| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Other Original Articles |
Department of Internal Medicine (J.C.), General Clinical Research Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Geriatrics and Extended Care Service Line, Richmond, Virginia 23298; Geriatrics and Extended Care Service (A.G., T.M., M.G.), McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia 23249; Division of Endocrinology (J.P., J.D.V.), Department of Internal Medicine, General Clinical Research Center, Center for Biomathematical Technology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0202; and Endocrine Section (A.I.), Medical Service, Salem Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salem, Virginia 24153
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: J. D. Veldhuis, M.D., Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, P.O. Box 800202, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0202. E-mail: jdv{at}virginia.edu
Abstract
The present clinical study compares the impact of low- and high-dose parenteral testosterone (T) supplementation on daily GH secretory patterns and serum IGF-I, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 concentrations in healthy older (6082 yr) and young (2040 yr) men. To this end, we administered three consecutive weekly injections of randomly ordered saline and either a low (100 mg) or a high (200 mg) dose of testosterone enanthate im; namely, saline (n = 17, young and n = 16, older), a low dose (n = 8 young, n = 8 older) and a high dose (n = 9 young, and n = 8 older) of androgen. To monitor somatotropic-axis responses, blood was sampled every 10 min for 24 h for later chemiluminescence-based assay of serum GH, RIA of serum IGF-I, and immunoradiometric assay of serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations. Data were analyzed via a nested analysis of covariance statistical design. At baseline (saline injection), older, compared with young, men maintained: 1) similar serum total T, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 but reduced IGF-I concentrations, namely, mean (±SEM) IGF-I 160 plus or minus 15 vs. 280 plus or minus 18 µg/liter, (P < 0.001); 2) reduced GH secretory burst mass (0.68 ± 0.09 vs. 1.2 ± 0.20 µg/liter, P = 0.031); 3) more disorderly GH release patterns (approximate entropy 0.501 ± 0.058 vs. 0.288 ± 0.021, P < 0.001); and 4) blunted 24-h rhythmic GH output (nyctohemeral amplitude 0.25 ± 0.05 vs. 0.47 ± 0.08 µg/liter, P = 0.025). Serum T concentrations (ng/dl) did not differ in the two age groups supplemented with either a low dose [550 ± 50 (young) and 544 ± 128 (older)] and high [1320 ± 92 (young) and 1570 ± 140 (older)] dose of T. The 100-mg dose of androgen exerted no detectable effect on GH secretion in either age cohort but increased the serum IGF-I concentration in young men by 20% (P = 0.00098). The 200-mg dose of T failed to alter daily GH production in young volunteers but in older men stimulated: 1) a 2.03-fold rise in the mean (24-h) serum GH concentration (P = 0.0053, compared with the response to saline); 2) a 1.20-fold increase in basal (nonpulsatile) GH production (P = 0.039); 3) a 2.15-fold amplification of GH secretory burst mass (P = 0.0020); 4) a 2.17-fold elevation of the Mesor of nyctohemeral GH output (P = 0.025); 5) a 1.79-fold enhancement in GH approximate entropy (P = 0.0003); and 6) a 40% increase in the fasting serum IGF-I concentration (P = 0.000005). Multivariate statistical analysis indicated that following high-dose T administration, the E2 increment significantly predicted the IGF-I increment in both age groups combined (P = 0.003); T dose positively forecast the serum total IGF-I concentration (P = 0.0031); and age and T dose jointly determined serum LH concentrations (P = 0.031). In summary, neither a physiological nor a pharmacological dose of T administered parenterally for 3 wk augments daily GH secretion in eugonadal young men. In contrast, a high dose of aromatizable androgen significantly amplifies 24-h basal, pulsatile, entropic, and nyctohemerally rhythmic GH production and elevates the serum IGF-I concentration in older men. The mechanistic basis for the foregoing age-related distinction in GH/IGF-I axis responsivity to T is not known.
CROSS-SECTIONAL CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS in pubertal boys and aging men have identified a positive correlation between the serum total, free or bioavailable testosterone (T) concentration and the daily GH secretion rate and/or the serum IGF-I concentration (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12). Interventional analyses further indicate that short-term T administration consistently stimulates GH and IGF-I production in androgen-deficient individuals (13). Although we are unaware of any direct age comparisons, in several studies eugonadal (T-replete) young men showed little or no somatotropic response to T supplementation (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18).
Little is known about the impact of T repletion on the GH/IGF-I axis in older men. This issue has relevance clinically, inasmuch as the systemic availabilities of T and GH/IGF-I decline in parallel in the aging male (3, 4, 5, 6, 19, 20, 21, 22). Accordingly, the present study compares the impact of graded (two-dose) T supplementation on GH dynamics and serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 in older and young men.
Materials and Methods
Clinical protocol
The study was approved by the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center Human Investigation Committee, Virginia Commonwealth University Committee on the Conduct of Human Research, and Veterans Affairs Medical Center Research and Development Committee. We studied a total of 33 healthy male volunteers, namely 17 young (age 2040 yr) and 16 older (age 6082 yr) men. Health was affirmed by detailed medical history, physical examination, and screening blood tests of hepatic, renal, metabolic, hematological, and endocrine function (2, 3, 15, 18). Exclusion criteria included the use of prescription medications; drug, alcohol, narcotic, or cigarette abuse; acute or chronic organic or psychiatric illness; recent transmeridian travel (more than three time zones within the preceding 10 d) and/or any acute weight change (>2 kg in 3 wk). Each subject provided written informed consent and was paid for participation in the study.
The design was a prospectively randomized, double-blind, placebo-(saline) controlled, nested intervention, wherein each volunteer received saline and either a low or high dose of T. Eight young and eight older subjects received 0.5 cc saline and testosterone enanthate 100 mg im weekly for 3 consecutive wk. This dose was intended to produce young-adult serum total T concentrations (23). Nine other young and eight older subjects received 0.5 cc saline and testosterone enanthate 200 mg im weekly for 3 wk to impose a supraphysiological androgen stimulus. Sampling for GH/IGF-I was conducted 35 d after the third injection of saline or T.
Volunteers were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center (GCRC) on the evening before blood sampling. Subjects received a standardized weight-maintaining diet of 55% carbohydrate, 30% fat, and 15% protein in meals served at 0800, 1200, and 1700 h. Lights were put out at 2300 h. After overnight adaptation to the GCRC, an indwelling catheter was placed in a forearm vein to collect blood samples every 10 min for 24 h (0800 to 0800 h). Volunteers were allowed to ambulate to the lavatory but were not permitted to sleep during the daytime or exercise vigorously. A minimum washout interval of 4 wk was imposed between the saline and T interventions.
Assays
Blood samples were allowed to clot at room temperature. Sera were separated and stored at -20 C. Serum GH concentrations were assayed in duplicate in each sample using a chemiluminescence-based assay with a sensitivity of 0.005 µg/liter (3 SD above the zero-dose tube) and an intraassay precision (coefficient of variation) of 4.68.5% for the concentration range measured here (4, 5, 6). All sera in a given subject (n = 289 samples) were assayed together. Serum total T, E2, SHBG, IGF-I, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-3, FSH, and LH concentrations were measured by RIA (T), chemiluminescence (E2), or immunoradiometric assay. The remainder in a single pool of serum prepared from all 145 samples collected on a given admission, as described earlier (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 15, 24, 25).
Deconvolution analysis
Multiparameter deconvolution analysis was used to quantitate the basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion rate; the number and mass of significant GH secretory bursts; the endogenous GH half-life; and thereby total daily GH secretion (4, 5, 6). Ninety-five percent statistical confidence intervals (CIs) for GH pulse mass were determined by the Monte Carlo support-plane procedure (26, 27, 28, 29).
Nyctohemeral (24-h) rhythmicity of GH release
Twenty-four-hour rhythms of serum GH concentrations were evaluated by regression of a simple cosine function of 1440-min periodicity on each time series (30, 31). We calculated the amplitude (half the difference between the zenith and nadir), acrophase (time of maximal value within the 24-h rhythm), and mesor (mean value about which the cosine rhythm varied).
Approximate entropy (ApEn)
ApEn is a model-independent regularity statistic designed to quantify the regularity or orderliness of a time series (32, 33, 34, 35). ApEn is a single nonnegative number that monitors relative pattern consistency in serial data (32, 34, 36, 37). To compute ApEn, two input parameters are specified, m (pattern length) and r (de facto tolerance). In this study, we used m = 1 and r = 20% of the SD of the individual subjects time series, as validated earlier (33, 34, 35, 38).
Statistical analyses
Baseline (placebo) data in young and older men were compared by the two-tailed Welch t test, which extends the t test to accommodate unequal variance. To assess within-subject interventional effects, we calculated as the ratio of the GH/IGF-I response to supplementation with T vs. saline. The logarithms were analyzed to equalize within-group residual variance. A primary analysis of covariance model was specified to include two classification variables: age (young, older) and T dose (low, higher) and a term to identify any age-by-dose interaction. Analyses were based on restricted maximum likelihood with a multiple comparison type I error rate of 0.05 using the least significant difference criterion. Data are presented as the geometric mean (±SEM) ratios of the response to T vs. saline. Linear regression analysis was used to relate the logarithm of incremental (treatment minus placebo) changes in serum concentrations T or E2 to the primary response variables. Statistical computations were carried out in SAS version 6.12 with the mixed model software of Proc Mixed (SAS version 6.12 SAS/STAT Software Changes and Enhancements, 1996; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
Twenty-four hour serum GH concentration profiles and corresponding deconvolution-calculated GH secretory rates are illustrated graphically for several subjects in Fig. 1
. Serum total IGF-I concentrations (and responses to T) are summarized in Fig. 2A
. Statistical analyses of saline-pretreated subjects (baseline data) revealed that older, compared with young, men exhibited: 1) a significantly lower mean (±SEM) 24-h serum GH concentration of 0.27 plus or minus 0.04 vs. 0.41 plus or minus 0.06 µg/liter (P = 0.024) (Fig. 2B
); 2) a comparable mean (24-h pooled) serum total T concentration of 468 plus or minus 43 vs. 516 plus or minus 34 ng/dl (P = NS) but significantly lower mean T/SHBG ratio owing to a 2.3-fold higher mean SHBG level in older men (91 ± 8.1 vs. 40 ± 4.6 nmol/liter, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3
); 3) a reduced global mean basal (saline-exposed subjects) serum total IGF-1 concentration of 160 plus or minus 15 vs. 280 plus or minus 18 µg/liter, (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2
) but similar serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations (Table 1
); 4) a lower mass of GH secreted per burst (0.68 ± 0.09 vs. 1.2 ± 0.20 µg/liter, P = 0.031) (Fig. 4
); 5) higher GH ApEn, denoting more disorderly GH release (0.501 ± 0.058 vs. 0.288 ± 0.021, P < 0.001) (Fig. 5
); and 6) a blunted mean 24-h rhythmic GH amplitude and mesor (Table 1
).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nyctohemeral GH release was appraised by cosinor analysis. A low dose of T paradoxically lowered the mesor and amplitude of 24-h rhythmic serum GH concentrations in older men (Table 1
). However, the high dose of androgen elevated the GH mesor in older men by 2.17-fold [(1.10, 3.83), P = 0.025]. Neither intervention affected the acrophase of 24-h rhythmic GH release.
Discussion
The present clinical study demonstrates that administration of a pharmacological dose of T administered parenterally for 3 wk significantly stimulates basal (nonpulsatile) GH release, augments GH secretory burst mass, increases pulsatile and total 24-h GH production, heightens the disorderliness of GH profiles, amplifies nyctohemeral GH output, and elevates serum IGF-I concentrations significantly in healthy older (but not young) men. Serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations showed minimal alterations over this interval, whereas LH and FSH release was suppressed markedly. An identical T supplementation regimen failed to stimulate any measured end points of GH/IGF-I secretion in young men, except for increasing the serum IGF-I concentration slightly. The foregoing multiple responses of the GH-IGF-I axis in older men to a high dose of T resemble the consistent facilitation of basal, pulsatile, entropic, and 24-h rhythmic GH secretion and concomitant elevation of serum IGF-I concentrations observed in normal puberty and in hypogonadal boys replaced with T (7, 39, 40, 41, 42).
Supraphysiological T supplementation increased serum IGF-I concentrations in older men by 40% and in young men by 20%. Serum E2 concentrations rose concomitantly in both age groups and predicted the incremental changes in IGF-I (Fig. 8
). T also stimulates combined GH and IGF-I production in prepubertal children, hypogonadal middle-aged men, and transsexual women (8, 13, 15, 39, 41, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56). However, estrogen and nonaromatizable androgens typically fail to elevate systemic IGF-I concentrations in the human (13, 15, 39, 56, 57, 58) (Fig. 9
). Thus, why incremental serum E2 concentrations in young and older men given T injections correlate positively with incremental IGF-I production is not clear. One consideration is that other selected in situ estrogenic or androgenic metabolites of T mediate augmented GH and IGF-I output in this setting (14, 48, 59, 60, 61, 62). Although only a single type of AR is known, certain androgenic metabolites appear to exert tissue-preferential effects (23, 63). In addition, recent studies in transgenic mice harboring homologous disruption of the
or ß estrogen receptor gene point to a role for the former in mediating GH IGF-I generation (64). Moreover, in the adult male rat, the
(rather than ß) E2 receptor subtype is expressed in 70% of hypothalamic GHRH neurons (65). These observations allow for, but do not prove, possible selective control of the GH-IGF-I axis via E2 receptor subtype-specific mechanisms.
|
Short-term administration of a high dose of T increased GH ApEn in older men only. This outcome denotes the induction of less orderly GH secretory patterns (35). Comparable changes in GH secretory regularity occur following supplementation with an aromatizable androgen or estrogen in children and/or postmenopausal women (39, 39, 41) and emerge transiently in normal midpuberty in boys (34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 55, 69). From a mathematical perspective, more disorderly GH output indicates altered within-axis feed-forward and/or feedback control (32, 33, 34, 35). In this regard, fixed infusions of GHRP-2 or GHRH likewise drive greater irregularity (elevated GH ApEn) of 24-h serum GH concentration profiles (5, 41, 66, 67, 70). Conversely, injections of somatostatin or IGF-I enforce more orderly patterns of GH secretion (lower GH ApEn) (70, 71). By inference, therefore, T may raise GH ApEn in older men by facilitating endogenous secretagogue action and/or by muting negative-feedback signaling within the GH-IGF-I axis.
The low (midphysiological) dose of T used here increased the mean serum total T concentration by 30% and tended to lower SHBG concentrations in older (but not young) men. These age distinctions may reflect the elevated baseline serum SHBG concentration in older subjects, which can retard the metabolic clearance of T (23). The low dose of androgen also doubled the mesor of 24-h rhythmic GH release in elderly, but not young, adults. Nyctohemeral GH secretion is governed conjointly by nutrient intake, the sleep-wake activity cycle, circadian inputs and hypothalamic GHRH, GHRP, and/or somatostatinergic signals (8, 72, 73, 74). Non-GHRH and non-GHRP signals may be relevant because ectopic tumoral secretion of GHRH or sustained iv infusion of GHRH and/or GHRP-2 increases, whereas loss-of-function mutation of the human GHRH receptor markedly diminishes 24-h rhythmic GH secretion (5, 66, 67, 75).
Maintenance of serum total T concentrations within the young-adult male range for 3 wk in older men elevated 24-h rhythmic GH release but did not stimulate basal, pulsatile, or entropic measures of daily GH secretion or normalize serum IGF-I concentrations. Such observations contradict the a priori hypothesis that relative hyposomatotropism in older men is owing solely to an age-related decline in systemic T availability, at least over the short term. Whether more prolonged and/or more physiological androgen supplementation would be more effectual in older men is not known. Indeed, the precise threshold and/or dose dependency of Ts stimulation of GH and IGF-I output in older men remains to be established.
Short-term replacement of T in physiological amounts stimulates the GH-IGF-I axis in prepubertal boys and middle-aged hypogonadal men (8, 13, 39, 41, 58). In contrast, eugonadal young men fail to respond analogously. Thus, we speculate that responsiveness of the GH-IGF-I axis to androgen repletion may be conditional on androgen dose, age, and/or degree of T deficiency (23, 76).
From a multivariate statistical perspective, age and T dose jointly determined the degree of suppression of mean (24-h) serum LH but not FSH concentrations. Whereas both doses of T inhibited LH release significantly in young and older men, the low does was more and the high dose less effectual in older individuals. The basis for this age-related contrast is not clear but could reflect randomization or selection bias and/or the relatively small size of the study groups. However, other clinical investigations have reported variously normal, blunted, or accentuated androgenic negative feedback on LH secretion in the older male (23, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83). In addition, assuming that the observed decrease in serum SHBG concentrations mirrors the in vivo biological action of androgen, then the greater decline in SHBG observed here in older men exposed to T would point to heightened responsiveness of this hepatic glycoprotein to androgen action (23). Accordingly, further studies of the potency and efficacy of androgen action on selected target tissues will be required to clarify whether and how aging alters the tissue-specific effects of T and/or its principal metabolites.
In summary, parenteral administration of a high dose of T for 3 wk in healthy older men stimulates basal, pulsatile, and total daily GH secretion; heightens the irregularity (ApEn) of GH release patterns; enhances 24-h rhythmic GH production; normalizes serum IGF-I concentrations; and reduces serum LH, FSH, and SHBG concentrations. Serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 levels do not change remarkably. Young men treated in the same manner show suppression of LH and FSH release but only a small rise in serum IGF-I concentrations and no detectable amplification of GH secretion. The precise neuroendocrine mechanism(s) subserving these age-related contrasts and the threshold amount of T required to elicit such distinctions are not known.
Acknowledgments
We thank Margaret T. Kidd for excellent editorial assistance; Paula P. Azimi for the deconvolution analysis, data management, and graphics; Brenda Grisso for performance of the immunoassays; the nursing staff at the University of Virginia and Virginia Commonwealth University General Clinical Research Centers for conducting the research protocols. This focused report necessarily omits many primary references because of editorial constraints.
Footnotes
This work was supported in part by the General Clinical Research Centers of the University of Virginia and Medical College of Virginia, a VA Merit Review grant, and NIH Grant RO1-AG-19695.
Abbreviations: ApEn, Approximate entropy; CI, confidence interval.
Received June 22, 2001.
Accepted October 29, 2001.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Y. Liu, P. Y. Takahashi, P. D. Roebuck, J. N. Bailey, D. M. Keenan, and J. D. Veldhuis Testosterone's Short-Term Positive Effect on Luteinizing-Hormone Secretory-Burst Mass and Its Negative Effect on Secretory-Burst Frequency Are Attenuated in Middle-Aged Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2009; 94(10): 3978 - 3986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Munzer, S. M. Harman, J. D. Sorkin, and M. R. Blackman Growth Hormone and Sex Steroid Effects on Serum Glucose, Insulin, and Lipid Concentrations in Healthy Older Women and Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2009; 94(10): 3833 - 3841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D Veldhuis, D. M Keenan, J. N Bailey, J. M Miles, and C. Y Bowers Preservation of GHRH and GH-releasing peptide-2 efficacy in young men with experimentally induced hypogonadism Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 161(2): 293 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis and C. Y. Bowers Factors Other than Sex Steroids Modulate GHRH and GHRP-2 Efficacies in Men: Evaluation Using a GnRH Agonist/Testosterone Clamp J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2009; 94(7): 2544 - 2550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis and C. Y. Bowers Determinants of GH-releasing hormone and GH-releasing peptide synergy in men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2009; 296(5): E1085 - E1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, K. L. Mielke, M. Cosma, C. Soares-Welch, R. Paulo, J. M. Miles, and C. Y. Bowers Aromatase and 5{alpha}-Reductase Inhibition during an Exogenous Testosterone Clamp Unveils Selective Sex Steroid Modulation of Somatostatin and Growth Hormone Secretagogue Actions in Healthy Older Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2009; 94(3): 973 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, J. N. Bailey, A. Adeniji, J. M. Miles, R. Paulo, M. Cosma, and C. Soares-Welch Testosterone Supplementation in Older Men Restrains Insulin-Like Growth Factor's Dose-Dependent Feedback Inhibition of Pulsatile Growth Hormone Secretion J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2009; 94(1): 246 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, and S. M. Pincus Motivations and Methods for Analyzing Pulsatile Hormone Secretion Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2008; 29(7): 823 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D Veldhuis and D. M Keenan Secretagogues govern GH secretory-burst waveform and mass in healthy eugonadal and short-term hypogonadal men Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 159(5): 547 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, G. A. Reynolds, A. Iranmanesh, and C. Y. Bowers Twenty-Four Hour Continuous Ghrelin Infusion Augments Physiologically Pulsatile, Nycthemeral, and Entropic (Feedback-Regulated) Modes of Growth Hormone Secretion J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3597 - 3603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Paulo, M. Cosma, C. Soares-Welch, J. N. Bailey, K. L. Mielke, J. M. Miles, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Gonadal Status and Body Mass Index Jointly Determine Growth Hormone (GH)-Releasing Hormone/GH-Releasing Peptide Synergy in Healthy Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 944 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Muniyappa, J. D. Sorkin, J. D. Veldhuis, S. M. Harman, T. Munzer, S. Bhasin, and M. R. Blackman Long-term testosterone supplementation augments overnight growth hormone secretion in healthy older men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2007; 293(3): E769 - E775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y. Liu, P. Y. Takahashi, P. D. Roebuck, and J. D. Veldhuis Age or Factors Associated with Aging Attenuate Testosterone's Concentration-Dependent Enhancement of the Regularity of Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in Healthy Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 4077 - 4084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, A. Iranmanesh, K. Mielke, J. M. Miles, and C. Y. Bowers Estradiol Potentiates Ghrelin-Stimulated Pulsatile Growth Hormone Secretion in Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2006; 91(9): 3559 - 3565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Munzer, C. J. Rosen, S.M. Harman, K. M. Pabst, C. St. Clair, J. D. Sorkin, and M. R. Blackman Effects of GH and/or sex steroids on circulating IGF-I and IGFBPs in healthy, aged women and men Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2006; 290(5): E1006 - E1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, and C. Y. Bowers Somatotropic and Gonadotropic Axes Linkages in Infancy, Childhood, and the Puberty-Adult Transition Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 101 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D Veldhuis, D. M Keenan, K. Mielke, J. M Miles, and C. Y Bowers Testosterone supplementation in healthy older men drives GH and IGF-I secretion without potentiating peptidyl secretagogue efficacy Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 153(4): 577 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Kaufman and A. Vermeulen The Decline of Androgen Levels in Elderly Men and Its Clinical and Therapeutic Implications Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2005; 26(6): 833 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, A. Iranmanesh, and C. Y. Bowers Joint Mechanisms of Impaired Growth-Hormone Pulse Renewal in Aging Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4177 - 4183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Farhy and J. D. Veldhuis Deterministic construct of amplifying actions of ghrelin on pulsatile growth hormone secretion Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1649 - R1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. Frystyk, A. Iranmanesh, and H. Orskov Testosterone and Estradiol Regulate Free Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), IGF Binding Protein 1 (IGFBP-1), and Dimeric IGF-I/IGFBP-1 Concentrations J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 2941 - 2947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, L. Farhy, A. L. Weltman, J. Kuipers, J. Weltman, and L. Wideman Gender Modulates Sequential Suppression and Recovery of Pulsatile Growth Hormone Secretion by Physiological Feedback Signals in Young Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 2874 - 2881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P A Rooman, L. O. De Beeck, M. Martin, J. van Doorn, S. Mohan, and M. V L Du Caju Ethinylestradiol and testosterone have divergent effects on circulating IGF system components in adolescents with constitutional tall stature Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 152(4): 597 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Soares-Welch, L. Farhy, K. L. Mielke, F. H. Mahmud, J. M. Miles, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Complementary Secretagogue Pairs Unmask Prominent Gender-Related Contrasts in Mechanisms of Growth Hormone Pulse Renewal in Young Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2225 - 2232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, S. M. Anderson, A. Iranmanesh, and C. Y. Bowers Testosterone Blunts Feedback Inhibition of Growth Hormone Secretion by Experimentally Elevated Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Concentrations J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1613 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Erickson, D. M. Keenan, L. Farhy, K. Mielke, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Determinants of Dual Secretagogue Drive of Burst-Like Growth Hormone Secretion in Premenopausal Women Studied under a Selective Estradiol Clamp J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1741 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis and A. Iranmanesh Short-Term Aromatase-Enzyme Blockade Unmasks Impaired Feedback Adaptations in Luteinizing Hormone and Testosterone Secretion in Older Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 211 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. T. Patrie, K. T. Brill, J. Y. Weltman, E. E. Mueller, C. Y. Bowers, and A. Weltman Contributions of Gender and Systemic Estradiol and Testosterone Concentrations to Maximal Secretagogue Drive of Burst-Like Growth Hormone Secretion in Healthy Middle-Aged and Older Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6291 - 6296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. Y. Weltman, A. L. Weltman, A. Iranmanesh, E. E. Muller, and C. Y. Bowers Age and Secretagogue Type Jointly Determine Dynamic Growth Hormone Responses to Exogenous Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Negative Feedback in Healthy Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5542 - 5548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, A. Iranmanesh, and D. M. Keenan Erosion of Endogenous Testosterone-Driven Negative Feedback on Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in Healthy Aging Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5753 - 5761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Erickson, D. M. Keenan, K. Mielke, K. Bradford, C. Y. Bowers, J. M. Miles, and J. D. Veldhuis Dual Secretagogue Drive of Burst-Like Growth Hormone Secretion in Postmenopausal Compared with Premenopausal Women Studied under an Experimental Estradiol Clamp J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4746 - 4754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Orrego, E. Dimaraki, K. Symons, and A. L. Barkan Physiological Testosterone Replenishment in Healthy Elderly Men Does Not Normalize Pituitary Growth Hormone Output: Evidence against the Connection between Senile Hypogonadism and Somatopause J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3255 - 3260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schurgin, S. Dolan, A. Perlstein, M. P. Sullivan, N. Aliabadi, and S. Grinspoon Effects of Testosterone Administration on Growth Hormone Pulse Dynamics in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3290 - 3297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Y. Bowers, R. Granda, S. Mohan, J. Kuipers, D. Baylink, and J. D. Veldhuis Sustained Elevation of Pulsatile Growth Hormone (GH) Secretion and Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), IGF-Binding Protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and IGFBP-5 Concentrations during 30-Day Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion of GH-Releasing Peptide-2 in Older Men and Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2290 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, W. S. Evans, A. Iranmanesh, A. L. Weltman, and C. Y. Bowers Short-Term Testosterone Supplementation Relieves Growth Hormone Autonegative Feedback in Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1285 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, S. M. Anderson, P. Kok, A. Iranmanesh, J. Frystyk, H. Orskov, and D. M. Keenan Estradiol Supplementation Modulates Growth Hormone (GH) Secretory-Burst Waveform and Recombinant Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I-Enforced Suppression of Endogenously Driven GH Release in Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1312 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Waters, C. L. Yau, G. D. Montoya, and R. N. Baumgartner Serum Sex Hormones, IGF-1, and IGFBP3 Exert a Sexually Dimorphic Effect on Lean Body Mass in Aging J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2003; 58(7): M648 - 652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Blackman, J. D. Sorkin, T. Munzer, M. F. Bellantoni, J. Busby-Whitehead, T. E. Stevens, J. Jayme, K. G. O'Connor, C. Christmas, J. D. Tobin, et al. Growth Hormone and Sex Steroid Administration in Healthy Aged Women and Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, November 13, 2002; 288(18): 2282 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |