| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Articles |
Endocrine-Genetics Unit/LIM 25, Department of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine (R.G.G., C.Y.H., N.A., S.P.A.T.), 01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil; Division of Endocrinology, Federal University of Sergipe (M.H.A.-O., A.H.O.S., R.M.C.P., N.L.S.), 49060-100 Aracajo Sergipe, Brazil; Division of Endocrinology, Departments of Medicine (M.A.L., R.S.) and Pediatrics (M.A.L.), and the Ilyssa Center for Molecular Endocrinology (M.A.L., R.S.), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287; and Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Tulane University, School of Medicine, Endocrine Section (C.Y.B.), New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Rogério G. Gondo, Endocrine-Genetics Unit/LIM 25, Sao Paulo University School of Medicine, Avenue Dr. Arnaldo, 455/5th Floor, 01246903 Sao Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: gondo_rog{at}hotmail.com
Abstract
GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic peptides that bind to specific receptors and thereby stimulate the secretion of pituitary GH. In vivo it is uncertain whether these peptides act directly on somatotroph cells or indirectly via release of GHRH from the hypothalamus. In this study we compared the pituitary hormone response to GHRP-2 in 11 individuals with isolated GH deficiency (GHD) due to a homozygous mutation of the GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) gene and in 8 normal unrelated controls.
Basal serum GH levels were lower in the GHD group compared with controls [0.11 ± 0.11 (range, <0.04 to 0.38) vs. 0.59 ± 0.76 µg/L (range, 0.042.12 µg/L); P = 0.052]. After GHRP-2 administration there was a 4.5-fold increase in serum GH relative to baseline values in the GHD group (0.49 ± 0.41 vs. 0.11 ± 0.11 µg/L; P = 0.002), which was significantly less than the 79-fold increase in the control group (46.8 ± 17.6 vs. 0.59 ± 0.76 µg/L; P = 0.008). Basal and post-GHRP-2 serum levels of ACTH, cortisol, and PRL were similar in both groups. Basal levels of serum TSH were significantly higher in the GHD group than in the control group (3.23 ± 2.21 vs. 1.37 ± 0.34 µIU/mL; P = 0.003). TSH levels in both groups did not change after GHRP-2 administration.
These results suggest that an intact GHRH signaling system is not an absolute requirement for GHRP-2 action on GH secretion and that GHRP-2 has a GHRH-independent effect on pituitary somatotroph cells.
GH SECRETAGOGUES (GHSs) are synthetic compounds that stimulate GH secretion in vitro and in vivo (1). They include peptide molecules [GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)], such as ipamorelin (2); ep51 16; GHRP-1, -2, and -6 (hexarelin) (3); and Tyr-Ala-hexarelin (4), as well as nonpeptide compounds, such as MK0677 and L-692,585 (5). GHSs also stimulate ACTH/cortisol and PRL release (6, 7, 8) and have been shown to modulate food intake, sleep, and cardiac tone (9, 10, 11).
Despite the broad range of substances, all GHSs seem to act through a specific cell membrane receptor, identified, among other tissues, in both the pituitary and the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (12). Recently, an endogenous ligand to GHS receptor, termed Ghrelin, has been isolated from rat stomach and hypothalamus as well as human stomach, indicating that GHSs may exist naturally (13).
In vitro, GHSs directly stimulate GH secretion from the pituitary somatotroph cells, as well as indirectly, by acting upon the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus to release GHRH into the portal hypophyseal circulation (14, 15). It is not clear which of these two mechanisms is more important in vivo as the basis of the stimulatory effect of GHS on GH secretion. There is some indirect evidence that GHSs act mainly on the hypothalamus, with a marginal direct effect on the pituitary (16).
To test whether GH release by GHSs requires the presence of an intact GHRH pathway, we studied the acute GH response to GHRP-2, a potent GHS, in individuals with GH deficiency (GHD) caused by a homozygous inactivating mutation of the GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) gene (17, 18, 19).
Subjects and Methods
Peptide
GHRP-2, KP-10-2, was synthesized by Kaken Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan), and prepared for human usage under the supervision of one of the authors (C.Y.B).
Study design
Eleven individuals with isolated GHD from Itabaianinha, Brazil,
who are homozygous for a splicing mutation in the GHRH-R gene
(17, 18, 19, 20), and eight healthy volunteers (controls) from
Aracaju (118 km from Itabaianinha) were studied. Four of the GHD group
(subjects 1, 2, 3, and 6) had received GH therapy for 1 yr until 2 yr
before this study. None of the study subjects was taking any drug at
the time of the study. Sex, age, and anthropometric measurements are
presented in Table 1
. SD
scores of height were calculated based on growth charts published by
WHO (21). The body mass index (was calculated as weight
(kilograms)/height (meters) squared. The body mass index percentile for
height age was derived from published charts (22, 23).
|
GHRP-2 stimulation tests were started between 08000900 h after an overnight fast. An indwelling catheter was introduced into an antecubital vein and was kept patent by heparinized saline solution. GHRP-2 (2 µg/kg BW) was administered iv as a bolus. Blood samples were collected 15 min before, immediately before (time zero), and 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after the injection. Serum and plasma were separated immediately and stored at -20 C until hormone assays were performed.
Assays
Each hormone assay was performed in duplicate using kits from the same lot. GH, TSH, and ACTH were measured by an immunoradiometric assay (Cis-Biointernational, Saclay, France). The detection limit for GH was 0.04 µg/L, with an intraassay variation of 2.32.8%; the detection limit for TSH was 0.02 µIU/mL, with an intraassay variation of 2.93.5%; and that for ACTH was 0.44 pg/mL, with an intraassay variation of 10.414.8%. PRL and cortisol were determined by RIA (CIS-Bio International), with detection limits of 0.004 and 4.6 nmol/L, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Basal hormone concentrations were calculated as the mean of the -15 and 0 min concentrations. The Mann-Whitney rank-sum test was used to compare the hormone levels obtained from control and GHD groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare basal and GHRP-2-stimulated hormone levels. All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assumed at P < 0.05.
Results
As shown in Table 1
, subjects with GHD had detectable basal serum
GH levels, which were lower (although statistically not significant,
with P = 0.052) than GH levels of normal control
subjects. The peak serum GH after GHRP-2 in the GHD group was
significantly lower than that in the control group. There was, however,
a significant GH increase in both groups after GHRP-2: a 4.5-fold
increase over the basal values in the GHD group, and a 79-fold increase
in the control group (Fig. 1
).
|
Basal ACTH serum levels were not significantly different between the two groups (3.82 ± 4.06 pg/mL for GHD vs. 1.60 ± 0.88 pg/mL for controls; P = 0.17). ACTH increased after GHRP-2 treatment in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between the peak responses.
GHRP-2 elicited significant and similar increases in PRL levels in both
groups (Table 1
).
Finally, in the GHD group, basal TSH (3.23 ± 2.21 µIU/mL)
was higher than that in the control group (1.37 ± 0.34 µIU/mL;
P = 0.003) (Fig. 2
). The two GHD subjects with TSH
levels out of the normal range (no. 3 and 6) had negative thyroid
peroxidase and thyroglobulin autoantibodies, as tested by an
immunofluorometric assay. These subjects were considered to have
subclinical hypothyroidism based on normal free
T4 levels. No thyroid hormone replacement therapy
was instituted. The difference in serum TSH between the two groups
remained significant even when these two subjects were removed from the
statistical calculations. There was no increase in serum TSH levels
after GHRP-2 treatment.
|
The predominant site of action of GHSs on GH secretion has not been established. As receptors for GHSs have been identified in both pituitary and hypothalamus (24, 25, 26), it is possible that GHSs act at either or both sites. GH synthesis and secretion are primarily regulated by the hypothalamic hormones, GHRH and somatostatin, as well as by the negative feedback of insulin-like growth factor I (27). GHRH is necessary for normal somatotroph cell proliferation and for the synthesis and secretion of GH (28). GHRH acts on somatotroph cells via a specific seven-transmembrane domain, G protein-coupled receptor, the activation of which causes an increase in intracellular cAMP and activation of the protein kinase A pathway (28). By contrast, GHSs act on a receptor that is coupled via members of the Gq/i family to activation of phospholipase C (1). Inactivating mutations of the GHRH-R gene have been recently described by us and others (17, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33) and represent an interesting model to test whether GHSs require an intact GHRH pathway for their action on GH secretion. For this reason, we tested the response of pituitary hormones to acute administration of GHR-2 in a genetically homogeneous group of individuals with GHD secondary to a homozygous inactivating mutation of the GHRH-R gene. This mutation affects the splice donor site at the beginning of intron 1 of the GHRH-R gene and predicts the production of a severely truncated GHRH-R protein or no protein at all (17). The complete absence of functional GHRH-R in these patients is confirmed by the absolute lack of increase in serum GH after both acute (1 µg/kg BW GHRH, iv bolus) and chronic GHRH (acute GHRH test after 6 nights of 5 µg/kg BW GHRH, sc) stimulation (17).
The presence of a small, but significant (4.5-fold), GH rise
after GHRP-2 administration in these patients supports the hypothesis
that an intact GHRH signaling system may not be an absolute requirement
for GH secretion. The finding of a relatively low GH response to GHRP-2
is probably due to pituitary somatotroph hypoplasia, which is well
documented in the little mouse, a naturally occurring murine model of
GHRH-R mutation (34, 35, 36) that also has a low content of GH
secretory granules per cell (34). Somatotroph cell
hypoplasia to date has not been documented histologically in human
subjects homozygous for GHRH-R mutations; however, small pituitary
dimensions were observed by magnetic resonance imaging in our patients
with the IVS1 + 1 G
A mutation of the GHRH-R gene (unpublished data)
as well in patients with the Glu72Stop mutation
(30, 37).
Our findings conflict with the previous work of Maheshwari et al. (38), who showed a complete lack of GH response to GHRP-6 (2 µg/kg) in individuals with a different inactivating GHRH-R gene mutation (Glu72Stop; peak GH, <1 µg/L). The GH assay method used in that study, however, had limited sensitivity (0.35 vs. 0.04 µg/L in our assay), possibly explaining such a difference. The higher biological potency of GHRP-2 compared with that of GHRP-6 (39) and the different kinds of mutation could also explain the different findings of these studies.
Potential diagnostic and therapeutic uses of GHRP-2 have been recently discussed (40). It is conceivable that in our GHRH-R-deficient patients chronic exogenous administration of GHRP-2 or another GHS would lead to a more robust stimulation of GH release. ACTH, cortisol, and PRL responses to GHRP-2 stimuli in our cases were similar to those seen in our control volunteers, supporting the idea that an intact GHRH signaling system is not necessary for the GHS releasing effect on these hormones. Similar results were observed with GHRP-6 in individuals with the Glu72Stop mutation (38).
Our finding of normal, but higher than control, TSH has not been noticed in other similar GHRH-R-deficient cases (29, 30, 31, 32, 33). The reason for our finding is unknown, but the lack of difference in the hormonal response to GHRP-2 between subjects with increased TSH and the others indicates that if hypothyroidism is present, it is subclinical and of little consequence.
In conclusion, we found a small, but significant, GH response to acute GHRP-2 administration in GHD individuals with inactive GHRH-R. This observation and the current availability of orally absorbable nonpeptide GHS (41) present the possibility for a long-term trial with GHS in GHD patients with a mutated GHRH-R gene.
Acknowledgments
We thank Susimeire Gomes and Valéria Samuel Lando for technical assistance.
Footnotes
1 This work was supported in part by NIH-NCRR General Clinical
Research Center CAP Award 3-M01-RR-00005238S1 (to R.S.), a grant from
the Genentech Foundation for Growth and Development (R.S.), Grants
DK-34281 (to M.A.L.) and NCCR General Clinical Research Center
Grant 501-RR-00052 from the NIH, and CPDIA/NEC of Brazil. ![]()
2 CNPQ researcher (300.346/824). ![]()
Received November 15, 2000.
Revised February 27, 2001.
Accepted March 5, 2001.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Kineman and R. M. Luque Evidence that Ghrelin Is as Potent as Growth Hormone (GH)-Releasing Hormone (GHRH) in Releasing GH from Primary Pituitary Cell Cultures of a Nonhuman Primate (Papio anubis), Acting through Intracellular Signaling Pathways Distinct from GHRH Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4440 - 4449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Brabant GH releasing peptide 2 test: the holy grail of testing GH deficiency? Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 157(1): 29 - 30. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Farhy, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Model-projected mechanistic bases for sex differences in growth hormone regulation in humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2007; 292(4): R1577 - R1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Menezes Oliveira, C. Marques-Santos, J. A. Barreto-Filho, R. Ximenes Filho, A. V. de Oliveira Britto, A. H. Oliveira Souza, C. M. Prado, C. R. Pereira Oliveira, R. M. C. Pereira, T. de Almeida Ribeiro Vicente, et al. Lack of Evidence of Premature Atherosclerosis in Untreated Severe Isolated Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency due to a GH-Releasing Hormone Receptor Mutation J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2006; 91(6): 2093 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. S. Alcantara, R. Salvatori, P. R. S. Alcantara, L. M. A. Nobrega, V. S. Campos, E. C. O. Oliveira, M. H. S. Oliveira, A. H. O. Souza, and M. H. Aguiar-Oliveira Thyroid Morphology and Function in Adults with Untreated Isolated Growth Hormone Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alba, D. Fintini, C. Y. Bowers, A. F. Parlow, and R. Salvatori Effects of long-term treatment with growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 in the GHRH knockout mouse Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2005; 289(5): E762 - E767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Misra, K. K. Miller, K. Kuo, K. Griffin, V. Stewart, E. Hunter, D. B. Herzog, and A. Klibanski Secretory dynamics of ghrelin in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa and healthy adolescents Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, August 1, 2005; 289(2): E347 - E356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Le Tissier, D. F. Carmignac, S. Lilley, A. K. Sesay, C. J. Phelps, P. Houston, K. Mathers, C. Magoulas, D. Ogden, and I. C. A. F. Robinson Hypothalamic Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone (GHRH) Deficiency: Targeted Ablation of GHRH Neurons in Mice Using a Viral Ion Channel Transgene Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2005; 19(5): 1251 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. van der Lely, M. Tschop, M. L. Heiman, and E. Ghigo Biological, Physiological, Pathophysiological, and Pharmacological Aspects of Ghrelin Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 426 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Dimaraki, C. A. Jaffe, C. Y. Bowers, P. Marbach, and A. L. Barkan Pulsatile and nocturnal growth hormone secretions in men do not require periodic declines of somatostatin Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2003; 285(1): E163 - E170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Horvath, S. Diano, P. Sotonyi, M. Heiman, and M. Tschop Minireview: Ghrelin and the Regulation of Energy Balance--A Hypothalamic Perspective Endocrinology, October 1, 2001; 142(10): 4163 - 4169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Maheshwari, S. S. Pezzoli, A. Rahim, S. M. Shalet, M. O. Thorner, and G. Baumann Pulsatile growth hormone secretion persists in genetic growth hormone-releasing hormone resistance Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2002; 282(4): E943 - E951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |