120-min ratio, and the atherogenic index, the geometric mean (95% range: the back-transformed ± 2 SD range of the log transformed variable) was used because of the positively skewed distributions involved. Differences in continuous variables were tested by paired Students t tests. Differences between zero and SD score values at various time points during the study were tested by one-sample Students t tests. Differences between groups were tested using a two-sample Students t test unless otherwise specified. Correlations were estimated after adjustment for GH dosage. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. All calculations were performed using SPSS version 9.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
After 6 yr of GH treatment, we found IGT in 1 of 27 children (4%), and at 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment, IGT was present in 3 of 29 children (10%). One of the children with IGT at 6 yr of GH treatment also had IGT at 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment. The other children had IGT only once during GH treatment or after discontinuation of GH treatment. None of the children developed DM type 1 or 2.
The HbA1c values after 6 yr of GH treatment had significantly decreased from 5.1 (0.3) before treatment to 4.8 (0.4) at 6 yr of GH treatment (P < 0.001), whereas no change was found 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment [4.7 (0.3)]. Throughout the years, all individual HbA1c levels remained within normal range.
BMI SD score after 6 yr of GH treatment had increased significantly, compared with the pretreatment BMI SD score of -1.0 (1.2) (P < 0.001). As a result, the mean BMI SD score of -0.2 (1.1) at 6 yr was not significantly different from zero. At 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment, mean BMI SD score was -0.1 (1.3), showing no significant difference, compared with 6-yr values. The change in BMI SD score was not significantly different between GH dosage groups.
Systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly during 6 yr of GH treatment (P < 0.05, P < 0.001, respectively) to values not significantly different from zero for systolic BP and significantly lower than zero for diastolic BP (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4
). After discontinuation of GH treatment, no change in systolic and diastolic BP was seen. The changes in BP were not significantly different between GH dosage groups.
|
|
Regarding the change in fasting glucose, fasting insulin, 30-min ratio, 120-min ratio, or AUC for insulin from start until 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment, no correlation was found with the change in BMI-SD score.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previously, we have shown that stimulated glucose levels remained unchanged and fasting glucose levels rose slightly during 6 yr of GH treatment. In addition, both fasting and stimulated insulin levels increased significantly (11). It has been reported that GH treatment increases serum insulin levels in conditions such as GHD, Turner syndrome, and renal diseases (23, 24). This has been attributed to a GH-induced reduction of insulin sensitivity. Also, it has been reported that postprandial glucose levels increase in individuals with a reduced insulin sensitivity (25).
Our present results show that after discontinuation of GH treatment, fasting glucose and fasting insulin levels returned to pretreatment levels. This indicates that the rise in glucose and insulin levels were indeed a result of GH treatment. In other patient groups, such as girls with Turner syndrome and adolescents with and without GHD, similar results were found after discontinuation of GH treatment (24, 26, 27). Although fasting insulin levels at 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment decreased to pretreatment levels, stimulated insulin levels did not. The reason posttreatment-stimulated insulin levels did not completely return to pretreatment levels might have various reasons. First, patients were prepubertal at start and postpubertal after discontinuation of GH treatment. Euglycemic clamp tests or frequently sampling iv glucose tolerance tests have shown that insulin sensitivity in healthy children decreases during puberty. Also, in these studies, postpubertal insulin sensitivity did not return to prepubertal values (19, 28, 29). The higher insulin levels were attributed to a reduced insulin sensitivity in normal puberty and postpuberty (28). Thus, the reduced insulin sensitivity, compared with baseline in our patients, might be explained by their postpubertal stage. This is supported by the fact that posttreatment-stimulated insulin levels were comparable with those of healthy adolescent peers. Second, the BMI SD score increased during GH treatment. Because a higher BMI is associated with higher insulin levels, this might also explain the higher posttreatment-stimulated insulin levels, compared with pretreatment levels (30, 31). In accordance, we found that adolescents with high fasting and stimulated insulin levels after discontinuation of GH treatment had a significantly higher BMI SD score. Third, posttreatment-stimulated insulin levels might be influenced by the fact that these adolescents were born SGA. Significantly higher insulin levels have been found after an oral glucose load in young adults born SGA, compared with normal controls (32, 33).
During the 6 yr of GH treatment, we found no differences between the two GH dosage groups regarding fasting or postprandial glucose and insulin levels. After discontinuation of GH treatment, however, we observed that in the higher GH-dosage group (group B), the decrease in the 30-min ratio for insulin/glucose was significantly less profound than in the lower GH-dosage group (group A). Because the 30-min ratio for insulin/glucose is an indicator for insulin resistance, this finding might suggest that long-term treatment with a higher GH dose of 6 IU/m2·d (
0.07 mg/kg·d) increases the degree of insulin resistance in children born SGA even after discontinuation of GH treatment. Compared with the control group, however, the mean 30-min ratio of group B still falls into the normal range.
Because insulin resistance, either on its own or in combination with ß-cell dysfunction, causes IGT, we evaluated the number of children in our group with IGT. We found that after 6 yr of GH treatment, 1 of 27 children (4%) had IGT, and at 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment, IGT was present in 3 of 29 children (10%). This result might be explained by the fact that puberty induces higher 120-min glucose levels (28, 29). The predisposition for insulin resistance and IGT in this group of adolescents born SGA, however, might also be responsible. Several studies found evidence for insulin resistance in untreated short children born SGA (34, 35). Also, being born with a LBW is associated with IGT and DM type 2 (3, 36). On the other hand, mean glucose levels at 6 months after discontinuation of GH decreased to pretreatment levels, individual HbA1c levels never exceeded the normal range, and none of the children developed DM type 1 or 2.
Systolic and diastolic BP did not change after discontinuation of GH treatment. Another study evaluating the effect of discontinuation of GH in adolescents with GHD showed similar results (37). It has been reported that children and young adults born with a LBW had a significantly higher systolic BP (38, 39, 40, 41). In some studies this relationship was also found when LBW was corrected for gestational age (41), but in others it was not (32, 42). We reported, previously, that before start of GH treatment, children born SGA had a significantly higher systolic BP than reference values, which decreased to normal during GH treatment (11). Our present study shows that after discontinuation of GH treatment, systolic BP was not different to age- and sex-matched reference values, whereas diastolic BP was even significantly lower than reference values. These results contrast with data of untreated subjects born SGA and might reflect a positive influence of GH on blood pressure in this patient group.
During GH treatment serum TC, LDL-c, and HDL-c levels decreased. Discontinuation of GH treatment resulted in a slight increase in both LDL-c and HDL-c levels and no change in total cholesterol levels. Previous reports have shown that discontinuation of GH treatment in adolescents with GHD resulted in either no effect on serum lipids (43) or an increase in TC and LDL-c levels, without change in HDL-c levels (37, 44). The increase in both LDL-c and HDL-c in our children might also be an age effect (45, 46). We found that the atherogenic index after discontinuation of GH treatment was comparable with a control group of similar age. The lack of difference in serum lipid levels between the two GH dosage groups suggests that the changes in lipid levels were not related to GH treatment.
After discontinuation of GH treatment, we found a positive correlation among the atherogenic index, BMI SD score, systolic and diastolic BP SD score, and fasting insulin level. This might suggest that in some adolescents born SGA, a clustering of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, as described by Barker (4), is already present. A recent epidemiological study, however, reported that an increased risk for hypertension was mostly present in overweight young SGA adults (47). Therefore, a possible strategy to prevent an increased risk for cardiovascular disease in subjects born SGA might be to prevent overweight.
In conclusion, in children born SGA, the GH-induced insulin insensitivity disappeared after discontinuation of GH, even after long-term GH treatment. Furthermore, the beneficial effect of GH on BP was not changed by discontinuation of GH. Although most children had normal serum lipid levels, we did find a clustering of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, which may point to their predisposition. Whether long-term GH treatment will contribute to longevity, however, remains to be investigated.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Abbreviations: 30-min ratio, Ratio of insulin to glucose at 30 min; 120-min ratio, ratio of insulin to glucose at 120 min; AUC, area under the curve for time concentration; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CA, chronological age; CV, coefficient of variation; DM, diabetes mellitus; FH, full height; GHD, GH deficiency; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; LBW, low birth weight; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; SGA, small for gestational age; TC, total serum cholesterol.
Received March 22, 2002.
Accepted September 13, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H. Willemsen, S. P. Willemsen, and A. C. S. Hokken-Koelega Longitudinal Changes in Insulin Sensitivity and Body Composition of Small-For-Gestational-Age Adolescents after Cessation of Growth Hormone Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3449 - 3454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Willemsen, S. W. K. de Kort, D. C. M. van der Kaay, and A. C. S. Hokken-Koelega Independent Effects of Prematurity on Metabolic and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Short Small-for-Gestational-Age Children J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2008; 93(2): 452 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Karlberg, H. Jalanko, and M. Lipsanen-Nyman Growth and Growth Hormone Therapy in Subjects With Mulibrey Nanism Pediatrics, July 1, 2007; 120(1): e102 - e111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Saenger, P. Czernichow, I. Hughes, and E. O. Reiter Small for Gestational Age: Short Stature and Beyond Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2007; 28(2): 219 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Willemsen, M. van Dijk, Y. B. de Rijke, A. W. van Toorenenbergen, P. G. Mulder, and A. C. Hokken-Koelega Effect of Growth Hormone Therapy on Serum Adiponectin and Resistin Levels in Short, Small-for-Gestational-Age Children and Associations with Cardiovascular Risk Parameters J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 117 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van Dijk, E. M. N. Bannink, Y. K. van Pareren, P. G. H. Mulder, and A. C. S. Hokken-Koelega Risk Factors for Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Metabolic Syndrome Are Comparable for Previously Growth Hormone-Treated Young Adults Born Small for Gestational Age (SGA) and Untreated Short SGA Controls J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 160 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bridges New indications for growth hormone Arch. Dis. Child. Ed. Pract., June 1, 2005; 90(1): ep7 - ep9. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ibanez, A. Fucci, C. Valls, K. Ong, D. Dunger, and F. de Zegher Neutrophil Count in Small-for-Gestational Age Children: Contrasting Effects of Metformin and Growth Hormone Therapy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3435 - 3439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J.T. Arends, V. H. Boonstra, and A. C.S. Hokken-Koelega Head Circumference and Body Proportions Before and During Growth Hormone Treatment in Short Children Who Were Born Small for Gestational Age Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 683 - 690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L B Johnston and M O Savage Should recombinant human growth hormone therapy be used in short small for gestational age children? Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2004; 89(8): 740 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fjellestad-Paulsen, D. Simon, and P. Czernichow Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age and Treated with Growth Hormone for Three Years Have an Important Catch-Down Five Years after Discontinuation of Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1234 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |