help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckway, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckway, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 10 4754-4765
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Original Article

Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Generation as a Measure of GH Sensitivity

C. K. Buckway, K. A. Selva, K. L. Pratt, E. Tjoeng, J. Guevara-Aguirre and R. G. Rosenfeld

Department of Genetics (C.K.B.), Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Pediatrics (K.A.S., K.L.P., E.T., R.G.R.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239; and Institute of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Reproduction (J.G.-A.), Quito, Ecuador

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Karin A. Selva, M.D., Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, 707 SW Gaines Road, Child Development and Rehabilitation Center-Pediatrics (CDRC-P), Portland, Oregon 97201. E-mail: selvak{at}ohsu.edu.

Abstract

A total of 198 subjects were randomized to either high-dose (0.05 mg/kg·d) or low-dose (0.025 mg/kg·d) GH for 7 d; the alternate dose was then received after a 2-wk washout period. Groups included in the study were: normal, GH-insensitive (GHI; homozygous for the E180 splice mutation); heterozygous GHI (carriers of the E180 splice mutation); GH-deficient; and idiopathic short stature.

Serum IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) concentrations (collected on d 1, 5, and 8 of treatment weeks) were GH-dependent, with significant elevation by d 5 of treatment, regardless of dose, in all normal subjects. GHI subjects had low baseline IGFBP-3 and poor or no response to either low- or high-dose GH. Heterozygous subjects, however, did not differ from age-matched normals with regard to IGFBP-3 generation. All GH-deficient subjects had subnormal baseline concentrations of IGFBP-3; most, but not all, were able to generate levels into normal ranges by 8 d of therapy. Children with idiopathic short stature showed a better response in IGFBP-3 generation compared with that previously observed with IGF-I, reaching concentrations in normal range with either dose of GH, suggesting that any GHI in this group is relatively limited to IGF-I production.

For the diagnosis of GHI, the highest sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92%) was found on d 8 of the high-dose GH-IGFBP-3 generation test. Failure to raise both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 lowered sensitivity to 82–86% with low-dose GH, and 86–91% with high-dose GH.

DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN GH deficiency (GHD), GH insensitivity (GHI), and idiopathic short stature (ISS) based on serum levels of IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) has been problematic, because these biochemical parameters may overlap in these diagnoses. In addition, partial GHI has been hypothesized to be an etiology of some forms of ISS, further complicating the spectrum of diagnostic entities for short stature (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Mutations in the GH receptor (GHR) gene, such as the E180 splice mutation in the Ecuadorian subjects of this study, cause classic GHI (Laron syndrome) in homozygous patients. Persons heterozygous for this mutation have not been shown to have a phenotypic effect (6). Other mutations of the GHR, however, have been reported to have a dominant negative effect in heterozygous subjects; yet, it is unclear how often heterozygosity for such mutations results in ISS (7, 8, 9, 10, 11).

The IGF generation test is a classic endocrine stimulation test used to assess GH responsiveness for over 30 yr (12, 13, 14). Since the initial descriptions, the utility of the IGF-I generation test has been investigated in the evaluation and management of various forms of short stature, including the diagnosis of GHI and partial GHI, and for growth rate prediction in patients receiving GH therapy (14, 15, 16, 17, 18). Despite multiple studies, however, there is no consensus on how the test should be performed, including what dosage of GH should be employed and for how long a time (2).

Although initial investigations were limited to IGF-I, IGFBP-3 generation has been proposed to provide additional insight into the diagnosis of partial GHI, especially when used in conjunction with IGF-I generation. Blum et al. (19) reported IGFBP-3 as a more accurate discriminator of GHI from GHD than was IGF-I in such generation tests. Thalange et al. (4) found the difference between basal and stimulated IGFBP-3 more significant than the difference between basal and stimulated IGF-I levels when distinguishing partial GHI from GHD. Cotterill et al. (5), on the other hand, found no significant differences in IGF-I or IGFBP-3 generation in children with short stature, although they did use the test to diagnose individual patients with partial GHI, based on high GH levels and low basal or GH-stimulated IGF-I and IGFBP-3 values.

The current study reports IGFBP-3 generation data in 198 Ecuadorian patients who received courses of both low- and high-dose GH. We have reported recently on IGF-I generation data from this cohort (20). A specific aim of this study is to examine the GH responsiveness of subjects with GHI and their heterozygous relatives, as well as individuals with GHD or ISS, by assessing the stimulated levels of IGFBP-3 in response to exogenous GH relative to that of age- and sex-matched normal controls. Concurrently, the study permits evaluation of several protocols (4 or 7 d of either low- or high-dose GH) for IGF-I/IGFBP-3 generation tests, and the development of normative data for these biochemical markers for children and adults.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects (Table 1Go)

One hundred males and 98 females, all from Ecuador, were enrolled in the study. Normal male and female adults and children comprised 72 of the subjects; 22 were subjects with classic autosomal recessive GHI and, in this population, all due to the E180 splice mutation of the GHR gene; 65 were their heterozygous relatives; 23 were subjects with GHD; and 16 were children with ISS. This is the largest cohort of GHI patients in the world, in a geographically isolated area in the southern region of Ecuador. The E180 splice mutation affects the extracellular portion of the GHR and results in marked reduction of GH binding (21, 22). All 198 subjects were genotyped for the E180 splice mutation, as previously described, and all GHD and ISS subjects were shown to lack the E180 splice mutation (23, 24). One GHD subject had had a craniopharyngioma, but the remainders were idiopathic. Some subjects with GHD also had other hormone deficiencies, primarily TSH, but all were appropriately replaced during the study period. GHD patients were documented to have a GH level below 10 ng/ml upon provocation (insulin and clonidine). All GHD patients were naive to GH therapy at the time of this study. Children with ISS were defined as having a height less than -2 SD with a peak GH level greater than 10 ng/ml.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Subject characteristics

 
Children with GHD or ISS were excluded if they had a chronic disease, a history of active malignancy, psychosocial dwarfism, a skeletal dysplasia, or other identifiable syndrome. Female children with GHD or ISS were documented to have a normal karyotype. Because normal growth standards for this part of Ecuador are inadequate, weight and height characteristics have been expressed as SD values based on the May 2000 revision of the Center for Disease Control growth charts from the National Center for Health Statistics (Ref. 25 ; Table 1Go).

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects or from their parents if the subject was under 18 yr of age. This study was approved by the institutional review board of the Institute of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Reproduction in Quito, Ecuador.

Study design

Within each diagnostic group at enrollment, the 198 subjects were randomized into two groups, differing only by the dosage of GH used initially. Either a low dose (0.025 mg/kg·d) or a high dose (0.05 mg/kg·d) of GH was given for 7 d. Subjects were taught to self-administer sc injections of GH, given each evening. Fasting blood samples were drawn on the mornings of d 1, 5, and 8. A 2-wk washout period followed, and the subjects then received the other dose of GH, with fasting blood samples again drawn on the mornings of d 1, 5, and 8. Recombinant human GH was kindly provided by Genentech, Inc. (South San Francisco, CA).

Assays

The specimens were centrifuged within hours after collection from subjects’ homes or doctors’ offices in Quito, Ecuador, and the sera were removed. They were then shipped on dry ice to the Rosenfeld laboratory (Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR), where they were stored at -70 C until assayed. IGFBP-3 assays were performed using IRMA kits, kindly provided by Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc. (Webster, TX). Samples with values below the lowest or above the highest standard at the dilution recommended by the kit instructions were assayed again at appropriate dilutions, to assure that values fell within the most appropriate portion of the curve. The kit has an intra-assay coefficient of variation of 1.8–3.9% and an inter-assay coefficient of variation of 0.5–1.9%. The sensitivity of the IGFBP-3 assay is 90 ng/ml. Normal adult human serum from a pool of an equal number of 20- to 40-yr-old males and females was used as a standard in all assays.

IGF- I and IGFBP-3 values are expressed in nanograms per milliliter. To convert to Systeme International (SI) units for IGF-I, multiply by 0.1307 to find nanomoles per liter.

Statistical analyses

The normative data were examined for statistical significance by a two-way, repeated measure ANOVA for both males and females of the following age groups: younger than 10 yr, 10–18 yr, 18–40 yr, and older than 40 yr. To compare specific differences between diagnostic groups, we used an unpaired, two-tailed t test. Values were considered significant if P was less than 0.05.

Results

Normative data (Figs. 1AGo and 2Go and Table 2Go)

An equal number of male and female normal subjects, totaling 72, were enrolled; 38 subjects were younger than 18 yr of age, and 34 subjects were older than 18 yr of age. In these and subsequent patient groups, subjects were divided by gender and by age. Thus, even with a total of 198 subjects studied, the subject number in some groups was not sufficient to represent an accurate normal range. We do, however, use these values as the normal ranges for our data, to permit comparisons with the recognition that considerable additional data are required to generate useful normal ranges. In all normal subgroups, serum IGFBP-3 concentrations were GH dependent. Significant elevation occurred by d 5 and 8 compared with baseline, using either the low or high dose of GH (all P < 0.001, except males 18–40 yr of age, P = 0.014; females < 10 yr of age, P = 0.007; and females 10–18 yr of age, P = 0.027). The degree of elevation of IGFBP-3 at d 8 relative to d 5 was not significantly different in any age group, nor was the elevation seen with the high dose relative to the low dose in any age group, with the exception of females 18–40 yr (P = 0.027). Although the rise in IGFBP-3, on a percentage of baseline level, is less than that of IGF-I, the trends seen in these data are quite similar to those reported for the IGF-I values from the same samples (20). Table 2Go provides the mean IGFBP-3 levels for each age and gender group, whereas data are presented graphically showing ranges, ±1 SD, and means of the IGFBP-3 levels in Fig. 2Go. When comparing molar concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, normal children maintain a similar ratio in baseline and post GH, whereas, in adults, more IGF-I is generated relative to IGFBP-3, as evidenced by the change in slope (Fig. 1AGo).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Correlation between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 serum concentrations (expressed in nanomoles/liter) at baseline, at d 5 on the low dose of GH, and at d 8 on the high dose of GH for the following subject groups: A1, normal children (Norm Child); A2, normal adults; and A3, heterozygous (Het) carriers of E180 splice mutation. B, Correlation between IGF-I and IGFBP-3 serum concentrations (expressed in nanomoles/liter) at baseline, at d 5 on the low dose of GH, and at d 8 on the high dose of GH for the following subject groups: B1, GHI due to E180 splice mutation; B2, GHD; and B3, ISS. Slope and r2 values are given for each individual graph. BP3, IGFBP-3.

 


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Box-whisker graphs of IGFBP-3 generation tests performed in normal individuals divided into subgroups based on age in years (<10 yr, 10–18 yr, 18–40 yr, and >40 yr). Top panel is for normal males, and bottom panel is for normal females. Subjects self-administered either a low dose (0.025 mg/kg·d) or a high dose (0.05 mg/kg·d) of GH, had a 2-wk washout period, and then administered the other dose of GH. Fasting blood samples were drawn on d 1, 5, and 8 while subjects were receiving the GH. Baseline IGFBP-3 levels are d 1 and are shown in white; IGFBP-3 levels on low-dose GH are d 5 and 8 and are lightly shaded; IGFBP-3 levels on high-dose GH are d 5 and 8 and are darkly shaded. For each time point, the low and high points or whisker of each box-whisker represent the minimum and maximum IGFBP-3 levels assayed; the bottom and top of each box are -1 SD and +1 SD, respectively; and the central horizontal line is the mean IGFBP-3.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Mean IGFBP-3 levels (ng/ml)

 
GHI patients (Figs. 1BGo and 3Go and Tables 2Go and 3Go)

Twenty-two GHI subjects, 7 male and 15 female, were confirmed to be homozygous for the E180 splice mutation, affecting the extracellular portion of the GHR. As previously reported, baseline serum IGFBP-3 concentrations were quite low and appeared to show little response to either low- or high-dose GH (26). Of these 22 subjects, only one had a rise in IGFBP-3 greater than 400 ng/ml on d 5 of low-dose GH. This equates to a sensitivity of 95% for IGFBP-3 in the diagnosis of GHI at this time mark and dose (21 of 22 subjects; Table 3Go; Ref. 19). By comparison, IGF-I generation (using a {Delta} <15 ng/ml) had a sensitivity of only 86% (19 of 22) on d 5 of low-dose GH. On d 8 of low-dose GH or d 5 or 8 of high-dose GH, IGFBP-3 generation had 100% sensitivity, whereas IGF-I generation had a sensitivity of only 82–91%. Both at baseline and after GH, molar concentrations of IGF-I remained low relative to IGFBP-3 (Fig. 1BGo).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Scatter plot of individual IGFBP-3 levels (solid diamonds) assayed in GHI subjects, subdivided into age groups, and superimposed on normal box-whisker graphs as defined in Fig. 1Go. Males are shown in the top panel, females in the bottom panel.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Predictive value of GH generation tests for the diagnosis of GHI

 
GHD patients (Figs. 1BGo and 4Go and Table 2Go)

Twenty-three patients were enrolled, and of these, 17 were under the age of 18 yr. All GHD subjects had low baseline serum IGFBP-3 concentrations for age (314–2784 ng/ml). Most GHD subjects, but clearly not all, were able to generate IGFBP-3 levels into the normal baseline ranges after a week of low- or high-dose GH. After 7 d of high-dose GH, however, four subjects still had not achieved stimulated IGFBP-3 concentrations equivalent to baseline levels observed in normal subjects. Graphs of the IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratios show an increase of IGF-I relative to IGFBP-3 by d 8 of GH, although molar ratios are still not normalized (Fig. 1BGo). In the results reported previously on IGF-I levels, six of the subjects were considered poor responders to GH, defined as an inability to generate IGF-I levels above 100 ng/ml on either d 5 or d 8 of the treatment weeks. However, all of these subjects did have an IGFBP-3 response to GH, with {Delta}IGFBP-3 values ranging from 301-1826 ng/ml.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Scatter plot of individual IGFBP-3 levels (solid diamonds) assayed in GHD subjects, subdivided into age groups, and superimposed on normal box-whisker graphs as defined in Fig. 1Go. Males are shown in the top panel, females in the bottom panel.

 
GHI heterozygotes (Figs. 1AGo and 5Go and Table 2Go)

Sixty-five subjects heterozygous for the E180 splice mutation, confirmed by molecular diagnosis, completed the study. As seen in Fig. 5Go, the majority of baseline and stimulated IGFBP-3 concentrations lie within the observed ranges for the normal individuals in this population. There were no significant differences found when comparing the changes in IGFBP-3 generation of the heterozygotes to the age-matched normals. A few males in the older than 40 yr group had lower IGFBP-3 responses to both low- and high-dose GH than the age-matched normal subjects; these same subjects had demonstrated low IGF-I responsiveness, as well. Noncompliance with the study regimen or an undiagnosed comorbid condition, such as liver disease, cannot be excluded. These results may also reflect the relatively small number of normal subjects in these groups and, furthermore, may be an explanation for a greater IGF-I response to GH seen in some heterozygous males between 18 and 40 yr of age and some females over age 40 yr relative to their age-matched normal subjects. When comparing the ratios of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in normal adults and children and in heterozygous individuals, the slopes of the curves are similar in all cases (Fig. 1AGo).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Scatter plot of individual IGFBP-3 levels (solid diamonds) assayed in GHI heterozygous subjects, subdivided into age groups, and superimposed on normal box-whisker graphs as defined in Fig. 1Go. Males are shown in the top panel, females in the bottom panel.

 
ISS (Figs. 1BGo and 6Go and Table 2Go)

Sixteen children with ISS participated in the study; all lacked the E180 splice mutation of the GHR gene and had stimulated GH concentrations greater than 10 ng/ml. Baseline and stimulated IGFBP-3 levels fell generally within the normal range. This IGFBP-3 responsiveness contrasts with IGF-I results (20), in which many ISS subjects had subnormal IGF-I concentrations and demonstrated a poor to modest response to GH.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Scatter plot of individual IGFBP-3 levels (solid diamonds) assayed in ISS children, subdivided into age groups, and superimposed on normal box-whisker graphs as defined in Fig. 1Go. Males are shown in the top panel, females in the bottom panel.

 
Sensitivity and specificity of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation (Table 3Go)

Table 3Go shows the relative sensitivity and specificity of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation in the diagnosis of GHI, defining a positive test as a failure to raise IGF-I by at least 15 ng/ml, or IGFBP-3 by at least 400 ng/ml after a course of GH (19). IGFBP-3 generation on d 8 of high-dose GH resulted in the best combination of sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91%). Failure to raise both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 resulted in 100% specificity on d 8, but sensitivity was 82% on low-dose GH and 91% on high-dose GH. Thus, some confirmed GHI subjects were able to raise IGF-I by more than 15 ng/ml or IGFBP-3 by more than 400 ng/ml. Conversely, no GHD subject failed to raise either IGF-I or IGFBP-3.

Discussion

The IGF generation test is a measure of the stimulated response of an individual to GH, and can be used to assess levels of GH-dependent peptides, such as IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit. Although the test has been available for over 20 years, we still lack an adequate reference base of normative, gender-specific values for all age groups (27). Studies in the past have examined the test for diagnostic utility in differentiating etiologies of short stature (2), for predicting the response to GH treatment (16, 28, 29), or for examining GH responsiveness in aging, ß-Thalassemia (30, 31), or other conditions, but conclusions have been limited and varied. Initially, investigators examined serum levels of IGF-I as the endpoint (32, 33), but now most include IGFBP-3, as well (4, 5, 18, 19, 34).

We recently reported our results for IGF-I generation in these subjects, of whom almost 200 completed the study (20). In the 72 normal subjects, the IGFBP-3 serum levels mirror the IGF-I levels; they are GH-dependent at all ages. The rise in the levels is significant by d 5 of treatment on both the low dose and the high dose of GH, and again, as with IGF-I, there appears to be little advantage in using the high dose over the low dose of GH or in extending the test to 8 d. However, the longer administration and higher dose provided the most sensitive and specific test in the establishment of GHI within this population. The doses of GH were arbitrarily chosen, reflecting doses commonly used in children, but much higher than those used in adults. Compared with IGF-I levels, however, the relative rise in the levels of IGFBP-3 is less dramatic. This is evident when one examines the molar ratio of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 (Fig. 1AGo). The decrease in the slope from d 1 to d 8 of normal adults shows the larger increase in IGF-I levels compared with IGFBP-3. Interestingly, the children maintain a proportional rise in both parameters.

Blum et al. (19) published criteria for the diagnosis of GHI, including the following: height less than -3 SD, elevated GH, low basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3, and, in the IGF generation test, an IGF-I increase of less than 15 ng/ml and IGFBP-3 increase of less than 400 ng/ml. In our analysis of IGF-I levels, we found 5 of 22 GHI subjects (all proven to have the same E180 splice mutation) had stimulated IGF-I levels that increased more than 15 ng/ml. Of these same five subjects, only one, however, had a rise in IGFBP-3 greater than 400 ng/ml. Thus, using the Blum criteria, the sensitivity of IGFBP-3 to select for GHI is 100% on d 8 of high-dose GH, in comparison to 91% for IGF-I. Each marker is specific on d 8 of high-dose GH (97% for IGF-I, 92% for IGFBP-3), and in our cohort, their combined use was 100% sensitive and 90% specific, when analyzing the 61 subjects with a height less than -2 SD (all GHI, GHD, and ISS subjects included) on d 8 of high-dose GH. Thus, 22 of 22 GHI subjects failed to raise either IGF-I or IGFBP-3 on d 8 of high-dose GH; 35 of 39 GHD and ISS subjects raised either IGF-I or IGFBP-3 or both. We recommend, therefore, analyzing GH-stimulated levels of both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 if one is suspicious of GHI in a patient with significant short stature. Recently, the utility of the generation of IGF-I/IGFBP-3 in short stature has been challenged, due to concerns about reproducibility (35). These authors performed two separate IGF generation tests, spaced 1–22 months apart, in 12 children with ISS. They found poor reproducibility in terms of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation, with several of their subjects failing the Blum criteria on one or both of the IGF generation tests. Examination of data from our study, however indicates significant correlation between the two different generation tests in the normals, heterozygotes, GHI, and GHD subjects. Only in patients with ISS was poor reproducibility in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation observed, a subject which clearly warrants further study and analysis (manuscript in preparation).

Of the GHD subjects, there were six who had a poor IGF-I response to GH, failing to raise their serum levels above 100 ng/ml. IGFBP-3 levels, in contrast, were substantially elevated in all of these subjects, with the exception of one subject on low-dose GH ({Delta}IGFBP-3 of 301 ng/ml). The one previously reported GHD subject, with a {Delta}IGF-I level less than 15 ng/ml, had a {Delta}IGFBP-3 value of 617 ng/ml by d 5 and of 1010 ng/ml by d 8 on high-dose GH. The six GHD subjects who had relatively poor IGF-I responses are examples of patients who may require close monitoring of GH therapy, with consideration given to changes in dose based on their growth velocity and IGF-I levels. In these patients, IGFBP-3 may prove to be a useful marker of compliance, and IGF-I a measure of optimal hormone replacement. In general, the molar ratio graphs of IGF-I to IGFBP-3 nicely show a trend to normal in GHD subjects while they were receiving GH replacement. It is of interest that IGFBP-3 more quickly normalizes than does IGF-I in response to GH; only four subjects had values less than normal baseline values by d 8 on the high-dose of GH.

No biochemical or phenotypic effect is seen in the E180 splice heterozygous subjects. The IGF-I levels clearly overlapped the normal profiles, as do the IGFBP-3 concentrations shown in this study. Given this biochemical profile, the slight difference in height seen in this cohort of E180 splice carriers compared with normal Ecuadorian controls may be due simply to chance, rather than reflect an effect of heterozygosity for the mutation. Importantly, however, the conclusions drawn from these data should only be applied to the effect of heterozygosity for the E180 splice mutation. Although classic GHI due to homozygosity or compound heterozygosity for mutations of the GHR gene is rare, over 30 different mutations and gene deletions have been identified in such patients (22). Some of these mutations clearly can act in a dominant negative manner, because dimerization of the GHR is required for transmission of the GH-stimulated signal. Partial GHI may, furthermore, produce a variable phenotypic effect (7, 8, 9, 10). The IGF generation test (both for IGF-I and IGFBP-3) is necessary to identify and to characterize patients with GHI, complete or partial, classic or atypical.

The combined IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation test may be particularly useful in distinguishing patients with ISS from GHD or GHI. The 16 children with ISS who completed this study had basal and generated IGF-I levels in the lower half of normal or below the normal range. In comparison, their baseline and stimulated IGFBP-3 levels were completely within normal ranges. These subjects are obviously not classically GHD, because they passed provocative GH tests and have normal basal concentrations of IGFBP-3; on the other hand, they may be relatively GHD, because they do not have enough GH to elevate IGF-I levels to entirely age-appropriate values. Alternatively, their relative IGF-I deficiency may represent a form of partial GHI characterized by poor IGF-I production, possibly reflecting a post-receptor defect. ISS is a heterogeneous group, and hopefully, over the next few years, we will begin to unravel some of the etiologies, such as post-receptor signaling defects and other gene mutations (36, 37, 38).

Use of the IGF generation test, including both IGF-I and IGFBP-3, will aid us in the diagnosis, management, and understanding of patients with disorders of the GH-IGF axis. It is safe and relatively simple to perform. Although the low-dose (0.025 mg/kg·d) GH for 4 d with fasting blood samples drawn at baseline and the morning after the fourth dose appears to be adequate in most instances, high-dose GH stimulation for 7 d appears to improve test sensitivity and specificity. The utility of longer tests (e.g. 2–4 wk) warrants evaluation. Furthermore, these results would suggest that monitoring of serum concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 in patients receiving GH might be useful in optimizing therapy. Future research should investigate the IGF-I response, the IGFBP-3 response, and ratios of IGF-I to IGFBP-3 in response to GH, with correlation of these parameters to growth velocity while on GH therapy.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

This work was funded by grants from the Genentech Foundation for Growth and Development (to R.G.R.) and National Institutes of Health Grants CA-58110 and DK-51513 (to R.G.R.) and 5T32-HD07497 (to C.K.B. and K.S.).

Abbreviations: GHD, GH-deficient or GH deficiency; GHI, GH-insensitive or GH insensitivity; GHR, GH receptor; IGFBP-3, IGF binding protein-3; ISS, idiopathic short stature.

Received January 16, 2002.

Accepted July 10, 2002.

References

  1. Carlsson LM, Attie KM, Compton PG, Vitangcol RV, Merimee TJ 1994 Reduced concentration of serum growth hormone-binding protein in children with idiopathic short stature. National Cooperative Growth Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78:1325–1330[Abstract]
  2. Cotterill AM, Camacho-Hubner C, Woods K, Martinelli C, Duquesnoy P, Savage MO 1994 The insulin-like growth factor I generation test in the investigation of short stature. Acta Paediatr Suppl 399:128–130[Medline]
  3. Attie KM, Carlsson LM, Rundle AC, Sherman BM 1995 Evidence for partial growth hormone insensitivity among patients with idiopathic short stature. The National Cooperative Growth Study. J Pediatr 127:244–250[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Thalange NK, Price DA, Gill MS, Whatmore AJ, Addison GM, Clayton PE 1996 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 generation: an index of growth hormone insensitivity. Pediatr Res 39:849–855[Medline]
  5. Cotterill AM, Camacho-Hubner C, Duquesnoy P, Savage MO 1998 Changes in serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations during the IGF-I generation test performed prospectively in children with short stature. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 48:719–724[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Rosenbloom AL, Guevara-Aguirre J, Berg MA, Francke U 1998 Stature in Ecuadorians heterozygous for growth hormone receptor gene E180 splice mutation does not differ from that of homozygous normal relatives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:2373–2375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Goddard AD, Covello R, Luoh SM, Clackson T, Attie KM, Gesundheit N, Rundle AC, Wells JA, Carlsson LM 1995 Mutations of the growth hormone receptor in children with idiopathic short stature. The Growth Hormone Insensitivity Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:1093–1098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Rosenfeld RG 1995 Broadening the growth hormone insensitivity syndrome. N Engl J Med 333:1145–1146[Free Full Text]
  9. Ayling RM, Ross R, Towner P, Von Laue S, Finidori J, Moutoussamy S, Buchanan CR, Clayton PE, Norman MR 1997 A dominant-negative mutation of the growth hormone receptor causes familial short stature. Nat Genet 16:13–14[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Goddard AD, Dowd P, Chernausek S, Geffner M, Gertner J, Hintz R, Hopwood N, Kaplan S, Plotnick L, Rogol A, Rosenfield R, Saenger P, Mauras N, Hershkopf R, Angulo M, Attie K 1997 Partial growth-hormone insensitivity: the role of growth-hormone receptor mutations in idiopathic short stature. J Pediatr 131:S51–S55
  11. Johnston LB, Savage MO 1999 Partial growth hormone insensitivity. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 12(Suppl 1):251–257
  12. Daughaday WH, Laron Z, Pertzelan A, Heins JN 1969 Defective sulfation factor generation: a possible etiological link in dwarfism? Trans Assoc Am Physicians 82:129–138[Medline]
  13. Laron Z, Pertzelan A, Karp M, Kowadlo-Silbergeld A, Daughaday WH1971 Administration of growth hormone to patients with familial dwarfism with high plasma immunoreactive growth hormone: measurement of sulfation factor, metabolic, and linear growth responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 332–342
  14. Rudman D, Kutner MH, Blackston RD, Cushman RA, Bain RP, Patterson JH 1981 Children with normal-variant short stature: treatment with human growth hormone for six months. N Engl J Med 305:123–131[Abstract]
  15. Van Vliet G, Styne DM, Kaplan SL, Grumbach MM 1983 Growth hormone treatment for short stature. N Engl J Med 309:1016–1022[Abstract]
  16. Plotnick LP, Van Meter QL, Kowarski AA 1983 Human growth hormone treatment of children with growth failure and normal growth hormone levels by immunoassay: lack of correlation with somatomedin generation. Pediatrics 71:324–327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gertner JM, Genel M, Gianfredi SP, Hintz RL, Rosenfeld RG, Tamborlane WV, Wilson DM 1984 Prospective clinical trial of human growth hormone in short children without growth hormone deficiency. J Pediatr 104:172–176[Medline]
  18. Schwarze CP, Wollmann HA, Binder G, Ranke MB 1999 Short-term increments of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF- binding protein-3 predict the growth response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in GH-sensitive children. Acta Paediatr Suppl 88:200–208[Medline]
  19. Blum WF, Cotterill AM, Postel-Vinay MC, Ranke MB, Savage MO, Wilton P 1994 Improvement of diagnostic criteria in growth hormone insensitivity syndrome: solutions and pitfalls. Pharmacia Study Group on Insulin-like Growth Factor I Treatment in Growth Hormone Insensitivity Syndromes. Acta Paediatr Suppl 399:117–124[Medline]
  20. Buckway CK, Guevara-Aguirre J, Pratt KL, Burren CP, Rosenfeld RG 2001 The IGF-I generation test revisited: a marker of GH sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5176–5183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Rosenbloom AL, Guevara-Aguirre J 1994 PRISMATIC case: bienvenidos a mi tierra de soledad: from poetry to molecular biology in southern Ecuador. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:695–702[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Rosenbloom AL 1999 IGF-I deficiency due to GH receptor deficiency. Horm Metab Res 31:161–171[Medline]
  23. Berg MA, Guevara-Aguirre J, Rosenbloom AL, Rosenfeld RG, Francke U 1992 Mutation creating a new splice site in the growth hormone receptor genes of 37 Ecuadorean patients with Laron syndrome. Hum Mutat 1:24–32[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Berg MA, Peoples R, Perez-Jurado L, Guevara-Aguirre J, Rosenbloom AL, Laron Z, Milner RD, Francke U 1994 Receptor mutations and haplotypes in growth hormone receptor deficiency: a global survey and identification of the Ecuadorean E180splice mutation in an Oriental Jewish patient. Acta Paediatr Suppl 399:112–114[Medline]
  25. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL 2000 CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data 8:1–27
  26. Guevara-Aguirre J, Rosenbloom AL, Fielder PJ, Diamond FB, Rosenfeld RG 1993 Growth hormone receptor deficiency in Ecuador: clinical and biochemical phenotype in two populations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:417–423[Abstract]
  27. Rosenfeld RG, Buckway CK 2001 Growth hormone insensitivity syndromes: lessons learned and opportunities missed. Horm Res 55:36–39
  28. Rosenfeld RG, Kemp SF, Hintz RL 1981 Constancy of somatomedin response to growth hormone treatment of hypopituitary dwarfism, and lack of correlation with growth rate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 53:611–617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Albertsson-Wikland K, Hall K 1987 Growth hormone treatment in short children: relationship between growth and serum insulin-like growth factor I and II levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65:671–678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lieberman SA, Mitchell AM, Marcus R, Hintz RL, Hoffman AR 1994 The insulin-like growth factor I generation test: resistance to growth hormone with aging and estrogen replacement therapy. Horm Metab Res 26:229–233[Medline]
  31. Chrysis DC, Alexandrides TK, Koromantzou E, Georgopoulos N, Vassilakos P, Kiess W, Kratsch J, Beratis NG, Spiliotis BE 2001 Novel application of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation tests in the diagnosis of growth hormone axis disturbances in children with ß-thalassaemia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 54:253–259[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Copeland KC, Underwood LE, Van Wyk JJ 1980 Induction of immunoreactive somatomedin C human serum by growth hormone: dose-response relationships and effect on chromatographic profiles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 50:690–697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kemp SF, Rosenfeld RG, Liu F, Gaspich S, Hintz RL 1981 Acute somatomedin response to growth hormone: radioreceptor assay versus radioimmunoassay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 52:616–621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Burren CP, Woods KA, Rose SJ, Tauber M, Price DA, Heinrich U, Gilli G, Razzaghy-Azar M, Al-Ashwal A, Crock PA, Rochiccioli P, Yordam N, Ranke MB, Chatelain PG, Preece MA, Rosenfeld RG, Savage MO 2001 Clinical and endocrine characteristics in atypical and classical growth hormone insensitivity syndrome. Horm Res 55:125–130[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Jorge AA, Souza SC, Arnhold IJ, Mendonca BB 2002 Poor reproducibility of IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 generation test in children with short stature and normal coding region of the GH receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:469–472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Clayton PE, Freeth JS, Whatmore AJ, Ayling RM, Norman MR, Silva CM 1999 Signal transduction defects in growth hormone insensitivity. Acta Paediatr Suppl 88:174–178; discussion 179[Medline]
  37. Attie KM 2000 Genetic studies in idiopathic short stature. Curr Opin Pediatr 12:400–404[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Lopez-Bermejo A, Buckway CK, Rosenfeld RG 2000 Genetic defects of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 11:39–49[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
F. Peter, C. Savoy, H.-J. Ji, M. Juhasz, M. Bidlingmaier, and P. Saenger
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of a new sustained-release GH formulation, LB03002, in children with GH deficiency
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2009; 160(3): 349 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. F. Collett-Solberg, M. Misra, and on behalf of the Drug and Therapeutics Committee o
The Role of Recombinant Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I in Treating Children with Short Stature
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 10 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. O. Reiter, D. A. Price, P. Wilton, K. Albertsson-Wikland, and M. B. Ranke
Effect of Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment on the Near-Final Height of 1258 Patients with Idiopathic GH Deficiency: Analysis of a Large International Database
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2047 - 2054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Lofqvist, E. Andersson, L. Gelander, S. Rosberg, L. Hulthen, W. F. Blum, and K. A. Wikland
Reference Values for Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and the Ratio of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I to IGFBP-3 throughout Childhood and Adolescence
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2005; 90(3): 1420 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Coutant, F. B. de Casson, S. Rouleau, O. Douay, E. Mathieu, F. Gatelais, N. Bouhours-Nouet, C. Voinot, M. Audran, and J. M. Limal
Divergent Effect of Endogenous and Exogenous Sex Steroids on the Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Response to Growth Hormone in Short Normal Adolescents
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6185 - 6192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckway, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buckway, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenfeld, R. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals