help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Méduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Milgrom, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Méduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Milgrom, E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CALCIUM COMPOUNDS
*CALCIUM, ELEMENTAL
*MENOTROPINS
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 5 2266-2276
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptors in Oocytes?

Geri Méduri1, Nathalie Charnaux1, Marc-Antoine Driancourt, Laurent Combettes, Philippe Granet, Brigitte Vannier, Hugues Loosfelt and Edwin Milgrom

Unité de Recherches, INSERM, U-135, Hormones, Gènes, et Reproduction, Hôpital Bicêtre (G.M., N.C., B.V., H.L., E.M.), 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INRA, Center de Recherches de Tours (M.-A.D.), 37380 Nouzilly, France; Unité de Recherches, INSERM, U-274, Université Paris-Sud (L.C.), 91400 Orsay, France; and Institut Mutualiste de Montsouris, Laboratoire de Procréation Médicalement Assistée (P.G.), 75014 Paris, France

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Edwin Milgrom, Hôpital de Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Cedex, France. E-mail: . u135{at}kb.inserm.fr

Abstract

The regulatory mechanisms of oocyte maturation remain poorly understood. Although gonadotropins play a major role in these processes, they have generally been considered to act on somatic supportive cells, but not directly on germ cells. We have raised high affinity monoclonal antibodies against LH and FSH receptors. When using the latter to study receptor distribution in human and pig ovaries we have observed the presence of FSH (but not LH) receptors in the oocytes. FSH receptors appeared in the oocytes of primary follicles during follicular development and persisted up to the preovulatory stage. In denuded human preovulatory oocytes, FSH receptor mRNA was detected at a concentration per cell exceeding by about 20-fold that present in granulosa cells. Saturable binding of [125I]FSH to the membrane of oocytes was demonstrated by autoradiography. When incubated with FSH, denuded oocytes responded by a mobilization of Ca2+. These observations concur to demonstrate the presence of functional FSH receptors in oocytes and raise the possibility of direct control of oocyte development by FSH.

THE MECHANISMS of maturation of germinal cells have always been the subject of great scientific interest. In the case of the oocyte, arrest and resumption of meiosis as well as acquisition of the competence to become fertilized have been specially investigated (1, 2, 3). Recent progress in assisted reproduction has increased interest in these mechanisms. Cloning by nuclear transfer objectifies the ability of the oocytic cytoplasm to set off a program of embryonic development even in differentiated nuclei (4). Culture of oocytes to maturity is an emerging technology that may transform the practice of in vitro fertilization (IVF) (5, 6).

In all cases the regulatory mechanisms of oocyte maturation remain poorly understood. Gonadotropins play a very important role and are supposed to act on somatic supportive cells and not directly on germ cells (7, 8). The oocyte develops inside the ovarian follicle, enclosed by granulosa cells. The latter are separated by a basement membrane from layers of thecal cells. FSH is known to act on granulosa cells, whereas LH has mainly a steroidogenic activity in thecal cells. LH receptors (LHR) are present in granulosa cells only at later stages of development, in large antral follicles. These conclusions derive mainly from experiments involving stimulation by gonadotropins of isolated cells or from analysis of receptor distribution using radioactive gonadotropins and autoradiography (9, 10). Recently, RT-PCR and in situ hybridization methods allowed the study of gonadotropin receptor mRNAs (11, 12, 13, 14, 15). However, several of these methods did not allow very precise localization or were at the limit of their sensitivity due to the low concentration of receptors. We have raised high affinity monoclonal antibodies against LHR and FSH receptors (FSHR) (16, 17, 18). Using the latter to study receptor distribution in human and pig ovaries, we have observed the presence of FSH (but not LH) receptors in the oocytes. This observation, which was confirmed by the presence of receptor mRNA in denuded human preovulatory oocytes as well as autoradiography and Ca2+ mobilization studies, raises the possibility of direct control of oocyte development by FSH.

Materials and Methods

Ovaries and oocytes

Porcine ovaries were obtained from 20 adult sows. Human ovaries originated from tissues discarded after hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology of 9 cycling women (37–43 yr old). Tissue specimens were frozen in liquid nitrogen. Oocytes were retrieved from 6 preovulatory sows. For RNA studies porcine oocytes were mechanically denuded of granulosa cells. Human oocytes were obtained from an IVF and an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) program. For ethical reasons only the oocytes that failed to fertilize were used in this study. IVF oocytes were denuded by repeated passages through a fine needle pipette; ICSI oocytes were denuded by a 25-sec hyaluronidase treatment (80 IU/ml). Microscopic examination allowed the retention of only oocytes devoid of granulosa cell contamination. Oocytes were pooled and frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction. For immunohistochemistry, autoradiography, or calcium measurements, oocytes were placed in 1 ml IVF medium (Medi-Cult, Jyllinge, Denmark) under 5% CO2.

Human granulosa cells were collected during oocyte retrieval. After gradient Percoll centrifugation and washing, the cells were counted and frozen as aliquots.

Immunocytochemistry

Monoclonal antihuman FSHR 323 and 156 and anti-LHR 38 antibodies have been previously described, and their specificities were extensively studied (17, 18, 19). They recognize the extracellular domain of FSHR and LHR, respectively. These antibodies have also been used in a variety of immunocytochemical, immunopurification, and immunoprecipitation studies (17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25). Frozen sections and whole fixed oocytes were immunolabeled as previously described (17, 18, 20). In the present experiments controls included replacement of the specific antibodies with nonimmune mouse Igs (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or with anti-FSHR antibodies preincubated overnight at 4 C with a 100-fold molar excess of FSHR ectodomain expressed in Escherichia coli (17). Unfixed oocytes were immunolabeled by successive micropipetting onto petri dishes filled with 200 µl of the same reagents as those used for immunolabeling of sections. The oocytes were deposed on sylanized slides.

Autoradiography

Human denuded oocytes were washed in DMEM and incubated at 37 C for 90 min at room temperature in 0.2 ml 0.05 M sodium phosphate, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M CaCl2, and 0.01 M EDTA buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% sodium azide and 2.25% fatty acid-free BSA (Sigma). Oocytes were incubated with 10-8 M [125I]hFSH (SA, 80 µCi/µg) or 10-8 M [125I]hCG (SA, 80 µCi/µg; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA). Other oocytes were incubated with [125I]hFSH or [125I]hCG in the presence of an excess of unlabeled hormone [10-6 M Metrodin HP (Serono, Braintree, MA) or 10-6 M hCG (Endo, Organon, West Orange, NJ)]. After five washes the oocytes were placed on slides precoated with an emulsion for microautoradiography (LM1, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL). The slides were revealed (9) after 1 wk and examined by Nomarski differential interference contrast microscopy. Similar experiments were performed on granulosa cells.

FSHR and LHR mRNA

The absence of granulosa cells was verified individually for every denuded oocyte by microscopic examination. RNA was extracted from the pooled oocytes (and in a parallel experiment from varying numbers of granulosa cells) with the RNAeasy mini kit (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA). Half of the extract was used for RT with random primers (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD; 20 pmol/20 µl reaction) and Superscript RNase H- reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.; 100 IU/reaction). Ten microliters of the cDNA mixture were used for PCR (total volume, 50 µl). The following synthetic FSHR primers were used: either nucleotides 202–223 (exon 2) and 559–583 (exon 7) or nucleotides 568–592 (exon 7) and 909–933 (exon 10; nucleotides are numbered from the initiation ATG codon). The following LHR primers were used: nucleotides 170–206 (exon 2) and 336–360 (exon 4). After 31 cycles of amplification, 30 µl were electrophoresed in 3% agarose and analyzed by Southern blot using an internal 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe (105 cpm/ml). The probe corresponded to either nucleotides 343–366 (exon 4) or nucleotides 790–813 (exon 9) for the FSHR and to nucleotides 273–298 (exon 4) for the LHR. Human muscle RNA was used as a negative control.

FSH effect on intracellular Ca2+

Denuded human oocytes were incubated in IVF medium (Medicult) containing 3 µM fura-2/AM, then plated onto polylysine-coated glass coverslips and incubated for 30 min at 37 C under an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. In some experiments granulosa cells collected from patients in an IVF program were harvested from the follicular aspirate, seeded onto circular glass polylysine-coated coverslips, and challenged with fura-2 for 30 min at 37 C. In all cases the coverslips were then washed with saline solution. They were put onto a thermostated holder (37 C) on the stage of a Axiovert 35 microscope (Carl Zeiss, New York, NY). Ca2+ imaging was performed as described by Combettes et al. (26). Briefly, fluorescence images were collected by a low light level ISIT camera (Lhesa, France), digitized, and integrated in real time by an image processor (Metafluor, Princeton, NJ).

Calibration of fura-2 fluorescence in terms of the Ca2+ concentration was performed in individual oocytes and calculated from the ratio of 340/380 nm fluorescence as described by Grynkiewicz et al. (27) using a Kd (Ca2+-dye) of 250 nM. The ratios Rmax and Rmin were determined as previously described (26). The oocytes or granulosa cells were continuously superfused at a rate or 1.5 ml/min with the test solution or with the control buffer.

For experiments using gap junction inhibitors, oocytes were incubated with 1-octanol (1 mM) or 18{alpha}-glycyrrhetinic acid (250 µM) for 10 min and then with recombinant FSH (100 mIU/ml).

Results

Immunostaining of FSHR in pig oocytes

During a study of FSHR distribution in pig ovaries we observed strong immunostaining in oocytes. Figure 1Go, a and b, shows sections of a preantral follicle reacted with anti-FSHR 156 monoclonal antibody. The zona pellucida clearly separates the oocyte from the granulosa cells; both are strongly labeled. Immunostaining is present on the cell membrane and also inside the cells, as previously observed for gonadotropin receptors. This probably corresponds to the receptor precursor that accumulates in the cells (17, 19). A similar labeling was observed when using another monoclonal anti-FSHR antibody (antibody 323) recognizing a different epitope on the ectodomain of the receptor (not shown). As a control for staining specificity by FSHR 156 antibody, adjacent sections were reacted with a nonreceptor-related monoclonal antibody of the same class (IgG1) and at the same concentration. No labeling was observed (Fig. 1cGo). Another control involved preincubation of the antireceptor monoclonal antibody with purified FSH receptor ectodomain expressed in Escherichia coli (Fig. 1eGo). The immunostaining was suppressed (compared with control in Fig. 1dGo). When the anti-FSH receptor antibody was incubated with LHR ectodomain expressed in E. coli, there was no decrease in immunostaining (not shown). As is often the case for very rare proteins, immunostaining for gonadotropin receptors could only be studied on frozen sections (28, 29). For this reason the morphology of the oocytes was not as good as in Formol-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. However, the immunolabeling of oocyte sections or of the surface of intact oocytes was very clear-cut.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Anti-FSHR antibodies label porcine oocytes. a, Section of a porcine preantral follicle immunostained with monoclonal anti-FSHR 156 antibody (low magnification, x200). Granulosa cells and the oocyte are immunolabeled. There is no staining of thecal cells. b, Higher magnification view (x600) of an immunostained oocyte in a porcine preantral follicle. c, Serial section of the same follicle immunostained with control mouse Igs of the same class (IgG1; x600). d, Section of a secondary follicle labeled with anti-FSHR 156 antibody (x300). Arrows indicate the outer limit of the zona pellucida. e, Serial section of the same follicle immunolabeled with anti-FSHR 156 antibody preincubated with a 100-fold excess of receptor ectodomain produced in E. coli (x300). O, Oocyte; GC, granulosa cells; TI, theca interna; ZP, zona pellucida.

 
Immunostaining of FSHR in oocytes during the development of pig ovarian follicles

Forty pig ovaries were analyzed, and 219 different follicles containing oocytes were observed. Primordial follicles, showing an oocyte surrounded by a squamous layer of pregranulosa cells, were never labeled by anti-FSHR antibodies (Fig. 2aGo). Follicles intermediary between primordial and primary stages with both squamous and cubical granulosa cells showed faint immunostaining. The boundaries between the oolemma and the surrounding cells were not clearly distinguishable. In most follicles immunostaining was present at this stage, but it was difficult to determine whether it was associated with the oocyte or the granulosa cells. In most cases granulosa cells were not labeled on the membrane regions outside those contacting the oocyte. The majority (91%) of primary follicles (Fig. 2bGo) were labeled with the anti-FSHR antibody. The immunostaining was moderately intense. The immunolabeled oocyte was surrounded by cubical granulosa cells whose immunostaining was no longer restricted to the areas in contact with the oolemma, but included the whole cellular membrane. All secondary follicles were immunolabeled, most of them strongly. With increasing size of the follicle, the development of the zona pellucida allowed clear delineation of immunostaining of the oocyte from that of granulosa cells (Fig. 2cGo). The number of antral follicles containing oocytes that could be observed was smaller. Indeed, at this stage the oocytes that were weakly attached to the follicle were frequently washed out during the various incubation and washing procedures. Twelve oocytes could be examined, present in apparently healthy follicles. Ten were stained with anti-FSHR antibodies (Fig. 2dGo); two were not labeled. The LHR antigen was absent in the oocytes at all stages of follicular development. Figure 2eGo shows an antral follicle in which only the theca interna was labeled by anti-LHR antibodies and the oocyte was not immunostained.



View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immunostaining of FSHR in oocytes of porcine follicles at various stages of development: a, primordial follicle; b, primary follicles; c, large secondary follicle; d, antral follicle; and e, antral follicle immunolabeled with anti-LHR antibody. Anti-FSHR antibody 156 and anti-LHR antibody 38 were used. Magnification: A, x1000; B, x400; C, x300; D, x400; E, x200. O, Oocyte; GC, granulosa cells; ZP, zona pellucida; TI, theca interna.

 
Immunostaining of FSHR in human oocytes

The study of human ovaries was less extensive due to the limited availability of tissues from normal cycling women. However, the observed patterns were very similar to those seen in pig ovaries. Primordial follicles were never stained (not shown), whereas primary follicles were immunolabeled by anti-FSHR antibody (Fig. 3aGo). The aspect was very similar to that observed at the same stage in the pig: overall oocyte staining contrasted with granulosa cells displaying staining limited to the membrane bordering the oocyte. Secondary follicles of all sizes were also labeled (Fig. 3bGo). The presence of the pellucida allowed us to clearly delineate the immunostaining of the oocyte from that of the granulosa cells. Preovulatory oocytes obtained during IVF procedures also reacted with anti-FSHR antibodies. Figure 3cGo shows a section of such an oocyte stained with anti-FSH receptor antibody 323, whereas Fig. 3eGo shows the surface labeling of an intact nonsectioned oocyte. Control experiments involved the absence of labeling with a nonreceptor-related IgG2a monoclonal antibody (Fig. 3dGo) and with antibody 323 previously preincubated with an excess of FSH receptor ectodomain synthesized in E. coli (not shown). The preovulatory oocytes were not stained with anti-LHR antibodies (Fig. 3fGo).



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. FSHR immunostaining of human oocytes. Section of a primary follicle (a; x1000) and of a large secondary follicle (b; x300) immunolabeled with anti-FSHR antibody 323. Serial sections of an isolated preovulatory oocyte immunostained with anti-FSHR 323 antibody (c) and with control IgG 2a mouse Igs (d; x500). Unfixed nonsectioned human preovulatory oocyte immunostained with anti-FSHR antibody 323 (e) and anti-LHR antibody (f). O, Oocyte; GC, granulosa cells; ZP, zona pellucida.

 
Immunostaining of FSHR in oocytes of atretic follicles

Several oocytes were observed inside atretic follicles in both pig and human ovaries (Fig. 4Go). A variety of situations were observed. In some cases oocyte staining disappeared, whereas granulosa cells remained labeled. In other cases the opposite situation was seen; oocytes were labeled, but there was no more FSHR staining in the granulosa cells. In some follicles FSHR immunostaining was suppressed in both oocyte and granulosa. Finally, in the rare cases where FSH immunolabeling persisted in both granulosa and oocyte, it was usually diminished in either one of these structures.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Atretic follicles immunostained for FSHR. a, Porcine atretic follicle. FSHR are absent from the oocyte and surrounding degenerating granulosa cells (x200). b, Porcine atretic follicle. The oocyte is devoid of FSHR, whereas surrounding granulosa cells are immunoreactive for FSHR (x300). c, Human antral atretic follicle. The oocyte expresses FSHR, whereas surrounding granulosa cells are not immunolabeled with FSHR antibody (x300).

 
FSHR mRNA in human and pig oocytes

To confirm the presence of FSHR in the oocytes we used RT-PCR to detect the mRNA. We obtained human oocytes from an IVF program. For ethical reasons only oocytes that failed to develop after IVF or ICSI were used. In all cases they were individually examined and retained only if they were totally devoid of attached granulosa cells. RNA was extracted from 60 oocytes, transcribed into cDNA with random primers, and amplified using primers corresponding to exons 7 and 10 of the receptor gene. A Southern blot was performed using a DNA corresponding to exon 9 as a probe. In parallel, RNA was extracted from various numbers (ranging from 60–5000) of granulosa cells and identically submitted to RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 5AGo, the signal given by 60 oocytes corresponded approximately to the signal given by 1200 granulosa cells. Similar results were obtained using primers corresponding to exons 2 and 7 of the human FSHR gene (probe in exon 4). On the contrary, there was no signal for LHR mRNA in oocytes in similar conditions, whereas LHR mRNA was readily detected in granulosa cells (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Study of FSHR and LHR mRNA in human oocytes. RNA was extracted from 60 denuded human oocytes (B) and from 5000 (C1), 1200 (C2), 400 (C3), and 60 (C4) granulosa cells. Human muscle RNA (1 µg) was used as a control (A). RT-PCR and Southern blots were carried out as described in Materials and Methods. Primers specific for exons 7 and 10 of FSHR allowed the amplification of a 366-bp DNA fragment (A). Primers specific for exons 2 and 4 of LHR allowed the amplification of a 191-bp DNA fragment (B). C, A glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA internal control (31 ) was run in parallel. Amplification of the cDNA yielded a 341-bp fragment, which was stained by ethidium bromide.

 
To further characterize human FSHR cDNA, five fragments spanning the region between nucleotide -28 and nucleotide 1819 were amplified, and their sequences were determined. There was no difference from the previously reported sequence (30). The extra band observed in granulosa cell samples (Fig. 5AGo) was also sequenced and shown to correspond to a splicing variant (addition of 102 intronic nucleotides at the end of exon 8). A parallel experiment using the mRNA of a housekeeping gene (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) (31) showed a similar ratio of mRNA per cell between the oocyte and the granulosa cells (Fig. 5CGo). FSHR mRNA was also detected in denuded porcine oocytes (data not shown).

[125I]FSH binding to human oocytes

The binding of FSH to oocytes could not be studied using biochemical methods, because this would have necessitated using thousands of oocytes. We thus used autoradiography, which allows determination of hormone binding to individual oocytes. Oocytes were incubated with either [125I]FSH or [125I]FSH in the presence of an excess of unlabeled hormone. After extensive washing an autoradiographic film was applied. As shown in Fig. 6AGo, the granulosa-free oocytes bound [125I]FSH, and this binding was saturable because it was competed out by unlabeled FSH (Fig. 6BGo). A positive control involved granulosa cells and gave a similar result (Fig. 6DGo). On the contrary, [125I]hCG did not bind to oocytes (Fig. 6CGo).



View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. [125I]FSH binding to human oocytes. Human denuded oocytes were incubated with [125I]FSH (10 nM; A) or [125I]FSH in the presence of an excess of unlabeled hormone (B). After washing, autoradiography was performed as described in Materials and Methods. As controls, oocytes were also incubated with [125I]hCG (10 nM; C), and granulosa cells were incubated with [125I]FSH (D).

 
FSH-induced Ca2+ mobilization in human oocytes

FSHR are coupled to adenylate cyclase and also to PLC (32, 33, 34, 35). The latter is known to modulate Ca2+ mobilization, which may be analyzed in individual cells. Such studies could be performed even with the limited number of oocytes available. Human oocytes were loaded with fura-2, washed for 10 min with saline, and then challenged with 100 mIU/ml recombinant (Puregon Organon) or purified (Metrodin HP) human FSH. The basal intracellular calcium Ca2+ concentration in the oocytes was 47 ± 4 nM. Addition of Metrodin HP induced a 5-fold increase in the intracellular Ca2+ concentration to 250 ± 10 nM (mean ± SEM of 11 experiments). The concentration returned spontaneously to the basal level within 3–4 min. Delivery of control medium had no effect on Ca2+. The same pattern of response was observed with recombinant FSH, excluding the possibility of contamination with nonrelevant proteins. This Ca2+ increase was observed in 54% of the studied oocytes (n = 48). This may be due to alteration of some of these oocytes that were studied 48 h after recovery and were failures of IVF or ICSI. Oocytes that failed to respond to FSH also gave a minimal response to thimerosal (200 µM), which has been shown to provoke a large Ca2+ increase in oocytes by direct mobilization of Ca2+ stores (36). The studied oocytes were totally devoid of contaminating granulosa cells when examined by a variety of microscopic methods. Further evidence for the absence of granulosa cells was obtained from the following experiment. Human granulosa cells were loaded with fura-2 and challenged with 10 µM ATP. An oscillatory intracellular calcium response was observed (data not shown), confirming previous reports (37). In contrast, FSH-responding oocytes did not respond to ATP (Fig. 7Go). These oocytes also failed to respond to hCG (500 mIU/ml).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Ca2+ mobilization in human oocytes. Upper and middle graphs, Human denuded oocytes were loaded with fura-2. ATP, FSH, or hCG was added, and the fluorescence was recorded (see Materials and Methods). Lower graph, Effects of a gap junction inhibitor on FSH-induced increase in Ca2+. Oocytes loaded with fura-2 were challenged with FSH for the time shown by the open bar. 18{alpha}-Glycyrrhetinic acid (AGA) was applied as indicated by the horizontal bar. Resting time represents washing with buffer.

 
To exclude further the possibility that Ca2+ signals were elicited via gap junctions by contaminating granulosa cells, we performed experiments in the presence of gap junction inhibitors: 1-octanol (38) and 18{alpha}-glycyrrhetinic acid (39). For each compound three experiments were performed, and in all cases the Ca2+ response was not modified (Fig. 7Go). These experiments as well as microscopic examination, immunocytochemistry, autoradiography, and RT-PCR showed no evidence of contamination by granulosa cells.

Discussion

Immunocytochemical studies showed the presence of FSHR in both pig and human oocytes. These observations contradict the presently accepted dogma. It was thus very important to eliminate the possibility of artifacts. We have very carefully examined the specificity of the antibodies used for these studies and also the specificity of oocyte immunostaining. The monoclonal anti-FSHR antibodies have been prepared by immunization of mice with recombinant FSHR obtained in E. coli. Their characterization has been described in detail (17). That these antibodies did indeed recognize the FSHR was shown by their ability to immunoprecipitate [125I]FSHR complexes and to specifically detect the receptor in Western blot experiments (17). The antibodies allowed immunopurification of the receptor (17) and immunostained cells transfected with expression vectors encoding FSHR (22, 23). No staining was seen on parent nontransfected or mock-transfected cells. The monoclonal antibodies labeled, as expected, Sertoli cells in the testis (17) and granulosa cells in the ovary (24). In addition to these previously published controls of the specificity of the monoclonal antibodies, some further controls were performed in the present work. Immunostaining was similar on adjacent sections of oocytes incubated with two monoclonal antibodies recognizing two different epitopes on the FSHR. There was no immunostaining with control nonrelated monoclonal antibodies of the same class and at the same concentration. The immunostaining of the oocytes was extinguished after preincubation with recombinant FSHR, but not with recombinant LHR.

The presence of FSHR and its mRNA in oocytes was confirmed by autoradiography, RT-PCR, and Ca2+ mobilization studies. These results were not due to oocyte contamination by granulosa cells, as all of the oocytes were denuded and verified individually by light microscopy. In some experiments the absence of contamination was confirmed by using semithin sections and electron microscopy. RT-PCR showed a 20-fold excess of FSHR mRNA per cell in oocytes compared with granulosa cells. The contamination by granulosa cells should thus have been massive (but invisible with microscopy) to explain our results. Autoradiography showed saturable binding of [125I]FSH to the entire surface of the oocytes and was not restricted to some regions, as would have been the case if the binding was due to contaminating adherent granulosa cells. In Ca2+ mobilization studies the oocytes were loaded with fura-2 and examined for fluorescence. Fluorescent granulosa cells would have been obvious in these conditions. Finally, the Ca2+ response to ATP was different in oocytes and granulosa cells, and gap junction inhibitors did not prevent FSH-induced Ca2+ mobilization in the oocytes.

Ovarian follicular development is known to proceed to primordial and primary stages independently of the action of FSH. This has been observed in mice carrying invalidations of the FSHß and FSHR genes (40, 41) and also in patients with mutations suppressing the function of the FSHR (24, 25, 42). Increasing FSH concentrations seem, on the contrary, necessary for further stages of development (43, 44). Although a minority of previous studies have given some hints of the existence of FSH-binding sites in the oocytes (45, 46) and also in spermatogonia (47, 48), their methodology could not demonstrate this unequivocally. Furthermore, a majority of studies showed FSH binding or FSHR mRNA only in the granulosa (15, 49, 50, 51). This has led to a consensus that this hormone would act only on granulosa cells (52). Oocyte development was considered secondary to these effects and due to diffusable substances, possibly passing through gap junctions between granulosa cells and the oocyte. However, it is known that follicles enucleated from their oocytes fail to develop even in presence of FSH (53). It is thus possible that two-way exchanges occur and that a direct action of FSH on oocytes produces compounds whose diffusion into the granulosa cells is necessary for their proliferation and maturation. In atretic follicles we observed that FSHR are lost (or markedly decreased) in the oocyte, the granulosa layers, or both. This may be a phenomenon secondary to atresia. Alternatively, it may be its primum movens, with the lack of activity of FSH in either the oocyte or the granulosa inducing atresia. It is thus possible that FSH must act in both cell types to promote follicular growth and development. During development of the human ovarian follicle, the oocyte undergoes a 300-fold size increase. The number of organelles (mitochondria, Golgi, ribosomes, cortical granules, etc.) increases dramatically (54). A variety of RNA and protein molecules are synthesized and stored (55). The oocyte is blocked in the diplotene stage of prophase I of the first meiotic division. The block will only be relieved at a later stage, secondarily to the LH peak (6). It is during this growth period that oocytes acquire the ability to undergo meiosis (meiotic competence). It is still largely unknown which of these events is FSH dependent and what are the underlying molecular mechanisms occurring in granulosa cells, oocytes, or both.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. D. Pathier, C. Cheramy, and C. Pierre for their help. V. Coquendeau and A. D. Dakhlia typed the manuscript.

Footnotes

This work was supported by INSERM, the Faculté de Medecine Paris Sud, the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, and the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer.

1 G.M. and N.C. contributed equally to the work. Back

Abbreviations: FSHR, FSH receptor; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF, in vitro fertilization; LHR, LH receptor.

Received December 7, 2001.

Accepted January 17, 2002.

References

  1. Wassarman PM, Albertini DF 1994 The mammalian ovum. In: Knobil E, Neill JD, eds. The physiology of reproduction, 2nd Ed. New York: Raven Press; 79–115
  2. Gosden RG, Bownes M 1995 Molecular and cellular aspects of oocyte development. In: Grudszinskas JG, Yovich JL, eds. cambridge reviews in human reproduction, gametes: the oocyte. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 23–53
  3. Fulka Jr J, First NL, Moor RM 1998 Nuclear and cytoplasmic determinants involved in the regulation of mammalian oocyte maturation. Mol Hum Reprod 4:41–49[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Campbell KH, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I 1996 Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380:64–66[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gosden RG, Oktay K, Mullan J, Jenner L 1996 In vitro oocyte culture: basic concept. In: Filicori M, Flamigni C, eds. The ovary: regulation, dysfunction and treatment. New York: Elsevier; 149–158
  6. Eppig JJ, O’Brien MJ 1996 Development in vitro of mouse oocytes from primordial follicles. Biol Reprod 54:197–207[Abstract]
  7. Oktay K, Newton H, Mullan J, Gosden RG 1998 Development of human primordial follicles to antral stages in SCID/hpg mice stimulated with follicle stimulating hormone. Hum Reprod 13:1133–1138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC 1997 Assessment of the need for follicle stimulating hormone in early preantral mouse follicle culture in vitro. Hum Reprod 12:759–768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Roy SK, Wang SC, Greenwald GS 1987 Radioreceptor and autoradiographic analysis of FSH, hCG and prolactin binding sites in primary to antral hamster follicles during the periovulatory period. J Reprod Fertil 79:307–313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Midgley Jr AR 1973 Autoradiographic analysis of gonadotropin binding to rat ovarian tissue sections. Adv Exp Med Biol 36:365–378[Medline]
  11. Minegishi T, Tano M, Igarashi M, Rokukawa S, Abe Y, Ibuki Y, Miyamoto K 1997 Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor in human ovary. Eur J Clin Invest 27:469–474[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Camp TA, Rahal JO, Mayo KE 1991 Cellular localization and hormonal regulation of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone receptor messenger mRNAs in the rat ovary. Mol Endocrinol 5:1405–1417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Minegishi T, Tano M, Abe Y, Nakamura K, Ibuki Y, Miyamoto K 1997 Expression of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotrophin (LH/hCG) receptor mRNA in the human ovary. Mol Hum Reprod 3:101–107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tisdall DJ, Watanabe K, Hudson NL, Smith P, Mc Natty KP 1995 FSH receptor gene expression during ovarian follicle development in sheep. J Mol Endocrinol 15:273–281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Oktay K, Briggs D, Gosden RG 1997 Ontogeny of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene expression in isolated human ovarian follicles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3748–3751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Loosfelt H, Misrahi M, Atger M, Salesse R, Vu Hai-Luu Thi MT, Jolivet A, Guiochon-Mantel A, Sar S, Jallal B, Garnier J, Milgrom E 1989 Cloning and sequencing of porcine LH-hCG receptor cDNA: variants lacking transmembrane domain. Science 245:525–528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Vannier B, Loosfelt H, Meduri G, Pichon C, Milgrom E 1996 Anti-human FSH receptor monoclonal antibodies: immunochemical and immunocytochemical characterization of the receptor. Biochemistry 35:1358–1366[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Meduri G, Charnaux N, Loosfelt H, Jolivet A, Spyratos F, Brailly S, Milgrom E 1997 Luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin receptors in breast cancer. Cancer Res 57:857–864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. VuHai-LuuThi MT, Misrahi M, Houiller A, Jolivet A, Milgrom E 1992 Variant forms of the pig lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor. Biochemistry 31:8377–8383[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Meduri G, VuHai-LuuThi MT, Jolivet A, Milgrom E 1992 New functional zonation in the ovary as shown by immunohistochemistry of luteinizing hormone receptor. Endocrinology 131:366–373[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Vuhai-Luuthi MT, Jolivet A, Jallal B, Salesse R, Bidart JM, Houllier A, Guiochon-Mantel A, Garnier J, Milgrom E 1990 Monoclonal antibodies against luteinizing hormone receptor. Immunochemical characterization of the receptor. Endocrinology 127:2090–2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Beau I, Misrahi M, Gross B, Vannier B, Loosfelt H, Hai MT, Pichon C, Milgrom E 1997 Basolateral localization and transcytosis of gonadotropin and thyrotropin receptors expressed in Madin-Darby canine kydney cells. J Biol Chem 272:5241–5248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Beau I, Groyer-Picard MT, Le Bivic A, Vannier B, Loosfelt H, Milgrom E, Misrahi M 1998 The basolateral localization signal of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor. J Biol Chem 273:18610–18616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Touraine P, Beau I, Gougeon A, Meduri G, Desroches A, Pichard C, Detoeuf M, Paniel B, Prieur M, Zorn JR, Milgrom E, Kuttenn F, Misrahi M 1999 New natural inactivating mutations of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: correlations between receptor function and phenotype. Mol Endocrinol 13:1844–1854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Beau I, Touraine P, Meduri G, Gougeon A, Desroches A, Matuchansky C, Milgrom E, Kuttenn F, Misrahi M 1998 A novel phenotype related to partial loss of function mutations of the follicle stimulating hormone receptor. J Clin Invest 102:1352–1359[Medline]
  26. Combettes L, Tran D, Tordjmann T, Laurent M, Berthon B, Claret M 1994 Ca2+-mobilizing hormones induce sequentially ordered Ca2+ signals in multicellular systems of rat hepatocytes. Biochem J 304:585–594
  27. Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY 1985 A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem 260:3440–3450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Isaacson P, Wright DH 1983 Immunocytochemistry of lymphoreticular tumours. In: Polak JM, Van Noorden S, eds. Immunocytochemistry, practical applications in pathology and biology. London: Wright & Sons; 249–273
  29. Dukers DF, Oudejans JJ, Jaspars EH, Gras M, Vos W, Middeldorp JM, Meijer CJ, Bloemena E 2000 All infiltrating T-lymphocytes in Hodgkin’s disease express immunohistochemically detectable T-cell receptor {zeta}-chains in situ. Histopathology 36:544–550[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Tilly JL, Aihara T, Nishimori K, Jia XC, Billig H, Kowalski KI, Perlas EA, Hsueh AJ 1992 Expression of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: species-specific ligand binding, signal transduction, and identification of multiple ovarian messenger ribonucleic acid transcripts. Endocrinology 131:799–806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Reischl U, Kochanowski B 1999 Quantitative PCR. In: Kochanowski B, Reischl U, eds. Quantitative PCR protocols. Totowa: Humana Press; 3–41
  32. Minegishi T, Tano M, Shinozaki H, Nakamura K, Abe Y, Ibuki Y, Miyamoto K 1997 Dual coupling and down regulation of human FSH receptor in CHO cells. Life Sci 60:2043–2050[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Quintana J, Hipkin RW, Sanchez-Yague J, Ascoli M 1994 Follitropin (FSH) and a phorbol ester stimulate the phosphorylation of the FSH receptor in intact cells. J Biol Chem 269:8772–8779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Gorczynska E, Handelsman DJ 1991 The role of calcium in follicle-stimulating hormone signal transduction in Sertoli cells. J Biol Chem 266:23739–23744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Flores JA, Veldhuis JD, Leong DA 1990 Follicle-stimulating hormone evokes an increase in intracellular free calcium ion concentrations in single ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology 127:3172–3179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Cheek TR, McGuinness OM, Vincent C, Moreton RB, Berridge MJ, Johnson MH 1993 Fertilisation and thimerosal stimulate similar calcium spiking patterns in mouse oocytes but by separate mechanisms. Development 119:179–189[Abstract]
  37. Lee PS, Squires PE, Buchan AM, Yuen BH, Leung PC 1996 P2-purinoreceptor evoked changes in intracellular calcium oscillations in single isolated human granulosa-lutein cells. Endocrinology 137:3756–3761[Abstract]
  38. Chanson M, Bruzzone R, Bosco D, Meda P 1989 Effects of n-alcohols on junctional coupling and amylase secretion of pancreatic acinar cells. J Cell Physiol 139:147–156[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Davidson JS, Baumgarten IM, Harley EH 1986 Reversible inhibition of intercellular junctional communication by glycyrrhetinic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 134:29–36[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Kumar TR, Wang Y, Lu N, Matzuk MM 1997 Follicle stimulating hormone is required for ovarian follicle maturation but not male fertility. Nat Genet 15:201–204[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Dierich A, Sairam MR, Monaco L, Fimia GM, Gansmuller A, LeMeur M, Sassone-Corsi P 1998 Impairing follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) signaling in vivo: targeted disruption of the FSH receptor leads to aberrant gametogenesis and hormonal imbalance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13612–13617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Aittomäki K, Lucena JL, Pakarinen P, Sistonen P, Tapanainen J, Gromoll J, Kaskikari R, Sankila EM, Lehvaslaiho H, Engel AR, Nieschlag E, Huhtaniemi J, De La Chapelle A 1995 Mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene causes hereditary hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. Cell 82:959–968[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Fauser BC, Van Heusden AM 1997 Manipulation of human ovarian function: physiological concepts and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev 18:71–106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hillier SG 1994 Currents concepts of the role of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in folliculogenesis. Hum Reprod 9:188–191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Oxberry BA, Greenwald GS 1982 An autoradiographic study of the binding of 125I-labeled follicle stimulating hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin and prolactin to the hamster ovary throughout the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 27:505–516[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Wang XN, Greenwald GS 1993 Hypophysectomy of the cyclic mouse. I. Effects on folliculogenesis, oocyte growth, and follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin receptors. Biol Reprod 48:585–594[Abstract]
  47. Orth J, Christensen AK 1978 Autoradiographic localization of specifically bound 125-I-labeled follicle-stimulating hormone on spermatogonia of the rat testis. Endocrinology 103:1944–51[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Baccetti B, Collodel G, Costantino-Ceccarini E, Eshkol A, Gambera L, Moretti E, Strazza M, Piomboni P 1998 Localization of human follicle-stimulating hormone in the testis. FASEB J 12:1045–1054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Uilenbroek JT, Richards JS 1979 Ovarian follicular development during the rat estrous cycle: gonadotropin receptors and follicular responsiveness. Biol Reprod 20:1159–1165[Abstract]
  50. Xu Z, Garverick HA, Smith GW, Smith MF, Hamilton SA, Youngquist RS 1995 Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in bovine follicles during the first follicular wave. Biol Reprod 53:951–957[Abstract]
  51. Simoni M, Gromoll J, Nieschlag E 1997 The follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: biochemistry, molecular biology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Endocr Rev 18:739–773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Adashi EY 1994 Endocrinology of the ovary. Hum Reprod 9:815–827[Free Full Text]
  53. Vanderhyden BC, Telfer EE, Eppig JJ 1992 Mouse oocytes promote proliferation of granulosa cells from preantral and antral follicles in vitro. Biol Reprod 46:1196–1204[Abstract]
  54. Wassarman PM 1996 Oogenesis. In: Adashi EY, Rock EY, Rosenwaks Z, eds. Reproductive endocrinology, surgery, and technology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 342–357
  55. Gosden R, Krapez J, Briggs D 1997 Growth and development of the mammalian oocyte. BioEssays 19:875–882[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Meduri, A. Bachelot, C. Duflos, B. Bstandig, C. Poirot, C. Genestie, R. Veitia, E. De Baere, and P. Touraine
FOXL2 mutations lead to different ovarian phenotypes in BPES patients: Case Report
Hum. Reprod., October 9, 2009; (2009) dep355v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. Acevedo, J. Ding, and G. D Smith
Insulin Signaling in Mouse Oocytes
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 872 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Basille, F. Olivennes, J. Le Calvez, N. Beron-Gaillard, G. Meduri, C. Lhomme, P. Duvillard, J. Benard, and P. Morice
Impact of gonadotrophins and steroid hormones on tumour cells derived from borderline ovarian tumours
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3241 - 3245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
X. Gueripel, V. Brun, and A. Gougeon
Oocyte Bone Morphogenetic Protein 15, but not Growth Differentiation Factor 9, Is Increased During Gonadotropin-Induced Follicular Development in the Immature Mouse and Is Associated with Cumulus Oophorus Expansion
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2006; 75(6): 836 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Ye, K.H.S. Campbell, J. Craigon, and M.R. Luck
Dynamic Changes in Meiotic Progression and Improvement of Developmental Competence of Pig Oocytes in Vitro by Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and Cycloheximide
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 399 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T.-T. Wong and Y. Zohar
Novel Expression of Gonadotropin Subunit Genes in Oocytes of the Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata)
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 5210 - 5220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. A. Nechamen, R. M. Thomas, B. D. Cohen, G. Acevedo, P. I. Poulikakos, J. R. Testa, and J. A. Dias
Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Receptor Interacts with the Adaptor Protein APPL1 in HEK 293 Cells: Potential Involvement of the PI3K Pathway in FSH Signaling
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 629 - 636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R Gomez, I Lima, C Simon, and A Pellicer
Administration of low-dose LH induces ovulation and prevents vascular hyperpermeability and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in superovulated rats
Reproduction, April 1, 2004; 127(4): 483 - 489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yang, A. Balla, N. Danilovich, and M. R. Sairam
Developmental and Molecular Aberrations Associated with Deterioration of Oogenesis During Complete or Partial Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Deficiency in Mice
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1294 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Meduri, P. Touraine, I. Beau, O. Lahuna, A. Desroches, M. C. Vacher-Lavenu, F. Kuttenn, and M. Misrahi
Delayed Puberty and Primary Amenorrhea Associated with a Novel Mutation of the Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor: Clinical, Histological, and Molecular Studies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3491 - 3498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. C. Zachos, R. B. Billiar, E. D. Albrecht, and G. J. Pepe
Developmental Regulation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Messenger RNA Expression in the Baboon Fetal Ovary
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1911 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Méduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Milgrom, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Méduri, G.
Right arrow Articles by Milgrom, E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CALCIUM COMPOUNDS
*CALCIUM, ELEMENTAL
*MENOTROPINS


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals