help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tschugguel, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tschugguel, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, J. C.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 8 3833-3839
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

Estrogen Increases Endothelial Carbon Monoxide, Heme Oxygenase 2, and Carbon Monoxide-Derived cGMP by a Receptor-Mediated System

Walter Tschugguel, Felix Stonek, Zydi Zhegu, Wolf Dietrich, Christian Schneeberger, Thomas Stimpfl, Thomas Waldhoer, Walter Vycudilik and Johannes C. Huber

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine (W.T., F.S., W.D., C.S., J.C.H.); Institute of Vascular Biology and Thrombosis Research (Z.Z.); Institute of Forensic Medicine (T.S., W.V.); and Institute for Tumor Biology and Cancer Research (T.W.), University of Vienna Medical School, General Hospital, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Walter Tschugguel, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Vienna Medical School, General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail walter.tschugguel{at}akh-wien.ac.at

Abstract

Carbon monoxide, a gaseous activator of soluble guanylyl cyclase formed by a subtype of the enzyme heme oxygenase designated heme oxygenase-2 in vascular endothelium, has been found to dilate blood vessels independently from nitric oxide. Because of the parallels between nitric oxide and carbon monoxide, we speculated that estrogen might affect carbon monoxide production in vascular endothelium. Endothelial cells of human origin (umbilical vein and uterine artery) were incubated for 4 or 24 h with 10-12–10-6 M 17ß-estradiol. 17ß-Estradiol, at a concentration such as that attained during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle (10-10 M), administrated for 4 h led to a 2-fold increase in intracellular carbon monoxide production and heme oxygenase-2 protein levels (P < 0.05). A reporter assay, measuring the formation of cGMP as the direct product of carbon monoxide-induced activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase in endothelial cells, also revealed a 56% increase in cellular cGMP after treatment with 10-10 M E2 17ß-estradiol (P < 0.05). By contrast, higher 17ß-estradiol concentrations had no significant respective effects due to nitric oxide synthase inhibition of carbon monoxide release. This 17ß-estradiol effect appeared to be ER dependent, as preincubation with tamoxifen (10-6 M) blocked the stimulatory effect of 17ß-estradiol in each instance. Our preliminary data indicate a potential role for carbon monoxide as a biological messenger molecule in estrogen-mediated regulation of vascular tone.

THE INCIDENCE OF cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of mortality in western societies, is higher in men than in premenopausal women, but increases in postmenopausal women (1). An abundance of epidemiological data supports a role for estrogens in this atheroprotective effect, prompting recommendations for their widespread use in postmenopausal replacement therapy (2).

However, the mechanism by which estrogen mediates vasoprotection remains to be fully clarified. It is traditionally thought to be due to potentially favorable changes in blood lipids and lipoproteins (3), but a number of human (4, 5) as well as animal studies strongly suggest a direct effect on the vascular system (6, 7) acting via vascular ER (4, 5).

17ß-Estradiol (E2) accounts for the endothelial expression of rate-limiting enzymes in the biosynthesis of the two important vasodilators, prostacyclin and nitric oxide (NO). E2 potentiates the effect of endothelin-1 on prostacyclin production in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) (8) and causes increased transcription of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene (9) as well as activation of eNOS (10) and NO release (11) in endothelial cells via nongenomic mechanisms.

Heme oxygenase (HO) is the rate-limiting enzyme for heme degradation in mammals (12). It decomposes heme into biliverdin and releases free iron and carbon monoxide (CO). To date, three isoforms of HO have been characterized: HO1, HO2, and HO3 (13, 14). HO1 is widely expressed and is inducible by a host of stimuli that produce oxidative stress (15). On the other hand, HO2 occurs in neuronal populations and vascular endothelial cells (16), and the only known inducer of HO2 is adrenal glucocorticoid (17). HO3 has recently been identified in the rat heart, kidney, brain, and liver (14). Both vascular endothelium and smooth muscle express heme oxygenases (16, 18), and HO-catalyzed formation of CO has been documented in blood vessels (19). Upon endothelial release, CO diffuses to the underlying vascular smooth muscle cells to elicit relaxation by increasing cGMP production independently from NO (18, 20, 21), to cause hyperpolarization by opening potassium channels (22), and to decrease the production of vasoconstrictors such as endothelin (23).

NO is a well established effector molecule of E2-mediated vasoprotection. Because of the apparent parallels between NO and CO, we sought to clarify preliminarily whether at physiological levels E2 modulates CO production, HO2 protein and mRNA levels, and levels of cGMP, a direct product of NO- and CO-induced activation of soluble guanylate cyclase in HUVEC and human uterine artery endothelial cells (HAUEC) in both the presence and absence of estrogen and antiestrogen.

Materials and Methods

Endothelial cell culture

HUVEC and HAUEC were isolated from female umbilical veins and hysterectomized uteri, respectively as previously described (24). Cells were passaged on gelatin-coated 25-cm2 flasks (Costar, Cambridge, MA) in phenol red-free medium 199 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) containing 20% heat-inactivated FCS (HyClone Laboratories, Inc., Logan, UT) and supplemented with penicillin (1000 IU/ml), streptomycin (1 mg/ml), fungizone (25 µg/ml; penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone solution, JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS), endothelial cell (EC) growth supplement (50 µg/ml; Technoclone, Vienna, Austria), and heparin (5 IU/ml; Hoffman-LaRoche Inc., Basel, Switzerland). Cells were used within four passages and were identified as endothelial by their characteristic cobblestone morphology, the presence of factor VIII antigen, and uptake of acetylated low density lipoprotein. Forty-eight hours before the experiments, heparin and endothelial cell growth supplement were removed from the medium. ECs were treated with E2 (Sigma) over a range of concentrations and time points, as indicated in Results and the figure legends. The role of ER in the response to E2 was determined during incubations performed in the simultaneous presence of 10-6 M tamoxifen (TAM; Sigma) added 1 h before E2. To examine the role of the NOS system on endothelial CO release, different dilutions of the nonspecific NOS inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester (L-NAME; Sigma) were added to cells 30 min before E2 treatment.

CO detection system

CO release by vascular ECs was determined by spectrophotometric detection of CO-hemoglobin (25) in cell culture supernatants. In brief, supernatant was collected from confluent cells at the end of the incubation period. The percentage of COHb was determined spectrophotometrically using a U-3000 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and the amount of pure CO was calculated and expressed as micrograms per liter total supernatant.

Western blotting

For cytosolic fractions, cells were lysed in Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer and further processed as previously described (26). In brief, the concentration of protein in aliquots of the lysates was measured with a bicinchoninic acid kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). Twenty micrograms of cellular extracts were used for experiments, and 5 µg of a rat spleen or a rat brain microsomal preparation (Chemicon, Temecula, CA) were used as positive controls for the detection of HO1 or HO2 protein, respectively. After quantification, proteins were electrophoresed through the use of standard SDS-PAGE on 8–18% gradient gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Membranes were blocked in a solution consisting of 5% nonfat dry milk and 5% BSA (Sigma) in 0.1 mol/liter Tris-HCl, 0.15 mmol/liter NaCl, and 0.01% Nonidet P-40, pH 7.5. Immunoreactions were performed with an anti-HO1 or anti-HO2 polyclonal antibody (StressGen, Victoria, Canada; dilution of both antibodies, 1:2,000). An appropriately diluted polyclonal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) instead of the primary AB was used as a negative control for each AB. This was followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (Pierce Chemical Co.; dilution, 1:20,000). Specific reaction products were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells as previously described (27). Briefly, total RNA was prepared by ultracentrifugation of a guanidine-isothiocyanate lysate through a cesium trifluoroacetate cushion. Precipitated RNA was removed, diluted with absolute ethanol, pelleted by centrifugation, washed with 70% ethanol, dissolved in ribonuclease-free water, and stored at -80 C. The integrity of RNA was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. RT was performed on 500 ng total RNA using 200 U Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (ViennaLab Labordiagnostika GmbH, Vienna, Austria) and a commercially available reagent kit (Random Primed RT-Mix, ViennaLab Labordiagnostika GmbH). Synthesized cDNA was stored in aliquots at -80 C.

The amplification primers and the TaqMan probe for the HO2 real-time PCR (Table 1Go) resulting in a 71-bp amplicon (position 841–911) (28) were designed with Primer-Express software (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA). 6-Carboxyfluorescein was used as the reporter dye, and 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine was used as the quencher dye. Oligonucleotide synthesis and purification were performed by VBC-Genomics Bioscience Research GmbH (Vienna, Austria). The reaction was carried out in a 25-µl total volume containing 2 µl cDNA, 25 pmol of each amplification primer, 5 pmol probe, and 12.5 µl 2 x TaqMan Universal Mix (PE Applied Biosystems). The reaction conditions were 50 C for 2 min, 95 C for 10 min (activation of the AmpliTaq-Gold polymerase), and then 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95 C (denaturation), followed by 60 sec at 60 C (annealing and extension). To correct variations linked to differences in the amount of RNA taken for the reaction or to different levels of inhibition during RT or PCR, we normalized HO2 expression using the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene, a ubiquitously expressed housekeeping gene, as a reference gene. The expression of this housekeeping gene was quantified with the GAPDH Control Reagents Kit from PE Applied Biosystems according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. All HO2 and GAPDH experiments were carried out in triplicate, and several negative controls were included. Fluorescence emission was continuously monitored and analyzed by a GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems) with GeneAmp 5700 SDS software (version 1.1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primer and probe sequences

 
Standard curves

For the generation of HO2 and GAPDH standard curves, we used 2-fold serial dilutions of a HUVEC cDNA sample showing the highest HO2 mRNA expression levels in HO2 real-time RT-PCR as templates. Standard curves were constructed and calculated using GeneAmp 5700 SDS software by plotting the threshold cycle (PCR cycle at which a specific fluorescence becomes detectable) vs. the log of the cDNA starting quantity of each dilution step. These standard curves allowed us to interpolate the unknown HO2 and GAPDH mRNA expression levels in each analyzed sample.

cGMP measurement

HAUEC were cultured under standard culture conditions as described above, incubated with 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sigma; final concentration, 0.5 mM) to inhibit phosphodiesterase activity and with the nonselective NOS inhibitor L-NAME (final concentration, 0.1 mM) to avoid demonstrating a potential effect of NO on cGMP levels. Both inhibitors were administrated 30 min before incubation with E2. Cells were solubilized in lysis buffer [150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma)], and 10 mM EDTA. Cell fragments were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 x g. Quantification of intracellular cGMP levels in cell lysates was assessed using cGMP RIA (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the supplier’s instructions, including an acetylation step. The protein content of the lysates was assessed using a Lowry-based protein assay (DC protein assay, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Richmond, CA). Duplicate measurements were performed on all samples.

Statistical analysis

The values are expressed as the mean ± SD. A preliminary analysis revealed that the datasets conformed to a normal distribution. Comparisons between groups were made using the exact version of the Wilcoxon test in SAS (SAS/STAT, 1989) (29). Adjustment for multiple testing was performed using the Bonferroni-Holm procedure (30). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Effect of E2 on CO levels

Four-hour incubation of HUVEC and HAUEC with E2 increased CO levels in the cell culture supernatant in a biphasic pattern, from 15 and 24 µg/liter at baseline to 32 and 39 µg/liter at 10-10 M E2, respectively (P < 0.05), whereas TAM pretreatment fully blocked this effect in both instances (Fig. 1Go, A and C). Neither 1 h (not shown) nor 24 h (Fig. 1BGo) of E2 treatment affected the levels of CO released.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The effect of E2 incubation on CO release of HUVEC (A and B) and HAUEC (C). Cells were treated with ethanol (<0.1%; vehicle for E2, used as a negative control) or E2 for 4 h (A and C) or 24 h (B), or were pretreated with TAM 1 h before E2. Bars represent the mean ± SD of six (HUVEC) and five (HAUEC) experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. control.

 
As depicted in Fig. 2Go, preincubation of HAUEC with a high L-NAME concentration (10 mM) elicited an E2-dependent increase in CO release at 10-10 M E2, which remained elevated at 10-6 M E2 vs. baseline (P < 0.05), whereas lower concentrations of L-NAME (0.1 mM) had no significant effect on CO levels.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of L-NAME (0.1 and 10 mM final concentrations) on HAUEC CO release in both the absence and presence of 4-h E2 treatment of cells. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 relative to baseline levels before administration of L-NAME or E2.

 
Effect of E2 on HO1 and HO2 protein

Using an antibody specific for detection of HO1 protein with an approximate molecular mass of 32 kDa, HUVEC were shown to be negative for HO1 protein (Fig. 3Go). By contrast, using a specific HO2 antibody that detects a 36-kDa HO2 protein, HUVEC were positive for HO2 protein, even under untreated conditions (Fig. 3Go). Furthermore, similar to CO levels, 4-h incubation of HUVEC and HAUEC with E2 induced HO2 protein levels in a biphasic pattern (Fig. 3Go), reaching significance at 10-10 M E2 (P < 0.05), showing 96% and 120% increases compared with incubation of cells with vehicle, respectively (Fig. 4Go). TAM pretreatment fully prevented the E2-mediated increase in HO2 protein levels (Figs. 3Go and 4Go), demonstrating a receptor-dependent mechanism of E2-mediated increase in HO2 protein in those cells. However, at 1 h (not shown) or 24 h (Figs. 3Go and 4BGo) of treatment, E2 did not change the levels of HO2 protein.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The effect of E2 on HO1 and HO2 protein levels in HUVEC (A) and HAUEC (B) shown by Western blot analysis. Positive controls for both HO1 and HO2 antibodies and cells treated with ethanol (negative control, 0) or E2 for 4 or 24 h or pretreated with TAM 1 h before E2 were then analyzed for HO1 and HO2 protein, respectively. Similar findings were observed in seven (HUVEC) or five (HAUEC) independent experiments.

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Densitometric analysis of HO2 protein in HUVEC (A and B) and HAUEC (C). Cells were treated with ethanol (vehicle for E2), or E2 for 4 h (A and C) or 24 h (B) or were pretreated with TAM 1 h before E2 and then analyzed for HO2 protein, respectively. Bars represent arbitrary densitometric units and are shown as the mean ± SD of seven (HUVEC) and five (HAUEC) independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. control.

 
E2 induced HO2 gene expression in HUVECs

After 1 h of treatment, E2 induced HO2 mRNA expression in HUVECs in a biphasic pattern, reaching significance only at a concentration of 10-10 M E2 (P < 0.05), showing a 17% increase compared with the control value (ethanol, <0.1%, used as a vehicle for E2; Fig. 5Go). To ascertain ER involvement in the noted E2 response, HUVECs were incubated with 10-6 M of the partial ER antagonist TAM 1 h before E2 treatment. TAM pretreatment fully prevented E2-stimulated HO2 gene expression (Fig. 5Go), whereas TAM alone, used to evaluate a potential agonistic effect of this compound, showed no effect on HUVEC HO2 mRNA expression (not shown). These data clearly demonstrate that E2 at a concentration such as that attained during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle up-regulates HO2 mRNA levels in HUVEC by a receptor-dependent mechanism. However, at 4 h (Fig. 5Go) or 24 h (not shown) of treatment, E2 did not change the levels of HO2 mRNA.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis of HO2 mRNA expression in HUVECs is shown. Cells were treated with ethanol (vehicle for E2) or E2 for 1 h (A) or 4 h (B) or were pretreated with TAM 1 h before E2 and then analyzed for HO2 mRNA expression levels, respectively. Bars represent HO2 mRNA expression levels relative to controls (C) and are shown as the mean ± SD of four independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. control.

 
Effect of E2 on cellular cGMP

In subsequent experiments the functional significance of increased cellular CO production was assessed by measuring the intracellular formation of cGMP, a direct product of NO- and CO-induced activation of guanylate cyclase. Experiments were performed after NOS inhibition to avoid potential interactions between the NO and CO systems (12, 31). Four-hour incubation of HAUEC with 10-10 M E2 increased cGMP levels from 1.8 to 2.8 fmol/1.5 x 103 cells (56% increase from baseline; P < 0.05). This effect of E2 was fully abolished by pretreatment of cells with TAM (Fig. 6Go). However, after stimulation of cells with higher E2 concentrations, cGMP levels returned to baseline (Fig. 6Go).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Intracellular cGMP concentrations were determined in HAUEC after 4-h stimulation with ethanol (vehicle for E2) or increasing E2 concentrations or after TAM pretreatment before E2. The data represent cGMP concentrations (femtomoles per 1.5 x 103 cells; mean ± SD) of at least four independent experiments performed in duplicate. *, P < 0.05 vs. control.

 
Discussion

The mechanisms by which E2 exerts direct protective effects on the vasculature are incompletely understood. In the present preliminary study we focus on a novel pathway introducing CO as a potential new candidate mediating atheroprotective effects of E2. From the amount of CO detected in the medium, we first found that E2-treated endothelial cells of different human origins (HUVEC and HAUEC) released more CO in their culture medium than control cells. The required duration of E2 exposure was 4 h at a concentration such as that attained during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle, and the effect could be inhibited by the E2 antagonists TAM (shown here) and ICI 182,780 (preliminary observations). These data suggest a traditional mechanism of estrogen action involving the functional ERs that have been characterized in this population of cells (32, 33). However, to our knowledge no estrogen-responsive elements or at least half-palindromic sites thereof have been reported in the promoter region of the HO2 gene, suggesting a regulation of CO release by E2 at the level of protein synthesis rather than at the gene level. We therefore explored the endothelial HO2 protein and mRNA.

HO2 protein levels in cells followed a similar course by estrogen treatment. These results support an enhancement by E2 on the protein level of HO2. This would probably occur during protein synthesis or even gene transfer. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR confirmed results at the gene level, except the effect was less pronounced and occurred at 1 h, but not 4 h, of stimulation. From the fact that increased HO2 transcription precedes increased protein levels, it is tempting to speculate that mRNA has been lost in the presence of the more stable protein. The less pronounced effect on the gene (17% increase in HUVEC) compared with the protein level (96% and 120% increase for HUVEC and HAUEC, respectively) further suggests that parts of the HO2 regulation may occur at the protein level independent of gene regulation.

We further observed that E2 elicits CO release with a biphasic concentration dependence, where CO release peaked (32 and 39 µg/L CO, corresponding to 1.1 and 1.3 µmol/L CO) at ovulatory E2 levels, but decreased at higher E2 levels. These effects of E2 are confirmed at the protein and, even less, at the mRNA level. Pertaining to these data, a recent study documented maximal vasodilation (>20% compared with control) in perfused rat afferent juxtamedullary arterioles at CO levels in the superfusate of 1.0 µmol/liter (34), which exactly corresponded to the increased CO levels we observed in HUVEC and HAUEC after appropriate E2 stimulation. Despite the fact that HUVEC/HAUEC and perfused rat arterioles are noncomparable systems, it is intriguing to speculate that ovulatory E2 levels might affect vascular tone by CO concentrations previously shown to maximally reducing vascular tone.

In contrast to causing a peak CO release after 4 h of treatment, a 24-h treatment course with ovulatory E2 concentrations no longer increased cellular CO release. As the CO detection system involves measurement of COHb, in contrast to our finding, one might expect COHb levels to accumulate in the medium with time after cell stimulation. By contrast, we could not find such an accumulation of COHb, which is consistent with a previous report demonstrating a 7-fold increase in vascular smooth muscle cell-derived COHb in coculture with HUVEC after 12-h exposure to hypoxia compared with only a 2-fold increase in COHb after 48-h hypoxia (35). Albeit not further discussed in the latter report, we speculate that the lack of COHb accumulation in medium over time observed here and by others (35) most likely reflects dissociation of CO from COHb (36, 37).

We finally were interested in whether CO release could also be attributable to HO1 protein, but, as expected, failed to detect any HO1 protein in HUVECs, which is consistent with recent data obtained from rats showing that HO1 expression was present in the medial, but not endothelial, layer of carotid arteries (38).

There is strong evidence to support the emerging paradigm that CO, like NO, elicits vasodilation (20, 39, 40, 41). However, CO was reported to be less than 1/1000th as potent as NO as a relaxant (20), raising the question of whether vascular CO release by E2 could be of biological significance in terms of effective vasodilation. Recently, chromium mesoporphyrin (CrMP), a selective HO inhibitor, has been shown to increase the myogenic tone of the small muscular branch of rat femoral arteries, but not of large arterial vessels such as the aorta or the femoral artery, in organ bath experiments (21), an effect that could be blunted by coadministration of CO. These researchers further demonstrated that intravascular pressure is required to elicit vasoconstriction by CrMP, that stepwise increases in vascular pressure amplified the constrictor responses of CrMP, and that unpressurized muscle arterioles could not be contracted by CrMP. From these data the researchers suggested that production of CO by vascular HO subserves a vasodilatory mechanism that contributes to the regulation of basal tone in resistance vessels. However, from those data and from the data obtained by Thorup et al. (34) demonstrating the most pronounced vasodilation in renal afferent arterioles at 1.0 µM CO, the biological significance of CO in regulating vascular tone under normal circumstances remained unclear. We have demonstrated here that E2 at normal ovulatory levels can exert endothelial CO release at a concentration comparable to that previously reported to elicit the most pronounced vasodilation.

We further observed high concentrations of E2 had a lesser or no effect on CO and HO2 levels compared with ovulatory E2 concentrations. This inhibitory effect on further CO release and HO2 levels by high doses of E2 might reflect the ability of E2 to maximally induce vasodilation even at higher concentrations shown to markedly stimulate NO release (42), thereby preventing further endothelial CO production, previously shown to reduce arteriolar diameter (34).

Notably, however, the mechanism of how exposure to high levels of E2 prevents further CO release remained to be defined. As high levels of E2 are a potent inducer of endothelial NO release (42), a possible explanation might be the existence of a compensatory interrelationship between the eNOS and HO2 systems in endothelial cells as previously described (43). Using cultured rat endothelial cells, the latter researchers demonstrated that eNOS mRNA was up-regulated in the presence of the heme oxygenase inhibitor zinc protoporphyrin IX, and HO2 mRNA was up-regulated in the presence of a NOS inhibitor. To test whether NOS inhibition in the cells we studied is capable of affecting endothelial CO release, we exposed HAUEC to increasing concentrations of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME in both the absence and presence of E2. Increasing the amount of L-NAME stimulated both basal and E2-mediated CO release. This effect was significant at a high E2 level, but was less pronounced at an ovulatory E2 concentration, suggesting that marked NO release after high dose E2 administration (42) serves to limit the availability of CO. Such an NO-dependent decrease in CO levels might be required to prevent the reduction in arteriolar diameter that was previously shown to result from unopposed release of high amounts of CO (34). However, a possible limitation of our finding is that we did not measure cell culture supernatant NOx levels, e.g. using the Griess detection method, because the entire supernatant in each instance had to be used for CO detection assay. Due to this limitation, we sought to use L-NAME at a maximal concentration 10 times that previously shown to avoid interactions between the NO and CO systems (44).

Another explanation for how E2 prevents from further CO release could be that high levels of E2 inhibit HO2 activity and thereby CO production via a nonreceptor-dependent system, as was suggested for eNOS activity and NOx levels in HUVEC and bovine aortic endothelial cells (4), but no strong evidence for this can be provided here.

Our data showing E2 to be effective in increasing endothelial CO levels are supported by subsequent experiments, demonstrating an increase in HAUEC cGMP levels after an ovulatory E2 dose, thus providing evidence for a functional relevant heme oxygenase-CO-cGMP system in human uterine artery endothelium. However, it is not apparent at present whether ovulatory E2 levels effectively reduce vascular myogenic tone by an endothelial heme oxygenase-CO-cGMP system. Hence, careful and detailed in vivo studies using, for example, ovariectomized animals with E2 replacement should therefore serve to corroborate our data.

In conclusion, our study shows a previously unknown, perhaps physiological function for estrogen in terms of its vasoprotective properties. Our preliminary data indicate that estrogen at a concentration corresponding to the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle can serve as a CO-inducing agonist in human endothelial cells. This might be of importance when considering treatment with selective ER modulators such as TAM, which was shown here to blunt the effects of estrogen on endothelial CO release, in the case of underlying vascular disease.

Acknowledgments

We thank Barbara Widmar for her excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Jubiläumsfonds der Österreichischen Nationalbank (Grant 8243). Presented in part at the 47th Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Chicago, Illinois, March 2000.

Abbreviations: CO, Carbon monoxide; CrMP, chromium mesoporphyrin; E2, 17ß-estradiol; EC, endothelial cell; eNOS, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HO, heme oxygenase; HAUEC, human uterine artery endothelial cells; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; L-NAME, NG-nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester; NO, nitric oxide; TAM, tamoxifen.

Received July 7, 2000.

Accepted April 7, 2001.

References

  1. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH 1987 Menopause and the risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med 316:1105–1110[Abstract]
  2. Stampfer M, Grodstein F 1994 Cardioprotective effect of hormone replacement therapy. Is not due to selection bias. Br Med J 309:808–809[Free Full Text]
  3. Walsh BW, Schiff I, Rosner B, Greenberg L, Ravnikar V, Sacks FM 1991 Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med 325:1196–1204[Abstract]
  4. Hayashi T, Yamada K, Esaki T, et al. 1995 Estrogen increases endothelial nitric oxide by a receptor-mediated system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 214:847–855
  5. Hishikawa K, Nakaki T, Marumo T, Suzuki H, Kato R, Saruta T 1995 Up-regulation of nitric oxide synthase by estradiol in human aortic endothelial cells. FEBS Lett 360:291–293[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Gisclard V, Miller VM, Vanhoutte PM 1988 Effect of 17-ß estradiol on endothelium-dependent responses in the rabbit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 244:19–22[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kauser K, Rubanyi GM 1994 Gender difference in bioassayable endothelium-derived nitric oxide release from isolated rat aortae. Am J Physiol 267:H2311–H2317
  8. Muck AO, Seeger H, Korte K, Lippert TH 1993 The effect of 17-ß estradiol and endothelin-1 on prostacyclin and thromboxane production in human endothelial cell cultures. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 20:203–206[Medline]
  9. Kleinert H, Wallerath T, Euchenhofer C, Ihrig-Biedert I, Li H, Förstermann U 1998 Estrogens increase transcription of the human endothelial NO synthase gene: analysis of transcription factors involved. Hypertension 31:582–588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chen Z, Yuhanna IS, Galcheva-Gargova Z, Karas RH, Mendelsohn ME, Shaul PW 1999 Estrogen receptor {alpha} mediates the nongenomic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by estrogen. J Clin Invest 103:401–406[Medline]
  11. Caulin-Glaser T, Garcia-Cardena G, Sarrel P, Sessa W, Bender JR 1997 17-ß estradiol regulation of human endothelial cell basal nitric oxide release, independent of cytosolic Ca2+ mobilization. Circ Res 81:885–892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Maines MH 1997 The heme oxygenase system: a regulator of second messenger gases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 37:517–554[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Maines MD, Trakshel GM, Kutty RK 1986 Characterization of two constitutive forms of rat liver microsomal heme oxygenase, only one molecular form is inducible. J Biol Chem 261:411–419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. McCoubrey WK, Huang TJ, Maines MD 1997 Isolation and characterization of a cDNA from the rat brain that encodes hemo-protein heme oxygenase-3. Eur J Biochem 247:725–732[Medline]
  15. Vile GF, Basu-Modak S, Waltner C, Tyrrell RM 1994 Heme oxygenase-1 mediates an adaptative response to oxidative stress in human skin fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2607–2610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zakhary R, Gaine SP, Dinerman JL, Ruat M, Flavahan NA, Snyder SH 1996 Heme oxygenase 2: endothelial and neuronal localization and role in endothelium-dependent relaxation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:795–798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Weber CM, Eke BC, Maines MD 1994 Corticosterone regulates heme oxygenase-2 and NO synthase transcription and protein expression in rat brain. J Neurochem 63:953–962[Medline]
  18. Christodoulides N, Durante W, Kroll M, Schafer AI 1995 Vascular smooth muscle cell heme oxygenase generate guanylyl cyclase stimulatory carbon monoxide. Circulation 91:2306–2309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Cook MN, Marks K, Nakatsu GS, et al. 1995 Heme oxygenase activity in the adult rat aorta and liver as measured by carbon monoxide formation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:515–518
  20. Furchgott RF, Jothianandan D 1991 Endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilatation involving cyclic GMP: relaxation induced by nitric oxide, carbon monoxide and light. Blood Vessels 28:52–61[Medline]
  21. Kozma F, Johnson RA, Zhang F, Yu C, Tong X, Nasjletti A 1999 Contribution of endogenous carbon monoxide to regulation of diameter in resistance vessels. Am J Physiol 276:R1087–R1094
  22. Chen G, Suzuki H, Weston AH 1988 Acetylcholine releases endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor and EDRF from rat blood vessels. Br J Pharmacol 95:1165–1174[Medline]
  23. Morita T, Kourembanas S 1995 Endothelial cell expression of vasoconstrictors and growth factors is regulated by smooth muscle cell-derived carbon monoxide. J Clin Invest 96:2676–2682
  24. Gimbrone M 1976 Culture of vascular endothelium. Prog Hemost Thromb 3:1–28[Medline]
  25. Chalmers AH 1991 Simple, sensitive measurement of carbon monoxide in plasma. Clin Chem 37:1442–1445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pammer J, Plettenberg A, Weninger W, et al. 1996 Cd40 antigen is expressed by endothelial cells and tumor cells in kaposi’s sarcoma. Am J Pathol 148:1387–1396
  27. Kury F, Schneeberger C, Sliutz G, et al. 1990 Determination of her-2/neu amplification and expression in tumor tissue and cultured cells using a simple, phenol free method for nucleic acid isolation. Oncogene 5:1403–1408
  28. McCoubrey WK Jr, Ewing JF, Maines MD 1992 Human heme oxygenase-2: characterization and expression of a full-length cDNA and evidence suggesting that the two HO-2 transcripts may differ by choice of polyadenylation signal. Arch Biochem Biophys 295, 13–20
  29. Cary NC 1989 SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6, 4th Ed, vol2. Cary: SAS Institute
  30. Holm S 1979 A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
  31. Chakder S, Rathi S, Ma XL, Rathan S 1996 Heme oxygenase inhibitor zinc protoporphyrin IX causes an activation of nitric oxide synthase in the rabbit internal anal sphincter. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277:1376–1382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kim-Schulze S, McGowan KA, Hubchak SC, et al. 1996 Expression of an estrogen receptor by human coronary artery and umbilical vein endothelial cell. Circulation 94:1402–1407
  33. Venkov CD, Rankin AB, Vaughan DE 1996 Identification of authentic estrogen receptor in cultured endothelial cells: a potential mechanism for steroid hormone regulation of endothelial function. Circulation 94:727–733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Thorup C, Jones CL, Gross SS, Moore LC, Goligorsky MS 1999 Carbon monoxide induces vasodilation and nitric oxide release but suppresses endothelial NOS. Am J Physiol 277:F882–F889
  35. Morita T, Kourembanas S 1995 Endothelial cell expression of vasoconstrictors and growth factors is regulated by smooth muscle cell-derived carbon monoxide. J Clin Invest 96:2676–2682
  36. Sharma VS, Schmidt MR, Ranney HM 1976 Dissociation of CO from carboxyhemoglobin. J Biol Chem 251:4267–4272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Samaja M, Rovida E 1987 The dissociation of carbon monoxide from the {alpha} and the ß subunits of human carboxy hemoglobin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 148:1196–1201[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Togane Y, Morita T, Suematsu M, Ishimura Y, Yamazaki J, Katayama S 2000 Protective roles of endogenous carbon monoxide in neointimal development elicited by arterial injury. Am J Physiol 278:H623–H632
  39. Vedernikov YP, Graser T, Vanin AF 1989 Similar endothelium-independent arterial relaxation by carbon monoxide and nitric oxide. Biomed Biochim Acta 48:601–601[Medline]
  40. Graser T, Vedernikov YP, Li DS 1990 Study on the mechanism of carbon monoxide induced endothelium-independent relaxation in porcine coronary artery and vein. Biomed Biochim Acta 49:293–296[Medline]
  41. Wang R, Wang Z, Wu L 1997 Carbon monoxide-induced vasorelaxation and the underlying mechanisms. Br J Pharmacol 121:927–934[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Stefano GB, Prevot V, Beauvillain JC, et al. 2000 Cell surface estrogen receptors mediate calcium-dependent nitric oxide release in human endothelia. Circulation 101:1594–1597
  43. Seki T, Naruse M, Naruse K, et al. 1997 Interrelation between nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase in rat endothelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol 331:87–91
  44. Chakder S, Rathi S, Ma XL, Ratan S 1996 Heme oxygenase inhibitor zinc protoporphyrin IX causes an activation of nitric oxide synthase in the rabbit internal anal sphincter. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 277:1376–1382



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
B. Piotrkowski, C. M Monzon, R. M Pagotto, C. G Reche, M. Besio, C. B Cymeryng, and O. P Pignataro
Effects of heme oxygenase isozymes on Leydig cells steroidogenesis
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2009; 203(1): 155 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
L. Wu and R. Wang
Carbon Monoxide: Endogenous Production, Physiological Functions, and Pharmacological Applications
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2005; 57(4): 585 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
V. Bourdeau, J. Deschenes, R. Metivier, Y. Nagai, D. Nguyen, N. Bretschneider, F. Gannon, J. H. White, and S. Mader
Genome-Wide Identification of High-Affinity Estrogen Response Elements in Human and Mouse
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2004; 18(6): 1411 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. Sacerdoti, N. G. Abraham, A. O. Oyekan, L. Yang, A. Gatta, and J. C. McGiff
Role of the Heme Oxygenases in Abnormalities of the Mesenteric Circulation in Cirrhotic Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2004; 308(2): 636 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Orshal and R. A. Khalil
Gender, sex hormones, and vascular tone
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): R233 - R249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
W. Tschugguel, W. Dietrich, Z. Zhegu, F. Stonek, A. Kolbus, and J. C. Huber
Differential Regulation of Proteasome-Dependent Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and {beta} Turnover in Cultured Human Uterine Artery Endothelial Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 2281 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tschugguel, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tschugguel, W.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, J. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals