help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinhas-Hamiel, O.
Right arrow Articles by Achiron, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinhas-Hamiel, O.
Right arrow Articles by Achiron, R.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 10 4547-4553
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Original Article

Prenatal Diagnosis of Sex Differentiation Disorders: The Role of Fetal Ultrasound

Orit Pinhas-Hamiel, Yaron Zalel, Eric Smith, Ram Mazkereth, Ayala Aviram, Shlomo Lipitz and Reuven Achiron

Pediatric Endocrinology and Neonatology Unit (O.P.-H., R.M.) and Prenatal Ultrasound Unit (Y.Z., A.A., S.L., R.A.), Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan 52621, Israel; and Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine (E.S.), Cincinnati, Ohio 45267

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Orit Pinhas-Hamiel, M.D., Pediatric Endocrinology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, 52621, Israel. E-mail: hamiels{at}netvision.net.il.

Abstract

We describe our experience with prenatal diagnosis of sex differentiation disorders, with focus on the role of ultrasound scans for coherent assessment of prenatal diagnosis. Over a 5-yr period all cases suspected of sexual ambiguity based on abnormal ultrasonographic scans (US) or US/genotype US discrepancy were evaluated prenatally by three modalities: 1) repeated fetal US; 2) genetic studies, primarily karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of sex-determining region on the Y gene (SRY); and 3) hormonal assays of amniotic fluid.

Of approximately 10,000 gestations, 16 fetuses underwent prenatal evaluation. Twelve were referred because of an abnormal US and 4 because of genotype-phenotype discrepancy. Five fetuses were diagnosed with female pseudohermaphroditism (21-hydroxylase deficiency in 3 and urorectal septum malformation sequence in 2). Four fetuses were diagnosed with male pseudohermaphroditism (1 with steroid sulfatase deficiency, 1 with presumed camptomelic dysplasia, and 2 undetermined). Five cases had chromosomal abnormalities, and 2 had 46,XX+SRY sex reversal. In all genetic females the uterus was observed on US. In 11 cases initial US scan was performed at 13–15 wk; in 7 of 11, although the initial scan was normal, a repeated scan later in gestation revealed an abnormality.

Repeated US scans performed at 13–15 and 22–24 wk gestation are a helpful tool in prenatal diagnosis of sex differentiation disorders. Our data suggest that both size and structure anomalies of the reproductive structures may evolve throughout pregnancy, and that they represent a developmental biological process rather than a single nonprogressive pathological event. US scan after approximately 19 wk enables detection of the uterus and provides pivotal information in cases of ambiguity. If the uterus appears normal, the most likely diagnosis is a virilized karyotypic female. Prenatal diagnosis allows for early parental counseling and anticipation of medical management postnatally.

WITH THE RECENT advances in prenatal diagnosis, particularly, prenatal ultrasound (US) techniques, a variety of fetal genitalia abnormalities can be detected as early as 13–16 wk of pregnancy (1, 2). At the same time, the widespread use of genetic amniocentesis has resulted in an increased number of mismatches between the chromosome analysis, often performed routinely for reasons not primarily related to gender issues, and the genital anatomy on US (phenotype-genotype discrepancies) (3). Endocrinologists may be more often consulted for prenatal workup of ambiguity. The current literature, however, focuses largely on postnatal evaluation, and only limited guidelines on in utero investigation are available (4). The recent identification of many of the genes involved in sex differentiation and the newly developed ability to measure key mediating hormones have made it possible for multidisciplinary teams to conduct a carefully planned prenatal evaluation and provide informed parental counseling. We describe our experience with prenatal diagnosis of sex differentiation disorders in 16 cases.

Subjects and Methods

In Israel, the national health insurance system provides funding for at least one ultrasonographic scan, usually at midgestation, for every pregnant woman. In addition, early transvaginal sonography, initially performed primarily in high risk cases, is being performed in an increasing number of low risk patients on a voluntary basis. An additional US examination is usually performed during the third trimester for evaluation of fetal growth and well-being.

The prenatal diagnostic US unit of Sheba Medical Center in Israel performs routine fetal evaluations and serves as a tertiary center for antenatal counseling. From 1996 to 2000, about 10,000 pregnant women underwent routine fetal evaluation at the unit. In this study we prospectively followed those pregnancies that met one of the following criteria: 1) ambiguous findings on early US performed at 12–15 wk, 2) ambiguous findings on midgestation US after a normal early US, 3) ambiguous findings on routine midgestation US, or 4) discrepant US/genotype.

Because blood and amniotic fluid analyses are routinely required to determine the nature of these ambiguities independent of any prospective study, no specific informed consent was considered necessary by our institutional ethics committee. All pregnant women enrolled in the study had already signed an informed consent for both the US scans and the amniocentesis. The Sheba Medical Center Termination of Pregnancy Committee, which is subject to the Israeli civil law, approved all abortions. A single observer (R.A.) scanned all the cases, and a multidisciplinary team consisting of an obstetrician, geneticist, pediatric endocrinologist, neonatologist, and pediatric surgeon assessed the results. Prenatal evaluation of the fetuses suspected of having genital maldevelopment or sex discordance consisted of three modalities:

1. Fetal US examination (FUE)

A detailed evaluation of the fetal reproductive structures, including the pelvic organs, was performed, in addition to a systemic examination to rule out associated somatic anomalies. In 46,XX fetuses, the FUE included a demonstration of the labia and clitoris and, after 19 wk gestation, the uterus (5). The fetal uterus can be demonstrated on lower pelvic transverse scan as an echogenic mass between two anechoic structures, the bladder anteriorly and the rectum posteriorly, and its diameters can be correlated with gestational age (Fig. 1Go). In 46,XY fetuses, penile length and scrotal dimensions were correlated with gestational age (6). After 25 wk gestation an attempt was made to document testicular descent (7).



View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The fetal uterus (*) can be demonstrated on lower pelvic transverse scan as an echogenic mass between the bladder (B) anteriorly and the rectum (R) posteriorly.

 
The initial US determination of fetal genitalia was based on the transvaginal examination performed between 13 and 15 wk gestation. As early as 10–11 wk gestation, the phallic structure can be visualized on midline sagittal view (6). The structurally normal penis has an upward projection, and the clitoris has a downward orientation (sagittal sign; Fig. 2Go) (8). As pregnancy progresses, penile size becomes measurable in terms of normal range, and the scrotum can be identified as a distinct structure (6). By 15 wk gestation the female labia may be visualized on angled coronal axial view as multiple parallel linear echo patterns. These later become more prominent, and the labia can be readily distinguished from the scrotum by the midline cleft separating the labial folds (9). Thus, determination of gender requires unequivocal visualization of the labia and clitoris or the penis and scrotum beyond 16 wk.



View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Typical downward inclination of the female clitoris in sagittal section (perpendicular arrowhead). B, Typical male genitalia with the phallus pointing upward (horizontal arrowhead).

 
2. Genetic examination (GE)

GE was performed by chorionic villous biopsy, amniocentesis, or umbilical cord sampling. No side-effects related to the invasive procedures were detected. Genetic studies included chromosomal analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the SRY gene. FISH was performed according to Vysis (Naperville, IL) protocols for direct-labeled probes: LSI SRY (Yp11.3) Spectrum Orange/CEP X Spectrum Green, CEP Y ({alpha} Satellite) Spectrum Orange, and CEP Y Sat III: Spectrum Orange (10).

3. Hormonal examination (HE)

At amniocentesis, 20 ml amniotic fluid were obtained for possible hormonal assays. Hormonal assays consisted of the critical sample measurements of steroid hormone metabolites in amniotic fluid (17-hydroxyprogesterone, testosterone, androstenedione, 11-deoxycortisol, and 7-dehydrocholesterol/cholesterol) and in maternal serum (estriol); 17-hydroxyprogesterone, testosterone, and androstenedione were measured by RIA (CIS Biointernational, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany), and 7-dehydrocholesterol and cholesterol were measured by GC-MS at the Biochemistry and Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, University College London (London, UK). The maternal serum estriol level was measured by fluoroimmunoassay (AutoDELFIA Perkin/Elmer, Life Sciences, Wallac, Inc., Turku, Finland).

Results

During the 5-yr study period, 16 cases of ambiguous genitalia or genotype-phenotype discrepancy (Table 1Go) were evaluated from the pool of approximately 10,000 pregnancies. These cases do not represent the true incidence of sex disorders, as our center serves as a tertiary referral facility. Twelve patients were identified by routine US screening, and 4 patients were evaluated because of a discordance between the karyotype and the observed prenatal phenotype. In 5 of 16 cases, the initial sonographic examination was performed in the second trimester. In 3 of the remaining 11 cases, both initial and repeated scans were normal, and in one case initial US at 13 wk gestation revealed abnormality (enlarge rectum). In 7 of 11 cases, the initial scan at 13 wk gestation was normal, and only a repeated scan later in gestation revealed an abnormality. The clinical data of these cases are described in detail below.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Prenatal diagnosis of ambiguous genitalia: US and clinical data

 
Five fetuses (cases 1–5) were identified as having female pseudohermaphroditism (46,XX genotype, normal Mullerian duct structures, and masculinized external genitalia). Interestingly, in all five cases in which the first step of investigation (FUE) demonstrated a uterine structure, the next step (GE) yielded a 46,XX karyotype. In three cases (no. 1–3) the diagnosis was 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD; Table 1Go). The US examination at 22–24 wk revealed an enlarged clitoris with fused prominent labia (Fig. 3Go). In all three cases, a normal uterus with measurements within the normal reference range was demonstrated, suggesting female virilization. In case 1, in utero evaluation revealed an amniotic fluid 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) level of 51 ng/ml (normal range, 1.8–26.9), suggesting 21-OHD; in the other two cases the parents declined in utero investigation. Postnatally, 17-OHP levels were elevated in all three cases. In no case was there a family history of the disorder.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Female pseudohermaphroditism with normal uterus. A, Sonographic view of the external genitalia; note the enlarged clitoris (C) with fused prominent labia (L). B, The corresponding postnatal disposition verifying enlarged clitoris and fused labia.

 
In two cases (no. 4 and 5) the diagnosis was urorectal septum malformation sequence (Table 1Go). In case 4 the first screening US showed normal female genitalia with dilated rectum, a potential early sign of a cloacal anomaly. In case 5 the initial scan showed a phallus-like structure of the external genitalia (Fig. 4Go). In both cases the diagnosis was established only during midgestation by the demonstration of an enlarged pseudophallus structure and ambiguous external genitalia. The clinical details of both of these rare cases have been described previously (11).



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Female pseudohermaphroditism, urorectal septum malformation sequence. A, Ultrasonic view of the fetal external genitalia. B, Note the similarity to the postnatal view (P). P, Phallus-like structure; arrow, urine orifice. [Reproduced with permission from R. Achiron et al.: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:571–574, 2000 (11 ). ©International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.]

 
In four fetuses (cases 6–9) the diagnosis was male pseudohermaphroditism (46,XY genotype with incompletely masculinized external genitalia and no detectable Mullerian duct structures). In cases 6 and 7 the initial US scan at 13 wk gestation revealed an upward position of the external genitalia, suggesting a male phenotype, but routine subsequent scan showed severe micropenis. In both cases the pregnancy was terminated at wk 23; postnatal examination confirmed the prenatal findings (Fig. 5Go). The structure of the penis was normal, but the size was extremely small, consistent with the diagnosis of micropenis; the internal reproductive structures were not examined because parents declined investigation.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Male pseudohermaphroditism. A, An axial sonographic view through fetal external genitalia demonstrating normal size scrotum (S) with almost invisible penis. B, Postabortion disposition, confirming severe micropenis.

 
In case 8 the initial scan at 15 wk gestation showed a normal penis, but routine triple hormonal test performed at midgestation yielded an undetectable maternal serum estriol level (normal, >0.2 ng/ml), and subsequent routine US examination demonstrated micropenis. Further HE evaluation revealed that the ratio of 7-dehydrocholesterol to cholesterol was 9.19 x 10-4 (negative control, 8.69 x 10-4), excluding 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase deficiency (Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome) and suggesting steroid sulfatase deficiency. The diagnosis was confirmed postnatally by the presence of dark scaly skin and mild corneal opacities.

In case 9, in addition to micropenis, short bones with arrest of bone growth between 23 and 28 wk gestation strongly suggested the lethal disorder camptomelic dysplasia. The pregnancy was terminated without any further diagnostic testing.

In one case (no. 10) autosomal chromosome abnormalities were found. Initial US scan at 22 wk gestation revealed micropenis with other anomalies, including dextrocardia. On GE, trisomy 13 was demonstrated. The pregnancy was terminated.

In four cases (no. 11–14) sex chromosome abnormalities were identified. In two of them (no. 11 and 12) only the repeated US examination at midgestation demonstrated ambiguity. In case 11 transvaginal scan at 14 wk showed normal female external genitalia according to the sagittal sign. However, as gestation proceeded the clitoris enlarged, the major labia fused, and the uterus was not visualized. At 27 wk gestation amniotic fluid culture showed a 46,XX/XY genotype. In case 12 the US scan at 14 wk was interpreted as normal male. At 22 wk a repeated US scan revealed bifid scrotum and hypospadias. GE demonstrated 46,XX/45,XO, compatible with the diagnosis of gonadal dysgenesis; it also proved to be positive for SRY.

The other two cases (no. 13 and 14) were referred because of genotype-phenotype discordance. In case 13 US scan showed a normal male, but routine amniocentesis revealed 46,XX/45,XO. Therefore, FISH analysis was performed, and it was positive for SRY. In case 14, despite the normal appearance of male genitalia on US, amniocentesis revealed a 46,XY/48,XXYY karyotype.

In two cases (no. 15 and 16) there were normal male genitalia and a normal female karyotype, consistent with the diagnosis of sex reversal. In both, FISH examination confirmed the presence of SRY.

Of 10,000 US scans, about 60% were performed in the first trimester (6000 scans). In 8 cases, gender could not be determined in the first trimester (0.13%). In these cases an additional scan was performed in the second trimester. In 5 cases gender was determined clearly, whereas in 3 the diagnosis remained questionable. GE revealed 46,XY with positive SRY in all of these cases. Postnatally, 1 was found to have chordee, and 2 had normal male genitalia with penile length in the third percentile. When 2 sequential US scans were determined to be normal, there was no case of postnatal ambiguity (no false positive).

In our cohort, in 7 of 11 cases the first US scan performed at 13–15 wk of pregnancy was determined to be normal; however, a repeated scan at 22 wk was abnormal. Seven of 6000 is an estimated false negative rate of 0.12% in the first trimester.

Discussion

Thanks to increased sensitivity of current US technology combined with greater operator expertise, gender can be confidently established from the early stages of gestation on the basis of well defined anatomical images (12). In our study group 12 cases were evaluated because of ambiguous genitalia demonstrated on US, and 4 were evaluated because of a discordance between the karyotype and the observed prenatal phenotype. In 11 cases US scan was performed at 13–15 wk; in 7 of 11 the initial scan was normal, and only a repeated scan later in gestation revealed an abnormality. Therefore, a single screening US performed at 13–15 wk is not sufficiently sensitive or specific.

An abnormal scan after an earlier normal one may be explained by limited resolution related to the instrumentation, fetal size and position, or a progression in maldevelopment. Our understanding of the in utero evolution of an unexpected fetal phenotype is still fragmentary. To date, in utero developmental studies have been largely limited to spontaneous abortions and post facto evaluations of pathological cases. It is generally accepted that there is a critical period of 8–12 wk gestation for normal sexual development. However, insufficient attention has been directed to the possible secondary effects of aberrant processes. The secondary growth of the penis is poorly understood, but factors other than androgens are involved. For example, GH deficiency is well known to cause micropenis in an otherwise normally formed structure (13). Also, case 9, suspicious for a Sox9 defect, could represent a defect at the phase of penile growth unrelated to androgens. It is possible that micropenis may involve a degree of atrophy after the initial normal development of the phallus. Indeed, in our series all 4 cases of male pseudohermaphroditism had normal initial US scan, and only a repeated scan showed abnormality. Our findings of normal scan at 13–15 wk, followed subsequently by an abnormal one, suggest that anomalies in both size and structure of the reproductive organs may evolve after the critical differentiation period of 8–12 wk gestation. Indeed, abnormal growth of fetal organs represents a developmental biological process rather than a single nonprogressive pathological event (14).

In a newborn with ambiguous genitalia the direction of diagnostic testing is determined by the presence or absence of palpable gonads. By contrast, prenatally the testicular status is not a reliable measure of pathology, as up to 2% of normal males present with undescended testes at birth. However, FUE after approximately 19 wk provides an immediate image of the internal reproductive structures. In particular, detection of the uterus provides pivotal information.

If the uterus appears normal in a prenatal scan of ambiguous genitalia, the most likely diagnosis is a virilized karyotypic female. If GE reveals 46,XX with negative SRY, the diagnosis can be reasonably narrowed to virilized genetic female. Once a probable diagnosis of female pseudohermaphroditism is established, maternal virilization secondary to iatrogenic androgens, tumor, or fetal aromatase deficiency (15) should be excluded. In none of our cases could maternal virilization be identified.

In a genetic female with normal uterus and ambiguity, HE of amniotic fluid levels of 17-OHP, androstenedione, and testosterone to pinpoint the specific inborn error of steroidogenesis is optional. The most common cause of female pseudohermaphroditism is congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), and in most ethnic groups 95% of all cases of CAH are due to a deficiency of the p450 21-hydroxylase enzyme; 11ß-hydroxylase and 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiencies are rare (16). Although the prenatal detection of both 21-hydroxylase and 11ß-hydroxylase deficiencies has been reported (17, 18), the diagnosis of CAH can be established postpartum with anticipation of appropriate medical management. In our study there were three cases of ambiguous genitalia with normal uterus on US in which the diagnosis was female pseudohermaphroditism secondary to 21-OHD. All were index cases, so the diagnosis was established late in gestation, beyond the window of time during which therapy is effective in preventing sexual ambiguity. Only the family in case 1 opted for HE, but all three cases were managed satisfactorily after birth. The prenatal diagnosis alerted the medical team to avoid electrolyte deterioration after delivery and allowed for the provision of anticipatory guidance to the parents. With respect to the urorectal septum malformation sequence cases, the FUE step enabled early identification and early interaction between the multidisciplinary experts, particularly the urologist and pediatric surgeon, promoting better parental counseling.

The combination of 46,XY, genital ambiguity, and presence of a uterus on US may suggest aberrant SRY expression (19) or Mullerian inhibitory substance (MIS) and MIS receptor abnormalities (20). Although our series did not include such cases, these disorders should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Fetal genital ambiguity with the absence of a uterus on FUE suggests an undervirilized male. If the karyotype is 46,XY and there are other somatic abnormalities and/or autosomal chromosome abnormalities, the differential diagnosis depends on defining these associated defects. As demonstrated in case 9, US examination was able to detect, in addition to the genital ambiguity, severely shortened bones characteristic of SOX9/camptomelic dysplasia gene defects. This condition usually leads to death in the neonatal period due to respiratory distress. The presumptive prenatal diagnosis enabled informed genetic counseling with a disposition satisfactory to the family. This was also true in case 10 involving autosomal trisomy 13, a well known lethal genetic syndrome associated with ambiguous genitalia.

Similar to that during the newborn period, diagnosis of cases of undermasculinization with XY genotype is a particular challenge, further complicated prenatally by the narrow window of time available. In two cases of our series no definite diagnosis was established. Possible conditions with this presentation include Star (congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia) gene defects, 17ß-hydroxysteroid deficiency, and androgen resistance secondary to androgen receptor defects.

Our series revealed high frequency of sex chromosome aneuploidy and SRY gene translocations. There were 2 cases of 46,XX karyotype with positive SRY. The estimated reported incidence of 46,XX males is about 1 in 20,000 (21), which is lower than that in our study. It is possible that these cases are missed in the newborn period if there is no ambiguity. The widespread use of routine US examination and amniocentesis may establish a more accurate incidence in the near future. We had 2 cases of mosaic gonadal dysgenesis with 46,XX/45,XO and positive SRY, demonstrating the critical importance of SRY testing in establishing the diagnosis. Fetuses with these chromosomal characteristics may manifest a diverse genital phenotype (22). In our study 1 fetus had normal male genitalia, and the other had severely ambiguous genitalia. In 2 other cases we found mosaic 46,XX/XY and 48,XXYY/46,XX. In the fetuses that were carried to term, the early detection was very helpful for anticipatory guidance regarding future fertility and increased risk of gonadal tumors (23).

In conclusion, prenatal diagnostic work-up is feasible when abnormalities of the fetal genitalia are suspected or genotype-phenotype discrepancies are detected. US examinations performed at 13–14 wk are not good predictors of subsequent normality. Cases need to be examined longitudinally, as sex differentiation disorders may also evolve during the second trimester. After 19 wk the uterus has an important role in the prenatal evaluation. Early diagnosis allows for parental counseling and alerting the medical team.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mrs. Gloria Ganzack for her excellent editorial help.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: CAH, Congenital adrenal hyperplasia; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; FUE, fetal ultrasound examination; GE, genetic examination; HE, hormonal examination; 21-OHD, 21-hydroxylase deficiency; 17-OHP, 17-hydroxyprogesterone; SRY, sex-determining region on the Y gene; US, ultrasound.

Received June 28, 2002.

Accepted July 19, 2002.

References

  1. Smith DP, Felker RE, Noe HN, Emerson DS, Mercer B 1996 Prenatal diagnosis of genital anomalies. Urology 47:114–117[Medline]
  2. Bronshtein M, Riechler A, Zimmer EZ 1995 Prenatal sonographic signs of possible fetal genital anomalies. Prenat Diagn 15:215–219[Medline]
  3. Ginsberg NA, Cadkin A, Storm C, Bauer-Marsh E, Verlinsky Y 1999 Prenatal diagnosis of 46,XX male fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1006–1007[Medline]
  4. Baskin LS 1999 Society for Fetal Urology Panel Discussion: prenatal diagnosis and treatment of genital anomalies. Urology 53:1029–1031[Medline]
  5. Soriano D, Lipitz S, Sideman DS, Maimmon R, Mashiach S, Achiron R 1999 Development of the fetal uterus between 19 and 38 weeks of gestation in utero: ultrasonographic measurements. Hum Reprod 14:215–218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Zalel Y, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Lipitz S, Mashiach S, Achiron R 2001 The development of the fetal penis: an in-utero sonopraphic evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:129–131[Medline]
  7. Achiron R, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Zalel Y, Rotstein Z, Lipitz S 1998 Development of fetal male gender: prenatal sonographic measurement of the scrotum and evaluation of testicular descent. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:242–245[Medline]
  8. Emerson DS, Felker RE, Brown DL 1988 The sagittal sign: an early second trimester monographic Indicator of fetal gender. J Ultrasound Ed 8:293–297
  9. Birnholz JC 1983 Determination of fetal sex. N Engl J Med 309:942–944[Abstract]
  10. Aviram-Goldring A, Daniely M, Frydman M, Shneyour Y, Cohen H, Barkai G 2000 Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a family segregating a reciprocal translocation (5/15) (p15.3:q24). Am J Med Genet 90:120–122[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Achiron R, Frydman M, Lipitz S, Zalel Y 2000 Urorectal septum malformation sequence: prenatal sonographic diagnosis in two sets of discordant twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:571–574[Medline]
  12. Natsuyama E 1984 Sonographic determination of fetal sex from twelve weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet-Gynecol 149:748–757[Medline]
  13. Levy JB, Husmann DA 1996 Micropenis secondary to growth hormone deficiency: does treatment with growth hormone alone result in adequate penile growth? J Urol 156:214–216[Medline]
  14. Yagel S, Achiron R 1998 Developmental fetal malformations: time to change terminology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:89–91[Medline]
  15. Shozu M, Akasofu K, Harada T, Kubota Y 1991 A new cause of female pseudohermaphroditism: placental aromatase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:560–566[Abstract]
  16. New MI 1995 Steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency (congenital adrenal hyperplasia). Am J Med 16:2S–8S
  17. Rosler A, Weshler N, Leiberman E, Hocberg Z, Weidenfeld J, Chemke J 1988 11ß-Hydroxylase deficiency congenital adrenal hyperplasia: update of prenatal diagnosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66:830–838[Abstract]
  18. Cerame BI, Newfield RS, Pascoe L, Curnow KM, Nimkarn S, Roe TF, New MI, Wilson RC 1999 Prenatal diagnosis and treatment of 11ß-hydroxylase deficiency congenital adrenal hyperplasia resulting in normal genitalia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3129–3134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cameron F, Sinclair AH 1997 Mutations in SRY and SOX9: testis-determining genes. Hum Mutat 9:388–395[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Belville C, Josso N, Picard JY 1999 Persistence of Mullerian derivatives in males. Am J Med Genet 89:218–223[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Reddy PP, Papenhausen PR, Suh YM, Riddick LM, Calvano CJ, Mandell J 1997 XX sex reversal: molecular analysis of the SRY/ZFY regions. J Urol 158:1305–1307[Medline]
  22. Lespinasse J, Gicquel C, Robert M, Le Bouc Y 1998 Phenotypic and genotypic variability in monozygotic triplets with Turner syndrome. Clin Genet 54:56–59[Medline]
  23. Gibbons B, Tan SY, Yu CC, Cheah E, Tan HL 1993 Risk of gonadoblastoma in female patients with Y chromosome abnormalities and dysgenetic gonads. J Paediatr Child Health 35:210–213[CrossRef]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
P. Glanc, S. Umranikar, D. Koff, G. Tomlinson, and D. Chitayat
Fetal Sex Assignment by Sonographic Evaluation of the Pelvic Organs in the Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy
J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2007; 26(5): 563 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Malan, R. Gesny, N. Morichon-Delvallez, M.C. Aubry, A. Benachi, D. Sanlaville, C. Turleau, J.P. Bonnefont, C. Fekete-Nihoul, and M. Vekemans
Prenatal diagnosis and normal outcome of a 46,XX/46,XY chimera: A Case Report
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1037 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinhas-Hamiel, O.
Right arrow Articles by Achiron, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinhas-Hamiel, O.
Right arrow Articles by Achiron, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals