help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christian, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christian, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, L. A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 3 1062-1067
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Endocrine Care

Estrogen Status Correlates with the Calcium Content of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques in Women

R. C. Christian, S. Harrington, W. D. Edwards, A. L. Oberg and L. A. Fitzpatrick

Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine (R.C.C., S.H., L.A.F.), Department of Anatomic Pathology (W.D.E.), Department of Health Sciences Research (A.L.O.), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Lorraine A. Fitzpatrick, M.D., Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. E-mail: . fitz{at}mayo.edu

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery calcium, a radiographic marker for atherosclerosis and a predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD), is less extensive in women than in men of the same age. The role of estrogen in the pathogenesis of coronary artery calcification is unknown. We examined the association of estrogen status with extent of calcification and atherosclerotic plaque in coronary arteries of deceased women.

Methods: Coronary arteries were obtained at autopsy from 56 white women age 18–98 yr, 46 postmenopausal and 10 premenopausal. Exclusion criteria included patients with coronary stents, coronary artery bypass surgery, and medical-legal cases. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, CHD risk factors, menstrual status, and use of estrogen replacement therapy. Contact microradiography of coronary arteries assessed true calcium content and atherosclerotic plaque area was analyzed histologically.

Results: The coronary arteries from estrogen-treated postmenopausal women had lower mean coronary calcium content (P = 0.002), mean plaque area (P < 0.0001), and calcium-to-plaque area ratio (P = 0.004) than those from untreated menopausal women. Estrogen status, age, diabetes, and hypertension predicted calcium and plaque area by univariate analysis. After controlling for these CHD risk factors, estrogen status remained an independent predictor of both calcium (P = 0.014) and plaque area (P = 0.001) in all women. Mean calcium area (P < 0.05) but not plaque area (P = 0.44) was significantly greater in women treated with estrogen replacement therapy than in premenopausal women. Coronary calcium (P < 0.007) and plaque area (P < 0.03) varied significantly with age in untreated postmenopausal women, but not in the estrogen-treated or premenopausal women (P = 0.33).

Conclusions: Estrogen status is associated with coronary calcium and plaque area independent of age and CHD risk factors. Estrogen may modulate the calcium content of atherosclerotic plaques, as well as plaque area and may slow the progression of atherosclerosis in women.

ATHEROSCLEROTIC CALCIFICATION OCCURS by an active, regulated process with features common to bone formation (1). Coronary calcium, quantified histologically or radiographically, correlates closely with the overall extent of atherosclerotic disease (2, 3, 4) and is an independent predictor of future coronary events (5, 6, 7, 8). Coronary calcium content is lower in women than in men of the same age (2). Estrogen, which has well-documented antiatherogenic effects (9), may modulate vascular calcification through interactions with the vascular smooth muscle cells, macrophages, and bone matrix proteins found in the vessel wall (10, 11, 12, 13, 14).

The incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in estrogen-replete premenopausal women is one-half to one-quarter that of men of similar age and increases markedly following menopause (15, 16). Observational studies suggest that postmenopausal women treated with estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) have a significantly reduced risk of CHD and less extensive coronary calcification than untreated women (17, 18, 19). However, the role of estrogen in the primary and secondary prevention of CHD remains controversial as its cardioprotective effects have not been confirmed in prospective clinical trials in women with established heart disease (20, 21, 22).

To determine whether estrogen status is correlated with the extent of calcification and atherosclerotic disease in pre- and postmenopausal women, we measured true calcium content and plaque area in intact coronary arteries obtained at autopsy.

Materials and Methods

Study groups

Intact coronary arteries were obtained from sequential autopsies performed at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) on all eligible women (n = 56) whose deaths occurred during the 3-yr period 1997–1999 under a protocol reviewed and approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, IRB No. 0-655-96. Eligible women were age 18 yr or greater with consent for full autopsy and for research use of autopsy specimens. Exclusion criteria included patients with coronary stents, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, use of selective estrogen receptor modulators or bisphosphonates (e.g. alendronate), and conditions associated with dystrophic vascular calcification, such as hyperparathyroidism or chronic hemodialysis. Arteries were not obtained from women whose death occurred as a direct complication of cardiac surgery or catheterization, or in whom acute myocardial infarction was suspected.

Inpatient and outpatient medical records of the Mayo Clinic were reviewed to obtain demographics, menstrual status, estrogen use, and cardiovascular risk factors for each subject. Premenopausal women (n = 10) had a documented menstrual period within one year of death. Women whose last menstrual period or surgical menopause was at least 1 yr before death were considered postmenopausal (n = 46). Estrogen use was documented in the outpatient record and in the admission history and physical exam note of the patient’s final hospitalization to be considered valid. ERT-treated women were current users of oral or transdermal estrogen with or without a progestogen for 6 months or greater at the time of death (n = 13). Postmenopausal women were considered untreated (non-ERT) if they were never users or had been prescribed estrogen <6 months before death.

The coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors documented for each subject included smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and family history of heart disease. These CHD risk factors were defined by these criteria: 1) diabetes mellitus treated with an oral hypoglycemic agent and/or insulin at the time of death, 2) hypertension requiring treatment, 3) smoking if cigarette consumption occurred within 6 months of death, 4) obesity if listed by clinician as a medical diagnosis or noted on autopsy, and 5) family history of CHD if one or more first degree family members were affected. Hyperlipidemia was not included as a risk factor because lipid profiles were collected during subject’s final hospitalization(s) and therefore not reflective of usual health status.

Specimen preparation

The three major coronary arteries, left anterior descending, right coronary, and left circumflex were dissected intact from the heart at autopsy. Specimens were not decalcified during sample preparation to preserve true calcium content. Two sequential one-centimeter segments were cut from the proximal 3 centimeters of each artery, dehydrated in ascending alcohols and embedded in glycolmethylmethacrylate using a temperature-controlled method previously reported (10, 23). Glycolmethylmethacrylate is a hard, clear plastic monomer which allows excellent preservation of vessel morphology and calcium content during preparation of sections.

Contact microradiography

Cross-sections (200 µm) were cut from the proximal end of each arterial segment on an Isomet low speed saw (Buehler, Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL). Each section was placed on a high-resolution emulsion coated glass slide (Microtome Technology, Inc., San Jose, CA) and exposed to radiation for 5 min at 20KV. The section was removed from the slide after exposure and the microradiographs were developed, fixed, washed and dried to the manufacturers’ specifications (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) as previously described (10, 23).

Histologic measurements

After contact microradiography, sections were stained with aldehyde fuchsin and eosin counterstain for optimal delineation of the elastin laminae. Images of stained sections and contact microradiographs were captured under 10x to 20x power using a Nikon microphot FXA microscope equipped with a Progress 3012 camera. All images were captured using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA) and software macros were calibrated using images of a stage micrometer at a resolution of 1996 x 1450 pixels. KS 400 analysis software macros were written to calculate the calcium area and the areas circumscribed by the lumen, internal elastic lamina, and external elastic lamina. Lumen area was subtracted from internal elastic lamina area to give plaque area in square millimeters.

The calcium content of each radiographed section was analyzed by pixel count as in computerized tomography. The pixel count was divided by the pixel size calibration factor ({kappa} = pixels/mm2) to obtain calcium area in square millimeters.

The mean calcium and plaque areas were calculated for each subject from all measurable proximal and distal sections of intact coronary arteries, a maximum of 6 sections per subject. Sections in which the arterial circumference was interrupted or lumen area not well preserved were excluded from analysis. A total of 319 sections were analyzed for calcium area [n = 57 for premenopausal women (PRE), n = 77 for ERT and n = 185 for non-ERT] and 297 sections (n = 46 for PRE, n = 76 for ERT and n = 175 for non-ERT) were analyzed for plaque area.

Figure 1Go demonstrates the methodology used to assess true calcium content and plaque area. Figure 1AGo represents a methylmethacrylate-embedded section of a right coronary artery stained with aldehyde fuchsin and eosin to delineate the internal elastic lamina. The plaque area fills the space between the internal elastic lamina (arrow) and the lumen (white). The black stained areas are calcified, and the yellow and red stained areas are uncalcified plaque. Figure 1BGo is the contact microradiograph of the same artery indicating the calcified area in light green. The dotted outline traced from the stained artery is superimposed on the microradiograph. Digital imaging measured the total calcium content.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Histological specimens of right coronary artery. A 200-µm section of right coronary artery was mounted for contact microradiography. After development of the image, the specimen was stained with aldehyde fusion and eosin to delineate the internal elastic lamina. A, Histological section of coronary artery with a large amount of plaque. The plaque fills the space between the internal elastic lamina and the lumen. The black stained areas are calcified, and the yellow and red stained areas contain uncalcified plaque. The plaque area was measured by computerized planimetry. Plaque area equaled lumen area minus the internal elastic lamina area. B, Contact microradiograph of the same section with the calcified area indicated in light green. Contact microradiographs were captured digitally. Pixels of calcium were counted such that pixel count divided by ({kappa}) = coronary artery calcification (see Materials and Methods).

 
Statistical analyses

Average calcium and plaque areas were calculated for each woman from values on all analyzable sections, a maximum of two sections from each artery, yielding up to six sections per subject. Square roots of the calcium and plaque areas were used for all analyses to stabilize the variance and skewness of the data.

Data are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated. Group characteristics were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum or {chi}-square tests, as appropriate. Linear regression was used to assess relationships among calcium or plaque areas and clinical variables such as estrogen status, age, diabetes, and other CHD risk factors. Significant univarate predictors were evaluated simultaneously via multiple regression analyses. Dummy variables were used to represent estrogen status, with the premenopausal women being the reference group. No difference was found in square root calcium or plaque between the PRE and ERT groups when controlling for age (P = 0.56 and P = 0.84, respectively). Hence, for multiple regression models, the PRE and ERT groups are combined.

Results

Premarin (conjugated equine estrogen) alone (n = 5) or in combination with medroxyprogesterone (n = 4) was the predominant oral estrogen used. Three subjects were on transdermal E2, and one subject was taking ethinyl E2.

Immediate causes of death included pneumonia (n = 20), respiratory failure (n = 16), infection (n = 4), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 4), pulmonary embolism (n = 6), sudden death/arrhythmia (n = 3) or other (n = 3). A history of clinical CHD (myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or congestive heart failure) was documented in 13 of 46 (28%) postmenopausal women and in none of the 10 premenopausal women.

The CHD risk factors and demographic and clinical characteristics of the PRE, ERT, and non-ERT groups are listed in Table 1Go. As expected, the PRE women (n = 10) were younger than the postmenopausal women. No significant difference in age was noted between ERT and non-ERT women. Diabetes mellitus type II (DM II) was more prevalent in the non-ERT than ERT women (24.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.05). The prevalence of other CHD risk factors did not vary significantly between the ERT and non-ERT groups. There were no significant differences in mean years of education, an indicator of socioeconomic status, among the three groups. Women in the ERT group were more than twice as likely to have undergone a total abdominal hysterectomy-bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (9/13, 70%) than women in the non-ERT group (12/33, 36.4%, P = 0.055). The clinical differences we report between the treated and untreated postmenopausal women are consistent with national surveys. In NHANES III, only 6% of current hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users had DM type I or II. The greater prevalence of hysterectomy in the ERT women is also consistent with NHANES III, which found that 75% of women with surgical menopause had ever used HRT, vs. 30% of women with natural menopause (24).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Coronary artery disease risk factors and clinical characteristics

 
Estrogen status, age, diabetes, and hypertension were univariate predictors of both calcium and plaque area in all women; smoking, obesity, family history of heart disease, and osteoporosis did not predict either calcium or plaque area (Table 2Go). In a multivariate analysis, estrogen status, age and diabetes, but not hypertension, were significant independent predictors of plaque and calcium area (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Univariate predictors of square root calcium and plaque area in all women by linear regression analyses

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Multiple linear regressions analysis of univariate predictors of square root calcium and plaque area in all women

 
Mean calcium area was significantly greater in untreated postmenopausal women than in either the ERT (P = 0.002) or PRE groups (P < 0.001) (Table 4Go). Calcium content was 90% lower in women on ERT than in nonusers (non-ERT) (P = 0.002).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) area, atherosclerotic plaque area (Plaque, mm2) and CAC to plaque ratio by group

 
Similarly, mean plaque area was significantly greater in non-ERT women than in either the ERT (P = 0.0011) or premenopausal women (P < 0.001) but did not vary significantly between the ERT and premenopausal women (P = 0.44). We calculated the ratio of mean CAC to mean plaque area for each subject and averaged the ratios in each group. The ratio of mean CAC area to mean plaque area in non-ERT women, 0.25, was significantly greater than the ratio in ERT women, 0.06 (P = 0.0007) (Table 4).

Figure 2Go indicates the amount of plaque (SQRT plaque) in each group (non-ERT, ERT, and PRE). There was significantly more plaque in the non-ERT group compared with the ERT or PRE group (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0003, respectively). Similar findings for calcification are demonstrated in Fig. 3Go. The mean SQRT calcium is greater in the non-ERT group compared with ERT-treated women (P = 0.0003) and was greater in non-ERT vs. PRE (P < 0.0001). We assessed the mean amount of CAC and plaque in each group as a function of age. Coronary calcium varied significantly with age in untreated postmenopausal women (non-ERT, P < 0.007), but not in the ERT or PRE women (P = 0.4) (Fig. 4Go). Plaque area varied significantly with age only in non-ERT women (P < 0.03) (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Plaque area by estrogen status. Graph represents individual data points (square root of plaque area) by group. P = 0.0001 for non-ERT compared with ERT and P = 0.0003 for non-ERT vs. PRE groups. No statistical differences were found on ERT vs. PRE (P = 0.44).

 


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Calcium area by estrogen status. Graphs represent individual data points (square root of calcium area) by group. P = 0.0003 for non-ERT compared with ERT and P < 0.0001 for non-ERT vs. PRE groups. ERT vs. PRE, P < 0.0001.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Coronary artery calcification area by age. This graph represents the amount of coronary artery calcification in PRE, postmenopausal on HRT, and nonusers by age. Coronary calcium varied significantly with age in untreated postmenopausal women (P < 0.007) but not in ERT or PRE women.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. This graph demonstrates plaque area as a function of age in each of the three groups of women. P values were significant only for non-ERT women (P < 0.03).

 
Discussion

This is the first study to examine the association of estrogen status with the true calcium content of atheromatous plaques. Estrogen status independently correlated with coronary calcium, plaque burden, and the proportion of calcium to plaque in both postmenopausal and premenopausal women. These associations were not explained by differences in the distribution of known CHD risk factors (age, diabetes, hypertension), osteoporosis, or socioeconomic status. We found that estrogen use in postmenopausal women was associated with a significantly lower calcium-to-plaque ratio (Table 4Go). Differences in these ratios suggest that calcification and plaque formation may progress at different rates rather than in parallel, and that unique mechanisms may be involved in these two pathologic processes.

Estrogen may modulate arterial calcification, which has many features of bone formation and repair, by interactions with the bone matrix proteins and smooth muscle cells in the arterial wall. The extracellular matrix of atheromas, like bone osteoid, contains the components required for mineralization: collagen type I, bone matrix proteins, such as GLA, osteopontin, and osteonectin, osteoblast-like cells and matrix vesicles (1). Estrogen inhibits the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), which may differentiate into osteoblast-like cells in atheromas, and are capable of calcifying in vitro (25). Estrogen down-regulates TNF-{alpha}, a cytokine found in bone and in atheromas; TNF-{alpha} enhances VSMC calcification in vitro (26). Thus, inhibition of TNF-{alpha} in VSMCs by estrogen may prevent the accumulation of matrix and calcification in vascular tissue. Both estrogen and TNF-{alpha} regulate the OPG/RANK/RANKL cytokine signaling pathway, which plays a major role in both dystrophic and physiologic calcification (27). An animal model demonstrating the role of cytokines in calcification is the OPG-deficient mouse, which develops both osteoporosis and premature arterial calcification (1).

Neither coronary artery calcium content nor plaque area was associated with age in the estrogen-replete women (premenopausal or postmenopausal) (Figs. 4Go and 5Go). In contrast, plaque area and coronary calcium increased significantly as a function of age in postmenopausal, estrogen-deplete women. These data suggest that estrogen, endogenous or exogenous, may inhibit progression of atherosclerosis and associated calcification in aging women.

In our study, users of ERT had only 10% of the calcium area and 50% of the plaque area of untreated postmenopausal women. Our findings are consistent with those of many observational studies, which suggested that estrogen is cardioprotective (15, 16, 17, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32), although secondary prevention trials have not confirmed these observations to date (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33). A causal relationship between ERT use and atherosclerosis would be supported by demonstrating a greater effect with a specific regimen and/or longer duration of use. Our sample size was not adequate to determine how different hormone replacement regimens correlated with plaque and calcium content. A large prospective clinical trial of significant duration is needed to determine the effect of ERT on EBCT-quantified coronary calcium and coronary events.

We can only speculate whether the lower calcium-to-plaque ratio observed in the estrogen-replete women is protective against coronary events, as the effect of calcification on plaque behavior remains controversial. Although the majority of lesions that rupture and cause sudden death are calcified, it is unclear whether calcium makes plaques vulnerable to rupture (34, 35, 36, 37, 38). Regardless, it is well documented that calcified arterial plaques are significantly more likely to dissect or experience restenosis after angioplasty (39).

A strength of our study is the use of human coronary arteries, rather than surgical specimens of the carotid or femoral arteries. We were able to investigate plaque morphology and calcium content in the coronary circulation rather than in surrogate vessels or animal models. A limitation inherent to autopsy studies is the retrospective collection of clinical data. In our study, this limitation was offset by using arteries collected within hours of death from patients at our own institution; this gave us immediate access to medical records from the hospitalizations and outpatient visits that directly preceded death.

Another strength of our study is the application of methods unique to the analysis of calcified tissue (such as bone) to determine the true calcium content of even minimally calcified coronary arteries. First, we did not decalcify specimens during preservation. Decalcification is performed in most histopathology labs to facilitate cutting sections, and results in underestimation of calcium content. Contact microradiography of arterial sections allowed us to accurately measure calcium deposits which were small, scattered, and multifocal.

In conclusion, our data indicate a strong negative association between estrogen status and both coronary calcium and plaque, and suggest that coronary calcification and plaque formation may progress at different rates in the presence of estrogen. In light of the recent controversies related to findings of prospective ERT trials, such as Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (20) and Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis Study (21), understanding the role of estrogen in the pathogenesis of the calcified, atherosclerotic plaque has become increasingly relevant.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of Ms. Ruth Kiefer for excellent editorial assistance, and Ms. Nancy Diehl for data entry. We are grateful to the Bone Histomorphometry Laboratory (Ms. Janis Donovan, Ms. Julie Burgess, and Ms. Donna Jewison) for their expert advice and resources.

Footnotes

This work has been supported, in part, by NIH Grant RO1-HL-51736-5 and unrestricted grants from American Home Products and the Mayo Foundation.

Abbreviations: CHD, Coronary heart disease; DM II, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ERT, estrogen replacement therapy; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; non-ERT, postmenopausal women not treated by ERT; PRE, premenopausal women; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cells.

Received August 6, 2001.

Accepted December 6, 2001.

References

  1. Christian RC, Fitzpatrick LA 1999 Vascular calcification. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 8:443–448[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Janowitz WR, Agatston AS, Kaplan G, Viamonte Jr M 1993 Differences in prevalence and extent of coronary artery calcium detected by ultrafast computed tomography in asymptomatic men and women. Am J Cardiol 72:247–254[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rumberger JA, Schwartz RS, Simons B, Sheedy III PF, Edwards WD, Fitzpatrick LA 1994 Relation of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined by autopsy. Am J Cardiol 74:1169–1173
  4. Rumberger JA, Simons B, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS 1995 Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 92:2157–2162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Kaplan GS, Lee D, Prashad R, Viamonte M, Lamas GA 1996 Electron beam CT coronary calcium predicts future coronary events. Circulation 94(Suppl 1):360
  6. Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Lledo-Perez A, Sherman S, Lerner G, Guerci AD 1996 Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. 19-month follow-up of 1173 asymptomatic subjects. Circulation 93:1951–1953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Detrano R, Wong ND, Doherty TM, Shavelle R 1997 Prognostic significance of coronary calcific deposits in asymptomatic high-risk subjects. Am J Med 102:344–349[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF II, Breen JF, Fitzpatrick LA, Schwartz RS 1996 Electron beam computed tomography and coronary artery disease: scanning for coronary artery calcification. Mayo Clin Proc 71:369–377[Medline]
  9. Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH 1999 The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system: review. N Engl J Med 340:1801–1811[Free Full Text]
  10. Fitzpatrick LA, Severson A, Edwards WD, Ingram RT 1994 Diffuse calcification in human coronary arteries. Association of osteopontin with atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest 94:1597–1604
  11. Donley GE, Fitzpatrick LA 1998 Noncollagenous matrix proteins controlling mineralization: possible role in pathologic calcification of vascular tissue. Trends Cardiovasc Med 8:199–206
  12. Moraghan T, Antoniucci DM, Grenert JP,Sieck GC, Johnson C, Miller VM, Fitzpatrick LA 1996 Differential response in cell proliferation to ß estradiol in coronary artery vascular smooth muscle cells obtained from mature female versus male animals. Endocrinology 137:5174–5177[Abstract]
  13. McCrohon JA, Nakhla S, Jessup W, Stanley KK, Celermajer DS 1999 Estrogen and progesterone reduce lipid accumulation in human monocyte-derived macrophages: a sex-specific effect. Circulation 100:2319–2325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Fitzpatrick LA, Ruan M, Anderson J, Moraghan T, Miller V 1999 Gender-related differences in vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: Implications for prevention of atherosclerosis. Lupus 8:1–5[Free Full Text]
  15. Kalin MF, Zumoff B 1990 Sex hormones and coronary disease: a review of the clinical studies. Steroids 55:330–352[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Bush TL 1990 The epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. Ann NY Acad Sci 592:263–271[Abstract]
  17. Barrett-Conner E, Grady D 1998 Hormone replacement therapy, heart disease and other considerations. Annu Rev Public Health 19:55–72[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. McLaughlin VV, Hoff JA, Rich S 1997 Relation between hormone replacement therapy in women and coronary artery disease estimated by electron beam tomography. Am Heart J 134:1115–1119[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Shemesh J, Frenkel Y, Leibovitch L, Grossman E, Pines A, Motro M 1997 Does hormone replacement therapy inhibit coronary artery calcification? Obstet Gynecol 89:989–992[Abstract]
  20. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E 1998 Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA 280:605–613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Herrington DM, Reboussin DM, Brosnihan KB, Sharp PC, Shumaker SA, Snyder TE, Furberg CD, Kowalchuk GJ, Stuckey TD, Rogers WJ, Givens DH, Waters D 2000 Effects of estrogen replacement on the progression of coronary-artery atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 343:522–529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Mosca L, Collins P, Herrington DM, Mendelsohn ME, Pasternak RC, Robertson RM, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Smith Jr SC, Taubert KA, Wenger NK 2001 Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease. A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation 104:499–503[Free Full Text]
  23. Sangiorgi G, Rumberger JA, Severson A, Edwards WD, Gregoire J, Fitzpatrick LA, Schwartz RS 1998 Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:126–133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Brett KM, Chong Y 2001 Hormone Replacement therapy: knowledge and Use in the United States. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics
  25. Fitzpatrick LA 1996 Gender-related differences in development of atherosclerosis: studies at the cellular level. Clin Exp Pharm Physiol 23:267–699[Medline]
  26. Tintut Y, Patel J, Parhami F, Demer LL 2000 Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} promotes in vitro calcification of vascular cells via the cAMP pathway. Circulation 102:2636–2642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hofbauer LC, Heufelder AE 2001 Role of receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa} B ligand and osteoprotegerin in bone cell biology. J Mol Med 79:243–253[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Bush TL, Barrett-Connor E, Cowan LD, Criqui MH, Wallace RB, Suchindran CM, Tyroler HA, Rifkind BM 1987 Cardiovascular mortality and noncontraceptive use of estrogen in women: results from the Lipid Research Clinics Program Follow-Up Study. Circulation 75:1102–1109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Stampfer MJ, Sacks FM, Salvini S, Willett WC, Hennekens CH 1991 Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease. Ten-year follow-up from the Nurses’ Health Study. N Engl J Med 325:756–776[Abstract]
  30. Barrett-Conner E 1997 Sex differences in coronary heart disease: why are women so superior? The 1995 Ancel Keys lecture. Circulation 95:252–264[Free Full Text]
  31. Sidney S, Petitti DB, Quesenberry Jr CP 1997 Myocardial infarction and the use of estrogen and estrogen-progestogen in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 127:501–508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Fitzpatrick LA 1998 Coronary artery disease in women—an equal opportunity killer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:719–720[Free Full Text]
  33. Fitzpatrick LA, Litin S, Bell MR 2000 The women’s health initiative: a heart-to-HRT conversation. Mayo Clin Proc 75:559–561[Medline]
  34. Wexler L, Brundage B, Crouse J, Detrano R, Fuster V, Maddahi J, Rumberger J, Stanford W, White R, Taubert K 1996 Coronary artery calcification: pathophysiology, epidemiology, imaging methods, and clinical implications. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 94:1175–1192[Free Full Text]
  35. Kullo IJ, Edwards WD, Schwartz RS 1998 Vulnerable plaque: pathobiology and clinical implications. Ann Intern Med 29:1050–1060
  36. He ZX, Hedrick TD, Pratt CM, Verani MS, Aquino V, Roberts R, Mahmarian JJ 2000 Severity of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computed tomography predicts silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation 101:244–251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Kostamaa H, Donovan J, Kasaoka S, Tobis J, Fitzpatrick L 1999 Calcified plaque cross-sectional area in human arteries: correlation between intravascular ultrasound and undecalcified histology. Am Heart J 137:482–488[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Taylor AJ, Burke AP, O’Malley PG, Farb A, Malcom GT, Smialek J, Virmani R 2000 A comparison of the Framingham Risk Index, coronary artery calcification, and culprit plaque morphology in sudden cardiac death. Circulation 101:1243–1248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Colombo A, Anzuini A 1998 Intravascular ultrasound-guided elective stent placement in calcified coronary lesions. Eur Heart J 19:1127–1129



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. N. Hodis, W. J. Mack, M. A. Brouwer, H.-J. Dieker, F. W.A. Verheugt, L. C. Hofbauer, S. Khosla, M. Schoppet, J. E. Manson, M. A. Allison, et al.
Estrogen Therapy and Coronary-Artery Calcification
N. Engl. J. Med., September 20, 2007; 357(12): 1252 - 1254.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. P. V. Dantas and K. Sandberg
Does 2-Methoxyestradiol Represent the New and Improved Hormone Replacement Therapy for Atherosclerosis?
Circ. Res., August 4, 2006; 99(3): 234 - 237.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. C. Christian, P. Y. Liu, S. Harrington, M. Ruan, V. M. Miller, and L. A. Fitzpatrick
Intimal Estrogen Receptor (ER){beta}, But Not ER{alpha} Expression, Is Correlated with Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerosis in Pre- and Postmenopausal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2713 - 2720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. H. E. M. Maas, Y. T. van der Schouw, D. Beijerinck, J. J. M. Deurenberg, W. P. T. M. Mali, and Y. van der Graaf
Arterial Calcifications Seen on Mammograms: Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Pregnancy, and Lactation
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Rzewuska-Lech, M. Jayachandran, L. A. Fitzpatrick, and V. M. Miller
Differential effects of 17{beta}-estradiol and raloxifene on VSMC phenotype and expression of osteoblast-associated proteins
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2005; 289(1): E105 - E112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Y. Liu, R. C. Christian, M. Ruan, V. M. Miller, and L. A. Fitzpatrick
Correlating Androgen and Estrogen Steroid Receptor Expression with Coronary Calcification and Atherosclerosis in Men without Known Coronary Artery Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
T. M. Doherty, L. A. Fitzpatrick, D. Inoue, J.-H. Qiao, M. C. Fishbein, R. C. Detrano, P. K. Shah, and T. B. Rajavashisth
Molecular, Endocrine, and Genetic Mechanisms of Arterial Calcification
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 629 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Abedin, Y. Tintut, and L. L. Demer
Vascular Calcification: Mechanisms and Clinical Ramifications
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(7): 1161 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Miwa, M. Tsushima, H. Arima, Y. Kawano, and T. Sasaguri
Pulse Pressure Is an Independent Predictor for the Progression of Aortic Wall Calcification in Patients With Controlled Hyperlipidemia
Hypertension, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 536 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Maffei, Y. Murata, V. Rochira, G. Tubert, C. Aranda, M. Vazquez, C. D. Clyne, S. Davis, E. R. Simpson, and C. Carani
Dysmetabolic Syndrome in a Man with a Novel Mutation of the Aromatase Gene: Effects of Testosterone, Alendronate, and Estradiol Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2004; 89(1): 61 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. A. Fitzpatrick
Hormones and the Heart: Controversies and Conundrums
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5609 - 5610.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Akhrass, A. T. Evans, Y. Wang, S. Rich, C. R. Kannan, L. Fogelfeld, and T. Mazzone
Hormone Replacement Therapy Is Associated with Less Coronary Atherosclerosis in Postmenopausal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5611 - 5614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Fournier, C. Presne, R. Oprisiu, and T. Sadek
Oral calcium, sevelamer and vascular calcification in uraemic patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 2276 - 2277.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Bidder, J.-S. Shao, N. Charlton-Kachigian, A. P. Loewy, C. F. Semenkovich, and D. A. Towler
Osteopontin Transcription in Aortic Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Is Controlled by Glucose-regulated Upstream Stimulatory Factor and Activator Protein-1 Activities
J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44485 - 44496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christian, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christian, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, L. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals