help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wulff, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wulff, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 7 3377-3386
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Articles

Luteal Angiogenesis: Prevention and Intervention by Treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor TrapA401

Christine Wulff, Helen Wilson, John S. Rudge, Stanley J. Wiegand, Stephen F. Lunn and Hamish M. Fraser

Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit (C.W., H.W., S.F.L., H.M.F.), Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom EH3 9ET; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (J.S.R., S.J.W.), Tarrytown, New York 10591

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. C. Wulff, Medical Research Council Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, 37 Chalmers Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom EH3 9ET. E-mail c.wulff{at}hrsu.mrc.ac.uk

Abstract

The possibility of stimulating or inhibiting paracrine factors regulating angiogenesis may lead to new approaches for the treatment of pathological conditions of the female reproductive tract. We examined the effects of a clinical candidate, a soluble truncated form of the Flt-1 receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor trapA40 (VEGF trap), in a primate model to determine its ability to prevent the onset of luteal angiogenesis or intervene with the on-going process. Marmosets were treated from the day of ovulation until luteal day 3 (prevention regimen) or on luteal day 3 for 1 day (intervention regimen). Effects of VEGF inhibition were studied by obtaining a proliferation index using bromodeoxyuridine incorporation, quantifying endothelial cell area using CD31, and assessing luteal function by plasma progesterone. After both treatments, intense luteal endothelial proliferation was suppressed, a concomitant decrease in endothelial cell area confirmed the inhibition of vascular development, and a marked fall in plasma progesterone levels showed that luteal function was compromised. In situ hybridization was used to localize and quantify compensatory effects on the expression of angiogenic genes. VEGF messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression in luteal cells was increased, whereas expression of its receptor, Flt, was decreased. Inhibition of VEGF resulted in localized increased expression of angiopoietin-2 mRNA and its receptor, Tie-2.

The results show that the VEGF trap can prevent luteal angiogenesis and inhibit the established process with resultant suppression of luteal function. Luteal Flt mRNA expression is dependent upon VEGF, and VEGF inhibition results in abortive increases in expression of VEGF, angiopoietin-2, and Tie-2.

THE RAPID, CONTROLLED, and cyclical nature of angiogenesis in the female reproductive tract suggests that interference with this process should provide a novel approach to manipulation of reproductive function. Many factors involved in the regulation of angiogenesis have been identified, and the possibility of stimulating or inhibiting these paracrine control mechanisms is being addressed using current advances in the development of angiogenic and antiangiogenic compounds (1). It is anticipated that inhibition of angiogenesis will have application in reproductive medicine for the treatment of conditions such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2, 3), endometriosis (4, 5, 6), and ovarian cancer (7, 8).

As comparatively little is known about the effect of angiogenesis inhibitors on the ovary and uterus, there is an urgent need for relevant investigations to be performed in appropriate nonhuman primate models. We have shown that the primate corpus luteum may provide such a model. As in women (9), luteinization in the marmoset is followed by a period of intense angiogenesis (10), and the determination of endothelial cell proliferation after antiangiogenic treatment in vivo is a sensitive index of inhibitory activity (11).

One of the most promising targets for inhibiting angiogenesis is to prevent the action of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). In this study we describe the inhibition of VEGF with a soluble truncated form of the Flt receptor, Flt-1-Fc (VEGF trapA40), which has been developed with a view to clinical application. VEGF trapA40 has a high affinity for all forms of endogenous VEGF preventing receptor binding. In the current study we examined the effects of VEGF trap at two different stages of the luteal phase; first by treatment immediately after ovulation to determine its ability to prevent the onset of angiogenesis, and second by administration on the third day after ovulation to investigate its ability to intervene with the established angiogenic process and luteal function. In addition, to gain insight into the paracrine regulation of luteal angiogenesis we investigated the changes in expression patterns of VEGF and its Flt receptor after treatment using quantitative in situ hybridization. We also examined the effects of VEGF deprivation on the expression of a second growth factor family specific for the vascular endothelium (12, 13, 14), the angiopoietins, which are believed to have an important function in ovarian angiogenesis (15, 16). Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), acting via its receptor Tie-2, is believed to destabilize endothelial cell contacts, which may, in turn, facilitate responsiveness to angiogenic factors such as VEGF.

Materials and Methods

Flt-1-Fc (VEGF trapA40)

The Flt-1-Fc (VEGF trapA40) used in these experiments comprised a portion of the extracellular domain of Flt-1 containing Ig repeats 1–3, fused to the Fc portion of human IgG. The Flt-1-Fc was expressed in CHO cells, and the protein was purified by protein A affinity chromatography, followed by size-exclusion chromatography. The recombinant Flt-1-Fc was then chemically modified to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of the parent molecule without affecting its ability to bind VEGF with high affinity. CHO-derived parental Flt(1–3Ig)Fc was incubated with sulfo-NHS-acetate (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) in PBS/5% glycerol, pH 7.2, such that the acetylation reagent was present in a 40-fold molar excess. The acetylation reaction specifically modifies the {epsilon}-amino group of lysines present in the parental molecule. The mixture was placed on a rocker and incubated overnight at room temperature. The acetate-modified Flt(1–3Ig)Fc, termed FltFc A40, was then extensively dialyzed against PBS/5% glycerol using 25-kDa molecular mass cut-off tubing. After dialysis, the concentration was checked by optical density at 280 nm, and modification was assessed by isoelectric focusing analysis. With this modification the pI shifts from about 9.5 for parental FLT(1–3Ig)Fc to 5.8–6.5 for FltFc A40. A variety of in vitro assays revealed no measurable decrease in binding affinity for the modified protein. The purity of the modified recombinant protein was judged to be more than 95% by Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE. The protein was filter-sterilized and stored at a concentration of 4.9 mg/mL in PBS, pH 7.2, containing 5% glycerol at -20 C.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Levels of circulating unbound VEGF trapA40 in plasma were assessed in the blood sample collected when the marmosets were killed 24 h after the final injection in animals receiving the 3-day treatment. VEGF trapA40 was measured using a functional ELISA. ELISA plates were coated with 2 µg/mL CHO-derived human VEGF 165 in carbonate/bicarbonate buffer overnight at 4 C. Plates were washed in KPL buffer (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD) and blocked with 0.2% I-block (Tropix, Perkin-Elmer Corp. PE Applied Biosystems, Bedford, MA) for 1 h. Standards and serial dilutions of serum samples were prepared in Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories diluent and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Plates were washed and incubated with goat antihuman Fc bound to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The substrate used was 3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl benzidine (Sigma), which was developed at room temperature for 30 min and stopped with 2 mol/L H2SO4. Plates were read at 450/579 nm. The detection limit of the assay was 150 pg/mL. The value for the bound VEGF trapA40/VEGF cocomplex was obtained using the following variation to the above ELISA: plates were coated with polyclonal anti-VEGF antibody (R & D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) as a capture antibody rather than coating with VEGF protein.

Animals and treatment

Adult female common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) with a body weight of approximately 350 g and regular ovulatory cycles were housed together with a younger sister or prepubertal female as described previously (17). Blood samples were collected three times per week by femoral venipuncture without anesthesia, and plasma was stored at -20 C until subjected to progesterone assay to confirm normal ovulatory cycles.

Experiments were carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. To synchronize the timing of ovulation, animals were treated with 1 µg PGF2{alpha} analog (cloprostenol, Planate, Coopers Animal Health Ltd., Crewe, UK), im, during the mid- to late luteal phase of the pretreatment cycle to induce luteolysis. This treatment is normally followed by ovulation 10 days later (18).

In the first experiment (prevention regimen), four marmosets were treated with VEGF trap at a dose of 25 mg/kg; approximately 1 mL was injected at two sc sites over the abdominal region. Four controls were treated with vehicle alone. Treatment commenced on the day of presumed ovulation (luteal day 0) and was repeated on days 1 and 2. When results showed that the treatment was effective in preventing angiogenesis and plasma concentrations of VEGF trap were high 24 h after injection, a second experiment was designed to investigate whether the on-going early luteal angiogenesis could be inhibited. Four animals were treated with VEGF trap on day 3 of luteal phase (intervention regimen). As pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the VEGF trap is released from the sc site over a period of several hours, VEGF trap was administered iv at a dose of 12.5 mg/kg to ensure maximal bioavailability during the 24-h study period in this experiment. Four controls were similarly treated with vehicle alone.

Twenty-four hours after the last treatment, the animals were injected iv with 20 mg bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Essex, UK) in saline. One hour later, the animals were sedated using 100 µL ketamine hydrochloride (Parke-Davis Veterinary, Pontypool, UK) im and killed with an iv injection of 400 µL Euthetal (sodium pentobarbitone, Rhone Merieux, Harlow, UK). After cardiac exsanguination via a heparinized syringe, ovaries were removed immediately, weighed, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. After 24 h, the ovaries were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Five-micron sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for morphological evaluation.

Progesterone assay

The occurrence of ovulation and a normal luteal phase length (18–22 days) were based on determination of plasma progesterone concentrations measured directly using an ELISA that is a modification of an assay we have used previously (19). The label was prepared by biotinylation of progesterone-11{alpha}-glucuronide, and the primary antibody was rabbit antiprogesterone BSA, whose cross-reaction with pregnenolone and other major steroids was less than 0.1%. Microtiter plates were coated with purified donkey antirabbit Ig. After washing, samples and standards were added along with anilino-1-naphthalene sulfonic acid and incubated for an additional 3 h. After washing, streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase was added in 1% casein and incubated for 1 h. Following a subsequent wash, color was developed using o-phenylene diamine. The detection limit of the assay was 4.6 nmol/L, and interassay coefficients of variation for low, medium, and high level quality controls were 11.6%, 7.0%, and 12.6%, respectively.

Immunocytochemistry

Cellular responses were studied by 1) quantifying the number of mitotic cells stained for BrdU, 2) examining the establishment of the microvascular network using CD31 staining to identify endothelial cells, and 3) determining the incidence of colocalization of BrdU and CD31.

Tissue sections (5 µm) were cut onto Tepsa-coated (Sigma) slides for immunocytochemistry. Sections were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated in descending concentrations of ethanol, and washed in distilled water. Antigen retrieval was performed by boiling sections in a Tefal Clypso pressure cooker (Tefal, Essex, UK) in 0.01 mol/L citrate buffer, pH 6, for 6 min at high pressure setting 2. Slides were then left for 20 min in hot buffer and washed in TBS (0.05 mol/L Tris and 9 g/L NaCl). To reduce nonspecific binding, sections were blocked in normal rabbit serum (diluted 1:5 in TBS) for 30 min. As primary antibodies CD31 (monoclonal, diluted 1:20 in TBS; DAKO Corp., Copenhagen, Denmark) or BrdU (monoclonal, diluted 1:30 in TBS; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) were used. Incubation was carried out overnight at 4 C. Slides were then washed three times in TBS. Incubation with the secondary antibody (rabbit antimouse Ig, DAKO Corp., 1:60 diluted in TBS) was for 40 min at room temperature followed after two washes in TBS by incubation of the alkaline phosphatase-antialkaline phosphatase complex (1:100 dilution in NRS and TBS; DAKO Corp.) for 40 min at room temperature. Visualization was performed using NBT solution containing 45 µL NBT substrate (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 10 mL NBT buffer, 35 µL 5-bromo 4 chloro 3 indolyl-phosphate (Boehringer, Lewes, East Sussex, UK) and 10 µL levamisole. Sections for BrdU were counterstained with hematoxylin, whereas sections for CD31 were not counterstained so that quantitative image analysis could be performed. For dual labeling, slides were incubated first with CD31 and visualized with Fast Red (Sigma), followed by incubation with BrdU and then visualized with NBT as described above. Fast Red solution contained 1 mg Fast Red/1 mL buffer (20 mg naphtol AS-MX phosphate, 2 mL dimethyl formamide, and 98 mL 0.1 mol/L Tris, pH 8.2).

In situ hybridization

To investigate effects of the 3-day treatment on the expression of related angiogenic factors, in situ hybridization was performed as described previously (16) using complementary ribonucleic acid (RNA) probes for human VEGF, Flt, Ang-2, and Tie-2. Sense and antisense probes were prepared using an RNA transcription kit (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX) and were labeled with [35S]uridine 5'-triphosphate (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA). Deparaffinized sections were treated with 0.1 N HCl and then digested in proteinase K (5 µg/mL; Sigma) for 30 min at 37 C. After prehybridization for 2 h at 50 C for VEGF and 55 C for Flt, Ang-1, Ang-2, and Tie-2, subsequent hybridization was performed in a moist chamber overnight at 50 or 55 C. High stringency posthybridization washings and ribonuclease A treatment were used to remove excess probe. Slides were then dehydrated, dried, and dipped in Ilford G5 liquid emulsion (H. A. West, Edinburgh, UK). Exposure times for VEGF, Flt, Ang-2, and Tie-2 were 2, 4, 7, and 7 weeks, respectively. Slides were subsequently developed (Kodak D19 developer, Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY) and fixed (Kodak GBS). All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin (Richard-Allan, Richland, MI), dehydrated, and mounted.

Analysis of data

Quantitative analysis for BrdU and CD31 immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization was performed using an image analysis system linked to an Olympus Corp. camera (New Hyde Park, NY), and the data were processed using the Image-Pro Plus (version 3.0) for Windows computer program.

BrdU labeling. A proliferation index (i.e. BrdU-positive cells expressed as a percentage of the total number of cells) was calculated for each corpus luteum. Ten randomly chosen fields (6 x 105 µm2) per corpus luteum at x200 magnification were analyzed. The proliferation index was expressed as a mean value for the number of fields assessed.

CD31 labeling. The endothelial cell area (i.e. CD31-positive cells) was measured in 10 randomly chosen fields (6 x 105 µm2) at x200 magnification in each corpus luteum. The captured gray scale image was thresholded and converted to a binary image, and the CD31 area was quantified. The CD31 area was expressed as a mean value for the number of fields assessed.

In situ hybridization. Slides were analyzed qualitatively under lightfield and quantitatively under darkfield conditions. Two parameters were used for quantification: grain density (number of grains per µm2) as a value for gene expression in the cells of interest and area of expression as a value for the proportion of messenger RNA (mRNA)-expressing cells. Grain density and total area of mRNA expression within 6–10 randomly selected fields (3.2 x 105 µm2) at x400 magnification were measured. The positive area of expression was calculated as the mean value for the number of fields assessed.

Statistical analysis

Effects of treatments were determined using a two-tailed unpaired t test, with a 95% confidence interval. Progesterone data were subjected to two-factor ANOVA, followed by post-hoc test. The tests were performed using SPSS software (version 6.1, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). All values are given as the mean ± SEM.

Results

Plasma levels of VEGF trapA40

Plasma samples taken 24 h after the third and final injection of VEGF trap in the prevention regimen contained high concentrations of the compound (25–61 µg/mL). Circulating cocomplexes comprising VEGF trap bound to VEGF also were detected in plasma, albeit at much lower levels (4.0–26.5 ng/mL), indicating that more than 99.9% of the circulating VEGF trap was unmodified and remained available for neutralization of endogenous VEGF.

Ovarian weight and morphology

Prevention regimen. Total ovarian weights in the 3-day VEGF trap-treated group (n = 4) were significantly less (P = 0.011) than those in controls (n = 4; 116 ± 20 and 255 ± 87 mg, respectively). By gross inspection, corpora lutea in ovaries of treated animals exhibited reduced hyperemia. Examination of sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin revealed the presence of fresh corpora lutea in all animals. The lutein cells of controls were uniformly fully differentiated and polyhedral in shape, with abundant cytoplasm and centrally located nucleus. In contrast, the appearance of lutein cells in treated animals differed from one another depending on localization in the corpus luteum. The cytoplasmic volume of lutein cells proximal to the luteal cavity was noticeably restricted compared with that of control tissue (Fig. 1Go, A and B). In corpora lutea of treated animals, nuclear fragments were observed primarily within the central area of the corpus luteum, whereas none was observed in the control corpora lutea (Fig. 1Go, C and D).



View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained section of a control (A and C) corpus luteum and a corpus luteum of an animal receiving VEGF trap for 3 days (B and D). Note the difference in cell shape between the peripheral zone (P) and the central zone (C) in VEGF trap-treated animals. A higher magnification of the control section is seen in Fig. 2CGo. In comparison, after VEGF trap treatment (D) an increase in nuclear fragments was observed (arrows). Bars, 100 µm (A and B) or 50 µm (C and D).

 
Intervention regimen. Total ovarian weights after a single injection of VEGF trap were not significantly different from the control values (182 ± 20 and 212 ± 43 mg, respectively). No morphological differences between the 1-day VEGF trap-treated animals and their controls were apparent.

Progesterone

In the control animals of both treatment regimens, the plasma progesterone concentration rose significantly during the study period (P < 0.001). No increase was recorded in the 3-day treated animals (Fig. 2Go); whereas there was no difference in progesterone concentrations between control and treatment groups at the onset of treatment, there was a significant difference between control and treatment groups by day 2, resulting from the rise in progesterone in the controls. The significance of this increase was enhanced on day 3. In the animals treated on luteal day 3, progesterone levels rose similarly to those in control animals from days 0–3 of the luteal phase. After the single injection of VEGF trap, progesterone levels declined significantly (P < 0.001; Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Plasma progesterone concentrations in control ({circ}) and 3-day VEGF trap-treated marmosets (•). Treatment started on the day of expected ovulation (day 0) and continued for 3 days. Treatment was associated with a significant suppression beginning on day 2 and enhanced on day 3 (P = 0.001).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Plasma progesterone concentrations in control ({circ}) and 1-day VEGF trap-treated animals (•). A single injection was administered on day 3 of the luteal phase. Before treatment the progesterone levels in the treatment group were increasing normally, whereas after injection progesterone levels fell significantly on day 4 compared with control values.

 
BrdU incorporation

Cell proliferation, as shown by BrdU staining, was present in all corpora lutea, with positive staining restricted largely to cells surrounding the lumen of microvessels, and others whose appearance was consistent with that of capillary endothelial cells. However, although endothelial cell proliferation was clearly high within the corpora lutea from all control marmosets, it was markedly reduced by the 3-day VEGF trap treatment (Fig. 4Go, A and B) and after a single injection of VEGF trap on day 3, as evidenced by a significant decrease in the proliferation index in both experiments (Figs. 4GGo and 5AGo).



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Immunocytochemistry results for BrdU and CD31 in corpora lutea from 3-day VEGF trap-treated animals. A, The high proliferation of endothelial cells (black nuclei) during the early luteal phase in a control corpus luteum. Note the marked reduction after treatment (B). C, CD31 immunostaining in a control corpus luteum. Contrast the well developed microvasculature with the sparse arrangement after treatment (D). E and F, CD31/BrdU double labeling in a control (E) and treated (F) corpora lutea indicates that BrdU- positive nuclei are mostly of endothelial cell origin. Bars, 100 µm (A–D), 50 µm (E and F). G, Quantification of BrdU immunocytochemistry. The proliferation index in corpora lutea from early luteal phase control ({square}) and VEGF trap-treated ({blacksquare}) marmoset corpus luteum. H, Quantitative analysis of CD31 immunostaining in control ({square}) and treated ({blacksquare}). Different letters indicate significant differences.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Quantification of BrdU (A) and CD31 (B) immunostaining in controls ({square}) and after a single VEGF trap injection ({blacksquare}). Different letters indicate significant differences.

 
Endothelial cell area

CD31 immunostaining demonstrated the development of a microvasculature in all corpora lutea. However, the endothelial cell area was markedly reduced in the corpora lutea of 3-day VEGF trap-treated animals (Fig. 4Go, C and D). Larger vessels in the peripheral zone of the former theca were relatively unaffected compared with the internal microvasculature. The 3-day treatment reduced endothelial cell area by approximately 75% (Fig. 4HGo), whereas after a single injection the endothelial cell area was reduced by 44% (Fig. 5BGo).

Colocalization of BrdU and CD31

The BrdU-positive cells in corpora lutea of both control groups were almost always dually stained. In the treated group, the proliferating cells present were almost entirely of endothelial cell origin (Fig. 4Go, E and F).

In situ hybridization

VEGF mRNA was highly expressed in all recently formed corpora lutea in both control and treated animals (Fig. 6Go, A and B); expression was confined to the lutein cells. Analysis of grain distribution and density revealed that the total area of VEGF expression per field was not significantly different between the groups, but in VEGF trap-treated marmosets the grain density was significantly increased (Fig. 6Go, C and D), indicating that the gene expression for VEGF was increased after treatment.



View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. In situ hybridization for VEGF mRNA in corpora lutea of a control (A) and a 3-day VEGF trap-treated animal (B). Note the abundant expression of VEGF throughout the corpus luteum. Blood vessels (BV) are negative. A, Regions of the former antrum. Bar, 50 µm. C and D, Quantitative analysis of in situ hybridization for VEGF mRNA are shown for the area of expression (C) and for the grain density (D). Different letters indicate significant differences.

 
The Flt receptor mRNA was exclusively localized in endothelial cells of the microvasculature of the corpus luteum with an apparent decrease after treatment (Fig. 7Go, A and B). Quantification revealed that the area of expression significantly decreased after VEGF trap treatment (Fig. 7CGo), corresponding to the decrease in the number of endothelial cells in the corpus luteum. The grain density per cell was also decreased in the corpus luteum of VEGF trap-treated animals (Fig. 7DGo), indicating a switching off of the Flt gene.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. In situ hybridization for the Flt receptor mRNA in a control (A) and a 3-day VEGF trap-treated corpora lutea (B). Flt was expressed in endothelial cells (arrows in inset; L, lutein cell). Compared with that in controls, a decrease in Flt expression was found after VEGF trap treatment. Bar, 50 µm. Quantification of Flt in situ hybridization in controls ({square}) and treated animals ({blacksquare}) of the area of expression (C) as well as grain density (D) revealed a significant decrease after treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences.

 
Ang-2 was expressed at a very low level in single endothelial and lutein cells within the control corpora lutea. After VEGF trap treatment, a unique pattern of increased Ang-2 expression in luteal cells of the central region was observed (Fig. 8Go, A and B). Consistently, the area of mRNA expression was significantly higher in treated animals than in the controls (Fig. 8CGo). A tendency toward an increase in grain density after treatment was not significant because of high variation in the control group (Fig. 8DGo).



View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. In situ hybridization for Ang-2 mRNA in a control (A) and a 3-day VEGF trap-treated corpora lutea (B). Ang-2 was expressed in single cells (arrows) in controls. After treatment, an increase in cells expressing Ang-2 was visible. Bar, 50 µm. C, Quantification of the area of expression revealed a significant increase after treatment. D, Quantification of Ang-2 grain density. Different letters indicate significant differences.

 
Tie-2 expression was low and occurred exclusively in endothelial cells (Fig. 9Go, A and B). In contrast to Flt expression, Tie-2 mRNA was expressed in larger capillaries, whereas in the microvasculature expression was very low (Fig. 9AGo). No differences in the area of expression were found between treated and control animals (Fig. 9CGo), but after treatment a significant increase in grain density was observed (Fig. 9DGo), indicating increased gene expression.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. In situ hybridization for Tie-2 mRNA in a control (A) and a 3-day VEGF trap-treated corpora lutea (B). Tie-2 expression was found in endothelial cells (inset, black arrows; BV, blood vessels). Tie-2 expression (white arrows) was low in controls. Note the increase in grain density after treatment. Bar, 50 µm. C, Quantification of the area of Tie-2 expression in controls ({square}) and treated animals ({blacksquare}). D, Measurements of the grain density revealed a significant increase after treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences.

 
Discussion

This study shows that treatment of marmosets with a soluble form of the Flt receptor (VEGF trap) to neutralize the actions of VEGF had a dramatic inhibitory effect on early luteal angiogenesis. Treatment starting on the day of ovulation prevented the onset of the angiogenic process, as demonstrated by the marked decline in endothelial cell proliferation and the dearth of the microvascular tree on luteal day 3. Furthermore, by allowing angiogenesis to become established and delaying treatment until luteal day 3, we found that a single treatment with VEGF trap for 24 h can inhibit ongoing angiogenesis. Both treatments resulted in inhibitory effects upon luteal function, as demonstrated by the rapid decline in plasma progesterone, and the 3-day treatment was found to have altered the expression of VEGF, Flt, Ang-2, and Tie-2 within the corpus luteum. These findings suggest that anti-VEGF therapy may have potential for clinical application in ovarian disorders characterized by hypervascularity and hyperplasia.

The present results confirm and extend our previous observations using a mouse monoclonal antibody to VEGF to prevent the onset of angiogenesis in this model (11). Comparison of the results of the two treatments reveals that the VEGF trap produced more profound effects, resulting in a greater suppression of ovarian weight, endothelial cell proliferation, and endothelial cell area. This indicates that VEGF trap is a more effective way of VEGF inhibition than use of a VEGF antibody; however, full dose-response studies would be required to establish this observation.

The success of a single injection of VEGF trap on luteal day 3 in disrupting the ongoing angiogenic process confirms the importance of VEGF in luteal angiogenesis. However, the suppression of progesterone levels at this stage was somewhat surprising. It might have been expected that the suppression of angiogenesis at this point when a proportion of the luteal vasculature is established would be associated with a prevention of the normal increase in plasma progesterone rather than a decrease. Rapid actions of VEGF are attributable to its effects on permeability (20, 21), so this decline in progesterone may indicate that inhibition of VEGF results in a suppression of ovarian vascular permeability with consequent effects on the availability of hormone precursors and gonadotropins, thereby contributing to reduced progesterone synthesis. The reduction in progesterone secretion after the longer term treatment is probably the result of additional mechanisms relating to impairment of vascular development, including reduced delivery of essential cellular requirements, reduced removal of synthesized progesterone secondary to the vascular impairment, or reduced synthesis of progesterone as a result of incomplete differentiation of lutein cells.

A low level of angiogenesis persisted despite the treatment with VEGF trap from ovulation to day 3 of the luteal phase. It is unlikely that this was the result of incomplete inhibition of VEGF, because over 99% of the unbound VEGF trap remained available in the circulation after the final injection. It may be that the residual angiogenesis reflects the activity of other angiogenic factors. A first step to investigate secondary effects of VEGF inhibition on the expression of other angiogenic factors and their receptors was undertaken in the current study by the use of in situ hybridization on the ovaries of the marmosets receiving 3-day treatment. VEGF mRNA was localized to the hormone-producing cells of the corpus luteum, as observed in the human and cynomolgus monkey corpus luteum (16, 22); there was no expression apparent in endothelial cells. The grain density in the lutein cells was increased significantly in the VEGF trap-treated marmoset corpora lutea. This suggests that the lutein cells may attempt to compensate for reduced VEGF in the periphery by increasing its synthesis. As it has been shown that hypoxia stimulates VEGF synthesis in many tissues (23, 24, 25, 26), it reasonable to suggest that up-regulation of VEGF after treatment is at least in part driven by a hypoxic response within the corpus luteum resulting from the dearth of the vasculature. The VEGF receptor Flt was expressed in the luteal endothelium and a marked decrease in the area of expression was observed after treatment commensurate with the reduction in the number of microvessels. Furthermore, as the Flt mRNA grain density in endothelial cells also decreased after treatment with VEGF trap, this indicates that VEGF regulates its own receptor expression in the corpus luteum as observed in other tissues (27, 28, 29) and in the rat corpus luteum (30). It is also possible that the lack of the endothelial cell survival factor VEGF in the periphery causes a dysfunction of endothelial cells, followed by a decrease in Flt synthesis.

Little is known about the interplay between VEGF and the synthesis of the angiopoietins and their Tie-2 receptor. The current study provided an opportunity to begin to explore this question by examining the effects of deprivation of VEGF on luteal expression of Ang-2 and Tie-2 mRNA. After treatment, Ang-2 mRNA expression was increased, especially in regions proximal to the luteal cavity. Morphologically, this area was associated with a smaller lutein cell size than in controls, and an increase in nuclear fragments, indicating cell death, was observed, suggesting that this area is susceptible to the greatest hypoxia and nutrient deprivation. In addition, an increased expression of Tie-2 mRNA was detected after treatment. Up-regulation of Ang-2 and Tie-2 under hypoxic conditions has also been shown in a focal cerebral ischemia model in the rat (31) and in human endometrial endothelial cells (32). Thus, hypoxia may also drive up-regulation of Ang-2 in the corpus luteum after VEGF trap treatment. Other studies have shown that areas of punctuate Ang-2 expression in combination with VEGF expression are associated with active angiogenesis (16, 33). Therefore, it may be suggested that the increased mRNA for both Ang-2 and its receptor, Tie-2, together with elevated levels of VEGF expression are an attempt to attract capillary ingrowth into this presumably hypoxic area. An alternative explanation of increased Ang-2 mRNA expression is that Ang-2 may be required during angiolysis, as Ang-2 causes vascular regression in the absence of growth and survival signals such as VEGF (15, 34).

Finally, turning to the clinical relevance of our observations with respect to the reproductive system, the ability of VEGF trap to prevent the development of the luteal microvasculature, reduce ovarian weight, and rapidly suppress luteal function strongly suggests that both ovarian angiogenesis and permeability are targets for VEGF inhibition. This suggests that that at least two ovarian disorders, the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and ovarian cancer, both of which are associated with pathological angiogenesis, hypervascularity, and hyperpermeability, may be responsive to VEGF inhibition with VEGF trap.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. D. S. Charnock-Jones (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK) for the gift of complementary DNA probes for VEGF and Flt, K. Morris and staff for animal care, F. Pitt and I. Swanston for progesterone assays, Dr. N. Papadopoulos for preparation of the chemically modified version of the VEGF trapA40, and D. Hylton for assistance with the ELISA.

Footnotes

1 This work was supported in part by a grant (to C.W.) from Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft. Back

Received December 15, 2000.

Revised March 1, 2001.

Accepted March 15, 2001.

References

  1. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. 2000 Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 407:249–257.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Levin ER, Rosen GF, Cassidenti DL, et al. 1998 Role of vascular endothelial cell growth factor in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Clin Invest. 102:1978–1984.[Medline]
  3. Fraser HM, Lunn SF. 2000 Angiogenesis and its control in the female reproductive system. Br Med Bull. 56:787–797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Darcha C, Dechelotte P, Pouly JL, Bruhat MA. 1998 Angiogenesis in endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 46:111–115.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Oosterlynck DJ, Meuleman C, Sobis H, Vandeputte M, Koninckx PR. 1993 Angiogenic activity of peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 59:778–782.[Medline]
  6. Fujimoto J, Sakaguchi H, Hirose R, Wen H, Tamaya T. 1999 Angiogenesis in endometriosis and angiogenic factors. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 48:14–20.
  7. Mesiano S, Ferrara N, Jaffe RB. 1998 Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian cancer: inhibition of ascites formation by immunoneutralization. Am J Pathol. 153:1249–1256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Presta LG, Chen H, O’Connor SJ, et al. 1997 Humanization of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody for the therapy of solid tumors and other disorders. Cancer Res. 57:4593–4599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rodger FE, Young FM, Fraser HM, Illingworth PJ. 1997 Endothelial cell proliferation follows the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone surge, but not human chorionic gonadotrophin rescue, in the human corpus luteum. Hum Reprod. 12:1723–1729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dickson SE, Fraser HM. 2000 Inhibition of early luteal angiogenesis by gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment in the primate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:2339–2344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Fraser HM, Dickson SE, Lunn SF, et al. 2000 Suppression of luteal angiogenesis in the primate by neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocrinology. 141:995–1000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Davis S, Aldrich TH, Jones PF, et al. 1996 Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell. 87:1161–1169.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Suri C, McClain J, Thurston G, et al. 1998 Increased vascularization in mice overexpressing angiopoietin-1. Science. 282:468–471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Valenzuela DM, Griffiths JA, Rojas J, et al. 1999 Angiopoietins 3 and 4: diverging gene counterparts in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1904–1909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, et al. 1997 Angiopoietein-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science. 277:55–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wulff C, Wilson H, Largue P, Duncan WC, Armstrong DG, Fraser HM. 2000 Angiogenesis in the human corpus luteum: Localization and changes in angiopoietins, Tie-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:4302–4309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fraser HM, Dickson SE, Morris KD, Erickson GF, Lunn SF. 1999 The effects of the angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 on luteal establishment and function in the primate. Hum Reprod. 14:2054–2060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Summers PM, Wennink J, Hodges JK. 1985 Cloprostenol-induced luteolysis in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). J Reprod Fertil. 73:133–138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Smith KB, Lunn SF, Fraser HM. 1990 Inhibin secretion during the ovulatory cycle and pregnancy in the common marmoset monkey. J Endocrinol. 126:489–495.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Dvorak HF, Brown LF, Detmar M, Dvorak AM. 1995 Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 146:1029–1039.[Abstract]
  21. Dvorak HF, Nagy JA, Feng D, Brown LF, Dvorak AM. 1999 Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor and the significance of microvascular hyperpermeability in angiogenesis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 237:97–132.[Medline]
  22. Ravindranath N, Little-Ihrig L, Phillips HS, Ferrara N, Zeleznik AJ. 1992 Vascular endothelial growth factor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the primate ovary. Endocrinology. 131:254–260.[Abstract]
  23. Rossler J, Breit S, Havers W, Schweigerer L. 1999 Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human neuroblastoma: up-regulation by hypoxia. Int J Cancer. 81:113–117.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Popovici RM, Irwin JC, Giaccia AJ, Giudice LC. 1999 Hypoxia and cAMP stimulate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in human endometrial stromal cells: potential relevance to menstruation and endometrial regeneration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:2245–2248.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ahmed A, Dunk C, Ahmed S, Khaliq A. 2000 Regulation of placental vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and placenta growth factor (PlGF) and soluble Flt-1 by oxygen – a review. Placenta. 21(Suppl A):16–24.
  26. Neeman M, Abramowitch R, Schiffenbauer YS, Tempel C. 1997 Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxic stress: from solid tumours to the ovarian follicle. Int J Exp Pathol. 78:57–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Sato Y, Kanno S, Oda N, et al. 2000 Properties of two VEGF receptors, Flt-1 and KDR, in signal transduction. Ann NY Acad Sci. 902:201–207.[Medline]
  28. Barleon B, Siemeister G, Martiny-Baron G, Weindel K, Herzog C, Marme D. 1997 Vascular endothelial growth factor up-regulates its receptor fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT-1) and a soluble variant of FLT-1 in human vascular endothelial cells. Cancer Res. 57:5421–5425.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Shen BQ, Lee DY, Gerber HP, Keyt BA, Ferrara N, Zioncheck TF. 1998 Homologous up-regulation of KDR/Flk-1 receptor expression by vascular endothelial growth factor in vitro. J Biol Chem. 237:29979–29978.
  30. Ferrara N, Chen H, Davis-Smyth T, et al. 1998 Vascular endothelial growth factor is essential for corpus luteum angiogenesis. Nat Med. 4:336–340.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Lin TN, Wang CK, Cheung WM, Hsu CY. 2000 Induction of angiopoietin and Tie receptor mRNA expression after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 20:387–395.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Krikun G, Schaty F, Finlay T, et al. 2000 Expression of angiopoietin-2 by human endometrial endothelial cells: regulation by hypoxia and inflammation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 18:159–163.
  33. Wiegand SJ, Boland P, Yancopoulos GD. 2000 Cooperative roles for the angiopoietins and vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian angiogenesis. In: Adashi EY, ed. Ovulation: evolving scientific and clinical concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag; 175–186.
  34. Hanahan D. 1997 Signaling vascular morphogenesis and maintenance. Science. 277:48–50.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wulff, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wulff, C.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals