help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, A. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Drop, S. L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, A. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Drop, S. L. S.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 3 1240-1246
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Phenotypic Variation in a Family with Partial Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome Explained by Differences in 5{alpha} Dihydrotestosterone Availability

Annemie L. M. Boehmer, Albert O. Brinkmann, Rien M. Nijman, Marja C. T. Verleun-Mooijman, Petra de Ruiter, Martinus F. Niermeijer and Stenvert L. S. Drop

Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics (A.L.M.B., S.L.S.D.), and Department of Pediatric Urology (R.C.N.), Sophia Children’s Hospital; Department of Endocrinology and Reproduction (A.L.M.B., A.O.B., M.C.T.V.-M., P.d.R.), Erasmus University Rotterdam; and Department of Clinical Genetics (A.L.M.B., M.F.N.), University Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Annemie L. M. Boehmer, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Sophia Children’s Hospital, P.O. Box 2060, 3000 CB Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: a.Boehmer{at}JKZ-RKZ.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) gene result in a wide range of phenotypes of the androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS). Inter- and intrafamilial differences in the phenotypic expression of identical AR mutations are known, suggesting modifying factors in establishing the phenotype.

Two 46,XY siblings with partial AIS sharing the same AR gene mutation, R846H, but showing very different phenotypes are studied. Their parents are first cousins. One sibling with grade 5 AIS was raised as a girl; the other sibling with grade 3 AIS was raised as a boy. In both siblings serum levels of hormones were measured; a sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) suppression test was completed; and mutation analysis of the AR gene, Scatchard, and SDS-PAGE analysis of the AR protein was performed. Furthermore, 5{alpha}-reductase 2 expression and activity in genital skin fibroblasts were investigated, and the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene was sequenced.

The decrease in SHBG serum levels in a SHBG suppression test did not suggest differences in androgen sensitivity as the cause of the phenotypic variation. Also, androgen binding characteristics of the AR, AR expression levels, and the phosphorylation pattern of the AR on hormone binding were identical in both siblings. However, 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity was normal in genital skin fibroblasts from the phenotypic male patient but undetectable in genital skin fibroblasts from the phenotypic female patient. The lack of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity was due to absent or reduced expression of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 in genital skin fibroblasts from the phenotypic female patient. Exon and flanking intron sequences of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene showed no mutations in either sibling. Additional intragenic polymorphic marker analysis gave no evidence for different inherited alleles for the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene in the two siblings. Therefore, the absent or reduced expression of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 is likely to be additional to the AIS.

Distinct phenotypic variation in this family was caused by 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency, additional to AIS. This 5{alpha}-reductase deficiency is due to absence of expression of the 5{alpha}-reductase iso-enzyme 2 as shown by molecular studies. The distinct phenotypic variation in AIS here is explained by differences in the availability of 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone during embryonic sex differentiation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ANDROGEN INSENSITIVITY SYNDROME (AIS) is an X-linked disorder of male sexual differentiation, caused by a defective or absent androgen receptor (AR; reviewed in Ref. 1). Mutations in the AR gene result in a wide range of AIS phenotypes. The phenotypic spectrum in 46,XY individuals ranges from a complete female phenotype with testes [complete AIS (CAIS)], through female phenotypes with clitoromegaly or posterior fusion of the labia minora, to a male phenotype with hypospadias and/or micropenis and gynaecomastia, or even a normal male phenotype with infertility, all defined as partial AIS (PAIS) (1). The finding of more than 150 different AR gene mutations in over 250 AIS patients (2) illustrates the genetic heterogeneity in AIS.

The AR is a transcription factor that binds either testosterone (T) or 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone (DHT); however, DHT is bound with higher affinity and has a slower dissociation rate from the receptor than T (3, 4, 5). When androgen is bound to the AR, the complex dimerizes and migrates into the nucleus where it recruits transcription factors and binds to the promoter region of androgen-sensitive target genes (6).

With the advent of molecular analysis of the AR gene it was hoped that a correlation between a molecular defect and a particular phenotype could be established. Such a relationship would enable prediction of the response to androgen therapy in infants with PAIS, relevant for not only long-term psychosexual outcome but also for genetic counseling of parents and other identified female carrier relatives. Ten years after cloning of the AR gene (7, 8, 9, 10), it is obvious that there is no simple genotype-phenotype relationship in this phenotypically and genotypically heterogeneous syndrome. Identified mutations are associated with different phenotypes in the same kindred (11, 12, 13, 14) or rarely with CAIS in one kindred and with PAIS in another (2). Therefore, additional factors apparently may influence the effect of the mutant receptor on the development of the external genitalia.

Reduced 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity has been described in the 70s and 80s in AIS families and has been suggested to be the cause of the observed phenotypic variation (15, 16, 17). At that time, molecular evaluation of the AR and 5{alpha}-reductase 2 genes was not yet available.

Here, a family with distinct phenotypes in two siblings with the same AR gene mutation is reported. The identified mutation in the AR gene, R846H (amino acid numbering based on 20 glutamine residues and 16 glycine residues, thus a total of 910 amino acids) is a frequently identified mutation (2). Experimental evidence is provided for a different availability of DHT in these two siblings.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a nationwide study on the genotype/phenotype relationship in AIS, we studied a family with eight children, of whom two were affected with AIS (Fig. 1Go). The parents (subjects I-1 and I-2; Fig. 1Go) were of Moroccan descent and first cousins: their fathers were brothers. There was no family history of ambiguous genitalia.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Compacted pedigree of the family described. A square with the number 3 in the center means three males. A circle with number 2 in the middle means two females. The affected individuals are indicated with black circles or black squares according to their phenotypic appearance and not according to their genetic sex.

 
Subject II-5 was a 13-yr-old pubertal female patient, with not yet fully developed breasts, few pubic hairs, and no axillary hair (Tanner stage M3, P2, A0), a female habitus, and female voice. She was studied after her brother was diagnosed with AIS. The karyotype was 46,XY. External genitalia were a normally sized clitoris, normal labia majora, posterior fusion of the labia minora leading to an urogenital sinus (Fig. 2AGo), and a shallow (2.5 cm in length), blindly ending vagina that was connected with the urogenital sinus. Testes were localized bilaterally in the inguinal region. The following serum levels of hormones were determined: T, 13.5 nmol/L (range in normal males, 10–30 nmol/L); DHT, 1.55 nmol/L; T/DHT, 8.7 (normal males, <10); estradiol, 35 pmol/L (normal males, 50–200 pmol/L); and LH, 5.7 U/L (normal males, 1.5–8 U/L). In accordance with her personal wish, she was not gonadectomized until 2 yr later, at age 15.5 yr. Normally developed epididymides and vasa deferentia were found. Müllerian duct derivatives were absent. Serum hormone levels at that time were: T, 31.5 nmol/L; DHT, 2.42 nmol/L; T/DHT, 13; estradiol, 156 pmol/L; and LH, 8.4 U/L. Her voice had remained high-pitched, the clitoral size remained normal, pubic hair had remained Tanner stage P2, axillary hair was still absent, and her breasts had grown to M4. T and DHT, measured every 6 months from age 13.5 yr, showed T/DHT ratios between 8.6 and 13.0. From age 14, T had been above 30 nmol/L.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. External genitalia of subject II-5 at age 15.5 yr (A) and subject II-8 at 1 month of age (B).

 
Subject II-8 (Fig. 1Go), karyotype 46,XY, was born with perineoscrotal hypospadias, a micropenis with well developed corpora cavernosa, a bifid scrotum containing testes, and transposition of the scrotum (Fig. 2BGo). Müllerian duct remnants were absent, as was established by ultrasound. Bilaterally epididymides were palpable. Serum hormone levels measured at age 4 days: T, 0.64 nmol/L. Seventy-two hours after 1500 U human CG (hCG) im, T was 18 nmol/L. He was assigned the male sex. At 5 yr of age his basal serum levels were: LH, 0.1 U/L; T, 0.1 nmol/L; and DHT, <0.1 nmol/L. Seventy-two hours after 1500 U hCG im: T, 11.8 nmol/L; DHT, 2.1 nmol/L; T/DHT, 5.6. All values are within the normal range for this age.

I-1 and II-3 were normally virilized healthy adult males. II-6 was a normal healthy prepubertal boy with a normal penis length and a normal testis volume for his age. The mother, subject I-2, had a gonadal/somatic mosaïcism for the AR mutation as was shown by segregation analysis of the different AR alleles among affected and nonaffected family members and by allele-specific oligonucleotide analysis, respectively, as described previously (18).

The medical ethical committee of the University Hospital Rotterdam approved the protocol of this study.

SHBG suppression test

Androgen sensitivity in the liver can be measured in vivo with use of an SHBG suppression test. We have used the protocol described by Sinnecker et al. (19): Stanozolol (0.2 mg/kg/day, single evening dose) was administered orally at days 0, 1, and 2. Blood samples were taken before and at days 5, 6, 7, and 8 after the start of the test. The initial SHBG serum level was compared with the lowest level obtained after administration of Stanozolol (days 5, 6, 7, and 8) and expressed as a percentage of the initial value. In normal controls the SHBG serum level after Stanozolol declined to 35.6–62.1% (range) of the initial value. However, in patients with CAIS, the SHBG serum level remained unchanged, and in PAIS patients the SHBG level declined to 48.6–89.1% (range) of the initial value (19).

AR gene mutation detection

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes and from cultured genital skin fibroblasts, following standard procedures (20).

Exon and flanking intron sequences were screened for mutations in the AR gene with the use of PCR-single-strand conformational polymorphism (21). PCR fragments suspected to harbor mutations were analyzed by direct sequencing (22). Furthermore, in DNA isolated from genital skin fibroblasts, the entire AR gene of subject II-5 was sequenced.

AR gene CAGn(CAA)/GGN repeat length

CAGn(CAA) and GGN repeat lengths in exon 1 of the AR gene, encoding poly-glutamine and poly-glycine stretches, respectively, were determined as described previously (21, 22).

Cell culture

Skin biopsies were taken either during surgical correction of the external genitalia, or gonadectomy or circumcision. Genital skin fibroblasts were derived from biopsies of the fusion line of the labia minora of subject II-5 of control individuals, and from scrotal skin of subject II-8 and from preputium of a normal prepubertal boy obtained at circumcision. Furthermore, genital skin fibroblasts were analyzed from biopsies from preputium of a prepubertal 5{alpha}-reductase 2-deficient patient with clitoromegaly and posterior fusion of the labia minora. This patient had a T/DHT ratio after hCG of 16.5. All cell lines were cultured as described previously (22), with modifications as described with the experiments.

Androgen characteristics of the AR

Whole cell Scatchard analysis was performed on genital skin fibroblasts, as described previously (22). Genital skin fibroblast (GSF) 1 was used from subject II-5.

SDS-PAGE of the AR

Confluent cell layers in 150 cm2 culture flasks, were cultured in serum-free medium for 24 h, followed by 24 h in medium containing increasing concentrations (0, 5, 30, and 100 nM) of the synthetic, nonmetabolizable androgen methyltrienolone (R1881). GSF 1 was used from subject II-5. Whole cell lysates were prepared, immunoprecipitated, separated on a SDS-PAGE gel, and immunostained as described previously (22).

5{alpha}-Reductase 2 assay

5{alpha}-Reductase 2 activity can be influenced by either clonal origin of the cell line (23) or by the site of origin of the biopsies (24). Therefore, two different GSF cell lines from subject II-5 (GSF 1 and 2) derived from separate biopsies taken 1.5 yr apart were used for the studies.

GSF cell lines derived from biopsies from subject II-8, from a normal male, from a normal female, and from a 5{alpha}-reductase 2-deficient patient homozygous for a known pathogenic mutation in the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene (H231R) were used as controls.

Because 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity increases with serial subcultures (25, 26), all cell lines used were the seventh subculture.

To reduce possible bias by confluency rate, all cell lines were grown in 75-cm2 culture flasks with medium containing 10% FCS. They were harvested 7 days after subculture. At that time, the cell lines were confluent and the flasks contained ~1.2 x 106 cells.

Harvesting of cells. Cells were washed multiple times with PBS and with 20 mM Tris saline (pH 7.4), then scraped in Tris saline and pelleted at 800 x g. Pellets were washed twice in Tris saline. Cell-free extracts were prepared by four cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen and thawing.

Enzyme assay. Forty microliters of cell-free extracts were incubated with 10 µl of 30 mM NADPH and 50 µl reaction mixture [reaction mixture consisted of 500 µl of 10 mM Tris citrate (pH 5.5), 2.4 pmol 1,2,6,7 3H-testosterone (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK), and 7.6 pmol testosterone (Steraloids)] at 37 C for 1 h. The reaction was stopped on ice. Each incubation was done in duplicate. Assays were done in triplicate.

To all samples 10 µl of a steroid mixture containing androstanedione, androstenedione, DHT, testosterone, 3{alpha}-androstanediol, each 1 mg/mL ethanol, were added, before extraction of radioactivity with a total of 3 x 500 µL ethylacetate. Extracts were evaporated to dryness, and the residues were dissolved in 50 µl ethanol and chromatographed in dichloromethane:ethylacetate:methanol (85:15:3) on a 0.25-mm layer silica gel plate, 20 x 20 cm (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Steroids were visualized in a control lane by spraying with 20% H2SO4 in methanol and developing at 100 C for 15 min. Fractions were collected in separate vials, resuspended in 500 µl ethanol, and were counted in a liquid scintillator counter. 5{alpha}-Reductase activity was calculated from the sum of 3H-radioactivity in the androstanediol, DHT, and 3{alpha} androstanediol fractions divided through the sum of 3H radioactivity in the androstanediol, androstenediol, DHT, T, and 3{alpha} androstanediol fractions. The amount of protein in each cell-free extract was determined according to Bradford (27).

5{alpha}-Reductase activity was expressed as femtomoles of 5{alpha} reduced steroids formed per milligram of protein per hour.

Analysis of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene and polymorphic marker analysis

Exon and flanking intron sequences of the 5{alpha}-reductase type 2 gene (SRD5A2) from subject II-5 were analyzed with direct sequencing after amplification of fragments with primers described by Hiort et al. (27). As an intragenic polymorphic marker, codon 89 in exon 1 of the SRD5A2 gene was used. This codon is either CTA or GTA with unknown allele frequencies (29, 30). Genomic DNA isolated from GSF 1 (subject II-5) and GSF (subject II-8) was used.

RT-PCR of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 messenger RNA (mRNA)

Total RNA was extracted from GSF cell lines using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Breda, The Netherlands) and quantified by absorption at 260 nm. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 2.5 µg RNA with the use of an oligo dT primer (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Of each investigated cell line, cell pellets from different cell culture flasks were pooled and divided in equal aliquots. RNA was isolated from these aliquots in separate experiments. The various aliquots of RNA were subjected to several independent RT-PCR experiments.

As a control for cDNA synthesis, ß 10 actin was used. ß Actin was amplified with antisense primer GAGGTAGCAGGTGGCGTTTACGAAGAT and sense primer AAGGATTCCTATGTGGGCGACGAG. Primers used for amplification of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene were: antisense primer 5B, 5'-TGACAGTTTTCATCAGCATTG-3' specific for 3' untranslated sequences in exon 5; and sense primer 120A, 5'-CACTGGAAATGGAGTCCTTC-3', starting at codon 120 in exon 2. These primers were used in a PCR reaction as described below.

Three microliters of the obtained cDNA reaction product was used in a 50-µl PCR amplification reaction. The 50-µL PCR reaction mix contained 1.5 mM MgCl2. Conditions for the PCR reactions in a Biometra cycle sequencer were: hot start at 94 C for 5 min, then 35 cycles at 94 C for 1 min, at 55 C for 30 sec, at 72 C for 1 min, and final extension for 10 min at 72 C. The PCR product was visualized after electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel that contained ethidium bromide. Amplification of genomic DNA was prevented because intervening introns were in total ~ 7.3 kb in size, and the Amplitaq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk, CT) cannot amplify DNA of this size under the used conditions.

The resulting PCR product was subcloned into a plasmid using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and subjected to automated sequencing.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SHBG suppression test

An SHBG suppression test (19) showed a maximal decrease in SHBG of 73.5% on days 5, 6, 7, and 8 in the female patient, subject II-5 [normal males, <63.4%; PAIS, 63.4–93%; CAIS, >92% (31)], whereas a maximal decrease of 92% on day 7 was seen in subject II-8. It can be concluded that both siblings display a suppression in the PAIS range.

Mutation detection and identification in the AR gene

With PCR-single-strand conformational polymorphism, followed by direct sequencing of the AR gene, mutation R846H in the ligand-binding domain of the AR was identified in both individuals II-5 and II-8. No other mutations were identified on sequencing of the exon and flanking intron sequences of the AR gene of subject II-5.

Length of (CAG)nCAA and GGN repeats

In both siblings the (CAG)nCAA and GGN repeats in exon 1 of the AR gene mutant-allele carried 14 glutamine and 24 glycine residues (18), respectively.

AR binding characteristics

AR binding characteristics in GSF of subjects II-5 and II-8 (Table 1Go) show an increased equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) but a normal number of binding sites (Bmax). The difference in Bmax and Kd values between the two siblings should be interpreted as a variance of Scatchard analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Scratchard analysis of the AR in GSFs of both affected siblings

 
Hormone-dependent AR phosphorylation

AR protein isolated from wild-type cells cultured in the absence of androgens migrates as a doublet of 110 and 112 kDa during SDS-PAGE. These represent an unphosphorylated AR isotype and a phosphorylated AR isotype, respectively. On binding of androgens, the AR undergoes additional phosphorylation, resulting in a third isoform of 114 kDa. AR mutants that are either partially defective in ligand binding or in DNA binding or in transcription activation, migrate with a reduced amount of the 114 kDa isoform during SDS-PAGE (Ref. 31 ; Fig. 3Go). At a relatively low androgen concentration of 5 nM R1881, GSFs of II-5 and II-8 express equally reduced amounts of the third isoform of 114 kDa compared with the wild type. Increased androgen levels did not induce the 114-kDa band as in the wild-type cells (Fig. 3Go). Moreover, both siblings have an equally deficient hormone induced upshift of the 114 kDa AR isoform. A deficient hormone induced upshift is in agreement with the increased dissociation of the AR hormone complex in GSF of both patients.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Hormone-dependent AR phosphorylation in GSFs. GSFs of both siblings (II-5 and II-8) and a normal prepubertal boy (WT) were cultured in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations (0–100 nM) of the nonmetabolizable androgen R1881. The molecular sizes of the AR isoforms are indicated at the left (110, 112, and 114 kDa). AR protein isolated from wild-type cells cultured in the absence of androgens migrates as a doublet of 110 and 112 kDa, representing an unphosphorylated 110 kDa AR isotype and a phosphorylated 112 kDa AR isotype, respectively. On binding of androgens, the AR undergoes additional phosphorylation, resulting in a third isoform of 114 kDa. At a relative low androgen concentration of 5 nM R1881, GSFs of siblings II-5 and II-8 have equally reduced amounts of the third isoform of 114 kDa compared with the wild type. Increased androgen levels did not induce the 114-kDa band as in the wild-type cells, and both siblings have an equally deficient hormone-induced upshift of the 114-kDa AR isoform.

 
5{alpha}-Reductase 2 activity

Of subject II-5, two different GSF cell lines were deficient in 5{alpha}-reductase 2, similar as in a 5{alpha}-reductase 2-deficient patient homozygous for SRD5A2 mutation H231R. However, sibling II-8 had normal 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity in GSF (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. 5{alpha}-Reductase 2 activities in GSFs from control persons and 46,XY patients with AIS or 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency

 
Analysis of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene and polymorphic marker analysis

No mutations were found in the 5{alpha}-reductase type 2 gene of subjects II-5 and II-8 on sequencing exon and flanking intron sequences.

Both siblings were heterozygous for a known polymorphism in exon 1 of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene, CTA/GTA, codon 89 (data not shown). A homozygous defect in the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene, inherited from the consanguineous parents and present in other parts of the gene than the sequenced parts such as introns or in a gene promoter, is, therefore, very unlikely.

5{alpha}-Reductase 2 mRNA expression

After RT-PCR of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 mRNA using a primer combination, as outlined in Subjects and Methods, a 460-bp fragment can be expected. No 5{alpha}-reductase 2 cDNA was detectable after RT-PCR of total RNA preparations from GSFs 1 and 2 of subject II-5, whereas in total RNA preparations from the GSF of subject II-8 a band of 460-bp was detected (Fig. 4Go). This band was subcloned and sequenced and exhibited the wild-type 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene sequence. Therefore, the absence of 5{alpha}-reductase type 2 activity in GSFs of subject II-5 is most likely due to lack of or reduced expression of 5{alpha}-reductase type 2.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. RT-PCR of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 mRNA. RNA extracted from GSFs 1 and 2 of subject II-5 and RNA from the GSF of subject II-8 was used. ß Actin expression was used as a control for cDNA synthesis. The amplified 5{alpha}-reductase 2 cDNA fragment, 460 bp in size, is indicated with an arrow.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this family, a very different phenotypic expression of AIS is observed in siblings carrying the same mutation in the AR gene. Additional mutations in the AR gene or differences in the length of the polyglutamine or polyglycine repeats were not found. AR gene promoter mutations are very unlikely because AR protein expression is similar and normal in both siblings. Furthermore, phosphorylation of the AR on hormone binding, was equally reduced in genital skin fibroblasts of both siblings, irrespective whether low or high concentrations of the nonmetabolizable androgen R1881 were used. Phosphorylation of the AR occurs during DNA binding of the ligand-AR complex on hormone-responsive elements and during or following transcription of androgen-regulated genes (31). The equally reduced phosphorylation of ARs and comparable clinical androgen responsiveness in both siblings, as determined by SHBG suppression tests, provide evidence that the AR itself is not responsible for the distinct variation in phenotype and suggest an important role for factors other than the AR in determining the phenotype.

5{alpha}-Reductase activity was found to be totally absent in genital skin fibroblasts of subject II-5 (Table 2Go). DHT, formed in the embryonal urogenital tissues by 5{alpha}-reductase 2, causes elongation and enlargement of the urogenital tubercle and fusion of the urogenital swellings and folds during the development of the embryo (32, 33). We hypothezised that the phenotypic differences between the siblings might be due to the difference in availability of DHT, especially because both siblings carry a particular mutant AR (R846H). When this R846H mutant AR is stimulated with DHT instead of testosterone, the transcriptional deficit becomes less (34, 35) and the functional defect can even be partially corrected by the repeated addition of DHT (34). Therefore, a difference in availability of DHT between the two siblings could have been of particular influence on the phenotype.

Although, serum dihydrotestosterone levels at puberty in subject II-5 are low but detectable and once fell within the low normal range, similar DHT serum levels are found in pubertal/adult 5{alpha}-reductase 2-deficient patients with deficient 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity as established in GSFs (16, 36). When 5{alpha}-reductase 2-deficient patients enter puberty they start to synthesize some DHT. The source of this DHT may be either peripheral conversion by 5{alpha}-reductase type 1 in the liver and skin or, in some cases, residual activity of the mutant enzyme.

A 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency secondary to the primary defect AIS has been reported to cause phenotypic differences in other families with AIS and was established by 5{alpha}-reductase 2 assays in GSFs and by hormonal analysis in serum (15, 16, 17). It has been suggested that in AIS patients 5{alpha}-reductase 2 enzyme activity is preserved in the liver but deficient in the periphery, in contrast to the autosomal recessive inherited syndrome of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency wherein a generalized severe defect of both hepatic and peripheral 5{alpha}-reductase is found (16, 37). These observations were made before cloning of the AR and 5{alpha}-reductase 2 genes (7, 10, 29, 38). The nature of the decreased 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity remained unidentified. The repeated observation of this 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency secondary to AIS and the identification of a mutant AR, which is especially dependent on DHT for residual androgen action, provides a basis for further studies on secondary 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency.

RT-PCR experiments in this family show that the 5{alpha} 10 reductase 2 deficiency in GSFs of subject II-5 is due to reduced expression of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene (SRD5A2). A homozygous defect in the SRD5A2 gene inherited from the consanguineous parents was excluded as no mutations in the SRD5A2 gene were found in both siblings. The presence of mutations in the remaining intronic sequences or the promoter region of the SRD5A2 gene is very unlikely because both siblings are heterozygotes for the CTA/GTA polymorphism in exon 1.

With molecular means we show that the additional 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency in the presented subject II-5 with AIS is due to absent or reduced expression of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 enzyme.

The etiology of this additional 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency is not clear. One possible explanation is disruption of a feed forward control mechanism: formation of trace amounts of DHT that are bound to the AR induces 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity thereby increasing DHT synthesis and triggering a positive developmental cascade. Such a positive feedback mechanism exists in the rat embryonic urogenital tract where 5{alpha}-reductase type 2 expression is increased by either T or DHT (39). A positive feedback mechanism is also present in adult rat prostate but is absent in embryonic rat prostate (39, 40). In humans, the presence of such a positive regulation by androgens is suggested by the presence of reduced 5{alpha}-reductase 2 expression in urogenital swellings and tubercles in female fetuses. The expression of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 in female fetuses is one third of the expression of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 found in males, who have higher levels of androgens (36). Arguments against positive regulation of 5{alpha}-reductase 2 enzyme activity in humans are the observations that in many CAIS patients 5{alpha}-reductase 2 activity is normal and during in vitro culture of GSFs no increase of 5{alpha}-reductase activity is observed after stimulation with androgen (24, 41, 42). In GSFs, 5{alpha}-reductase 2 is the predominantly expressed and active iso-enzyme (43).

Others have suggested a unbalance between estrogen and androgen action as the cause for secondary 5{alpha}-reductase deficiency (16, 24).

An interesting possibility is an additional autosomal recessively inherited defect in a factor regulating 5{alpha}-reductase 2 expression, inherited from the consanguineous parents by subject II-5. Because 5{alpha}-reductase 2 expression appears in fetal rats before testicular androgen synthesis starts, it was suggested that the early regulation and most likely the initial induction events are androgen independent in rat (38). Which factors control the temporal and cell type-specific pattern of 5{alpha}-reductase enzymes in the rat or in man is presently unknown.

These observations support the hypothesis that differences in the availability of DHT in different target tissues could lead to phenotypic variation between AIS patients who carry the same AR gene mutation. This study shows that distinct intrafamilial phenotypic variation can be associated with additional 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency, information to be implemented in genetic counseling of families with androgen insensitivity.

Additional 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency was shown to be associated with undetectable 5{alpha}-reductase 2 mRNA levels in GSFs. The total lack of enzyme activity is unlikely to be due to mutations in the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene itself. Possible causes for this additional 5{alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency are a defective autocatalyic regulation or an autosomal recessively inherited defect in a regulatory protein that controls the cell type-specific and temporal expression pattern of the 5{alpha}-reductase 2 gene.

Received December 2, 1999.

Revised July 31, 2000.

Revised November 2, 2000.

Accepted November 5, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Quigley CA, De Bellis A, Marschke KB, el-Awady MK, Wilson EM, French FS. 1995 Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical, and molecular perspectives. Endocr Rev. 16:271–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Gottlieb B, Beitel LK, Lumbroso R, Pinsky L, Trifiro M. 1999 Update of the Androgen Receptor Gene Mutations Database. Hum Mutat. 14:103–114.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Zhou ZX, Lane MV, Kemppainen JA, French FS, Wilson EM. 1995 Specificity of ligand-dependent androgen receptor stabilization: receptor domain interactions influence ligand dissociation and receptor stability. Mol Endocrinol. 9:208–218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Grino PB, Griffin JE, Wilson JD. 1990 Testosterone at high concentrations interacts with the human androgen receptor similarly to dihydrotestosterone. Endocrinology. 126:1165–1172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Maes M, Sultan C, Zerhouni N, Rothwell SW, Migeon CJ. 1979 Role of testosterone binding to the androgen receptor in male sexual differentiation of patients with 5 {alpha}-reductase deficiency. J Steroid Biochem. 11:1385–1392.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Jenster G, van der Korput HA, van Vroonhoven C, van der Kwast TH, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. 1991 Domains of the human androgen receptor involved in steroid binding, transcriptional activation, and subcellular localization. Mol Endocrinol. 5:1396–1404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Trapman J, Klaassen P, Kuiper GG, et al. 1988 Cloning, structure and expression of a cDNA encoding the human androgen receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 153:241–248.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Lubahn DB, Joseph DR, Sullivan PM, Willard HF, French FS, Wilson EM. 1988 Cloning of human androgen receptor complementary DNA and localization to the X chromosome. Science. 240:327–330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tilley WD, Marcelli M, Wilson JD, McPhaul MJ. 1989 Characterization and expression of a cDNA encoding the human androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 86:327–331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chang C, Kokontis J, Liao S. 1988 Molecular cloning of human and rat complementary DNA encoding androgen receptors. Science. 240:324–326.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Batch JA, Davies HR, Evans BA, Hughes IA, Patterson MN. 1993 Phenotypic variation and detection of carrier status in the partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 68:453–457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Imasaki K, Hasegawa T, Okabe T, et al. 1994 Single amino acid substitution (840Arg->His) in the hormone-binding domain of the androgen receptor leads to incomplete androgen insensitivity syndrome associated with a thermolabile androgen receptor. Eur J Endocrinol. 130:569–574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rodien P, Mebarki F, Mowszowicz I, et al. 1996 Different phenotypes in a family with androgen insensitivity caused by the same M780I point mutation in the androgen receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2994–2998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Evans BA, Hughes IA, Bevan CL, Patterson MN, Gregory JW. 1997 Phenotypic diversity in siblings with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 76:529–531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kuttenn F, Mowszowicz I, Wright F, et al. 1979 Male pseudohermaphroditism: a comparative study of one patient with 5 {alpha}-reductase deficiency and three patients with the complete form of testicular feminization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 49:861–865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Imperato-McGinley J, Peterson RE, Gautier T, et al. 1982 Hormonal evaluation of a large kindred with complete androgen insensitivity: evidence for secondary 5 {alpha}-reductase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 54:931–941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Jukier L, Kaufman M, Pinsky L, Peterson RE. 1984 Partial androgen resistance associated with secondary 5 {alpha}-reductase deficiency: identification of a novel qualitative androgen receptor defect and clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 59:679–688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Boehmer AL, Brinkmann AO, Niermeijer MF, Bakker L, Halley DJ, Drop SL. 1997 Germ-line and somatic mosaicism in the androgen insensitivity syndrome: implications for genetic counseling (Letter). Am J Hum Genet. 60:1003–1006.[Medline]
  19. Sinnecker GH, Hiort O, Nitsche EM, Holterhus PM, Kruse K. 1997 Functional assessment and clinical classification of androgen sensitivity in patients with mutations of the androgen receptor gene. German Collaborative Intersex Study Group. Eur J Pediatr. 156:7–14.[Medline]
  20. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. 1988 A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:1215.[Free Full Text]
  21. Ris-Stalpers C, Hoogenboezem T, Sleddens HF, et al. 1994 A practical approach to the detection of androgen receptor gene mutations and pedigree analysis in families with x-linked androgen insensitivity. Pediatr Res. 36:227–234.[Medline]
  22. Bruggenwirth HT, Boehmer AL, Verleun-Mooijman MC, et al. 1996 Molecular basis of androgen insensitivity. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 58:569–575.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Griffin JE, Allman DR, Durrant JL, Wilson JD. 1981 Variation in steroid 5 {alpha}-reductase activity in cloned human skin fibroblasts. Shift in phenotypic expression from high to low activity upon subcloning. J Biol Chem. 256:3662–3666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Pinsky L, Kaufman M, Straisfeld C, Zilahi B, Hall CS. 1978 5{alpha}-reductase activity of genital and nongenital skin fibroblasts from patients with 5{alpha}-reductase deficiency, androgen insensitivity, or unknown forms of male pseudohermaphroditism. Am J Med Genet. 1:407–416.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Lamberigts G, Dierickx P, De Moor P, Verhoeven G. 1979 Comparison of the metabolism and receptor binding of testosterone and 17 ß-hydroxy-5 {alpha}- androstan-3-one in normal skin fibroblast cultures: influence of origin and passage number. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 48:924–930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Mowszowicz I, Kirchhoffer MO, Kuttenn F, Mauvais-Jarvis P. 1980 Testosterone 5 {alpha} reductase activity of skin fibroblasts. Increase with serial subcultures. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 17:41–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Bradford MM. 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 72:248–254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Hiort O, Sinnecker GH, Willenbring H, Lehners A, Zollner A, Struve D. 1996 Nonisotopic single-strand conformation analysis of the 5 {alpha}-reductase type 2 gene for the diagnosis of 5 {alpha}-reductase deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3415–3418.[Abstract]
  29. Andersson S, Berman DM, Jenkins EP, Russell DW. 1991 Deletion of steroid 5 {alpha}-reductase 2 gene in male pseudohermaphroditism. Nature. 354:159–161.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Labrie F, Sugimoto Y, Luu-The V, et al. 1992 Structure of human type II 5 {alpha}-reductase gene. Endocrinology. 131:1571–1573.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Jenster G, de Ruiter PE, van der Korput HA, Kuiper GG, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. 1994 Changes in the abundance of androgen receptor isotypes: effects of ligand treatment, glutamine-stretch variation, and mutation of putative phosphorylation sites. Biochemistry. 33:14064–14072.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Grumbach MM, Conte FA. 1998 Disorders of sexual differentiation. In: Wilson JD, Foster DW, Kronenberg HM, Larsen PR, eds. Williams’ textbook of endocrinology, ed 9. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1303–1425.
  33. Thigpen AE, Silver RI, Guileyardo JM, Casey ML, McConnell JD, Russell DW. 1993 Tissue distribution and ontogeny of steroid 5 {alpha}-reductase isozyme expression. J Clin Invest. 92:903–910.
  34. Marcelli M, Zoppi S, Wilson CM, Griffin JE, McPhaul MJ. 1994 Amino acid substitutions in the hormone-binding domain of the human androgen receptor alter the stability of the hormone receptor complex. J Clin Invest. 94:1642–1650.
  35. Bevan CL, Brown BB, Davies HR, Evans BA, Hughes IA, Patterson MN. 1996 Functional analysis of six androgen receptor mutations identified in patients with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 5:265–273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Wilson JD, Griffin JE, Russell DW. 1993 Steroid 5 {alpha}-reductase 2 deficiency. Endocr Rev. 14:577–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Zhu Y-S, Katz MD, Imperato-McGinley J. 1998 Natural potent androgens: lessons from human genetic models. In: Hughes IA, ed. Bailliere’s clinical endocrinology and metabolism. Sexual differentiation. London: Bailliere Tindal; 83–114.
  38. Lubahn DB, Joseph DR, Sar M, et al. 1988 The human androgen receptor: complementary deoxyribonucleic acid cloning, sequence analysis and gene expression in prostate. Mol Endocrinol. 2:1265–1275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. George FW, Russell DW, Wilson JD. 1991 Feed-forward control of prostate growth: dihydrotestosterone induces expression of its own biosynthetic enzyme, steroid 5 {alpha}-reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88:8044–8047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Berman DM, Tian H, Russell DW. 1995 Expression and regulation of steroid 5 {alpha}-reductase in the urogenital tract of the fetal rat. Mol Endocrinol. 9:1561–1570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Jenkins JS, Ash S. 1971 The metabolism of testosterone by skin in normal subjects and in testicular feminization. J Endocrinol. 49:515–520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Mowszowicz I, Melanitou E, Kirchhoffer MO, Mauvais-Jarvis P. 1983 Dihydrotestosterone stimulates 5 {alpha}-reductase activity in pubic skin fibroblasts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 56:320–325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Mestayer C, Berthaut I, Portois MC, et al. 1996 Predominant expression of 5 {alpha}-reductase type 1 in pubic skin from normal subjects and hirsute patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1989–1993.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Kohler, S. Lumbroso, J. Leger, F. Audran, E. S. Grau, F. Kurtz, G. Pinto, M. Salerno, T. Semitcheva, P. Czernichow, et al.
Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Somatic Mosaicism of the Androgen Receptor in Seven Families and Consequences for Sex Assignment and Genetic Counseling
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 106 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, A. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Drop, S. L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boehmer, A. L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Drop, S. L. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals