help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chazenbalk, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chazenbalk, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 3 1287-1293
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

A Prion-Like Shift between Two Conformational Forms of a Recombinant Thyrotropin Receptor A-Subunit Module: Purification and Stabilization Using Chemical Chaperones of the Form Reactive with Graves’ Autoantibodies1

Gregorio D. Chazenbalk, Sandra M. McLachlan, Pavel Pichurin, Xin-Min Yan and Basil Rapoport

Autoimmune Disease Unit, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute and School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90048

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Basil Rapoport, M.B., Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Suite B-131, Los Angeles, California 90048. E-mail: rapoportb{at}cshs.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A secreted recombinant TSH receptor (TSHR) ectodomain variant (TSHR-289) neutralizes TSHR autoantibodies in Graves’ disease, but is heterogeneous in containing both immunologically active and inactive molecules and is also unstable. We have now purified each form of TSHR-289 using sequential affinity chromatography with a mouse mAb (3BD10) specific for the inactive form, and a mAb to C-terminal His residues that recognizes both forms. The immunological difference between active and inactive TSHR-289 was unrelated to primary amino acid sequence or carbohydrate content and was, therefore, attributable to its folded state. The epitopes for Graves’ autoantibodies and 3BD10 overlap, and both are destroyed by denaturation. Therefore, reciprocal binding by autoantibodies and 3BD10 to conformational determinants involving the same TSHR segment suggests a prion-like shift between two folded states of the molecule. Despite purification, immunologically active TSHR-289 remained labile, as determined by loss of autoantibody, and gain of 3BD10, recognition. However, using chemical chaperones we have, for the first time, been able to stabilize purified TSHR antigen in immunologically intact form.

In summary, purification of immunologically active and stable antigen in milligram quantities provides a powerful tool for future diagnostic and therapeutic studies in Graves’ disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AUTOANTIBODIES TO the TSH receptor (TSHR) are the direct cause of Graves’ disease, one of the most common organ-specific autoimmune disease affecting humans. Progress in understanding the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease as well as the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches depends on the availability of TSHR antigen. However, TSHR capable of being recognized by autoantibodies has never been purified from thyroid tissue, and in the past decade it has proven difficult to generate suitable recombinant antigen (reviewed in Ref. 1). As revealed by studies with chimeric TSH-LH receptors, the binding sites on the TSHR ectodomain for TSH (2) and autoantibodies (3) are discontinuous and conformational. Furthermore, the TSHR ectodomain is highly glycosylated (4). Not surprisingly, therefore, after much initial effort with prokaryotic cells, insect cells, cell-free translates, and synthetic polypeptides, the present emphasis is on mammalian cells as a source of recombinant TSHR for investigating human autoantibody interactions (reviewed in Ref. 1).

Different strategies have been used for generating substantial quantities of conformationally intact, recombinant TSHR in mammalian cells. Membrane-associated proteins have been produced in the form of the holoreceptor with its seven membrane-spanning segments (5, 6, 7, 8), as a protein with a single transmembrane region (9), or with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored domain (10, 11). Attempts to convert the TSHR ectodomain into a secreted protein by introduction of a stop codon proximal to the plasma membrane (amino acid residue 418) were unsuccessful, with intracellular retention of a protein containing immature carbohydrate (12, 13). However, more modular truncations of the TSHR ectodomain further upstream (residues 309, 289, and 261), in the vicinity of the site of intramolecular cleavage into A and B subunits (reviewed in Ref. 1), did lead to secretion of an autoantibody-reactive protein corresponding approximately to the A-subunit (14).

In principle, a secreted protein that is not encumbered by a lipid layer and that does not require release by proteolytic digestion is preferable for immunological and structural studies. Unfortunately, lability of the secreted TSHR A-subunit prevented its purification to homogeneity (15). Even more daunting, the secreted TSHR A-subunit was found to be heterogeneous, containing two distinct forms reciprocally interactive with patients’ autoantibodies and a mouse monoclonal antibody (15). In the present study, using two different mouse monoclonal antibody affinity columns in series, we report the separation and purification to near homogeneity in milligram quantities of each of these two forms of the TSHR. Moreover, using chemical chaperones we have, for the first time, been able to stabilize purified TSHR antigen in immunologically intact form. These findings will facilitate future studies on the structural properties of the TSHR ectodomain as well as on the pathogenesis of Graves’ disease.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Purification of TSHR-289 by sequential affinity chromatography

Construction and overexpression by transgenome amplification of the plasmid for the TSHR truncated at amino acid residue 289 with six histidine residues at the C-terminus have been described previously (14, 15). TSHR-289-expressing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were cultured in Ham’s F-12 medium containing 10% FCS, antibiotics, and 2.5 mmol/L sodium butyrate. Conditioned medium was harvested every 2 days, cell debris was removed by centrifugation (400 x g for 10 min at 4 C), and the medium was stored at -80 C.

Two separate mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) affinity columns were made by coupling to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) mAb 3BD10 (15) (20 mL; bed volume, 1.5 mg IgG/mL) and Penta-His anti-5H mAb (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA; 10 mL; bed volume, 1.0 mg/mL), according to the protocol of the manufacturer. After thawing, the medium was filtered (0.22-µm pore size), and 2 L were applied (1 mL/min at 4 C) to the 3BD10 column linked in series with the anti-His column. After extensive washing of both columns (still in series) with 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 150 mmol/L NaCl, the columns were separated, and protein was eluted from each with 0.2 mol/L glycine, pH 2.3. Fractions (1.6 mL) were immediately neutralized with 0.4 mL 2 mol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Fractions containing the eluted protein (determined by absorption at 280 nm) were pooled; dialyzed against 10 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.4), 50 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.02% sodium azide; concentrated using a Centriprep 30 (Amicon, Beverly, MA); and stored at -80 C. Aliquots of concentrated material were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and stained with Coomassie blue. Prestained molecular size markers (Sigma), previously calibrated against more accurate unstained markers were used to determine protein size. Samples were also analyzed after enzymatic deglycosylation with N-glycosidase F (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA) according to the protocol of the manufacturer.

N-Terminal sequence determination

TSHR-289 protein eluted from both the 3BD10 and anti-His affinity columns was enzymatically deglycosylated, electrophoresed on 10% polyacrylamide gels (see above), electrophoretically transferred to polyvinyl difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA), and stained with Coomassie blue. N-Terminal amino acid sequences were determined by the Protein Structure Laboratory, University of California (Davis, CA).

Assay for TSHR autoantibodies in Graves’ patients serum to recognize truncated TSHR-289

TSHR autoantibody kits were purchased from Kronus (Boise, ID). This assay measures the ability of autoantibodies to bind to TSHR in a solubilized porcine thyroid extract, thereby competing for [125I]TSH binding to the same preparation (16). We modified this TSH binding inhibition (TBI) assay to detect TSHR-289 neutralization of patients’ autoantibodies, as previously described (14). An important principle of this modified TBI assay is that only patients’ autoantibodies, but not TSH, can bind to TSHR-289 whereas both autoantibodies and TSH bind to the porcine holoreceptors. In brief, 25 µL TSHR-289 were preincubated (30 min at room temperature) with 25 µL Graves’ serum. Solubilized porcine TSHR (50 µL) was then added (20 min at room temperature), followed by 100 µL [125I]TSH (2 h at room temperature). TSHR-[125I]TSH complexes were then precipitated with polyethylene glycol. Autoantibody activity was expressed as [125I]TSH binding in the presence of Graves’ serum relative to [125I]TSH binding in the presence of serum from healthy individuals without thyroid disease (100%). Recognition of TSHR-289 by patients’ autoantibodies was evident by the ability of TSHR-289 to adsorb out TBI activity, thereby reversing the inhibition of [125I]TSH binding to the porcine holoreceptors.

In some experiments the stability of TSHR-289 recognition by patients’ autoantibodies was examined by incubating the protein at different temperatures for different periods of time in the presence of a variety of solutes; trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), trehalose, proline, glycerol (all from Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and Tween-20 (J. T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ). After these preincubations, the TSHR-289 material was tested for autoantibody functional integrity as described above.

Relative recognition by different mouse and human antibodies of the two forms of TSHR-289

Anti-His mouse mAb was radiolabeled with 125I to a specific activity of approximately 100 µCi/ug using Iodo-Gen (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL). This material was precomplexed (1 h at room temperature) to TSHR-289 eluted from either the 3BD10 or the anti-His affinity columns linked in series (0.2 µg [125I]anti-His mAb plus 0.1 µg TSHR-289). Aliquots (2 µL at the indicated dilutions) of the following mouse or human antibodies were applied to nitrocellulose filters and air-dried: mouse mAb A9 to the TSHR (provided by Dr. Paul Banga, King’s College, London, UK) (17), mouse mAb 3BD10 (15), normal mouse serum, sera from two Graves’ patients with TSHR autoantibodies, and sera from two normal individuals without thyroid disease. Filters were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 3% milk powder in 10 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.4) and 150 mmol/L NaCl (TBS), rinsed with TBS, and then incubated (1 h at room temperature) in TBS with 1% BSA and 106 cpm/mL of the [125I]anti-His mAb plus TSHR-289 complex. After further washing with TBS buffer containing 0.05% Tween-20, radiolabeled complexes bound to antibodies on the filters were visualized by autoradiography using Kodak BioMax MS x-ray film (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Separation and purification of the immunologically active and inactive forms of TSHR-289

The TSHR truncated at amino acid residue 289 (TSHR-289) is secreted and is potent in neutralizing TSHR autoantibodies. However, this material could not be purified to homogeneity by nickel-chelate chromatography using the six His residues at its C-terminus, was heterogeneous in containing both immunologically active and inactive molecules, and was functionally unstable in terms of autoantibody recognition (15). Moreover, a mouse mAb (3BD10) raised to TSHR-289 reacted specifically with the inactive, dominant component (15). In the present study we considered the possibility that mAb 3BD10 could be an asset rather than an ineffective reagent. Thus, we hypothesized that preapplication of conditioned medium from CHO cell cultures to a 3BD10 affinity column would remove inactive TSHR-289 and that the flow-through could be applied directly to an anti-His affinity column in series. Although both active and inactive forms of TSHR-289 contain a His-tail, the prior removal of inactive TSHR-289 would leave only the active form of TSHR-289 available for capture (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Strategy for separation and purification of active and inactive forms of TSHR-289, as defined by their ability or inability to neutralize TSHR autoantibodies in Graves’ patient serum. Conditioned medium from CHO cell cultures was applied to two mouse mAb affinity columns in series. The purpose of the 3BD10 affinity column was to remove immunologically inactive TSHR-289 before application to the anti-His mAb affinity column. Separate elution from each column would then yield the two forms of TSHR-289.

 
Indeed, this strategy was successful. First, both 3BD10 and anti-His affinity columns were effective in purifying to near homogeneity TSHR-289 after a single passage of conditioned medium from CHO cell cultures (Fig. 2Go). As evident by Coomassie blue staining, a similar yield (~0.6–0.75 mg/L applied medium) was obtained from the separated 3BD10 and anti-His columns (in series before elution). In other preparations, the proportion of active to inactive TSHR-289 varied from approximately 25–50%. The electrophoretic mobility and appearance of the material eluted from either column were indistinguishable. Remarkably, however, despite the similarity in their physical appearance, the two preparations were very different in their immunological properties with respect to TSHR autoantibodies in Graves’ patient serum. Thus, TSHR-289 eluted from the 3BD10 column did not reverse the TSH binding inhibitory activity of TSHR autoantibodies even at the very high concentration of 1250 ng/tube (0.2 mL total volume; Fig. 3Go, upper panel). In contrast, only 5 ng TSHR-289 eluted from the anti-His column neutralized nearly all of the TSH binding inhibitory activity in the same patient’s serum (Fig. 3Go, lower panel). Therefore, the dual affinity column strategy effectively separated active from inactive TSHR-289.



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Purification to near homogeneity of TSHR-289. Conditioned medium from CHO cell cultures (2 L) was applied to the 3BD10 and anti-His mAb affinity columns as described in Fig. 1Go. The material eluted from each column was neutralized, dialyzed, concentrated to approximately 1 mg/mL, and subjected to PAGE (10%) under reducing conditions followed by staining with Coomassie blue. The indicated volumes of each sample were applied to the gel. Note that because approximately 40% of the mass of the molecule is carbohydrate, the dominant band is broad and stains relatively weakly. We estimated the approximate yield of TSHR-289 based on a putative absorption coefficient (280 nm) of 13.5 for the polypeptide chain and supplementing this value by the proportion of glycan.

 


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Different immunological properties of TSHR-289 eluted from the 3BD10 and anti-His mAb affinity columns. Recognition by autoantibodies in Graves’ patient serum was determined in a modified TBI assay (see Materials and Methods). TSHR-289 purified from the 3BD10 column (upper panel) and the anti-His column (lower panel) were tested with the same Graves’ serum containing TSHR autoantibodies. This serum, in the absence of TSHR-289, inhibited [125I]TSH binding to about 40% of that observed with serum from a normal individual (100%; {blacksquare}). The hatched area between 40% and 100% depicts the range of TBI activities in the presence of varying concentrations of TSHR-289 (up to 1250 ng/tube; volume, 0.2 mL). Only the material eluted from the anti-His mAb column (lower panel) neutralized TSHR autoantibody binding and was, therefore, immunologically active.

 
Structural differences between the immunologically active and inactive forms of TSHR-289

Determination of a structural difference between the active and inactive forms of TSHR-289 could provide important information on the immunological properties of TSHR autoantibodies, including their epitopes. In particular, the immunological difference between active and inactive TSHR-289 could be related to a change in primary amino acid sequence (N- or C-terminal clipping) or to an alteration in protein folding. As shown above (Fig. 2Go), the two proteins were indistinguishable on PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. However, the large amount of complex glycan on the secreted form of TSHR-289 (14) could obscure loss of a few residues at the N- or C-termini.

The ability to separately purify the immunologically active and inactive forms of TSHR-289 permitted a more detailed analysis of these properties. Enzymatic deglycosylation with endoglycosidase F reduced the sizes of both active and inactive TSHR-289 from approximately 60 to 35 kDa, indicating similarity in their polypeptide cores and their degree of glycosylation (Fig. 4Go). However, this apparent similarity in polypeptide size does not exclude the loss of a few amino acids occurring either within the TSHR-289-expressing CHO cells or by proteolysis after secretion into the culture medium. Determination of the N-terminal amino acid sequences of purified, deglycosylated, immunologically active and inactive TSHR-289 indicated that they were identical (MGCSSPPCE; single amino acid code). Clipping at the C-terminus was excluded by the immunological integrity of the six-His tail on the inactive form of TSHR-289 as detected by the anti-His mAb (see below; Fig. 5Go). On this basis, an alteration in protein folding is the most likely explanation for the immunological difference between the two molecules.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Enzymatic deglycosylation of immunologically active and inactive TSHR-289 reveals similar polypeptide cores. Purified active (a) and inactive (i) TSHR-289 (10 µg/lane) before (-) and after (+) enzymatic deglycosylation with endoglycosidase F were subjected to PAGE (10%) under reducing conditions followed by Coomassie blue staining. To distinguish the TSHR-289 polypeptide chain from that of closely migrating endoglycosidase F, the latter alone is included in a separate lane. Note that affinity chromatography does not purify TSHR-289 (or many other proteins) to 100% purity, and contaminating minor bands, variable among different preparations are visible, particularly because of the very large amount of TSHR-289 applied per lane for recovery of the deglycosylated protein for amino acid sequencing.

 


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Inactive TSHR-289 is derived from the active form and is not synthesized as a separate molecule. Different sera (2 µL) immobilized on a nitrocellulose filter were assayed for their ability to bind to TSHR-289 using a [125I]anti-His detection system (see Materials and Methods). In addition to mAb 3BD10 and sera from two patients with Graves’ disease containing high levels of TSHR autoantibodies, as positive and negative controls we included mouse mAb A9 to the TSHR (17 ), a normal mouse serum and two human sera from individuals without thyroid disease. Note the different dilutions for the human and mouse sera, necessary because of the very low titer of TSHR autoantibody levels even in the most potent Graves’ sera. After incubation in either active TSHR-289, inactive TSHR-289, or active TSHR-289 (all precomplexed with [125I] anti-His) for 4 h at 37 C, filters were probed with [125I]anti-His and were then subjected to autoradiography. Where indicated, the active TSHR-289 was previously incubated for 4 h at 37 C.

 
A difference in protein folding could reflect the synthesis of two distinct forms of TSHR-289 or a postsecretion alteration in folding, perhaps explaining the lability of TSHR-289 in terms of recognition by TSHR autoantibodies. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we stressed the active form of TSHR-289 (4 h at 37 C) to determine whether the loss of recognition by autoantibodies would be associated with a reciprocal gain of recognition by mAb 3BD10. Indeed, using a [125I]anti-His detection system, mouse mAb 3BD10 preferentially recognized inactive TSHR-289, and its weak interaction with active TSHR-289 was enhanced when this antigen was subjected to a mild temperature increase (Fig. 5Go, upper panel). As a control, mouse mAb A9 did not display a major difference in recognition of the different forms of TSHR-289. Conversely, and more importantly, Graves’ sera recognized only active, but not inactive, TSHR-289, and recognition was markedly reduced after stressing TSHR-289 (37 C for 4 h; Fig. 5Go, lower panel). Sera from normal individuals recognized neither form of antigen. Note that these direct binding data are qualitative and require particularly potent sera. In contrast, the indirect TBI neutralization data (Fig. 3Go) are quantitative and much more sensitive and, therefore, are reproduced with numerous sera with varying potency.

Stabilization of TSHR-289 immunological activity using chemical chaperones

Previous data indicated that unpurified TSHR-289 in culture medium retained its immunological activity for many hours at 4 C, but this activity was lost within a few hours at 37 C (15). Unfortunately, this lability persisted even when active TSHR-289 was purified to near homogeneity with removal or reduction of contaminating, potentially modifying, enzymes or products. These data together with evidence that the primary amino acid structure of the inactive TSHR was intact, led us to search for agents and solutes that might stabilize the folding of the active form of TSHR-289. After incubation of purified, active TSHR-289 for 4 h in different agents, the ability of TSHR-289 to be recognized by autoantibodies in Graves’ serum was tested by reversal of the TBI activity (Table 1Go). Thus, a Graves’ serum chosen for intermediate potency reduced [125I]TSH binding to porcine holoreceptors to approximately 30% of that observed in the presence of serum from a normal individual (maximum binding). Active TSHR-289 maintained for 4 h at 4 C, but not at 37 C, reversed this TBI activity. Inclusion of trehalose, Tween-20, and glycerol in various combinations had no protective effect. In contrast, 2 mol/L proline and 2.5 mol/L TMAO, agents known to stabilize some proteins under environmental stress (18) completely preserved the immunological activity of TSHR-289 during the 4-h period at 37 C. Remarkably, both 2 mol/L proline and 2.5 mol/L TMAO stabilized the folding of the active form of TSHR-289 for up to 29 h at 37 C (Fig. 6Go). TMAO did not convert inactive TSHR-289 into its active form, nor could we restore activity by refolding after denaturation in guanidine or by treatment with protein disulfide isomerase (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Stabilization of the TSHR-289 immunological activity using chemical chaperones

 


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Chemical chaperone-maintained stability of immunologically active TSHR-289. Immunologically active TSHR-289 was maintained for periods of up to 29 h at 37 C in the presence or the absence of the indicated concentrations of proline or TMAO. The ability of TSHR-289 (12 ng/tube) to neutralize TSHR autoantibodies in a Graves’ patient serum was then assessed in the TBI assay. TSH binding in the presence of control serum from a normal individual is defined as 100%. The Graves’ serum in the experiment shown had the ability to inhibit TSH binding to porcine thyroid holoreceptors to approximately 30% of this value. The stippled area, therefore, represents neutralization of autoantibody activity.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Among the members of the glycoprotein hormone receptor family, the TSHR is unique in being the only one to which the immune system mounts a humoral response. In Graves’ disease, autoantibodies mimic the action of TSH and cause glandular hyperfunction. However, the unusual pathogenetic relevance of the TSHR is countered by the greater difficulty experienced over the past few decades in working with this molecule relative to the other glycoprotein hormone receptors (reviewed in Ref. 1). An important goal has been the generation of recombinant antigen for immunologic, diagnostic, and perhaps therapeutic studies in Graves’ disease. After disappointing results with a variety of expression systems (1), the focus has now shifted to the generation of large amounts of conformationally intact, mature TSHR antigen in mammalian cells. As mentioned above, different strategies are being developed by different groups (5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11). Our approach, which has the advantage of not requiring enzymatic release of cell-associated antigen, has been to overexpress in CHO cells a secreted form of the TSHR (TSHR-289) corresponding approximately to the A-subunit module (14). Although partially purified TSHR-289 was very potent in terms of autoantibody recognition, it proved to be heterogeneous, and we encountered major obstacles in isolating the active form of TSHR-289 by nickel-chelate chromatography or by mouse mAb affinity chromatography (15). None of numerous mAb generated to TSHR-289 recognized the immunologically active (vs. inactive) form of the molecule. However, in the present study we realized that one such mAb (3BD10) that recognizes primarily the inactive form of TSHR-289 could be used, in combination with a mAb to all forms of the molecule (anti-His), as a tool to separate and purify the immunologically active and inactive antigens. Both active and inactive TSHR-289 contain the identical primary amino acid structure and are highly glycosylated to a similar degree. It must be recognized, however, that our enzymatic deglycosylation data do not exclude the possibility of a subtle, qualitative difference in the carbohydrate structure of the active and inactive forms of TSHR-289. On the other hand, a difference in glycan composition is unlikely, because inactive TSHR-289 is derived from active TSHR-289 and is, therefore, not a separate synthetic product. Moreover, the 3BD10 epitope contains only a polypeptide chain. The polypeptide fragments used to map this epitope were expressed in bacteria and contain no carbohydrate (15). The difference between active and inactive TSHR-289, therefore, appears to involve a subtle alteration in protein folding.

The inactive form of TSHR-289 is not simply a denatured molecule. Thus, denaturation of inactive TSHR-289 leads to loss of mAb 3BD10 recognition (15). The 3BD10 epitope on inactive TSHR-289 is, therefore, conformational. This epitope has been mapped to a 27-amino acid, cysteine-rich segment at the extreme N-terminus of the TSHR ectodomain (residues 25–51; numbering includes the signal peptide) (15). Twenty-seven residues is larger than a typical antibody footprint (19). The inability of the mAb to interact with smaller polypeptide fragments (15) and the high cysteine content of the epitope suggest that besides being conformational, the epitope may also be discontinuous. From the perspective of the present study the most remarkable aspect of the 3BD10 epitope is that it overlaps with one component (amino acid residues 25–30) of the discontinuous epitope(s) for TSHR autoantibodies (3, 20). Reciprocal binding by 3BD10 and autoantibodies to conformational determinants involving the same amino acid residues in the TSHR raises the possibility of a prion-like shift between folded states of a native molecule. Prions are proteins synthesized by the same gene, containing identical amino acid sequences. A change in folding and conformation converts the normal, benign form into an infective pathogenic form (reviewed in Ref. 21). This analogy is not meant to imply that the TSHR can become infective, simply that it can convert from one native form to another.

An important observation in the present study was the ability to use cellular osmolytes, or chemical chaperones (reviewed in Ref. 18), to stabilize a labile molecule. Obviously, producing milligram quantities of purified TSHR antigen for future structural and immunological studies is of limited value if the material is unstable. Previously, we had been unable to stabilize the TSHR in terms of its autoantibody binding properties with a wide variety of proteolytic inhibitors. Among the commonly available molecular chaperones, we find that proline and TMAO, but not trehalose or glycerol, are effective. Of interest, to pursue the analogy with prions, chemical chaperones prevent the conversion of cellular prion protein to the pathogenic isoform, possibly by stabilizing the {alpha}-helical conformation of the former (22).

Besides providing the means to generate milligram quantities of purified, soluble, autoantibody-reactive TSHR antigen, the present study provides additional insight into TSHR structure and immunological properties. First, the direct sequence of purified TSHR-289 establishes unequivocally the signal peptide cleavage site. Second, the influence of a minor folding change on antibody recognition reinforces why previous studies using other forms of recombinant antigen, in particular peptides, were not very fruitful. Third, the potency of only a few nanograms of purified, active TSHR-289 in neutralizing TSHR autoantibodies in Graves’ sera emphasizes that the concentration of the latter is even lower than considered previously when a heterogeneous preparation of TSHR-289 was available (15). These quantitative neutralization data are consistent with previous immunohistochemical (23) and flow cytometry (24) data, indicating that in thyroid autoimmunity, TSHR autoantibody concentrations are 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than those of thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies (typically present in the same patient), an observation of possible pathogenetic significance (reviewed in Ref. 1).

Finally, an important future goal is to determine the three-dimensional structure of the TSHR ectodomain. Our studies indicate subtle folding heterogeneity in the TSHR-289 molecule that would be incompatible with this objective. Whether similar heterogeneity exists in TSHR preparations from other laboratories is unknown. However, our ability to separate different folded forms of the TSHR, generate large quantities of these molecules and maintain their stability, as well as expressing a smaller modular portion of the molecule rather than the entire ectodomain, improves the chances of obtaining crystals. Nevertheless, major hurdles remain, including the very high TSHR-289 glycan content. In addition, it is unknown how molar concentrations of the molecular chaperones necessary for the stabilization of TSHR-289 will affect crystal formation. However, even if crystallization of this very difficult molecule is never achieved, the generation of milligram quantities of purified, immunologically active, and stable antigen represents a major advance in the field and provides a powerful tool for future diagnostic and therapeutic studies.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. Scott Hutchison, Dean Segal, and Jack Stanners of Quest Diagnostics, Inc. (San Juan Capistrano, CA), for providing us with purified mAb 3BD10.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grant DK-19289. Back

Received September 12, 2000.

Revised November 14, 2000.

Accepted November 29, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM. 1998 The thyrotropin receptor: Interaction with thyrotropin and autoantibodies. Endocr Rev. 19:673–716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Nagayama Y, Wadsworth HL, Chazenbalk GD, Russo D, Seto P, Rapoport B. 1991 Thyrotropin-luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor extracellular domain chimeras as probes for TSH receptor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88:902–905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nagayama Y, Wadsworth HL, Russo D, Chazenbalk GD, Rapoport B. 1991 Binding domains of stimulatory and inhibitory thyrotropin (TSH) receptor autoantibodies determined with chimeric TSH-lutropin/chorionic gonadotropin receptors. J Clin Invest. 88:336–340.
  4. Misrahi M, Ghinea N, Sar S, et al. 1994 Processing of the precursors of the human thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor in various eukaryotic cells (human thyrocytes, transfected L cells and baculovirus-infected insect cells). Eur J Biochem. 222:711–719.[Medline]
  5. Matsuba T, Yamada M, Suzuki H, et al. 1995 Expression of recombinant human thyrotropin receptor in myeloma cells. J Biochem. 118:265–270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chazenbalk GD, Kakinuma A, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B. 1996 Evidence for negative cooperativity among human thyrotropin receptors overexpressed in mammalian cells. Endocrinology. 137:4586–4591.[Abstract]
  7. Minich WB, Loos U. 1999 Isolation of radiochemically pure 125I-labeled human thyrotropin receptor and its use for the detection of pathological autoantibodies in sera from Graves’ patients. J Endocrinol. 160:239–245.[Abstract]
  8. Costagliola S, Morgenthaler NG, Hoermann R, et al. 1999 Second generation assay for thyrotropin receptor antibodies has superior diagnostic sensitivity for Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:90–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Osuga Y, Liang S-G, Dallas JS, Wang C, Hsueh AJW. 1998 Soluble ecto-domain mutant of thyrotropin (TSH) receptor incapable of binding TSH neutralizes the action of thyroid- stimulating antibodies from Graves’ patients. Endocrinology. 139:671–676.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Da Costa CR, Johnstone AP. 1998 Production of the thyrotropin receptor extracellular domain as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane protein and its interaction with thyrotropin and autoantibodies. J Biol Chem. 273:11874–11880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Costagliola S, Khoo D, Vassart G. 1998 Production of bioactive amino-terminal domain of the thyrotropin receptor via insertion in the plasma membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor. FEBS Lett. 436:427–433.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Harfst E, Johnstone AP, Nussey SS. 1992 Characterization of the extracellular region of the human thyrotropin receptor expressed as a recombinant protein. J Mol Endocrinol. 9:227–236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rapoport B, McLachlan SM, Kakinuma A, Chazenbalk GD. 1996 Critical relationship between autoantibody recognition and TSH receptor maturation as reflected in the acquisition of mature carbohydrate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2525–2533.[Abstract]
  14. Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM, Rapoport B. 1997 Engineering the human thyrotropin receptor ectodomain from a non-secreted form to a secreted, highly immunoreactive glycoprotein that neutralizes autoantibodies in Graves’ patients’ sera. J Biol Chem. 272:18959–18965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Chazenbalk GD, Wang Y, Guo J, et al. 1999 A mouse monoclonal antibody to a thyrotropin receptor ectodomain variant provides insight into the exquisite antigenic conformational requirement, epitopes and in vivo concentration of human autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:702–710.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Shewring GA, Rees Smith B. 1982 An improved radioreceptor assay for TSH receptor antibodies. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 17:409–417.[Medline]
  17. Nicholson LB, Vlase H, Graves P, et al. 1996 Monoclonal antibodies to the human thyrotropin receptor: epitope mapping and binding to the native receptor on the basolateral plasma membrane of thyroid follicular cells. J Mol Endocrinol. 16:159–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Welch WJ, Brown CR. 1996 Influence of molecular and chemical chaperones on protein folding. Cell Stress Chaperones. 1:109–115.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Davies DR, Padlan EA, Sheriff S. 1990 Antibody-antigen complexes. Annu Rev Biochem. 59:439–473.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Nagayama Y, Rapoport B. 1992 Thyroid stimulatory autoantibodies in different patients with autoimmune thyroid disease do not all recognize the same components of the human thyrotropin receptor: selective role of receptor amino acids Ser25-Glu30. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:1425–1430.[Abstract]
  21. Prusiner SB. 1998 Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:13363–13383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Tatzelt J, Prusiner SB, Welch WJ. 1996 Chemical chaperones interfere with the formation of scrapie prion protein. EMBO J. 15:6363–6373.[Medline]
  23. De Forteza R, Smith CU, Amin J, McKenzie JM, Zakarija M. 1994 Visualization of the thyrotropin receptor on the cell surface by potent autoantibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:1271–1273.[Abstract]
  24. Jaume JC, Kakinuma A, Chazenbalk GD, Rapoport B, McLachlan SM. 1997 TSH receptor autoantibodies in serum are present at much lower concentrations than thyroid peroxidase autoantibodies: analysis by flow cytometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:500–507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. V. Misharin, Y. Nagayama, H. A. Aliesky, Y. Mizutori, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Attenuation of Induced Hyperthyroidism in Mice by Pretreatment with Thyrotropin Receptor Protein: Deviation of Thyroid-Stimulating to Nonfunctional Antibodies
Endocrinology, August 1, 2009; 150(8): 3944 - 3952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. V. Misharin, Y. Nagayama, H. A. Aliesky, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Studies in Mice Deficient for the Autoimmune Regulator (Aire) and Transgenic for the Thyrotropin Receptor Reveal a Role for Aire in Tolerance for Thyroid Autoantigens
Endocrinology, June 1, 2009; 150(6): 2948 - 2956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. Mizutori, C.-R. Chen, F. Latrofa, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Evidence that Shed Thyrotropin Receptor A Subunits Drive Affinity Maturation of Autoantibodies Causing Graves' Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2009; 94(3): 927 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
Y. Mizutori, C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
The Thyrotropin Receptor Hinge Region Is Not Simply a Scaffold for the Leucine-Rich Domain but Contributes to Ligand Binding and Signal Transduction
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1171 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Suppression of Thyrotropin Receptor Constitutive Activity by a Monoclonal Antibody with Inverse Agonist Activity
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2375 - 2382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. J. Land, P. Gudapati, M. H. Kaplan, and G. S. Seetharamaiah
Differential Requirement of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-4 (Stat4) and Stat6 in a Thyrotropin Receptor-289-Adenovirus-Induced Model of Graves' Hyperthyroidism
Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 111 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. N. Pichurin, C.-R. Chen, G. D. Chazenbalk, H. Aliesky, N. Pham, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Targeted Expression of the Human Thyrotropin Receptor A-Subunit to the Mouse Thyroid: Insight into Overcoming the Lack of Response to A-Subunit Adenovirus Immunization
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 668 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. M. McLachlan, Y. Nagayama, and B. Rapoport
Insight into Graves' Hyperthyroidism from Animal Models
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2005; 26(6): 800 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. N. Pichurin, G. D. Chazenbalk, H. Aliesky, O. Pichurina, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
"Hijacking" the Thyrotropin Receptor: A Chimeric Receptor-Lysosome Associated Membrane Protein Enhances Deoxyribonucleic Acid Vaccination and Induces Graves' Hyperthyroidism
Endocrinology, December 1, 2004; 145(12): 5504 - 5514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C.-R. Chen, H. Aliesky, P. N. Pichurin, Y. Nagayama, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Susceptibility Rather than Resistance to Hyperthyroidism Is Dominant in a Thyrotropin Receptor Adenovirus-Induced Animal Model of Graves' Disease as Revealed by BALB/c-C57BL/6 Hybrid Mice
Endocrinology, November 1, 2004; 145(11): 4927 - 4933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Latrofa, G. D. Chazenbalk, P. Pichurin, C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Affinity-Enrichment of Thyrotropin Receptor Autoantibodies from Graves' Patients and Normal Individuals Provides Insight into Their Properties and Possible Origin from Natural Antibodies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 4734 - 4745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Nagayama, K. Watanabe, M. Niwa, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Schistosoma mansoni and {alpha}-Galactosylceramide: Prophylactic Effect of Th1 Immune Suppression in a Mouse Model of Graves' Hyperthyroidism
J. Immunol., August 1, 2004; 173(3): 2167 - 2173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. D. Chazenbalk, F. Latrofa, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Thyroid Stimulation Does Not Require Antibodies with Identical Epitopes But Does Involve Recognition of a Critical Conformation at the N Terminus of the Thyrotropin Receptor A-Subunit
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1788 - 1793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. N. Pichurin, O. Pichurina, R. C. Marians, C.-R. Chen, Terry. F. Davies, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Thyrotropin Receptor Knockout Mice: Studies on Immunological Tolerance to a Major Thyroid Autoantigen
Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1294 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Van Sande, M. J. Costa, C. Massart, S. Swillens, S. Costagliola, J. Orgiazzi, and J. E. Dumont
Kinetics of Thyrotropin-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) and Thyroid-Stimulating Antibody Binding and Action on the TSH Receptor in Intact TSH Receptor-Expressing CHO Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5366 - 5374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Schwarz-Lauer, P. N. Pichurin, C.-R. Chen, Y. Nagayama, C. Paras, J. C. Morris, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
The Cysteine-Rich Amino Terminus of the Thyrotropin Receptor Is the Immunodominant Linear Antibody Epitope in Mice Immunized Using Naked Deoxyribonucleic Acid or Adenovirus Vectors
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 1718 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Nagayama, H. Mizuguchi, T. Hayakawa, M. Niwa, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Prevention of Autoantibody-Mediated Graves'-Like Hyperthyroidism in Mice with IL-4, a Th2 Cytokine
J. Immunol., April 1, 2003; 170(7): 3522 - 3527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Kalafatis, P. Simioni, D. Tormene, D. O. Beck, S. Luni, and A. Girolami
Isolation and characterization of an antifactor V antibody causing activated protein C resistance from a patient with severe thrombotic manifestations
Blood, May 13, 2002; 99(11): 3985 - 3992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Pichurin, O. Pichurina, G. D. Chazenbalk, C. Paras, C.-R. Chen, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Immune Deviation Away from Th1 in Interferon-{gamma} Knockout Mice Does Not Enhance TSH Receptor Antibody Production after Naked DNA Vaccination
Endocrinology, April 1, 2002; 143(4): 1182 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Pichurin, X.-M. Yan, L. Farilla, J. Guo, G. D. Chazenbalk, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Naked TSH Receptor DNA Vaccination: A TH1 T Cell Response in Which Interferon-{gamma} Production, Rather than Antibody, Dominates the Immune Response in Mice
Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3530 - 3536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chazenbalk, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chazenbalk, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Rapoport, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals