help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kung, A. W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kohn, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kung, A. W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kohn, L. D.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 8 3647-3653
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Other Original Articles

Epitope Mapping of TSH Receptor-Blocking Antibodies in Graves’ Disease That Appear during Pregnancy

A. W. C. Kung, K. S. Lau and L. D. Kohn

Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital (A.W.C.K., K.S.L.), Hong Kong, China; and Cell Regulation Section, Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (L.D.K.), Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Annie W. C. Kung, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China.

Abstract

Spontaneous remission of Graves’ disease during pregnancy is thought to be due to a reduction of thyroid-stimulating antibody activity. We suspected, however, that a broader change in TSH receptor antibody characteristics might play an important role in modulating disease activity during pregnancy. We measured TSH binding inhibitory Ig, thyroid-stimulating antibody, and thyroid stimulating-blocking antibody activities in 13 pregnant Graves’ disease patients at first, second, and third trimesters and 4 months postpartum. To measure and epitope-map thyroid-stimulating antibody and thyroid stimulating-blocking antibody activities, we used CHO cells transfected with wild-type human TSH receptor or with several TSH receptor-LH/hCG receptor chimeras: Mc1+2, Mc2, and Mc4. These chimeric cells have their respective TSH receptor residues 9–165, 90–165, and 261–370 substituted with equivalent residues of the LH/hCG receptor. Overall thyroid-stimulating antibody decreased, whereas thyroid stimulating-blocking antibody increased progressively during pregnancy. TSH binding inhibitory Ig fluctuated in individual patients, but overall the activities remained statistically unchanged. Thyroid stimulating-blocking antibody appeared in subjects who were either negative for thyroid-stimulating antibody or whose thyroid-stimulating antibody activity increased or decreased during pregnancy. Epitope mapping showed that the thyroid-stimulating antibodies were mainly directed against residues 9–165 of the N-terminus of the TSH receptor extracellular domain. All thyroid stimulating-blocking antibodies had blocking activities against residues 261–370 of the C-terminus of the ectodomain. However, the majority of the thyroid stimulating-blocking antibodies had a hybrid conformational epitope directed against N-terminal residues 9–89 or 90–165 as well. Despite a change in the activity level, we did not observe any change in the epitope of either the stimulatory or blocking Abs as pregnancy advanced. In conclusion, a change in the specificity of TSH receptor antibody from stimulatory to blocking activity was observed during pregnancy, and the appearance of thyroid stimulating-blocking antibody may contribute to the remission of Graves’ disease during pregnancy.

GRAVES’ DISEASE (GD) is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies to the TSH receptor (TSHR), which are pathogenic and responsible for disease activity. It is well recognized that the autoantibodies are heterogeneous, recognizing different epitopes on the TSHR, and that the functional status of the thyroid and the clinical picture of the disease are dependent on the heterogeneity of the TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb) (1). In the last few years, epitope analysis of Graves’ IgG has been performed extensively using site-directed mutagenesis, chimeras of human TSHR (hTSHR) and LH-hCG receptor (LH/CGR), and receptor peptides (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). As a result, it is now recognized that there are multiple forms of functional TSHR autoantibodies: stimulating Abs that activate the TSHR, and nonstimulating antibodies that block TSH binding and action or block thyroid-stimulating antibody (TSAb) as well as TSH action. The epitope for TSAbs is biased more toward the N-terminus of the TSHR ectodomain in 95% of patients (5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). The epitope for blocking Abs that inhibit TSAb and TSH function and that are associated with hypothyroidism in idiopathic myxedema or some Hashimoto’s patients is largely on the C-terminus of the TSHR ectodomain (10, 11, 17, 18, 19). The epitope for blocking Abs in Graves’ patients that inhibit TSH, but not TSAb, activity is largely on the N-terminus of the TSHR ectodomain, overlapping, but not identical, to the TSAb sites (17, 18, 19).

Subtyping the epitopes of the autoantibodies found in GD patients may have clinical relevance, e.g. GD patients with heterogeneous epitope distribution are more likely to become euthyroid after antithyroid during treatment, whereas those with homogeneous epitope directed mainly to the N-terminus of the TSHR ectodomain are less responsive to medical treatment (15, 16). Spontaneous fluctuation of stimulatory and blocking Abs is associated with a change in the clinical profile from hyperthyroidism to hypothyroidism or vice versa (20, 21, 22).

Remission of GD during pregnancy, with recrudescence after delivery, is commonly observed. It is currently believed that remission of GD during pregnancy is primarily due to a reduction in levels of TSAb that results from the generalized immunosuppression needed to accommodate the fetal graft as pregnancy advances (23). However, we recently observed that there was persistent B cell activation in GD patients throughout pregnancy together with appearance of blocking antibodies (24).

To define the epitopes and clinical significance of the thyroid stimulating-blocking antibodies (TBAbs) that appeared during pregnancy, we measured TSH binding inhibitory Ig (TBII) activity, thyroid-stimulating antibodies (TSAb) and TBAb in each patient’s serum at various stages of pregnancy. The stimulating and blocking TRAbs were measured using TSHR/LH-CGR chimeric cell lines that were engineered to remove selective epitopes for the different TRAb. We documented the appearance of blocking antibodies whose epitope on the C-terminus of the TSHR ectodomain is associated with hypothyroidism in idiopathic myxedema or some Hashimoto’s patients. The presence of blocking TRAb may contribute in part to the remission of GD during pregnancy.

Subjects and methods

Thirteen women with GD (aged 29 ± 2 yr) were studied prospectively as soon as pregnancy was confirmed. To avoid possible immunomodulatory action of antithyroid drugs, only patients with mild disease taking no medications or those taking less than 10 mg carbimazole or 100 mg propylthiouracil daily for the preceding 6 months were recruited. Treatment was stopped in the seven patients who were taking antithyroid drugs in the second trimester. Fasting blood samples were obtained in the first trimester (T1; 10–12 wk), the second trimester (T2; 24th wk), and the third trimester (T3; 32–34th wk) and 4 months postpartum. Ten healthy controls were studied at similar stages of pregnancy. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Hong Kong.

Materials and Methods

IgG preparation

Sera were stored at -70 C until IgG preparation. IgGs were extracted by affinity chromatography using protein A-Sepharose CL-4B columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), followed by dialysis. The purity of the IgG preparation was confirmed by documentation of unmeasureable TSH levels and hCG levels of less than 5 ng/ml.

Thyroid function test

Serum free T4 (fT4) was determined by a competitive chemiluminometric immunoassay; TSH was determined by a two-site immunochemiluminometric assay using an Automated Chemiluminescence System (ACS 180, Ciba Corning, Inc., Medfield, MA). The normal range of fT4 was 10–19 pmol/L. The inter- and intraassay coefficients of variance for fT4 and TSH were 4.9% and 3.6%, and 4.8% and 3.6%, respectively. As fT4 assays may give spuriously low results during pregnancy, an abnormal fT4 reading was confirmed with a free T4 index measurement (Abbott Laboratory, North Chicago, IL). The normal range of free T4 index was 76–154.

Thyroid autoantibody assays

The stimulating and blocking TRAbs were measured using CHO cells transfected with wild-type human TSHR (WT cells) or transfected with several TSHR-LH/CGR chimeras: Mc1+2, Mc2, and Mc4 (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25). The Mc1+2, Mc2, and Mc4 chimeras have, respectively, TSHR residues 9–165, 90–165, and 261–370 substituted with equivalent residues of the LH/CGR. Using this panel, the following functional TRAbs can be separately measured. TSAbs in 95% of Graves’ patients whose functional epitopes are on the N-terminal portion of the extracellular domain, residues 9–165, can be measured by comparing the activity of wild-type TSHR transfected cells vs. the activity of the Mc1+2 and Mc2 chimeras. TBAbs whose epitope is on the C-terminal portion of the extracellular domain, residues 261–370, and which block stimulating TRAb as well as TSH activity are readily measured comparing Mc1+2, Mc2, and Mc4 activities with wild-type TSHR transfectants. TBAbs whose epitope on the N-terminus are similarly detected with this comparison.

Thyroid-stimulating antibody (TSAb) was determined in purified IgG by measuring cAMP released from CHO-hTSHR cells (WT cells). In brief, assays were performed in NaCl-free HBSS containing 20 mmol/liter HEPES (pH 7.4), 1% BSA, 0.5 mmol/liter 3-isobuty1-1-methylxanthine, and 222 mmol/liter sucrose to make incubations isotonic. Bovine TSH (1 mU/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or purified IgG (1.5 mg/ml) was dissolved in 300 µl incubation medium and incubated with cells for 2 h at 37 C. Supernatants were aspirated and stored at -20 C. cAMP released into the medium was measured by RIA. TSAb activity was expressed as the percent increase in cAMP levels in the experimental IgG relative to pooled IgG from 20 normal individuals.

TBAb was determined by IgG-induced inhibition of the TSH-stimulated cAMP response in CHO-hTSHR cells (WT cells). To calculate TBAb activity, the following formula was used: 100% x (1 - [(cAMP accumulation in the presence of TSH and test IgG)/cAMP accumulation in the presence of TSH (1 mIU/ml) and normal IgG)]). To further characterize the blocking activity of the IgG, the Igs were also evaluated using Mc1+2, Mc2, and Mc4 cells. Mc1+2 cells are CHO cells transfected with an hTSHR-LH/CGR chimera in which residues 9–165 of TSHR were replaced by residues 101–166 of the LH/CGR. In Mc2 cells, TSHR residues 90–165 were replaced by residues 91–166 of the LH/CGR. In Mc4 cells, TSHR residues 261–370 were replaced by residues 261–329 of the LH/CGR. In Mc4 cells TBAb activity was measured using a TSAb as the stimulant rather than TSH, with otherwise identical calculations (15, 16).

TBII was determined in patients’ sera by inhibition of specific [125I]bovine TSH binding to porcine thyroid membranes in an RRA (PSR, Cardiff, UK). Assay results were expressed in terms of inhibition of TSH binding, calculated as follows: 100% x [1 - (labeled TSH specifically bound in the presence of test serum/labeled TSH specifically bound in the presence of normal serum)].

Triplicate assays were performed on all samples for antibody assays. The cAMP RIA assays (INCSTAR Corp., Stillwater, MN) were performed in duplicate. The normal ranges in 20 healthy subjects for TBII, TSAb, and TBAb were 15% to -15%, 60–145%, and -15% to 20%, respectively. The determination of TSAB and TBAb in the same sample was performed in the same assay. The intra- and interassay coefficients of variance for TBII, TSAb, and TBAb were 5.0% and 8.6%, 6.0% and 8.9%, and 9.7% and 11.6% respectively.

Statistics

Comparisons within GD patients at various stages of pregnancy were made by ANOVA using two-sample t tests or Wilcoxon ranks test depending on the distribution of the data.

Results

Thyroid function tests

Five patients were biochemically hyperthyroid at T1. Two patients were in remission before pregnancy and were not taking any medications. All other patients were taking either 5 mg carbimazole or 50 mg propylthiouracil daily at T1. At T2, all patients were biochemically euthyroid, and all antithyroid drugs were stopped. fT4 levels were significantly lowered by T2 and T3 compared with T1 levels [T1, 18 ± 5 pmol/liter; T2, 13 ± 5 pmol/liter; T3, 13 ± 3 pmol/liter; postpartum (PP), 15 ± 5 pmol/liter; mean ± SD; by ANOVA, P < 0.05].

During T3, two patients had subnormal fT4 levels (both 10 pmol/L). Their fT4 indexes were at the lower limit of normal (76 and 78), but their TSH levels remained within the normal range. One patient relapsed at 4 months PP. All healthy pregnant controls had normal fT4 levels throughout pregnancy.

TSHR antibodies

Two patients (patients 1 and 2; Table 1Go) were negative for all TSHR antibodies throughout pregnancy. Five patients (patients 3, 5, 8, 10, and 13) had TSAb activity at T1. Their TSAb activities decreased progressively in all but 1 patient (patient 8) as pregnancy advanced.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Stimulating TSAb activity (percentage) and blocking TBAb activity (percentage) measured in CHO cells transfected with wild-type human TSHR and TBII activity measured in a commercial assay

 
Three patients (patients 4, 5, and 9; Table 1Go) were positive for TBAb activity at T1. By T2 and T3, the number of patients positive for TBAb increased to 8 and 9, respectively. TBAb activity remained positive in seven patients at 4 months PP.

Six patients (patients 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, and 13; Table 1Go) were positive for TBII at T1. The TBII activity fluctuated in individual patients and showed no correlation with TSAb or TBAb activity at any time during pregnancy. However, TBII was noted to correlate with TSAb (r = 0.76; P < 0.01), but not with TBAb, activity after delivery.

The healthy controls were all negative for TSAb, TBAb, and TBII throughout pregnancy.

Characteristics of the stimulating TSAbs

We characterized the stimulating TSAb epitopes during the different trimesters of pregnancy. Among the five patients positive for TSAbs at T1, two patients (patients 3 and 10; Table 2Go) had a complete loss of the ability of the stimulating TSAb to increase cAMP levels in Mc2 cells (Table 2Go, column 3 vs. column 1). Mc2 cells have TSHR residues 90–165 substituted by the homologous LH/CGR residues. All five patients had a complete loss of TSAb activity in Mc1+2 cells, which had TSHR residues 9–165 substituted (Table 2Go, column 2 vs. column 1). There was no comparable loss when TSAb activity was measured in Mc4 cells, where TSHR residues 261–370 are replaced (Table 2Go, column 4 vs. column 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Stimulating TSHRAb activity measured in CHO cells transfected with wild-type (WT) human TSHR or the Mc2, Mcl+2, and Mc4 TSHR/LH-CGR chimeras

 
Overall, therefore, all of these stimulating antibodies had the major portion of their functional epitopes directed against the N-terminal portions of the extracellular domain of TSHR residues 9–165, with two patients directed against residues 90–165 for their activity. Although the TSAb activity changed during pregnancy, epitope mapping did not reveal any change in the character of the TSAb in individual patients.

Subjects negative for TSAb in the WT cells were all negative for cAMP release in either Mc2, Mc1+2, or Mc4 cells. Similarly, healthy pregnancy women were all negative for TSAb in these cell lines.

Characteristics of blocking TBAbs

To characterize the blocking activity, IgGs were incubated with purified bovine TSH (1 mU/ml) in WT, Mc1+2, and Mc2 cells or with a standard TSAb in WT cells and Mc4 cells. The ability of the IgG to inhibit the stimulating activity of TSH was lost in six patients (patients 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 13; Table 3Go) when their IgGs were incubated with Mc1+2 cells (Table 3Go, column 2 vs. column 1), but retained the inhibitory activity in Mc2 cells (Table 3Go, column 3 vs. column 1). The ability of these TBAb to inhibit the stimulating activity of Graves’ IgG was also lost in Mc4 cells (Table 3Go, column 5 vs. column 4). This pattern is characteristic of a TBAb that has its functional epitope directed against residues 9–89 of the N-terminus as well as residues 261–370 of the C-terminus of the TSHR ectodomain.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Blocking TSHRAb activity measured in CHO cells transfected with wild-type (WT) human TSHR or the Mc2, Mcl+2, and Mc4 TSHR/LH-CGR chimeras

 
IgG from patient 5 (Table 3Go) lost its inhibitory activity when incubated with Mc2 and Mc4 cells, but not Mc1+2 cells, suggesting that its functional epitope was directed against residuals 90–165 as well as residues 261–370 of the TSHR.

For the other three patients (patients 9, 11, and 12; Table 3Go) the ability of the IgGs to inhibit the stimulatory activity of TSH was retained in Mc1+2 cells as well as in Mc2 cells. However, the ability of the IgGs to inhibit the stimulatory activity of Graves’ IgG was lost in Mc4 cells. This suggests that the functional epitope of these TBAb is directed only against TSHR residues 261–370.

Similar to TSAb, there was no change in the TBAb epitope in these patients despite the change in inhibitory activity as pregnancy progressed. None of the healthy pregnant controls showed blocking activities in any of the cell lines at any stage of pregnancy.

Discussion

In this study we characterized the antibodies against the TSHR in GD patients during the various stages of pregnancy. We observed the appearance of blocking antibodies in these subjects as pregnancy advanced and the signs of hyperthyroidism waned. This result extends our previous study using human thyrocytes in primary culture (24), where TBAb detection is more problematic. In this study we used CHO-WT TSHR transfectants together with LH/CG-TSHR chimeras, in which TBAb activity can be measured unequivocally even in the presence of TSAb. Thus, we could now show that blocking antibodies were present in subjects who were negative for TSAb throughout pregnancy as well as in subjects whose TSAb activity decreased or increased during pregnancy.

Similar to previous observations, we noticed that in a majority of the patients TSAb activity decreased as pregnancy advanced. TBII, however, fluctuated in individual patients and showed no correlation to TSAb activity during pregnancy. The separation of TBII and TSAb activity is consistent with data from monoclonal antibody studies and the Shimojo GD model indicating that TBIIs and TSAbs are distinct autoantibody populations (12, 25). A number of animal models of GD have demonstrated that TBII activity from sera of these animals can exist without TSAb activity (26) or that TBII activity precedes TSAb activity (27). The increase in TBAb activity in the absence of a change in TBII activity in the present study probably reflects the fact that TBIIs measure a multiplicity of antibodies that inhibit TSH binding. In GD patients, most TBAbs have their functional epitopes on the N-terminus of the TSHR extracellular domain (17, 18, 19, 28). However, the TBAbs appearing in our pregnant GD patients have a dominant epitope on the C-terminus of the extracellular domain of the TSHR, similar to those found in hypothyroid patients with idiopathic myxedema or some patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (16, 17, 18, 19). Thus, there is a lack of correlation between the TBAb and TBII activities of these patients as the major epitopes of these antibody activities were directed against different parts of the TSHR, i.e. TBAb predominantly against the C-terminus and TBII against the N-terminus of the ectodomain. In light of the importance of detecting TBAb during pregnancy (29, 30), these data suggest that a functional TBAb assay in the chimeras is more revealing than measuring TBII values.

In this report we characterized the epitopes of the stimulatory and blocking Abs using TSHR/LH-CGR chimeric cell lines that were engineered to selectively remove different epitopes for TRAbs. The data once again support the existence of a heterogeneous population of TSHR antibodies in GD patients. Similar to previous studies (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), the stimulatory Abs were predominantly directed against the N-terminal ectodomain of TSHR, residues 9–165. However, unlike previous studies of patients treated with antithyroid drugs (16), we did not observe a change in the epitope of the stimulatory Abs in different individuals as pregnancy advanced. It has been reported that in the patients treated with antithyroid drugs, there was a change in the TSAb epitope from antibodies solely directed against the N-terminal ectodomain residues 9–165 to antibodies recognizing other parts of the TSHR (16).

With respect to the blocking TSHRAbs, all patients had blocking activities requiring the C-terminus of the extracellular domain of the TSHR residues 261–370. However, the majority of these TBAb had a hybrid conformational epitope directed against residues 261–370 as well as the ectodomain N-terminus, residues 9–89 or 90–165. Thus, all patients had blocking activities against a C-terminal ectodomain epitope that was previously reported to be associated with hypothyroidism in patients with idiopathic myxoedema or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (17, 18, 19, 21). We believe that the appearance of this type of TBAb may play a role in modulating thyroid function and contribute toward the remission of thyrotoxicosis in GD during pregnancy, as these TBAbs are able to block TSAb as well as TSH activities, whereas TBAbs directed against the N-terminal epitopes appear to block only TSH activity (18). Although none of our pregnant subjects actually had hypothyroidism, two patients had subnormal fT4 levels together with borderline low fT4 index at T3, when the titers of these blocking antibodies were at their highest. The presence of this type of TBAb may counteract the stimulating TSAb circulating in some of these patients and helps explain why these patients develop biochemical euthyroidism despite the lack of medical treatment. Thus, these data continue to support the conclusion that blocking activities against the C-terminus of the extracellular domain are not confined to patients with idiopathic myxoedema or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, but are also present in patients with GD and can influence the disease course as their levels fluctuate (20, 21).

The exact mechanism accounting for the change from stimulating to blocking antibodies during pregnancy in GD patients is unknown. Whether this is related to the changes in cytokine production in these patients during pregnancy is uncertain. We observed raised IL-10 levels in GD patients throughout pregnancy compared with control values (31). Also, IL-12 levels were suppressed to a greater extent in controls than in GD patients, especially during the second and third trimesters (31). The ratio of IL-10 to IL-12 in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated cultures was much lower in pregnant patients with GD than in normal pregnancy, suggesting that cross-regulation of IL-10 and IL-12 may be deficient in GD during pregnancy. Whether the switch to a type 1 polarized cytokine profile during pregnancy will direct the proliferation of distinct clones of B lymphocytes specific for TBAb instead of TSAB, resulting in the production of predominantly inhibitory antibodies rather than stimulating antibodies, is unclear. Further understanding of this phenomenon during pregnancy may enable development of immunotherapy to induce natural remission of GD. As the appearance of blocking antibodies may be important to fetal development (29, 30), future studies should consider whether this is of potential clinical concern in pregnant women with positive TBAb values in the chimeric assay system.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ms. Karman Yu for typing the manuscript.

Footnotes

This work was supported by a Committee of Research and Conference Grant from University of Hong Kong.

Abbreviations: CGR, hCG receptor; fT4, free T4; hTSH, human TSH; GD, Graves’ disease; PP, postpartum; T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester; TBAb, thyroid stimulating-blocking antibody; TBII, TSH binding inhibitory Ig; TRAb, TSH receptor antibody; TSAb, thyroid-stimulating antibody; TSHR, TSH receptor; WT, wild type.

Received September 14, 2000.

Accepted April 3, 2001.

References

  1. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM 1998 The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: interaction with TSH and autoantibodies. Endocr Rev 19: 673–716
  2. Nagayama Y, Wadsworth HL, Chazenbalk GD, Russo D, Seto P, Rapoport B 1991 Thyrotropin-luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor extracellular domain chimeras as probes for thyrotropin receptor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:902–905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kosugi S, Ban T, Akamizu T, Kohn LD 1992 Identification of separate determinants on the thyrotropin receptor reactive with Graves’ thyroid-stimulating antibodies and with thyroid-stimulating blocking antibodies in idiopathic myxedema: these determinants have no homologous sequence on gonadotropin receptors. Mol Endocrinol 6:168–180[Abstract]
  4. Nagayama Y, Rapaport B 1992 Thyroid stimulatory autoantibodies in different patients with autoimmune thyroid disease do not all recognize the same components of the human thyrotropin receptor: selective role of receptor amino acids Ser 25–Glu 30. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:1425–1430
  5. Kosugi S, Ban T, Kohn LD 1993 Identification of thyroid-stimulating antibody-specific interaction sites in the N-terminal region of the thyrotropin receptor. Mol Endocrinol 7:114–130[Abstract]
  6. Sugawa H, Akamizu T, Kosugi S, et al. 1995 Presence of heterogeneous thyroid-stimulating antibodies in sera from individual Graves’ patients as shown by synthesized thyrotropin receptor peptide application: evidence showing two independent epitopes and a possible recognition of two epitopic regions by one antibody molecular. Eur J Endocrinol 133:283–293[Abstract]
  7. Murakami M, Mori M 1990 Identification of immunogenic regions in human thyrotropin receptor for immunoglobulin G of patients with Graves’ disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 171:512–518[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Murakami M, Miyashita K, Mizuma H, et al. 1996 Discrete characteristics of antibodies raised against thyrotropin receptor-related peptides whose sequences are not conserved in the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1747–1752[Abstract]
  9. Mori T, Sugawa H, Piraphatdist T, Inoue D, Enomoto T, Imura H 1991 A synthetic oligopeptide derived from human thyrotropin receptor sequence binds to Graves’ immunoglobulin and inhibits thyroid stimulating antibody activity but lacks interactions with TSH. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 178:165–172[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Tahara K, Ban T, Minegishi T, Kohn LD 1991 Immunoglobulins from Graves’ disease patients interact with different sites on TSH receptor/LH-CG receptor chimeras than either TSH or immunoglobulins from idiopathic myxedema patients. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 179:70–77[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Nagayama Y, Wadsworth HL, Russo D, Chazenbalk GD, Rapaport B 1991 Binding domains of stimulatory and inhibitory thyrotropin (TSH) receptor autoantibodies determined with chimeric TSH-lutropin/chorionic gonadotropin receptors. J Clin Invest 88:336–340
  12. Morris JC, Berger ER, McCormick DJ 1993 Structure-function studies of the human thyrotropin receptor. J Biol Chem 268:10900–10905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ueda Y, Sugawa H, Akamizu T, et al. 1995 Thyroid stimulating antibodies in sera from patients with Graves’ disease are heterogeneous in epitope recognition. Eur J Endocrinol 132:62–68[Abstract]
  14. Kohn LD, Giuliani C, Montani V, et al. 1995 Antireceptor immunity. In: Rayner D, Champion B, eds. Thyroid immunity. Austin, Georgetown: Landes; 115–170
  15. Kim WB, Cho BY, Park HY, et al. 1996 Epitopes for thyroid-stimulating antibodies in Graves’ sera: a possible link of heterogeneity to differences in response to antithyroid drug treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:1758–1767[Abstract]
  16. Kim WB, Chung HK, Lee HK, Kohn LD, Tahara K, Cho BY 1997 Changes in epitopes for thyroid-stimulating antibodies in Graves’ disease sera during treatment of hyperthyroidism: therapeutic implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:1953–1959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Watanabe Y, Tahara K, Hirai A, Tada H, Kohn LD, Amino N 1997 Subtypes of anti-TSH receptor antibodies classified by various assays using CHO cells expressing wild-type or chimeric human TSH receptor. Thyroid 7:13–19[Medline]
  18. Kohn LD, Hoffman WH, Tombaccini D, et al. 1997 Characterization of monoclonal thyroid stimulating and thyrotropin binding inhibiting autoantibodies from a Hashimoto’s patient whose children had intrauterine and neonatal thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3998–4009[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tahara K, Ishikawa N, Yamamoto K, et al. 1997 Epitopes for thyroid stimulating and blocking autoantibodies on the extracellular domain of the human thyrotropin receptor. Thyroid 7:867–877[Medline]
  20. Kraiem Z, Baron E, Kahana L, Sadeh O, Sheinfeld M 1992 Changes in stimulating and blocking TSH receptor antibodies in a patient undergoing three cycle of transition from hypo to hyperthyroidism and back to hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 36:211–216[Medline]
  21. Chung HK, Kim WB, Park DJ, Kohn LD, Tahara K, Cho BY 1999 Two Graves’ disease patients who spontaneously developed hypothyroidism after antithyroid drug treatment: characteristics of epitpoes for thyrotropin receptor antibodies. Thyroid 9:393–399[Medline]
  22. Kung AWC, Lau KS, Kohn LD 2000 Characterization of thyroid-stimulating blocking antibodies which appeared during transient hypothyroidism after radioactive iodine therapy. Thyroid 10:909–917[Medline]
  23. Weetman AP 1999 The immunology of pregnancy. Thyroid 9:643–646[Medline]
  24. Kung AWC, Jones BM 1998 A change from stimulatory to blocking antibody activity in Graves’ disease during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:514–518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Shimojo N, Kohno Y, Yamaguchi K-I, et al. 1996 Induction of Graves’-like disease in mice by immunization with fibroblasts transfected with the thyrotropin receptor and a class II molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11074–11079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wagle NM, Patibandla SA, Dallas JS, Morris JC, Prabhakar BS 1995 Thyrotropin receptor-specific antibodies in BALB/cJ mice with experimental hyperthyroxinemia show a restricted binding specificity and belong to the immunoglobulin G1 subclass. Endocrinology 136:3461–3469[Abstract]
  27. Kaithamana S, Fan J, Osuga Y, Liang SG, Prabhakar BS 1999 Induction of experimental autoimmune Graves’ disease in BALB/c mice. J Immunol 163:5157–5164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Grasso YZ, Kim MR, Faiman C, Kohn LD, Tahara K, Gupta MK 1999 Epitope heterogeneity of TSH blocking antibodies in Graves’ patients as detected with wild type versus chimeric TSH receptors. Thyroid 9:531–537[Medline]
  29. Brown RS, Keating P, Mitchell E 1990 Maternal thyroid-blocking immunoglobulins in congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70: 1341–1346
  30. Fisher DA 1986 Neonatal thyroid disease in the offspring of women with autoimmune thyroid disease. Thyroid Today 9:1
  31. Jones BM, Kwok JSY, Kung AWC 2000 Change in cytokine production during pregnancy in patients with Graves’ disease. Thyroid 10:701–707[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. Y. Kim, Y. J. Park, D. J. Park, H.-K. Chung, W. B. Kim, L. D. Kohn, and B. Y. Cho
Epitope Heterogeneity of Thyroid-Stimulating Antibodies Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Graves' Patients Treated with Antithyroid Drugs
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 117 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kung, A. W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kohn, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kung, A. W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kohn, L. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals