| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Other Original Articles |
Department of Medicine, Clinical Sciences Center, Northern General Hospital (R.M., P.W., A.W.), Sheffield, United Kingdom S5 7AU; and Departments of Medicine (N.J., S.G., M.C., M.L.) and Pathology (M.W.), University of Wales College of Medicine, and Department of Medical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Wales National Health Service Trust (N.J., C.E.), Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom CF14 4XN
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. M. Ludgate, Department of Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom CF14 4XN. E-mail: . ludgate{at}cf.ac.uk
Abstract
Human TSH receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies with biological activity result in thyroid dysfunction, but antibodies that simply bind do not. We have applied flow cytometry to the measurements of IgG, IgA, and IgE immunoreactivity to the TSHR in patients with Graves’ disease (GD) and thyroid eye disease (TED) and in normal controls.
CHO cells stably expressing the extracellular domain of the TSHR with a glycophosphatidylinositol anchor were produced and found to express approximately 4 times as many receptors, but of similar affinity, as JP09 in TSH binding studies. Substantial increases in median fluorescence and peak channel fluorescence were obtained by flow cytometry using TSHR monoclonal antibodies on the glycophosphatidylinositol cells.
IgG autoantibodies were demonstrated in 55 of 65 untreated GD patients, 3 of 25 normal subjects, and 4 of 8 atypical TED sera (negative for TSHR autoantibodies with biological activity) by flow cytometry and correlated poorly with thyroid-stimulating antibodies. IgA antibodies were present in 1 of 12 normal, 1 of 7 treated GD with TED, and 3 of 8 atypical TED sera. IgE binding was observed in 1 of 12 normal, 2 of 8 treated GD without TED, 1 of 6 treated GD with TED, and 0 of 8 atypical TED sera.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated autoantibodies that bind directly to the TSHR in the majority of GD patients and in 50% of patients with atypical TED and a small number of normal controls lacking TSHR antibodies that affect function. Although predominantly IgG 
, TSHR autoantibodies of the IgA and IgE isotypes are also detectable.
AUTOANTIBODIES to the TSH receptor (TSHR) are found in patients with autoimmune thyroid disorders, particularly Graves’ disease (GD). They are classified according to their biological activity. Thyroid-stimulating antibodies (TSAB) mimic the action of TSH and result in hyperthyroidism. Thyroid-blocking antibodies (TBAB) inhibit TSH induced stimulation and may be the cause of hypothyroidism in idiopathic myxedema. Both TSAB and TBAB may also be TSH binding-inhibiting Igs (TBII), which prevent hormone/receptor interaction (1).
Assays in current diagnostic use are not able to detect antibodies that simply bind to the receptor without any effect on the TSHR or TSH binding. The other major autoantigens in autoimmune thyroid disease are Tg and thyroperoxidase (TPO); both can be detected by direct binding, e.g. in ELISA (2). The incidence of TPO antibodies would be grossly underestimated if the only detection methods relied on a biological effect such as inhibition of enzyme activity. Direct binding has also revealed that 10–20% of normal euthyroid individuals, especially women, have circulating Tg and TPO autoantibodies, but little has been reported regarding TSHR antibodies in such a control population (3).
Previous studies investigating direct binding of autoantibodies to the TSHR have concentrated on sera from known TSAB- and/or TBII-positive GD patients. A variety of methods have been used, including ELISA, in vitro transcription/translation, Western blotting of bacterially produced TSHR, and flow cytometric analysis of cells expressing the full-length receptor or the extracellular domain (ECD) anchored via a glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) link (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Most studies report TSHR-binding autoantibodies in a proportion of sera containing TSAB and/or TBII and demonstrate the heterogeneity of TSHR autoantibodies, e.g. a GD patient with monoclonal gammopathy, having antibodies that bound to the TSHR in a Western blot, but were TBII and TSAB negative (11).
In the case of the TSHR, antibodies without biological effect may be of particular relevance in the extrathyroidal manifestations of GD, thyroid eye disease (TED), and pretibial myxedema. Pretibial myxedema is rare, but TED is frequently associated with GD, and several lines of evidence indicate that the TSHR may have a role in both disorders (12). These include the demonstration of TSHR transcripts and protein in the ocular tissues, especially in the adipose compartment (13, 14, 15), and the development of animal models of TED induced by transfer of TSHR-primed T cells (16) or TSHR genetic immunization (17). A strong argument against the TSHR being involved in TED is the fact that not all patients with TED have TSAB or TBII. This heterogeneous group of individuals with severe symptoms of TED in the absence of TSHR autoantibodies in conventional assays, which we have termed atypical TED, may have no evidence of thyroid dysfunction or may have been thyrotoxic previously.
TSAB are predominantly of the IgG1 isotype, and there is some evidence for light chain restriction. Other isotypes have been implicated in the extrathyroidal manifestations of GD (18), and increases in the level of IgA secretion in tears have also been reported in 25% of patients (19). Furthermore, in the receptor-induced animal models of TED, mast cells were an early indicator of orbital pathology, and elevated IgE levels have been found in GD patients (20), both of which are suggestive of IgE immunoreactivity to the TSHR.
The aim of the present study was to investigate antibodies binding to the TSHR in individuals negative for TSAB and TBII, either normal controls or patients with atypical TED, and to determine whether TSHR autoantibodies are exclusively of the IgG isotype and/or light chain restricted in these and a panel of GD sera.
Subjects and Methods
Subjects studied
Serum samples from a total of 110 individuals were tested. This included 65 untreated patients with GD, defined by thyrotoxicosis, a diffuse goiter, and the presence of Tg or TPO antibodies or an appropriate family history or exophthalmos, and 12 patients with treated GD. Of the latter group, 6 also had TED, i.e. exophthalmos measured by exophthalmometry. All of these patients had TSHR autoantibodies detected as TSAB or TBII. We also selected 8 atypical TED patients who were negative for TSAB and TBII in conventional assays: 3 with no evidence of thyroid dysfunction, 1 with newly diagnosed GD, and 4 who were previously treated for GD. All 8 patients had exophthalmos of at least grade II; their details are shown in Table 1
. We also studied 25 biochemically euthyroid normal blood donors (16 females and 9 males) selected at random from the local blood transfusion service. All samples were obtained with informed consent and with the approval of the local ethics committee in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
|
TSAB and TBII were measured on CHO cell lines stably expressing the human TSHR, lulu or NA-4 for TSAB (21, 22) and JP09 for TBII (23), as previously described in detail.
Construction and characterization of GPI cell line
Construction of GPI-anchored TSHR ECD. A synthetic linker encoding a thrombin cleavage site and an artificial GPI attachment site based on a region of domain 3 of rat CD4 (7) was created by annealing of the following seven oligonucleotides and cloned into the XhoI and XbaI sites of pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), 5'-TCGAGCTGGTGCCAAGAGGCTCTATCGAGGGCAGA-3', 5'-CGTGATGGATGTGCCTCTGCCCTCGATAGAGCCTCTTGGCACCAGC-3', 5'-GGCACATCCATCACGGCCTATAAGAGTGAG-3', 5'-CTCCGCTGACTCCCCCTCACTCTTATAGGC-3', 5'-GGGGAGTCAGCGGAGTTCTTCTTCCTACTC-3', 5'-CTAGCTAGACGAGCACGAGCAGGAGCAGAAGGATGAGTAG GAAGAAGAA-3', 5'-ATCCTTCTGCTCCTGCTCGTGCTCGTCTAG-3', 5'-GGCTCGAGTATGTCTTCACACGGGTT-GAACTC-3', and 5'-GCCGGATCCATGAGGCCGGCGGA-CTTGCTG-3'.
The region coding the extracellular domain of human TSHR [amino acids 1 (methionine) to 412 (isoleucine)] was amplified using the High Fidelity Taq polymerase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and the following oligonucleotide primers: sense, 5'-GCCGGATCCATGAGGCCGGCGGACTTGCTG-3'; antisense, 5'-GGCTCGAGTATGTCTTCACACGGGTTGAACTC-3', and was cloned into the BamHI and XhoI sites upstream of the GPI anchor sequence to give the plasmid pGPI-TSHR. The final construct was verified by sequencing using an ABI 310 system (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Plasmid pGPI-TSHR was transfected into CHO-K1 cells using Tfx-50 (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and stable lines were selected using G418 at a concentration of 400 µg/ml. Clonal lines were obtained and screened by FACS using TSHR monoclonal antibody 2C11 (Serotec, Oxford, UK).
The expression of TSHR ECD on the GPI cell surface was demonstrated by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies A10 (1:50 dilution) (24), BA8 (1:10 dilution) (25), and 3G4 (1:50 dilution) (25), used as culture medium, and 2 µg/tube purified 2C11 (Serotec) to the human TSHR, followed by an antimouse IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Ig-FITC) conjugate (1:32; DAKO Corp., Carpenteria, CA), as described in detail below.
TSH binding studies were performed on 1.5 x 105 cells in 12-well plates to estimate the numbers of receptors expressed at the surface of the GPI cells and were compared with JP09 (and the control JP02, CHO cells expressing the neomycin resistance plasmid but no TSHR). Binding was performed in binding buffer comprised of NaCl-free Hanks’ solution, 280 mM sucrose, and 0.2% BSA. Initially, saturation curves, using increasing volumes of [125I]TSH (Brahms Diagnostica, Berlin, Germany) from 50–500 µl/well and an equal volume of binding buffer, were carried out. Subsequently, the optimized volume of tracer was competed for by increasing concentrations of cold bovine TSH (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 2 h at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with the binding buffer and lysed with 0.5 ml 1 N NaOH/well, and bound radioactivity was determined in a 
-counter. All measurements were made in duplicate and performed at least three times to calculate average EC50 and binding capacity values from Scatchard analysis, reported as milliunits per ml TSH.
Flow cytometry
Seventy to 90% confluent cells (GPI and JP02) were detached from 75-cm2 culture dishes using 5 ml 5 mM EDTA and 5 mM EGTA in PBS. The cells were washed three times in PBS containing 0.1% BSA and adjusted to 2 x 106 cells/ml in the same buffer. Aliquots (100 µl) of cells were incubated with 2 µl heat-inactivated test serum from the various patient and control groups for 1 h at room temperature. After three washes in PBS-BSA, they were incubated on ice in the dark for 30 min with antihuman IgA-FITC conjugate (1:32, from Sigma), antihuman IgE (1:50, from Sigma; 1:50, from Serotec) or antihuman IgG (1:50, from Sigma). They received an additional three washes in PBS-BSA and were resuspended in 1 ml of the same buffer, but containing propidium iodide for gating out dead cells. Cells were also analyzed in the same protocol, but omitting the first antibody (either TSHR monoclonal or patients’ serum) to control for nonspecific binding of the mouse and human FITC conjugates. In addition, 12 of the samples positive for IgG binding to GPI were analyzed further by replacing the antihuman IgG-FITC with either an antihuman 
or an antihuman light chain-FITC.
Flow cytometric analysis was performed on a FACS Vantage from Becton Dickinson and Co. (Mountain View, CA), incorporating a Coherent Enterprise II laser emitting at 488 nm. Forward light scatter, 90° light scatter, and fluorescence emissions were collected for 1 x 10 4 cells, and the geometric mean fluorescence intensity values of GPI and JP02 were compared for all sera, including the normal samples. In addition, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) two-sample test, which gives the greatest difference between the two histograms (GPI and JP02) and is quoted as the D value, was used (26), and cut-off values were defined based on the mean ± 2 SD of the normal sera.
Results
Characterization of the GPI cell line
Surface expression of TSHR ECD was confirmed by flow cytometry. Background staining with an isotype-matched control antibody showed a median fluorescence of 4.03 and peak channel fluorescence of 3 compared with 667 and 889 when using the 2C11 monoclonal (D = 0.93). Similar results were obtained with the other three TSHR monoclonal antibodies tested, which together recognize epitopes at the extreme N- and C-termini of the TSHR ECD and the native conformation of the human TSHR. A typical experiment is shown in Fig. 1A.
|
. The affinity of the ECD TSHR expressed in the GPI cells is similar to that of the full-length TSHR in JP09, with EC50 values of 4.3 (range, 2–6) and 3.4 (range, 3–5) mU/ml TSH, respectively. Scatchard analysis of the GPI and JP09 cell lines produced Bmax values of 76 and 19 mU/ml TSH respectively, indicating approximately 4 times as many receptors expressed at the surface of GPI compared with JP09. Flow cytometry
Each patient or control serum was assayed against both the JP02 and GPI cell lines, because of variable reactivity of human sera with the control receptor negative cell line, e.g. when detecting IgG binding the geometric mean ranged from 14–92. The distributions of fluorescence and background fluorescence were similar for the receptor-negative and -positive populations.
Based on the mean ± 2 SD of the normal control serum, a D value of more than 0.28 was considered positive, and 55 of 65 untreated GD sera displayed specific positive binding to the GPI cell population. As shown in Fig. 2, there was a poor correlation (r = 0.22) between autoantibodies binding directly to the TSHR and TSAB measured in a luminescent bioassay.
|
or light chain restriction in their TSHR binding antibodies. From the mean ± 2 SD of the 12 sera and the difference in D value between and , 1 sample displayed complete restriction, and 7 of the other 11 displayed more binding associated with than light chains, as summarized in Table 2.
|
.
|
.
|
.
|
. Discussion
We have produced a CHO cell line stably expressing the ECD of the TSHR linked to the cell surface via a GPI anchor. The characteristics of the GPI line are similar to those in two earlier reports (7, 8) and indicate that the ECD has an affinity for TSH comparable to that of the full-length TSHR and is sufficient to detect binding of TSHR autoantibodies.
We have demonstrated IgG antibodies binding directly to the receptor in the majority of untreated patients with GD, in agreement with some (8, 10), but not all (9), previous studies that have applied flow cytometric analysis. We found a poor correlation between these direct binding antibodies and TSAB, as reported by others (10). Our data lend further support to the concept that TSAB comprise a small proportion of TSHR autoantibodies. The results also indicate that TSHR autoantibodies in general display a preference for the IgG isotype and that it is not a feature confined to TSAB (1).
The presence of TSHR autoantibodies in GD is not surprising, but we have also obtained positive binding of IgG and/or IgA antibodies to GPI cells in 50% of patients with atypical TED and a small proportion of normal euthyroid controls, all of them women. Binding of IgE antibodies to the GPI cells, apart from 3 of 14 GD sera, was detected only in one 28-yr-old normal male subject and in none of the TSAB/TBII-negative TED patients.
The etiopathogenesis of TED remains a puzzle to endocrinologists, although most of the signs and symptoms can be attributed to an increase in orbital volume as the consequence of glycosaminoglycans production, edema, and fat hypertrophy. A variety of immune cells and cytokines are present in TED orbits, and TSHR-specific T cell lines have been reported (27). Several additional lines of evidence favor the TSHR as a common antigen in GD and TED, as described above. The present study has demonstrated immunoreactivity to the TSHR in a subset of patients with TED previously assumed to be free of receptor autoimmunity. Their euthyroid state is explained by the neutral nature of their TSHR autoantibodies, which lack TSAB or TBII activity. Given the size of an Ig, it is perhaps surprising that an antibody that is able to bind the receptor does not inhibit TSH binding, although this has been reported previously (4), as have TSAB that lack TBII activity (11). Measurement of direct binding TSHR antibodies could be applied to confirm the diagnosis if TED is suspected in an individual negative for TSAB and TBII.
There are a few reports indicating TSHR autoreactivity in normal healthy subjects, including the demonstration of receptor-specific T cell lines (28) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (29). More recently Atger and colleagues (3) applied an ELISA, using a solubilized TSHR preparation to coat the plates, and found neutral antibodies in a surprisingly high proportion of euthyroid controls. In our series of normal subjects, TSHR antibodies were confined to three women, aged 46–52 yr, one of whom displayed both IgG and IgA reactivity.
The idea of autoantibodies in healthy subjects is not novel, and the other major thyroid autoantigens, Tg and TPO, are associated with incidences of approximately 15% and 10%, respectively; they are highest among middle-aged women (2). It seems that the TSHR is not so different, although studies using a larger panel of euthyroid male and female subjects spanning all age ranges are required to determine the prevalence of TSHR autoreactivity in the absence of disease.
GD is very common, and our data imply that immunoreactivity to the target antigen may also be common. Is its immunogenicity due to molecular mimicry of the TSHR by structures on the surface of commensal bacteria, or does receptor processing release/unmask an immunodominant epitope? Immunodominant epitopes have been implicated in a variety of autoimmune diseases, and indeed, there is a suggestion that the development of thyroiditis requires removal of immunodominant regions in a receptor-induced animal model (30).
We were able to detect IgE immunoreactivity to the receptor by flow cytometry in patients with GD and TED. Interest in this arm of the immune response has been kindled by an animal model of TED induced by passive transfer of TSHR-primed T cells, which one of us has reported (16). In this model, mast cell infiltration was one of the earliest indicators of orbital pathology. Development of TSHR autoantibodies of the IgE subclass by isotype switching would provide a neat explanation for the severe TED found in some, but not all, GD patients. Recently, elevated IgE levels have been reported in GD patients, although whether the antibodies were directed to the TSHR was not investigated (20), although IgE antibodies to another major thyroid autoantigen, TPO, have been reported (31). Further studies, using a larger series of patients, particularly GD patients before the onset of TED, are warranted to resolve the issue of IgE antibodies to the receptor.
In conclusion, we report neutral IgG antibodies, predominantly of the class, in the majority of patients with untreated GD and in a small proportion of middle-aged euthyroid female controls. We have clearly demonstrated IgG and/or IgA antibodies recognizing receptor conformation in a high proportion of patients with TED who are negative for TSHR autoantibodies with biological activity measured as TSAB or TBII.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Drs. Costagliola, Banga, and Prabhakar for kindly donating antibodies to the TSHR, and to Drs. Parkes and Lazarus for providing patients’ sera.
Footnotes
This work was supported in part by Brahms Diagnostica GmbH (Berlin, Germany) and grants from the Wales Office of Research and Development and the United Kingdom Medical Research Council.
Abbreviations: ECD, Extracellular domain; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; GD, Graves’ disease; GPI, glycophosphatidylinositol; TBAB, thyroid-blocking antibodies; TBII, TSH binding-inhibiting Igs; TED, thyroid eye disease; TPO, thyroperoxidase; TSAB, thyroid-stimulating antibodies; TSHR, TSH receptor.
Received September 25, 2001.
Accepted January 8, 2002.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. R. C. Baker, M. Morton, R. S. Rajapaska, M. Bullock, S. Gullu, B. Mazzi, and M. Ludgate Altered Tear Composition in Smokers and Patients With Graves Ophthalmopathy Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 2006; 124(10): 1451 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Gilbert, A. G. Gianoukakis, S. Salehi, J. Moorhead, P. V. Rao, M. Z. Khan, A. M. McGregor, T. J. Smith, and J. P. Banga Monoclonal pathogenic antibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor in Graves' disease with potent thyroid-stimulating activity but differential blocking activity activate multiple signaling pathways. J. Immunol., April 15, 2006; 176(8): 5084 - 5092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Baker, G. Mazziotti, C. von Ruhland, and M. Ludgate Reevaluating Thyrotropin Receptor-Induced Mouse Models of Graves' Disease and Ophthalmopathy Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 835 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Latrofa, G. D. Chazenbalk, P. Pichurin, C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport Affinity-Enrichment of Thyrotropin Receptor Autoantibodies from Graves' Patients and Normal Individuals Provides Insight into Their Properties and Possible Origin from Natural Antibodies J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4734 - 4745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. V. Rao, P. F. Watson, A. P. Weetman, G. Carayanniotis, and J. P. Banga Contrasting Activities of Thyrotropin Receptor Antibodies in Experimental Models of Graves' Disease Induced by Injection of Transfected Fibroblasts or Deoxyribonucleic Acid Vaccination Endocrinology, January 1, 2003; 144(1): 260 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |
