This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Quon, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Quon, M. J.

QUICKI Is a Useful and Accurate Index of Insulin Sensitivity

Cardiology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Address all correspondence to: Michael J. Quon, Cardiology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 8C-218, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1755, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1755. E-mail: quonm{at}nih.gov

To the editor:

A recent article by Duncan, Hutson, and Stacpoole (1) examined the ability of QUICKI, an index of insulin sensitivity based upon fasting glucose and insulin levels (2), to accurately reflect changes in insulin sensitivity associated with exercise training. In their study, the authors performed an unmodified frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT) with a reduced sampling schedule (14 blood samples) in 15 nondiabetic sedentary adults before and after 6 months of exercise training. QUICKI was compared with SI_MM, an index of insulin sensitivity derived from minimal model analysis of the FSIVGTT (3). Although QUICKI and SI_MM were significantly correlated both before and after exercise training, changes in QUICKI after training were not significantly correlated with changes in SI_MM. SI_MM increased in 12 subjects and decreased in 3 subjects after exercise training, whereas QUICKI increased in 9 subjects and decreased in 6. Based upon this data, the authors concluded that QUICKI does not accurately reflect changes in insulin sensitivity associated with exercise training. While the data presented may be sound, the conclusions are not. The main problem with the interpretation of the data comes from not having a reference standard for insulin sensitivity to compare with QUICKI and SI_MM. When compared with a direct measure of insulin sensitivity such as that derived from the glucose clamp, the correlation of QUICKI with SI_Clamp is significantly stronger than the correlation between SI_MM and SI_Clamp (2). Thus, discordance between changes in QUICKI and changes in SI_MM most likely reflects problems associated with the minimal model approach rather than inaccuracies manifested by QUICKI. Indeed, the implementation by Duncan et al. (1) of an unmodified FSIVGTT and a reduced sampling schedule is quite suboptimal for minimal model analysis. It is well established that the SI_MM derived from the unmodified FSIVGTT does not correlate well with glucose clamp measurements of insulin sensitivity (4). Although modifications to the standard FSIVGTT that add either tolbutamide or insulin infusion significantly improve the correlation between minimal model and glucose clamp estimates of insulin sensitivity (5, 6, 7, 8, 9), systematic errors in minimal model estimates of glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity still remain even when modified FSIVGTTs are employed (10, 11, 12). Moreover, using a reduced sampling schedule of 14 blood samples instead of the usual 30 samples for the FSIVGTT is likely to introduce additional error (13, 14). Because Duncan et al. (1) do not include a reference standard for measuring insulin sensitivity, it is difficult to ascertain from their data whether or not QUICKI is a useful index for following changes in insulin sensitivity after exercise training. However, in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (15) or in obese adolescents (16), QUICKI is able to discern significant improvements in insulin sensitivity after therapy with insulin sensitizers. Of note, close inspection of the data from obese adolescents also reveals discordance between changes in QUICKI and changes in SI_MM in that study (16). Finally, a number of independent groups have found excellent correlations between QUICKI and reference glucose clamp measurements in normal, obese, and diabetic populations (15, 17, 18) as well as in pregnant women and women with gestational diabetes (19). QUICKI is also a useful index of insulin sensitivity in subjects with hyperandrogenism (20), young girls with premature adrenarche (21), and patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (22). In summary, from the fact that changes in QUICKI after exercise training do not correlate with changes in SI_MM derived from suboptimal FSIVGTT data, it is incorrect to conclude that QUICKI does not accurately reflect changes in insulin sensitivity with exercise. Judging by the utility of QUICKI as an accurate index of insulin sensitivity in a variety of other contexts, it seems plausible that QUICKI may also be useful for assessing changes in insulin sensitivity due to exercise. However, QUICKI must be compared with the reference glucose clamp before and after exercise to make a definitive conclusion.

Received October 16, 2001.

References

1. Duncan GE, Hutson AD, Stacpoole PW 2001 QUICKI does not accurately reflect changes in insulin sensitivity with exercise training. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4115–4119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Katz A, Nambi SS, Mather K, Baron AD, Follmann DA, Sullivan G, Quon MJ 2000 Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2402–2410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Bergman RN 1989 Lilly lecture 1989. Toward physiological understanding of glucose tolerance. Minimal-model approach. Diabetes 38:1512–1527[Abstract]
4. Donner CC, Fraze E, Chen YD, Hollenbeck CB, Foley JE, Reaven GM 1985 Presentation of a new method for specific measurement of in vivo insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in humans: comparison of this approach with the insulin clamp and minimal model techniques. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60:723–726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Yang YJ, Youn JH, Bergman RN 1987 Modified protocols improve insulin sensitivity estimation using the minimal model. Am J Physiol 253:E595–E602
6. Welch S, Gebhart SS, Bergman RN, Phillips LS 1990 Minimal model analysis of intravenous glucose tolerance test-derived insulin sensitivity in diabetic subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:1508–1518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Beard JC, Bergman RN, Ward WK, Porte Jr D 1986 The insulin sensitivity index in nondiabetic man. Correlation between clamp-derived and IVGTT-derived values. Diabetes 35:362–369[Abstract]
8. Finegood DT, Hramiak IM, Dupre J 1990 A modified protocol for estimation of insulin sensitivity with the minimal model of glucose kinetics in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1538–1549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Bergman RN, Prager R, Volund A, Olefsky JM 1987 Equivalence of the insulin sensitivity index in man derived by the minimal model method and the euglycemic glucose clamp. J Clin Invest 79:790–800
10. Quon MJ, Cochran C, Taylor SI, Eastman RC 1994 Non-insulin-mediated glucose disappearance in subjects with IDDM. Discordance between experimental results and minimal model analysis. Diabetes 43:890–896[Abstract]
11. Cobelli C, Bettini F, Caumo A, Quon MJ 1998 Overestimation of minimal model glucose effectiveness in presence of insulin response is due to undermodeling. Am J Physiol 275:E1031–E1036
12. Finegood DT, Tzur D 1996 Reduced glucose effectiveness associated with reduced insulin release: an artifact of the minmal-model method. Am J Physiol 271:E485–E495
13. Saad MF, Anderson RL, Laws A, Watanabe RM, Kades WW, Chen YD, Sands RE, Pei D, Savage PJ, Bergman RN 1994 A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance. Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes 43:1114–1121[Abstract]
14. Steil GM, Volund A, Kahn SE, Bergman RN 1993 Reduced sample number for calculation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness from the minimal model. Suitability for use in population studies. Diabetes 42:250–256[Abstract]
15. Mather KJ, Hunt AE, Steinberg HO, Paradisi G, Hook G, Katz A, Quon MJ, Baron AD 2001 Repeatability characteristics of simple indices of insulin resistance: implications for research applications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 86:5457–5464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Freemark M, Bursey D 2001 The effects of metformin on body mass index and glucose tolerance in obese adolescents with fasting hyperinsulinemia and a family history of type 2 diabetes. Pediatrics 107:E55
17. Bastard JP, Robert JJ, Jardel C, Bruckert E, Grimaldi A, Hainque B 2001 Is quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, a fair insulin sensitivity index in humans? Diabetes Metab 27:69–70[Medline]
18. Rabasa-Lhoret R, Laville M 2001 How to measure insulin sensitivity in clinical practice? Diabetes Metab 27:201–208[Medline]
19. Kirwan JP, Huston-Presley L, Kalhan SC, Catalano PM 2001 Clinically useful estimates of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy: validation studies in women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 24:1602–1607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Escobar-Morreale HF, Calvo RM, Sancho J, San Millan JL 2001 TNF- and hyperandrogenism: a clinical, biochemical, and molecular genetic study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3761–3767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Silfen ME, Manibo AM, McMahon DJ, Levine LS, Murphy AR, Oberfield SE 2001 Comparison of simple measures of insulin sensitivity in young girls with premature adrenarche: the fasting glucose to insulin ratio may be a simple and useful measure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2863–2868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Dixon JB, Bhathal PS, O’Brien PE 2001 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis in the severely obese. Gastroenterology 121:91–100[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Keske, L. H. Clerk, W. J. Price, L. A. Jahn, and E. J. Barrett Obesity Blunts Microvascular Recruitment in Human Forearm Muscle After a Mixed Meal Diabetes Care, September 1, 2009; 32(9): 1672 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Pagel-Langenickel, D. R. Schwartz, R. A. Arena, D. C. Minerbi, D. Thor. Johnson, M. A. Waclawiw, R. O. Cannon III, R. S. Balaban, D. J. Tripodi, and M. N. Sack A discordance in rosiglitazone mediated insulin sensitization and skeletal muscle mitochondrial content/activity in Type 2 diabetes mellitus Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2659 - H2666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Chen, G. Sullivan, and M. J. Quon Assessing the Predictive Accuracy of QUICKI as a Surrogate Index for Insulin Sensitivity Using a Calibration Model Diabetes, July 1, 2005; 54(7): 1914 - 1925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Yokoyama, M. Emoto, S. Fujiwara, K. Motoyama, T. Morioka, M. Komatsu, H. Tahara, H. Koyama, T. Shoji, M. Inaba, et al. Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index and the Reciprocal Index of Homeostasis Model Assessment Are Useful Indexes of Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Wide Range of Fasting Plasma Glucose J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1481 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Rabasa-Lhoret, J.-P. Bastard, V. Jan, P.-H. Ducluzeau, F. Andreelli, F. Guebre, J. Bruzeau, C. Louche-Pellissier, C. MaItrepierre, J. Peyrat, et al. Modified Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index Is Better Correlated to Hyperinsulinemic Glucose Clamp than Other Fasting-Based Index of Insulin Sensitivity in Different Insulin-Resistant States J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4917 - 4923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. V. Polyzogopoulou, F. Kalfarentzos, A. G. Vagenakis, and T. K. Alexandrides Restoration of Euglycemia and Normal Acute Insulin Response to Glucose in Obese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery Diabetes, May 1, 2003; 52(5): 1098 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Chen, G. Sullivan, L. Q. Yue, A. Katz, and M. J. Quon QUICKI is a useful index of insulin sensitivity in subjects with hypertension Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2003; 284(4): E804 - E812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W. Hsing, Y.-T. Gao, S. Chua Jr., J. Deng, and F. Z. Stanczyk Insulin Resistance and Prostate Cancer Risk J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 67 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Katsuki, Y. Sumida, E. C. Gabazza, S. Murashima, H. Urakawa, K. Morioka, N. Kitagawa, T. Tanaka, R. Araki-Sasaki, Y. Hori, et al. QUICKI Is Useful for Following Improvements in Insulin Sensitivity after Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2906 - 2908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Quon, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Quon, M. J.