| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Letters to the Editor |
University of Siena Siena 53100, Italy
To the editor:
First, we recognize that the general methodological concepts expressed by Dr. Pearson Murphy have been known for many years because they are the fundamental principles of a correct endocrinological investigation in vitro and in vivo.
In her recent letter Dr. Pearson Murphy asked how the assay for allopregnanolone is specific. The method used to measure serum allopregnanolone by Luisi et al. (1) is identical to that described by Purdy et al. (2). They used different polyclonal antiserum raised in sheep, and not in rabbit, against allopregnanolone carboxymenthyl ether coupled to BSA.
This antiserum shows a very low cross-reactivity with other steroids tested (3). Therefore, it was used also to perform other studies that have investigated healthy women (4), patients with amenorrhoea (5) or with premenstrual syndrome (6).
Our preliminary investigations suggested that to determine allopregnanolone in human serum or/and animal organs (7) is not necessary to perform preliminary purification by high-performance liquid chromatography.
Then, comparing the data obtained by Purdy et al. (2) with ours (4), it is clear that our data are significantly lower, suggesting no cross-reactivity with other steroids.
Received December 18, 2000.
References
-hydroxy-5
-pregnan-20-one in rat and
human plasma. Steroids. 55:290296.[CrossRef][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |