help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vottero, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chrousos, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vottero, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chrousos, G. P.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 6 2658-2667
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


The Impact of the Human Genome on Endocrinology: Original Articles

A Novel, C-Terminal Dominant Negative Mutation of the GR Causes Familial Glucocorticoid Resistance through Abnormal Interactions with p160 Steroid Receptor Coactivators

Alessandra Vottero, Tomoshige Kino, Herve Combe, Pierre Lecomte and George P. Chrousos

Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch (A.V., T.K., G.P.C.), National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and Endocrine Unit, Medicine B (H.C., P.L.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, 37044 Tours, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Tomoshige Kino, M.D., Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 9D42, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1583, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1583. E-mail: . kinot{at}mail.nih.gov

Abstract

Primary cortisol resistance is a rare, inherited or sporadic form of generalized end-organ insensitivity to glucocorticoids. Here, we report a kindred in which affected members had a heterozygous T to G base substitution at nucleotide 2373 of exon 9{alpha} of the GR gene, causing substitution of Ile by Met at position 747. This mutation was located close to helix 12, at the C terminus of the ligand-binding domain, which has a pivotal role in the formation of activation function (AF)-2, a subdomain that interacts with p160 coactivators. The affinity of the mutant GR for dexamethasone was decreased by about 2-fold, and its transcriptional activity on the glucocorticoid-responsive mouse mammary tumor virus promoter was compromised by 20- to 30-fold. In addition, the mutant GR functioned as a dominant negative inhibitor of wild-type receptor-induced transactivation. The mutant GR through its intact AF-1 domain bound to a p160 coactivator, but failed to do so through its AF-2 domain. Overexpression of a p160 coactivator restored the transcriptional activity and reversed the negative transdominant activity of the mutant GR. Interestingly, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-fused GR{alpha}I747M had a slight delay in its translocation from the cytoplasm into the nucleus and formed coarser nuclear speckles than GFP-fused wild-type GR{alpha}. Similarly, a GFP-fused p160 coactivator had a distinctly different distribution in the nucleus in the presence of mutant vs. wild-type receptor, presenting also as coarser speckling. We conclude that the mutation at amino acid 747 of the GR causes familial, autosomal dominant glucocorticoid resistance by decreasing ligand binding affinity and transcriptional activity, and by exerting a negative transdominant effect on the wild-type receptor. The mutant receptor has an ineffective AF-2 domain, which leads to an abnormal interaction with p160 coactivators and a distinct nuclear distribution of both.

GLUCOCORTICOID RESISTANCE IS a rare, familial or sporadic condition that is characterized by generalized end-organ inability to respond to normal glucocorticoid levels (1). The syndrome has been associated with qualitative and/or quantitative abnormalities of the GR, primarily low affinity for glucocorticoids, low concentrations, or abnormal stability (2). Inactivating mutations within the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the GR, as well as a microdeletion of an exon-intron boundary of the GR gene, have been described in three kindreds and a sporadic case (3, 4, 5, 6). Three of these mutations influence both splice products of the human GR gene, namely the classic GR isoform {alpha} and its nonligand-binding isoform ß (3, 5, 6). The latter exerts a specific dominant-negative effect on the function of the former; however, its role in the physiological modulation of glucocorticoid actions remains uncertain (7, 8, 9, 10, 11). Recently, we described a genetically determined, imbalanced expression of GR{alpha} and GRß in cultured lymphocytes from a patient with generalized glucocorticoid resistance complicated by chronic leukemia and whose GR gene-coding regions were normal (12).

Binding of glucocorticoids to GR{alpha} causes it to dissociate from a cytoplasmic hetero-oligomer with heat shock proteins and induces its translocation into the nucleus (13). The ligand-bound GR{alpha} is imported into the nucleus with the assistance of two nuclear localization signals (NLS), NLS1 and NLS2 (14). After entering the nucleus, GR{alpha} rapidly binds as a homo- or heterodimer with GRß to specific DNA enhancer elements, the glucocorticoid-response elements (GREs), to change the transcriptional activity of glucocorticoid-dependent genes (15). GR{alpha} also influences the activities of other transcription factors, such as activator protein 1, nuclear factor {kappa}B, and several signal transducers and activators of transcription, through protein-protein interactions, possibly as a monomer (13).

The ability of the ligand-bound GR{alpha} to transactivate a steroid-responsive gene depends on the presence of activation function (AF)-1 and AF-2 interacting, bridging nucleoproteins, the coactivators, which have chromatin-remodeling and other enzymatic activities (16). The known coactivators of steroid receptors belong to several families. These include the p160 family, the recently described riboprotein coactivator steroid receptor RNA activator (SRA), the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein (CBP) and p300 family, and the CBP/p300-associated factor, PCAF. Both the p160 and CBP/p300 coactivators have multiple amphipathic LXXLL signal sequences (the coactivator motifs or nuclear receptor boxes), which, upon binding the ligand, serve as interfaces between these coactivators and a hydrophobic cleft formed by {alpha}helixes 3, 4, and 12 of the nuclear receptors (17, 18, 19). p160 proteins may also interact directly and/or via the riboprotein SRA with the AF-1 domain (20). The p160, CBP/p300, and PCAF proteins all have histone acetylase activity, which loosens the DNA strands from the nucleosomes and allows the transcription initiation complex of RNA-polymerase II and its ancillary components, the TATA Box binding protein-associated factors, to initiate and promote transcription (21).

Glucocorticoid resistance is characterized by compensatory elevations of circulating ACTH and cortisol, which, although set at levels higher than normal, maintain a circadian rhythm and responsiveness to stressors, and no overt clinical evidence of hypo- or hypercortisolism (1). Of interest, the molecular mechanisms via which glucocorticoids exert their negative feedback effects on central nervous system genes regulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, such as those of CRH and ACTH, involve both interaction with GREs and protein-protein interactions with other transcription factors controlling the activity of some of these genes (13, 15). The spectrum of clinical manifestations of glucocorticoid resistance is quite broad, varying from completely silent to mildly or severely symptomatic, including manifestations of androgen and/or mineralocorticoid excess (1, 2). The former may manifest as precocious puberty in children and as acne, hirsutism, male-pattern baldness, menstrual irregularities, and oligo-anovulation and infertility in women; the latter may appear as hypertension and/or hypokalemic alkalosis in either gender. In two kindreds, the presenting symptom was chronic fatigue (1, 2).

In this study, we assessed the molecular mechanisms of familial glucocorticoid resistance in a French family. Study of the structure and function of the GR gene, mRNA, and/or protein suggested that glucocorticoid resistance in this family was due to a novel missense mutation of the GR gene exon 9{alpha}, which affected the sequence of only this isoform of the receptor. This mutation led to abnormal receptor interactions with p160 nuclear receptor coactivators and aberrant nuclear distribution of both the receptor and its coactivators.

Patients and Methods

Patients

The proband was an 18-yr-old woman (height, 155 cm; weight, 41 kg; blood pressure, 110/60 mm Hg) with hyperandrogenism, elevated plasma cortisol concentrations (1700 mmol/liter; normal < 700), and increased 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC) excretion (1200 nmoles/d; normal < 220), but no stigmata of Cushing’s syndrome (Fig. 1AGo). She had her menarche at age 13 yr, developed cystic acne and hirsutism at puberty, and had persistent oligo-amenorrhea. Her two brothers and her father were phenotypically silent, but her brothers had elevated serum cortisol (840 and 960 nmoles/liter) and UFCs (696 and 770 nmoles/d), whereas her mother had normal morning serum cortisol (<700 nmoles/liter) and UFC (<220 nmoles/d) values.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Family pedigree. The proband is indicated by the arrow. Affected men had hypercortisolism to similar degree as the proposita but were asymptomatic. B, Sequencing data in members of the family tested. The location of the mutation is shown between the dotted lines. In exon 9{alpha}, the wild-type thymidine (T) is substituted by a guanosine (G) (A/C in the complementary sequence at nucleotide position 2373 of the cDNA). This mutation was not found in the mother’s sequence. The presence of this mutation caused the substitution of the wild-type amino acid isoleucine by methionine at position 747 of GR{alpha}.

 
Establishment of permanent cell lines

Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblast lines were established from peripheral blood lymphocytes from all members of the family. Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 10% FBS in the presence of 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD).

Amplification of genomic DNA by PCR and sequencing of amplified DNA

Genomic DNA was extracted from Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphocytes using a rapid extraction protocol (QIAamp Blood, QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA), according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer. PCR amplification of the GR gene was carried out using previously reported primer sequences (5). For the amplification of exons 3 through 9, intronic primer pairs complementary to sequences in the 5' and 3' exon-flanking regions were used. Exon 2, which encodes the entire N-terminal part of the GR, was amplified in three overlapping segments. PCR was performed in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Emeryville, CA) using Ampli-Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp.).

The samples were analyzed for their sequence by using ABI PRIZM dRhodamine Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and the ABI PRIZM Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems).

Transformed and tumor cell lines

COS-7, CV-1, and HeLa cells, purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD), were cultured in DMEM that was enriched as described above for RPMI 1640.

Plasmids

Expression vectors pRShGR{alpha}I747M, pBK/CMV-GR{alpha}I747M, and pF25-hGR{alpha}I747M, which carry the identified mutant GR cDNA, were constructed by PCR-assisted site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), using pRShGR{alpha}, pBK/CMV-hGR{alpha}, and pF25-hGR{alpha} as templates, respectively. pRShGR{alpha} and pRSVerbA-1 were kindly provided by Dr. R. M. Evans (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA). pGEX4T3-Glucocorticoid receptor-interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) (1–1462), and the -GRIP1 (596–774) and -GRIP1 (740–1217) expressing plasmids, which respectively contain an AF-2-directed GR binding site nuclear receptor interacting domain (NID) and an AF-1-directed GR binding site with NIDaux (22, 23, 24), were constructed by subcloning corresponding GRIP1 fragment cDNAs into pGEX-4T3 plasmid (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). pSG5-GRIP1 full-length (fl) was a kind gift from Dr. M. Stallcup (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA). pM-GRIP1 fl, pM-GRIP1 (1101–1462), and pM-GRIP1 (1–740) were constructed by subcloning the corresponding fragment cDNAs into pM (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) (25). pEGFP-SRC1e was a kind gift from Dr. M. A. Mancini (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX). pMMTV-luc, which codes for the luciferase cDNA under the control of the murine mammary tumor virus (MMTV) long terminal repeat promoter (which contains four GRE sites), was a kind gift from Dr. G. Hager (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). pSG5 and pSV40-ß-Gal were purchased from Stratagene and Promega Corp. (Madison, WI), respectively.

Transient transfection assay

COS-7 and CV-1 cells were transfected using lipofectin (Life Technologies, Inc.), and HeLa cells were transfected with lipofectin or the CaPO4 method, as previously described (26). COS-7 cells were transfected with 1.5 µg/well of either pRShGR{alpha} or pRShGR{alpha}I747M for whole cell ligand binding studies. For reporter assays, CV-1 cells were transfected with 0.05 µg/well of pRShGR{alpha} or pRShGR{alpha}I747M together with 0.3 µg/well of pMMTV-luc and 0.1 µg/well of pSV40-ß-Gal. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were incubated with graded concentrations of dexamethasone (0, 10-12 to 10-5 M) over 24 h. Cell lysates were collected, and luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were measured, as previously described (26). To examine the potential transdominant activity of GR{alpha}I747M, CV-1 cells were transfected with 0.05 µg/well of pRShGR{alpha} with increasing concentrations of pRShGR{alpha}I747M (ratio, 1:0 to 1:10) together with 0.3 µg/well of pMMTV-luc and 0.1 g/well of pSV40-ß-Gal. To further address the effect of GRIP1 on the transdominant activity of GR{alpha}I747M, 0.3 µg/well of plasmids expressing GRIP1 proteins were added. To keep the same amount of DNA in transfection, pRS-erbA-1 for pRShGR{alpha} or pRShGR{alpha}I747M, pSG5 for pSG5-GRIP1 fl and pM for pM-GRIP1s were used. The cells were similarly treated with appropriate doses of dexamethasone, and cell lysates were collected for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activity (26). All measurements were conducted in triplicate, and luciferase values were corrected by the ß-galactosidase values.

Whole-cell dexamethasone binding assay

COS-7 cells transfected with wild-type or mutant GR{alpha}-expressing vectors were incubated in RPMI 1640 with six concentrations of [3H] dexamethasone (1.56–50 nM) at 37 C in the presence or absence of a 500-fold molar excess of unlabeled dexamethasone for 1 h. After incubation, the cells were washed three times with cold PBS to remove free steroid. Specific binding was calculated by subtracting nonspecific from total binding, and these data were analyzed as proposed by Scatchard. Binding capacity was expressed as femtomoles per 106 cells, and the apparent dissociation constant (Kd) was expressed in nanomoles.

Gel mobility shift assay

COS-7 cells were transfected with 2.0 µg/ml pRShGR{alpha} or pRShGR{alpha}I747M as described. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the medium was replaced with either normal medium or medium containing dexamethasone 10-7 M. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed twice with PBS, and nuclear extracts were prepared as previously described (27). Four picomoles of the 22-bp double-stranded GRE probe (5'-GATCAGAACACAGTGTTCTCTA- 3', purchased from Stratagene, was labeled using 4 U T4 polynucleotide kinase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN) and 25 µCi {gamma} [32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol; Amerham-Pharmacia Biotech). Fifteen micrograms of undiluted nuclear extract protein were co-incubated with 100,000 cpm of 32P-labeled GRE probe for 20 min on ice, and then 15 min at room temperature. Supershift was tested using a specific anti-GR{alpha} polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). PAGE was performed in a 0.5 Tris/Borate/EDTA buffer at constant voltage (130 V) for 3 h. The gel was dried, and radioactivity was visualized by autoradiography.

In vitro translation of GRs and production of glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-fused GRIP1s

We produced in vitro translated and 35S-labeled GR{alpha}, GR{alpha}I747M using pBK/CMV-hGR{alpha} and pBK/CMV-hGR{alpha}I747M as templates, respectively, as well as bacterially expressed GST-fused GRIP1, GRIP1 (596–774) or GRIP1 (740–1217), as previously described (26).

GST pull-down assay

In vitro interaction of GRs and GRIP fragments was tested using above in vitro translated and labeled GR{alpha} or GR{alpha}I747M, and bacterially produced GST-fused GRIP1, GRIP1 (596–774) or GRIP1 (740–1217), which contain binding sites for AF-2 or AF-1 of nuclear receptors, respectively. In vitro binding assays were performed as described previously (26). Samples were loaded and electrophoresed on an 8% SDS-PAGE gel, and the gel was fixed and dried as previously described (26). Radioactivity was detected by exposing a film on the gel.

Detection and localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-fused receptors and SRC1e

COS-7 or HeLa cells were plated on coated 25-mm glass-bottom dishes (MatTek Corporation, Ashland, MA) in phenol red-free DMEM containing 10% charcoal-treated FBS (HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT). The cells were transfected with the indicated wild-type- or mutant receptor-expressing plasmids 24 h later. For the experiments examining trafficking of wild-type or mutant receptor, 10-6 M dexamethasone was added after 48 h of transfection, and fluorescence was detected sequentially by an inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 135; Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY), as described previously (28). For experiments using EGFP-fused SRC1e, 10-6 M dexamethasone or vehicle was added to the dishes 24 h after transfection. Forty-eight hours after transfection, and after 24-h incubation with dexamethasone, the fluorescence was analyzed with the same microscope. Twelve-bit black-and-white images were captured using a digital charge-coupled device camera (Photometrix, Tucson, AZ). Image analysis and presentation were performed using the IPLab Spectrum software (Scanalytics, Vienna, VA).

Results

Sequencing

The deduced mRNA nucleotide sequence of the GR from sequencing the GR gene (exons 2–8, 9{alpha} and 9ß) was normal except for a heterozygous base change at cDNA nucleotide position 2373, corresponding to exon 9{alpha}, where the nucleotide thymidine of the wild-type sequence was substituted by guanosine (codon ATT vs. ATG) (Fig. 1BGo). This predicted an amino acid change from Ile to Met at position 747, close to the C terminus of the LBD but outside the ligand-binding pocket (Fig. 2Go). This novel point mutation was present in the heterozygous state in all of the affected members of the family, but not in the unaffected mother who had a normal sequence (Fig. 1Go). To confirm the presence of the mutation and, therefore, exclude any PCR artifacts, sequencing analysis was performed several times.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Schematic representation of the human GR gene and the alternatively spliced cDNAs encoding the {alpha} and ß isoforms of this receptor. The mutation of this kindred is shown by an arrow. B, Functional domains of the GR. Functional domains and subdomains are indicated. DBD, DNA-binding domain. C, Possible location of the I747M mutation in the tertiary structure of the LBD of the GR. The crystal structure of human retinoic acid receptor {alpha} LBD was used to extrapolate that of the GR{alpha} LBD.

 
Because the three-dimensional crystal structure of the human GR LBD has not been reported, we used the stereometry of the human estrogen and progesterone receptor LBDs, whose crystal structures are available, to understand the position of the mutation identified (29, 30). We found that this mutation is located at three amino acids N-terminally upstream of helix 12, which plays a crucial role in the formation of the ligand-induced AF-2 domain of steroid receptor (18, 19) (Fig. 2Go).

Properties of transfected mutant GR

Below we describe the results of the studies undertaken to examine the impact of the mutation identified on the functions of the GR. Binding studies performed in COS-7 cells transfected with either the mutant or wild-type receptors demonstrated that the former had a 2-fold increased Kd for dexamethasone (Kd, 29 ± 7.7 vs. 13.9 ± 2.6 nM), but no difference in Bmax. Western blots demonstrated similar levels of expression of both wild-type and mutant receptors in the transfected cells (data not shown).

In the absence of dexamethasone, GFP-GR{alpha}I747M, similarly to GFP-GR{alpha}, was primarily located in the cytoplasm of HeLa cells (Fig. 3AGo). Addition of 10-6 M dexamethasone induced rapid translocation of the mutant and wild-type receptor into the nucleus. The former translocated at a visibly slower rate and formed coarser speckles than the wild-type receptor (Fig. 3BGo).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. GFP-GR{alpha}I747M and wild-type receptor translocate into the nucleus in response to dexamethasone. HeLa cells were transfected with GFP-GR{alpha}-expressing (A) or GFP-GR{alpha}I747M-expressing (B) plasmid, and translocation of the GFP-tagged receptor was examined under the microscope after addition of 10-6 M dexamethasone. Note mild delay in the translocation and coarser nuclear speckling of the mutant receptor than those of the wild-type receptor.

 
GR{alpha}I747M and the wild-type receptor expressed in COS-7 cells in the presence of 10-6 M dexamethasone bound similarly to a radiolabeled double stranded consensus GRE-containing oligonucleotide in a gel shift mobility assay, suggesting that DNA binding activity of the mutant receptor was preserved (data not shown).

In CV-1 cells cotransfected with the pMMTV-luc, the mutant receptor had an effective concentration (EC50) of dexamethasone that was approximately 20- to 30-fold higher than that of the wild-type receptor, indicating an impaired ability to activate GRE-mediated gene expression (Fig. 4AGo). It was approximately 4- to 5-fold less potent than the wild-type receptor at 10-9 M dexamethasone and half as potent at 10-6 M dexamethasone. Increasing amounts of transfected pRShGR{alpha}I747M cotransfected with a constant concentration of the wild-type receptor inhibited GR{alpha} transactivation function, leading from a 25% suppression at 1:1 GR{alpha}/GR{alpha}I747M ratio to an 85% suppression at the 1:10 GR{alpha}/GR{alpha}I747M ratio (Fig. 4BGo).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Transcriptional activity of GR{alpha}I747M. A, Transcription activation of the MMTV-long terminal repeat-driven luciferase reporter gene by wild-type GR{alpha} or the mutant GR{alpha}I747M. For control purposes, CV-1 cells were transfected with pRSV-erbA-1. Transfected cells were exposed to graded concentrations of dexamethasone (10-12 to 10-5 M). B, Inhibition of GR{alpha}-mediated gene transcription by GR{alpha}I747M. CV-1 cells were cotransfected with a constant quantity of wild-type GR{alpha} and increasing amounts of GR{alpha}I747M with a ratio varying from 1:0 to 1:10. RLU, Relative light units.

 
Because the AF-2 domain is influenced by the stereotaxis of helix 12 and is involved in the binding of the GR with p160 coactivators (18), we tested the interaction of the mutant receptor with GRIP1 in a GST pull-down assay. GRIP1 contains two sites that bind to steroid receptors (Fig. 5Go). One site, located N-terminally between amino acids 542 and 745, contains three LXXLL sequences known as coactivator signature motifs or nuclear receptor boxes (17, 31) and interacts with the AF-2 domain of steroid receptors in a ligand-dependent fashion. The other site, located C-terminally between amino acids 1121 and 1250, binds to the AF-1 domain of steroid receptors in a ligand-independent fashion (23, 24) (Fig. 5AGo). In vitro translated and labeled GR{alpha} or GR{alpha}I747M and bacterially produced GST-fused GRIP1, GRIP1 (596–774) and GRIP1 (740–1217) had the following interactions in a GST pull-down assay: both mutant and wild-type receptors interacted with full-length GRIP1; the mutant receptor did not bind to GRIP1 (596–774), whereas the wild-type receptor did; the mutant receptor bound to GRIP1 (740–1217) similarly to the wild-type receptor (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. GR{alpha}I747M mutant binds to GRIP1 (1–1462) and GRIP1 (740–1217) but not with GRIP1 (596–774), which contains the AF-2 LXXLL nuclear receptor binding motifs. A, Linearized GRIP1 molecule and distribution of its functional domains. HLH, Helix-loop-helix; PAS, period, aryl hydrogen receptor and single-minded; AD1, activation domain 1; AD2, activation domain 2; NRB, nuclear receptor binding; NIDaux, auxiliary nuclear receptor interacting domain. B, In vitro translated and labeled wild-type GR{alpha} or GR{alpha}I747M was incubated with bacterially produced GST-GRIP (1–1462), -GRIP1 (596–774), or -GRIP1 (740–1217) in the absence or presence of 10-6 M dexamethasone. Samples were run on 8% SDS-PAGE gel, and gels were fixed and exposed to x-ray film.

 
We examined the ability of overexpressed GRIP1 to correct the transactivation defect of the mutant receptor and to abolish its dominant negative activity of the mutant receptor (Fig. 6Go). Overexpression of GRIP1 did not change mutant receptor-driven transactivation activity at 10-9 M dexamethasone but moderately corrected it at high concentrations of dexamethasone. GRIP1 completely abolished the transdominant negative effect of GR{alpha}I747M to the wild-type receptor. Overexpression of GRIP1 (1–774), however, did not influence the transdominant negative effect of the mutant receptor.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Excess amount of GRIP1 attenuates the transdominant effect of GR{alpha}I747M on the wild-type receptor. CV-1 cells were transfected with GR{alpha}- and/or GR{alpha}I747M-expressing plasmid and the indicated GRIP1-expressing plasmid together with pMMTV-luc and pSV40-ß-Gal. Bars show mean ± SE in the absence or presence of 10-9 M dexamethasone.

 
We expressed EGFP-fused SRC1e in the presence of wild-type or mutant receptor and examined its localization in COS-7 cells (Fig. 7Go). In the absence of dexamethasone, EGFP-SRC1e was homogeneously spread in the nucleus of both wild-type and mutant receptor-expressing cells. In the presence of 10-6 M dexamethasone, however, it showed fine granular distribution in the nucleus of cells containing the wild-type receptor, whereas it demonstrated coarse granular distribution in the nucleus of cells containing the mutant receptor.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Wild-type GR{alpha} and GR{alpha}I747M induce different distribution of EGFP-SRC1e in COS-7 cells. COS-7 cells were cotransfected with EGFP-SRC1e and GR{alpha}- or GR{alpha}I747M-expressing plasmid and were incubated for 24 h in the absence or presence of 10-6 M dexamethasone. Distribution of EGFP-SRC1e in the nuclei was observed under the microscope.

 
Discussion

The heterozygous mutation at amino acid residue 747 in the C terminus of the LBD of the GR identified in affected members of this family lay outside the ligand-binding pocket but decreased the affinity of the receptor for dexamethasone by about 2-fold. This affinity defect was associated with an 8-fold elevation of 24-h UFC excretion in affected members of this family (eight times the normal mean value). Previously reported patients with glucocorticoid resistance, in whom one GR allele was not expressed, had a 6-fold elevation in UFC (5), whereas in two other families with point mutations of the receptor, 3- and 2-fold decreases in the affinity of the GR were associated with 40-fold (3) and 6-fold (4, 32) elevations of UFC, respectively. The differences in the UFC elevation between members of this family (8-fold) and the family with the one allele knockout (6-fold) suggest that in this family the mutant receptor has a dominant negative effect on the wild-type receptor expressed biochemically by compensatory elevations of cortisol secretion. On the basis of UFC excretion, the dominant negative effect of this family’s mutant receptor was less than that of the single sporadic case reported by Karl et al. (6) in which the UFC was approximately 12-fold higher than normal.

The 747 mutation was a few amino acids upstream of helix 12 of the LBD (Fig. 2Go). This helix plays a crucial role in the protein-protein interactions between nuclear receptors and p160 coactivators, and, hence, in the ability of the receptors for active transcription modulation (18, 19). In vitro expression studies showed that GR{alpha}I747M had a severely impaired ability to activate gene expression through glucocorticoid-responsive elements, an abnormality explained by the location of the mutation. Furthermore, the mutant receptor had a dominant negative effect on the wild-type receptor, suggesting a further decrement in the ability of the patients’ cells to respond to glucocorticoids. At a 1:1 ratio, the mutant receptor inhibited about 25% of the activity of the wild-type receptor, suggesting that the cells of affected family members sense less than 40% of the glucocorticoid activity of normal cortisol concentrations.

The location of the mutation predicted that interaction of the mutant receptor with p160 coactivators would be defective. In the GST pull-down experiments, both the mutant and wild-type GRs interacted with the full GRIP1 molecule, whereas the former did not interact with the GRIP1 fragment carrying only the AF-2 interacting site (Fig. 5BGo). This suggests that, possibly, the mutant GR forms a complex with GRIP1, which is partially or completely ineffective, because one important interaction site is either weak or nonexistent. This concept was supported by the reporter assay, in which negative transdominant activity of the mutant receptor was completely abolished by overexpression of the p160 coactivator GRIP1. This phenomenon may be the result of restoring the defect of AF-2 activity and/or of overstimulating AF-1 activity. Given the location of the mutation in the AF-2 domain, it is possible that the interaction with AF-2 domain-interacting proteins other than p160 coactivators could also be defective. These include the CBP/p300 cointegrators and the vitamin D receptor-interacting proteins/thyroid hormone receptor associated proteins complex (21).

This is the second mutation of the GR reported to have a dominant negative effect on the wild-type receptor, with about 25% inhibition at the 1:1 ratio of mutant to wild-type receptor (6). This mutation differs markedly from the first in its location (C terminus vs. hinge region of the LBD) and effect on ligand binding affinity (2-fold decrease vs. no binding at all), but it exerts a similar degree of dominant negative effect on the wild-type receptor. Indeed, in the first case of a dominant negative GR mutation, the translocation of the mutant molecule to the nucleus was severely impaired, whereas the same molecule significantly delayed the translocation of the wild-type receptor (33). We hypothesize that, in both instances, the mutant receptors not only have severely compromised inherent activity as homodimers, but also form heterodimers with the wild-type receptors, producing functional impairment in one or more of the post ligand-binding steps, i.e. translocation into the nucleus or interaction with coregulators and/or general transcription factors (13). In this kindred, mutant and wild-type GR{alpha} gene alleles of patients were equally expressed, indicating that their cells would produce up to 50% of GR mutant/wild-type heterodimers, forming a moderately compromised coactivator complex with p160 coactivators, up to 25% of wild-type homodimers, forming a fully active complex, and up to 25% of mutant homodimers, forming a severely compromised complex (Fig. 8Go).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. A, Schematic model of the effect of the molecular defect caused by the I747M mutation in the binding of receptor/LXXLL motif. B, Possible mechanism of GR{alpha}I747M transdominant negative activity on the wild-type receptor.

 
The translocation of GFP-labeled mutant GR from the cytoplasm into the nucleus after addition of dexamethasone was slightly slower than that of the wild-type receptor. In addition, whereas the fluorescence of both receptors was spread in the nucleus in a granular fashion, with the exception of nucleoli, in which no fluorescence was seen, the distribution of the former was grossly coarser than that of the latter. Similarly, the nuclear fluorescence of EGFP-SRC1e in the presence of dexamethasone and wild-type GR was finely granular, but became coarser in the presence of the mutant GR. We hypothesize that the mutant wild-type GR heterodimers or the mutant homodimers interact differently from wild-type homodimers with nuclear molecules that define distribution of activated GR{alpha} and p160 coactivators in the nucleus. In a very recent series of reports, nuclear receptors and their coactivators were found to accumulate in nuclear bodies (speckles or ND10 bodies) containing promyelocytic leukemia protein, as well as several components of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (34, 35, 36, 37). These accumulations represent important sites of nuclear receptor and coactivator pools that are involved in the regulation of transcription. Visible coarse accumulation of our patients’ mutant receptors and p160 coactivators in nuclear speckles suggests that aberrantly interacting nuclear receptors and p160 coactivators are retained in such nuclear bodies and unavailable for participating in the formation of the transcriptosome of responsive genes.

Although the clinically overt syndrome of glucocorticoid resistance due to changes in the GR gene is rare, we believe that mild GR or non-GR-related forms of the condition in both women and men may not have been recognized (1, 2). Recently, two sisters with multiple, partial steroid resistance, with manifestations of isolated, generalized, partial glucocorticoid resistance, were described (38). In these patients, the defect appeared to be in a coregulator of the GR rather the receptor itself, influencing several nuclear hormone signal systems (16). On the other hand, the ability of the GR{alpha}I747M mutant to interact abnormally with and probably sequester p160 coactivator molecules in ND10 bodies suggests that the affected members of our family might have subclinical resistance to other nuclear hormones, a testable hypothesis. Indeed, it would be important to analyze not only GRs but also other functionally related molecules, such as several nuclear hormone coregulators in common disorders in which the glucocorticoid signal transduction pathway might be pathophysiologically involved. Glucocorticoid resistance and hypersensitivity could be respectively associated with hyperandrogenism and/or hypertension, and visceral obesity, hypertension, and/or osteoporosis (1, 2).

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. M. A. Mancini, M. Stallcup, R. M. Evans, and G. L. Hager for kindly providing their plasmids to us. We also thank B. S. Warren for kindly supplying purified mouse GR{alpha} protein and K. Zachman, M.A., for excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

A.V. and T.K. contributed equally to this work.

Abbreviations: AF, Activation function; CBP, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein; fl, full-length; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GRE, glucocorticoid-response element; GRIP1, GR-interacting protein 1; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; Kd, dissociation constant; LBD, ligand-binding domain; MMTV, murine mammary tumor virus; NID, nuclear receptor-interacting domain; NLS, nuclear localization signal; SRA, steroid receptor RNA activator; UFC, urinary free cortisol.

Received August 15, 2001.

Accepted January 18, 2002.

References

  1. Chrousos GP, Detera-Wadleigh SD, Karl M 1993 Syndromes of glucocorticoid resistance. Ann Intern Med 119:1113–1124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kino T, Chrousos GP 2001 Glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid resistance/hypersensitivity syndromes. J Endocrinol 169:437–445[Abstract]
  3. Hurley DM, Accili D, Stratakis CA, Karl M, Vamvakopoulos N, Rorer E, Constantine K, Taylor SI, Chrousos GP 1991 Point mutation causing a single amino acid substitution in the hormone binding domain of the glucocorticoid receptor in familial glucocorticoid resistance. J Clin Invest 87:680–686
  4. Malchoff DM, Brufsky A, Reardon G, McDermott P, Javier EC, Bergh CH, Rowe D, Malchoff CD 1993 A mutation of the glucocorticoid receptor in primary cortisol resistance. J Clin Invest 91:1918–1925
  5. Karl M, Lamberts SW, Detera-Wadleigh SD, Encio IJ, Stratakis CA, Hurley DM, Accili D, Chrousos GP 1993 Familial glucocorticoid resistance caused by a splice site deletion in the human glucocorticoid receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:683–689[Abstract]
  6. Karl M, Lamberts SW, Koper JW, Katz DA, Huizenga NE, Kino T, Haddad BR, Hughes MR, Chrousos GP 1996 Cushing’s disease preceded by generalized glucocorticoid resistance: clinical consequences of a novel, dominant-negative glucocorticoid receptor mutation. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 108:296–307[Medline]
  7. Bamberger CM, Bamberger AM, de Castro M, Chrousos GP 1995 Glucocorticoid receptor ß, a potential endogenous inhibitor of glucocorticoid action in humans. J Clin Invest 95:2435–2441
  8. de Castro M, Elliot S, Kino T, Bamberger C, Karl M, Webster E, Chrousos GP 1996 The non-ligand binding ß-isoform of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR ß): tissue levels, mechanism of action, and potential physiologic role. Mol Med 2:597–607[Medline]
  9. Oakley RH, Jewell CM, Yudt MR, Bofetiado DM, Cidlowski JA 1999 The dominant negative activity of the human glucocorticoid receptor ß isoform. Specificity and mechanisms of action. J Biol Chem 274:27857–27866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Oakley RH, Sar M, Cidlowski JA 1996 The human glucocorticoid receptor ß isoform. Expression, biochemical properties, and putative function. J Biol Chem 271:9550–9559[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Vottero A, Chrousos GP 1999 Glucocorticoid receptor ß: view I. Trends Endocrinol Metab 10:333–338[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Shahidi H, Vottero A, Stratakis CA, Taymans SE, Karl M, Longui CA, Chrousos GP, Daughaday WH, Gregory SA, Plate JM 1999 Imbalanced expression of the glucocorticoid receptor isoforms in cultured lymphocytes from a patient with systemic glucocorticoid resistance and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 254:559–565[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bamberger CM, Schulte HM, Chrousos GP 1996 Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid receptor function and tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Endocr Rev 17:245–261[Abstract]
  14. Savory JG, Hsu B, Laquian IR, Giffin W, Reich T, Hache RJ, Lefebvre YA 1999 Discrimination between NL1- and NL2-mediated nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor. Mol Cell Biol 19:1025–1037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Beato M, Sanchez-Pacheco A 1996 Interaction of steroid hormone receptors with the transcription initiation complex. Endocr Rev 17:587–609[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Chrousos GP 1999 A new "New" syndrome in the New World: is multiple postreceptor steroid hormone resistance due to a coregulator defect? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4450–4453[Free Full Text]
  17. Heery DM, Kalkhoven E, Hoare S, Parker MG 1997 A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors. Nature 387:733–736[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Shiau AK, Barstad D, Loria PM, Cheng L, Kushner PJ, Agard DA, Greene GL 1998 The structural basis of estrogen receptor/coactivator recognition and the antagonism of this interaction by tamoxifen. Cell 95:927–937[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Bourguet W, Germain P, Gronemeyer H 2000 Nuclear receptor ligand-binding domains: three-dimensional structures, molecular interactions and pharmacological implications. Trends Pharmacol Sci 21:381–388[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Lanz RB, McKenna NJ, Onate SA, Albrecht U, Wong J, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O’Malley BW 1999 A steroid receptor coactivator, SRA, functions as an RNA and is present in an SRC-1 complex. Cell 97:17–27[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. McKenna NJ, Lanz RB, O’Malley BW 1999 Nuclear receptor coregulators: cellular and molecular biology. Endocr Rev 20:321–344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Hong H, Darimont BD, Ma H, Yang L, Yamamoto KR, Stallcup MR 1999 An additional region of coactivator GRIP1 required for interaction with the hormone-binding domains of a subset of nuclear receptors. J Biol Chem 274:3496–3502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Webb P, Nguyen P, Shinsako J, Anderson C, Feng W, Nguyen MP, Chen D, Huang SM, Subramanian S, McKinerney E, Katzenellenbogen BS, Stallcup MR, Kushner PJ 1998 Estrogen receptor activation function 1 works by binding p160 coactivator proteins. Mol Endocrinol 12:1605–1618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Ma H, Hong H, Huang SM, Irvine RA, Webb P, Kushner PJ, Coetzee GA, Stallcup MR 1999 Multiple signal input and output domains of the 160-kilodalton nuclear receptor coactivator proteins. Mol Cell Biol 19:6164–6173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kino T, Slobodskaya O, Pavlakis GN, Chrousos GP 2002 Nuclear receptor coactivator p160 proteins enhance the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 long terminal repeat promoter by bridging promoter-bound factors and the Tat/pTEFß complex. J Biol Chem 277:2396–2405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kino T, Gragerov A, Kopp JB, Stauber RH, Pavlakis GN, Chrousos GP 1999 The HIV-1 virion-associated protein vpr is a coactivator of the human glucocorticoid receptor. J Exp Med 189:51–62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Nakazato M, Chung HK, Ulianich L, Grassadonia A, Suzuki K, Kohn LD 2000 Thyroglobulin repression of thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) gene expression is mediated by decreased DNA binding of nuclear factor I proteins which control constitutive TTF-1 expression. Mol Cell Biol 20:8499–8512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Stauber RH, Horie K, Carney P, Hudson EA, Tarasova NI, Gaitanaris GA, Pavlakis GN 1998 Development and applications of enhanced green fluorescent protein mutants. Biotechniques 24:462–466, 468–471[Medline]
  29. Brzozowski AM, Pike AC, Dauter Z, Hubbard RE, Bonn T, Engstrom O, Ohman L, Greene GL, Gustafsson JA, Carlquist M 1997 Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature 389:753–758[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Williams SP, Sigler PB 1998 Atomic structure of progesterone complexed with its receptor. Nature 393:392–396[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Ding XF, Anderson CM, Ma H, Hong H, Uht RM, Kushner PJ, Stallcup MR 1998 Nuclear receptor-binding sites of coactivators glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) and steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1): multiple motifs with different binding specificities. Mol Endocrinol 12:302–313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Malchoff CD, Javier EC, Malchoff DM, Martin T, Rogol A, Brandon D, Loriaux DL, Reardon GE 1990 Primary cortisol resistance presenting as isosexual precocity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:503–507[Abstract]
  33. Kino T, Stauber RH, Resau JH, Pavlakis GN, Chrousos GP 2001 Pathologic human GR mutant has a transdominant negative effect on the wild-type GR by inhibiting its translocation into the nucleus: importance of the ligand-binding domain for intracellular GR trafficking. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5600–5608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. LaMorte VJ, Dyck JA, Ochs RL, Evans RM 1998 Localization of nascent RNA and CREB binding protein with the PML-containing nuclear body. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4991–4996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Stenoien DL, Mancini MG, Patel K, Allegretto EA, Smith CL, Mancini MA 2000 Subnuclear trafficking of estrogen receptor-{alpha} and steroid receptor coactivator-1. Mol Endocrinol 14:518–534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Lonard DM, Nawaz Z, Smith CL, O’Malley BW 2000 The 26S proteasome is required for estrogen receptor-{alpha} and coactivator turnover and for efficient estrogen receptor-{alpha} transactivation. Mol Cell 5:939–948[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Baumann CT, Ma H, Wolford R, Reyes JC, Maruvada P, Lim C, Yen PM, Stallcup MR, Hager GL 2001 The glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) localizes in discrete nuclear foci that associate with ND10 bodies and are enriched in components of the 26S proteasome. Mol Endocrinol 15:485–500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. New MI, Nimkarn S, Brandon DD, Cunningham-Rundles S, Wilson RC, Newfield RS, Vandermeulen J, Barron N, Russo C, Loriaux DL, O’Malley B 1999 Resistance to several steroids in two sisters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:4454–4464[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Charmandari, T. Kino, T. Ichijo, and G. P. Chrousos
Generalized Glucocorticoid Resistance: Clinical Aspects, Molecular Mechanisms, and Implications of a Rare Genetic Disorder
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1563 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
H. Raef, E. Y Baitei, M. Zou, and Y. Shi
Genotype-phenotype correlation in a family with primary cortisol resistance: possible modulating effect of the ER22/23EK polymorphism.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 158(4): 577 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Charmandari, T. Kino, T. Ichijo, W. Jubiz, L. Mejia, K. Zachman, and G. P. Chrousos
A Novel Point Mutation in Helix 11 of the Ligand-Binding Domain of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene Causing Generalized Glucocorticoid Resistance
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3986 - 3990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Lin, P. Philibert, B. Ferraz-de-Souza, D. Kelberman, T. Homfray, A. Albanese, V. Molini, N. J. Sebire, S. Einaudi, G. S. Conway, et al.
Heterozygous Missense Mutations in Steroidogenic Factor 1 (SF1/Ad4BP, NR5A1) Are Associated with 46,XY Disorders of Sex Development with Normal Adrenal Function
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 991 - 999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
P. Carlsson, S. Burendahl, and L. Nilsson
Unbinding of Retinoic Acid from the Retinoic Acid Receptor by Random Expulsion Molecular Dynamics
Biophys. J., November 1, 2006; 91(9): 3151 - 3161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Charmandari, T. Kino, T. Ichijo, K. Zachman, A. Alatsatianos, and G. P. Chrousos
Functional Characterization of the Natural Human Glucocorticoid Receptor (hGR) Mutants hGR{alpha}R477H and hGR{alpha}G679S Associated with Generalized Glucocorticoid Resistance
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1535 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Russcher, P. Smit, E. F. C. van Rossum, E. L. T. van den Akker, A. O. Brinkmann, L. J. M. de Heide, F. H. de Jong, J. W. Koper, and S. W. J. Lamberts
Strategies for the Characterization of Disorders in Cortisol Sensitivity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 694 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. A.E. Irving, L. Minto, S. Bailey, and A. G. Hall
Loss of Heterozygosity and Somatic Mutations of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene Are Rarely Found at Relapse in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia but May Occur in a Subpopulation Early in the Disease Course
Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9712 - 9718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. S. Chriguer, L. L. K. Elias, I. M. da Silva Jr., J. G. H. Vieira, A. C. Moreira, and M. de Castro
Glucocorticoid Sensitivity in Young Healthy Individuals: in Vitro and in Vivo Studies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 5978 - 5984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
P. Carlsson, K. F. Koehler, and L. Nilsson
Glucocorticoid Receptor Point Mutation V571M Facilitates Coactivator and Ligand Binding by Structural Rearrangement and Stabilization
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 19(8): 1960 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Charmandari, A. Raji, T. Kino, T. Ichijo, A. Tiulpakov, K. Zachman, and G. P. Chrousos
A Novel Point Mutation in the Ligand-Binding Domain (LBD) of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor (hGR) Causing Generalized Glucocorticoid Resistance: The Importance of the C Terminus of hGR LBD in Conferring Transactivational Activity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3696 - 3705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
E. Charmandari, G. P. Chrousos, T. Ichijo, N. Bhattacharyya, A. Vottero, E. Souvatzoglou, and T. Kino
The Human Glucocorticoid Receptor (hGR) {beta} Isoform Suppresses the Transcriptional Activity of hGR{alpha} by Interfering with Formation of Active Coactivator Complexes
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 19(1): 52 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Charmandari, T. Kino, E. Souvatzoglou, A. Vottero, N. Bhattacharyya, and G. P. Chrousos
Natural Glucocorticoid Receptor Mutants Causing Generalized Glucocorticoid Resistance: Molecular Genotype, Genetic Transmission, and Clinical Phenotype
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1939 - 1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. U. De Martino, N. Bhattachryya, S. Alesci, T. Ichijo, G. P. Chrousos, and T. Kino
The Glucocorticoid Receptor and the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter-Transcription Factor II Interact with and Mutually Affect Each Other's Transcriptional Activities: Implications for Intermediary Metabolism
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2004; 18(4): 820 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Recent Prog Horm ResHome page
E. F.C. van Rossum and S. W.J. Lamberts
Polymorphisms in the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene and Their Associations with Metabolic Parameters and Body Composition
Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2004; 59(1): 333 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Kunz, R. Sandoval, P. Carlsson, J. Carlstedt-Duke, J. W. Bloom, and R. L. Miesfeld
Identification of a Novel Glucocorticoid Receptor Mutation in Budesonide-Resistant Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2003; 17(12): 2566 - 2582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Koyano, Y. Saito, M. Nagano, K. Maekawa, Y. Kikuchi, N. Murayama, T. Fujino, S. Ozawa, T. Nakajima, K. Matsumoto, et al.
Functional Analysis of Three Genetic Polymorphisms in the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2003; 307(1): 110 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Kino and G. P. Chrousos
Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha Receptor- and Fas-associated FLASH Inhibit Transcriptional Activity of the Glucocorticoid Receptor by Binding to and Interfering with Its Interaction with p160 Type Nuclear Receptor Coactivators
J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3023 - 3029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow