help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldkamp, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scherbaum, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feldkamp, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scherbaum, W. A.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 9 4250-4253
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

Soluble Fas Is Increased in Hyperthyroidism Independent of the Underlying Thyroid Disease

Joachim Feldkamp, Elke Pascher, Matthias Schott, Peter Goretzki, Jochen Seissler and Werner A. Scherbaum

Departments of Endocrinology and Surgery (P.G.), Heinrich Heine University, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany; and German Diabetes Research Institute (J.S.), D-40225, Dusseldorf, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Joachim Feldkamp, M.D., Department of Endocrinology, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany. E-mail feldkamj{at}uni-duesseldorf.de

Abstract

In Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, Fas-induced apoptosis is one of the mechanisms leading to cell destruction, whereas thyroid tissue in Graves’ disease is prevented from it. The soluble form of the Fas molecule produced by alternative splicing prevents from apoptosis. We measured soluble Fas in the sera of 112 patients with Graves’ disease, 21 patients with toxic goiter, and 24 patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism due to suppressive therapy with levothyroxine after near-total resection of the thyroid gland for nodular goiter.

Soluble Fas was increased in thyrotoxic patients, toxic goiter, and patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism. Decreased levels of soluble Fas were found in euthyroid patients with Graves’ disease after surgery, whereas soluble Fas was normal in euthyroid patients with Graves’ disease receiving antithyroid drug treatment and in patients in stable remission. There was a good correlation between soluble Fas with free T3 (r = 0.6) and free T4 (r = 0.5). Our results show that soluble Fas is increased in hyperthyroidism independent of the underlying thyroid disease.

APOPTOSIS IS RARELY seen in thyroid tissue from patients with Graves‘ disease, whereas it is common in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (1, 2, 3). One of the underlying mechanisms of programmed cell death or the prevention of it involves the Fas/Apo 1 molecule (CD95) (4). This member of the TNF/nerve growth factor receptor family induces apoptosis via activation by its physiological ligand or by anti-Fas-specific antibodies (5, 6). The Fas system plays a major role in maintaining homeostasis in the immune system. Deletion of autoreactive T cells is mediated by the Fas/Fas ligand interaction (7, 8, 9, 10, 11). The Fas molecule is expressed by various tissues, including the thyroid gland (12).

Alternative splicing results in a soluble form of the Fas molecule (sFas) that lacks the transmembrane region (13). The killing mechanism of Fas functions via the membrane-bound Fas molecule, whereas sFas protects against apoptosis (14, 15). sFas was found in low concentrations in the sera of healthy subjects and at elevated concentrations in the sera of patients with autoimmune diseases, malignancy, and inflammatory disorders (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). Shimaoka et al. reported elevated levels of sFas in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases (20). Thyrotoxic patients with Graves’ disease had elevated sFas levels, whereas patients in remission and euthyroid patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis had decreased levels. These results were confirmed in one other study from Japan, and elevated levels have been documented in patients with Graves’ opthalmopathy (22, 23).

The aim of our study was to investigate the changes in serum levels of sFas in patients with Graves’ disease in different stages and after definitive treatment and in patients with nonautoimmune thyroid diseases.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects

sFas was measured in 112 patients (mean age, 43.2 ± 11.8 yr) with Graves’ disease recruited in our out-patient clinic (Table 1Go). Five subgroups of patients could be established. Thirty-six thyrotoxic patients (42.9 ± 13.0 yr) were freshly diagnosed as having Graves’ disease and were untreated. Forty euthyroid patients were taking stable doses of antithyroid drugs (methimazole or carbimazole). To determine differences between patients with regard to duration of therapy, 18 patients (41.9 ± 12.7 yr) taking antithyroid drug medication for less than 6 months were compared with 22 patients (42.5 ± 10.6 yr) treated for longer than 6 months (6–30 months). Sixteen patients (45.8 ± 15.9 yr) were in stable remission without any therapy, and 20 patients (42.9 ± 12.9 yr) had undergone surgery for Graves’ disease at least 6 months previously and were receiving substitution therapy with levothyroxine. Graves’ disease was diagnosed by suppressed levels of TSH and elevated levels of free T3 (fT3) and free T4 (fT4), increased 99mTc uptake, and positive TSH receptor antibodies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics in patients and controls

 
sFas was additionally determined in 21 thyrotoxic patients with toxic nodular goiter (mean age, 49.2 ± 7.1 yr) and in 24 patients (mean age, 41,1 ± 8.1 yr) with exogenous subclinical hyperthyroidism due to treatment with levothyroxine after near-total resection for nodular goiter. These patients had suppressed TSH values and fT3 and fT4 levels within the normal range. The mean thyroid remnant size after surgery was 2.0 ± 1.2 ml.

A group of 36 healthy blood donors (mean age, 39.7 ± 11.1 yr) served as controls. All patients without Graves’ disease and all controls were negative for TSH receptor antibodies.

All serum samples were frozen and stored at -20 C until the determination of sFas.

The study was approved by the local ethic committee. All patients and controls gave informed consent.

Determination of sFas

sFas was determined by a nonisotopic sandwich immunoassay (Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, MA). In brief, a monoclonal mouse antibody, specific for the human Fas protein, is immobilized onto the surface of plastic wells. Serum (100 µl), diluted 1:10, or standards are pipetted into the wells and incubated for 1 h. After washing, a biotinylated detector monoclonal antibody is added and incubated for 1 h. After another washing, this detector antibody, in turn, is bound by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin, which catalyzes the conversion of the chromogenic substrate tetra-methylbenzidine from a colorless to a yellow solution after the addition of a stopping reagent. The colored reaction product is quantified by measuring absorbance at dual wavelengths of 450/540 nm. The sFas concentration is determined by interpolation after preparing a standard curve from sFas standards.

fT3, and fT4, and TSH were determined using a commercially available luminescence immunoassay (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA). The normal ranges for fT3 was 2.93–6.16 pmol/liter, and that for fT4 was 1.16–2.7 pmol/liter.

TSH receptor antibodies were measured by RIA (Medipan, Germany), with normal values less than 9 IU/liter. Antibodies against thyroid peroxidase (normal, <100 U/liter) and Tg (normal, <200 U/liter) were determined by RIA (B.R.A.H.M.S., Berlin, Germany). The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation, respectively, were 7.4% and 4.8% for sFas, 5.2% and 6.5% for fT3, 3.9% and 10.3% for fT4, 4.2% and 9.3% for TSH (third generation assay), and 7.8% and 9.7% for TSH receptor antibodies.

Statistics

All variables were analyzed for normal distribution (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Data are expressed as the mean ± SE unless otherwise stated. Analyses with more than two variables were analyzed using a standard ANOVA with Scheffé’s test, with post-hoc comparison. Pearson’s correlation was used to assess the strength of association between values with normal distribution. Values not normally distributed were calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using StatView (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).

Results

Compared with controls, thyrotoxic patients with GD, patients with toxic goiter, and patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism had significantly higher levels of fT3 and fT4 (Table 1Go), but patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism had significantly (P < 0.01) lower levels of fT3 and fT4 compared with thyrotoxic patients.

In normal healthy controls the mean serum level of sFas was 6.35 ± 1.6 IU/ml (Fig. 1Go). No significant difference was found between men (n = 14) and women (n = 22). In thyrotoxic patients with Graves’ disease sFas was significantly increased (9.1 ± 2.2 IU/ml) compared with levels in controls and patients receiving antithyroid drug treatment (P < 0.001 for both). In euthyroid patients who had been treated with antithyroid drugs for less than 6 months sFas was increased (6.5 ± 1.02 IU/ml) compared with that in patients receiving long-term treatment (5.41 ± 0.98 IU/ml; P = 00.2), but was significantly lower (P < 0.001) than that in newly diagnosed patients. No significant difference could be seen when all patients receiving antithyroid drug treatment were compared with controls. Additionally, no significant difference existed between sFas levels of patients in remission (5.87 ± 1.08 IU/ml) and controls, but patients who underwent surgery had significantly decreased (P = 0.02) sFas values (5.35 ± 1.1 IU/ml). sFas was significantly increased (P < 0.001) in thyrotoxic patients (10.1 ± 1.76 IU/ml) with toxic goiter compared with all other groups, with the exception of thyrotoxic patients with Graves’ disease. Patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism had significantly lower sFas levels (7.7 ± 1.63 IU/ml) than thyrotoxic patients (Graves’ disease and toxic goiter), but significantly increased values compared with controls (P < 0.001).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. sFas values in patients and controls. GD, Graves’ disease; ATDT, patients receiving antithyroid drug treatment for less and for more than 6 months, respectively; Subclin. Hyperthyr., subclinical hyperthyroidism. Thick lines, mean; thin lines, SD.

 
TSH receptor antibodies showed a slight, but significant, correlation (r = 0.256; P = 0.007) with sFas levels (Fig. 2Go). A correlation existed also between fT3 (r = 0.19) and fT4 (r = 0.2), respectively, and TSH receptor antibodies (data not shown). sFas correlated with fT3 (r = 0.6; P < 0.01; Fig. 3Go) and with fT4 (r = 0.5; P < 0.01). In the subgroups of patients there was also a significant (P < 0.01) correlation between sFas and free T3 (r = 0.51 for all patients with Graves’ disease; r = 0.58 for patients with toxic goiter; r = 0.3 for patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism; r = 0.3 for controls).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Correlation between sFas and TSH receptor antibodies (r = 0.256; P = 0.007) in patients with Graves’ disease.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Correlation between sFas and fT3 (r = 0.6; P < 0.001) in patients and controls.

 
Discussion

The clinical significance of soluble forms of the human Fas molecule is poorly understood. Various conditions may lead to increased levels of sFas in human serum (16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). The intact Fas molecule consists of an intracellular, a transmembrane, and an extracellular domain. A region called the death domain, which shows homology to TNF receptors, is required to propagate its apoptotic signal (4). Activation of the Fas molecule either by the Fas ligand or by specific antibodies leads to cell destruction, which is mediated by a family of cysteine proteases (caspases) (24).

In human thyroid tissue the Fas antigen is functionally expressed on the surface of thyrocytes (25, 26, 27, 28, 29). The role of the Fas system in different autoimmune thyroid diseases may be either in promoting apoptosis or protecting the follicle cell from programmed cell death. In Hashimoto’s thyroiditis Fas-mediated apoptosis has been observed and is regulated by various cytokines (26, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36).

In thyroid tissues from patients with Graves’ disease apoptosis is a rare event, probably due to increased expression of the Bcl-2 protein, which exerts a high antiapoptotic activity (1). As the soluble form of the Fas molecule has been shown to prevent apoptosis, it could be expected that sFas might be increased in serum of patients with Graves’ disease (14). Recently, it has been demonstrated that sFas was increased in thyrotoxic patients and decreased in patients in remission (20).

In our own study all patients with elevated levels of fT3 and fT4 and patients with suppressed TSH had increased sFas values. This was true for patients with autoimmune Graves’ disease as well as for patients with nonautoimmune thyroid disease (toxic goiter). Patients with subclinical hyperthyroidism due to suppressive doses of levothyroxine had increased sFAs levels, but did not attain the levels in patients with frank hyperthyroidism. This suggests that increases in sFas levels are much more a consequence of hyperthyroidism itself than a sequel of autoimmune thyroid diseases. This was confirmed by a good correlation of sFas with fT3 and fT4 in the overall group of patients and in all subgroups. Shimaoka et al. reported a high correlation of sFas with TSH receptor antibodies and speculated that sFas levels might be dependent on activation of the autoimmune process (20). If sera with negative TSH receptor antibodies were removed in their study, there was no longer a correlation between TSH receptor antibodies and sFas. In our own cohort of patients with Graves’ disease, TSH receptor antibodies correlated much weaker with sFas (r = 0.25).

In conclusion, the elevated sFas levels in hyperthyroidism seem to be dependent on the extent of hyperthyroidism. It cannot be ruled out that minor changes in sFas levels might be attributed to autoimmune thyroid diseases. Shimaoka (20) reported decreased sFas levels in euthyroid patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, whereas they were normal in hypothyroid patients with the same disease, but a total of only 32 patients were investigated. We did not have the opportunity to determine sFas levels in hypothyroid subjects due to the very small number of cases observed during the study period.

One of the main functions of the Fas/Fas ligand system is the deletion of activated B and T cells. It can be speculated from the results of our study that thyroid hormones exert direct effects on the immune system via activation of the Fas/Fas ligand system. Whether this leads in consequence to a reduced rate of Fas-induced apoptosis of target cells via protection by sFas or to an increase in apoptotic events by up-regulation of the membrane-bound Fas molecule is speculative. Other cofactors, such as cytokines (IL-1, interferon-{gamma}, and others), may modulate this system, and further investigations are necessary to elucidate the role of thyroid hormones in apoptotic processes. The source of sFas in patients with hyperthyroidism is lymphocytes rather than thyrocytes, as patients with only very small thyroid remnants and subclinical hyperthyroidism after surgery also had elevated sFas values. Our results are in concordance with other observations showing an influence of hyperthyroidism on the immune system (37, 38). Similar results have been shown for serum levels of the soluble IL-2 receptor and adhesion molecules such as intracellular adhesion molecule-1, indicating the interaction between thyroid hormones and the immune system (39, 40).

Acknowledgments

We thank T. B. West for critically reading the manuscript.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: fT3, Free T3; fT4, free T4; sFas, soluble Fas.

Received October 11, 2000.

Accepted May 8, 2001.

References

  1. Tanimoto C, Hirakawa S, Kawasaki H, Hayakawa N, Ota Z 1995 Apoptosis in thyroid diseases: a histochemical study. Endocr J 42:193–201[Medline]
  2. Hammond LJ, Lowdell MW, Cerrano PG, et al. 1997 Analysis of apoptosis in relation to tissue destruction associated with Hashimoto’s autoimmune thyroiditis. J Pathol 182:138–144[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ludgate M, Jasani B 1997 Apoptosis in autoimmune and non-autoimmune thyroid disease [Editorial]. J Pathol 182:123–124[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Itoh N, Yonehara S, Ishii A, et al. 1991 The polypeptide encoded by the cDNA for human cell surface antigen Fas can mediate apoptosis. Cell 66:233–243[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Nagata S, Golstein P 1995 The Fas death factor. Science 267:1449–1456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Debatin KM, Beltinger C, Bohler T, et al. 1997 Regulation of apoptosis through CD95 (APO-I/Fas) receptor-ligand interaction. Biochem Soc Trans 25:405–410[Medline]
  7. Ettinger R, Panka DJ, Wang JK, et al. 1995 Fas ligand-mediated cytotoxicitiy is directly responsible for apoptosis of normal CD4+ T cells responding to a bacterial superantigen. J Immunol 154:4302–4308[Abstract]
  8. Hanabuchi S, Koyanagi M, Kawasaki A, et al. 1994 Fas and its ligand in a general mechanism of T-cell-mediated cytotoxicitiy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:4930–4934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lowin B, Hahne M, Mattmann C, et al. 1994 Cytolytic T-cell cytotoxicity is mediated through perforin and Fas lytic pathways. Nature 370:650–652[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Stalder T, Hahn S, Erb P 1994 Fas antigen is the major target molecule for CD4+ T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J Immunol 152:1127–1133[Abstract]
  11. Ju ST, Panka DJ, Cui H, et al. 1995 Fas/(CD95)/FasL interactions required for programmed cell death after T-cell activation. Nature 373:444–448[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Xerri L, Devilard E, Hassoun J, et al. 1997 Fas ligand is not only expressed in immune privileged human organs but is also coexpressed with Fas in various epithelial tissues. Mol Pathol 50:87–91[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cascino I, Fiucci G, Papoff G, et al. 1995 Three functional soluble forms of the human apoptosis-inducing Fas molecule are produced by alternative splicing. J Immunol 154:2706–2713[Abstract]
  14. Cheng J, Zhou T, Liu C, et al. 1994 Protection from Fas-mediated apoptosis by a soluble form of the Fas molecule. Science 263:1759–1762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Papoff G, Cascino I, Eramo A, et al. 1996 An N-terminal domain shared by Fas/Apo-1/CD95) soluble variants prevents cell death in vitro. J Immunol 156:4622–4630[Abstract]
  16. Nozawa K, Kayagaki N, Tokano Y, et al. 1997 Soluble Fas (APO-1, CD95) and soluble Fas ligand in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum 40:1126–1129[Medline]
  17. Mizutani Y, Yoshida O, Bonavida B 1998 Prognostic significance of soluble Fas in the serum of patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 160:571–576[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Fadeel B, Samuelsson A, Hachiya T, et al. 1996 Elevated serum levels of soluble Fas/APO-1 in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals. Blood 88:4727–4730[Free Full Text]
  19. Jodo S, Kobayashi S, Nakajima Y, et al. 1998 Elevated serum levels of soluble Fas/APO-1 (CD95) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Exp Immunol 112:166–171[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Shimaoka Y, Hidaka Y, Okumura M, et al. 1998 Serum concentration of soluble Fas in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Thyroid 8:43–47[Medline]
  21. Kato M, Tamada Y, Kageyama M, et al. 1998 Elevated soluble Fas levels in herpes zoster patients. Br J Dermatol 138:1091
  22. Hiromatsu Y, Bednarczuk T, Soyeima E, et al. 1999 Increased soluble Fas in patients with Graves’ disease. Thyroid 9:341–345[Medline]
  23. Ohtsuka K, Hashimoto M 2000 Serum levels of soluble Fas in patients with Graves’ ophtalmopathy. Br J Ophtalmol 84:103–106[CrossRef]
  24. Nicholson D, Ali A, Thornberry NA, et al. 1995 Identification and inhibition of the ICE/CED-3 protease necessary for mammalian apoptosis. Nature 376:37–43[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kawakami A, Eguchi K, Matsuoka N 1996 Thyroid-stimulating hormone inhibits Fas antigen-mediated apoptosis of human thyrocytes in vitro. Endocrinology 137:3163–3169[Abstract]
  26. Kawakami A, Eguchi K, Matsuoka N 1997 Modulation of Fas-mediated apoptosis of human thyroid epithelial cells by IgG from patients with Graves’ disease (GD) and idiopathic myxoedema. Clin Exp Immunol 110:434–439[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Arscott PL, Knapp J, Rymaszewski M, et al. 1997 Fas (APO-1, CD95)-mediated apoptosis in thyroid cells is regulated by a labile protein inhibitor. Endocrinology 138:5019–5027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Giordano C, Stassi G, De Maria R 1997 Potential involvement of Fas and its ligand in the pathgenesis of Hashimotos’s thyroiditis. Science 275:960–963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Feldkamp J, Pascher E, Schott M, et al. 1999 Fas-mediated apoptosis is inhibited by TSH and iodine in moderate concentrations in primary human thyrocytes in vitro. Horm Metab Res 31:355–358[Medline]
  30. Arscott PL, Baker Jr JR 1998 Apoptosis and thyroiditis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 87:207–211[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Stassi G, Todaro M, Bucchieri F, et al. 1999 Fas/Fas ligand-driven T cell apoptosis as a consequence of ineffective thyroid immunoprivilege in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. J Immunol 162:263–267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Batteux F, Tourneur L, Trebeden H, et al. 1999 Gen therapy of experimental autoimmune thyroiditis by in vivo administration of plasmid DNA coding for the Fas ligand. J Immunol 162:603–608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Batteux F, Lores P, Bucchini D, et al. 2000 Transgenic expression of Fas ligand on thyroid follicular cells prevents autoimmune thyroiditis. J Immunol 164:1681–1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bretz JD, Arscott PL, Myc A, et al. 1999 Inflammatory cytokine regulation of Fas-mediated apoptosis in thyroid follicular cells. J Biol Chem 274:25433–25438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Borgerson Kl, Bretz JD, Baker JR Jr 1999 The role of Fas-mediated apoptosis in thyroid follicular cells. Autoimmunity 30:251–264[Medline]
  36. Bluher M, Krohn K, Wallaschofski H, et al. 1999 Fas and Fas ligand gene expression in autoimmune thyroiditis in BB/W rats. Eur J Endocrinol 141:506–511[Abstract]
  37. Koukkou E, Panayiotidis P, Alevizou-Terzaki V, et al. 1991 High levels of serum soluble interleukin-2 receptors in hyperthyroid patients: correlation with serum thyroid hormones and independence from the etiology of the hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 73:771–776[Abstract]
  38. Smallridge RC, Tsokos GC, Burmann KD, et al. 1997 Soluble interleukin-2 receptor is a thyroid hormone-dependent early-response marker in the treatment of thyrotoxicosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 4:583–586[Abstract]
  39. Nakanishi K, Taniguchi Y, Onji M 1999 Triiodothyronine enhances expression of the interleukin-2 receptor {alpha} chain. Endocr J 46:437–442[Medline]
  40. Wenisch C, Myskiw D, Gessl A, et al. 1995 Circulating selectins, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in hyperthyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:2122–2126[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Fountoulakis, G. Vartholomatos, N. Kolaitis, S. Frillingos, G. Philippou, and A. Tsatsoulis
Differential expression of Fas system apoptotic molecules in peripheral lymphocytes from patients with Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 158(6): 853 - 859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feldkamp, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scherbaum, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feldkamp, J.
Right arrow Articles by Scherbaum, W. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals