help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Firth, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Firth, S. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 87, No. 1 271-276
Copyright © 2002 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

Molecular Distribution of IGF Binding Protein-5 in Human Serum

Robert C. Baxter, Sridevi Meka and Sue M. Firth

Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert C. Baxter, Ph.D., D.Sc., Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia. E-mail: robaxter{at}med.usyd.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IGF binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5) forms ternary complexes with IGFs and the acid-labile subunit (ALS) in vitro, but these complexes have not been demonstrated in the circulation. To examine the molecular distribution of circulating IGFBP-5 we developed an RIA with high specificity for IGFBP-5 among the IGFBPs, but wide cross-reactivity among primate and nonprimate species. The mean serum IGFBP-5 level (±SD) was 208 ± 73 ng/ml in healthy men and 206 ± 67 ng/ml in nonpregnant women, decreasing to 114 ± 38 ng/ml in pregnancy. Approximately 55% of immunoreactive IGFBP-5 was associated with ternary complexes in nonpregnant adults, whereas only 35% was in these complexes in pregnancy serum. After transient acidification, all immunoreactive IGFBP-5 corresponded in size to free or binary-complexed protein. Serum IGFBP-5 levels were significantly associated with ALS levels (r = 0.478; P = 0.008), but the association was less than that between IGFBP-3 and ALS (r = 0.743; P < 0.001), reflecting the lower percentage of IGFBP-5 complexed with ALS. As free or binary complexed IGFBP-5 is a relatively high proportion of the total, we speculate that, alone or as a carrier of IGFs, IGFBP-5 might have preferential access to the tissues, where it could act to stimulate growth.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IGF BINDING PROTEIN-5 (IGFBP-5) is one of a family of six IGFBPs, multifunctional proteins that transport IGFs in the circulation, control their availability to the tissues, and regulate their access to cell surface receptors (1). By virtue of dual binding domains in their amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions, the IGFBPs can form high affinity binary complexes with IGF-I and IGF-II (2). Interactions between IGFs and IGFBPs are assumed to be the major way in which IGFBPs exert their regulatory functions, although there is also substantial evidence that IGFBPs can affect cell function by mechanisms that do not involve IGF binding (2, 3).

Until recently, one IGFBP, IGFBP-3, was believed to be distinct from the others in its ability to form ternary complexes in the circulation by binding IGF-I or IGF-II and then interacting with a third protein, the acid-labile subunit (ALS) (4). ALS is a liver-derived serum glycoprotein of the leucine-rich repeat family (5). However, we have recently shown that, like IGFBP-3, IGFBP-5 is also able to form ternary complexes with IGFs and ALS, with an apparent binding affinity for ALS comparable to that of the IGFBP-3-ALS interaction (6). Both IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 have a highly basic motif in their carboxyl-terminal domain, which appears to be the major site of interaction with ALS (7, 8). The same basic residues are involved with IGFBP-3 and -5 interaction with glycosaminoglycans and the cell surface (7, 9) and transport to the cell nucleus (10). In addition, IGFBP-5 may have a secondary site of interaction with ALS (11) and glycosaminoglycans (12) in its central domain.

An RIA for IGFBP-5 has been reported (13). Using this assay, serum IGFBP-5 was detected in two molecular forms, 30–40 kDa (i.e. free or complexed with IGF-I or IGF-II) and 18 kDa (i.e. partially proteolyzed). The absence of IGFBP-5 in ternary complexes with ALS was surprising, given that it can bind ALS similarly to IGFBP-3 and coelutes with ALS when serum is fractionated by gel chromatography (6). To investigate this discrepancy we have now developed a new RIA for IGFBP-5 and have used it to examine the size distribution of IGFBP-5 in serum from healthy nonpregnant and pregnant subjects. We report that ternary-complexed IGFBP-5 exists in serum from healthy male and female subjects and, to a lesser extent, in pregnancy serum.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression and purification of recombinant human IGFBP-5

An 868-bp cDNA encoding human IGFBP-5 was isolated by RT-PCR from U2-OS osteosarcoma cells and subcloned into the adenoviral- mediated expression system, AdEasy (14). Medium (2.5 liters) conditioned by human embryonic retinoblast 911 cells (15) infected with the IGFBP-5 recombinant type 5 adenovirus (16) was applied to a column of IGF-I-Affigel-10, washed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate (pH 6.5), and eluted with 0.5 M acetic acid (pH 3.0) essentially as described for recombinant human IGFBP-3 (17). Eluted fractions were further purified by reverse phase HPLC on a 5-µm, 300 Å C18 column (Symmetry 300, Waters Corp., Milford, MA) using a linear gradient of 15–24% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 10 min, followed by 24–33% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 20 min. Peak fractions were pooled and confirmed as human IGFBP-5 by sequencing of the first 10 amino-terminal residues, and the concentration was estimated by quantitative amino acid analysis performed on duplicate samples. The amino-terminal sequencing and quantitative amino acid analysis were performed by the Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (Sydney, Australia).

Preparation of antiserum

An IGFBP-5 antiserum was raised by the Veterinary Services Division at the Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science (Adelaide, Australia). A White Leghorn hen, aged 16–20 wk, was injected sc at multiple sites in the breast with 100 µg recombinant human IGFBP-5 in complete Freund’s adjuvant. Three boosts of 100 µg IGFBP-5 in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant were given at 3-wk intervals, and a final boost was given 5 wk later. Between wk 7–14 of the immunization schedule, 22 eggs were collected. A crude extract of IgY, as a component of water-soluble proteins, was extracted from the hyperimmune egg yolks by a proprietary procedure of Antiven Pty. Ltd. (Adelaide, South Australia). The IgY extract was stored as aliquots at -80 C.

IGFBP-5 RIA

Approximately 2–4 x 108 cpm 125I-labeled IGF-I (160–200 µCi/µg) (18) were incubated with 10 µg IGFBP-5 in 50 mM sodium phosphate, 1 g/liter BSA, and 0.2 g/liter sodium azide, pH 7.0, at 22 C for 2 h. The sample was then covalently cross-linked with 0.25 mM (final concentration) disuccinimidyl suberate (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) at 22 C for 30 min, and the reaction was terminated by the addition of 50 mM (final concentration) Tris-HCl, pH 7.8. The tracer was separated from unincorporated 125I-labeled IGF-I by chromatography on a Sephadex G-100 column in 0.5 M acetic acid (pH 3) containing 0.1 M NaCl and 2.5 g/liter BSA. The tracer was stored as aliquots of 2 x 106 cpm at -80 C.

Samples or standards (50 µl), IGFBP-5 antibody (100 µl of a 1:100 dilution), 125I-labeled IGF-I cross-linked to IGFBP-5 tracer (100 µl; ~10,000 cpm), and IGF-I (10 ng) were set up in duplicate in a total volume of 500 µl 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 2.5 g/liter BSA, 0.1 ml/liter Triton X-100, and 0.2 g/liter sodium azide. The standard curve covered the range of 0.25–50 ng IGFBP-5. Serum samples were measured at 5 and 10 µl, diluted to 50 µl in assay buffer. After 18–20 h of incubation at 4 C, 2 µl sheep anti-IgY antiserum and 0.5 µl normal chicken serum were added together in 25 µl buffer to each tube. The tubes were further incubated for 1 h at 4 C before adding 1 ml cold polyethylene glycol (60 g/liter in 0.15 M NaCl). After 20–30 min at 4 C, the bound radioactivity was precipitated by centrifugation. Supernatants were decanted, and the radioactivity in the pellets was determined by a {gamma}-counter.

Other assays

Human IGFBP-3 and ALS were measured by specific RIA methods as previously described (19, 20), except that the IGFBP-3 assays used the high titer rabbit antiserum R-100 at a 1:100,000 final dilution.

SDS-PAGE analysis, blotting, and affinity labeling

Proteins for analysis were reconstituted in 20 µl Laemmli sample buffer, heated at 95 C for 5 min, fractionated under nonreducing conditions on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose. For immunoblot analyses, the nitrocellulose was incubated with 50 g/liter skim milk powder in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) at 37 C for 2 h, followed by incubation with the IGFBP-5 antibody (1:100 dilution) in 50 g/liter skim milk powder in TBS at 4 C for 16 h. The blot was then washed twice for 10 min each time with TBS containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40 and four times with TBS. After incubation with rabbit antichicken IgY-horseradish peroxidate conjugate (1:1000 dilution) in 50 g/liter skim milk powder in TBS at 22 C for 2 h, the blot was washed as described above, then developed in 25 ml TBS containing 150 µl 30% hydrogen peroxide mixed with 5 ml 17 mM 4-chloro-1-naphtol (made up in methanol) for 20 min. The blot was then washed in water.

For ligand blot, the nitrocellulose was incubated with 10 g/liter BSA in TBS at 37 C for 2 h. This was followed by an incubation with 1 x 106 cpm of either [125I]IGF-I or [125I]IGF-II in TBS containing 10 g/liter BSA and 0.05% Nonidet P-40 at 4 C for 16 h. The blot was washed twice with TBS containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40 and four times with TBS (10 min/wash) and then exposed to film. For the affinity labeling experiment, approximately 2 x 105 cpm 125I-labeled IGF-I cross-linked to IGFBP-5 (described above) were incubated with 1 µg ALS, in a total volume of 300 µl 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH6.5) containing 2.5 g/liter BSA, at 22 C for 2.5 h. Complexes were cross-linked with 0.25 mM disuccinimidyl suberate (final concentration) at 22 C for 30 min. The reaction was then terminated by the addition of 15 µl 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.8). Part (2 x 104 cpm) of each reaction was reconstituted in Laemmli sample buffer, heated to 95 C for 5 min, and separated under nonreducing conditions on a 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The gel was stained with Coomassie blue, dried, and then exposed to film.

Fractionation of serum samples

Sera from healthy men, nonpregnant women, and women in the first trimester of pregnancy were obtained from staff and patients at Royal North Shore Hospital with the approval of the institutional human ethics committee. Sera were fractionated by running 200-µl aliquots on a Superose-12 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) at 0.5 ml/min at 22 C in 50 mM sodium phosphate and 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5. To inactivate ALS, some samples were adjusted to pH 2.5–3.0 with dilute HCl, incubated for 1 h at 22 C, then reneutralized with dilute NaOH before fractionation. Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected, and fractions 20–33 were assayed in duplicate for IGFBP-5 (200 µl) and IGFBP-3 (25 µl of a 1:4 dilution).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The chicken antihuman IGFBP-5 antibody was evaluated for its ability to detect recombinant human IGFBP-5 by immunoblot. Figure 1aGo shows samples of 25, 50, and 100 ng IGFBP-5 expressed in the human embryonic retinoblast 911 cell line, which appear as a characteristic doublet of approximately 30 kDa. By ligand blot, the recombinant IGFBP-5 reacted more strongly with radiolabeled IGF-II than IGF-I (Fig. 1BGo). The cross-linked IGF-I-IGFBP-5 tracer used in the RIA is shown in Fig. 1CGo. Affinity labeling pure human ALS with this tracer yielded a characteristic doublet ternary complex of approximately 120–130 kDa, as seen previously with a yeast-derived human IGFBP-5 preparation (6). The smaller band is assumed to represent the complex containing partially degraded IGFBP-5.



View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Immunoblot analysis of recombinant human IGFBP-5 expressed in human 911 cells (lanes 1–3: 25, 50, and 100 ng), detected with chicken antihuman IGFBP-5 antibody after SDS-PAGE. B, Ligand blot showing approximately 100 ng recombinant IGFBP-5 detected by blotting with [125I]IGF-1 (lane 1) and [125I]IGF-II (lane 2). C, Affinity labeling of human ALS with covalent IGF-I-IGFBP-5 tracer. Samples are [125I]IGF-I-IGFBP-5 tracer incubated alone followed by cross-linking (lane 1), [125I]IGF-I-IGFBP-5 tracer incubated with 1 µg ALS followed by cross-linking (lane 2), and [125I]IGF-I-IGFBP-5 tracer without cross-linking (lane 3). Arrows indicate the 120-/130-kDa IGFBP-5 ternary complex doublet.

 
An RIA was established using yolk-derived antihuman IGFBP-5 antibody and cross-linked IGF-I-IGFBP-5 tracer. This tracer was used in the RIA, similar to the use of cross-linked tracer in the IGFBP-3 RIA (19), because it gave lower nonspecific binding than iodinated IGFBP-5 (data not shown). The tracer was displaced with an ED50 of 1.01 ± 0.13 ng/tube (±SD; n = 15). Three quality control samples showed between-assay coefficients of variance, determined from 15 assays run in duplicate, of 14.2% at 1.1 ng/tube, 11.3% at 2.0 ng/tube, and 12.9% at 4.2 ng/tube. The within-assay coefficients of variance, determined by ANOVA of 15 duplicate pairs for each control sample, were 3.0%, 5.1%, and 5.1%, respectively, at the same three dose levels. Figure 2AGo shows the cross-reactivity of the IGFBP-5 RIA for other human IGFBPs. Only IGFBP-6 showed any reactivity, estimated to be approximately 0.3%. Sera from a variety of primate and nonprimate species showed cross-reactivity, illustrated in Fig. 2BGo for the primates lemur, chimpanzee, and human, and the nonprimates horse, rat, goat, and cat.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Cross-reactivity of human IGFBP-1 to IGFBP-6 in the IGFBP-5 RIA. IGFBP-6 cross-reactivity is approximately 0.3%. B, Cross-reactivity of sera from various primate and nonprimate species, as indicated, in the IGFBP-5 RIA. All species tested react in this assay.

 
The mean serum IGFBP-5 level (±SD) was 208 ± 73 ng/ml for 41 healthy males, aged 16–53 yr, and 206 ± 67 ng/ml for 37 healthy nonpregnant females, aged 16–49 yr, both significantly different (P < 0.001) from the mean of 114 ± 38 ng/ml for 11 pregnant women, aged 26–38 yr (Fig. 3AGo). The mean for 15 males, aged 16–18 yr (180 ± 33 ng/ml), was slightly lower than that for 26 males, aged 23–53 yr (224 ± 85 ng/ml), whereas for nonpregnant females there was no difference between mean values for 16 subjects, aged 16–18 yr, and 21 subjects, aged 22–49 yr (P = 0.853). Figure 3BGo shows the relationship between age and serum IGFBP-5 for all 89 subjects.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Mean serum IGFBP-5 levels (±SD) in 41 healthy men, aged 16–53 yr; 37 healthy nonpregnant (NP) women, aged 16–49 yr; and 11 pregnant (P) women, aged 26–38 yr. B, Relationship between serum IGFBP-5 and age for all 89 subjects.

 
To determine the size distribution of IGFBP-5 in normal serum, five female and five male sera were fractionated by Superose-12 size-exclusion chromatography. As shown in Fig. 4Go, in both men and women approximately 55% of immunoreactive IGFBP-5 was found in fractions corresponding to approximately 130 kDa, with 45% corresponding to free or binary-complexed IGFBP-5. In contrast, as previously described (21), almost 90% of immunoreactive IGFBP-3 was in high molecular mass forms of approximately 150 kDa, peaking one fraction earlier than IGFBP-5. We have previously shown that the size distribution of IGFBP-3 in pregnancy serum is identical to that in nonpregnancy despite the fact that pregnancy IGFBP-3 appears heavily proteolyzed when analyzed electrophoretically (22). IGFBP-5, however, showed a markedly altered serum profile in pregnancy, with a shift in the size distribution toward that expected for free and binary-complexed forms. As shown for five fractionated pregnancy sera, a mean of only approximately 35% of immunoreactive IGFBP-5 was found in high molecular mass peaks (Fig. 5AGo). When sera were transiently acidified and reneutralized before size fractionation, essentially all of the IGFBP-5 appeared at a size corresponding to free or binary-complexed protein, eluting slightly later than IGFBP-3 in the same acidified sera (Fig. 5BGo).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Size distribution of immunoreactive IGFBP-3 (A and B) and IGFBP-5 (C and D) in sera from men and nonpregnant women. Values are the mean ± SEM for five subjects in each group. Each serum sample was fractionated on a column of Superose-12, as described in Materials and Methods, and the concentration of immunoreactive IGFBP-3 or IGFBP-5 was determined in each 0.5-ml fraction.

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. A, Size distribution of immunoreactive IGFBP-5 in sera from five pregnant women. Values are the mean ± SEM. Each serum sample was fractionated on a column of Superose-12, as described in Materials and Methods, and the concentration of immunoreactive IGFBP-5 was determined in each 0.5-ml fraction. B, Size distribution of immunoreactive IGFBP-3 ({circ}) and IGFBP-5 (•) in representative serum sample after transient acidification to approximately pH 3 and reneutralization. Serum was fractionated on a column of Superose-12, and the concentration of immunoreactive IGFBP-3 or IGFBP-5 was determined in each 0.5-ml fraction.

 
In 30 healthy nonpregnant subjects, serum levels of both IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 were highly correlated with ALS levels, although the correlation was stronger for IGFBP-3, which has a higher proportion in ternary complexes than IGFBP-5 (Fig. 6Go). There was no significant association between IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 levels.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Relationship between serum concentrations of IGFBP-5 and ALS (A), IGFBP-3 and ALS (B), and IGFBP-5 and IGFBP-3 (C) in 30 healthy adults.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Ternary complexes containing IGF-I or IGF-II, IGFBP-3, and ALS, account for the majority of the total IGF concentration in the adult human circulation. The role of this circulating IGF pool is controversial; whereas in growing humans and animals, a reduction in circulating IGF-I is almost invariably associated with growth retardation, mice in which hepatic IGF-I production is ablated have near-normal growth rates despite greatly reduced serum total IGF-I levels (23). Serum free IGF-I is, however, normal (24). These contrasting observations point to the complex relationship between the circulating forms of IGFs and the availability of IGFs to the tissues. This relationship appears to depend in part on a dynamic equilibrium between IGFs and their potential binding sites on all six IGFBPs and on the equilibrium between the various binary IGF-IGFBP complexes and ternary complexes with ALS. Measured under near-physiological conditions, ALS binds IGFBP-3 with very low affinity, compared with the IGF-IGFBP-3 interaction (25), but IGFBP-3 nevertheless predominates in ternary complexes; the equilibrium is apparently driven by an excess ALS concentration (20).

IGFBP-5 is also capable of forming ternary complexes with IGFs and ALS (6). As in the case of IGFBP-3, basic residues in the carboxyl-terminal domain of IGFBP-5 appear responsible for the interaction with ALS (8, 16). Given that IGFBP-5-containing ternary complexes appear to form with a similar affinity as complexes containing IGFBP-3 (6), it might be expected that, like IGFBP-3, the majority of IGFBP-5 would circulate complexed to ALS. However, the only study to date that has used a quantitative immunoassay for IGFBP-5 to examine this question concluded that the majority of IGFBP-5 in human serum was between 25–43 kDa (i.e. free or complexed to IGFs), with a small proportion in forms of lower molecular mass, presumably due to proteolysis (13). In an attempt to reconcile this observation with our in vitro data on ALS binding by IGFBP-5, we therefore developed reagents to examine the size distribution of circulating immunoreactive IGFBP-5 by expressing recombinant human IGFBP-5 in a human cell line and establishing a specific immunoassay.

After several failed attempts to raise human IGFBP-5 antisera in rabbits, an antibody was raised in chickens and harvested from egg yolks. Unlike all of the human IGFBP antisera previously raised in this laboratory, and the majority reported in the literature, this IgY antibody showed a broad specificity among both primate and nonprimate species, making it a valuable resource for studies in both humans and experimental animals. Undetectable cross-reactivity in the RIA with all other IGFBPs apart from IGFBP-6 (<1% cross-reactivity) allows the assay to be used with confidence under all experimental conditions.

We found no difference in serum IGFBP-5 levels between healthy men and women, and no age effect between 16 and 50 yr, but the mean levels of approximately 200 ng/ml are only half the levels previously reported by Mohan et al. (13). A variety of differences between the two assays might contribute to this discrepancy: the source or calibration of standard IGFBP-5, the different IGFBP-5 tracers [iodo-IGF-I cross-linked to IGFBP-5 in this study vs. iodo-IGFBP-5 in the study by Mohan et al. (13)], or the different source of antibodies (egg-yolk vs. guinea pig serum), which might distinguish minor differences, such as glycosylation or phosphorylation, between the form of IGFBP-5 used as an immunogen and standard, and the form in the circulation. More striking is the difference in IGFBP-5 size distribution found in our study compared with the previous report, with about 55% of total immunoreactive IGFBP-5 corresponding to ternary complexes in both men and nonpregnant women. This contrasts with about 90% of IGFBP-3 in ternary complexes. The high molecular mass IGFBP-5 complexes were, like those containing IGFBP-3, acid-labile, with all immunoreactive IGFBP-5 detectable at a size corresponding to free or binary complexed protein, when analyzed after acidification and reneutralization.

Heterotrimers containing IGF-IGFBP-ALS are remarkably stable in the circulation, and IGF-I bound in this form has been reported to have a circulating half-life of 12–15 h (26), whereas IGFs bound in binary complexes exit the circulation within minutes (26, 27). The availability of IGFs to the tissues will therefore be influenced by the degree to which they are distributed between ALS-containing complexes and binary complexes. This is also true for the IGFBPs, which are greatly stabilized in the circulation complexed to ALS (27). Thus, mice with a deleted ALS gene have barely detectable serum IGFBP-3 levels despite normal IGFBP-3 mRNA levels due to their inability to stabilize the protein in high molecular mass complexes (28). Similarly, GH administration to humans over 5 d increases serum IGFBP-3 levels without any change in hepatic IGFBP-3 mRNA, presumably the result of increased IGF-I and ALS stabilizing IGFBP-3 in the circulation (29).

Accordingly, we confirmed a high correlation between serum IGFBP-3 and ALS levels and found a lower, although still highly significant, correlation between IGFBP-5 and ALS, reflecting the lower percentage of IGFBP-5 stabilized in ALS complexes. A significant association between serum IGFBP-5 and ALS has been reported previously in children with chronic renal failure (30) and was taken as evidence that IGFBP-5 and ALS interact in the circulation, although this was not demonstrated. It is unclear why the extent of complexing with ALS, and hence the correlation with serum ALS levels, is weaker for circulating IGFBP-5 than for IGFBP-3. The recombinant proteins bind ALS similarly when tested in vitro (16), but it is possible that the proteins in the circulation are posttranslationally modified in ways that are undetectable by the methods used in this study, such that their ALS-binding activity in vivo is altered.

IGFBP-3 circulates in adult humans at about 3000 ng/ml (70 nM), of which about 10% (7 nM) is free or in binary complexes. We have now shown that IGFBP-5 circulates at about 200 ng/ml (7 nM), of which about 45% (3 nM) is free or in binary complexes. Therefore, despite the 10-fold lower molar concentration of total IGFBP-5 compared with IGFBP-3, the fraction that is available to transport IGFs to the tissues has a concentration almost half that of the equivalent fraction of IGFBP-3. IGFBP-5 must therefore be considered to potentially play an important role in regulating the tissue availability of IGFs.

Pregnancy was associated with a 50% reduction in total serum IGFBP-5 levels and a substantial shift in size distribution from about 55% in ternary complexes to about 35% in this form. In contrast, total serum immunoreactive IGFBP-3 showed a slight increase, and the size distribution was unchanged, in pregnancy (22). Pregnancy serum is known to contain increased concentrations of proteases that act on IGFBPs (31), and IGFBP-3 in pregnancy appears fully proteolyzed when analyzed by immunoblotting after SDS-PAGE (32). A pregnancy-dependent protease with activity against IGFBP-5 has also been identified (31).

As IGFBP-5 ternary complexes are decreased in pregnancy, it may be speculated that proteolyzed IGFBP-5 associates with ALS less readily than the intact protein, even though this has been shown not to be the case for IGFBP-3 (33). If the carboxyl-terminal domain of IGFBP-5 is lost as a result of partial proteolysis, a weak interaction with ALS might remain, as a central domain binding site for ALS has been demonstrated (11). However, the relatively low affinity for ALS might cause a greater proportion of IGFBP-5 to remain in binary, rather than ternary, complexes. In this way, even though total IGFBP-5 is reduced in pregnancy, the increased proportion in binary complexes might ensure that IGF bioavailability from IGFBP-5 complexes is not decreased.

In conclusion, we have established a specific immunoassay for IGFBP-5 and have shown that a majority of serum IGFBP-5 in healthy adults occurs in ternary complexes with ALS. Pregnancy decreases total IGFBP-5, but increases the proportion that is free or in binary complexes. IGFBP-5 has recently been shown to have growth-promoting activity in vivo (34), so that, whether alone or as a carrier of IGFs, IGFBP-5 that is not complexed with ALS might have preferential access to the tissues, where it could act to stimulate growth. It will be of great interest to determine whether IGFBP-5 and IGFs circulating in IGFBP-5 complexes reach a multitude of tissue sites or are selectively targeted to particular tissues.


    Acknowledgments
 


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by Project Grant 990005 (to R.C.B. and S.M.F.) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Abbreviations: ALS, Acid-labile subunit; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; TBS, Tris-buffered saline.

Received July 12, 2001.

Accepted October 1, 2001.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rajaram S, Baylink DJ, Mohan S 1997 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in serum and other biological fluids: regulation and functions. Endocr Rev 18:801–831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Baxter RC 2000 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding proteins: interactions with IGFs and intrinsic bioactivities. Am J Physiol 278:E967–E976
  3. Grimberg A, Cohen P 2000 Role of insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in growth control and carcinogenesis. J Cell Physiol 183:1–9[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Baxter RC, Martin JL 1989 Structure of the Mr 140,000 growth hormone-dependent insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex: determination by reconstitution and affinity labeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6898–6902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Leong SR, Baxter RC, Camerato T, Dai J, Wood WI 1992 Structure and functional expression of the acid-labile subunit of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex. Mol Endocrinol 6:870–876[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Twigg SM, Baxter RC 1998 Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein 5 forms an alternative ternary complex with IGFs and the acid-labile subunit. J Biol Chem 273:6074–6079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Firth SM, Ganeshprasad U, Baxter RC 1998 Structural determinants of ligand and cell-surface binding of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3. J Biol Chem 273:2631–2638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Twigg SM, Kiefer MC, Zapf J, Baxter RC 1998 Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5 complexes with the acid-labile subunit: role of the carboxyl-terminal domain. J Biol Chem 273:28791–28798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Booth BA, Boes M, Andress DL, Dake BL, Kiefer MC, Maack C, Linhardt RJ, Bar K, Caldwell EEO, Weiler J, Bar RS 1995 IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 association with endothelial cells: role of C-terminal heparin binding domain. Growth Regul 5:1–17[Medline]
  10. Schedlich LS, Le Page SL, Firth SM, Briggs LJ, Jans DA, Baxter RC 2000 Nuclear import of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and IGFBP-5 is mediated by the importin ß subunit. J Biol Chem 275:23462–23470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Twigg SM, Kiefer MC, Zapf J, Baxter RC 2000 A central domain binding site in insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5 for the acid-labile subunit. Endocrinology 141:454–457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Song H, Shand JH, Beattie J, Flint DJ, Allan GJ 2001 The carboxy-terminal domain of IGF-binding protein-5 inhibits heparin binding to a site in the central domain. J Mol Endocrinol 26:229–239[Abstract]
  13. Mohan S, Libanati C, Dony C, Lang K, Srinivasan N, Baylink DJ 1995 Development, validation, and application of a radioimmunoassay for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 in human serum and other biological fluids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2638–2645[Abstract]
  14. He TC, Zhou S, da Costa LT, Yu J, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B 1998 A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2509–2514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Fallaux FJ, Kranenburg O, Cramer SJ, Houweling A, Van Ormondt H, Hoeben RC, Van Der Eb AJ 1996 Characterization of 911: a new helper cell line for the titration and propagation of early region 1-deleted adenoviral vectors. Hum Gene Ther 7:215–222[Medline]
  16. Firth SM, Clemmons DR, Baxter RC 2001 Mutagenesis of basic amino acids in the carboxyl-terminal region of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 affects acid-labile subunit binding. Endocrinology 142:2147–2150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Firth SM, Ganeshprasad U, Poronnik P, Cook DI, Baxter RC 1999 Adenoviral-mediated expression of human insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3. Protein Expr Purif 16:202–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Baxter RC, Brown AS, Turtle JR 1982 Radioimmunoassay for somatomedin C: comparison with radioreceptor assay in patients with growth-hormone disorders, hypothyroidism, and renal failure. Clin Chem 28:488–495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Baxter RC, Martin JL 1986 Radioimmunoassay of growth hormone-dependent insulin-like growth factor binding protein in human plasma. J Clin Invest 78:1504–1512
  20. Baxter RC 1990 Circulating levels and molecular distribution of the acid-labile ({alpha}) subunit of the high molecular weight insulin-like growth factor-binding protein complex in normal subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1347–1353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Baxter RC 1988 Characterization of the acid-labile subunit of the growth hormone-dependent insulin-like growth factor binding protein complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:265–272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Suikkari A-M, Baxter RC 1992 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 is functionally normal in pregnancy serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 74:177–183[Abstract]
  23. Butler AA, LeRoith D 2001 Minireview: tissue-specific versus generalized gene targeting of the igf1 and igf1r genes and their roles in insulin-like growth factor physiology. Endocrinology 142:1685–1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Yakar S, Liu JL, Fernandez AM, Wu Y, Schally AV, Frystyk J, Chernausek SD, Mejia W, Le Roith D 2001 Liver-specific igf-1 gene deletion leads to muscle insulin insensitivity. Diabetes 50:1110–1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Holman SR, Baxter RC 1996 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3: factors affecting binary and ternary complex formation. Growth Regul 6:42–47[Medline]
  26. Guler H-P, Zapf J, Schmid C, Froesch ER 1989 Insulin-like growth factors I and II in healthy man. Estimations of half-lives and production rates. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 121:753–758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Lewitt MS, Saunders H, Baxter RC 1993 Bioavailability of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) in rats determined by the molecular distribution of human IGF-binding protein-3. Endocrinology 133:1797–1802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ueki I, Ooi GT, Tremblay ML, Hurst KR, Bach LA, Boisclair YR 2000 Inactivation of the acid labile subunit gene in mice results in mild retardation of postnatal growth despite profound disruptions in the circulating insulin-like growth factor system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6868–6873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Olivecrona HI, Hilding A, Ekström C, Barle H, Nyberg B, Möller C, Delhanty P, Baxter RC, Angelin B, Ekström T, Tally M 1999 Acute and short-term effects of growth hormone on insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: serum levels and hepatic mRNA responses in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:553–560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Powell DR, Durham SK, Brewer ED, Frane JW, Watkins SL, Hogg RJ, Mohan S 1999 Effects of chronic renal failure and growth hormone on serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) and IGFBP-5 in children: a report of the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:596–601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kubler B, Cowell S, Zapf J, Braulke T 1998 Proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins by a novel 50-kilodalton metalloproteinase in human pregnancy serum. Endocrinology 139:1556–1563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hossenlopp P, Segovia B, Lassarre C, Roghani M, Bredon M, Binoux M 1990 Evidence of enzymatic degradation of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins in the 150K complex during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71: 797–805
  33. Baxter RC, Suikkari AM, Martin JL 1993 Characterization of the binding defect in insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 from pregnancy serum. Biochem J 294:847–852
  34. Miyakoshi N, Richman C, Kasukawa Y, Linkhart TA, Baylink DJ, Mohan S 2001 Evidence that IGF-binding protein-5 functions as a growth factor. J Clin Invest 107:73–81[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Yan, L. D. Payet, R. C. Baxter, and S. M. Firth
Activity of Human Pregnancy Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3: Determination by Reconstituting Recombinant Complexes
Endocrinology, November 1, 2009; 150(11): 4968 - 4976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
G. Tripathi, D. A. M. Salih, A. C. Drozd, R. A. Cosgrove, L. J. Cobb, and J. M. Pell
IGF-independent effects of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 (Igfbp5) in vivo
FASEB J, August 1, 2009; 23(8): 2616 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
M. E. Graham, D. M. Kilby, S. M. Firth, P. J. Robinson, and R. C. Baxter
The in Vivo Phosphorylation and Glycosylation of Human Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-5
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2007; 6(8): 1392 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
H. Yasuoka, Z. Zhou, J. M. Pilewski, T. D. Oury, A. M.K. Choi, and C. A. Feghali-Bostwick
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-5 Induces Pulmonary Fibrosis and Triggers Mononuclear Cellular Infiltration
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2006; 169(5): 1633 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
C.A. White, E. Dimitriadis, A.M. Sharkey, and L.A. Salamonsen
Interleukin-11 inhibits expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 mRNA in decidualizing human endometrial stromal cells
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 11(9): 649 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Butt, K. A. Dickson, S. Jambazov, and R. C. Baxter
Enhancement of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}-Induced Growth Inhibition by Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-5 (IGFBP-5), But Not IGFBP-3 in Human Breast Cancer Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2005; 146(7): 3113 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Oesterreicher, W. F. Blum, B. Schmidt, T. Braulke, and B. Kubler
Interaction of Insulin-like Growth Factor II (IGF-II) with Multiple Plasma Proteins: HIGH AFFINITY BINDING OF PLASMINOGEN TO IGF-II AND IGF-BINDING PROTEIN-3
J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 9994 - 10000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. A. M. Salih, S. Mohan, Y. Kasukawa, G. Tripathi, F. A. Lovett, N. F. Anderson, E. J. Carter, J. E. Wergedal, D. J. Baylink, and J. M. Pell
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-5 Induces a Gender-Related Decrease in Bone Mineral Density in Transgenic Mice
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 931 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. D. Payet, S. M. Firth, and R. C. Baxter
The Role of the Acid-Labile Subunit in Regulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor Transport across Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Monolayers
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2382 - 2389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. A. M. Salih, G. Tripathi, C. Holding, T. A. M. Szestak, M. I. Gonzalez, E. J. Carter, L. J. Cobb, J. E. Eisemann, and J. M. Pell
Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5 (Igfbp5) compromises survival, growth, muscle development, and fertility in mice
PNAS, March 23, 2004; 101(12): 4314 - 4319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Baron-Hay, F. Boyle, A. Ferrier, and C. Scott
Elevated Serum Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-2 as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 10(5): 1796 - 1806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Butt, K. A. Dickson, F. McDougall, and R. C. Baxter
Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein-5 Inhibits the Growth of Human Breast Cancer Cells in Vitro and in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 29676 - 29685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. M. Firth and R. C. Baxter
Cellular Actions of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2002; 23(6): 824 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S.-E. Kong, R. C. Baxter, and P. J. D. Delhanty
Age-Dependent Regulation of the Acid-Labile Subunit in Response to Fasting-Refeeding in Rats
Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4505 - 4512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S.-E. Kong, S. M. Firth, R. C. Baxter, and P. J. D. Delhanty
Regulation of the acid-labile subunit in sustained endotoxemia
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2002; 283(4): E692 - E701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Firth, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baxter, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Firth, S. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals