help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 8 3877-3881
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

Isolated GH Deficiency with Dominant Inheritance: New Mutations, New Insights

G. Binder, E. Keller, M. Mix, G. G. Massa, W. H. Stokvis-Brantsma, J. M. Wit and M. B. Ranke

University-Children’s Hospital and Growth Research Center, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; University-Children’s Hospital, 04317 Leipzig, Germany; University-Children’s Hospital, 18055 Rostock, Germany; and Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Gerhard Binder, M.D., Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, University-Children’s Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, Tübingen 72076, Germany.

Abstract

Autosomal dominantly inherited isolated GH deficiency is caused by mutations of GH-1 that alter the normal structure of GH. We studied 16 familial cases and 1 sporadic case with isolated GH deficiency type II from 1 Dutch and 4 German families by direct sequencing of PCR-amplified genomic DNA and ectopic transcript analysis of lymphocyte mRNA. In addition, the clinical data of the affected individuals were analyzed. Two previously reported mutations and 1 novel splice site mutation in intron III of GH-1 (+1G to C and +1G to A; new, +2T to C) were detected that cause exon 3 skipping. We also discovered a novel G6191to T missense mutation in exon 4 of GH-1 that changes valine 110, which is highly conserved in mammalian and several nonmammalian GH, to phenylalanine. Splicing of the primary RNA transcript was not affected by this mutation, which is very likely to alter the normal GH structure at the protein level.

The onset of growth failure was earlier, and the degree was more severe in affected children with GH-1 splice site mutations compared with those in children with the GH-1 missense mutation. In addition, the severity of the phenotype was variable, even within the same family. The age at diagnosis was between 0.8–9.6 yr (median, 5.1 yr); height at diagnosis was between -2.5 and -8.1 SD score (median, -4.0). Most of the children were lean at diagnosis, with a body mass index ranging from -1.7 to +3.3 SD score (median, -0.5). The 5 affected adults had final heights between -1.8 and -4.5 SD score (median, -3.6), centripetal obesity, and muscular hypotrophy. Before therapy, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 serum levels of all affected children were severely diminished (<<5th percentiles for age). The maximum GH peak in a total of 25 stimulation tests was between 0.1–5.0 µg/liter (median, 0.9), indicating severe GH deficiency. The height of the adenohypophysis studied by magnetic resonance imaging was normal in 2 affected children and mildly decreased in 2 others. Substitution with GH resulted in good catch-up growth in all treated children.

Children with severe GH and IGF-I deficiencies, but normal size of the adenohypophysis should be examined for GH-1 splice site and missense mutations. The observed discrepancy between the very homogeneous hormone data proving severe GH and IGF-I deficiencies and the high variability of growth failure even within the same family suggests that the onset and predominance of GH-dependent growth during infancy are individually different and modified by as yet unknown factors.

THE MAJORITY OF cases with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) are idiopathic (1). Monogenetic recessive inheritance of IGHD was shown to be caused by complete deletions of the GH-1 (IGHD IA) (2) and, more recently, by nonsense mutations of the GHRH receptor gene (3). Until recently, dominant transmission (IGHD II) was exclusively found in the presence of GH-1 splice site mutations, which cause skipping of exon 3 (4, 5). This in-frame deletion results in the loss of 40 amino acids and a presumably misfolded del32–71GH. The prevalence of such mutations in families with IGHD II is high, up to 100% (6). The mechanism of the dominant negative effect of the mutant protein is only partly understood (7). In vitro studies suggested cell-specific mechanisms in neuroendocrine cells that included insufficient storage and secretion of the wild-type GH in the presence of the del32–71GH (8, 9). Seven different splice site mutations in intron 3 of GH-1 have been reported (4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). In addition, two GH-1 missense mutation (P89L and R183H) were recently implicated in IGHD II (15, 16).

In this study we present molecular and clinical data on 16 affected individuals from 4 families and 1 sporadic case with IGHD II that provide new insights in IGHD.

Subjects

The pedigrees of the five unrelated families (no. 1–5) are shown in Figs. 1Go, 2Go, and 3Go. Families 4 and 5 have been reported previously (5, 17). All affected children were prepubertal at diagnosis and had normal free T4, TSH, PRL, and cortisol levels. Basal serum levels of IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) were determined in all but 1 patient. Two independent GH stimulation tests were performed in 7 patients, the insulin test only was performed in 3 patients, and no test was performed because of young age (<1.0 yr) in 2 patients, of whom 1 had a pathologically low GH level during spontaneous hypoglycemia. Of the 12 affected children, 11 were treated with recombinant human GH sc (median dose, 0.17 mg/kg·wk). Magnetic resonance imaging with narrow scanning of the pituitary region and gadolinium injection was performed in 4 patients and 1 affected parent from 3 families. Blood samples for genetic analysis were taken after obtaining informed consent from parents and patients.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pedigrees of families 1 and 2 and electrophoretic analysis of the amplified GH-1 fragment from family members (no. 1–9) and normal controls (C) after restriction enzyme digestion with MvnI (family 2) or NlaII (family 1), whose recognition sites are underlined. The bands of the digested fragments are indicated by the arrow. Both heterozygous splice site mutations generate one new recognition site for the respective enzyme, which is evident by the appearance of two smaller bands after digestion. M, Mol wt marker.

 


View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Pedigree of family 3 and electrophoretic analysis of the amplified GH-1 fragment from family members (no. 1–9) and one normal control (C) after restriction enzyme digestion with MaeII, whose recognition site is underlined. The band of the undigested fragment is indicated by the arrow. Because the heterozygous mutation destroys the recognition site for MaeII, the DNA fragment of the affected family members is incompletely digested. M, Mol wt marker.

 


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The pedigrees of the previously reported families 4 and 5. Filled symbols indicate the individuals with the GH-1 mutation.

 
Materials and Methods

Hormone measurements

Serum GH levels were measured in different clinical centers by several assays (RIA, ELISA, and enzyme immunoassay) that had the same cut-off level of 10 µg GH/liter for the normal response to stimulation. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations in families 1, 2, 3, and 5 were determined using the same assays by Blum et al. (18).

DNA and RNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 ml frozen EDTA blood using an extraction kit (Genomix Blood Scale-Up, Talent, Triest, Italy) that was based on chloroform extraction after initial blood lysis. Total RNA from peripheral lymphocytes was extracted according to the method described by Chomczynski and Sacchi (19).

Oligonucleotide primers

For the RT reaction, the primer used corresponded to nucleotides 6578–6600 (GH3.2) of the reported GH-1 sequence (20). The PCR was performed using GH3.2 and the upstream primer 5503–5525 (GH5.1). The upstream primer of the nested PCR corresponded to nucleotides 5555–5577 (GH5.2), and the downstream primer corresponded to nucleotides 6547–6568 (GH3.4). For restriction digest analysis with MvnII, NlaIII, and DdeI, the nested PCR was performed with the upstream primer GH5.7 (5816–5835) and the downstream primer GH3.7 (6121–6140). The primers used for sequencing were GS5.8 (5629–5648) and GS3.8 (6495–6515).

RT-PCR of RNA

RNA (5 µg) was reversibly transcribed in PCR buffer, and the total cDNA was amplified by nested PCR as previously described (5). The PCR product (10 µl of the reaction volume) were electrophoresed on 8% PAGE.

PCR of genomic DNA

Genomic DNA was amplified by nested PCR. The first PCR was performed with 0.2 µg gDNA, 100 pmol of each primer GH5.1 and GH3.1, 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (QIAGEN, Hamburg, Germany), and 0.2 mmol/liter of each deoxy-NTP in QIAGEN PCR buffer with a final volume of 50 µl. The reaction mixture was cycled 30 times (95 C for 60 sec, 65 C for 60 sec, and 72 C for 90 sec). An aliquot of this reaction (0.2 µl) was amplified in the nested PCR using the upstream primer GH5.2 and the downstream primer GH3.4 or, alternatively (for restriction analysis), the sense primer GH5.7 and the antisense primer GH3.7.

Restriction digest

The 325-bp fragment of GH-1 (5816–6140) containing the complete intron 3 was digested with 20 U MvnII, 20 U NlaIII, or 10 U DdeI (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) in a volume of 30 µl containing 10 µl PCR product for 3 h. The 1014-bp fragment of GH-1 (5555–6568) containing the genomic sequence from exon 2 to exon 5 was digested with 4 U MaeII (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) under the same conditions. The fragments were visualized by ethidium bromide staining after electrophoresis on an 8% polyacrylamide gel.

Direct sequencing

Both strands of the PCR products were directly sequenced with the Thermo Sequenase cycle sequencing kit containing 7-deaza-deoxy-GTP. The reaction was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). The sequencing primers were 5'-labeled with IR-800 fluorescent dye. The products were run under denaturing conditions on a Li-COR DNA automatic sequencer 4200.

Results

Direct sequencing of the PCR-amplified genomic DNA resulted in the detection of a heterozygous point mutation of the first base of the donor splice site of intron 3 in the affected individuals of families 1, 4, and 5. In detail, we found a G to A transition in family 1 and the G to C transversion reported previously by us in families 4 and 5 (5, 17). A new splice site mutation with a T to C transition of the second base of the intron 3 donor splice site was detected in family 2. Restriction fragment analysis of a 327-bp DNA fragment (5816–6140) containing the complete intron 3 with NlaII (family 1) and MvnI (family 2; Fig. 1Go), and with DdeI (families 4 and 5) (5, 17) detected the mutation in all affected, but in no unaffected, individuals of the four families. Ectopic transcript analysis of lymphocyte mRNA was performed in the proband of family 5 and revealed the presence of a shortened mRNA lacking exon 3 (Fig. 4Go, lane 1) (5).



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Electrophoretic analysis of the amplified GH-1 cDNA. Lane 1 contains the amplified cDNA from a patient with the GH-1 intron 3 +1G to C donor splice site mutation (family 5), which [compared with the normal control (C)] demonstrates a shortening of the major fragment (arrow b) and loss of exon 3. The same analysis from one patient with the novel G6191to T missense mutation (V110F) is shown in lane 2. The main fragment is identical in size to the control fragment (C), excluding missplicing (arrow a). M, Mol wt marker.

 
In family 3 we detected a novel heterozygous point mutation in exon 4 with a G to T transversion at position 6191. Cosegregation with GH deficiency was proven by restriction fragment analysis with MaeII, demonstrating heterozygous loss of the MaeII recognition site in all affected individuals (Fig. 2Go). Because the G6191 to T mutation was inside an exonic motif that was homologous to a sequence reported to act as an exonic splicing enhancer in the human IgM gene (21), we performed ectopic transcript analysis of peripheral lymphocyte RNA. The main GH mRNA fragment found was identical to controls, excluding a defect of primary RNA splicing (Fig. 4Go, lane 2). The missense mutation results in an amino acid exchange from valine to phenylalanine at position 110 of the mutant GH (V110F GH). The alignment of GH sequences revealed that Val110 is highly conserved in mammalian and several nonmammalian GH (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Alignment of the human GH sequence (amino acids 104–117) with the sequences from mammalian and nonmammalian GHs. The valine at position 110 is highly conserved and is located next to the N-terminal beginning of the third {alpha}-helix.

 
The clinical characteristics and the serum hormone levels of the affected children at the time of diagnosis are summarized in Table 1Go. The SD scores were taken from the report by Prader et al. (22). For better comparison of the genotype-phenotype relation, the clinical data from the children with GH-1 splice site mutations (families 1, 2, 4, and 5) and from the children affected by the GH-1 missense mutation (family 3) are shown separately. The age at diagnosis and the degree of short stature were variable, even in members of the same family. This variability could not be correlated to the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 serum levels or to the GH peaks reached in stimulation tests (Table 1Go). Overall, children with GH-1 splice site mutations showed a tendency to an earlier onset and more severe degree of growth failure than children with the GH-1 missense mutation (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and hormone levels of 12 children with IGHD II at diagnosis

 
The IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were pathologically low in all affected children (<<5th percentiles for age; Table 1Go). The stimulated GH levels were very low in all tested probands regardless of the stimulus. A GH level above 3 µg/liter was reached in 3 of 25 stimulation tests; the highest level was 5.0 µg/liter (normal cut-off for the used assays, 10 µg/liter; Table 1Go). The median bone age delay was 1.6 yr (range, 0.5–3.6). Only 2 children (5.1 and 7.1 yr old at diagnosis) were overweight with body mass index SD scores of 2.2 and 3.3. Therapy with 0.17 mg/kg recombinant human GH sc weekly has been initiated in 10 children for more than 2 yr. The median height velocity during the first 2 yr of therapy increased to 10.0 cm/yr (range, 7.0–12.5), which was equivalent to a median amplification of the growth velocity by 2.1-fold (range, 1.7–3.6). Magnetic resonance imaging of the hypophysis showed normal morphology and normal adenohypophyseal height according to Argyropoulou et al. (23) in 2 affected children from families 2 and 5 (-0.5 and -0.6 SD scores) and a normal hypophysis with mildly reduced height in 2 children from families 1 and 2 (-2.5 and -2.6 SD scores) and in one adult (family 1). The 5 affected adults with GH-1 splice site mutations (4 females) had short stature with a height SD score of -3.6 (-2.7 to -4.2), centripetal obesity, and muscular hypotrophy, but normal fertility. The IGF-I serum levels were severely reduced. The mother with V110F GH had short normal stature (-1.8 SD score), but also centripetal obesity and muscular hypotrophy. Her 7 pregnancies were reportedly uneventful.

Discussion

All affected individuals of the five families whose pedigrees suggested an autosomal dominant transmission of IGHD carried a deleterious point mutation of GH-1, suggesting a very high prevalence of these mutations in IGHD II. One novel splice site mutation found in one family affected the highly conserved second base of the intron 3 donor splice site (+2T to C). The predicted effect of this mutation, as shown for mutations of the first base of intron 3, is the skipping of exon 3 during splicing (4, 5). The resultant del32–71 GH protein exerts a dominant negative effect on the wild-type GH that is cell specific and not observed in nonsecretory cell types such as Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphocytes (7) or COS cells (8, 9). Heterodimer formation between wild-type GH and del32–71 GH that lacks one cysteine at position 53 was the first hypothetical proposal for the dominant negative effect (4). This theory has recently been questioned by the finding that the recombinant double mutant del32–71,C165A GH that lacks the unpaired cysteine at position 165 had the same effect in vitro (9). Neither del32–71 GH nor wild-type GH accumulates in neuroendocrine cell lines, indicating a decrease in intracellular stability (9) whose molecular basis is still unknown (24). In this context it is of importance that missense mutations of GH-1 also result in a mutant GH with a dominant negative effect.

Here, we report for the first time the V110F mutation of GH-1. Its genetic basis is a C to T transition in a CpG dinucleotide that is a general hotspot for mutations in vertebrate genomes (25). This mutation changes a valine that is completely conserved in mammalians and in some amphibians and birds to phenylalanine. Valine is located next to the N-terminal beginning of the third {alpha}-helix and is integrated in the closely packed core of the four-{alpha}-helix bundle of GH (26). The more bulky phenylalanine at this position is very likely to introduce steric hindrance. Two other GH-1 missense mutations that cosegregate with IGHD II were recently reported: P89L and R183H (15, 16). Similar to V110F, both mutations change highly conserved amino acids. Proline 89 forms a kink in the second {alpha}-helix of GH that leucine is not able to form (24). Arginine 183 is next to the disulfide bond of cysteine 182, whose formation may be disturbed by the more bulky histidine (24). However, the effects of the two missense mutations in cultured neuroendocrine cells have yet not been shown.

In the past screening for GH-1 defects was performed if severe growth failure with a height below -4.5 SD score at diagnosis was present (6). Severe short stature according to this definition was only present in one third of our affected individuals at diagnosis, indicating that growth failure in IGHD II is less severe than would be expected. The children with the splice site mutations were younger and shorter at diagnosis than their counterparts with the missense mutation. Moderate growth failure was also reported for the family with the P89L mutation (16). In addition, we observed in three of our families a pronounced intrafamilial variability between siblings in both mutation groups with height differences exceeding 3.0 SD score. This variability in growth did not correlate with the severity of GH or IGF-I deficiency, because the hormone levels were very low in all tested subjects, including those affected individuals with the highest growth velocity and only minor growth failure. There is no substantial evidence for a course of slow progression of GH deficiency in IGHD II as was described for the dominantly inherited vasopressin deficiency (24). Factors other than systemic GH and IGF-I levels must be responsible for the differences in growth failure. These unknown factors obviously modulate the start and predominance of GH-dependent growth. Some of these unknown factors may also be involved in the high variability of growth failure reported in Laron syndrome (27).

Data on the systematic examination of the pituitary anatomy in monogenetic disorders are scarce (28). Approximately 50% of the hormone-producing cells of the anterior pituitary are somatotrope cells (29). Recent magnetic resonance imaging observations in children with idiopathic GHD suggested a positive relationship between the volume of the adenohypophysis and the secretory GH capacity (30). This is not the case in IGHD II; the four children examined by magnetic resonance imaging showed a normal adenohypophysis in two cases and mild hypoplasia in the two others. Normal size of the anterior hypophysis was also reported in two children affected with IGHD IA, suggesting that the presence of GH is not a prerequisite for normal size of the adenohypophysis (31).

The combination of normal or almost normal height of the adenohypophysis and the presence of severe GH and IGF-I deficiencies is highly suggestive of the presence of a causative GH-1 mutation. In such cases the molecular diagnosis establishes the basis for genetic counseling and the recommendation of a life-long substitution with GH. The high variability in growth failure in the presence of severe GH and IGF-I deficiencies, even within the same family, suggests that the onset and predominance of GH-dependent growth during infancy are individually different and modified by as yet unknown factors.

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Schütt for fruitful discussions, P. Schwarze for language editing, and C. Urban for technical assistance.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: IGFBP, IGF-binding protein; IGHD, isolated GH deficiency.

Received December 14, 2000.

Accepted April 20, 2001.

References

  1. Pfäffle R, Blankenstein O, Wuller S, Heimann K, Heimann G 2000 Idiopathic growth hormone deficiency: a vanishing diagnosis? Horm Res 53(Suppl 3):1–8
  2. Phillips III JA, Hjelle B, Seeburg PH, Zachmann M 1981 Molecular basis for familial isolated growth hormone deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:6372–6375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wajnrajch MP, Gertner JM, Harbison MD, Chua Jr SC, Leibel RL 1996 Nonsense mutation in the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor causes growth failure analogous to the little mouse. Nat Genet 12:88–90[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Cogan JD, Phillips III JA, Sakati N, Frisch H, Schober E, Milner D 1993 Heterogenous growth hormone (GH) gene mutations in familial GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:1224–1228[Abstract]
  5. Binder G and Ranke MB 1995 Screening for growth hormone (GH) gene splice-site mutations in sporadic cases with severe isolated GH deficiency using ectopic transcript analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:1247–1252[Abstract]
  6. Wagner JK, Eble A, Hindmarsh PC, Mullis PE 1998 Prevalence of human GH-1 gene alterations in patients with isolated growth hormone deficiency. Pediatr Res 43:105–110[Medline]
  7. Binder G, Brown M, Parks JS 1996 Mechanisms responsible for dominant expression of human growth hormone gene mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:4047–4050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hayashi Y, Yamamoto M, Ohmori S, Kamijo T, Ogawa M, Seo H 1999 Inhibition of growth hormone (GH) secretion by a mutant GH-1 gene product in neuroendocrine cells containing secretory granules: an implication for isolated GH deficiency inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2134–2139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lee MS, Wajnrajch MP, Kim SS, et al. 2000 Autosomal dominant growth hormone (GH) deficiency type II: the del32–71-GH deletion mutant suppresses secretion of wild-type GH. Endocrinology 141:883–890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Cogan JD, Ramel B, Lehto M, et al. 1995 A recurring dominant negative mutation causes autosomal dominant growth hormone deficiency–a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80:3591–3595[Abstract]
  11. Cogan JD, Prince MA, Lekhakula S, et al. 1997 A novel mechanism of aberrant pre-mRNA splicing in humans. Hum Mol Genet 6:909–912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Misarelli C, Herrera L, Mericq V, Carvallo P 1997 Two different splice site mutations in the growth hormone gene causing autosomal dominant growth hormone deficiency. Hum Genet 101:113–117[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hayashi Y, Kamijo T, Yamamoto M, et al. 1999 A novel mutation at the donor splice site of intron 3 of the GH-1 gene in a patient with isolated growth hormone deficiency. Growth Horm IGF Res 9:434–437[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. McCarthy EM, Phillips III JA 1998 Characterization of an intron splice enhancer that regulates alternative splicing of human GH pre-mRNA. Hum Mol Genet 7:1491–1496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gertner JM, Wajnrajch MP, Leibel RL 1998 Genetic defects in the control of growth hormone secretion. Horm Res 49(Suppl 1):9–14
  16. Duquesnoy P, Simon D, Netchine I, et al. 1998 Familial isolated growth hormone deficiency with slight height reduction due to a heterozygote mutation in GH gene [Abstract]. Proc of the 80th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Society. 1998; P02–202
  17. Massa GG, Binder G, Oostdijk W, Ranke MB, Wit JM 1998 De novo mutations of the growth hormone gene: an important cause of congenital isolated growth hormone deficiency? Eur J Pediatr 157:272–275[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Blum WF, Albertsson-Wikland K, Rosberg S, Ranke MB 1993 Serum levels of insulin-like gowth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) reflect spontaneous growth hormone secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:1610–1616[Abstract]
  19. Chomczynski P and Sacchi N 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159[Medline]
  20. Chen EY, Liao Y-C, Smith DH, Barrera-Saldana HA, Gelinas RE, Seeburg PH 1989 The human growth hormone locus: Nucleotide sequence, biology, and evolution. Genomics 4:479–497[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Watakabe A, Tanaka K, Shimura Y 1993 The role of exon sequences in splice site selection. Genes Dev 7:407–418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Prader A, Largo HR, Molinari L, Issler C 1989 Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age. Helv Paediat Acta [Suppl] 52:3–31
  23. Argyropoulou M, Perignon F, Brunelle F, Brauner R, Rappaport R 1991 Height of normal pituitary gland as a function of age evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 21:247–249[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Dannies PS 2000 Protein folding and deficiencies caused by dominant-negative mutants of hormones. Vitam Horm 58:1–26[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Cooper DN, Krawczak M, Antonorakis SE 1995 In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, eds. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease, 7th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 259–291
  26. Ultsch MH, Somers W, Kossiakoff AA, deVos AM 1994 The crystal structure of affinity-matured human growth hormone at 2 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 236:286–299[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Wood KA, Savage MO 1996 Laron syndrome: typical and atypical forms. Bailliere Clin Endocrinol Metab 10:371–387[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Murray RA, Maheshwari HG, Russell EJ, Baumann G 2000 Pituitary hypoplasia in patients with a mutation in the growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor gene. Am J Neuroradiol 21:685–689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Thorner MO, Vance ML, Laws ER, Horvath E, Kovacs K 1998 The anterior pituitary. In: Wilson JD, Foster D, Kronenberg HM, Larsen PR, eds. William’s textbook of endocrinology, 9th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 256
  30. Hamilton J, Blaser S, Daneman D 1998 MR imaging in idiopathic growth hormone deficiency. Am J Neuroradiol 19:1609–1615[Abstract]
  31. Zucchini S, Ambrosetto P, Baroncini C, Cacciari E 1996 Normal pituitary size in two patients with growth hormone gene deletion. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 9:545–548[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. S. Alatzoglou, J. P. Turton, D. Kelberman, P. E. Clayton, A. Mehta, C. Buchanan, S. Aylwin, E. C. Crowne, H. T. Christesen, N. T. Hertel, et al.
Expanding the Spectrum of Mutations in GH1 and GHRHR: Genetic Screening in a Large Cohort of Patients with Congenital Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 3191 - 3199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Dateki, K. Hizukuri, T. Tanaka, N. Katsumata, P. Katavetin, and T. Ogata
An immunologically anomalous but considerably bioactive GH produced by a novel GH1 mutation (p.D116E)
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 161(2): 301 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Murphy, J. Baptista, J. Holly, A. M. Umpleby, S. Ellard, L. W. Harries, J. Crolla, T. Cundy, and A. T. Hattersley
Severe Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Atypical Diabetes Associated with a Translocation Breakpoint Disrupting Regulation of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 Gene
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2008; 93(11): 4373 - 4380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Petkovic, D. Lochmatter, J. Turton, P. E. Clayton, P. J. Trainer, M. T. Dattani, A. Eble, I. C. Robinson, C. E. Fluck, and P. E. Mullis
Exon Splice Enhancer Mutation (GH-E32A) Causes Autosomal Dominant Growth Hormone Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4427 - 4435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Hess, Y. Hujeirat, M. P. Wajnrajch, S. Allon-Shalev, Z. Zadik, I. Lavi, and Y. Tenenbaum-Rakover
Variable Phenotypes in Familial Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency Caused by a G6664A Mutation in the GH-1 Gene
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4387 - 4393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
D. I Iliev, N. E Wittekindt, M. B Ranke, and G. Binder
In vitro analysis of hGH secretion in the presence of mutations of amino acids involved in zinc binding
J. Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 39(2): 163 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Salemi, S. Yousefi, D. Lochmatter, A. Eble, J. Deladoey, I. C. A. F. Robinson, H.-U. Simon, and P. E. Mullis
Isolated Autosomal Dominant Growth Hormone Deficiency: Stimulating Mutant GH-1 Gene Expression Drives GH-1 Splice-Site Selection, Cell Proliferation, and Apoptosis
Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 45 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J. P G Turton, C. R Buchanan, I. C A F Robinson, S. J B Aylwin, and M. T Dattani
Evolution of gonadotropin deficiency in a patient with type II autosomal dominant GH deficiency
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 155(6): 793 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Vivenza, L. Guazzarotti, M. Godi, D. Frasca, B. di Natale, P. Momigliano-Richiardi, G. Bona, and M. Giordano
A Novel Deletion in the GH1 Gene Including the IVS3 Branch Site Responsible for Autosomal Dominant Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 980 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S. Salemi, S. Yousefi, K. Baltensperger, I. C A F Robinson, A. Eble, D. Simon, P. Czernichow, G. Binder, E. Sonnet, and P. E Mullis
Variability of isolated autosomal dominant GH deficiency (IGHD II): impact of the P89L GH mutation on clinical follow-up and GH secretion
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 153(6): 791 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. E. Mullis, I. C. A. F. Robinson, S. Salemi, A. Eble, A. Besson, J.-M. Vuissoz, J. Deladoey, D. Simon, P. Czernichow, and G. Binder
Isolated Autosomal Dominant Growth Hormone Deficiency: An Evolving Pituitary Deficit? A Multicenter Follow-Up Study
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2089 - 2096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
P. E Mullis
Genetic control of growth
Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 152(1): 11 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. C. C. Ryther, A. S. Flynt, B. D. Harris, J. A. Phillips III, and J. G. Patton
GH1 Splicing Is Regulated by Multiple Enhancers Whose Mutation Produces a Dominant-Negative GH Isoform That Can Be Degraded by Allele-Specific Small Interfering RNA (siRNA)
Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2988 - 2996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. W. E. Meyer, D. Korthaus, W. Jagla, E. Cornali, J. Grosse, H. Fuchs, M. Klingenspor, S. Roemheld, M. Tschop, G. Heldmaier, et al.
A Novel Missense Mutation in the Mouse Growth Hormone Gene Causes Semidominant Dwarfism, Hyperghrelinemia, and Obesity
Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2531 - 2541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. V. Fofanova, O. V. Evgrafov, A. V. Polyakov, A. B. Poltaraus, V. A. Peterkova, and I. I. Dedov
A Novel IVS2 -2A>T Splicing Mutation in the GH-1 Gene in Familial Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency Type II in the Spectrum of Other Splicing Mutations in the Russian Population
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 820 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. McGuinness, C. Magoulas, A. K. Sesay, K. Mathers, D. Carmignac, J.-B. Manneville, H. Christian, J. A. Phillips III, and I. C. A. F. Robinson
Autosomal Dominant Growth Hormone Deficiency Disrupts Secretory Vesicles in Vitro and in Vivo in Transgenic Mice
Endocrinology, February 1, 2003; 144(2): 720 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binder, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ranke, M. B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals