help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lassarre, C.
Right arrow Articles by Binoux, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lassarre, C.
Right arrow Articles by Binoux, M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 3 1260-1266
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Measurement of Intact Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 in Human Plasma Using a Ligand Immunofunctional Assay1

Claudine Lassarre and Michel Binoux

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 515, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris VI, Paris, France

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Michel Binoux, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité, 515, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184, rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75571 Paris Cedex 12, France. E-mail: U515{at}st-antoine.inserm.fr


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Limited proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) is a fundamental mechanism in the regulation of IGF-I bioavailability in the bloodstream. Its measurement by Western immunoblotting provides only semiquantitative estimation. We have developed a ligand immunofunctional assay (LIFA) for quantifying human (h) intact IGFBP-3 in biological fluids.

IGFBP-bound IGFs are dissociated and separated by acid pH ultrafiltration, and a monoclonal antibody specific to the first 160 amino acids of IGFBP-3 is used to capture hIGFBP-3 in a solid-phase assay. The complex is then incubated with 125I-IGF-I, which binds to intact IGFBP-3 but not to its proteolytic fragments. Binding specificity was demonstrated in competition experiments with unlabeled IGF. Nonspecific binding was 1.4%. The fragments comprising residues 1–160 and 1–95 of recombinant hIGFBP-3 [corresponding to the major proteolytic fragments of approximately 30 kDa and (glycosylated) 20 or (nonglycosylated) 16 kDa detected in serum by Western immunoblotting, respectively] fail to bind 125I-IGF-I when complexed with the monoclonal antibody. Similarly, no binding of 125I-IGF-I was obtained in the LIFA when applied to plasmas from pregnant women during the final 3 months of pregnancy, where the characteristic 42- to 39-kDa doublet of intact IGFBP-3 is undetectable.

The standard curve was established using a pool of plasmas (EDTA) from healthy adults, for which standardization with glycosylated recombinant hIGFBP-3 yielded an intact IGFBP-3 content of 2 µg/mL. The dynamic range of the LIFA was 0.50–3.75 µL equivalent of the plasma pool in a total volume of 300 µL per assay tube, with a sensitivity threshold of approximately 1 ng intact IGFBP-3. Unknown plasma samples were studied at three concentrations. Intra- and interassay variations were 3.6% and 4%, respectively.

In 31 healthy adults, the mean plasma concentration of intact IGFBP-3 was 2.24 ± 0.08 (SEM) mg/L, and that of total IGFBP-3 measured by immunoradiometric assay was 3.27 ± 0.14 mg/L. The calculated mean proportion of proteolysed IGFBP-3 was 29.4 ± 1.9%. In these subjects, a close correlation was found between intact and total IGFBP-3 (r = 0.71, P = 0.0001).

The LIFA for IGFBP-3, therefore, provides accurate and sensitive measurement of intact IGFBP-3, the form with the functional capacity to sequester IGF-I in the bloodstream by association with the acid-labile subunit in 140-kDa complexes. In combination with total IGFBP-3 and IGF-I assays, the LIFA opens new perspectives in investigating the regulation of IGFBP-3 proteolysis and IGF-I bioavailability in man.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN THE BLOODSTREAM, at least 80% of insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and -II) bind to IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), which associates with the acid-labile subunit to form 140-kDa ternary complexes. These fail to cross the capillary epithelium and have a half-life of about 12 h (1). Release of IGFs from this circulating reservoir is modulated by serine protease-induced proteolysis of IGFBP-3, which then loses affinity for IGFs, and particularly IGF-I (2, 3). Dissociation of the 140-kDa complexes is thereby facilitated and the IGFs are redistributed towards the 40-kDa binary IGFBP-IGF complexes and the free fraction of IGF-I (3, 4). The result is increased IGF bioavailability to the target tissues (5).

This limited proteolysis was first discovered in pregnant women, where virtually all circulating IGFBP-3 is degraded as from the third month of gestation (2, 6). It occurs to a more moderate extent in the normal physiological state and may be more or less marked in pathological conditions where catabolism in enhanced (1, 7). The proteases and their inhibitors involved and their tissual origins remain obscure. The IGFBP-3 protease activity of normal serum, apart from during pregnancy, is discrete (8), but Western immunoblotting of serum IGFBP-3 consistently reveals proteolytic fragments (8, 9) and indicates variations in their relative abundance in different physiological conditions (7).

In serum or culture media conditioned by various cell types, limited proteolysis of IGFBP-3 generates a major fragment of 30 kDa and smaller quantities of fragments around 20 and 16 kDa (Refs. 10, 11 ; see Fig. 1Go). The 30-kDa fragment, which has only weak affinity for the IGFs and especially IGF-I (3, 14), corresponds to the first 160 amino acid residues of the intact protein. The 20-kDa fragment arises from secondary cleavage of the major fragment and corresponds to the first 95 residues. The 16-kDa fragment, which corresponds to the same sequence, is the nonglycosylated form of the 20-kDa peptide (15). These 1–95 fragments have null affinity for IGFs in Western ligand blotting and in solution assay (14).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Detection of IGFBP-3 and its proteolytic fragments by the anti-IGFBP-3 mAb used in the IGFBP-3 LIFA. Left, Western blot analysis of IGFBPs in a pool of plasmas from healthy adults (reference plasma). Following SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose, the IGFBPs were identified using a mixture of 125I-IGF-I and -II. IGFBP-3 and it proteolytic fragments were detected by immunoblotting (12 13 ). Right, Immunoblot analysis of nonglycosylated rhIGFBP-3 and the proteolytic fragments generated in vitro by plasmin and isolated by reverse-phase chromatography (14 ). The arrows indicate which glycosylated forms (plasma IGFBP-3) correspond to the nonglycosylated forms (rhIGFBP-3). Bottom, Schematic representation of the proteolytic cleavage sites of rhIGFBP-3 by plasmin (from Ref. 15). N-terminal amino acid sequencing has shown that the 22 to 25-kDa material corresponds mostly to 1–160 fragments, whereas the 16-kDa material contains mainly 1–95 fragments. The C-terminal 161–264 fragment is not recognized by the anti-IGFBP-3 antibodies used. The glycosylation sites (Asn 89, 109, and 172) and the approximate masses of the carbohydrate moieties of native IGFBP-3 are also shown (from Ref. 16).

 
The RIAs and immunoradiometric assays (IRMAs) currently in use to measure IGFBP-3 make no distinction between the intact and proteolysed forms. Consequently, they do not reflect the concentration of IGFBP-3 capable of sequestering IGFs in the bloodstream. Khosravi et al. (17) recently developed an assay in which the IGFBP-3-IGF-I complex is captured by an anti-IGFBP-3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and then detected using an anti-IGF-I mAb. In the same line of research on the physiology of the 140-kDa complexes, we applied a different approach, aiming specifically to measure intact IGFBP-3. We, therefore, established a ligand immunofunctional assay (LIFA), by which intact and proteolysed IGFBP-3 are captured by a mAb, then detected in the presence of radiolabeled IGF-I, which binds only to intact IGFBP-3.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Peptides and antibodies

Recombinant human IGF-I and -II (rhIGF-I and -II) were gifts from Ciba-Geigy (Basel, Switzerland). The peptides were labeled with 125I (Amersham Aylesbury, UK) using the chloramine T method and purified by gel filtration. Nonglycosylated rhIGFBP-3 (Escherichia coli) and glycosylated rhIGFBP-3 (CHO) were generous gifts from Celtrix Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Santa Clara, CA).

Limited proteolysis of rhIGFBP-3 (E. coli) by plasmin and isolation of the fragments corresponding to residues 1–160 and 1–95 by reverse-phase chromatography were performed as described previously (14, 15).

The polyclonal anti-hIGF-I antibody used for the IGF-I RIA was a gift from F. Frankenne (Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire, Liège, Belgium). The specific rabbit anti-rhIGFBP-3 (E. coli) antiserum used in Western immunoblotting was raised in our laboratory. The mouse monoclonal anti-hIGFBP-3 antibody [mAb 483.6E8; 2.93 mg/mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4)] used in the LIFA for IGFBP-3 was generously provided by Biocode (Sclessin, Belgium).

All other chemical reagents used were of analytical grade purity.

Plasma samples

Plasma samples were obtained from fasting subjects between 0800 and0900 h. Blood was collected in tubes containing an EDTA solution (5 µmol/mL blood), on ice. These were centrifuged at 4C, and plasma samples were stored at -20C.

The subjects, all adults, were: 1) thirty-one healthy volunteers (21 women, none using oral contraceptives, and 10 men) aged 20–39 yr (mean, 29); a plasma pool ("reference plasma") was made up from equal-volume aliquots from 10 of these women and the 10 men; IGF-I levels were all in the normal range (data not shown); 2) twenty-six healthy pregnant women, at 22–39 weeks gestation, from whom samples were taken during routine check-ups in the Obstetrics Department of Saint Antoine Hospital; and 3) untreated patients with idiopathic GH deficiency or acromegaly, whose plasma samples were tested individually for comparison with the reference plasma, in view of the GH dependence of both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 plasma levels.

All blood samples were collected according the the rules of the hospital Ethics Committee, as required by French law.

Dissociation and separation of plasma IGFs and IGFBPs

IGFBP-IGF complexes were dissociated in acid medium, and their components were separated by ultrafiltration as described previously (18). Briefly, 25-µL plasma samples were incubated in 2 mL 0.01 M HCl for 30 min at room temperature, then ultrafiltered on Centricon 30 columns (Amicon, Epernon, France). Following filtration, the columns were washed with 2 mL of the HCl solution to ensure complete passage of ultrafiltered proteins. Close to 100% of 125-I-IGF-I and -II mixed with plasma sample was recovered in the ultrafiltrate. Western ligand blotting and immunoblotting using anti-IGFBP-3 antibody demonstrated that all IGFBPs, including intact IGFBP-3 and its proteolytic fragments, present in the plasma sample remained in the retentate (data not shown).

LIFA for IGFBP-3

The assay was performed in Maxisorp tubes (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) coated for 2 days at room temperature with 1.4 µg/tube anti-hIGFBP-3 mAb in 500 µL 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.2) and 1 mg/mL NaN3. After washing, the tubes were saturated overnight at room temperature with 3 mg BSA in 1 mL PBS, then stored at 4C until use for the assay.

For each assay, an aliquot of the reference plasma was subjected to ultrafiltration on Centricon 30 under the same conditions as the unknown sample. An internal standard consisting of a known plasma sample was also run in each assay.

The retentate containing the IGFBPs was taken up in 50 µL 0.1 M acetic acid, then neutralized with 50 µL 0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and made up to 2 mL with 0.1 M phosphate buffer and 1 mg/mL BSA (pH 7.4; PO4BSA). Duplicate aliquots, each corresponding to an initial 3.75 µL plasma, were incubated at three concentrations (four for the reference plasma), dilution factor: 2, in 300 µL (total volume) PO4BSA in the anti-hIGFBP-3 mAb-coated tubes for 3 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the incubation medium was sucked out and the tubes were washed with 1 mL PO4BSA, then incubated with 10,000 cpm 125I-IGF-I in 300 µL PO4BSA for 24 h at 4C. After aspiration of the contents and washing with PO4BSA, the tubes were counted in a gamma spectrometer.

IRMA for IGFBP-3

IRMA was performed using an IGFBP-3 IRMA kit (Immunotech, Marseille, France). The mAb pool used specifically detects IGFBP-3 and its N-terminal proteolytic fragments, as confirmed by Western immunoblotting (data not shown). Each plasma sample was tested at two concentrations (0.25 and 0.50 µL) in a total volume of 450 µL per assay tube. The sensitivity threshold was 0.05 µg/mL plasma. The intra-assay variation was close to 5%, and the interassay variation was 10%.

Western ligand blotting and immunoblotting

IGFBPs were analyzed by methods routinely used in the laboratory and derived from those described previously (12, 13). After separation of the plasma proteins by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions and transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, the various IGFBPs were detected by incubation with their ligands (a mixture of 125I-IGF-I and -II). In immunoblotting, IGFBP-3 was detected using either the specific polyclonal Ab or the mAb used for the LIFA. The complexes were revealed using antibodies coupled to horseradish peroxidase in the Amersham enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection system.

Statistics

Conventional methods were used to determine the means (±SEM), intra- and interassay coefficients of variation, and linear regression analyses.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The basic premise of the method (hence, the name "LIFA" for intact IGFBP-3) comprises binding of intact and proteolyzed IGFBP-3 (following separation from IGFs at acidic pH) to a specific mAb coated to the assay tubes, then specific and quantitative detection of intact IGFBP-3 using 125I-IGF-I, which does not bind to the proteolytic fragments. The validity of the assay is based on the experimental results presented below.

Specificity

The IGFBP-3 mAb used is specific for human IGFBP-3. Figure 1Go shows that in Western immunoblotting it recognizes intact (1–264) IGFBP-3 and its 1–160 and 1–95 fragments either present in plasma or obtained in vitro from rhIGFBP-3 (E. coli) submitted to the action of plasmin and isolated by high-performance liquid chromatography (14, 15). This mAb does not recognize the 161–264 fragment. The lack of cross-reaction of the IGFBP-3 mAb with either rhIGFBP-1 or rhIGFBP-2 was confirmed by liquid phase assays; with IGFBP-5, by Western immunoblotting; and with native human IGFBP-4 and -6, by immunoblot analysis of media conditioned by human cell lines and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively (data not shown).

IGFBP-3 binding to the mAb on the test tube walls does not mask its IGF-I-binding sites. The saturable and reversible nature of ligand binding was demonstrated by competitive binding experiments between radiolabeled and unlabeled IGF-I. An example is shown in Fig. 2Go, where plasma extracts from a healthy adult and an acromegalic patient were tested in the same experiment. On average, nonspecific binding of 125I-IGF-I to tubes not coated with antibody was 1.4%.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Competitive inhibition by IGF-I of 125I-IGF-I binding to human plasma IGFBP-3 captured by anti-IGFBP-3 mAb adsorbed to the test tube walls. Plasma IGFBPs were first separated from IGFs by acid pH ultrafiltration (see Materials and Methods). A two-microliter equivalent of plasma were added to each tube (in duplicate). The percentages of 125I-IGF-I bound (B) in the absence of added IGF-I (B0) were 40% (untreated acromegalic patient) and 30% (normal adult).

 
IGF-I binds exclusively to intact IGFBP-3. Figure 3Go shows the dose-response curve obtained in the presence of increasing concentrations of rhIGFBP-3. Under the same conditions, 125I-IGF-I fails to bind to the 1–160 and 1–95 fragments. This loss of affinity was confirmed in studies of pregnant women where 125I-IGF-I binding measured by the LIFA was either extremely weak or absent (Fig. 4Go and Table 1Go). This reflects the more or less complete disappearance of the intact form of IGFBP-3 beyond the fourth week of gestation owing to intense protease activity (2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Binding of 125I-IGF-I to increasing amounts of nonglycosylated rhIGFBP-3 captured by anti-IGFBP-3 mAb adsorbed to the test tube walls (see Materials and Methods). The proteolytic fragments of IGFBP-3 generated by plasmin and detected by Western immunoblotting (see Fig. 1Go) fail to bind labeled IGF-I.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Functional alteration of IGFBP3 during pregnancy. Plasma samples were taken from a pregnant woman at weeks 4, 18, and 34 of gestation. After the fourth week, virtually all circulating IGFBP-3 has undergone limited proteolysis, resulting in a loss of affinity for IGFs (2 3 6 ). This is evident in Western ligand blotting, where the characteristic 42 to 39-kDa doublet corresponding to intact IGFBP-3 disappears, and in immunoblotting, which reveals the proteolytic fragments in addition to the intact protein. The functional alteration is also demonstrated in the LIFA by the near (18 weeks) or total (34 weeks) lack of binding between 125I-IGF-I and plasma IGFBP-3 captured by the anti-IGFBP-3 mAb on the test tube walls.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Plasma IGF-I, total IGFBP-3, and intact IGFBP-3 in 26 pregnant women at 22–39 weeks gestation

 
Dose-response curves

The standard curve used for the IGFBP-3 LIFA was established using the reference preparation comprising the pool of plasmas from healthy adults and containing 2.9 µg/mL total IGFBP-3 as measured by IRMA (see Materials and Methods). Measurements of bound 125I-IGF-I (percentage of total counts) as a function of the log of the intact IGFBP-3 concentration yielded approximately linear responses for quantities between 0.47- and 3.75-µL equivalent of plasma in a total volume of 300 µL per assay tube. Figure 5Go, which shows a representative assay, also shows the dose-response curves for plasma samples from an acromegalic patient (5.7 µg/mL total IGFBP-3) and a GH-deficient patient (1.4 µg/mL total IGFBP-3). The maximum quantities used per assay tube were 1.9- and 5- µL equivalent, respectively. Parallelism with reference curve is quite evident.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Typical example of the dose-response curves obtained for plasma samples from untreated acromegalic and GH-deficient patients, showing the parallelism with that for the reference plasma (a pool of plasma from healthy adults). For each assay, an aliquot of the pool and the unknown samples were first subjected to acid pH ultrafiltration to dissociate and separate IGFBP-bound IGFs. The concentration of intact IGFBP-3 in unknown samples was determined in the solid-phase assay by measuring the proportions of 125I-IGF-I bound to mAb-IGFBP-3 complex as compared with those in the reference preparation.

 
In view of the 1.4% nonspecific binding (see above), the lowest detectable concentration of IGFBP-3 measurable by this assay corresponds to 0.4 µL of the normal plasma pool (i.e. approximately 1 ng intact IGFBP-3).

Expression of the results

The intact IGFBP-3 concentration of the reference plasma was calculated on the basis of a standard curve obtained with glycosylated rhIGFBP-3 (CHO). It was estimated at 2 µg/mL. Intact IGFBP-3 concentrations of unknown samples were calculated as percentages of that of the reference plasma, then as mg/L on the basis of the estimation above.

In the 31 healthy adults sampled for this study (see Materials and Methods), good correlation was found between intact and total IGFBP-3 concentrations (Fig. 6Go): r = 0.71, P = 0.0001. The mean concentrations of intact and total IGFBP-3 were 2.24 ± 0.08 (SEM) and 3.27 ± 0.14 mg/L, respectively. The mean proportion of proteolysed IGFBP-3 [(total IGFBP-3- intact IGFBP-3/total IGFBP-3) x 100] for these subjects was 29.4 ± 1.9%.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Correlation between plasma concentrations of intact IGFBP-3 measured by LIFA and total IGFBP-3 measured by IRMA in healthy adults. The concentrations of intact IGFBP-3 in unknown samples were determined by comparison with that in the reference plasma standardized against glycosylated rhIGFBP-3.

 
Recovery

Recovery was determined using known concentrations of rhIGFBP-3 incubated in triplicate in mAb-coated tubes and measurement on the standard curves. These concentrations were 5, 10, 20, and 40 ng per 300 µL, the highest corresponding to twice the concentration obtained from 2.5-µL equivalent of a plasma containing 8 mg/L total IGFBP-3 (the maximum level in an acromegalic patient). Recovery rates were 81%, 83%, 83%, and 84%, respectively.

Accuracy

The intra-assay variation, determined using the same plasma sample ultrafiltered on five different Centricon columns then measured by the LIFA, was 3.6%.

The interassay variation, determined using four different plasma pools, each sampled seven times, fell between 2% and 8% (mean, 4%).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The LIFA described here provides for specific quantification of intact IGFBP-3 in plasma. The mAb used is specific for IGFBP-3 and fails to cross-react with other IGFBPs. Like the polyclonal antibodies used in this and other laboratories (8, 9, 10), in Western immunoblotting it recognizes the major 30-kDa proteolytic fragment and the minor 20-kDa (glycosylated) and 16-kDa (nonglycosylated) fragments that, for the most part, correspond to the N-terminal 160 and 95 residues of the protein, respectively (15). The C-terminal fragment resulting from the initial enzymatic cleavage, which is not recognized by polyclonal antibodies (15), is not recognized by this antibody either.

In this solid phase assay, binding of IGFBP-3 (whether native glycosylated or recombinant glycosylated or nonglycosylated) to the mAb adsorbed to the test tube wall does not mask its IGF-I-binding sites. IGF binding was specific and reversible. Nonspecific binding was below 2%.

For analysis of plasma samples, the indispensable first step of dissociating the IGFBP-IGF-I or -II complexes in acid medium and separating IGFs and IGFBPs by ultrafiltration provides the advantage of simultaneously measuring IGF-I by RIA (18) and intact IGFBP-3 by LIFA. The 1–160 and 1–95 fragments obtained by plasmin-induced proteolysis of rhIGFBP-3 do not bind 125I-IGF-I when coupled with the mAb on the test tube wall. In Western ligand blotting and liquid phase binding experiments, neither IGF-I nor IGF-II binds to the 1–95 fragment (14). This agrees with recent results from biosensor analyses indicating a 1000-fold reduced affinity compared with intact IGFBP-3 (19). The 1–160 fragment retains residual affinity for IGF-I, estimated at one tenth (plasma IGFBP-3) and one fiftieth (rhIGFBP-3) of that of intact IGFBP-3 (3, 14). The total loss of affinity of the 1–160 peptide in the solid phase assay may reflect conformation changes. The lack of affinity for IGF-I of the N-terminal IGFBP-3 fragments was confirmed by analysis of pregnancy plasmas where there was consistently no or extremely weak binding to 125I-IGF-I at times when intact IGFBP-3 is not detectable by Western ligand and immunoblotting.

Recovery determined using known quantities of rhIGFBP-3 was close to 80% and independent of the concentration tested. This was not taken into account in the calculations of intact IGFBP-3 measured, because the concentrations were estimated in comparison with the reference plasma preparation treated in the same way as the unknown samples in each assay and calibrated on the basis of glycosylated rhIGFBP-3.

The intra-assay variability (3.6%) and interassay variability (below 10%) were of the order of magnitude required for an immunoassay, in particular that for total IGFBP-3. The accuracy of the LIFA for intact IGFBP-3 is well above that of the semiquantitative estimations obtained from densitometry scanning of immunoblots. In our hands, the (quantitative) reproducibility of immunoblots is disappointing, yielding 20–50% variations even with analysis of samples in duplicate or at two concentrations.

The sensitivity of the LIFA (0.4 µL of the normal plasma pool corresponding to 1 ng intact IGFBP-3) is also much greater than that of Western immunoblotting (approximately 2 µL of the same pool on a standard gel). This means that the LIFA will be applicable to measurement of intact IGFBP-3 in other biological fluids and/or cell culture media without prior concentration.

The physiological relevance of the IGFBP-3 LIFA is that it detects only the intact form that has the functional ability to bind IGF-I. Used in combination with the classical RIA or IRMA for total IGFBP-3, which indiscriminately measures the intact and proteolyzed forms, the proportions of proteolyzed IGFBP-3 can be quantified. This also provides a means of studying the regulation of IGFBP-3 proteolysis under normal and pathological conditions.

The correlation observed between intact and total IGFBP-3 concentrations in plasma samples from healthy adults shows that IGFBP-3 proteolysis is tightly regulated. Our results indicate that in the normal state approximately 30% of the IGFBP-3 analyzed in the bloodstream has undergone proteolysis. This is within the order of magnitude of estimations obtained from densitometry scanning of Western immunoblots (20). However, it does not concord with data from protease activity measurements using 125I-IGFBP-3 as substrate (21), where in the normal state (apart from during pregnancy) there is virtually no IGFBP-3 proteolytic activity in serum (8). Nevertheless, our occasional observation of increased proportions of proteolyzed IGFBP-3 in serum samples stored at -20C for several months points toward residual proteolytic activity in serum. For this reason, all plasmas tested in the present study were obtained from blood samples collected in tubes containing EDTA and on ice.

From studies of a variety of cell models (22), it seems likely that IGFBP-3 proteolysis occurs either in the environment of IGFBP-3-producing cells, or on contact with the vascular endothelium and/or via the action of tissue proteases that are rapidly inactivated in the blood. Our observation that proteolytic activity in lymph is almost eight times that in serum (8) would support the notion of tissual proteases. The proportion of proteolyzed IGFBP-3 is markedly larger in catabolic states, such as in patients with severe illness (23) or after surgery (24). The virtual disappearance of intact IGFBP-3 during the last three months of pregnancy reflects extreme physiological conditions, when the extensive proteolysis of IGFBP-3 associated with elevated IGF-I levels leads to enhanced IGF-I availability to the tissues (3, 4, 5) in response to increased metabolic needs and relative insulin resistance (25). The enhanced IGF-I bioavailability could account for the decrease in insulin requirement that is not uncommon in well-controlled type1 diabetic women (26). It could also explain the increased incidence of hypoglycemic episodes in these patients during the first half of pregnancy (27), interpreted as being partly related to transitionally increased insulin sensitivity (28). A recent study suggests that the main IGFBP-3 protease activity in pregnancy serum is due to a trophoblast-derived protease (29).

The IGF-I that dissociates from the 140-kDa complexes when IGFBP-3 is cleaved either associates with other IGFBPs in the 40-kDa complexes or circulates in free forms (3, 4). Calculation of the ratio of total IGF-I concentration to intact IGFBP-3 would, therefore, provide an index of the exchangeable fraction of IGF-I bound to IGFBP-3. This may have clinical significance considering the results of epidemiological studies revealing a link between IGF-I levels and prostate or breast cancer risk (30, 31). Determination of this ratio would constitute a different but complementary approach vis-à-vis the measurement of free IGF-I that is already in use in clinical investigation (32, 33). In our next study, we describe possible application of the IGFBP-3 LIFA to study of the regulation of IGFBP-3 proteolysis and IGF-I bioavailability in an analysis of physiological and pathological conditions comprising abnormalities of GH secretion or insulin deficiency and/or resistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported by the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale and a grant from Institut Lilly-Alfediam. Back

Received July 21, 2000.

Revised November 14, 2000.

Accepted December 6, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rajaram S, Baylink DJ, Mohan S. 1997 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in serum and other biological fluids: regulation and functions. Endocr Rev. 18:801–831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hossenlopp P, Segovia B, Lassarre C, Roghani M, Bredon M, Binoux M. 1990 Evidence of enzymatic degradation of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in the "150 K" complex during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 71:797–805.[Abstract]
  3. Lassarre C, Binoux M. 1994 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 is functionally altered in pregnancy plasma. Endocrinology. 134:1254–1262.[Abstract]
  4. Hasegawa T, Hasegawa Y, Takada M, Tsuchiya Y. 1995 The free form of insulin-like growth factor I increases in circulation during normal human pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3284–3286.[Abstract]
  5. Blat C, Villaudy J, Binoux M. 1994 In vivo proteolysis of serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 results in increased availability of IGF to target cells. J Clin Invest. 93:2286–2290.
  6. Giudice LC, Farrell EM, Pham H, Lamson G, Rosenfeld RG. 1990 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in maternal serum throughout gestation and in the puerperium: effects of a pregnancy-associated serum protease activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 71:806–816.[Abstract]
  7. Maile L, Brown AL, Holly JMP. 1999 IGF binding protein proteolysis in various clinical states. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc. 633–649.
  8. Lalou C, Binoux M. 1993 Evidence that limited proteolysis of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) occurs in the normal state outside of the bloodstream. Regul Pept. 48:179–188.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Gargosky SE, Pham HM, Wilson KF, Liu F, Giudice LC, Rosenfeld RG. 1992 Measurement and characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in human biological fluids: discrepancies between radioimmunoassay and ligand blotting. Endocrinology. 131:3051–3060.[Abstract]
  10. Lalou C, Silve C, Rosato R, Segovia B, Binoux M. 1994 Interactions between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the system of plasminogen activators and their inhibitors in the control of IGF binding protein-3 production and proteolysis in human osteosarcoma cells. Endocrinology. 135:2318–2326.[Abstract]
  11. Binoux M, Lalou C, Mohseni-Zadeh S. 1999 Biological actions of proteolytic fragments of IGF binding proteins. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT (eds.) The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc. 281–313.
  12. Hossenlopp P, Seurin D, Segovia-Quinson B, Hardouin S, Binoux M. 1986 Analysis of serum insulin-like growth factor binding proteins using Western Blotting: use of the method for titration of the binding proteins and competitive binding studies. Anal Biochem. 154:138–143.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hossenlopp P, Binoux M. 1994 Use of peptide ligands for the detection of binding proteins by Western Ligand blotting. In: Dunbar BS, ed. Protein blotting: a practical approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 169–186.
  14. Lalou C, Lassarre C, Binoux M. 1996 A proteolytic fragment of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 that fails to bind IGFs inhibits the mitogenic effects of IGF-I and insulin. Endocrinology. 137:3206–3212.[Abstract]
  15. Lalou C, Sawamura S, Segovia B, Ogawa Y, Binoux M. 1997 Proteolytic fragments of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3: N-terminal sequences and relationships between structure and biological activity. C R Acad Sci Paris/Life Sciences. 32:621–628.
  16. Firth SM, Baxter RC. 1995 The role of glycosylation in the action of IGFBP-3. Prog Growth Factor Res. 6:223–229.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Khosravi J, Diamandi A, Mistry J, Krishna RG. 1999 The high molecular weight insulin-like growth factor-binding protein complex: epitope mapping, immunoassay and preliminary clinical evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:2826–2833.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gay E, Seurin D, Babajko S, Doublier S, Cazillis M, Binoux M. 1997 Liver-specific expression of human insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in transgenic mice: repercussions on reproduction, ante- and perinatal mortality and post-natal growth. Endocrinology. 138:2937–2947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Shymko RM, Hohmann B, Vorwerk P. 1999 Biosensor analysis of insulin-like growth factor/insulin-like growth factor binding protein interactions. 5th Int Symp IGFs, Brighton UK, Growth Hormone and IGF Research 9:323 (OC12.6).
  20. Lassarre C, Lalou C, Perin L, Binoux M. 1994 Protease-induced alteration of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 as detected by radioimmunoassay. Agreement with ligand blotting data. Growth Reg. 4:48–55.[Medline]
  21. Lamson G, Giudice LC, Rosenfeld RG. 1991 A simple assay for proteolysis of IGFBP-3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:1391–1393.[Abstract]
  22. Conover CA. 1999 Post-translational modification of the IGF binding proteins. In: Rosenfeld RG, Roberts Jr CT, eds. The IGF system: molecular biology, physiology and clinical applications. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc. 335–376.
  23. Davies SC, Wass JAH, Ross RJM, et al. 1991 Induction of a specific protease for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in the circulation during severe illness. J Endocrinol. 130:469–473.[Abstract]
  24. Davenport ML, Isley WL, Pucilowska JB, et al. 1992 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 proteolysis is induced after elective surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:590–595.[Abstract]
  25. Puavilai G, Drobny EC, Domont LA, Baumann G. 1982 Insulin receptors and insulin resistance in human pregnancy: evidence for a post-receptor defect in insulin action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 54:247–253.[Abstract]
  26. McManus RM, Ryan ED. 1992 Insulin requirements in insulin-dependent and insulin-requiring GDM women during final month of pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 15:1323–1327.[Abstract]
  27. Kimmerle R, Heinemann L, Delecki A, Berger M. 1992 Severe hypoglycemia incidence and predisposing factors in 85 pregnancies of type 1 diabetic women. Diabetes Care. 15:1034–1037.[Abstract]
  28. Kalkhoff RK, Kissebah AH, Kim HJ. 1978 Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism during normal pregnancy: relationship to gestational hormone action. Semin Perinatol. 2:291–307.[Medline]
  29. Irwin JC, Suen L-F, Cheng B-H, et al. 2000 Human placental trophoplasts secrete a disintegrin metalloproteinase very similar to the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 protease in human pregnancy serum. Endocrinology. 141:666–674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al. 1998 Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study. Science. 279:563–566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al. 1998 Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet. 351:1393–1396.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Frystyk J, Skaerbaek C, Dinesen B, Ørskov H. 1994 Free insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) in human serum. FEBS Lett. 348:185–191.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Juul A, Holm K, Kastrup KW, et al. 1997 Free insulin-like growth factor I serum levels in 1430 healthy children and adults, and its diagnostic value in patients suspected of growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:2497–2502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J BiochemHome page
S. H. Lee, M. Takahashi, K. Honke, E. Miyoshi, D. Osumi, H. Sakiyama, A. Ekuni, X. Wang, S. Inoue, J. Gu, et al.
Loss of core fucosylation of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 impairs its function, leading to the upregulation of serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 in fut8-/- mice.
J. Biochem., March 1, 2006; 139(3): 391 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. R. Clemmons, M. Sleevi, and W. H. Busby Jr.
Recombinant, Nonglycosylated Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 (IGFBP-3) Is Degraded Preferentially after Administration to Type II Diabetics, Resulting in Increased Endogenous Glycosylated IGFBP-3
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2005; 90(12): 6561 - 6568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Cianfarani, A. Liguori, S. Boemi, M. Maghnie, L. Iughetti, M. Wasniewska, M. E. Street, S. Zucchini, G. Aimaretti, and D. Germani
Inaccuracy of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein (IGFBP)-3 Assessment in the Diagnosis of Growth Hormone (GH) Deficiency from Childhood to Young Adulthood: Association to Low GH Dependency of IGF-II and Presence of Circulating IGFBP-3 18-Kilodalton Fragment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6028 - 6034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. J. E. Walenkamp, M. Karperien, A. M. Pereira, Y. Hilhorst-Hofstee, J. van Doorn, J. W. Chen, S. Mohan, A. Denley, B. Forbes, H. A. van Duyvenvoorde, et al.
Homozygous and Heterozygous Expression of a Novel Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Mutation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2005; 90(5): 2855 - 2864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Rinaldi, R. Kaaks, A. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A. A. Arslan, R. E. Shore, K. L. Koenig, L. Dossus, E. Riboli, P. Stattin, A. Lukanova, et al.
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I, IGF Binding Protein-3, and Breast Cancer in Young Women: A Comparison of Risk Estimates Using Different Peptide Assays
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 48 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. C. Baxter
What Is the Significance of IGF-Binding Protein-3 Proteolysis in the Circulation?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 5087 - 5088.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Binoux
Tools Now Exist to Measure Circulating IGF-Binding Protein-3 Proteolysis, to Study Its Regulation and Its Effects on IGF-I Bioavailability
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 5088 - 5089.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Lassarre, F. Duron, and M. Binoux
Use of the Ligand Immunofunctional Assay for Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein-3 (IGFBP-3) to Analyze IGFBP-3 Proteolysis and IGF-I Bioavailability in Healthy Adults, GH-Deficient and Acromegalic Patients, and Diabetics
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 1942 - 1952.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lassarre, C.
Right arrow Articles by Binoux, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lassarre, C.
Right arrow Articles by Binoux, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals