help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vagenakis, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vagenakis, A. G.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 7 3169-3173
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Endocrine Care

Growth Retardation in Artistic Compared with Rhythmic Elite Female Gymnasts

Neoklis A. Georgopoulos, Kostas B. Markou, Anastasia Theodoropoulou, Dan Benardot, Michel Leglise and Apostolos G. Vagenakis

Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology (N.A.G., K.B.M., A.T., A.G.V.), University of Patras Medical School, University Hospital, Patras, 26500 Greece; College of Health and Human Sciences (D.B.), Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303; International Federation of Gymnastics Medical Committee (K.B.M., M.L.), CH-100 Lausanne, Switzerland; and International Olympic Committee-Medical Committee (M.L.), CH-100 Lausanne, Switzerland

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Apostolos G. Vagenakis, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Patras Medical School, University Hospital, Patras, 26500 Greece. E-mail: . Vag.inmd{at}med.upatras.gr

Abstract

We studied 129 female rhythmic gymnasts (RG) and 142 female artistic gymnasts (AG) who participated in the 1999 Gymnastics World Championship for RG in Osaka, Japan, and the 1999 and 2001 Gymnastics World Championships for AG in Tianjin, China (n = 48), and Ghent, Belgium (n = 94), respectively.

RG were taller than average, with a mean height SD score above the 50th percentile, whereas AG were relatively short, with a mean height SD score below the 50th percentile. Both RG and AG followed their respective reported target height SD score, which was above the 50th percentile for the RG and below the 50th percentile for the AG. The RG followed a growth pattern that was higher than their reported target height, whereas AG exhibited a negative growth pattern. RG and AG weighed less than the population mean, with the mean weight for age below the 50th percentile for both groups. RG were taller than AG (t = 17.15; P < 0.001), with a higher reported target height SD score (t = 6.44; P < 0.001), a greater {Delta} height-reported target height (t = 2.74; P < 0.001), and a lower mean body fat (t = -11.83; P < 0.001) and body mass index (t = -10.73; P < 0.001) than AG. AG started their training at an earlier age than RG (t = 4.13; P < 0.001). Using multiple regression analysis, actual height SD score was independently influenced positively by weight SD score for both RG (b = 0.421; t = 4.317; P < 0.001) and AG (b = 1.404; t = 16.514; P = <0.001), and by reported target height only for RG (b = 0.299; t = 3.139; P = 0.002), and negatively by body mass index only for AG (b = -0.80; t = -9.88; P < 0.001).

In conclusion, in elite female AG, a deterioration of growth potential was observed, whereas in RG the genetic predisposition to growth was preserved.

BEGINNING AT A young age, rhythmic gymnasts (RG) and artistic gymnasts (AG) performing at a high agonistic level are exposed to high levels of physical and psychological stress from many hours of intense athletic training and competitions. The detrimental effects of these factors on growth, skeletal maturation, and pubertal development have been documented in individuals involved in a variety of sports (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Individual sports impart unique influences on biological maturation that are related to the heterogeneity of the sport-specific demands of training and the stage of growth and sexual maturation of the individual athlete.

RG and AG participate in two distinct sports within the area of gymnastics. Their programs include specific gymnastics and require specific and different skills. In AG, although anthropometric measurements and prospective growth predictions appear within normal limits (6, 7, 8, 9), a decrease in mean height predictions with time has been observed that could ultimately result in lower final adult height (10). We have previously reported that stress and physical training have profound effects on growth and pubertal development of elite female RG (11). Despite the observed significant delay in both skeletal maturation and pubertal development, the same athlete group of elite RG after a longitudinal follow-up was shown to compensate the loss of pubertal growth spurt by a late acceleration of linear growth. Despite the delay in skeletal maturation, genetic predisposition of growth was not only preserved, but even exceeded (12).

The aim of the present study was to compare somatometric data of RG and AG of high agonistic level and determine the impact of their gymnastics participation on growth. This study is unique in character, because all variables were measured on the field of competition.

Subjects and Methods

Data for this study were obtained during the 1999 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championships in Osaka, Japan (n = 129), and the 1999 and 2001 Artistic Gymnastics World Championships in Tianjin, China (n = 48), and Ghent, Belgium (n = 94), respectively. The study was conducted under the authorization of the International Federation of Gymnastics and the European Union of Gymnastics. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with Article 7 of the medical organization of the official International Federation of Gymnastics competitions. The Medical Authority of the International Federation of Gymnastics is authorized to function as an institutional review board for human research subjects. All athletes participated voluntarily under the authorization of the heads of their national delegations. The study included 129 elite RG and 142 elite AG, aged 11–23 yr, from 28 countries that represented all continents. Data concerning RG obtained from different populations have been reported recently (11).

The study protocol has been published elsewhere (11, 12). Briefly, it included noninvasive clinical and laboratory investigations and the completion of a questionnaire. The clinical evaluation included height and weight measurements and assessment of breast and pubic hair development according to Tanner’s stages of pubertal development (13).

The laboratory investigation included determination of body composition by a portable apparatus (Futrex 5000, Futrex, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) that estimates percentage body fat and total body water based on infrared analysis (11, 12, 14). The accuracy and precision of the near infrared analysis has been validated to be equivalent to the standard methods of body composition assessment by skinfold measurements (15) and bioimpedance assessments (16).

All athletes completed a questionnaire that included questions on personal (onset of breast and pubic hair development, age of menarche, onset and intensity of training, number of competitions per year) and family data (paternal and maternal heights, maternal age of menarche). It is to be noted that the athletes knew very well the accurate height of their parents and the data of the onset of their menarche, as well as the year of the maternal and sisters’ menarche. The reported target height (TH) in centimeters was estimated using the midparental height as an index of genetic predisposition to adult height. The equation used for reported TH was: TH = (father’s height - 13 + mother’s height)/2 (1).

Statistical analysis

Height and weight were expressed as the SD score of the mean height and weight for age, according to Tanner’s standards (17). The SD score was also calculated for reported target height. The Pearson product moment correlation coefficient, with two-tailed test of significance, was used to assess all studied relationships. A multiple regression analysis (ANOVA) was used to ascertain the independent predictive value of each parameter proven to be significant according to Pearson correlation coefficient. The independent sample t test, with two-tailed test of statistical significance, was used to assess the power of all relationships within the two groups. Correlations with a critical value of P < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistics were performed using SPSS for Windows, version 9.0.1 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

The age distribution of RG and AG ranged from 11–23 yr. The higher incidence was between 15 and 17 yr (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution according to chronological age.

 
Anthropometric characteristics

The mean values for collected and derived data are shown in Tables 1Go and 2Go, respectively, and the height and weight SD score for each age group is shown in Fig. 2Go. As we reported previously (11, 12), RG were taller than average, with mean height SD score above the 50th percentile, whereas AG were well below the 50th percentile (Fig. 2Go). Both RG and AG followed their respective target height SD score, which was above the 50th percentile for RG and below the 50th percentile for AG (Table 1Go). However, the RG followed a growth pattern that was slightly higher than their reported target height, whereas the AG followed a growth pattern that was lower than their predicted genetic predisposition (Table 2Go). Both RG and AG had low weights compared with the population mean, with the mean weight for age below the 50th percentile for both groups (Fig. 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Demographic, training, and parental weight data of examined RG and AG

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Derived height and weight data of examined RG and AG

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Height SD score and weight SD score for chronological age.

 
Sexual maturation

The distribution of pubertal development according to age, is shown in Fig. 3Go for breast development (Tanner’s stages I–V). The age of first breast and pubic hair development is presented in Table 1Go. Although AG presented pubarche later than RG (see Table 5Go), it is to be noted that both RG and AG follow the same pattern of pubertal development.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Tanner stages of breast development.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Comparative auxologic data between RG (n = 129) and AG (n = 143): correlation coefficients

 
The age of recalled menarche was 15.2 ± 1.4 yr for RG and 15.2 ± 1.2 yr for AG. Concerning RG, 118 athletes responded to the questionnaire, from which 33 (28.65%) had not reached menarche yet. In AG, the number of athletes without menarche reached 34.8% (47 of 135). These differences were not significant ({chi}2 = 1.37) as a whole, as well as when analyzed by age. It should be mentioned that from those without menarche yet, 33 RG and all 47 AG were older than 15 yr of age, so the final age of menarche is anticipated to be even more delayed.

Relationships

Height SD score correlations for RG and AG are presented in Table 3Go.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Height SD score for RG and AG: correlation coefficients

 
A multiple regression analysis was used to ascertain which of the above parameters had independent value in predicting height SD score for both RG and AG (Table 4Go). The actual height SD score was independently influenced positively by weight SD score for both RG (b = 0.39; t = 4.46; P < 0.001) and AG (b = 1.43; t = 21.05; P = <0.001) and by target height (b = 0.33; t = 4.13; P < 0.001) only for RG and negatively by body mass index (BMI) (b = -0.81; t = -12.38; P < 0.001) only for AG.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Actual height for examined RG and AG: multiple regression analysis (ANOVA)

 
All anthropometric, sports-related parameters and growth data of RG and AG were compared, and their correlation coefficients are presented in Table 5Go. Both gymnastics groups were of similar age and of similar age distribution (Fig. 1Go).

RG were taller than AG (t = 16.77; P < 0.001), with a higher reported target height SD score (t = 6.41, P < 0.001), a greater {Delta} height-target height (t = 6.35; P < 0.001), and a lower mean body fat (t = -11.92; P < 0.001) and BMI (t = -10.69; P < 0.001) than AG. AG started training at an earlier age than RG (t = 4.12; P < 0.001).

Discussion

RG and AG exhibit a specific pattern of growth characterized by general similarities, but also striking and important differences. Although both groups had lower weights than the age-related population mean, RG were taller and AG were shorter than the population mean for their respective age groups. It is generally accepted that both sports are characterized by a moderate but significant delay in growth and pubertal development (8, 10, 11, 18).

RG present a reported target height SD score well above the 50th percentile, whereas AG were markedly below the 50th percentile. Both groups are exposed to similar highly intensive training conditions. On the other hand, each sport is characterized by specific athletic requirements that favor a particular optimal somatotype. A short-limbed individual would have a greater mechanical advantage in artistic gymnastic performance, whereas a long-limbed individual could benefit from a similar advantage in rhythmic gymnastics. Indeed, performance scores in elite female AG are negatively correlated with the degree of fatness or endomorphy of the individual (19). It is reasonable, therefore, for trainers (coaches) to select those individuals who best match the appropriate anthropometric criteria for each sport. The sport-specific selection criteria for artistic gymnastics suggests that a short stature with relatively short limbs, broad shoulders, and narrow hips is derived from genetic predisposition rather than a result of the specific sport activity (20). These observations are in concordance with the present data concerning the genetic predisposition for final height in the examined gymnasts. Although reported target height tends to be overestimated and therefore should be used with caution, the same procedure for data collection was used for both RG and AG.

Genetic predisposition, however, cannot fully explain the observed differences in stature between RG and AG. In this study, RG grow slightly taller, and AG grow considerably shorter than their genetic predisposition. Nevertheless, in RG, multiple regression analysis of the reported target height revealed an independent positive influence on actual height, whereas in AG this effect was actually lost. These findings are probably related to the specific conditions of training and performance in AG, as well as to their particular somatotype. Low body fat in RG could actually protect premature fusion of the epiphyses due to less substrate for steroidal aromatization in adipose tissue. Growth plates are submitted to abrupt and repetitive vertical forces that, especially in the lower limbs, could lead to premature fusion of the epiphyses in the healing process. Indeed, radiologic lesions at the hand and wrist of AG have been shown to result in overuse lesions of the growth plates, producing a negative end-organ effect (21). In a recent study (22), shorter leg length in AG was attributed to genetic predisposition, but reduced sitting height was worsened with continuous training activity and was considered to be a consequence of vigorous exercise that could be reversed with the cessation of gymnastics training.

Growth is a complex process, whereas gene expression is maximally achieved only when favorable conditions operate throughout the entire period of growth (23). The effect of stress and intensive physical training on growth is related to the combined effects of exercise intensity, exercise frequency, and exercise duration. Intensive athletic training of 18 h/wk for a long period of time is able to attenuate growth (23). Indeed, in the examined AG, the intensity of training had a negative impact on actual height SD score. Nevertheless, the observation that training in AG starts at a younger age compared with RG could be an additional factor in the observed deterioration of growth.

We have previously shown that RG exhibit a specific pattern of growth and pubertal development and that, despite the observed delay in skeletal maturation and pubertal development, the final height was not affected. Recent data from a longitudinal prospective study suggest an adequate compensatory catch-up growth phenomenon resulting from pubertal delay, with a recovery of growth potential (12). It is well established that the removal of factors associated with growth restriction results in growth for a longer than usual period, and is seen as an increased height velocity for chronological age (24). If bone maturation progresses slowly over a long period of time, then the achieved final height will be above the initially expected final height (24). In our examined sample of RG and AG, puberty started and progressed similarly for both RG and AG, thus excluding any discrepancies either in the onset of puberty or during pubertal development as the cause of the observed deterioration of growth in AG. Will AG present an adequate compensatory catch-up growth phenomenon resulting in a recovery of growth potential as puberty will progress? A large prospective study on the growth pattern of elite AG should be done to answer these critical questions.

In conclusion, this study confirms previous studies (1, 12) reporting the profound effects of intensive physical training in elite female RG and suggests that genetic predisposition to growth is not only preserved, but even exceeded. In contrast, in AG a deterioration of growth potential has been observed. Importantly, our findings add fuel to the idea that early initiation of elite-level training regimens may negatively impact on skeletal development and growth. The observed deterioration of growth in AG needs further evaluation to facilitate the improvement of standard training regimens that can reduce potential health risks in these elegant athletes.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Dimitris Dimitropoulos, President of the Hellenic Gymnastics Federation, who provided all necessary facilities and greatly encouraged the initiation of the present study.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AG, Artistic gymnasts; BMI, body mass index; RG, rhythmic gymnasts.

Received December 27, 2001.

Accepted March 19, 2002.

References

  1. Bernink MJE, Erich WBM, Peltenburg AL, Zonderland ML, Huisveld IA 1983 Height, body composition, biological maturation and training in relation to socio-economic status in girl gymnasts, swimmers and controls. Growth 47:1–12[Medline]
  2. Marcus R, Cann C, Madvij P, Minkoff J, Goddard M, Bayer M, Martin M, Gaudiani L, Haskell W, Genant H 1985 Menstrual function and bone mass in elite women distance runners. Ann Intern Med 102:158–163
  3. Warren MP 1980 The effects of exercise on pubertal progression and reproductive function in girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 51:1150–1157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Baxter-Jones ADG, Helms P, Baines-Preece J, Preece M 1994 Menarche in intensively trained gymnasts, swimmers and tennis players. Ann Hum Biol 21:407–415[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Peltenburg AL, Erich WBM, Bernink MJE, Zonderland ML, Huisveld IA 1984 Biological maturation, body composition and growth of female gymnasts and control groups of schoolgirls and girls swimmers, aged 8 to 14 years: a cross-sectional survey of 1064 girls. Int J Sports Med 5:36–42[Medline]
  6. Caldarone G, Leglise M, Giampietro M, Berlutti G 1986 Anthropometric measurements, body composition, biological maturation and growth predictions in young female gymnasts of high agonistic level. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 26:263–273[Medline]
  7. Claessens AL, Malina RM, Lefevre J, Beunen G, Stijnen V, Maes H, Veer FM 1992 Growth and menarcheal status of elite female gymnasts. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:755–763[Medline]
  8. Jost-Relyveld A, Sempe M 1982 Analyse de la croissance et de la maturation squelettique de 80 jeunes gymnasts internationaux. Pediatrie 37:247–262[Medline]
  9. Smit PJ 1973 Anthropometric observations on South African gymnasts. S Afr Med J 47:480–485[Medline]
  10. Theintz GE, Howald H, Weiss U, Sizonenko PC 1993 Evidence for a reduction of growth potential in adolescent female gymnasts. J Pediatr 122:306–313[Medline]
  11. Georgopoulos N, Markou K, Theodoropoulou A, Paraskevopoulou P, Varaki L, Kazantzi Z, Leglise M, Vagenakis AG 1999 Growth and pubertal development in elite female rhythmic gymnasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4525–4530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Georgopoulos N, Markou K, Theodoropoulou A, Vagenakis GA, Benardot D, Leglise M, Vagenakis AG 2001 Height velocity and skeletal maturation in elite female rhythmic gymnasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5159–5164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tanner JM 1962 Growth at adolescence, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell
  14. Lukaski HL 1987 Methods for the assessment of human body composition: traditional and new. Am J Clin Nutr 46:537–556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hicks VL, Stolarczyk LM, Heyward VH, Baumgartner RN 2000 Validation of near-infrared interactance and skinfold methods for estimating body composition of American Indian women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:531–539[Medline]
  16. Fornetti WC, Pivarnik JM, Foley JM, Fiechtner JJ 1999 Reliability and validity of body composition measures in female athletes. J Appl Physiol 87:1114–1122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tanner JM, Goldstein H, Whitehouse RH 1970 Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, and the stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child 51:170–179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Theintz GE, Howald H, Allemann Y, Sizonenko PC 1989 Growth and pubertal development of young female gymnasts and swimmers: a correlation with parental data. Int J Sports Med 10:87–91[Medline]
  19. Claessens A, Lefevre J, Beunen G, Malina RM 1999 The contribution of anthropometric characteristics to performance scores in elite female gymnasts. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 39:355–360[Medline]
  20. Buckler J, Brodie D 1977 Growth and maturity characteristics of schoolboy gymnasts. Ann Hum Biol 4:455–463[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Duvallet A, Leglise M, Auberge T, Zenny JC 1983 Radiological study on wrist bone lesions in sports. Cinesiologie 22:157–162
  22. Bradney B, Pearce G, Inge K, Stuckey S, Lo SK, Seeman E 2000 Short stature and delayed puberty in gymnasts: influence of selection on leg length and the duration of training on trunk length. J Pediatr 136:149–155[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Tanner JM 1986 Growth as a target-seeking function: catch up and catch down growth in man. In: Human growth, vol 1. Falkner F, Tanner JM, eds. New York: Plenum Press; 167–179
  24. Boersma B, Wit JM 1997 Catch-up growth. Endocr Rev 18:646–661[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Theodoropoulou, K. B. Markou, G. A. Vagenakis, D. Benardot, M. Leglise, G. Kourounis, A. G. Vagenakis, and N. A. Georgopoulos
Delayed but Normally Progressed Puberty Is More Pronounced in Artistic Compared with Rhythmic Elite Gymnasts Due to the Intensity of Training
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6022 - 6027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. A. Georgopoulos, A. Theodoropoulou, M. Leglise, A. G. Vagenakis, and K. B. Markou
Growth and Skeletal Maturation in Male and Female Artistic Gymnasts
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4377 - 4382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vagenakis, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Georgopoulos, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vagenakis, A. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals