help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welt, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welt, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. E.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 6 2531-2537
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Articles: Hormones and Reproductive Health

Differential Regulation of Inhibin A and Inhibin B by Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, and Stage of Follicle Development1

Corrine K. Welt, Zachary A. Smith, Donna K. Pauler and Janet E. Hall

Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Reproductive Endocrine Sciences Center, and National Center for Infertility Research, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Corrine K. Welt, Reproductive Endocrine Unit, BHX 511, Fruit Street, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.

Abstract

Inhibin B and inhibin A exhibit unique patterns of secretion across the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. To test the hypothesis that the distinct patterns of inhibin B and inhibin A secretion result from differential regulation by LH and FSH, a series of controlled experiments was designed to dissect the specific effects of LH and FSH at distinct stages of follicle development. After GnRH agonist desensitization, women with small antral follicles were treated with recombinant human LH (rhLH), rhFSH, or rhFSH and estradiol (E2). rhLH or rhFSH was also administered when follicles reached the preovulatory stage in gonadotropin-stimulated or spontaneous cycles.

At the small antral stage of development, rhFSH, but not rhLH, administration increased inhibin B (17.4 ± 4.6 to 321.0 ± 97.0 pg/mL; P < 0.05), inhibin A (0.6 ± 0.1 to 2.6 ± 0.6 IU/mL; P < 0.05), and E2 [15.8 ± 3.6 to 95.3 ± 26.9 pg/mL (58.0 ± 13.2 to 349.8 ± 98.7 pmol/L); P < 0.05]. The inhibin B increase preceded inhibin A by 48 h. Addition of E2 to FSH resulted in a greater increase in inhibin B (23.2 ± 6.4 to 865.2 ± 294.5 pg/mL; P < 0.05) than FSH alone (P < 0.05). At the preovulatory stage, rhLH administration increased inhibin A (15.9 ± 10.3 to 21.5 ± 13.7 IU/mL; P < 0.05) and E2 [669.4 ± 285.5 to 943.6 ± 388.1 pg/mL (2457.4 ± 1048.1 to 3464.0 ± 1424.7 pmol/L); P < 0.05], but not inhibin B, as did rhFSH administration in spontaneous cycles [E2: 226.4 ± 102.7 to 264.7 ± 121.0 pg/mL (831.1 ± 377.0 to 971.7 ± 444.2 pmol/L); P < 0.05; inhibin A: 2.6 ± 1.3 to 3.7 ± 1.9 IU/mL; P < 0.05; and inhibin B: 76.3 ± 32.2 to 77.6 ± 32.8 pg/mL; P = NS].

These findings suggest that increases in both FSH and E2 in the early follicular phase result in increased inhibin B secretion at early stages of follicle development, whereas the selective LH rise in the late follicular phase favors inhibin A secretion from more mature follicles. Thus, both differential secretion of LH and FSH and the stage of follicle development determine the patterns of inhibin A and inhibin B secretion in the normal menstrual cycle.

OVARIAN FOLLICLE growth is a complex process involving changes in gonadotropin responsiveness (1, 2). Although initiation of primordial follicle growth is largely FSH independent, recruitment of the cohort of antral follicles, which begins in the late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, requires FSH acting through its receptors on granulosa cells. The subsequent maturation of the dominant follicle requires acquisition of LH receptors on granulosa cells, which impart the ability to ovulate in response to the midcycle LH surge. Thus, follicular maturation is accompanied by a progressive ability of the follicle to respond to FSH at the small antral stage and to both LH and FSH at the preovulatory stage.

The two inhibins, heterodimers composed of an {alpha}-subunit and one of two ß-subunits forming inhibin A ({alpha}ßA) and inhibin B ({alpha}ßB), also exhibit unique patterns of expression and secretion during the menstrual cycle. In vitro studies demonstrate that inhibin ßB-subunit messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is expressed predominantly in small antral follicles, and ßA mRNA is expressed in the preovulatory follicle of the nonhuman primate (3) and human (4), whereas {alpha}-subunit mRNA expression is similar at both follicle stages in the human (4). Therefore, small antral follicles have the potential to secrete inhibin B, whereas preovulatory follicles may secrete inhibin A. Consistent with this hypothesis, inhibin B rises across the luteal-follicular transition and reaches its initial peak in the midfollicular phase coincident with growth of the cohort of recruited follicles (5, 6, 7). In contrast, inhibin A increases in the late follicular phase concomitant with the selection and maturation of the preovulatory follicle (7, 8, 9).

The patterns of inhibin B and inhibin A secretion in the follicular phase mirror those of FSH and LH, respectively, suggesting that FSH and LH may differentially regulate inhibin B and inhibin A secretion from small antral and preovulatory follicles. In vitro studies in the rat (10, 11, 12, 13), nonhuman primate (14), and human (15) indicate that FSH stimulates inhibin secretion from granulosa cells of immature or small antral follicles, and both FSH and LH stimulate inhibin secretion from granulosa cells of mature or preovulatory follicles. However, these studies used RIAs directed at the {alpha}-subunit of inhibin (16) and therefore did not distinguish between inhibin A and inhibin B. Recent human studies attempting to dissect the specific regulation of inhibin A and inhibin B demonstrated that both FSH and LH stimulate inhibin A and inhibin B secretion from luteinized granulosa cells (17). However, because these granulosa cells were stimulated with exogenous gonadotropins and hCG for in vitro fertilization and were well on the pathway to luteinization, their activities may not be representative of granulosa cells from normal follicles at earlier stages of development. The only human study examining dimeric inhibin regulation by FSH in vivo in subjects not previously stimulated by exogenous gonadotropins suggested that FSH stimulates both inhibin A and inhibin B (18). However, the size and developmental stage of the follicles were not determined in this study, nor was regulation by LH examined.

We hypothesized that the distinct regulation of inhibin A and inhibin B across the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle would depend on both the stage of follicle development and the predominance of either FSH or LH at that cycle stage. Specifically, we hypothesized that FSH stimulates inhibin B, but not inhibin A, secretion from small antral follicles during the early follicular phase, whereas both FSH and LH stimulate inhibin A, but not inhibin B, secretion from preovulatory follicles in the late follicular phase. To test these hypotheses, a series of controlled experiments was designed to dissect the specific effects of LH and FSH at the small antral and preovulatory follicle stage. Endogenous gonadotropin secretion was suppressed using a GnRH agonist to examine the independent effects of recombinant human LH (rhLH) or rhFSH administration on inhibin A and inhibin B secretion in women across all stages of small antral follicle development. Additional subjects were treated with rhFSH and estradiol (E2) to ensure that E2 levels were in the physiological range in GnRH agonist-treated subjects given rhFSH, alone. In a second group of GnRH agonist-treated subjects, a defined regimen of rhLH and rhFSH was used to induce development of a preovulatory follicle, at which time either rhLH or rhFSH was administered, and the inhibin A and inhibin B responses were measured. rhFSH was also administered to subjects with a preovulatory follicle in a spontaneous cycle in the absence of gonadotropin-induced multiple follicle development. Our results provide evidence that both gonadotropin stimulation and stage of follicle development contribute to the differential regulation of inhibin B and inhibin A in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Subjects and Methods

Experimental subjects

The study population consisted of 29 healthy subjects, aged 19–40 yr (mean ± SD, 28.2 ± 6.5 yr), with normal thyroid hormone and PRL levels, normal body mass index (mean ± SD, 23.4 ± 3.3 kg/m2), regular menstrual cycles (25–35 days in length), and ovulation in the cycle preceding the start of the study confirmed by a progesterone level greater than 3.5 ng/mL (11 nmol/L). Two subjects underwent 2 studies each, 1 spontaneous cycle and 1 with GnRH agonist treatment, for a total of 31 studies. Subjects had been taking no hormonal medications for at least 3 months and used barrier contraception throughout the study. Subjects were recruited using e-mail, posted, and newspaper advertisements and were remunerated for their time and effort. The study was approved by the subcommittee on human studies at the Massachusetts General Hospital, and all subjects gave written informed consent.

GnRH agonist pretreatment

Subjects in the first three series of studies (n = 26) received a GnRH agonist (3.75 mg Decapeptyl Depot, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kiel, Germany) 1–3 days after the onset of menses. Two weeks later, subjects underwent a GnRH stimulation test, 100 µg GnRH, iv (Factrel, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., Philadelphia, PA), to document gonadotropin suppression. The GnRH stimulation test was not performed in the final eight subjects studied due to unavailability of GnRH; however, baseline LH was 6 IU/L or less and FSH was 4 IU/L or less in these subjects. After completion of the GnRH stimulation test, subjects were randomly assigned to groups examining small antral follicles or preovulatory follicles.

Small antral follicles

LH or FSH administration. To analyze regulation of dimeric inhibin secretion across all stages of small antral follicle development, rhLH (Luveris, Serono Laboratories, Inc., Norwell, MA; 75 IU, sc, twice daily; n = 3) or rhFSH (Gonal-F, Serono Laboratories, Inc.; 150 IU, sc, daily; n = 6) was administered starting the day after documented gonadotropin suppression. The dose of rhLH has previously been demonstrated to increase E2 levels during ovulation induction in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (19). Treatment was continued until a dominant follicle developed (maximum follicle diameter of at least 10 mm) as documented by ultrasound. In subjects treated with rhLH, there was no change in follicle size, and hormone administration was discontinued after 7 days. Transvaginal ultrasounds (Toshiba SAL 77B) were performed at baseline and on days 5–6 of treatment. The growth rate of the largest follicle was estimated to be 2 mm/day, and subjects returned for a final ultrasound when their largest follicle was expected to be at least 10 mm. All follicles 9 mm or larger were counted. Blood samples were drawn daily before gonadotropin administration for measurement of FSH, LH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B.

FSH and E2 administration. To ensure that E2 levels were in the physiological range in GnRH agonist-treated subjects given rhFSH alone, an additional group of subjects was treated with rhFSH and E2. E2 (2 mg, orally, daily; Estrace, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Princeton, NJ) was administered for 2 days, at which time rhFSH (150 IU, sc) was added, and both were administered daily until follicle size reached at least 10 mm (n = 5). Ultrasound and blood sampling were performed as described for LH and FSH administration above.

Preovulatory follicles

LH or FSH administration. To examine dimeric inhibin regulation at the preovulatory stage of follicle development, subjects were treated with a GnRH agonist, then received an identical decreasing dose regimen of exogenous rhLH and rhFSH as previously described (20). Specifically, rhLH (75 IU, sc) and rhFSH (150 IU, sc) were administered daily until at least one follicle reached a diameter of 11 mm as documented by ultrasound, at which time the dose of rhFSH was reduced to 112.5 IU daily, then to 75 IU daily 3 days later. An ultrasound was performed at baseline, on day 7, then every 1–2 days until the maximum follicle diameter reached 16 mm. The maximum diameter and number of all follicles 7–9 mm or larger were measured. Blood samples were drawn daily for measurement of LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B. When at least one follicle reached 16 mm, rhLH (150 IU; n = 6) or rhFSH (150 IU; n = 6) was administered sc between 0800–0900 h. Blood was drawn at baseline, 2 h, then every 6 h from baseline for 36 h, with additional blood samples at 48, 72, and 96 h. Blood was analyzed for LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B. A final ultrasound was performed at 96 h to document follicle size and to assess the occurrence of ovulation.

FSH administration in spontaneous cycles. Treatment with exogenous gonadotropins resulted in the growth of more than 1 dominant follicle in 6 of 12 subjects along with multiple small and medium-sized follicles. Therefore, FSH regulation of dimeric inhibin secretion by the preovulatory follicle was studied in a second group of 5 subjects during a spontaneous menstrual cycle to avoid multifollicular development. Two subjects who participated in the GnRH agonist portion of the protocol were also studied during a spontaneous cycle at least 3 months later.

Starting on the day of or the day after menses, blood was drawn daily for measurements of LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B. Ultrasounds were performed at baseline, on day 7, then every 2–3 days until the maximum follicle diameter reached at least 16 mm. When one follicle reached 16 mm, rhFSH (150 IU) was administered sc between 0800–0900 h. Blood was drawn at baseline, at 2 h, then every 6 h from baseline for 36 h, with additional blood samples at 48, 72, and 96 h. Blood was analyzed for LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B. A final ultrasound was performed at 96 h to document follicle size and to assess the occurrence of ovulation.

Assays

FSH, LH, and E2 concentrations were determined using a two-site monoclonal nonisotopic system (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) according to the manufacturer’s directions, as previously described (21). Inhibin A and inhibin B were determined using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Serotec, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s directions, as previously described (7, 9). Inhibin A results are reported as international units per mL WHO International Standard 91/624 (0.15 IU International Standard = 1 pg inhibin A against Serotec calibrators). The limit of detection was 0.6 IU/mL for inhibin A and 15.6 pg/mL for inhibin B, with an intraassay coefficient of variation of 10% and an interassay coefficient of variation of less than 20% for both assays.

Data analysis

To examine gonadotropin regulation of inhibin, the data were log-normalized so that errors were normally distributed, and nonlinear mixed effects models (22) were fit to the observed trajectories of LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B. A quadratic mean function over time (in days) was assumed for LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B levels from small follicles. Separate coefficients were assumed for the LH, FSH, and FSH plus E2 experiments, and a random subject intercept was included to model subject-specific deviations from the mean. A piecewise quadratic mean function over time (in hours) with a cut-point at 24 h was assumed for LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B levels from preovulatory follicles in the GnRH agonist-treated cycles. A quadratic mean function over 24 h was assumed for LH, FSH, E2, inhibin A, and inhibin B in spontaneous cycles to exclude the onset of ovulation. For analyses of all preovulatory follicles (GnRH agonist-treated and spontaneous cycles), separate coefficients were assumed for the LH and FSH experiments, and a random intercept was included to model subject-specific deviations from the mean. Models were fit using a Bayesian analysis implemented via the BUGS software package (23). The Bayesian analysis yields a posterior probability distribution for each parameter in the model.

To assess whether a significant rise in hormone level occurred over the time course of each experiment, the posterior distribution of the difference between the maximum of the estimated mean function and the baseline value on the log scale was examined. A rise was considered significant if a 95% probability interval for the difference between maximum and baseline (an interval that contains the true difference with a probability of 0.95) fell to the right of the null value of zero. This corresponds to a posterior P < 0.05. To compare the effects of rhFSH and rhFSH plus E2 stimulation on small follicles, a 95% probability interval for the difference in the rise between the two experiments was examined and was determined to be significant (P < 0.05) if it did not contain the null difference of zero. Estimated baseline and maximum values are reported on the original untransformed scale as the mean ± SEM.

The follicle number and maximum follicle diameter for all follicles 4 mm or larger after rhLH administration and 9 mm or larger after rhFSH or rhFSH plus E2 administration was compared at baseline and at the completion of the small antral follicle study using paired t test. At the time of final rhLH or rhFSH administration in the preovulatory follicle study, follicle diameter for all follicles more than 9 mm and follicle number were compared 96 h later using paired t test.

Results

Small antral follicles

rhFSH or rhLH administration. rhLH administration resulted in a significant increase in serum LH levels (baseline to maximum, 6.3 ± 1.9 to 7.5 ± 2.4 IU/L; P < 0.05), with maximum levels achieved after 4.7 ± 0.7 days. There was no increase in FSH (4.0 ± 0.7 to 4.8 ± 0.8 IU/L; P = NS), E2 [14.4 ± 4.3 to 22.3 ± 6.4 pg/mL (52.9 ± 15.8 to 81.9 ± 23.5 pmol/L); P = NS], inhibin A (0.6 ± 0.2 to 0.7 ± 0.2 IU/mL; P = NS), or inhibin B levels (22.3 ± 8.6 to 27.0 ± 8.9 pg/mL; P = NS) during the 7 days of rhLH administration (Fig. 1Go). Maximum follicle diameter did not change after rhLH administration (5.0 ± 0 to 4.3 ± 0.3 mm; P = NS).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mean ± SEM baseline ({blacksquare}) and maximum ({square}) inhibin A (Inh A), E2, and inhibin B (Inh B) levels in small antral follicles after rhLH (A), rhFSH (B), or rhFSH plus E2 (C) stimulation in GnRH agonist-treated subjects. The scales for Inh A are located on the left axes, and those for E2 and Inh B are on the right axes. To convert estradiol to picomoles per L, multiply by 3.671. Note the difference in scale of the hormone data in rhLH stimulation cycles (A). **, P < 0.05.

 
rhFSH administration resulted in a dramatic increase in FSH to levels within the physiological midfollicular phase range (3.8 ± 0.5 to 15.5 ± 1.8 IU/L; P < 0.05) (7), with maximum levels achieved after 5.6 ± 0.2 days (Fig. 2AGo), and no increase in LH (4.0 ± 0.7 to 4.8 ± 0.8 IU/L; P = NS). During rhFSH administration, there was an increase in E2 [15.8 ± 3.6 to 95.3 ± 26.9 pg/mL (58.0 ± 13.2 to 349.8 ± 98.7 pmol/L); P < 0.05], inhibin A (0.6 ± 0.1 to 2.6 ± 0.6 IU/mL; P < 0.05), and inhibin B (17.4 ± 4.6 to 321.0 ± 97.0 pg/mL; P < 0.05), with maximum levels achieved on the final day (Figs. 1Go and 2AGo). In contrast to inhibin B, which increased within 24 h of rhFSH administration, inhibin A levels remained undetectable for 3 days before beginning a steady increase (Fig. 2AGo, inset), and were first detectable when follicles reached a diameter of 6–9 mm. Maximum follicle diameter (5.2 ± 0.9 to 11.2 ± 0.2 mm; P < 0.002) and number of follicles 9 mm or larger (0.2 ± 0.2 to 4.0 ± 1.2 follicles; P < 0.03) also increased significantly during the period of rhFSH administration.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A and B, Individual (dashed line) and mean (solid line) FSH, E2, inhibin A (Inh A), and inhibin B (Inh B) levels after sc administration of rhFSH (A) or rhFSH plus E2 (B) in subjects with small antral follicles. Data begin at baseline on the first day of rhFSH administration (A) and on the first day of rhFSH after 2 days of E2 (B). Insets, Individual and mean inhibin A and inhibin B levels during the first 4 days of hormone administration, demonstrating the earlier rise in inhibin B compared to inhibin A. To convert estradiol to picomoles per L, multiply by 3.671. Note that the increase in inhibin B in subjects given rhFSH and E2 (B) was greater than the increase in inhibin B in subjects given rhFSH alone (A). **, P < 0.05.

 
rhFSH and E2 administration. With rhFSH plus E2 administration, FSH levels increased (2.9 ± 0.4 to 14.7 ± 1.9 IU/L; P < 0.05), with maximum levels achieved after 6.0 ± 0.3 days (Fig. 2BGo), whereas there was no increase in LH (4.4 ± 1.0 to 4.4 ± 1.0 IU/L; P = NS). There was an increase in E2 [64.5 ± 16.7 to 205.7 ± 67.0 pg/mL (236.8 ± 61.3 to 755.1 ± 246.0 pmol/L); P < 0.05], inhibin A (0.7 ± 0.1 to 5.2 ± 1.5 IU/mL; P < 0.05), and inhibin B (23.2 ± 6.4 to 865.2 ± 294.5 pg/mL; P < 0.05) during rhFSH plus E2 administration, with maximum levels achieved on the final day of treatment (Figs. 1Go and 2BGo). In the rhFSH plus E2 group, E2 was higher at the beginning of rhFSH treatment (after 2 days of E2 administration) than with rhFSH alone, whereas inhibin B was not different at baseline in the two groups. However, the increase in inhibin B was greater after stimulation with rhFSH and E2 than with rhFSH alone (P < 0.05; Figs. 1Go and 2Go). There was no difference in the LH, FSH, E2, or inhibin A changes (baseline to maximum) between rhFSH and rhFSH plus E2 stimulation. Maximum follicle diameter (4.8 ± 0.4 to 11.0 ± 0.3 mm; P < 0.001) and number of follicles 9 mm or larger (0 ± 0 to 4.6 ± 0.9 follicles; P < 0.01) increased after rhFSH plus E2 administration, but were not greater than those after rhFSH alone.

Preovulatory follicles

rhLH or rhFSH administration. Administration of a single dose of rhLH in the presence of a preovulatory follicle resulted in a significant increase in serum LH levels (3.7 ± 0.9 to 4.4 ± 0.9 IU/L; P < 0.05), with maximum levels achieved after 10.9 ± 1.6 h. FSH levels declined steadily over 96 h (baseline to minimum, 14.0 ± 3.8 to 1.7 ± 1.4 IU/L; P < 0.05), consistent with discontinuation of rhFSH treatment. The increase in LH was accompanied by an increase in E2 [669.4 ± 285.5 to 943.6 ± 388.1 pg/mL (2457.4 ± 1048.1 to 3464.0 ± 1424.7 pmol/L); P < 0.05] at 23.7 ± 2.8 h and inhibin A (15.9 ± 10.3 to 21.5 ± 13.7 IU/mL; P < 0.05) at 16.3 ± 4.0 h (Fig. 3Go). Inhibin B did not increase in response to rhLH administration (1108.0 ± 550.8 to 927.4 ± 467.1 pg/mL; P = NS; Fig. 3Go). The number of follicles 16 mm or larger (1.7 ± 0.2 to 4.0 ± 0.7 follicles; P < 0.05) and maximum follicle size (17.7 ± 0.8 to 21.2 ± 1.2 mm; P = 0.05) increased in the 96 h after rhLH administration; however, the number of follicles 9 mm or larger (7.8 ± 1.9 to 9.0 ± 1.9 follicles; P = NS) did not. There was no evidence of ovulation in these subjects.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Mean ± SEM baseline ({blacksquare}) and maximum ({square}) inhibin A (Inh A), E2, and inhibin B (Inh B) levels in preovulatory follicles after rhLH (A) or rhFSH (B) stimulation in GnRH agonist-treated subjects and after rhFSH stimulation in spontaneous cycles (C). The scales for Inh A are located on the left axes, and those for E2 and Inh B are shown on the right axes. To convert E2 to picomoles per L, multiply by 3.671. Note the difference in scale of the hormone data in spontaneous cycles (C). **, P < 0.05.

 
rhFSH administration in the presence of a preovulatory follicle resulted in a significant increase in FSH levels (14.5 ± 3.7 to 15.7 ± 3.9 IU/L; P < 0.05), with maximum levels achieved after 11.5 ± 2.9 h. The FSH levels achieved were slightly higher than those observed in the late follicular phase of spontaneous cycles (7). LH levels did not change over 96 h. The increase in FSH was accompanied by an increase in E2 [404.4 ± 213.6 to 552.0 ± 295.5 pg/mL (1484.6 ± 784.1 to 2026.4 ± 1084.8 pmol/L); P < 0.05] at 23.0 ± 4.0 h, inhibin A (7.4 ± 3.8 to 13.7 ± 6.8 IU/mL; P < 0.05) at 24.0 ± 0.4 h, and inhibin B (718.0 ± 440.9 to 975.5 ± 569.2 pg/mL; P < 0.05) at 23.2 ± 3.1 h after rhFSH administration (Fig. 3Go). In the 96 h after rhFSH administration, there was no change in the number of follicles 9 mm or larger (8.5 ± 7.6 to 9.6 ± 3.7 follicles; P = NS) or 16 mm or larger (2.5 ± 1.3 to 5.0 ± 2.8 follicles; P = NS) or in maximum follicle size (17.5 ± 0.6 to 20.8 ± 2.3 mm; P = NS). There was also no difference in follicle number or maximum follicle size after administration of rhFSH compared with rhLH. There was no evidence of ovulation in these subjects.

rhFSH administration in spontaneous cycles. In spontaneous cycles, FSH increased 12 h after rhFSH administration (8.8 ± 3.6 to 11.8 ± 5.0 IU/L; P < 0.05). The increase in FSH was accompanied by increases in E2 [226.4 ± 102.7 to 264.7 ± 121.0 pg/mL (831.1 ± 337.0 to 971.7 ± 444.2 pmol/L); P < 0.05] and inhibin A (2.6 ± 1.3 to 3.7 ± 1.9 IU/mL; P < 0.05), but not inhibin B (76.3 ± 32.2 to 77.6 ± 32.8 pg/mL; P = NS). At the time of rhFSH administration, subjects had only one follicle 16 mm or larger (mean size, 17.6 ± 1.1 mm). Zero to three follicles 9 mm or larger were observed in addition to the largest follicle, with a maximum size of 11 mm in two of five subjects. The LH surge occurred 36–96 h after rhFSH administration in all subjects.

Discussion

The distinct patterns of inhibin A and inhibin B secretion observed across the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (5, 6, 7, 8, 9) and their relationship to LH and FSH secretion suggest that the regulation of inhibin A and inhibin B secretion is dependent on stage of follicle development and/or differential gonadotropin stimulation. The current study attempted to resolve these effects using a controlled series of experiments that isolated LH and FSH and the distinct follicle stage. The results indicate that both gonadotropin stimulation and the stage of follicle development determine the species of dimeric inhibin secreted.

Suppression of endogenous gonadotropin secretion using a GnRH agonist allowed us to examine dimeric inhibin regulation from small antral follicles in response to physiological doses of either rhLH or rhFSH. Both inhibin A and inhibin B were stimulated by rhFSH administration, whereas rhLH did not stimulate either inhibin, consistent with the absence of LH receptors on follicles at this stage of development (1). Previous studies using varying FSH doses in GnRH agonist-treated infertility patients (24) and two defined FSH doses in normal women in the early follicular phase (18) demonstrated that FSH stimulates both inhibin A and inhibin B. It is clear from the current data, however, that inhibin B secretion precedes that of inhibin A during small antral follicle development. Similarly, FSH stimulation results in preferential inhibin B secretion across the luteal-follicular transition in GnRH-deficient women (6) and a more pronounced inhibin B than inhibin A increase in the early follicular phase of normal women (18). In vitro studies suggest that inhibin ßB-subunit mRNA is more abundant than ßA-subunit mRNA in small antral follicles (4), perhaps accounting for the more robust inhibin B protein secretion. Taken together, these studies indicate that control of inhibin B secretion is dependent on FSH, but not LH, during the early stages of follicular growth.

However, recent in vitro studies suggest that FSH regulation of inhibin B secretion may be more complex than it appears from the in vivo data (25). In vitro, the granulosa cells of small antral follicles secrete inhibin B in the absence of gonadotropin stimulation (25). FSH alone did not stimulate inhibin B secretion from the granulosa cells of these small antral follicles. Indeed, it was only the combination of IGF-I and FSH that stimulated inhibin B secretion, suggesting that IGF-I is critical for inhibin B stimulation by FSH. Even in the presence of IGF-I, however, the increase in inhibin B (<2-fold) was less pronounced than the increase in inhibin A (>4-fold) under these in vitro conditions (25). In contrast to in vitro findings, the current in vivo data demonstrate that FSH stimulation increases serum inhibin B levels almost 20-fold, whereas inhibin A increases only 5-fold. FSH stimulation is known to have a dramatic effect on granulosa cell number and follicle size (1). Thus, it is likely that the increases in the number of granulosa cells and the number of developing follicles induced by FSH stimulation play a more prominent role in increasing inhibin B serum levels than the direct stimulation of inhibin B from granulosa cells, even in the presence of IGF-I.

In contrast to the early increase in inhibin B in response to rhFSH, inhibin A did not reach the limit of detection in all six subjects until the fourth day of rhFSH stimulation in the current study, when the largest follicle was 6–9 mm in diameter. This finding is consistent with previous studies demonstrating that inhibin A is not detectable in serum until relatively late in the process of follicular maturation (7, 21). In contrast to the current study, FSH administration on days 3–5 in the early follicular phase of normal cycling women resulted in a rapid and immediate increase in inhibin A (18), probably related to the more advanced development of the follicles in the absence of gonadotropin suppression in that study. Nonetheless, inhibin A protein is detectable in the follicular fluid of follicles as small as 6 mm (26, 27), and inhibin A is secreted from granulosa cells of follicles as small as 2–4 mm (25). Taken together, these findings point to the requirement for a critical mass of granulosa cells or follicles before inhibin A is detectable in serum.

The combination of E2 and rhFSH resulted in a greater increase in inhibin B from small antral follicles than did rhFSH administration alone. This effect was not related to an increase in the number or size of the follicles detectable on ultrasound, although granulosa cell proliferation or an increase in the number of undetectable follicles cannot be ruled out. Further, the effect appeared to be specific to small antral follicles, as neither rhLH nor rhFSH stimulated inhibin B secretion from preovulatory follicles despite high E2 levels. Previous studies in rat granulosa cells demonstrate that E2 alone increased inhibin A, with only a minor effect on inhibin B secretion (28). E2 augmented FSH-stimulated inhibin secretion in nonhuman primate granulosa cells from immature follicles (14); however, only testosterone and nonaromatizable 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone enhanced FSH-stimulated inhibin secretion in human granulosa cells from immature follicles (15). The effect of E2 alone on dimeric inhibin secretion in the human has not been evaluated in vitro. Although current in vivo studies suggest that E2 enhances inhibin B secretion from small antral follicles, further studies will be needed to confirm this effect and to determine the mechanism by which E2 augments inhibin B secretion at early stages of follicle development.

In preovulatory follicles, rhLH stimulated inhibin A secretion exclusively. The inhibin A increase was seen despite an increase in LH of only 0.7 IU/L. We previously found a strong correlation between inhibin A and LH during recovery after administration of a GnRH antagonist in the late follicular phase (21) and hypothesized that LH is the primary factor stimulating inhibin A in the preovulatory follicle. Similarly, LH and hCG consistently stimulated inhibin A, but not inhibin B, secretion in vitro from luteinized granulosa cells from women undergoing in vitro fertilization (17). The absence of an associated inhibin B increase after rhLH stimulation in the preovulatory follicle may be due to absent (4) or low levels (3) of inhibin ßB-subunit mRNA in dominant follicles. Alternatively, the different mechanisms by which inhibin A and inhibin B are regulated may play a role. Recent studies in human granulosa cells demonstrate that cAMP stimulates inhibin A, but not inhibin B, secretion from granulosa cells in vitro (25), and LH signals intracellularly via cAMP. Taken together with the parallel rise in LH and inhibin A levels during the late follicular phase, these findings support the hypothesis that LH directly controls the pattern of inhibin A secretion in mature follicles.

FSH stimulation is more complex. Although rhFSH predominantly stimulated inhibin A secretion in GnRH agonist-treated subjects after the development of a preovulatory follicle, inhibin B levels also increased. The standardized exogenous rhFSH and rhLH regimen used to ensure uniform gonadotropin stimulation in all subjects resulted in the growth of multiple small (<10 mm) and medium-sized (10–15 mm) follicles in addition to preovulatory follicles (>=16 mm) in these subjects. As rhFSH increased both inhibin A and inhibin B secretion from small follicles, but rhLH did not, it was unclear whether small and medium-sized follicles and/or the preovulatory follicle contribute to rhFSH-stimulated serum inhibin A and inhibin B levels in the late follicular phase after rhFSH stimulation.

We therefore examined rhFSH-stimulated dimeric inhibin secretion from preovulatory follicles in spontaneous menstrual cycles to avoid the confounding effect of multifollicular development. In these spontaneous cycles, only one preovulatory follicle developed, accompanied by one to four additional follicles of 11 mm or less. When rhFSH was administered, inhibin A and E2, but not inhibin B, secretion was elicited. These findings suggest that gonadotropin stimulation of the preovulatory follicle does not contribute to serum inhibin B levels in the late follicular phase of the normal menstrual cycle. Further, they are consistent with our previous findings in which the recovery of inhibin A secretion from the preovulatory follicle was not correlated with inhibin B after treatment with a GnRH antagonist in the late follicular phase in normal women (21). If the majority of serum inhibin B results from increased granulosa cell and follicle number (25) as discussed previously, the continued rise in inhibin B with FSH stimulation in gonadotropin-stimulated cycles (24, 29), as opposed to the decrease seen in the late follicular phase of spontaneous cycles (5, 7), probably results from inhibin B secretion from continued growth of small and medium-sized follicles. In contrast, after the development of a dominant follicle in spontaneous cycles, administration of FSH does not increase the number of nondominant follicles (30) or granulosa cell proliferation (31), thus accounting for the absence of a serum inhibin B increase after rhFSH stimulation in the late follicular phase of spontaneous cycles in the current study.

In summary, in small antral follicles, inhibin B is an immediate product of FSH stimulation, and its increase may result indirectly from FSH-stimulated follicle growth rather than direct stimulation. Inhibin B, but not inhibin A, secretion from these small antral follicles is enhanced by E2. Inhibin A is stimulated at a later stage of follicle growth and becomes the predominant form of inhibin secreted in response to both FSH and LH from the preovulatory follicle. In conclusion, the increase in both FSH and E2 in the early follicular phase results in an increase in inhibin B secretion, whereas the selective LH rise in the late follicular phase favors inhibin A secretion. Thus, both the differential secretion of LH and FSH and the stage of follicle development determine the patterns of inhibin A and inhibin B secretion in the normal menstrual cycle.

Acknowledgments

We thank the nurses of the Mallinkrodt General Clinical Research Center for their exceptional patient care and organization. We also acknowledge Patrick Sluss, Ph.D., and the members of the Reproductive Sciences Core Laboratory for their assay expertise. We thank Ferring Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Kiel, Germany) for providing Decapeptyl Depot, and Serono Laboratories, Inc. (Norwell, MA), for supplying the recombinant human LH (Luveris) and recombinant human FSH (Gonal-F).

Footnotes

1 This work was supported by NIH Grants U54-HD-29164, M01-RR-01066, K24-HD-01290, and P30-HD-28138. Back

Received September 11, 2000.

Revised December 1, 2000.

Accepted December 8, 2000.

References

  1. Gougeon A. 1993 Dynamics of human follicular growth: a morphologic perspective. In: Adashi EY, Leung PCK, eds. The ovary. New York: Raven Press; 21–40.
  2. Adashi EY. 1996 The ovarian follicular apparatus. In: Adashi EY, Rock JA, Rosenwaks Z, eds. Reproductive endocrinology, surgery and technology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 17–40.
  3. Schwall RH, Mason AJ, Wilcox JN, Bassett SG, Zeleznik AJ. 1990 Localization of inhibin/activin subunit mRNAs within the primate ovary. Mol Endocrinol. 4:75–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Roberts VJ, Barth S, El-Roeiy A, Yen SSC. 1993 Expression of inhibin/activin subunits and follistatin messenger ribonucleic acids and proteins in ovarian follicles and the corpus luteum during the human menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1402–1410.[Abstract]
  5. Groome NP, Illingworth PJ, O’Brien M, et al. 1996 Measurement of dimeric inhibin B throughout the human menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1401–1405.[Abstract]
  6. Welt CK, Martin KA, Taylor AE, et al. 1997 Frequency modulation of FSH during the luteal-follicular transition: evidence for FSH control of inhibin B in normal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:2645–2652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Welt CK, McNicholl D, Taylor AE, Hall JE. 1999 Female reproductive aging is marked by decreased secretion of dimeric inhibin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:105–111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Groome NP, Illingworth PJ, O’Brien M, et al. 1994 Detection of dimeric inhibin throughout the human menstrual cycle by two-site enzyme immunoassay. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 40:717–723.[Medline]
  9. Lambert-Messerlian GM, Hall JE, Sluss PM, et al. 1994 Relatively low levels of dimeric inhibin circulate in men and women with polycystic ovarian syndrome using a specific two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:45–50.[Abstract]
  10. Bicsak TA, Tucker EM, Cappel S, et al. 1986 Hormonal regulation of granulosa cell inhibin biosynthesis. Endocrinology. 119:2711–2719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Suzuki T, Miyamoto K, Hasegawa Y, et al. 1987 Regulation of inhibin production by rat granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 54:185–195.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Zhang Z, Lee VWK, Carson RS, Burger HG. 1988 Selective control of rat granulosa cell inhibin production by FSH and LH in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 56:35–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Aloi JA, Dalkin AC, Schwartz NB, et al. 1995 Ovarian inhibin subunit gene expression: regulation by gonadotropins and estradiol. Endocrinology. 136:1227–1232.[Abstract]
  14. Hillier SG, Wickings EJ, Saunders PTK, et al. 1989 Control of inhibin production by primate granulosa cells. J Endocrinol. 123:65–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Hillier SG, Wickings EJ, Illingworth PJ, et al. 1991 Control of immunoactive inhibin production by human granulosa cells. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 35:71–78.[Medline]
  16. Schneyer A, Mason A, Burton L, Ziegner J, Crowley Jr WF. 1990 Immunoreactive inhibin {alpha}-subunit in human serum. Implications for radioimmunoassay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1208–1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Muttukrishna S, Groome N, Ledger W. 1997 Gonadotropic control of secretion of dimeric inhibins and activin A by human granulosa-luteal cells in vitro. J Assisted Reprod Gen. 14:566–574.
  18. Burger HG, Groome NP, Robertson DM. 1998 Both inhibin A and B respond to exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone in the follicular phase of the human menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:4167–4169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. European Recombinant Human LH Study Group. 1998 Recombinant human luteinizing hormone (LH) to support recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)-induced follicular development in LH- and FSH-deficient anovulatory women: a dose finding study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:1507–1514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. van Santbrink EJP, Donderwinkel PFJ, van Dessel TJHM, Fauser BCJM. 1995 Gonadotrophin induction of ovulation using a step-down dose regimen: single-centre clinical experience in 82 patients. Hum Reprod. 10:1048–1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Welt CK, Adams JM, Sluss PM, Hall JE. 1999 Inhibin A and inhibin B responses to gonadotropin withdrawal depends on stage of follicle development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:2163–2169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM. 1990 Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics. 46:673–687.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A, Best NG, Gilks WR. 1996 BUGS: Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling, version 0.5.
  24. Lockwood GM, Muttukrishna S, Groome NP, Knight PG, Ledger WL. 1996 Circulating inhibins and activin A during GnRH-analogue down-regulation and ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH for in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 45:741–748.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Welt CK, Schneyer AL. Differential regulation of inhibin B and inhibin A by FSH and local growth factors in human granulosa cells from small antral follicles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 86:330–336.
  26. Magoffin DA, Jakimiuk AJ. 1997 Inhibin A, inhibin B and activin A in the follicular fluid of regularly cycling women. Hum Reprod. 12:1714–1719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Schneyer AL, Fujiwara T, Fox J, et al. 2000 Dynamic changes in the intrafollicular inhibin/activin/follistatin axis during human follicular development: relationship to circulating hormone concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:3319–3330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lanuza GM, Groome NP, Baranao JL, Campo S. 1999 Dimeric inhibin A and B production are differentially regulated by hormones and local factors in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 140:2549–2554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Hall JE, Welt CK, Cramer DW. 1998 Inhibin A and inhibin B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome. Hum Reprod. 14:409–415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. DiZerega GS, Hodgen GD. 1981 Folliculogenesis in the primate ovarian cycle. Endocr Rev. 2:27–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Gougeon A, Testart J. 1990 Influence of human menopausal gonadotropin on the recruitment of human ovarian follicles. Fertil Steril. 54:848–852.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. G. Hillier
Paracrine support of ovarian stimulation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 15(12): 843 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
F. J. Broekmans, M. R. Soules, and B. C. Fauser
Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 465 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Hirshfeld-Cytron, R. B. Barnes, D. A. Ehrmann, A. Caruso, M. M. Mortensen, and R. L. Rosenfield
Characterization of Functionally Typical and Atypical Types of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 1587 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. E. Kevenaar, A. P.N. Themmen, J. S.E. Laven, B. Sonntag, S. L. Fong, A. G. Uitterlinden, F. H. de Jong, H. A.P. Pols, M. Simoni, and J. A. Visser
Anti-Mullerian hormone and anti-Mullerian hormone type II receptor polymorphisms are associated with follicular phase estradiol levels in normo-ovulatory women
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1547 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Y. Andersen, P. Humaidan, H. B. Ejdrup, L. Bungum, M.L. Grondahl, and L.G. Westergaard
Hormonal characteristics of follicular fluid from women receiving either GnRH agonist or hCG for ovulation induction
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2126 - 2130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. M. Lambert-Messerlian and B. L. Harlow
The Influence of Depression, Body Mass Index, and Smoking on Serum Inhibin B Levels in Late Reproductive-Aged Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 1496 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Wang, H. Newton, J. A. Spaliviero, C. M. Allan, B. Marshan, D. J. Handelsman, and P. J. Illingworth
Gonadotropin Control of Inhibin Secretion and the Relationship to Follicle Type and Number in the hpg Mouse
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 610 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. K. Welt, P. C. Smith, and A. E. Taylor
Evidence of Early Ovarian Aging in Fragile X Premutation Carriers
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4569 - 4574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Popovic, M. Djurovic, A. Cetkovic, D. Vojvodic, S. Pekic, S. Spremovic, M. Petakov, S. Damjanovic, N. Milic, C. Dieguez, et al.
Inhibin B: A Potential Marker of Gonadal Activity in Patients with Anorexia Nervosa during Weight Recovery
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1838 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K.I. Parker, D.M. Robertson, N.P. Groome, and K.L. Macmillan
Plasma Concentrations of Inhibin A and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Differ Between Cows with Two or Three Waves of Ovarian Follicular Development in a Single Estrous Cycle
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 822 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. K. Welt, A. E. Taylor, K. A. Martin, and J. E. Hall
Serum Inhibin B in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Regulation by Insulin and Luteinizing Hormone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5559 - 5565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. A. Klein, A. J. Harper, B. S. Houmard, P. M. Sluss, and M. R. Soules
Is the Short Follicular Phase in Older Women Secondary to Advanced or Accelerated Dominant Follicle Development?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5746 - 5750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
C. Welt, Y. Sidis, H. Keutmann, and A. Schneyer
Activins, Inhibins, and Follistatins: From Endocrinology to Signaling. A Paradigm for the New Millennium
Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2002; 227(9): 724 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welt, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welt, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals