help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kruijver, F. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swaab, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kruijver, F. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swaab, D. F.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 86, No. 2 818-827
Copyright © 2001 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Sex Differences in Androgen Receptors of the Human Mamillary Bodies Are Related to Endocrine Status Rather Than to Sexual Orientation or Transsexuality

Frank P. M. Kruijver, Alonso Fernández-Guasti1, Mariann Fodor2, Elise M. Kraan and Dick F. Swaab

Graduate School of Neurosciences, Netherlands Institute for Brain Research (F.P.M.K., A.F.-G., M.F., E.M.K., D.F.S.), 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacobiology, CINVESTAV (A.F.-G.), and División de Investigaciones en Neurociencias, IMP (A.F.-G.), México City, México; and Research Institute for Endocrinology, Reproduction, and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Free University Amsterdam (M.F.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: F. P. M. Kruijver, M.D., or D. F. Swaab, M.D., Ph.D., Netherlands Institute for Brain Research, Meibergdreef 33, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: f.kruijver{at}nih.knaw.nl


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In a previous study we found androgen receptor (AR) sex differences in several regions throughout the human hypothalamus. Generally, men had stronger nuclear AR immunoreactivity (AR-ir) than women. The strongest nuclear labeling was found in the caudal hypothalamus in the mamillary body complex (MBC), which is known to be involved in aspects of cognition and sexual behavior. The present study was carried out to investigate whether the sex difference in AR-ir of the MBC is related to sexual orientation or gender identity (i.e. the feeling of being male or female) or to circulating levels of androgens, as nuclear AR-ir is known to be up-regulated by androgens. Therefore, we studied the MBC in postmortem brain material from the following groups: young heterosexual men, young homosexual men, aged heterosexual castrated and noncastrated men, castrated and noncastrated transsexuals, young heterosexual women, and a young virilized woman. Nuclear AR-ir did not differ significantly between heterosexual and homosexual men, but was significantly stronger than that in women. A female-like pattern of AR-ir (i.e. no to weak nuclear staining) was observed in 26- to 53-yr-old castrated male-to-female transsexuals and in old castrated and noncastrated men, 67–87 yr of age. In analogy with animal studies showing strong activational effects of androgens on nuclear AR-ir, the present data suggest that nuclear AR-ir in the human MBC is dependent on the presence or absence of circulating levels of androgen. The group data were, moreover, supported by the fact that a male-like AR-ir (i.e. intense nuclear AR-ir) was found in a 36-yr-old bisexual noncastrated male-to-female transsexual and in a heterosexual virilized woman, 46 yr of age, with high levels of circulating testosterone. In conclusion, the sexually dimorphic AR-ir in the MBC seemed to be clearly related to circulating levels of androgens and not to sexual orientation or gender identity. The functional implications of these alterations are discussed in relation to reproduction, cognition, and neuroprotection.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IN ANALOGY WITH the nonhuman vertebrate brain (1, 2), it is thought that in the human also the interaction between sex hormones and their receptors may play an important role in brain development (organizing effects) and may in adulthood alter brain function (activating effects), and that these two mechanisms lead to sex differences in behavior in adult life. Structural and functional sex differences in the brain may be related to reproduction, sexual orientation, gender identity (i.e. the feeling of being male or female), cognition, and disease (3, 4). In a number of areas of the human hypothalamus, structural and functional differences between the sexes and between homosexual and heterosexual men have been described (5, 6, 7). In addition, our group has found that the central part of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BSTc) is sexually dimorphic, i.e. smaller in women, with a female volume and neuron number in male-to-female transsexuals (4, 8).

It has been shown that various areas of the preoptic area (POA) (9, 10), BST (11) and suprachiasmatic nucleus (12, 13) are larger in men than in women, whereas the opposite was found for the anterior commissure (14). Moreover, hypothalamic differences in relation to sexual orientation have been observed. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (15) and the anterior commissure (16) are larger in homosexual than in heterosexual men, whereas the interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus-3 is smaller in homosexual than in heterosexual subjects (17). These data together with the abundant information showing that sexual orientation and gender identity do not vary with adult endocrine changes (18, 19) suggest that any possible clue to understanding the biological basis of sex differences, sexual orientation, or gender identity will require careful analysis of a large number of brain areas.

Recently we found that in a number of hypothalamic areas men showed stronger androgen receptor (AR) immunoreactivity (AR-ir) than women. Interestingly, in the anterior hypothalamus only moderate sex differences were found, whereas a conspicuous sex difference occurred in the posterior hypothalamus, i.e. the medial mamillary nucleus (MMN) and lateromamillary nucleus (LMN) of the mamillary body (MB) complex (MBC) (20). Such sexual dimorphisms may be related to gender differences in certain aspects of reproduction or sexual behavior, as various studies showed that lesions in the rat MB produced a complete loss of sexual activity (21). Moreover, electrical stimulation of this area in squirrel monkeys induces penile erection (22, 23). In addition, Lisk (24) reported in 1967 that implanting testosterone into the MBC of male castrated rats restored sexual excitability in the presence of receptive females (see also Refs. 25 and 26). These data suggest that this area participates in the control of male sexual motivation. In contrast, in the female rat, Galindo-Estaun (27) showed that lesioning the MB did not alter the estrous cycle or alter sexual or maternal behavior.

The present study was carried out to investigate whether the sex difference in nuclear AR-ir of the human MBC is related to sexual orientation, gender identity, or endocrine status. In many species, castration strongly reduces or even eliminates nuclear AR-ir, whereas testosterone, but not estrogen, injection restores such strong nuclear AR-ir (28, 29, 30). As nuclear AR-ir is up-regulated by androgens (28, 31, 32), we would expect decreased AR-ir in castrated/aged men. Therefore, we studied AR-ir in the MBC in groups of subjects with different testosterone levels (33, 34), i.e. young heterosexual men/young homosexual men, young heterosexual women, aged heterosexual castrated and noncastrated men, and castrated and noncastrated transsexuals.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects

In the present study we included the area of the MBC from the posterior hypothalamus of the following 47 patients: 1) young heterosexual men (n = 9), 2) young homosexual men (n = 10), 3) old heterosexual castrated men (n = 5), 4) castrated male-to-female transsexuals (n = 6), 5) old heterosexual intact men (n = 5), 6) young heterosexual women (n = 8), 7) a 36-yr-old noncastrated male-to-female transsexual, 8) a nontreated 84-yr-old male subject with strong cross-gender identity feelings, 9) a 51-yr-old female-to-male transsexual, and 10) a 46-yr-old woman with high levels of androgens.

Brains were obtained by autopsy (for clinicopathological information and ages, see Table 3Go). Unless stated otherwise, patients had no primary neurological or psychiatric diseases. The sexual orientation of the subjects was presumed to be heterosexual (15) unless stated otherwise, whereas the sexual orientation of the homosexual group was documented in the clinical records (15). All homosexual patients died of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or related diseases. The patient data have previously been reported (15). General pathology and neuropathology were performed either at the Free University of Amsterdam (Dr. W. Kamphorst, Prof. F. C. Stam or Prof. P. van der Valk) or at the Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam (Dr. D. Troost). The subjects had no primary endocrine illnesses, except for those who had undergone orchidectomy, had been given hormonal treatment, or had had abnormal hormone fluctuations that are mentioned in Table 2GoGo. The pathologically high levels of androgens in a 46-yr-old woman, [androstenedione, 48.0 ng/mL (normal values for women, 0.4–3.5 ng/mL); testosterone, 26.82 nmol/L (normal values for women, 1.04–3.30 nmol/L)] were due to an adrenal cortex carcinoma.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Brain material showing nuclear and cytoplasmic androgen receptor labeling (AR-ir) in the MBC

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Patient data

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2A. Patient data

 
Histology and immunohistochemistry

After autopsy, the hypothalamus was fixed for about 1 month in 4% formaldehyde at room temperature, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Serial 6-µm frontal sections were cut on a Leitz microtome (Rockleigh, NJ).

The immunohistochemical protocol followed for the AR staining has been previously described in detail (20). Briefly, this protocol consisted of mounting paraffin-embedded sections of the posterior hypothalamus onto SuperFrost Plus (Menzel, Darmstadt, Germany) slides. The sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated in a series of ethanol concentrations. To retrieve antigenicity, sections were microwaved (10 min at 700 watts) in 0.1 mol/L citric acid monohydrate buffer (pH 6.0) (35, 36), after which they were rinsed with TBS buffer (0.05 mol/L Tris-0.9% NaCl, pH 7.6). To decrease background, the slides were preincubated for 1 h with TBS-milk [5% milk-TBS solution with commercially available powdered milk (ELK, Campina Melkunie, Eindhoven, The Netherlands)] before incubation with the primary antibody PG21 (donated by Drs. Gail Prins and Geoffrey Greene; 1:1000) for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently kept overnight at 4 C. After rinsing in TBS-milk buffer, sections were incubated for 1 h with a goat antirabbit biotinylated second antibody (1:200), followed by another hour of incubation in the avidin-biotin complex (1:800). The subsequent signal amplification method consisted of an incubation in biotinylated tyramine (1:1000) and 0.01% peroxide (Merck & Co., Darmstadt, Germany) for 20 min (37). Thereafter, sections were rinsed with TBS, and the avidin-biotin complex procedure was repeated. After rinsing in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), slides were developed by incubation for 10 min in 0.05 mol/L Tris-HCl containing 0.05% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 0.01% hydrogen peroxide, and 0.3% nickel ammonium sulfate. Developed sections were dehydrated in alcohol, cleared with xylene, and coverslipped with Entallan (Merck & Co.).

Analysis of AR staining intensity

The sections were rated for staining intensity by three independent investigators blind to the details of the patients. The few differences in rating were concurred by settlement (20). The category assigned to the MMN and LMN corresponded to the predominant cell type within that area according to the following scale: 0 = no staining, 1 = staining diffuse and transparent, and 2 = intense staining with individual granules of the reaction product distinguishable. The staining range was established for both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. The estimates were made at three different microscopic magnifications: x2.5, x10, and x40 objectives (20). The identification of MMN and LMN was made with the aid of maps of coronal sections of the human brain published by Mai et al. (38) and using alternating thionine-stained sections for orientation.

Statistics

The assigned categories of AR-ir in the MMN and LMN were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test. The fixation time and postmortem delay were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (two-tailed).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Staining specificity

Negative controls, i.e. without the first antibody, and positive control sections, i.e. tissue of mouse testes and human anterior pituitary, were run parallel with the hypothalamic sections. Literature data have shown the specificity of the anti-AR antibody for brain immunohistochemical studies (29, 30, 31, 39, 40). The specificity data we have added (20) are briefly described below (data not shown). Omitting the AR antibody PG21 totally prevented staining. Paraffin-embedded sections of formalin-fixed mouse and human testes showed clear AR staining in the peritubular cells as previously reported (41, 42). In the human anterior pituitary isolated groups of cells with moderate to strong AR-ir were observed, as has also been reported in the Brazilian opossum (43) and rat (42). An adsorption test, including an immunoblotting analysis for PG21 with a peptide that consisted of the first 20 amino acids of the peptide that is recognized by PG21, showed the expected concentration gradient on nitrocellulose paper [the technique has been described by Van der Sluis et al. (44)]. After adsorption of the PG21 antibody with its corresponding peptide, nuclear and cytoplasmic stainings were completely eliminated (20).

Staining pattern

ANOVAs for fixation time and postmortem delay among the heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and castrated transsexual men did not exhibit statistically significant differences (P > 0.1 and P > 0.9, respectively).

The immunohistochemical staining for AR in the MMN and LMN revealed cells with nuclear or cytoplasmic labeling or with both types of staining (Tables 1Go and 3Go and Figs. 1Go-3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Androgen receptor intensity staining in the medial mamillary nucleus (MMN) and the lateromamillary nucleus (LMN) of the mamillary body of heterosexual young men, heterosexual young women, homosexual young men, and castrated transsexual men

 


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Photomicrographs showing AR-ir in neurons of the MMN of the mamillary body of a heterosexual man (A), a heterosexual woman (B), a homosexual man (C), and a woman with high levels of androgens (D). Note that in the mamillary body there is a clear sex difference in AR-ir (see A and B), whereas there is no difference in the intensity of AR staining between the representative heterosexual man (A), the homosexual man (C), and the virilized (androgenized) woman (D). Scale bar, 150 µm.

 
The heterosexual men showed strong nuclear AR-ir in both brain regions (Tables 1Go and 3Go and Fig. 1AGo). In contrast, the women revealed much less intense labeling in the nucleus of neurons of the LMN and MMN (Tables 1Go and 3Go and Fig. 2BGo). This sex difference was statistically significant for nuclear staining in both areas (P < 0.05). The homosexual men showed a similar staining to that of the heterosexual men for both areas (P > 0.2) with a more moderate staining in the MMN (Tables 1Go and 3Go and Fig. 1CGo). Women differed significantly from homosexual men in nuclear AR-ir in both the MMN and LMN (P < 0.05). The castrated male-to-female transsexual group had a lack of nuclear staining in both brain areas, but had cytoplasmic labeling in the LMN and MNN (Tables 1Go and 3Go and Fig. 2BGo). This group was statistically different in the LMN from the heterosexual and homosexual men group (P < 0.05) and similar to that in women (P > 0.5). The castrated male-to-female transsexual group had significantly less nuclear AR-ir in the MMN than the heterosexual male group (P < 0.05). This difference showed only a trend when compared with homosexual men (P = 0.10). When compared with women, the castrated male-to-female transsexual group did clearly not differ from women in the MMN (P > 0.7).



View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Illustration of the staining intensity of nuclear AR-ir in neurons of a noncastrated 36-yr-old male-to-female transsexual (A) compared with the lack of such staining in a 26-yr-old castrated male-to-female transsexual. Scale bar, 150 µm.

 
In the 36-yr-old noncastrated male-to-female transsexual, strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was observed in both areas (Fig. 2AGo). Similarly, the 46-yr-old woman with high levels of androgens revealed strong nuclear labeling and weak to intermediate cytoplasmic labeling in the LMN and MMN (Fig. 1DGo). The female-to-male transsexual who did not receive androgen replacement therapy during the last 3 yr before death (Table 2Go) showed less intense nuclear and weak to intermediate cytoplasmic staining in both the LMN and MMN.

The results of staining in the posterior hypothalamus of old patients are illustrated in Fig. 3Go (A and B). In old castrated heterosexual men almost no nuclear and weak cytoplasmic AR-ir were found (Table 3Go and Fig. 3BGo). Thus, in this group of five, two subjects had very weak nuclear and cytoplasmic AR-ir in both areas, whereas three of five had no nuclear but weak cytoplasmic AR-ir (Table 3Go and Fig. 3BGo). A similar trend of weak AR staining with more, but less intense, nuclear AR-ir was observed in five old intact men (Table 3Go and Fig. 3AGo). In this group four of five of the individuals had very weak nuclear as well as cytoplasmic AR-ir (Table 3Go). Between the castrated old men and the intact old men no statistical significant differences were found.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Illustration of the almost complete lack of nuclear AR-ir in a noncastrated old man (A) and in a castrated old man (B). Scale bar, 50 µm.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present study confirms the clear sex differences in nuclear AR-ir expression in neurons of the MBC (20) and shows, for the first time, that this sex difference is related to circulating levels of testosterone rather than to sexual orientation or gender identity.

Heterosexual and homosexual men had the most intense nuclear AR-ir in the LMN and MMN which were statistically not different from each other but showed significantly more AR-ir than women. A similar male-like staining intensity was also found in a 36-yr-old bisexual noncastrated male-to-female transsexual and in a 46-yr-old heterosexual virilized woman with high circulating levels of testosterone. In all cases studied, a close relationship was found between the endocrine status and the intensity of AR staining. High levels of testosterone went together with high nuclear AR-ir and low levels of testosterone with weak or no nuclear AR-ir. The fact that homosexual men showed more variability in their nuclear AR-ir profiles compared with heterosexual men, whereas in the MMN the AR-ir did not differ statistically from the transsexual group might be due to their acquired immunodeficiency syndrome status, as some of these patients have subnormal testosterone levels (45, 46, 47). The strong decrease in nuclear MBC AR-ir in five old male heterosexual intact subjects also fit the idea of an androgen-dependent nuclear expression of the AR, as decreased circulating levels of androgens occur with aging (48, 49). The weak AR-ir in an 84-yr-old man, who was gynecophilic and who had well documented strong cross-gender identity feelings but never received hormonal treatment or sex reassignment therapy, fits with his age. The fact that the 51-yr-old female-to-male transsexual who did not receive testosterone replacement during the last 3 yr before death still had a female-like pattern of AR-ir is also fully in agreement with the assumption that circulating testosterone is crucial for nuclear AR-ir.

From our data there appeared no relationship between AR-ir and sexual orientation or gender identity. Regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity, a female pattern of AR-ir, i.e. low nuclear staining in the LMN and MMN, was observed in women, castrated male-to-female transsexuals, a female-to-male transsexual, and old men.

Animal studies show that castration induces a shift from strong nuclear to weak cytoplasmic AR-ir in hypothalamic neurons, which can be reversed by treatment with androgens (29, 30). Regarding this point it seems of particular interest to note that ongoing testosterone treatment in female-to-male transsexuals was accompanied by up-regulation of AR in peripheral ectocervix tissue, resulting in increased nuclear AR-ir (32). In addition to the specificity tests (Refs. 29, 36, 39 , and 43 and our additional specificity data), the analogy between data on ARs in animals and humans under different levels of testosterone (33, 34) now also seems to provide biological evidence that in neurons of the human brain, PG21 indeed recognizes ARs. Our data from postmortem tissue are in agreement with the experimental data reported by Wood and Newman (29, 30), as we also show that gonadectomy in transsexuals (34) goes together with cytoplasmic AR-ir, in contrast with the mainly nuclear AR-ir pattern in the male heterosexual and homosexual group, the noncastrated young transsexual subject, and the virilized woman who also had strong nuclear AR-ir. These observations support the concept that the AR occupied by androgens is mainly present in the nucleus, where it can alter gene expression and regulate cell activity, whereas the unoccupied AR is for the most part displaced to the cytoplasm (29, 30). The strikingly complete lack of nuclear AR-ir in the MBC of one male control patient (no. 97101) and in the MMN of two homosexual patients (no. 87084 and 88087) may be due to their antemortem status with a severely compromised immune system that may be accompanied by a strong down-regulation of testosterone levels (45, 46, 47). In aged males the decreased levels of testosterone (50) do not seem to have a strong effect on the AR in the MBC, as after castration no significant change in AR distribution was noticed.

Hormones and their receptors in relation to sexual orientation and transsexuality

The possible role of steroid hormones in the development of sexual orientation has been studied in various animal models (51) and in humans (52). The animal data show that steroid hormones during the neonatal period contribute to the organization of the brain and influence sexual preference (53). In contrast, the exposure to sex steroids during adulthood stimulates sexual behavior, but does not modify sexual orientation in animals or humans (18, 54). In the present study no statistical difference was found in AR-ir between heterosexual and homosexual men. The lack of differences in the AR-ir in the posterior hypothalamus and in the sequence variation in the AR gene (55) between homosexual and heterosexual men suggests that neither the intensity of AR-ir nor a variation in AR structure is related to the expression of homosexuality. Although possible differences between homosexual and heterosexual men in the AR-ir in other brain areas have not yet been systematically studied, the data obtained to date reinforce the idea that homosexuality does not depend on differences in activational effects of testosterone in adulthood (18).

In the present study we found no clear relationship between MBC AR-ir and gender identity as we did, for instance, find for the size of the BSTc and gender identity (4, 8). Recent studies (56, 57, 58, 59) and our observation that the volume and neuron number of the BSTc in male-to-female transsexuals in adulthood is independent of sex hormone levels (4, 8) support the idea that steroids do not act in adulthood but, rather, earlier during development to establish gender identity.

Functional implications

The results obtained in the present study fully agree with the idea that the AR-ir sex differences in the MBC of the posterior hypothalamus are due to differences in circulating levels of androgens and give additional support to the paradigm that endocrine features during adulthood do not contribute to sexual orientation or gender identity.

Anatomical and functional studies in rats have shown that the MMN and LMN are larger in males than in females (60), a sex difference that is accompanied by an increase in the rate of global protein synthesis (61). In addition, experimental data in animals show a sex-specific involvement of the MB in aspects of sexual behavior such as sexual motivation, penile erection, and sexual activity (21, 22, 23, 24, 27). Also in humans, the MBC has been implicated in the regulation of reproduction, possibly by inhibiting the release of gonadotropins, as lesions in the posterior hypothalamus go together with precocious puberty (62). Our findings of gonadal hormone receptors in neurons of the MBC underline the possibility of its involvement in reproduction.

In addition to reproduction, the MBC plays a crucial role in memory function (63). Mamillary bodies atrophy with age (64) and even more so in Alzheimer’s disease (65) and are damaged in alcohol-associated Wernicke-Korsakoff’s disease (66). The decline with age in nuclear AR-ir in the male MBC as found in the present study may also be reflected in functional changes. Whether the observed changes in the MBC play a role in the relationship between low levels of sex hormones and impairment in sexual and cognitive functioning (48, 67, 68) or in the increased prevalence of nonfamiliar Alzheimer’s disease in the elderly (69, 70) should be further investigated. Protective actions of androgens on neurons (71) and memory loss (72, 73) have been described. It may in this connection also be of interest to investigate the possible neuroprotective effects of androgens in age-related diseases in men, in a similar way as is done for estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with reported beneficial effects on physical status, mood, cognition, and the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease (67, 74, 75), although the latter certainly requires more investigation.

In conclusion, here we show for the first time that the sex differences in nuclear AR-ir in the MBC of the posterior hypothalamus reflect differences in circulating levels of androgens rather than differences in sexual orientation or gender identity. The functional implications of these alterations should be studied in the future.


    Acknowledgments
 
Brain material was obtained from The Netherlands Brain Bank (Anne Holtrop, Michiel Kooreman, and José Wouda; coordinator Dr. R. Ravid). We thank Bart Fisser for his technical assistance, Dr. F. W. van Leeuwen for the antibody PG21, Dr. S. Kaiser for critically reading the manuscript, G. van der Meulen for photography, and W. Verweij for secretarial help.


    Footnotes
 
1 Sabbatical stay in The Netherlands partially supported by a grant from CONACyT (Grant 971017). Back

2 Recipient of a grant from the NWO (Grant 903-47004). Back

Received February 8, 2000.

Revised August 29, 2000.

Revised October 9, 2000.

Accepted October 16, 2000.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Kawata M. 1995 Roles of steroid hormones and their receptors in structural organization in the nervous system. Neurosci Res. 24:1–46.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Beyer C. 1999 Estrogen and the developing mammalian brain. Anat Embryol. 199:379–390.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Swaab DF, Hofman MA. 1995 Sexual differentiation of the human hypothalamus in relation to gender and sexual orientation. Trends Neurosci. 18:264–270.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Kruijver FP, Zhou JN, Pool CW, Hofman MA, Gooren LJG, Swaab DF. 2000 Male-to-female transsexuals have female neuron numbers in a limbic nucleus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:2034–2041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Swaab DF. 1997 Neurobiology and neuropathology of the human hypothalamus. In: Bloom FE, Björklund A, Hökfelt T, eds. Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy, vol 13, part 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 39–137.
  6. Swaab DF. 1995 Development of the human hypothalamus. Neurochem Res. 20:509–519.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Ishunina TA, Salehi A, Hofman MA, Swaab DF. 1999 Activity of vasopressinergic neurons of the human supraoptic nucleus is age- and sex-dependent. J Neuroendocrinol. 11:251–258.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Zhou JN, Hofman MA, Gooren LJG, and Swaab DF. 1995 A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality. Nature. 378:68–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Swaab DF, Fliers E. 1985 A sexually dimorphic nucleus in the human brain. Science. 228:1112–1115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Byne W, Lasco LB, Shinwari A, Edgar MA, Morgello S, Jones LB, Tobet S. 2000 The interstitial nuclei of the human anterior hypothalamus: an investigation of sexual variation in volume and cell size, number and density. Brain Res. 254–258.
  11. Allen LS, Hines M, Shryne JE, Gorski RA. 1989 Sex differences in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis of the human brain. J Comp Neurol. 302:697–706.
  12. Swaab DF, Zhou JN, Ehlhart T, Hofman MA. 1994 Development of vasoactive intenstinal polypeptide (VIP) neurons in the human suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in relation to birth and sex. Dev Brain Res. 79:249–259.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Zhou JN, Hofman MA, Swaab DF. 1995 VIP neurons in the human SCN in relation to sex, age, and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 16:571–576.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Allen LS, Gorski RA. 1991 Sexual dimorphism of the anterior commissure and massa intermedia of the human brain. J Comp Neurol. 312:97–104.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Swaab DF, Hofman MA. 1990 An enlarged suprachiasmatic nucleus in homosexual men. Brain Res. 537:141–148.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Allen LS, Gorski RA. 1992 Sexual orientation and the size of the anterior commissure in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:7199–7202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. LeVay S. 1991 A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men. Science. 235:1034–1037.
  18. Buvat J, Lemaire A, Ratajczyk J. 1996 Role of hormones in sexual dysfunctions, homosexuality, transsexualism and deviant sexual behavior: diagnostic and therapeutic consequences. Contracept Fertil Sex. 24:834–846.[Medline]
  19. Gooren LJG. 1990 The endocrinology of transsexualism: a review and commentary. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 15:3–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Fernández-Guasti A, Kruijver FPM, Fodor M, Swaab DF. 2000 Sex differences in the distribution of androgen receptors in the human hypothalamus J Comp Neurol 425:422–435.
  21. Soulairac ML. 1963 Etude experimentale des regulations hormononerveuses du comportment sexuel du rat male. Ann Endocrinol. 24(Suppl):1–94.
  22. MacLean PD, Ploog D. 1962 Cerebral representation of penile erection. J Neurophysiol. 25:29–55.[Free Full Text]
  23. Poeck K, Pilleri G. 1965 Release of hypersexual behaviour due to lesion in the limbic system. Acta Neurol Scand. 41:233–244.[Medline]
  24. Lisk RD. 1967 Neural localization for androgen activation of copulatory behavior in the male rat. Endocrinology. 80:754–761.[Medline]
  25. Michael RP, Rees HD, Bonsall RW. 1989 Sites in the male primate brain at which testosterone acts as an androgen. Brain Res. 502:11–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Clancy AN, Bonsall RW, Michael RP. 1992 Immunocytochemical labeling of androgen receptors in the brain of rat and monkey. Life Sci. 50:409–417.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Galindo-Estaun I. 1983 Effect of mamillary body lesions in adult rats on the survival and development of their young. Rev Esp Fisiol. 39:447–454.[Medline]
  28. Menard CS, Harlan RE. 1993 Up-regulation of androgen receptor immunoreactivity in the rat brain by androgenic-anabolic steroids. Brain Res. 622:226–236.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Wood RI, Newman SW. 1993 Intracellular partitioning of androgen receptor immunoreactivity in the brain of the male Syrian hamster: effects of castration and steroid replacement. J Neurobiol. 24:925–938.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Wood RI, Newman SW. 1999 Androgen receptor immunoreactivity in the male and female Syrian hamster brain. J Neurobiol. 39:359–370.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Lu SF, McKenna SE, Cologer-Clifford A, Nau EA, Simon NG. 1998 Androgen receptor in mouse brain: sex differences and similarities in autoregulation. Endocrinology. 139:1594–1601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. van der Kwast TH, Dommerholt HB, van Vroonhoven CC, Chadha S. 1994 Androgen receptor expression in the cervix of androgen-treated female-to male transsexuals: association with morphology and chain-specific keratin expression. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 13:133–138.[Medline]
  33. Winter JD. 1978 Prepubertal and pubertal endocrinology. In: Falkner F, Tanner, JM, eds. Human growth, vol 2. New York: Plenum Press.
  34. Giltay EJ, Lambert J, Gooren LJG, Elbers JMH, Steyn M, Stehouwer CDA. 1999 Sex steroids, insulin, and arterial stiffness in women and men. Hypertension. 34:590–597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Shi SHR, Chaiwun B, Young L, Cote RJ, Taylor CIR. 1993 Antigen retrieval technique utilizing citrate buffer or urea solution for immunohistochemical demonstration of androgen receptor in formalin-fixed paraffin sections. J Histochem Cytochem. 41:1599–1604.[Abstract]
  36. Puy L, MacLusky NJ, Becker L, Karzan N, Trachtenberg J, Brown TJ. 1995 Immunocytochemical detection of androgen receptor in human temporal cortex: characterization and application of polyclonal androgen receptor antibodies in frozen and paraffin embedded tissues. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 55:197–209.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Adams JC. 1992 Biotin amplification of biotin and horseradish peroxidase signals in histochemical stains. J Histochem Cytochem. 40:1457–1463.[Abstract]
  38. Mai JK, Assheuer J, Paxinos G. 1997 Atlas of the human brain. London: Academic Press.
  39. Prins GS, Birsch L, Greene GL. 1991 Androgen receptor localization in different cell types of the adult rat prostate. Endocrinology. 129:3187–3199.[Abstract]
  40. Michael RP, Clancy AN, Zumpe D. 1995 Distribution of androgen receptor-like immunoreactivity in the brains of cymonologus monkeys. J Neuroendocrinol. 7:713–719.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Janssen PJ, Brinkmann AO, Boersma WJ, van der Kwast TH. 1994 Immunohistochemical detection of the androgen receptor with monoclonal antibody F39.4 in routinely processed paraffin-embedded human tissues after microwave pre-treatment. J Histochem Cytochem. 42:1169–1175.[Abstract]
  42. Sar M, Lubahn DB, French FS, Wilson EM. 1990 Immunocytochemical localization of the androgen receptor in rat and human tissues. Endocrinology. 127:3180–3186.[Abstract]
  43. Iqbal J, Swanson JJ, Prins GS, Jacobson CD. 1995 Androgen receptor-like immunoreactivity in the Brazilian opossum brain and pituitary: distribution and effects of castration and testosterone replacement in the adult male. Brain Res. 703:1–18.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. van der Sluis PJ, Pool CW, Sluiter AA. 1988 Immunochemical detection of peptides and proteins on press-blots after direct tissue gel isoelectric focusing. Electrophoresis. 9:654–661.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Greenspoon S, Corcoran C, Askari H, et al. 1998 Effects of androgen administration in men with the AIDS wasting syndrome. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 129:18–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Dobs AS, Few WL 3rd, Blackman MR, Harman SM, Hoover DR, Graham NM. 1996 Serum hormones in men with human immunodeficiency virus-associated wasting. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:4108–4112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Sellmeyer DE, Grunfeld C. 1996 Endocrine and metabolic disturbances in human immunodeficiency virus infection and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Endocr Rev. 17:518–532.[Abstract]
  48. Seidman SN, Walsch BT. 1999 Testosterone and depression in ageing men. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 7:18–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Sternbach H. 1998 Age-associated testosterone decline in men: clinical issues for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 155:1310–1318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Vermeulen A, Kaufman JM, Giagulli VA. 1996 Influence of some biological indexes on sex hormone-binding globulin and androgen levels in ageing or obese males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1821–1826.[Abstract]
  51. Adkins-Regan E. 1988 Sex hormones and sexual orientation in animals. Psychobiology. 16:335–347.
  52. Meyer-Bahlburg HFL, Ehrhardt AA, Rosen LR, et al. 1995 Prenatal estrogens and the development of homosexual orientation. Dev Psychol. 31:12–21.[CrossRef]
  53. Swaab DF, Slob AK, Houtsmuller EJ, Brand T, Zhou JN. 1995 Increased number of vasopressin neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of "bisexual" adult male rats following perinatal treatment with the aromatase blocker ATD. Dev Brain Res. 85:273–279.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Meyer-Bahlburg HFL. 1984 Psychoendocrine research on sexual orientation: current status and future options in progress. Brain Res. 71:375–397.
  55. Macke JP, Hu N, Hu S, et al. 1993 Sequence variation in the androgen receptor gene is not a common determinant of male sexual orientation. Am J Hum Genet. 53:844–852.[Medline]
  56. Diamond M, Sigmundson HK. 1997 Sex reassignment at birth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 151:298–304.[Abstract]
  57. Gooren L, Cohen-Kettenis PT. 1991 Development of male gender identity/role and a sexual orientation towards women in a 46,XY subject with and incomplete form of the androgen insensitivity syndrome. Arch Sex Behav. 20:459–470.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Birnbacher R, Marberger M, Weissenbacher G, Schober E, Frisch H. 1999 Gender identity reversal in an adolescent with mixed gonadal dysgenesis. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 12:687–690.[Medline]
  59. Dessens AB, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Mellenbergh GJ, van de Poll N, Koppe JG. 1999 Prenatal exposure to anticonvulsants and psychosexual development. Arch Sex Behav. 28:31–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Lopez L, Brana M, Burgos P, Arias JL. 1994 Structural dimorphism in the mammillary bodies of the rat. Neurosci Lett. 176:197–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Gonzalez-Gonzalez S, Gonzalez-Pardo H, Vallejo G, Arias JL. 1996 Functional sexual differences in rat mammillary bodies: a quantitative AG-NOR study. Acta Anat. 157:205–209.[Medline]
  62. Bauer HG. 1954 Endocrine and other clinical manifestations of hypothalamic disease. J Clin Endocrinol. 14:13–31.
  63. Tanaka Y, Miyazawa Y, Akaoka F, Yamada T. 1997 Amnesia following damage to the mammillary bodies. Neurology. 48:160–165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Raz N, Torres IJ, Acker JD. 1992 Age-related shrinkage of the mamillary bodies: in vivo MRI evidence. NeuroReport. 3:713–716.[Medline]
  65. McDuff T, Sumi SM. 1985 Subcortical degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 35:123–126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Kopelman MD. 1995 The Korsakoff syndrome. Br J Psychiatry. 166:154–173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. McEwen BS. 1999 The molecular and neuroanatomical basis for estrogen effects in the central nervous system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:1790–1797.[Free Full Text]
  68. Yaffe K, Lui LY, Grady D, Cauly J, Kramer J, Cummings SR. 2000 Cognitive decline in women in relation to non-protein-bound oestradiol concentrations. Lancet. 356:708–712.[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Henderson VW. 1997 The epidemiology of estrogen replacement therapy and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 48:S27–S35.
  70. Lerner AJ. 1999 Women and Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:1830–1834.[Free Full Text]
  71. Ahlblom E, Grandison L, Bonfoco E, Zhivotovsky B, Ceccatelli S. 1999 Androgen treatment of neonatal rats decreases susceptibility of cerebellar granule neurons to oxidative stress in vitro. Eur J Neurosci. 11:1285–1291.[CrossRef][Medline]
  72. Adinof B, Martin PR, Eckardt MJ, Linnoila M. 1993 Role of DHEA and DHEA-S in Alzheimer disease. Am J Psychiatry. 150:1432–1433.[Medline]
  73. Carlson LE, Sherwin BB, Chertkow HM. 1999 Relationships between dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and cortisol (CRT) plasma levels and everyday memory in Alzheimer’s disease patients compared to healthy controls. Horm Behav. 35:254–263.[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. Ohkura T, Isse K, Akazawa K, Hamamoto M, Yaoi Y, Hagino N. 1994 Evaluation of estrogen treatment in female patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Endocr J. 41:361–371.[Medline]
  75. Tang MX, Jacobs D, Stern Y, et al. 1996 Effect of oestrogen during menopause on risk and age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 348:429–432.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. R. Genazzani, N. Pluchino, S. Luisi, and M. Luisi
Estrogen, cognition and female ageing
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 175 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
E. J Giltay, K. H Kho, B. A Blansjaar, M. M Verbeek, P B. H Geurtz, J. M Geleijnse, and L. J G Gooren
The sex difference of plasma homovanillic acid is unaffected by cross-sex hormone administration in transsexual subjects
J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 187(1): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
M. Fodor, F. W. van Leeuwen, and D. F. Swaab
Differences in Postmortem Stability of Sex Steroid Receptor Immunoreactivity in Rat Brain
J. Histochem. Cytochem., May 1, 2002; 50(5): 641 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Quigley
The Postnatal Gonadotropin and Sex Steroid Surge--Insights from the Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2002; 87(1): 24 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kruijver, F. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swaab, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kruijver, F. P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Swaab, D. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals