help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aeschbach, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aeschbach, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, T. A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 88, No. 1 26-30
Copyright © 2003 by The Endocrine Society


Special Feature

A Longer Biological Night in Long Sleepers Than in Short Sleepers

Daniel Aeschbach, Leo Sher, Teodor T. Postolache, Jeffery R. Matthews, Michael A. Jackson and Thomas A. Wehr

Section on Biological Rhythms, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program (T.T.P., M.A.J., T.A.W.), National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine (D.A.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Department of Psychiatry (L.S.), Columbia University, New York, New York 10032; and Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior (J.R.M.), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0189

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Daniel Aeschbach, Ph.D., Division of Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail: daeschbach{at}hms.harvard.edu.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Habitual sleep duration varies greatly among individuals. The physiological basis of this variation is unknown. We sought to determine whether individual differences in sleep duration are associated with systematic differences in the duration of the biological night that is programmed by the circadian pacemaker and reflected in the nocturnal interval of circadian rhythms in neuroendocrine function, body temperature, and arousal. Ten young, healthy long sleepers (sleep duration >9 h) and 14 short sleepers (<6 h) were studied under constant environmental conditions and in the absence of sleep. The nocturnal intervals of high plasma melatonin levels, increasing cortisol levels, low body temperature, and increasing sleepiness were longer in long sleepers than in short sleepers. The maxima in cortisol and sleepiness exhibited a close relationship to habitual wake-up time, which occurred approximately 2.5 h later in long sleepers than in short sleepers. It is concluded that the circadian pacemaker programs a longer biological night in long sleepers than in short sleepers. We propose that individual differences in the circadian pacemaker’s program may contribute to the variability of sleep duration in the general population. The persistence or inertia of an individual’s circadian program, as was evident in constant conditions, may underlie the commonly experienced difficulty of changing habitual sleep duration willfully.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
HABITUAL SLEEP DURATION exhibits great disparity among individuals (1, 2). Although the average sleep duration in the adult population is approximately 7.5 h, a SD of approximately 1 h has been reported (1, 3). It has long been hypothesized that an individual’s habitual sleep duration has a physiological basis. However, differences between long sleepers and short sleepers in a sleep-regulatory system have never been identified.

The duration and timing of sleep are regulated by an interaction between the circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, which programs daily cycles in sleep propensity, and the sleep homeostat, which tracks the increase of sleep pressure (i.e. sleep debt) during waking and its decrease during sleep (4, 5, 6, 7). Conceivably, either one of these regulatory systems might differ among individuals. Recently, quantitative analyses of the electroencephalogram during sleep and wakefulness indicated that although natural short sleepers (habitual sleep duration <6 h) manage to live under higher sleep pressure, they do not differ from long sleepers (>9 h) with regard to the kinetics of the sleep-wake dependent variations in sleep pressure (8, 9).

Given that the sleep homeostat appears to operate normally in long sleepers and short sleepers, we hypothesized that the temporal program of the circadian pacemaker may be different in the two groups. The circadian pacemaker programs the daily cyclic changes in the body’s internal milieu, thereby creating a biological day and biological night (10, 11, 12). The two intervals are delimited by relatively abrupt changes in neuroendocrine function, body temperature, and arousal (10) that appear to result from abrupt changes in the firing rate of cells in the SCN (13, 14). During the biological night, melatonin is secreted, cortisol concentration in the blood increases, core body temperature is lowered, and sleepiness and sleep propensity increase (6, 10, 11, 12). We hypothesized that the duration of the biological night that is programmed by the circadian pacemaker is longer in long sleepers than short sleepers. To allow for an unmasked measurement of the biological night, we subjected young, healthy long sleepers and short sleepers to a constant routine (CR) protocol (15) and measured the duration of the nocturnal interval of the circadian rhythms in plasma melatonin, plasma cortisol, core body temperature, and subjective sleepiness.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

Ten long sleepers (20–30 yr; five women and five men) who habitually slept more than 9 h, and 14 short sleepers (21–34 yr; eight women and six men) who habitually slept less than 6 h were studied. Subjects were recruited over a period of 3.5 yr through newspaper and radio advertisements in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area. Two- to four-week sleep logs and wrist motor activity recordings were used to identify individuals who met the criteria. Special attention was paid to the weekends: Individuals who slept less than 6 h on average but more than 7 h on weekends were excluded because we suspected that their weekdays’ sleep duration deviated from their natural sleep need. Subjects reported that their habitual sleep duration had not changed within 1 yr before the study. They reported no sleep problems or shift work and no use of medications, drugs, or tobacco. The reported daily consumption of caffeinated beverages (coffee, tea, cola) did not differ (t test) between long sleepers (mean ± SEM, 1.1 ± 0.5) and short sleepers (1.3 ± 0.4). Subjects were in good health as determined by medical history, structured clinical interview, physical exam, blood and urine tests, electrocardiography, and all-night polysomnography. Subjects were free of any current or past Axis I psychiatric disorder. There were no significant differences (t tests) between groups in plasma glucose levels (long sleepers vs. short sleepers: 93.1 ± 1.4 vs. 91.6 ± 4.4 mg/dl), total cholesterol (158.4 ± 5.5 vs. 150.1 ± 10.0 mg/dl), systolic (114.2 ± 3.8 vs. 116.6 ± 4.2 mm Hg), and diastolic blood pressure (63.2 ± 3.44 vs. 66.8 ± 2.6 mm Hg).

All-night polysomnography showed that subjects had fewer than two 10-sec apneas per hour of sleep (long sleepers vs. short sleepers: 0.37 ± 0.15 vs. 0.26 ± 0.13, n.s., t test) and fewer than 11 periodic leg movements per hour of sleep (1.45 ± 0.42 vs. 2.22 ± 0.91, n.s.). Women reported no current use of oral contraceptives. They were studied during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle as determined by ovulation kits and logs. For 1 wk before the study, subjects were asked to refrain from alcohol and caffeinated products and maintain their habitual bed times and wake-up times. Compliance to the latter instruction was checked with wrist-worn light/activity monitors (Actillume, Ambulatory Monitoring, Ardsley, NY). The average duration of the solar day during the month before the study did not differ (t test) between long sleepers (12.62 ± 0.64 h) and short sleepers (12.38 ± 0.36 h).

Subjects gave written informed consent for their participation in the study. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Mental Health.

Protocol

Subjects were admitted to a research ward for 2 nights of sleep, an approximately 40-h CR protocol, and a period for recovery sleep. The first 2 nights were scheduled to match each individual’s average weekday bed time and wake-up time that were derived from the sleep logs and activity recordings. On average, time in bed was from 2312 h ± 14 min (SEM) to 0859 h ± 19 min in the long sleepers and from 0100 h ± 16 min to 0623 h ± 13 min in the short sleepers. Total sleep time as determined by polysomnography (16) in the second night’s sleep was 8.62 ± 0.25 h in the long sleepers and 4.98 ± 0.19 h in the short sleepers. The CR protocol began after the second night’s sleep and ended at 2300 h on the following day. During this time, subjects stayed awake in bed in a propped-up position in dim light (<10 lux) without having access to clocks. Fluids and isocaloric meals were given at room temperature every hour and every 2 h, respectively. A staff member attended the subjects continuously to prevent them from falling asleep and ensure adherence to the protocol. The purpose of the CR protocol was to minimize or distribute evenly over time the masking influences of sleep, posture, light, and meals on the circadian rhythms.

Data collection

Blood samples were collected through an indwelling iv catheter at half-hourly intervals for 24 h (1400–1400 h) during the CR. Plasma melatonin concentrations were measured with a RIA that had a detection limit of 2.8 pg/ml (Stockgrand, Surrey, UK). The intraassay coefficients of variation were 7.2% (n = 10), 5.6% (n = 10), 6.2% (n = 10), and 4.5% (n = 10) at means of 22, 35, 50, and 203 pg/ml, respectively, and the interassay coefficient of variation were 11.8% (n = 10), 7.6% (n = 10), 8.5% (n = 10), and 3.8% (n = 10) at means of 22, 34, 50, and 205 pg/ml, respectively. Plasma cortisol concentrations were measured with a RIA that had a detection limit of 0.5 µg/dl (Covance Laboratories, Inc., Vienna, VA). The intraassay coefficients of variation were 8.4% (n = 10), 5.3% (n = 10), and 11.1% (n = 10) at means of 5.01, 19.21, and 33.05 µg/dl, respectively, and the interassay coefficients of variation were 9.1% (n = 10), 8.9% (n = 10), and 11.5% (n = 10) at means of 4.83, 19.18, and 35.69 µg/dl, respectively.

Core body temperature was recorded at 1-min intervals with an indwelling rectal probe that was connected to an electronic thermometer (Iso-thermex, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). After exclusion of visually identified artifacts, the data were averaged to yield half-hourly values.

Subjective sleepiness was assessed half-hourly with bipolar 100-mm visual analog scales.

Data analysis

The nocturnal interval of high plasma melatonin levels was defined in each individual as the interval between the onset of secretion of melatonin and its disappearance from the plasma. Onset was defined as the half-way point between the last undetectable and first detectable plasma concentration. Disappearance was defined as the half-way point between the last detectable and first undetectable concentration.

The nocturnal interval of increasing plasma cortisol levels was defined as the interval between the minimum and maximum that was identified after subjecting the cortisol time series to a two-time 5-point moving average.

The nocturnal interval of low body temperature was defined as the interval between the two midrange crossing points of the smoothed (5-point moving average) temperature data. The midrange was defined as the half-way point between the maximum during the first 24 h of the CR and the nocturnal minimum.

The nocturnal interval of increasing sleepiness was determined as follows. In each subject, a function that represents the sum of a linear component and two cosine components with periods of 24 h and 12 h (17) was fitted to the smoothed (two-time 5-point moving average) half-hourly sleepiness rating (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Next, the linear component that was introduced to approximate the wake-dependent increase in sleepiness was subtracted from the smoothed data. Two points were determined in the resulting time series: the maximum, and last local minimum before the maximum that remained within or below the range of all local daytime (i.e. before 2400 h) minima. The nocturnal interval of increasing sleepiness was then defined as the interval between the last local minimum and the maximum.

Statistics

Based on our knowledge that long sleepers go to sleep earlier and arise later than short sleepers, we hypothesized that in the former the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal intervals begin earlier and end later. Therefore, one-tailed unpaired t tests were used to compare between groups onset time, offset time, and duration of these intervals. If the variances within the two groups were unequal, an approximate t statistic that was based on the Satterthwaite’s approximation for the degrees of freedom was used. The phase relationship between habitual bed time and onset of the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal intervals and between habitual wake-up time and offset of the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal intervals were analyzed with two-tailed paired and unpaired t tests.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The nocturnal interval of high plasma melatonin levels (Fig. 1Go, top) was longer (P = 0.024) in long sleepers than in short sleepers. The amplitude of melatonin secretion as measured by the maximum of the smoothed (5-point moving average) time series did not differ (P > 0.15, two-tailed t test) between long sleepers (63.3 ± 8.0 pg/ml) and short sleepers (50.5 ± 4.6 pg/ml). The duration of the nocturnal interval of high melatonin levels did not correlate with the amplitude of melatonin secretion (long sleepers: r = 0.27, P > 0.4, n = 9; short sleepers: r = 0.02, P > 0.9, n = 13; pooled: r = 0.20, P > 0.3, n = 22). The difference between groups in the duration of the nocturnal interval of high plasma melatonin levels remained statistically significant (P = 0.033) after correction for differences in amplitude that was based on the linear regression of the two variables.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean (SEM) 24-h profiles of half-hourly levels of plasma melatonin and core body temperature during constant routine protocol. Time series were split and aligned relative to mean times of onset of melatonin secretion and disappearance of melatonin from plasma. Note that subjects did not sleep during this protocol. Habitual bed times and wake-up times (means, 95% confidence intervals) were assessed before study.

 
The nocturnal interval of low body temperature (Fig. 1Go, bottom) was longer (P = 0.028) in long sleepers than in short sleepers. The amplitude of the circadian rhythm of body temperature (i.e. half of the difference between the maximum and minimum of a fitted function that constitutes the sum of two cosine components with periods 24 h and 12 h) did not differ (P > 0.7, two-tailed t test) between long sleepers (0.29 ± 0.01 C) and short sleepers (0.28 ± 0.03 C).

The nocturnal interval of increasing plasma cortisol levels (Fig. 2Go) was longer (P = 0.034) in long sleepers than in short sleepers. In neither group did the timing of the plasma cortisol’s maximum differ from habitual wake-up time (P > 0.4).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Mean (±SEM) 24-h profiles of half-hourly plasma cortisol levels during constant routine protocol. Time series were split and aligned relative to mean times of minimum and maximum of plasma cortisol levels.

 
The nocturnal interval of increasing sleepiness (Fig. 3Go) was longer (P = 0.021) in long sleepers than in short sleepers. In neither group did the timing of the maximum of sleepiness differ from habitual wake-up time (P > 0.4).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean (±SEM) 24-h profiles of half-hourly sleepiness ratings (100-mm visual analog scale) during constant routine protocol. Time series were split and aligned relative to mean times of last minimum before maximum and mean time of maximum of sleepiness ratings.

 
A quantitative synopsis of the nocturnal intervals of the circadian rhythms is shown in Fig. 4Go. The longer duration of the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal intervals in long sleepers than short sleepers was due to a later offset time in the morning (melatonin P = 0.053; other variables P < 0.05) and not due to an earlier onset time in the evening (P > 0.8). The phase angle between the onset of the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal intervals and habitual bed time was larger in the short sleepers than in the long sleepers (sleepiness P = 0.11; other variables P < 0.05). The phase angle between wake-up time and offset of the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal intervals did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.4), except for melatonin, for which it was larger in the short sleepers (P = 0.038).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relationship between habitual time in bed and intervals of increasing sleepiness, increasing plasma cortisol, high plasma melatonin, and low body temperature during constant routine protocol. Bars represent means (SEM). Asterisks indicate earlier onset time or later offset time of intervals in long sleepers (P <= 0.05, t test).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study revealed systematic differences between long sleepers and short sleepers in the temporal organization of neuroendocrine function, body temperature, and arousal. These differences persisted after masking influences of sleep, posture, exercise, meals, and light on these functions were removed. We conclude that the temporal program of the endogenous circadian pacemaker differs between long sleepers and short sleepers such that it encodes a long biological night in the former and a short biological night in the latter.

The waveforms of the circadian rhythm in sleepiness suggest differences between long and short sleepers in the duration of a circadian signal that promotes sleep. Such a signal is thought to originate in the SCN and be transmitted through efferent projections and possibly by output molecules to hypothalamic nuclei implicated in arousal state control (18, 19). The neuroendocrine and temperature variables that we studied may not simply be markers of a circadian signal that promotes sleep but may also be mediators of such a signal. Presence of melatonin in the blood and low core body temperature have previously been associated with increased sleep propensity and sleep consolidation (20, 21, 22, 23). Thus, extended periods of high plasma melatonin levels and low body temperature may directly facilitate long sleep. Moreover, the coincidence of the maximum in plasma cortisol with habitual wake-up time in both groups is consistent with the notion that the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis plays an important role in and even anticipates the sleep-waking transition (24). In this regard, the importance of glucocorticoids in conveying circadian time information from the SCN to peripheral tissues was shown recently (25).

The present data provide a physiological basis for the interindividual variability and the intraindividual stability of habitual sleep duration. The persistence or inertia of a circadian pacemaker’s individual program as was revealed in constant conditions provides a mechanism that stabilizes individual sleep duration. This mechanism is habit promoting and could explain the commonly experienced difficulty of changing habitual sleep duration willfully. From a functional point of view, a built-in mechanism that stabilizes an individual’s sleep duration may serve to prevent deviations from an individual’s sleep need, which appears to have pathophysiological consequences (2, 26).

We cannot from this study determine the origin of the individual differences in the circadian pacemaker’s program. Circadian rhythms arise from autoregulatory transcriptional and translational feedback cycles of clock genes in cells of the SCN (27). It is conceivable that polymorphisms in one or several of these genes result in differences in the duration of the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal interval and thus in the duration of sleep. Studies in both animals (28, 29, 30) and humans (31, 32) suggest a genetic basis for sleep duration. Specifically, decreased sleep duration was recently reported for the mouse Clock mutation (33). Thus, long and short sleepers may represent promising phenotypes for the study of the function of clock genes in human sleep. On the other hand, one needs to keep in mind that in both animals and humans, a circadian pacemaker’s temporal program is not completely rigid and can adjust to chronic changes in the duration of the photoperiod to which the organism has been exposed (10, 11, 34, 35). Although the duration of the solar day before the study did not differ between long sleepers and short sleepers, differences in the exposure to artificial light may have been effective (11). Thus, prolonged exposure to short photoperiods, as occurs when sleep is chronically long, or long photoperiods, as occurs when sleep is chronically short, may contribute to shaping the circadian pacemaker’s program, which in turn could perpetuate a long sleep duration in some individuals and a short sleep duration in others. This possibility may explain the observation that imposed chronic sleep restriction has a long-term effect on habitual sleep duration after the sleep restriction is lifted (36). Hence, although the origin of the differences between long and short sleepers is unknown, the circadian pacemaker appears to be important in mediating and perpetuating such differences.

All four markers of the biological night indicated that its longer duration in the long sleepers was due to a delayed offset in the morning and not an advanced onset in the evening. This asymmetry was not reflected in habitual bed time and wake-up time, which suggests that the two events are controlled by different factors. The observation that short sleepers go to sleep later relative to the onset of the circadian rhythms’ nocturnal interval indicates that their tolerance of the rising circadian pressure to sleep is higher than in long sleepers. This adds to a previous observation that short sleepers tolerate a higher homeostatic sleep pressure than long sleepers (8, 9). Taken together the data indicate that the differences between long and short sleepers in wake-up time are related to differences in the timing of the offset of a circadian signal that promotes sleep, whereas the differences in bed time are related to differences in the tolerance or sensitivity to the circadian and homeostatic drives for sleep. In addition, the decision to go to bed may be influenced by an individual’s use of artificial evening light, which has acute potency to reduce sleepiness (37).

There is an ongoing debate as to how much sleep is enough to avoid adverse effects on health. Recent studies (26) have indicated that subchronic curtailment of sleep has negative effects on carbohydrate metabolism, sympathovagal balance, and evening cortisol concentrations. Chronic sleep loss may therefore contribute to some age-related pathologies, such as diabetes, hypertension, and memory loss. The present study was not designed to test these hypotheses. It is worth noting, however, that the tests during the screening phase of this study did not reveal significant differences between groups in plasma glucose concentration (insulin was not measured), total cholesterol concentration, and blood pressure (see Subjects). Furthermore, during the study there was no difference (P > 0.7) in plasma cortisol concentrations in the evening (1600–2100 h) between long sleepers (4.70 ± 0.55 µg/dl) and short sleepers (5.07 ± 0.75 µg/dl). The observation that the circadian pacemaker appears to facilitate short sleep in some individuals and long sleep in others indicates that sleep need may not be uniform among individuals and therefore it may not be possible to define one healthy sleep duration for an entire population.

In conclusion, we postulate that differences in the circadian pacemaker’s program may contribute to the disparities in sleep duration among individuals. The present results are relevant not only for understanding differences in sleep duration among healthy people but also for indicating possible mechanisms underlying pathological changes in sleep duration, such as occur during mania (shortened sleep) and depression (extended sleep) in patients with manic-depressive illness (38). Finally, the observation of increased melatonin levels in the morning in long sleepers may serve as a potentially useful paradigm for the treatment with melatonin of early morning awakenings, a chief complaint in elderly people (23, 39).


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Frances S. Myers, Catherine H. Lowe, and Kathleen M. Dietrich for help with the subject recruitment; Holly A. Giesen, Charles Bender, Charles Barker, and Sam B. Angura, Jr. for data collection; Christine Kotila (nurse project coordinator) and the 4-West nursing staff for care of the research subjects and assistance with the experimental procedures; Dr. Paul J. Schwartz for advice and help with the physical examinations; and Dr. Wallace C. Duncan, Jr. for comments on the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (Bethesda, MD) and fellowships (to D.A.) from NIH, the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 823A-046619), and the Boral Foundation.

Abbreviations: CR, Constant routine; SCN, suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Received May 29, 2002.

Accepted September 16, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Borbély AA 1984 Schlafgewohnheiten, Schlafqualität und Schlafmittelkonsum der Schweizer Bevölkerung. Ergebnisse einer Representativumfrage. Schweiz Arzteztg 65:1606–1613
  2. Kripke DF, Garfinkel L, Wingard DL, Klauber MR, Marler MR 2002 Mortality associated with sleep duration and insomnia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:131–136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Webb WB 1979 Are short and long sleepers different? Psychol Rep 44:259–264[Medline]
  4. Borbély AA 1982 A two-process model of sleep regulation. Hum Neurobiol 1:195–204[Medline]
  5. Daan S, Beersma DGM, Borbély AA 1984 Timing of human sleep: recovery process gated by a circadian pacemaker. Am J Physiol 246:R161–R178
  6. Dijk DJ, Czeisler CA 1995 Contribution of the circadian pacemaker and the sleep homeostat to sleep propensity, sleep structure, electroencephalographic slow waves and sleep spindle activity in humans. J Neurosci 15:3526–3538[Abstract]
  7. Edgar DM, Dement WC, Fuller CA 1993 Effect of SCN lesions on sleep in squirrel monkeys: evidence for opponent processes in sleep-wake regulation. J Neurosci 13:1065–1079[Abstract]
  8. Aeschbach D, Cajochen C, Landolt HP, Borbély AA 1996 Homeostatic sleep regulation in habitual short sleepers and long sleepers. Am J Physiol 270: R41–R53
  9. Aeschbach D, Postolache TT, Sher L, Matthews JR, Jackson MA, Wehr TA 2001 Evidence from the waking electroencephalogram that short sleepers live under higher homeostatic sleep pressure than long sleepers. Neuroscience 102:493–502[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Wehr TA, Aeschbach D, Duncan Jr WC 2001 Evidence for a biological dawn and dusk in the human circadian timing system. J Physiol (Lond) 535.3:937–951
  11. Wehr TA 1999 The impact of changes in nightlength (scotoperiod) on human sleep. In: Turek FW, Zee PC, eds. Regulation of sleep and circadian rhythms. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.; 263–285
  12. Dijk DJ, Czeisler CA 1994 Paradoxical timing of the circadian rhythm of sleep propensity serves to consolidate sleep and wakefulness in humans. Neurosci Lett 166:63–68[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Moore RY 1996 Neural control of the pineal gland. Behav Brain Res 73:125–130[Medline]
  14. Mrugala M, Zlomanczuk P, Jagota A, Schwartz WJ 2000 Rhythmic multiunit neural activity in slices of hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus reflect prior photoperiod. Am J Physiol 278:R987–R994
  15. Duffy JF, Dijk DJ 2002 Getting through to circadian oscillators: why use constant routines? J Biol Rhythms 17:4–13[Abstract]
  16. Rechtschaffen A, Kales A 1968 A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring systems for sleep stages of human subjects. Bethesda, MD: Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
  17. Cajochen C, Brunner DP, Kräuchi K, Graw P, Wirz-Justice A 2000 EEG and subjective sleepiness during extended wakefulness in seasonal affective disorder: circadian and homeostatic influences. Biol Psychiatry 47:610–617[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Lu J, Zhang Y-H, Chou TC, Gaus SE, Elmquist JK, Shiromani P, Saper CB 2001 Contrasting effects of ibotenate lesions of the paraventricular nucleus and subparaventricular zone on sleep-wake cycle and temperature regulation. J Neurosci 21:4864–4874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cheng MY, Bullock CM, Li C, Lee AG, Bermak JC, Beluzzi J, Weaver DR, Leslie FM, Zhou QY 2002 Prokineticin 2 transmits the behavioural circadian rhythm of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nature 417:405–410[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Dollins AB, Zhdanova IV, Wurtman RJ, Lynch HJ, Deng MH 1994 Effect of inducing nocturnal serum melatonin concentrations in daytime on sleep, mood, body temperature, and performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:1824–1828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Tzischinsky O, Lavie P 1994 Melatonin possesses time-dependent hypnotic effects. Sleep 17:638–645[Medline]
  22. Hughes RJ, Badia P 1997 Sleep-promoting and hypothermic effects of daytime melatonin administration in humans. Sleep 20:124–131[Medline]
  23. Dijk DJ, Duffy JF, Riel E, Shanahan TL, Czeisler CA 1999 Ageing and the circadian and homeostatic regulation of human sleep during forced desynchrony of rest, melatonin and temperature rhythms. J Physiol (Lond) 516: 611–627
  24. Born J, Hansen K, Marshall L, Mölle M, Fehm HL 1999 Timing the end of nocturnal sleep. Nature 397:29–30[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Balsalobre A, Brown SA, Marcacci L, Tronche F, Kellendonk C, Reichardt HM, Schütz G, Schibler U 2000 Resetting of circadian time in peripheral tissues by glucocorticoid signaling. Science 289:2344–2347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Spiegel K, Leproult R, Van Cauter E 1999 Impact of sleep debt on metabolic and endocrine function. Lancet 354:1435–1439[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Reppert SM, Weaver DR 2001 Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Physiol 63:647–676[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Valatx JL, Bugat R, Jouvet M 1972 Genetic studies of sleep in mice. Nature 238:226–227[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Franken P, Malafosse A, Tafti M 1999 Genetic determinants of sleep regulation in inbred mice. Sleep 22:155–169[Medline]
  30. Tafti M, Chollet D, Valatx JL, Franken P 1999 Quantitative trait loci approach of the genetics of sleep in recombinant inbred mice. J Sleep Res 8(Suppl 1):37–43
  31. Partinen M, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Putkonen P, Langinvainio H 1983 Genetic and environmental determination of human sleep. Sleep 6:179–185[Medline]
  32. Heath AC, Kendler KS, Eaves LJ, Martin NG 1990 Evidence for genetic influences on sleep disturbance and sleep pattern in twins. Sleep 13:318–335[Medline]
  33. Naylor E, Bergmann BM, Krauski K, Zee PC, Takahashi JS, Vitaterna MH, Turek FW 2000 The circadian Clock mutation alters sleep homeostasis in the mouse. J Neurosci 20:8138–8143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Illnerová H, Hoffmann K, Vanecek J 1984 Adjustment of pineal melatonin and N-acetyltransferase rhythms to change from long to short photoperiod in the Djungarian hamster Phodopus sungorus. Neuroendocrinology 38:226–231[Medline]
  35. Pittendrigh CS 1988 The photoperiodic phenomena: seasonal modulation of the ‘day within.’ J Biol Rhythms 3:173–188
  36. Mullaney DJ, Johnson LC, Naitoh P, Friedmann JK, Globus GG 1977 Sleep during and after gradual sleep reduction. Psychophysiology 14:237–244[Medline]
  37. Cajochen C, Zeitzer JM, Czeisler CA, Dijk DJ 2000 Dose-response relationship for light intensity and ocular and electroencephalographic correlates of human alertness. Behav Brain Res 155:75–83
  38. Wehr TA, Turner EH, Shimada JM, Lowe CH, Barker C, Leibenluft E 1998 Treatment of a rapidly cycling bipolar patient by using extended bed rest and darkness to stabilize the timing and duration of sleep. Biol Psychiatry 43: 822–828
  39. Duffy JF, Dijk DJ, Klerman EB, Czeisler CA 1998 Later endogenous circadian temperature nadir relative to an earlier wake time in older people. Am J Physiol 275:R1478–R1487



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
O. G. Jenni, L. Molinari, J. A. Caflisch, and R. H. Largo
Sleep Duration From Ages 1 to 10 Years: Variability and Stability in Comparison With Growth
Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e769 - e776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. P. Pinheiro, E. S. Schernhammer, S. S. Tworoger, and K. B. Michels
A prospective study on habitual duration of sleep and incidence of breast cancer in a large cohort of women.
Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5521 - 5525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. K. Verkasalo, K. Lillberg, R. G. Stevens, C. Hublin, M. Partinen, M. Koskenvuo, and J. Kaprio
Sleep Duration and Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9595 - 9600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biol RhythmsHome page
D.-J. Dijk and M. von Schantz
Timing and Consolidation of Human Sleep, Wakefulness, and Performance by a Symphony of Oscillators
J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2005; 20(4): 279 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
L. Sher
Type D personality: the heart, stress, and cortisol
QJM, May 1, 2005; 98(5): 323 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
O. G. Jenni and B. B. O'Connor
Children's Sleep: An Interplay Between Culture and Biology
Pediatrics, January 1, 2005; 115(1/S1): 204 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. M. W Rajaratnam, B. Middleton, B. M Stone, J. Arendt, and D.-J. Dijk
Melatonin advances the circadian timing of EEG sleep and directly facilitates sleep without altering its duration in extended sleep opportunities in humans
J. Physiol., November 15, 2004; 561(1): 339 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. Wilkoff, O. G. Jenni, I. Iglowstein, L. Molinari, and R. H. Largo
Sleep Need in Children
Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1463 - 1464.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. A. Rivkees
Time to Wake-Up to the Individual Variation in Sleep Needs
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 24 - 25.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aeschbach, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aeschbach, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wehr, T. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals